The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, X.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by He, X.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, J. M.
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 163: 6173-6179.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

Prostaglandin E2 Selectively Inhibits Human CD4+ T Cells Secreting Low Amounts of Both IL-2 and IL-41

Xiaowen He2,{dagger} and John M. Stuart*,{dagger}

* Research Service 151, Veterans Administration Medical Center, and {dagger} Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN 38104


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PGE2 is a potent inflammatory mediator with profound immune regulatory actions. The present study examined the effects of PGE2 on the activation/proliferation of CD4+ T cells using 37 cloned CD4+ T cell lines. Ten T cell clones sensitive to PGE2 and 10 T cell clones resistant to PGE2, as measured by proliferation in response to anti-CD3 Ab, were selected for comparison. It was found that the PGE2-sensitive T cells were characterized by low production (<200 pg/ml) of both IL-2 and IL-4, while PGE2-resistant T cells secreted high levels (>1000 pg/ml) of IL-2, IL-4, or both. The roles of IL-2 and IL-4 were confirmed by the finding that addition of exogenous lymphokines could restore PGE2-inhibited proliferation, and PGE2-resistant Th1-, Th2-, and Th0-like clones became PGE2 sensitive when IL-2, IL-4, or both were removed using Abs specific for the respective lymphokines. In addition, we showed that the CD45RA expression in PGE2-sensitive T cells was significantly lower than that in PGE2-resistant cells (mean intensity, 1.2 ± 0.6 vs 7.8 ± 5.7; p = 0.001). In contrast, CD45RO expression in PGE2-sensitive T cells was significantly higher that that in PGE2-resistant cells (mean intensity, 55.7 ± 15.1 vs 33.4 ± 12.9; p = 0.02). In summary, PGE2 predominantly suppressed CD45RA-RO+ CD4+ T cells with low secretion of both IL-2 and IL-4.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Prostaglandins of the E series (PGEs)3 are produced by the action of cyclooxygenases on arachidonic acid liberated from membrane phospholipids. They function both in homeostasis and as potent inflammatory mediators. On binding to high affinity receptors in the cell membrane, PGEs function by increasing cAMP levels through activation of adenylate cyclase (1, 2). Prostaglandin E, especially PGE2, is produced in large quantities by monocytes/macrophages (3, 4) and fibroblasts (5) and in lesser amounts by dendritic cells and follicular dendritic cells (6, 7). Many of these cells are professional APC, suggesting that PGE2 may have a role in modulating specific immune responsiveness.

Consistent with this possibility, previous studies have provided evidence that PGE2 modifies lymphokine production and proliferation of T cells. It has been demonstrated that PGE2 inhibits mitogen-stimulated mouse and human T cell proliferation (8, 9). In 1990, it was reported that increased intracellular cAMP suppressed IL-2 and proliferation of Th1 cells, but did not affect IL-4 and proliferation of Th2 cells in mice (10, 11). Also working with murine cells, Betz and Fox subsequently demonstrated that PGE2 and the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin inhibited IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} production by Th1 clones, but not IL-4 and IL-5 production by Th2 clones (12). In studies using human lymphocytes, it has been shown that increased intracellular cAMP or PGE2 modulated T cell lymphokine production and proliferation in a way similar to its action on murine cells (13, 14).

It is well established in mice that Th1, but not Th2, cells secrete IL-2 and IFN-{gamma}, while Th2, but not Th1, cells secrete IL-4, IL-5, as well as IL-10 (15). In humans, however, T cells with typical Th1 or Th2 lymphokine secretion patterns account for only a small proportion of the total population. Most T cells secrete both Th1 and Th2 lymphokines and can be characterized as Th0 type (16). Therefore, even though the sensitivity of T cell proliferation in response to PGE2 can be linked to whether the T cells are of the Th1 or Th2 phenotype, it is not clear what effect PGE2 has on the activation and proliferation of the majority of T cells. In addition, it is not known whether T cells sensitive to PGE2 have a characteristic phenotype, which has biological significance. The present study approached these questions by examining the effects of PGE2 on the proliferation of a large panel of CD4+ T cell clones. By comparing T cell clones sensitive to PGE2 with those resistant to PGE2, as measured by proliferation in response to anti-CD3 Ab, we discovered that the two groups of T cells differ greatly in the production of IL-2 and IL-4, both of which are found to be crucial in supporting T cell activities, especially in the presence of PGE2. In addition, they are differ in CD45 isoform expression, which might relate to the stimulation/activation the cells have experienced.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Generation and maintenance of human T cell clones

Mononuclear cells were purified from heparinized blood by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation. Cells at the interface were removed, washed three times, and resuspended in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS. Cells were cultured at a concentration of 0.5–1 x 106/ml for 24 h in culture plates coated with Ab to CD3. The stimulated cells were then distributed into 96-well microtiter plates with round-bottom wells at an average concentration of 0.5 cell/culture in the presence of 104 irradiated filler cells and 50 U/ml rIL-2 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ). After 14–18 days, the outgrowing T cell clones were identified by inspection and cultured with irradiated filler cells at 3 x 105 cells/culture and 20 U/ml rIL-2 in 24-well plates. After an additional 7–10 days, the emerging T cell clones were stained with FITC-conjugated Ab to CD4 and PE-conjugated Ab to CD8 (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) and subjected to flow cytometric analysis. Selected T cell clones were maintained by repeated restimulation every 7–10 days in the presence of 10 U/ml exogenous IL-2 and irradiated filler cells.

Ab to CD3 was purified from ascites fluid of nude mice injected with an anti-CD3 producing hybridoma cell line (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA). For anti-CD3 stimulation, the plates were coated with Ab to human CD3 (50 µg/ml in PBS) by incubation overnight at 4°C. After washing twice to remove the unbound Abs, plates were used directly.

The filler cells were EBV transformed human B cells that were irradiated and treated with a combination of neuraminidase and galactose oxidase. The enzyme treatment alters the membrane glycoproteins and enables the human B cell lines to act as mitogens and induce strong T cell proliferative responses. The treatment and its effects have been described previously (17). Briefly, the EBV-transformed B cells were irradiated at 10,000 rad, washed twice with serum-free RPMI, and then suspended in serum-free RPMI at 5 x 106 cells/ml in the presence 0.02 U/ml of neuraminidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 0.05 U/ml of galactose oxidase (Sigma). The cells were incubated at 37°C for 90 min. After washing twice with RPMI containing 2% FCS and 10 mM galactose (Sigma) and once with wash medium without galactose, the filler cells were resuspended in RPMI complete culture medium and used.

Lymphokine analyses

For lymphokine analysis, resting T cells were cultured at a concentration of 1 x 105 cells/culture in RPMI with 10% FBS in flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates coated with Ab to CD3. In some cultures PGE2 (Sigma) was added to assess the effects of PGE2 on lymphokine secretion. Cultures in wells without Ab to CD3 were set up in parallel to assess background lymphokine secretion. Supernatants were harvested after 24 h. The cells and debris were removed from the supernatant by centrifugation. Interferon-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10 were measured in duplicate using commercially available ELISA kits (Endogen, Cambridge, MA; and R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Proliferation assays

For proliferation analysis, T cells were cultured at a concentration of 3–4 x 104 cells/well in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS in flat-bottom 96-well plates coated with anti-CD3 in duplicate. After 48 h, each of the cultures was pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine. After an additional 12 h, cells were harvested onto glass-fiber filters and counted on a Matrix 96 direct ionization beta counter (Packard, Meridian, CT). Proliferation responses were assessed by the mean [3H]thymidine incorporation.

CD45RA and CD45RO expressions

The T cells were stained with PE-conjugated Ab to CD45RA or FITC-conjugated Ab to CD45RO (PharMingen, San Diego) and analyzed by flow cytometry. For each sample a control Simultest Control {gamma}1/{gamma}2 (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) was used. CD45RA and CD45RO expressions were assessed by mean fluorescent intensity.

Statistical analysis

Statistical evaluation of differences among multiple groups of data was performed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. When the normality test failed, Friedman’s repeated measures ANOVA on ranks was used. The analyses were followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. For differences between two groups of data the unpaired t test was used. When the normality test failed, the Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used. Data were judged statistically significant when p < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PGE2 inhibits the proliferative response of T cells

A total of 37 CD4+ T cell clones were isolated for use in this study. On the average, PGE2 inhibited proliferation of these cells in a dose-dependent manner. In the presence of PGE2 at concentrations of 10-8, 10-7, 10-6, and 10-5 M, [3H]thymidine incorporation by the 37 T cell clones decreased from the average control value of 53,110 by 7, 41, 62, and 78%, respectively (Fig. 1Go). However, the effect of PGE2 on the responses of individual T cell clones differed substantially, as evidenced by the large SDs. PGE2 strongly inhibited proliferation in some clones, but exerted only minimal effects on others. Examples of clones that were strongly inhibited and minimally affected are shown in Fig. 2Go.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Inhibition of cell proliferation by PGE2. T cell clones were isolated and stimulated by Ab to CD3 as described in Materials and Methods. The data are given as the mean percentage of control [3H]thymidine incorporation by each clone (±SD) in the absence or the presence of PGE2 ranging from 10-8 to 10-5 M. *, p < 0.05.

 


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Examples of two CD4+ T cell clones with different sensitivities to PGE2 as measured by a proliferation assay. Both clones were stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3 in the presence of PGE2 ranging from 10-8 to 10-5 M. One T cell clone (H54) was substantially inhibited by PGE2, whereas the other clone (H35) was resistant. The data are given as the mean (±SD) [3H]thymidine incorporation of duplicate tests.

 
To study the characteristics of cells that were either PGE2 sensitive or resistant as measured by proliferation, 20 clones were selected. Ten of them were sensitive to PGE2, while the other 10 were resistant. When stimulated by immobilized Ab to CD3, [3H]thymidine incorporation of the PGE2-sensitive and resistant clones were similar, at 43,789 ± 26,240 and 49,612 ± 24,355 respectively. However, in the presence of PGE2 at 10-6 M, the [3H]thymidine incorporation of the sensitive group was reduced to 2,318 ± 1,881 (5.3% of control value), while that in the resistant group was only reduced to 36,616 ± 18,160 (74% of control value). Values for each of the 20 selected clones are shown in Fig. 3Go.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Responses of sensitive and resistant clones. T cell clones were stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3 in the absence (shaded bars) or the presence (black bars) of 10-6 M PGE2. The data for 10 sensitive clones (A) are shown in comparison with those for 10 resistant clones (B). The data are given as the mean (±SD) [3H]thymidine incorporation of duplicate tests.

 
Ability of PGE2 to inhibit lymphokine secretion

The ability of PGE2 to affect lymphokine secretion was tested in 11 clones (Fig. 4Go). Five cytokines were chosen for analysis, including IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10. In general, at concentrations between 10-8 and 10-5 M, PGE2 inhibited lymphokine production in a dose-dependent manner. However, there were substantial differences among lymphokines. Of the five lymphokines tested, IL-2 production was most sensitive to inhibition. It was strongly suppressed by PGE2 at concentrations as low as 10-8 M and was almost completely inhibited by PGE2 at a concentration of 10-7 M. IL-10, IFN-{gamma}, and IL-4 production were also sensitive to the effects of PGE2, although inhibition required doses that were about 10- to 1000-fold higher than that for IL-2. IL-5 was relatively resistant to PGE2 and was even enhanced by PGE2 at low concentrations. To confirm the data, all 37 CD4+ T cell clones were tested in the presence of PGE2 at a concentration of 10-6 M. The results were consistent (Table IGo).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. The effect of PGE2 on lymphokine secretion by CD4+ T cell clones. Eleven randomly selected clones were stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3. Supernatants were harvested after 24 h, and levels of IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 were measured. The data are expressed as a mean (±SD) percentage of the control value of each clone in the absence of PGE2. *, p < 0.05.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Inhibition of lymphokine secretion by PGE2a

 
Relationship of sensitivity to PGE2 and lymphokine secretion

Since it has previously been reported that Th1 cells are sensitive to the effects of increased intracellular cAMP and PGE2 whereas Th2 cells are not (11, 14), we attempted to correlate the sensitivity of proliferation to PGE2 with the lymphokine secretion profile of the T cell clones. To achieve this, we compared anti-CD3-induced IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 production of 10 T cell clones sensitive to PGE2 as measured by proliferation with that of 10 T cell clones resistant to PGE2 (Table IIGo). As reported by other investigators, T cell clones that were resistant to PGE2 in proliferation secreted higher levels of IL-4 and IL-5 than clones that were sensitive to PGE2 (11, 14). However, most of the resistant clones also secreted high amounts of IL-2. A stronger correlation was found between PGE2 resistance and the secretion of IL-2, IL-4, or both than with Th phenotype. While T cell clones resistant to PGE2 uniformly secreted high levels of IL-2, IL-4, or both, all the T cell clones sensitive to PGE2 secreted low amounts of both IL-2 and IL-4. In contrast, both PGE2-sensitive and PGE2-resistant groups contained clones that were high and low producers of IFN-{gamma} and IL-10, suggesting that these two lymphokines have little, if any, correlation with the sensitivity of T cell proliferation in response to PGE2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 secretion by CD4+ T cell clonesa

 
Interestingly, among T cell clones sensitive to PGE2, there were Th1-like clones such as H46, Th2-like clones such as H52, and Th0-like clones such as H49. Similarly, among T cell clones resistant to PGE2, there were also Th1-like clones such as H43 and H62, Th2-like clones such as H21 and H37, and Th0-like clones such as H40 and H35. Therefore, it was not possible to predict PGE2 sensitivity based on whether the T cell clones were Th1-, Th2-, or Th0-like.

IL-2 or IL-4 could restore the proliferative response of PGE2-sensitive T cell clones

To understand the correlation between IL-2 and IL-4 secretion and the sensitivity of the T cell proliferation to PGE2, the concentrations of the lymphokines inhibited by PGE2 were measured. It was found that in the presence of PGE2 at 10-6 M, the IL-2 and IL-4 secreted by T cell clones with low lymphokine production usually disappeared. In comparison, those secreted by T cell clones with high lymphokine production were greatly inhibited, but usually still present in the cultures (data not shown). These data suggest that both IL-2 and IL-4 might be crucial in supporting T cell proliferation, especially in the presence of PGE2. To obtain direct evidence, experiments were performed in which exogenous IL-2 or IL-4 was added to two PGE2-sensitive T cell clones, H41 and H64. Proliferation of both these T cell clones was almost completely inhibited by PGE2 at 10-6M. Neither of the clones secreted detectable IL-2 or IL-4 upon anti-CD3 stimulation. The experiments from both T cell clones showed similar results. Although IL-2 was more effective, either exogenous IL-2 or IL-4 was able to promote T cell proliferation in the presence of PGE2. The results from T cell clone H41 are shown in Fig. 5Go. In contrast to the effects of IL-2 and IL-4, IL-10 was not capable of restoring proliferation inhibited by PGE2.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Up-regulation of T cell proliferation by addition of exogenous IL-2 or IL-4 in the presence of PGE2. CD4+ T cell clones previously determined to be sensitive to PGE2 were stimulated with anti-CD3 in the presence of PGE2 at 10-6 M. IL-2 (solid circle), IL-4 (open circle), or IL-10 (solid triangle) was added at the initiation of the culture. Two PGE2-sensitive clones (H41 and H63) were each tested in two separate experiments. Only the data (mean ± SD) from clone H41 in one experiment is shown. All the experiments showed similar results.

 
Based on the data presented in Table IIGo the sensitivity of proliferation of the T cell clones to PGE2 could also be correlated with IL-5 secretion. We, therefore, tested IL-5 at concentrations of 0.2–20 ng/ml for its ability to up-regulate the proliferation of two sensitive T cell clones in the presence of PGE2 at 10-6 M in separate experiments. No enhancement of proliferation by IL-5 was identified (data not shown), suggesting that the observed correlation was not caused by the biological effects of IL-5.

Down-regulation of proliferation of PGE2-resistant T cell clones by Abs against IL-2 and/or IL-4

We further investigated the role of IL-2 or IL-4 in supporting the proliferative response of Th1, Th2, and Th0 like cells in the presence of PGE2 using Abs to IL-2, IL-4, or both. Abs were added to three PGE2-resistant T cell clones, and the clones were stimulated by Ab to CD3 in the presence of 10-6M PGE2. H62 was a Th1-like clone that secreted 5671 pg/ml of IL-2 and 136 pg/ml of IL-4 (Table IIGo). These levels were reduced to 682 and 52 pg/ml, respectively, by PGE2. H37 was a Th2-like clone that secreted no detectable IL-2, but secreted 4676 pg/ml of IL-4. These levels were reduced to 867 pg/ml by PGE2. H40 was a Th0-like clone that secreted 2377 pg/ml of IL-2 and 4864 pg/ml of IL-4, which were reduced to 21 and 4185 pg/ml, respectively, by PGE2. The proliferation of the Th1-like clone H62 could be inhibited by PGE2 in the presence of Ab to IL-2, while Ab to IL-4 had only a slight effect. In contrast, the proliferation of the Th2-like clone H37 could be inhibited by PGE2 only in the presence of Ab to IL-4, while Ab to IL-2 had no effect. For the Th0-like clone H40, Ab to either IL-2 or IL-4 was partially effective in inhibiting T cell proliferation in the presence of PGE2, and the combination of both Abs was additive (Fig. 6Go). These results indicated that in the presence of PGE2, proliferation of Th1-like cells depended on IL-2, that of Th2-like cells depended on IL-4, and that of Th0-like cells depended on both IL-2 and IL-4.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Down-regulation of T cell proliferation by anti-IL-2 and/or anti-IL-4 Abs in the presence of PGE2. A Th1 clone (H62), a Th2 clone (H37), and a Th0 clone (H40), all of which were resistant to PGE2, were stimulated with anti-CD3 in the presence of PGE2 at 10-6 M. Ab to IL-2, IL-4, or both were added at the initiation of culture. The experiments were repeated twice with similar results. The data are given as the mean [3H]thymidine incorporation (±SD) of duplicate tests.

 
CD45 isoform expression by PGE2-sensitive and -resistant CD4+ T cells

CD45 is a TCR-linked protein tyrosine phosphatase that is present in several isoforms. Although its exact function is not clearly understood, it is known that naive cells express the CD45RA isoform, and after activation some cells express the CD45RO isoform. It has been suggested that CD45RO is a marker for memory T cells (18). To determine whether there was a correlation between CD45 isoform expression and sensitivity to PGE2, PGE2-sensitive and -resistant clones were analyzed by flow cytometry for CD45 isoform expression. These studies were conducted soon after the clones were established to minimize the effects of repeated in vitro restimulation. The mean intensity of CD45RA expression in the sensitive clones ranged from 0.5 to 2.3, which was significantly lower than that of the resistant clones, which ranged from 6.3 to 19.0 (mean, 1.2 ± 0.6 vs 7.8 ± 5.7; p = 0.001). In contrast, CD45RO expression in the PGE-sensitive clones ranged from 36.2 to 78.4, which was significantly higher than that of resistant clones, which ranged from 9.4 to 45.1 (mean, 55.7 ± 15.1 vs 33.4 ± 12.9; p = 0.02; Table IIIGo). As examples, the results of a PGE2-sensitive T cell clone (H63) and a PGE2-resistant T cell clone (H37) are shown in Fig. 7Go. Data are shown for seven resistant and six sensitive clones that were analyzed simultaneously. The other three of the 10 sensitive and four of the 10 resistant clones were also tested in the same way, but in a different experiment, and gave comparable results, although the precise level of staining was variable (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. CD45RA and CD45RO expression of CD4+ T cell clonesa

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. CD45RA and CD45RO expression by a T cell clone sensitive to PGE2 and a clone resistant to PGE2. Seven sensitive and six resistant clones were stained with PE (anti-CD45RA)- or FITC (anti-CD45RO)-conjugated Ab and analyzed by flow cytometry in one experiment. A representative PGE2-resistant T cell clone (H37) and a PGE2-sensitive T cell clone (H63) are shown. The contours with dot lines on the left of each figure show the fluorescent intensities of the same sets of cells with isotype control staining.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PGE2 differs in its effect on different lymphokines. Of the five lymphokines tested, IL-2 production was most sensitive to PGE2. Since IL-2 is a Th1 lymphokine, these data are, in general, consistent with those from previous studies, which suggested that Th1 lymphokines are more sensitive to PGE2 (13, 14). However, our data differ from previous observations in that we found that IL-4 is as sensitive as IFN-{gamma} to PGE2 inhibition. The reason for the inconsistency is not clear. One reason may be that we studied randomly selected T cell clones, while other groups used PBLs or representative T cell clones with typical Th patterns.

Our data suggest that in the presence of PGE2, IL-2 can support the proliferation of Th1 cells, IL-4 can support that of Th2 cells, while either IL-2 or IL-4 can support that of Th0 cells. Because IL-2 is much more sensitive to inhibition than IL-4, it is not surprising that, on the average, proliferation of Th1 cells was more sensitive to inhibition by PGE2 than was that of Th2 cells (11, 14). Consistent with this, we also observed that proliferation of Th1 clones that secreted moderate levels of IL-2 was usually more sensitive to PGE2, in contrast to that of Th2 clones that secreted moderate levels of IL-4 (data not shown). However, our overall results do not fully support the concept that the proliferation of Th1 cells is sensitive to PGE2 inhibition whereas that of Th2 cells is not. As examples of important exceptions, we have shown that the proliferation of some Th1-like clones that secrete high levels of IL-2, such as H43 and H62 was resistant to PGE2. In addition, the proliferation of some Th2-like clones that secrete low levels of IL-4, such as H52, was sensitive to PGE2 (see Table IIGo).

It has been reported that a class of cytokines, including the T cell lymphokines IL-2 and IL-4, use a shared receptor-signaling component that forms the {gamma}-chain of the IL-2R (19). Any lymphokine whose effect is mediated through the shared pathway will support cell proliferation (20, 21). Our studies showed that in the presence of PGE2, IL-2 and/or IL-4 secretion by resistant T cell clones was diminished, but usually still present. The reduced levels of lymphokines were apparently sufficient to maintain cell proliferation. This explanation is strongly supported by additional experiments in which the IL-2 and/or IL-4 concentration in the culture was increased by the additional exogenous lymphokines or was decreased by Abs against the lymphokines. However, this might not be the whole story. We have found that PGE2 could still, to some extent, inhibit the T cell proliferation of sensitive T cell clones even in the presence of a high amount of exogenous IL-2 (data not shown), suggesting that other mechanisms of suppression might also exist. Further study of the effects of PGE2 on the regulation of genes relating to T cell activation/proliferation and the interaction between IL-2R {gamma}-chain signaling and the gene regulation in PGE2-resistant and -sensitive T cell clones might help us to understand more about the mechanisms of PGE2 inhibition.

Although the present study addressed the roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in T cell activation and proliferation in the presence of PGE2, it does not exclude the possibility that other lymphokines may also be involved. Lymphokines that use the IL-2R common {gamma}-chain and support T cell activities include not only IL-2 and IL-4, but also IL-7, IL-9, and IL-15 (19, 20, 21). T cells do not produce IL-7 and IL-15 (22, 23, 24). Therefore, these lymphokines are unlikely to have been involved in the experimental system we used. However, they may be important in preventing T cell activities from being inhibited by PGE2 in vivo, especially in some inflammation sites. IL-9 is a T cell lymphokine that is preferentially expressed in CD4+ Th2 cells (25). It is possible that this lymphokine may also be involved in the experimental system we used. It is likely, however, that IL-9 secretion would parallel IL-4 in much the same way that IL-5 does. In any case, the presence of IL-9 would not alter the observation that PGE2 sensitivity is not dependent upon Th classification.

Our data suggested that sensitivity to PGE2 is not determined by the Th1 or Th2 phenotype. To determine whether the sensitivity to PGE2 is related to the activation states of T cells, we analyzed the cell lines for activation markers. Although several markers were tested, we report here on our findings with CD45. CD45 is a member of a family of molecules that appear to play a role in activation through the TCR. CD45 isoforms are expressed on various cells, and the pattern of expression varies with the stage of development and antigenic stimulation. CD45RA is the high m.w. form of CD45, while CD45RO is a lower m.w. form. Both forms act as protein tyrosine phosphatases. However, the precise functions of CD45 isoforms remain incompletely understood (26, 27, 28).

It was previously believed that CD45RA and CD45RO are markers of virgin and memory T cells, respectively (18). This was based on the in vitro observations that CD45RO is expressed after activation, and cells that express it respond more vigorously to recall responses (29, 30, 31). These cells also express a combination of early and late activation markers and several adhesion molecules (18, 32). However, subsequent in vivo studies have shown that cells can revert to expression of CD45RA (33, 34, 35). Therefore, although the correlation between the expression of CD45 isoforms and the sensitivity to PGE2 found in the present study relates the sensitivity to PGE2 to the memory status of T cells, it is still unclear whether the cells with distinct sensitivity to PGE2 represent a unique subset of cells.

Of course, the cells used in these experiments have all been stimulated in culture, so we were unable to measure the response of a truly naive cell. All the cell lines in these experiments had some level of CD45RO expression. To minimize the effects of repeated stimulation, all cells were tested soon after isolation (all were stimulated three or four times), so all had experienced a similar number of doublings during our cloning procedure. In addition, the proliferative responses and the sensitivity to PGE2 of 11 clones and the IL-2 and IL-4 secretion of eight clones were successively tested two or three times. All measurements appear relatively stable. However, with continued long term culture of the PGE2-resistant cell lines we have observed an increase in sensitivity to PGE2 that is associated with decreased CD45RA and increased CD45RO expression (data not shown).

It has been reported that naive CD4+ T cells produce only IL-2 and IL-3, whereas memory cells can be induced to secrete a range of T cell cytokines (18). It seems, therefore, that although naive T cells are limited in their ability to produce lymphokines, after a few cycles of stimulation they become potent lymphokine producers. Based on our findings, at this stage they would be resistant to the effects of PGE2. Cells that were CD45RO in vivo and had been restimulated and expanded in vitro may have reduced overall lymphokine production and become PGE2 sensitive.

In conclusion, our present study has correlated sensitivity to PGE2 with the secretion of IL-2R {gamma}-chain signaling cytokines and the activation status of CD4+ cells. Our data do not fully support the differential regulation of Th1- and Th2-mediated responses. Cells that express high levels of IL-2 or IL-4 are resistant to PGE2. This is most likely due to the inability of PGE2 to completely suppress cytokine production, as confirmed by altering the response by addition of exogenous cytokines or absorptive Abs. These data suggest the possibility that the down-regulation of IL-2R {gamma}-chain signaling cytokines in T cell-mediated inflammatory diseases, especially those with chronic recurrence, may lead to enhanced sensitivity of the T cells to PGE2 inhibition and diminished inflammatory responses.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. C. M. Weyand and J. J. Goronzy, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), for critical review of the manuscript, and Dr. Jim Y. Wan, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee (Memphis, TN), for assistance with statistical analyses.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the Office of Research and Development, Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, and by U.S. Public Health Service SCOR Grant AR39169 from the National Institute for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Xiaowen He, Research Service 151, Veterans Administration Medical Center, 1030 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviation used in this paper: PGE, PG of the E series. Back

Received for publication December 18, 1998. Accepted for publication September 17, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. McKnight, G. S.. 1991. Cyclic AMP second messenger systems. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 3:213.[Medline]
  2. Goto, T., R. B. Herberman, A. Maluish, D. M. Strong. 1983. Cyclic AMP as a mediator of prostaglandin E-induced suppression of human natural killer cell activity. J. Immunol. 130:1350.[Abstract]
  3. Kurland, J. I., R. Bockman. 1978. Prostaglandin E production by human blood monocytes and mouse peritoneal macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 147:952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ferreri, N. R., W. C. Howland, H. L. Spiegelberg. 1986. Release of leukotrienes C4 and B4 and prostaglandin E2 from human monocytes stimulated with aggregated IgG, IgA, and IgE. J. Immunol. 136:4188.[Abstract]
  5. Elias, J. A., K. Gustilo, W. Baeder, B. Freundlich. 1987. Synergistic stimulation of fibroblast prostaglandin production by recombinant interleukin 1 and tumor necrosis factor. J. Immunol. 138:3812.[Abstract]
  6. Heinen, E., N. Cormann, M. Braun, C. Kinet-Denoel, J. Vanderschelden, L. J. Simar. 1986. Isolation of follicular dendritic cells from human tonsils and adenoids. VI. Analysis of prostaglandin secretion. Ann. Inst. Pasteur Immunol. 137D:369.
  7. Phipps, R. P., R. L. Roper, S. H. Stein. 1990. Regulation of B-cell tolerance and triggering by macrophages and lymphoid dendritic cells. Immunol. Rev. 117:135.[Medline]
  8. Goodwin, J. S., J. Ceuppens. 1983. Regulation of the immune response by prostaglandins. J. Clin. Immunol. 3:295.[Medline]
  9. Goodwin, J. S., A. D. Bankhurst, R. P. Messner. 1977. Suppression of human T-cell mitogenesis by prostaglandin: existence of a prostaglandin-producing suppressor cell. J. Exp. Med. 146:1719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Novak, T. J., E. V. Rothenberg. 1990. cAMP inhibits induction of interleukin 2 but not of interleukin 4 in T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:9353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Munoz, E., A. M. Zubiaga, M. Merrow, N. P. Sauter, B. T. Huber. 1990. Cholera toxin discriminates between T helper 1 and 2 cells in T cell receptor-mediated activation: role of cAMP in T cell proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 172:95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Betz, M., B. S. Fox. 1991. Prostaglandin E2 inhibits production of Th1 lymphokines but not of Th2 lymphokines. J. Immunol. 146:108.[Abstract]
  13. Snijdewint, F. G., P. Kalinski, E. A. Wierenga, J. D. Bos, M. L. Kapsenberg. 1993. Prostaglandin E2 differentially modulates cytokine secretion profiles of human T helper lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 150:5321.[Abstract]
  14. Gold, K. N., C. M. Weyand, J. J. Goronzy. 1994. Modulation of helper T cell function by prostaglandins. Arthritis Rheum. 37:925.[Medline]
  15. Mosmann, T. R., J. H. Schumacher, N. F. Street, R. Budd, A. O’Garra, T. A. Fong, M. W. Bond, K. W. Moore, A. Sher, D. F. Fiorentino. 1991. Diversity of cytokine synthesis and function of mouse CD4+ T cells. Immunol. Rev. 123:209.[Medline]
  16. de Vries, J. E., R. de Waal Malefyt, H. Yssel, M. G. Roncarolo, H. Spits. 1991. Do human TH1 and TH2 CD4+ clones exist?. Res. Immunol. 142:59.[Medline]
  17. Ren, E. C., S. H. Chan. 1984. Mitogenic capacity of oxidized human B cell lines. Eur. J. Immunol. 14:1156.[Medline]
  18. Dutton, R. W., L. M. Bradley, S. L. Swain. 1998. T cell memory. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:201.[Medline]
  19. Russell, S. M., J. A. Johnston, M. Noguchi, M. Kawamura, C. M. Bacon, M. Friedmann, M. Berg, D. W. McVicar, B. A. Witthuhn, O. E. A. Silvennoinen. 1994. Interaction of IL-2R ß and {gamma} c chains with Jak1 and Jak3: implications for XSCID and XCID. Science 266:1042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Akbar, A. N., N. J. Borthwick, R. G. Wickremasinghe, P. Panayoitidis, D. Pilling, M. Bofill, S. Krajewski, J. C. Reed, M. Salmon. 1996. Interleukin-2 receptor common {gamma}-chain signaling cytokines regulate activated T cell apoptosis in response to growth factor withdrawal: selective induction of anti-apoptotic (bcl-2, bcl-xL) but not pro-apoptotic (bax, bcl-xS) gene expression. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:294.[Medline]
  21. Grabstein, K. H., J. Eisenman, K. Shanebeck, C. Rauch, S. Srinivasan, V. Fung, C. Beers, J. Richardson, M. A. Schoenborn, M. Ahdieh, et al 1994. Cloning of a T cell growth factor that interacts with the ß chain of the interleukin-2 receptor. Science 264:965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Benjamin, D., V. Sharma, T. J. Knobloch, R. J. Armitage, M. A. Dayton, R. G. Goodwin. 1994. B cell IL-7. Human B cell lines constitutively secrete IL-7 and express IL-7 receptors. J. Immunol. 152:4749.[Abstract]
  23. Ryan, D. H., B. L. Nuccie, I. Ritterman, J. L. Liesveld, C. N. Abboud. 1994. Cytokine regulation of early human lymphopoiesis. J. Immunol. 152:5250.[Abstract]
  24. McInnes, I. B., J. al-Mughales, M. Field, B. P. Leung, F. P. Huang, R. Dixon, R. D. Sturrock, P. C. Wilkinson, F. Y. Liew. 1996. The role of interleukin-15 in T-cell migration and activation in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Med. 2:175.[Medline]
  25. Renauld, J. C., A. Kermouni, A. Vink, J. Louahed, J. Van Snick. 1995. Interleukin-9 and its receptor: involvement in mast cell differentiation and T cell oncogenesis. J. Leukocyte Biol. 57:353.[Abstract]
  26. Justement, L. B.. 1997. The role of CD45 in signal transduction. Adv. Immunol. 66:1.[Medline]
  27. Neel, B. G.. 1997. Role of phosphatases in lymphocyte activation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9:405.[Medline]
  28. Altin, J. G., E. K. Sloan. 1997. The role of CD45 and CD45-associated molecules in T cell activation. Immunol. Cell. Biol. 75:430.[Medline]
  29. Sanders, M. E., M. W. Makgoba, S. Shaw. 1988. Human naive and memory T cells: reinterpretation of helper-inducer and suppressor-inducer subsets. Immunol. Today 9:195.[Medline]
  30. Akbar, A. N., L. Terry, A. Timms, P. C. Beverley, G. Janossy. 1988. Loss of CD45R and gain of UCHL1 reactivity is a feature of primed T cells. J. Immunol. 140:2171.[Abstract]
  31. Merkenschlager, M., L. Terry, R. Edwards, P. C. Beverley. 1988. Limiting dilution analysis of proliferative responses in human lymphocyte populations defined by the monoclonal antibody UCHL1: implications for differential CD45 expression in T cell memory formation. Eur. J. Immunol. 18:1653.[Medline]
  32. Bell, E. B., S. M. Sparshott, C. Bunce. 1998. CD4+ T-cell memory, CD45R subsets and the persistence of antigen–a unifying concept. Immunol. Today 19:60.[Medline]
  33. Bell, E. B., S. M. Sparshott. 1990. Interconversion of CD45R subsets of CD4 T cells in vivo. Nature 348:163.[Medline]
  34. Michie, C. A., A. McLean, C. Alcock, P. C. Beverley. 1992. Lifespan of human lymphocyte subsets defined by CD45 isoforms. Nature 360:264.[Medline]
  35. McLean, A. R., C. A. Michie. 1995. In vivo estimates of division and death rates of human T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:3707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
A. EISENTHAL, K. EYTAN, E. BRAZOWSKI, G. GITSTEIN, R. GREENBERG, and Y. SKORNICK
Effects of 5-FU on DNA Synthesis and Cytotoxicity of Human Lymphocytes Induced by IL-2, TGF-{beta}3 and PGE2
Anticancer Res, October 1, 2009; 29(10): 3925 - 3930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Chizzolini, R. Chicheportiche, M. Alvarez, C. de Rham, P. Roux-Lombard, S. Ferrari-Lacraz, and J.-M. Dayer
Prostaglandin E2 synergistically with interleukin-23 favors human Th17 expansion
Blood, November 1, 2008; 112(9): 3696 - 3703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Comoli, F. Ginevri, R. Maccario, M. A. Avanzini, M. Marconi, A. Groff, A. Cometa, M. Cioni, L. Porretti, W. Barberi, et al.
Human mesenchymal stem cells inhibit antibody production induced in vitro by allostimulation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 1196 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Kim, M. Emi, K. Tanabe, and K. Arihiro
Tumor-Driven Evolution of Immunosuppressive Networks during Malignant Progression
Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5527 - 5536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. M. Holm, P. Aukrust, E. M. Aandahl, F. Muller, K. Tasken, and S. S. Froland
Impaired Secretion of IL-10 by T Cells from Patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency-Involvement of Protein Kinase A Type I
J. Immunol., June 1, 2003; 170(11): 5772 - 5777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
H. Yoneda, K. Miura, H. Matsushima, K. Sugi, T. Murakami, K. Ouchi, K. Yamashita, H. Itoh, T. Nakazawa, M. Suzuki, et al.
Aspirin inhibits Chlamydia pneumoniae-induced NF-{kappa}B activation, cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin E2 synthesis and attenuates chlamydial growth
J. Med. Microbiol., May 1, 2003; 52(5): 409 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Suarez, L. Mozo, and C. Gutierrez
Generation of CD4+CD45RA+ Effector T Cells by Stimulation in the Presence of Cyclic Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate- Elevating Agents
J. Immunol., August 1, 2002; 169(3): 1159 - 1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Duhant, L. Schandene, C. Bruyns, N. S. Gonzalez, M. Goldman, J.-M. Boeynaems, and D. Communi
Extracellular Adenine Nucleotides Inhibit the Activation of Human CD4+ T Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., July 1, 2002; 169(1): 15 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
X. He, C. M. Weyand, J. J. Goronzy, W. Zhong, and J. M. Stuart
Bi-directional modulation of T cell-dependent antibody production by prostaglandin E2
Int. Immunol., January 1, 2002; 14(1): 69 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. L. Clark, Z. Zeng, A. L. Langford, S. M. Bowen, and S. C. Todd
PGRL Is a Major CD81-Associated Protein on Lymphocytes and Distinguishes a New Family of Cell Surface Proteins
J. Immunol., November 1, 2001; 167(9): 5115 - 5121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
W. H. Loomis, S. Namiki, D. B. Hoyt, and W. G. Junger
Hypertonicity rescues T cells from suppression by trauma-induced anti-inflammatory mediators
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): C840 - C848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, X.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by He, X.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, J. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS