|
|
||||||||
Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have recently demonstrated that Ag-reactive
CD4+ T cells (following challenge with
conventional Ag) reside in the CD4high T cell
subpopulation (17). In these studies, following
stimulation in vitro of the draining lymph node cells from immunized
animals, there was a marked up-regulation of CD4 on the Ag-reactive
subset of T cells. Limiting dilution analysis (LDA) analyses showed
that all of the Ag-reactive CD4+ T cells could be
found within the CD4high subpopulation. More
importantly, for the studies described below, up-regulation of cell
surface expression of CD4 was also demonstrated on
CD4+ T cells sorted directly from the draining
lymph nodes of Ag-primed mice (17). Using
CD4high as a marker, it was possible to enrich
the Ag-reactive CD4+ T cell precursor frequency
in vivo from >1/10,000 to
1/30 T cells (17).
Previous studies from our laboratory had demonstrated that T cells, isolated from the islets of prediabetic NOD mice, were much more efficient in disease transfer into NOD-SCID recipients than were spleen cells from the same aged prediabetic NOD mice (18). Thus, the precursor frequency of islet-reactive CD4+ T cells was increased in the islets. Applying CD4high as a marker for recent Ag activation in the NOD mouse model, we asked whether we could identify the autoreactive CD4+ T cells within the islets. This approach would allow us to analyze the phenotype of the specific autoreactive CD4+ T cells without any requirement of prior knowledge of the self-Ag recognized.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NOD mice were obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY) and used between 11 and 13 wk of age. NOD-SCID mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and used as recipients between 4 and 6 wk of age. Only female mice were used in this study. All animals were maintained under specific pathogen-free condition in the Department of Comparative Medicine at Stanford University Medical School.
Antibodies
The GK1.5 Ab was purified from GK1.5 hybridoma supernatant on a protein G column (Pharmacia-Upjohn, Uppsala, Sweden) and dialyzed against PBS. R-PE-labeled anti-CD4 was from Caltag (South San Francisco, CA) and PharMingen (San Diego, CA). FITC-labeled anti-CD8 was from Caltag. Anti-CD25 FITC, anti-CD69 FITC, anti-CD44 FITC, biotinylated anti-CD45RB, anti-CD62L biotin, and strepavidin-allophycocyanin (APC) were all from PharMingen. Propidium iodide (PI) (Sigma) was used at 1 µg/ml to exclude dead cells.
MiniMACS purification of CD8+ cells and reconstitution of NOD-SCID mice
Single cells suspensions of freshly isolated pooled lymph node (inguinal, mesenteric, and paraaortic) and spleen cells from diabetic NOD female mice were counted and incubated with anti-CD8 magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) in PBS supplemented with 3% FCS for 20 min at 1012°C. FITC-labeled anti-CD8 Abs were added for the last 10 min. The cells were washed and purified by passage through magnetic columns according to the manufacturers recommendation. The enriched population consisted of >90% CD8+ T cells. The cells were resuspended in saline containing 50100 µg of an anti-CD4 Ab (GK1.5), and 0.51 x 106 cells were injected i.v. into NOD-SCID recipients. The mice were injected with an additional 50 µg of GK1.5 i.p. for 2 additional days. The mice were allowed to recover for at least 7 days after the last Ab injection and then screened for CD8 reconstitution and CD4 depletion by FACS analysis of PBL before CD4 T cell transfer. Typically, 7 days after reconstitution, 510% of the PBL were CD8+ and <0.6% stained for CD4+ cells, a CD4 profile that is similar to the background staining of a nonreconstituted NOD-SCID mouse.
Histological examination
The pancreata and salivary glands from NOD-SCID recipient mice were removed, fixed in 10% formaldehyde, and embedded in paraffin. Thin sections at three levels, 50 µm apart, were cut for staining with hematoxylin and eosin. The severity of infiltration was assessed by light microscopy. At least 20 islets were examined per pancreas.
Lymphocyte preparation
Each donor NOD pancreas was cannulated and perfused with collagenase P (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) dissolved in HBSS supplemented with penicillin-streptomycin, 4 mmol/liter NaHCO3 and 0.22 mg/liter BSA. Excised pancreata was incubated for 20 min at 37°C, dispersed with a 10-ml pipette, washed, passed through a strainer, and placed on a discontinuous gradient of Ficoll (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 27%, 25%, 20.5%, and 11%, to isolate the islets. The islets were removed from the 1120.5% interface, washed, and handpicked with siliconized pipettes under a dissecting microscope. The handpicked islets were dissociated into single cells by passage through a 18-gauge needle (five times) followed by 21-gauge needle (three times). Salivary gland-infiltrating lymphocytes were isolated by sectioning the donor NOD salivary glands into 3-mm pieces and incubating the segments with collagenase P (Boehringer Mannheim) dissolved in HBSS supplemented with penicillin-streptomycin, 4 mmol/liter NaHCO3 and 0.22 mg/liter BSA. After 20-min incubation the tissue was minced through a steel strainer and, after centrifugation, mononuclear cells was enriched on a Lympholyte-M gradient (Cedarlane, Hornby, Ontario, Canada).
Spleen and lymph node lymphocytes were isolated by mincing the organ with the back of a 6-ml syringe in a dish before passing through a 70-µm nylon mesh cell strainer.
Cell transfer procedure
The sorted cells were resuspended in saline containing 10% normal mouse serum (from NOD) and injected i.v. at the numbers indicated. NOD-SCID recipients were checked for glucosurea using Glucosstix (Boehringer Mannheim) every other day. If glucosurea was observed, the blood glucose was measured with a One Touch II meter (Johnson & Johnson, Milpitas, CA). Mice with glucosurea and a blood glucose >250 mg/dl were considered diabetic. Glucosurea always coincided with high blood glucose levels.
FACS sorting and FACS analysis
The isolated islet cells were resuspended in PBS containing 3% FCS (FACS medium) and stained for two-, three-, or four-color analysis with FITC-, PE-, and APC-labeled Abs using a predetermined optimal concentration for 20 min at 4°C, and washed once in FACS medium. PI was used in all samples to exclude dead cells. Before sorting, the samples were passed through a 70-µm nylon mesh. The sorting CD4high gate for islets and salivary glands was set to include the top 510% of all CD4+ cells, an the CD4normal gate was set to include CD4+ T cells whose CD4 expression was just under the mean fluorescence for the entire population (representing 20% of all CD4+ T cells). The yield from twenty 11-wk-old pancreas donors was on average 20,00030,000 CD4high cells. The yield from twenty 11-wk-old salivary gland donors was, on average, 5000 cells. Sorting CD4high from the spleen was done on the top 3%. This more stringent gate was set to ensure the enrichment of CD4 high cells with a similar CD4 expression level as on the CD4high cells from the islets.
The cells were sorted for different levels of CD4 expression on a FACStar (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). Three- and four-color analysis of surface marker expression was done on a FACScan or FACSVantage. All staining and sorting procedures were done aseptically. The data were analyzed using the Herzenberg desk facility (Stanford University), FlowJo 2.7.8 (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA), and CellQuest (Becton Dickinson) on a Power Macintosh G3 (Apple Computer, Cupertino, CA).
Analysis of cytokine mRNA by RNase protection assays (RPA)
Isolated CD4high (12 x
105) and CD4normal (2
x 105) T cells were stimulated with PMA (1
µg/ml) and ionomycin (0.25 µg/ml) (both from Sigma) for 24 h in
RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS, nonessential amino acids,
L-glutamine, sodium pyruvate, HEPES, 2-ME, and
penicillin/streptomycin in 37°C in 6% CO2.
After stimulation, the cells were washed once in ice-cold PBS and
frozen in -80°C. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen,
Valencia, CA). Probes were labeled with
[
-32P]UTP and hybridized with the isolated
RNA. The probe set used was mCK-1 (PharMingen) and it detects IL-10,
IL-4, IL-5, IL-2, IL-6, IFN-
, GADPH, and L32. After digestion of
single-stranded RNA, the protected fragments were separated by PAGE.
Controls included the probe set hybridized to tRNA only, and to tRNA
plus a pool of synthetic sense RNAs complementary to the probes set.
All steps were performed according to manufacturers
recommendation.
Analysis of cytokine mRNA by quantitative RT-PCR
Isolated CD4high (0.32 x 105) and CD4normal (0.32 x 105) T cells were stimulated with PMA and ionomycin for 2 h, and RNA was extracted as mentioned above for the RPA. The RNA sample was treated with DNase to remove all traces of genomic DNA and reverse transcribed with MultiScribe reverse transcriptase (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in the presence of hexamers, according to the manufacturers instructions.
For IL-4, IFN-
, and GAPDH, real time quantitative PCR was performed
in the ABI Prism 7700 sequence detector, which contains a Gene-Amp PCR
system R600 (PE Applied Biosystems). Reaction conditions were
programmed on a Power Macintosh 7200 (Apple Computer) linked directly
to the 7700 Sequence detector. The IL-4 and IFN-
probes were labeled
with the fluorescent reporter dye FAM (6-carboxyfluorescin, covalently
linked to the 5' end of the oligonucleotide) and a quencher, TAMRA
(6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine, attached at the 3' end via a linker
arm). The 5' end of the GAPDH probe was labeled with the fluorescent
reporter dye VIC and the 3' end was linked to the quencher, TAMRA. The
primer and probe sequences used were the following: 5'
IFN-
primer, TCCTGCGGCCTAGCTCTGA; 3' IFN-
primer,
GCCATGAGGAAGAGCT; IFN-
probe,
ACAATGAACGCTACACACTGCATCTTGGC; 5' IL-4 primer, CATCGGCATTTTGAA;
3' IL-4 primer, CGTTTGGCACATCCATCTCC; IL-4 probe,
CACAGGAGAAGGGACGCCATGCA; 5' GAPDH primer, TGCACCACCAACTGCTTA;
3' GAPDH primer, GGATGCAGGGATGATGTT; and GAPDH probe,
CAGAAGACTGTGGATGGCCCCTC. All reactions were performed using the
TaqMan Gold RT-PCR kit according the manufacturers
recommendation (PE Applied Biosystems). Whole mouse cDNA
(PharMingen) was used as standard. The detection limit of IFN-
and
IL-4 in the standard was 1 ng input of the total mouse cDNA. For the
different runs cDNA corresponding to 300-5000 cells was used. A
normalization to GAPDH was performed for each sample.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prompted by the observation that CD4high T
cells were Ag reactive following immunization with conventional Ag in
vivo (17), we asked whether it was possible to isolate
this subpopulation from an inflammatory site of an ongoing autoimmune
response. To explore this possibility, we isolated islets from
prediabetic NOD female mice (age 11 wk) and examined the CD4 expression
pattern of islet-infiltrating lymphocytes. As shown by data presented
in Fig. 1
, there was increased CD4
expression (when compared with lymph node and spleen cells from the
same mice) on a small subset of islet-infiltrating lymphocytes. This
was demonstrated by comparing the expression of CD4 on lymphocytes from
lymph nodes and spleen with the expression on islet-infiltrating T
cells. The staining of the lymph node and spleen
CD4+ T cells demonstrated a very tight homogenous
pattern, whereas the islet-infiltrating T cells displayed heterogeneity
in CD4 expression and contained a small population that displayed
increased levels of CD4 on their surface. These
"CD4high islet-infiltrating T cells"
represented
5% of all CD4+ T cells in the
islet-infiltrating population.
|
To assay the pathogenic potential of the islet-infiltrating
CD4high T cells, we performed a series of
transfers into immunodeficient NOD-SCID mice that had been previously
reconstituted with CD8+ T cells from diabetic NOD
mice. We reconstituted the recipients with CD8+ T
cells from diabetic recipients before cell transfer, because it had
been previously shown that both CD4+ and
CD8+ cells were required for transfer of diabetes
into immunodeficient NOD recipients (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Transfer of
5000 islet-infiltrating CD4high T cells induced
diabetes in 12 of 12 of the recipients within 40 days, whereas only 2
of 12 of the recipients of 5000 CD4normal
islet-infiltrating T cells developed diabetes during this time period
(Fig. 2
). Transfer of 1000
CD4high cells proved to be almost as effective as
transfer of 5000 CD4high T cells; 9 of 10
recipients of 5000 CD4high T cells developed
diabetes within 50 days following transfer. However, only 2 of 12 mice
receiving 1000 CD4normal islet-infiltrating T
cells developed diabetes within 60 days. (Fig. 2
). The difference in
diabetogenic potential of these two subpopulations of
islet-infiltrating T cells was not due to differences in their
"reconstitution" potential; mice receiving
CD4high or CD4normal
islet-infiltrating T cells displayed equal reconstitution of CD4 T
cells in peripheral lymphoid organs of the recipient mice, including
the spleen, mesenteric lymph nodes, and pancreatic lymph nodes (data
not shown). Transfer of 5000 CD4total cells led
to the development of diabetes in 5 of 7 the recipients in 60 days, but
with a delayed kinetics compared with the mice that received 5000 or
1000 CD4high T cells (Fig. 2
). None of the mice
receiving CD8 T cells only (0/18) developed diabetes during the period
of observation (56 days).
|
|
Although the mice receiving 200250 CD4high
islet-infiltrating T cells did not progress to diabetes during the time
course of this study, it was possible that the mice might have
developed islet infiltration without ß cell destruction and resultant
"diabetes." Therefore, we examined by histopathology the pancreata
of the NOD-SCID recipients that received 200250
CD4high islet-infiltrating T cells to ask whether
pancreatic-infiltrating-lymphocytes (insulitis) could be found in these
mice. As shown by data presented in Table I
and Fig. 4
, 5 of 10 mice receiving 200250
CD4high cells had intraislet infiltration. All of
the NOD-SCID mice that received 500 CD4high cells
(or more) had intraislet infiltration, whereas none of the mice
receiving CD8 cells only displayed any signs of pancreatic
infiltration. Only 6 of the 10 mice that received 5000
CD4normal and 1of 6 mice that received 1000
CD4normal islet-infiltrating T cells showed any
signs of intraislet infiltration. These data confirmed the pathogenic
potential of the CD4high islet-infiltrating T
cells, and demonstrated that it was dose dependent. Thus, transfer of
200250 CD4high islet-infiltrating T cells lead
to severe inflammation, but at least 500 CD4high
islet-infiltrating T cells were required for overt diabetes to occur
within the time frame of these studies.
|
|
Although diabetes can be easily and rapidly transferred to
recipient immunodeficient NOD mice with spleen cells from overtly
diabetic NOD mice, spleen cells from prediabetic mice are very
inefficient in transferring diabetes in the same models
(19). It is possible that this inefficiency might
be due to the low precursor frequency of islet-reactive T cells in
spleens of prediabetic NOD mice. Therefore, we sorted the
"brightest" 3% of the CD4+ cells from the
spleens of 11-wk-old NOD mice and transferred 5000 cells to CD8
reconstituted NOD-SCID mice. As shown by data presented in Table I
,
none of the mice (0/5) that received CD4high
spleen cells developed diabetes within 60 days of observation. Only 1
of 4 mice examined had signs of intraislet infiltration on
histopathological examination.
NOD mice develop lymphocyte infiltration in all major endocrine organs
including the salivary glands, adrenal glands, and the thyroid. To
determine whether NOD CD4high T cells isolated
from another site of lymphocyte infiltration were diabetogenic, we
isolated and transferred CD4high T cells from
inflamed salivary glands of 11-wk-old NOD mice. As shown by data
presented in Table I
, none of the mice (0/6) that received 1000
CD4high T cells from NOD salivary glands
developed diabetes within 60 days of transfer. Next, we compared the
infiltration pattern of the pancreas and salivary glands of the two
groups receiving either 200-1000 islet CD4high
cells or 1000 salivary gland CD4high cells.
Interestingly, there was a preferential homing to the islets of islet
CD4high cells compared with salivary gland
CD4high cells. Of the islet
CD4high cell recipients 67% displayed intraislet
infiltration (n = 24) compared with 16.7%
(n = 6) of the mice receiving salivary gland
CD4high cells. Reciprocally, we could detect a
preferential homing of salivary gland CD4high
cells to the salivary glands. Of the mice receiving salivary gland
CD4high cells, 67% (n = 6)
displayed sialitis, whereas only 25% of the islet
CD4high cell recipients showed any signs of
salivary gland infiltration.
The islet-infiltrating CD4high T cells display a memory phenotype
In our previous studies of the T cell response to a conventional
Ag, we demonstrated that, after challenge with Ag in vitro, there was a
marked shift in the cell surface expression of activation/memory
markers on CD4high T cells (17). To
further characterize the islet-infiltrating
CD4high T cells, we stained the
islet-infiltrating T cells using a panel of Abs that recognized cell
surface markers that are expressed differentially on newly activated or
on "memory" T cells. As shown by data presented in Fig. 4
, the
majority of islet-infiltrating CD4high
lymphocytes expressed the cell surface marker
CD45RBlow, characteristic of memory T cells,
compared with lymph node cells isolated from the same animals.
Moreover, islet-infiltrating CD4high lymphocytes
were also CD62Llow compared with lymph node cells
isolated from the same animals (data not shown). However, <5% of the
islet-infiltrating CD4high T cells expressed
other activation/memory markers, including CD69, CD25, and CD44 (data
not shown).
CD4high islet-infiltrating T cells display a IL-4 low, Th1 cytokine profile
It has been suggested that diabetes in the NOD mouse is a
Th1-mediated disease. Islet Ag-reactive T cell clones and lines have
been shown to produce Th1 type cytokines. Moreover, T cells isolated
from BDC2.5 TCR transgenic NOD mice are highly pathogenic if they have
been diverted toward a Th1 pathway before transfer. For these reasons,
we investigated the cytokine profile of islet-infiltrating
CD4+ T cells using an RPA. Islet-infiltrating
CD4+ T lymphocytes from 11- to 12-wk-old NOD mice
were isolated and sorted into CD4high and
CD4normal populations. The
CD4high gate was set to consist of the top 10%
of CD4+ T cells, and the
CD4normal gate was set to include
CD4+ T cells whose CD4 expression was just under
the mean fluorescence for the entire CD4 population. As shown by data
presented in Fig. 5
B, both the
CD4high and the CD4normal
subpopulations of islet-infiltrating T cells expressed IFN-
and IL-2
by RPA, but seemed to lack expression of typical Th2 cytokines such as
IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10.
|
and
IL-4-specific real time RT-PCRs were performed. As an internal control,
we used GAPDH mRNA expression. As is demonstrated by data in Fig. 6
than did the
CD4normal islet-infiltrating population. However,
there was a marked reduction in the amount of IL-4 made by the
CD4high when compared with the
CD4normal islet-infiltrating cells. The lymph
node CD4high expressed almost as much IFN-
as
the islet CD4high population, but displayed over
30-fold higher expression of IL-4. The lymph node
CD4normal cells had low expression of both
IFN-
and IL-4.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
That some CD8 reconstituted NOD-SCID mice developed diabetes after receiving islet-infiltrating CD4normal T cells could be due to several possibilities. It is possible that the CD4 cell surface expression is not truly bimodal, or there may be some CD4+ T cells that are islet-reactive but had not yet up-regulated CD4, or these cells may represent an Ag-specific population that has modulated the expression of CD4 over time. We favor the explanation that the lack of a distinct border between CD4high and CD4normal cells, as separated by the FACS, or the actual contamination of the CD4normal population by a small number of CD4high T cells during the FACS separation procedures, allowed a population of activated T cells to be present in the CD4normal population.
Interestingly, the analysis of the phenotype of the CD4
islet-infiltrating T cells revealed that both
CD4normal and CD4high
islet-infiltrating T cells displayed a relatively similar phenotype of
cell surface markers as well as cytokine profile by RPA (Th1 type).
However, the two subpopulations did not have equal pathogenic
potential. These data suggested as one possibility that, secondary to
an "inflammatory process" in the pancreas and resultant release of
cellular attractants, there was a general influx of Th1 T cells into
the islets, possibly due to inflamed tissue release of a chemokine that
attracted Th1 T cells (28). In the presence of the islet
"inflammation" among the Th1 T cells that had been recruited
relatively nonspecifically to the islets, it was possible that a small
subpopulation expressed islet-reactive TCRs and recognized islet ß
cell Ags. Due to inflammation and tissue breakdown, and, following Ag
recognition and activation, these CD4 positive T cells up-regulated
their cell surface expression of CD4. The non-self-Ag-reactive Th1
cells, also recruited to the islets by the inflammatory events, simply
represented "innocent bystanders" secunded to the lesion by
adhesion (chemokine attraction, and, presumably, could readily migrate
out of the lesion) (29). An additional possibility was
that the two subpopulations were different in the amount of cytokines
they secreted, and that the RPA was not sensitive enough to detect this
difference. Therefore, to increase the sensitivity of determination of
the cytokine mRNA expression profile, we analyzed
CD4high cells and CD4normal
cells using real time RT-PCR. Although the IFN-
mRNA expression was
slightly increased in the islet CD4high cells
compared with the islet CD4normal cells, the
amount of IL-4 secreted by the two populations was quite distinct. The
CD4high population had a marked reduction in IL-4
secretion when compared with the CD4normal
islet-infiltrating population, and both populations secreted less IL-4
than did the lymph node CD4 cells. This suggests that it may be the
lack of regulation, and not the existence of
"superpathogenic" cells within the islet
CD4high population, that makes this population
highly diabetogenic.
One unexplained phenomenon of our observations is the homing of the small population (500 cells) of islet-reactive CD4high diabetogenic T cells back to the noninflamed islets in the CD8-reconstituted NOD-SCID recipients. Moreover, we found the islet-infiltrating cells in general preferentially homed to the islets and that the salivary gland-infiltrating CD4+ T cells reinfiltrated the salivary glands. In addition, the CD8 reconstituted mice had no detectable insulitis in the absence of transferred CD4high T cells, thus there was no inflamed endothelium or injured tissue to act as an attractant. This suggests, as one possibility, that CD4high T cells, activated and/or educated in the islets, have acquired a specific islet homing activity that is not dependent upon prior inflammation of the targeted tissue. It is equally possible that the islet-reactive CD4high T cells were activated in another site in the NOD-SCID recipient, expanded, and then homed to the islets. The nature of this potential tissue specific homing is under investigation.
Our studies have provided a novel technique to isolate and study the small population of pathogenic T cells in inflamed organs of tissue-specific autoimmune diseases in the absence of knowledge of the inciting Ag. By isolating these tissue-specific autoantigen-reactive CD4high T cells, it will be possible to study their phenotype and Ag specificity.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. C. Garrison Fathman, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, R-S021, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5111. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: IDDM, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; LDA, limiting dilution analysis; NOD, nonobese diabetic; RPA, RNase protection assay; PI, propidium iodide. ![]()
Received for publication June 9, 1999. Accepted for publication September 1, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. E. Standifer, S. Stacy, E. Kraig, and A. J. Infante Discrete T Cell Populations with Specificity for a Neo-Self-Antigen Bear Distinct Imprints of Tolerance J. Immunol., March 15, 2007; 178(6): 3544 - 3550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Quinn, M. McInerney, D. Huffman, B. McInerney, S. Mayo, K. Haskins, and E. Sercarz T cells to a dominant epitope of GAD65 express a public CDR3 motif Int. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 18(6): 967 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Seddiki, B. Santner-Nanan, S. G. Tangye, S. I. Alexander, M. Solomon, S. Lee, R. Nanan, and B. F. de Saint Groth Persistence of naive CD45RA+ regulatory T cells in adult life Blood, April 1, 2006; 107(7): 2830 - 2838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Lee, Y.-G. Chen, J. Chen, P. C. Reifsnyder, D. V. Serreze, M. Clare-Salzler, M. Rodriguez, C. Wasserfall, M. A. Atkinson, and E. H. Leiter Novel Leptin Receptor Mutation in NOD/LtJ Mice Suppresses Type 1 Diabetes Progression: II. Immunologic Analysis Diabetes, January 1, 2006; 55(1): 171 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Qin, P. Chaturvedi, and B. Singh In vivo apoptosis of diabetogenic T cells in NOD mice by IFN-{gamma}/TNF-{alpha} Int. Immunol., December 1, 2004; 16(12): 1723 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. O'Connor and E. Devaney Nitric Oxide Limits the Expansion of Antigen-Specific T Cells in Mice Infected with the Microfilariae of Brugia pahangi Infect. Immun., November 1, 2002; 70(11): 5997 - 6004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Szanya, J. Ermann, C. Taylor, C. Holness, and C. G. Fathman The Subpopulation of CD4+CD25+ Splenocytes That Delays Adoptive Transfer of Diabetes Expresses L-Selectin and High Levels of CCR7 J. Immunol., September 1, 2002; 169(5): 2461 - 2465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Reijonen, E. J. Novak, S. Kochik, A. Heninger, A. W. Liu, W. W. Kwok, and G. T. Nepom Detection of GAD65-Specific T-Cells by Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Tetramers in Type 1 Diabetic Patients and At-Risk Subjects Diabetes, May 1, 2002; 51(5): 1375 - 1382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Wagner Jr., G. Vaitaitis, R. Sanderson, M. Poulin, C. Dobbs, and K. Haskins Expression of CD40 identifies a unique pathogenic T cell population in type 1 diabetes PNAS, March 19, 2002; 99(6): 3782 - 3787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Novak, S. A. Masewicz, A. W. Liu, A. Lernmark, W. W. Kwok, and G. T. Nepom Activated human epitope-specific T cells identified by class II tetramers reside within a CD4high, proliferating subset Int. Immunol., June 1, 2001; 13(6): 799 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fasso, N. Anandasabapathy, F. Crawford, J. Kappler, C. G. Fathman, and W. M. Ridgway T Cell Receptor (TCR)-mediated Repertoire Selection and Loss of TCR V{beta} Diversity during the Initiation of a CD4+ T Cell Response In Vivo J. Exp. Med., December 11, 2000; 192(12): 1719 - 1730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |