|
|
||||||||



*
Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
The Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and
The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
470-kDa DNA-PK catalytic subunit
(DNA-PKcs) protein is truncated by 83 aa (2, 3, 4, 5, 6). The block in B and T cell development that results from the SCID mutation is severe, but not absolute. Fifteen percent of SCID mice develop detectable serum Ig by the age of 5 mo, (reviewed in Ref. 1), and it is possible to show Ig and TCR gene rearrangements, even in "nonleaky" SCID mice with sufficiently sensitive assays (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). A similar T and B cell phenotype, with a leaky developmental block, has been reported for three additional mutations of the DNA-PKcs gene; two ostensibly null mutations resulting from a targeted knockout, and a third spontaneous mutation (13, 14, 15). Other studies with integrated recombination reporter vectors have also demonstrated that SCID mice and SCID lines can very infrequently form V(D)J "coding" joints, and that such joints can have an abnormal structure (16, 17, 18). However, as measured by any of the above-mentioned approaches, the frequencies with which normal coding structures arise are at least an order of magnitude lower when compared with wild-type (WT) cells. In some studies, especially those employing extrachromosomal substrates, coding joints have proven difficult to detect at all (19, 20).
The fact that SCID cells can produce coding joints, albeit at low levels, suggests that DNA-PKcs does not perform a strictly essential role in V(D)J recombination. At the same time, it is clear that this enzyme has a significant impact on the outcome of the T and B cell developmental program (21), one that clearly involves the V(D)J recombination process (9, 16, 19, 22). Clues to the possible function or functions of DNA-PK in V(D)J recombination are provided by the finding that a variety of conditions can at least partially revert the SCID phenotype. Treatments such as adoptive transfer of normal bone marrow cells into SCID mice (23), whole-body irradiation of SCID mice, (24, 25, 26), germline introduction of Ig or TCR transgenes (27, 28, 29, 30, 31), the elimination of p53 expression (32, 33), constitutive bcl2 expression (34), or mutation of Fas (35) are all reported to relieve the block in early T or B cell development to some extent. Of these, only ionizing radiation has been suggested to have a direct effect on the V(D)J recombination process itself (24, 26, 33). For other interventions, it seems likely that circumvention of apoptotic triggers, and/or the consequences of cellular selection in SCID promotes the survival of cells that would otherwise die, with no immediate impact on V(D)J joining. This raises the very real possibility that despite previous suggestions (24, 26), ionizing radiation also rescues T cell differentiation through these other means.
In particular, the case for reversion of the SCID V(D)J recombination
defect at the molecular level as made through irradiation of intact
mice (24, 26) is undermined somewhat by two observations.
One is that ionizing irradiation will partially rescue thymocyte
development not only in SCID, but also in recombination activating gene
(RAG) deficient (RAG-/-) mice (36, 37). In RAG-/- mice, which are incapable
of V(D)J recombination, irradiation clearly causes survival and
progression of cells by means that must be unrelated to V(D)J
recombination. This result raises the possibility that the radiation
effect seen in SCID is complex, indirect, and perhaps even largely
independent of the gene rearrangement process in the affected cells.
Although, for example, it has been shown that TCR-
coding joints
detected in irradiated thymocytes from SCID mice are apparently
"unselected" in that they are mostly out-of-frame
(26), this study was not designed to rule out any
selective effects of irradiation apart from those acting through the
expressed TCR-
protein. As mentioned, TCR-independent effects of
radiation on T cell differentiation are demonstrated, and these effects
unavoidably confound the interpretation of any in vivo radiation
experiment. A second observation is that whole-body irradiation is seen
to partially rescue T, but not B, cell development in SCID (Ref.
24 ; G.E.W., unpublished observations). If the principal
effect of irradiation is to overcome insufficiencies in DNA
recombination, a simplistic expectation is that both the T and B
lineages ought to exhibit partial rescue when irradiated (see Ref.
24 for further discussion).
It is of interest to know whether or not ionizing radiation reverts the SCID phenotype at the level of V(D)J recombination, because this important piece of the puzzle would help elucidate the role of DNA-PK in Ag receptor gene assembly. To support the possibility that irradiation acts on V(D)J recombination and not simply on the cellular developmental environment, it is key to demonstrate a radiation effect in cells independent of a thymic context. The extrachromosomal V(D)J recombination assay, where an artificial V(D)J recombination substrate is transfected into clonal, transformed pre-B- or pre-T-like cell lines is, in theory, ideally suited to this endeavor. Here the possibility that the appearance of a reversion of the joining defect is a consequence of the unequal expansion of subpopulations of T lineage cells in an irradiated thymus is eliminated.
Despite the potential application of the extrachromosomal recombination assay system for elucidation of the radiation effect, in practice it has been difficult to detect any coding joint formation in SCID cells by this approach. Here, modifications of the transfection procedure have allowed us to reproducibly measure SCID coding joints, and, significantly, a radiation effect independent of thymic influences, was revealed. Although irradiation had no apparent impact on the frequency with which coding joints or signal joints were found, it markedly altered the fine structure of the coding junctions. Without irradiation, coding joints had a high level of palindromic (or "P") nucleotide insertions. With irradiation, the levels of P insertion were significantly reduced. The same effect was seen for both B and T lineage SCID cell lines. Because lineage nonspecific radiation effects could be documented in a short timeframe using a clonal cell culture system, and because these effects are manifested as differences in the fine structure of the coding joints, we conclude that ionizing radiation has an impact on the V(D)J recombination mechanism itself. Implications with respect to proposed models for V(D)J recombination are discussed.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SCID 2.1 (a kind gift of Dr. R.A. Phillips, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) is an avian-murine leukemia virus (A-MuLV)-transformed pre-B cell line derived from the bone marrow of C.B-17 SCID. "WT 1-8" is our designation for the BALB/c bone marrow derived A-MuLV line, 204-1-8. This line, originally isolated by N. Rosenberg (Boston, MA) was obtained from M. Lieber (Los Angeles, CA) and is also referred to as 1-8 (19). SCID SL56, a spontaneous thymoma originally isolated by G. Bosma, was obtained from M. Lieber and has been described previously (19). SCID ST, like SCID SL56, is a spontaneous thymoma of C.B-17 SCID mice, and was the kind gift of Dr. J. Kearney (Birmingham, AL). All cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 55 µM 2-ME. To verify the DNA-PKcs status of the cell lines, RT-PCR of DNA-PKcs in the region of the SCID mutation was performed as described in (3), and the amplified bands were sequenced. The presence of a TAA codon at a position beginning with nt 12,192 (38) identified the SCID mutation in all the SCID lines (data not shown).
Extrachromosomal recombination substrates and assay
The recombination substrate plasmids (39) are shown
in Fig. 1
. pDR42 and pWTSJ
plasmids
are designed to measure coding and signal joints that form by deletion
(as described in Refs. 40 and 41). Coding and
signal joints that form by inversion were assayed with p12x23
(42). The transfection protocol was as described
previously (39), but departs in some details. In brief, 1
µg of plasmid DNA is introduced into 2 x
107 cells by exposing the cells for 10 min at
37°C to 1 ml of the following solution: 670 µl additive-free RPMI
1640, 12 µl of 20 mg/ml DEAE dextran, 50 µl 1 M Tris, pH 7.6, 1
µg DNA (1 mg/ml), brought to volume with PBS
(Ca2+ and Mg2+ free). At
the end of the incubation, cells were washed and resuspended in 10 ml
culture medium for an additional 48-h incubation. Except as indicated,
all experiments included 1 mM caffeine (43) in the culture
medium subsequent to transfection. For the irradiation experiments,
cultures were removed from the incubator 4 h after transfection
and either irradiated with 100 cGy from a cesium source or left
unirradiated. The irradiated and unirradiated cultures were then
returned to the incubator and cultured for another 44 h. The cells
were then harvested and the plasmid DNA was extracted by an alkaline
lysis procedure as described previously (39). The
recovered DNA was digested with DpnI to remove unreplicated
molecules, and an aliquot was transformed into bacteria (DH10B; Life
Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Bacteria were plated on agar media
containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin (amp) alone or, for selection of
recombinants, on plates containing both amp and chloramphenicol (cam)
(11 µg/ml for pWTSJ
and p12x23; 50 µg/ml for pDR42). The ratio
of the recombinants (colonies on cam + amp plates) to the total
(colonies on amp) is called the R value and is a measure of the
frequency of recombination for a given plasmid in a given cell
line.
|
Cells were irradiated at the Ontario Cancer Institute with a 137Cs source calibrated by the Radiation Division at the Department of Medical Biophysics. One fixed source delivered 53 rad/min; another movable source allowed variable dose rates. For all experiments, the final dose was 100 cGy.
Analysis of recombinants
DNA was prepared from individual ampr plus
camr colonies using standard procedures. Plasmids
were analyzed by restriction digestion, DNA sequencing with Pharmacia
T7 kits (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ), or both. The primers used for DNA
sequence analysis are listed in Table I
.
|
Colony assay
A colony formation assay was used to determine the survival of the mouse cell lines after irradiation. The lines were irradiated with 0500 cGy using the cesium source described above. All cells were left at room temperature during the irradiation. Cells were then plated in RPMI 1640 media containing 0.3% Bacto-Agar (Difco, Detroit, MI) in Falcon 3002, 60-mm plates (Becton Dickinson, San Diego, CA) at from 200 to 1000 cells per plate. Colonies were counted 7 days later. The plating efficiency of unirradiated lines varied from 0.4 to 0.7.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The formation of signal or coding joints was measured with the
plasmids pWTSJ or pDR42, respectively (Fig. 1
).The calculated "R
values" (a measurement of recombination proficiency; see
Materials and Methods) for WT and SCID cells are shown in
Table II
. In WT 1-8, signal joints were
formed with a mean R value of 4.1. As shown, there was variability in
the R value determinations; however, the mean R value for signal joint
formation in the WT cell line was at least 4-fold higher than any of
the tested SCID cells. In the case of coding joints, WT 1-8 exhibited a
mean R value at least 30-fold higher than the SCID cell lines. Of note
was that all three SCID lines produced coding joints at a low but
measurable frequency in every experiment. This contrasts with previous
studies employing extrachromosomal recombination substrates, where
coding joints have been particularly difficult to detect (19, 20). Two of the lines tested here (WT 1-8 and SCID SL56) were
the same as in previous reports and the genotype of the cells was
verified (Materials and Methods). The reason that we have
been able to reproducibly detect low levels of coding joints in SCID
cells by the extrachromosomal assay is not known but may be due to the
coding joint construct, pDR42, which is different from those used in
the other studies. Also, the transfection protocol was modified to
eliminate the usual hypotonic shock (see Materials and
Methods). The detection of low-level coding joint formation in
SCID cells with an extrachromosomal assay is fully consistent with the
effects of the SCID mutation based upon analyses of the endogenous Ig
or TCR loci in mice (7, 12). The fact that coding joints
can be detected allowed us to use this approach to explore the
radiation effect on SCID V(D)J recombination.
|
Coding joints formed by V(D)J recombination are characterized by variable deletion of coding sequences adjacent to the recombination site, by additions of "N" nucleotides, and by the appearance of "P" inserts (reviewed in Ref. 43). Deletions are associated with the processing that accompanies nonhomologous end-joining in general, although not much is known in detail about how they arise. N nucleotides result from the elongation of cut coding ends by the nontemplate-dependent polymerase, TdT. P nucleotides are short palindromic junctional inserts that appear when DNA hairpin ends are joined in cells (44). In V(D)J recombination, it has been shown that the site-specific proteins responsible for cleavage, RAG1 and RAG2, create coding end intermediates with hairpin termini (22, 45). Palindromic nucleotides are copied from the flap generated when a hairpin end has been opened through introduction of a single-strand nick positioned on one side, rather than exactly at the hairpin terminus. P nucleotides are only observed in VJ or VDJ junctions that contain a full-length (apparently untrimmed) coding end (reviewed in Ref. 46).
Whereas coding joints are typified by variability, signal joints are far less irregular. Deletion of signal end sequences and addition of N regions at the joint are not commonly seen. P nucleotide insertions do not occur at all in signal joints (47), and this feature corresponds to the fact that unlike the coding ends, signal end cleavage products produced by RAG1/2 do not have hairpin termini (22, 45).
A structural comparison of randomly selected coding joints and signal
joints isolated either from WT 1-8 or from the SCID cell lines is
presented in Figs. 2
and
3. With respect to signal joint
structure, over 60% of those isolated from SCID cells contained N
regions. The SCID recombinants were otherwise normal in appearance
(Fig. 2
).
|
|
Another measurable difference between SCID and WT coding joints could be found in the length of P insertions. In the WT 1-8 sample, no P insertion was longer than 2 bp, consistent with more extensive studies of endogenous and extrachromosomally derived WT coding joints, where P nucleotide insertions longer than 23 bp were quite rare (47). In contrast, among the SCID junctions, half of the P insertions had lengths between 3 and 10 bp. The observation that P insertions in SCID coding joints, in addition to being more frequent, are abnormally long has been noted previously (7, 10, 51, 52).
In summary, we find that we can detect coding joints created by SCID
lymphoid lines with a transient extrachromosomal assay, and that such
junctions exhibit three quantifiable defects. The frequency of coding
joints is depressed 10- to 100-fold compared with WT levels, P
nucleotide insertions are more prevalent, and P nucleotide insertions
are longer in SCID. All of these features, which we are now able to
monitor, are consistent with previous reports. One aspect of SCID
coding joints that is not well-reflected in the extrachromosomal assay
was the feature of excessive deletion (Fig. 3
). Large deletions of the
coding ends within SCID joints are observed in some, but not all,
studies (reviewed in Ref. 43). It could be that extensive
deletions may be counter-selected in the extrachromosomal assay, where
there are limits to the losses that occur at either "coding end"
without removing necessary elements of the plasmid. However, for
reasons to be discussed below, it is also possible that excessive
deletion is perhaps not a dominant feature of the SCID defect.
Signal joints appear to be less affected by the SCID mutation, but even
so, there was evidence for a depression in the frequency of their
formation (Table II
), as well as for excessive N addition (Fig. 2
). In
general, the level of N addition found among signal joints has been
shown to correlate with variable TdT levels, although the highest
frequency of N insertion among tested WT cell lines was about 25%
(53). As shown (Fig. 2
), well over 50% of the signal
joints from the SCID lines had N nucleotide insertions. The high level
of N insertion along with the somewhat lower frequency with which
signal joints are recovered point to the possibility of an impact on
signal joint formation that can be scored by the extrachromosomal
assay. Another suggestion that both signal and coding joint formation
are detectably affected by the SCID mutation is that, even with our
current protocol, which allows us to detect coding joints with the
pDR32 deletion-type substrate, we have never been able to isolate
inversional rearrangements using the p12x23 substrate (Fig. 1
and Table III
). The extreme deficit in inversional
joins for SCID is consistent with previous reports (19, 20).
|
In SCID mice, low levels of ionizing irradiation lead to the
emergence of thymocytes with TCR-ß and TCR-
rearrangements
(24, 26). We reasoned that if irradiation directly
affected V(D)J recombination, we should be able to detect differences
in irradiated vs nonirradiated SCID cells through use of
extrachromosomal substrates.
Coding and signal joints generated in SCID cells with and without
irradiation were examined in the short-term recombination assay (Fig. 4
). Each of the several signature
features of SCID junctions discussed above was examined under the two
experimental conditions. Cell lines transfected with pDR42 or pWTSJ
received a dose of 100 cGy of radiation from a cesium source 4 h
posttransfection, and, as in our standard protocol, DNA was recovered
from transfected cells 48 h posttransfection. For each data point,
parallel cultures were treated identically except that they were not
irradiated.
|
In neither the WT 1-8 cells nor the SCID cells was there any consistent
relationship between the levels with which coding joints or signal
joints could be recovered and whether or not a sample had been
irradiated (Table IV
). This suggests that
if there is a class of SCID coding or signal joints with deletions
larger than can be scored with the extrachromosomal assay, either
irradiation did not change this feature or, if it did, such junctions
must not have comprised a substantial fraction of the total.
Inversional joining with p12x23 was not examined in these experiments
due to the lack of any products in SCID cells in the absence of
irradiation. In other studies with SCID cells (using a different A-MuLV
transformed SCID cell line and a related but nonidentical protocol),
100 cGy irradiation had not restored inversional joining with p12x23
(S.M.L., unpublished observations).
|
|
The p value was calculated by treating each unique sequence within a transfection as a single independent recombinant, even if a particular junction had been isolated multiple times. Of concern was whether this approach might systematically under-represent recurrent sequences that were in reality independent recombination events, perhaps giving a misleading impression of a radiation effect. Therefore, we tested the relationship between irradiated and unirradiated samples where every isolate was scored as an independent recombinant. In this case, the p value was still significant (<0.0001). Neither method of scoring can be taken to reflect the true situation, which doubtless lies between these two extremes (i.e., some but not all multiples are independent); however, by either method a significant difference with respect to P insertion upon irradiation is observed.
An additional concern in this evaluation arises with respect to
nucleotides that can be assigned to either end. These are shown in
parentheses (for P nucleotides) and as underlinings (for flank
sequences). We have assigned each nucleotide in Fig. 4
in a fashion
that minimizes the number of P-associated ends. Assignments can instead
be made so as to maximize the number of P-associated ends. When this is
done and the p values are recalculated as above, either
taking unique sequences as independent or taking all isolates as
independent, the association between P nucleotide insertions and
irradiation remains significant (p = 0.0403 and
p = 0.0006, respectively). Thus, even though there is
unavoidable ambiguity in the assignment of P nucleotides as well as
uncertainties with respect to independence within a given sample, none
of the possible alternatives appeared to eradicate the significance of
the radiation effect.
Ionizing radiation did not cause a complete reversion to a normal
coding joint structure. Even though the incidence of P insertion was
reduced, the average length of P nucleotide insertions (Table V
) was
4.1 nt, longer than for a WT cell (see data for WT 1-8, Table V
and
Ref. 47). Other irregularities in the SCID junctions were
apparent in both irradiated and nonirradiated samples. For several
junctions it was evident that cleavage at one of the recombinant signal
sequences (RSS) had not been site-specific, because the recombination
site was either 3' of its normal position at the upstream flank or 5'
of the usual site in the downstream flank (see Fig. 4
). The average
number of base pairs lost from junctions wasnot excessive without
irradiation (2.6 bp per end), and this value, if anything, increased
with irradiation (5.4 bp). As mentioned above (see also Fig. 3
),
excessive deletion was not a global property of SCID coding joints; and
although a few recombinants showed evidence of abnormal deletions where
30 to over 100 bp were lost at the junction, such examples were found
in both treated and untreated samples. Another feature that indicated
that irradiation only incompletely compensated for the SCID defect was
the inclusion of DNA sequence at the junction that originated either
from the genome or from another part of the recombination substrate
(see Fig. 4
). The capture of sequences at recombinant junctions that
preexist either in the vector backbone or in the genome of the
transfected cell has been reported for nonhomologous end-joining in
other experiments in which plasmid DNA is transiently introduced into
cells (54, 55). However, this type of anomaly is not
observed in WT coding joints and did not vary with irradiation.
Two other observations should be mentioned. One is that for WT 1-8, the
fine structure of signal joints (not shown) and coding joints (Fig. 4
, Table V
) was unaffected by irradiation. Thus, the impact that
irradiation has on coding joint structure, as measured with the
extrachromosomal assay, appears to be limited to cells with the SCID
mutation. A second observation is that, because the biological
consequences of radiation are known to reflect not only the total dose
of radiation but also the rate at which it is delivered
(56), we obtained samples where dose rates had been varied
from 13 to 109 rad/min. No consistent trends with respect to P
nucleotide addition (or any other feature of coding joint structure)
were observed as a result (Fig. 4
, Table V
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Before this demonstration, it was possible that all of T cell
developmental consequences of irradiation of newborn mice with defects
in early T/B cell differentiation were in fact independent of V(D)J
recombination. This possibility was indicated by the demonstration that
for RAG-/- animals, where maturation of
thymocytes from a double negative to a double positive phenotype is
blocked as in SCID (21, 57, 58), the block is overcome by
irradiation (36, 37). In the case of
RAG-/- mice, radiation clearly can foster the
progression of T cell progenitors that are unable to carry out V(D)J
recombination. This feature, in combination with the fact that SCID
cells are able to generate coding joints, albeit at a low level, could
well account for an increase in detected TCR-ß rearrangements
(24, 25) or TCR-
(26) rearrangements in
thymocyte DNA after irradiation. For RAG-/-
mice, radiation effects are more difficult to demonstrate in B than T
lineage cells (36), and, perhaps not coincidentally, a T
lineage-restricted radiation response is observed in SCID mice. The
imbalanced effect on B vs T cell differentiation in both cases could
indicate that the irradiation may act largely through thymus-related
processes and in both cases may be independent of V(D)J recombination.
However, according to the present study, a specific, direct effect on
the coding joints formed in irradiated T as well as B lineage SCID
cells is in fact demonstrated. The irradiation effect is documented in
a nondevelopmental system, in a short-term assay, in the absence of any
thymic influence, and with genetically unmodified, cloned, SCID cell
lines as maintained and treated in culture. Therefore, in SCID,
irradiation has an effect that is independent of its developmental
impact.
The significance of this observation with respect to the molecular mechanism of V(D)J recombination can be appreciated in light of two findings. One is that the same proteins responsible for site-specific recognition and cleavage of the RSS in V(D)J recombination, RAG1 and RAG2, are capable, in vitro, of introducing nicks near the tips of hairpin coding ends (59, 60). The second finding is that RAG1/2 is not the exclusive agent for hairpin opening in cells. It has been shown that SCID cells are still competent for hairpin end-joining, and that this takes place via a hairpin nicking activity that exists in both lymphoid and nonlymphoid cell types (44, 55). A distinguishing characteristic of the "non-RAG" hairpin-opening activity is that hairpins are opened in a way that often generates long (>3 bp) P nucleotide insertions (44, 55). Although it has not yet been proved which activity is responsible for coding end resolution in vivo, the fact that RAG1/2 has an efficient hairpin opening function and in addition cuts in a manner consistent with the small size and low frequency of P addition in V(D)J coding joints, suggests that under normal circumstances RAG 1/2 is indeed the physiological "coding end nickase."
We propose that in T and B cells, a key role of DNA-PK is to ensure that the coding ends and signal ends, as first created after site-specific cleavage, remain in proximity to one another. Without a fully functional DNA-PKcs, as is the case in SCID, a postcleavage complex comprised of the RAG proteins and the four cleaved DNA ends is not stable. RAG1/2 proteins are bound to the signal ends after cleavage (61, 62, 63, 64), so that if coding and signal ends are allowed to drift apart at this stage of the recombination process, proximity of the hairpin intermediates and the RAG nuclease would not be maintained. As a result, SCID cells are dependent upon a default, non-RAG hairpin opening function for coding joint formation. We take the presence of the long P insertions in SCID as symptomatic of just this situation, where coding ends are not being opened by RAG1/2, but rather, by the non-RAG hairpin nicking activity. On this view, irradiation of SCID cells induces a response that once again allows RAG1/2 to open at least some of the hairpin coding ends.
By the above model, DNA-PK could be serving as a scaffold to hold coding ends and RAG1/2 together. One could also suppose that DNA-PK indirectly accomplishes this function by modifying another protein or by ensuring "proximity" in a temporal rather than spatial sense. In any case, the ultimate outcome is that without functional DNA-PK, RAG-mediated hairpin opening will not readily take place. The role of facilitating RAG-mediated hairpin opening may be what distinguishes DNA-PK function from that of the Ku proteins in V(D)J recombination. Although Ku70 and Ku80, along with DNA-PKcs, comprise DNA-PK, there is mounting evidence that the Ku70 and Ku80 proteins have functions apart from those they serve as DNA-PK components (13, 15, 65, 66). Viewed simplistically, it may be that DNA-PK helps maintain the proximity of signal ends and coding ends in particular (facilitating hairpin opening), whereas Ku stabilizes end-to-end interactions in general (facilitating all facets of end-joining).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gillian E. Wu, Ontario Cancer Institute, Room 8-113, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2 M9, Canada. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Address correspondence and report requests to Dr. Susanna Lewis, Immunology Department, University of Toronto, 1 Kings College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8 Canada. E-mail address: ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DNA-PK, DNA-dependent protein kinase; DNA-PKcs, DNA-PK catalytic subunit; RAG, recombination activating gene; CJ, coding joint; SJ, signal joint; WT, wild type; A-MuLV, avian-murine leukemia virus; amp, ampicillin; cam, chloramphenicol; RSS, recombination signal sequence. ![]()
Received for publication June 25, 1999. Accepted for publication August 25, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
locus of mouse thymocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4455.
gene recombination. Genes Dev. 5:1357.
-irradiated scid mice. J. Exp. Med. 184:1.
-irradiation induces differentiation of CD4-/CD8- into CD4+/CD8+ thymocytes without T cell receptor ß rearrangement in recombinase activation gene 2-/- mice. J. Exp. Med. 180:1517.
light-chain recombination signal sequences mediate recombination more frequently than those of
light chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:10721.
and
gene junctional sequences in SCID mice: excessive P nucleotide insertion. J. Exp. Med. 174:769.
and
gene rearrangements in SCID thymocytes: similarity to those in normal thymocytes. J. Immunol. 147:4351.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Rooney, F. W. Alt, D. Lombard, S. Whitlow, M. Eckersdorff, J. Fleming, S. Fugmann, D. O. Ferguson, D. G. Schatz, and J. Sekiguchi Defective DNA Repair and Increased Genomic Instability in Artemis-deficient Murine Cells J. Exp. Med., March 3, 2003; 197(5): 553 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Williams, I. Grandal, D. J. Vesprini, U. Wojtyra, J. S. Danska, and C. J. Guidos Irradiation Promotes V(D)J Joining and RAG-Dependent Neoplastic Transformation in SCID T-Cell Precursors Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2001; 21(2): 400 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Agard and S. M. Lewis Postcleavage Sequence Specificity in V(D)J Recombination Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2000; 20(14): 5032 - 5040. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |