|
|
||||||||
Department of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tolerance to self is established through a number of mechanisms including deletion of self-specific cells in the thymus (1, 2, 3), and T cell deletion (4), T cell indifference (5, 6, 7), and clonal anergy (8, 9) in the periphery. CD4+ CD45RB high-density (CD45RBhigh)3 cells from an untreated murine donor (CD45RChigh in the rat) are capable of causing clinical signs of colitis (10, 11, 12, 13, 14), diabetes (15), and thyroiditis (16). In all cases where CD45RBhigh cells have been shown to cause autoimmunity, CD4+ CD45RB low-density (CD45RBlow) cells prevent the induction of the disease (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16). Rejection of pancreas allografts is known to be induced by CD4+ T cells (17, 18, 19, 20). Moreover, murine recipients of MHC-mismatched allografts are prevented from rejecting them by treatment with a CD45RB-specific mAb that blocks the activity of CD45RBhigh cells (mAb) (21, 22). These data would suggest that the same cell subset, the CD4+ CD45RBhigh cell subset, that causes diabetes, colitis, and thyroiditis is also involved in allograft rejection.
CD45RB is a transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase expressed on leukocytes and involved in T lymphocyte activation (23). Its density on T lymphocytes has been used to separate T cells into functionally distinct subsets that have either pathological or nonpathological activity (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16). In addition, although not an absolute marker for the distinction of T cells into Ag-experienced (memory, CD45RBlow) cells and Ag-inexperienced (naive, CD45RBhigh) cells, in combination with two other cell surface molecules, CD62L and CD44, it has been used to identify such subsets (24, 25, 26, 27, 28). We have investigated the possibility that CD4+ CD45RBhigh cells are sufficient to cause allograft rejection and that CD4+ C45RBlow cells are capable of inhibiting that rejection process.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
C57BL/6J (C57BL/6, H-2b) adult mice and BALB/cByJ (BALB/c, H-2d) neonates were obtained from the Scripps Breeding Colony (La Jolla, CA). C57BL/6J-SCID/SzJ (C57BL/6-SCID, H-2b) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME).
Grafting of neonatal pancreata
Pancreata of BALB/c (H-2d) neonates were grafted under the kidney capsules of C57BL/6-SCID males (H-2b).
Histological assessment
Grafts were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded
in paraffin. Sections (4 µm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin
for histological examination or were tested for the presence of insulin
by immunohistochemistry as described (29). The area
encompassed by islets and cellular infiltration was measured using a
Leica Image Processing and Analyzing System (Q500 MC; Leica, Cambridge,
U.K.). Statistical analysis was performed using InStat version 2.0 for
Macintosh. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, then the Bonferroni Multiple
Comparison Test (30). A p value
0.05 is
considered significant.
Cellular infiltration
In some experiments mice will receive two grafts. The first is given at the time of the cell infusion; the second is given 6 wk later. For first grafts, those that were scored positive for cellular infiltrates were infiltrated in 75100% of the tissue. Those grafts that were scored negative for cellular infiltrates showed 0% cellular infiltration. For second grafts, those that were scored positive for cellular infiltrates showed infiltration in 12100% of the graft. Grafts which scored negative for cellular infiltrates showed 0% infiltration.
Cell purification
Spleen cells from 2- to 4-mo-old C57BL/6 male mice were prepared
for single cell suspensions. RBC were removed with lysing buffer
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and the remaining spleen cells were resuspended
in PBS with 1% FBS (Intergen, Purchase, NY). Splenocytes were labeled
with a PE-conjugated CD4-specific mAb, GK1.5 (Becton Dickinson,
Mountain View, CA) (31), and a FITC-conjugated
CD45RB-specific mAb, MB23G2 (PharMingen, La Jolla, CA)
(32), and sorted under high speed on a FACSVantage SE with
TurboSort (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, Mountain View,
CA). The CD45RBhigh and
CD45RBlow populations are defined as the
brightest-staining 30% and dullest-staining 15% of the
CD4+ cells, respectively. All cell populations
were sampled and analyzed using FACSCalibur with CELLQuest version 3.2
software (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems) to determine the
purity of the sorted populations (Fig. 1
). CD4+
CD45RBhigh and CD4+
CD45RBlow populations used were >98%
CD4+ (data not shown). Cell subsets were washed
in PBS once after sorting but before i.v. injection into recipients.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine whether CD45RBhigh cells can
cause the rejection of a pancreas allograft, C57BL/6J-SCID mice were
grafted with a pancreas from a 1-day-old BALB/c donor and infused with
0.25 x 106 CD4+
CD45RBhigh cells, 0.25 x
106 CD4+
CD45RBlow cells, or no cells. The grafts were
assessed histologically, and the area encompassed by islets and
cellular infiltration was determined. C57BL/6-SCID mice that were
infused with CD4+
CD45RBhigh cells rejected 70% of the allografts
within 3 wk after transplantation (Fig. 2
a). The grafts contained
massive cellular infiltration (Fig. 2
e) and a reduction in
islet area compared with the group that received either
CD45RBlow cells (p <
0.01) or no cells (p < 0.05, Fig. 2
f). In contrast, only 1 of 10 of the grafts harvested from
mice that received an equal number of CD4+
CD45RBlow cells displayed any signs of rejection
(Fig. 2
b). As expected, none of the grafts (0 of 7) from
mice that did not receive a cell infusion showed signs of rejection
(Fig. 2
c). The infusion of fewer CD4+
CD45RBhigh cells (0.125 x
106) resulted in a much lower incidence of
allograft rejection (data not shown). In contrast, the infusion of
0.5 x 106 CD45RBhigh
cells resulted in a similar incidence of rejection as with 0.25 x
106 cells (data not shown). Because we were
interested in determining whether rejection could be inhibited by
CD4+ CD45RBlow cells, we
have decided to use the minimum number of cells required to give a
consistently high incidence of rejection. This number is 0.25 x
106. Therefore, in subsequent experiments
0.25 x 106 CD4+
CD45RBhigh cells will be used.
|
Having established that CD4+
CD45RBlow cells were substantially less efficient
at causing allograft rejection than CD45RBhigh
cells, we determined whether the CD45RBlow
population had the capacity to prevent the
CD45RBhigh population from rejecting foreign
tissue. The experiment was set up in the same way as above but with an
additional group infused with both CD45RBhigh
cells and CD45RBlow cells. A 1:1 ratio of high
(0.25 x 106) to low (0.25 x
106), and a 2:1 ratio of high (0.25 x
106) to low (0.125 x
106) were used with similar results. Only the
data for the 2:1 ratio are shown. Pancreas allografts in mice that had
received a mixture of CD45RBhigh and
CD45RBlow cells (Fig. 2
d) were
morphologically similar to those grafts in the groups that received
CD45RBlow cells only (Fig. 2
b) or no
cells (Fig. 2
c); that is, no signs of rejection were
evident. Pancreas grafts from mice that had received
CD45RBhigh and CD45RBlow
cells displayed a significant increase in islet area compared with
grafts from mice that had received CD45RBhigh
cells only (p < 0.05). Therefore, these data
suggest that CD4+ cells expressing low levels of
CD45RB are able to prevent allograft rejection mediated by
CD45RBhigh cells.
Pancreas allografts in recipients of a CD4+ CD45RBhigh and CD45RBlow cells are tolerant of graft Ags at 10 wk after grafting
The data shown thus far are taken at 3 wk after grafting.
Therefore, it was important to determine whether allograft protection
mediated by CD45RBlow cells was maintained for
longer periods and whether the recipient was then rendered tolerant of
graft Ags. Tolerance was tested using the classical method of placing a
second graft into the recipient. Specifically, C57BL/6-SCID recipients
were infused with a 1:1 ratio of CD45RBlow and
CD45RBhigh cells, low-density cells only, or no
cells. The first graft was placed 1 day before the cell infusion. The
second graft, also a pancreas graft from a BALB/c donor, was placed
under the contralateral kidney 6 wk later, and subsequently all grafts
were removed for histologic examination after an additional 4 wk (see
Fig. 3
for time course of treatment).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data confirm the finding that the CD4+ CD45RBlow cell subset is a regulatory cell subset capable of preventing pathological responses. It also extends these findings to show that the regulatory cells do not distinguish between self-Ag and foreign MHC Ag. This is in contrast to the published data which have suggested that the presence of self-Ag is critical to the development and function of the regulatory cells (16). The ability of CD45RBlow cells to regulate the response to foreign MHC Ags, therefore, might seem unexpected. However, this ability might reflect the high frequency with which T cells respond to foreign MHC Ags (33) and the consequent high frequency with which any T cell subset (including CD4+ CD45RBlow cells) might cross-react with foreign MHC Ags. Alternatively, a specific Ag might not be necessary for the CD45RBlow cells to function in a regulatory manner in this transplantation model. It is also possible that the CD45RBlow cells develop their regulatory function after contact with transplantation Ag in the grafted recipient.
There are a number of possibilities as to the mechanism by which the CD45RBlow cells prevent the CD45RBhigh cells from rejecting the allograft. They may prevent homing of the high cells to the graft. In this regard, we found that second grafts of recipients of CD45RBhigh and CD45RBlow cells display cellular infiltration within 4 wk of grafting, even though they contained an islet area equivalent to those of grafts from mice that received CD45RBlow cells only. This observation might indicate that the CD45RBlow cells are able to prevent naive cells, but not primed cells, from infiltrating the graft. Cellular infiltration was not observed in the first (established) grafts. Alternatively, the CD45RBlow cells might prevent priming of the high cells to the graft Ags, or they might affect the effector capacity of the graft-Ag-specific CD45RBhigh cells so that they are no longer pathogenic. Finally, the CD45RBlow cells might render the graft less immunogenic. Such effects might occur through cell-mediated events or through soluble mediators (16, 34, 35).
In summary, CD4+ CD45RBhigh cells are sufficient to induce pancreas allograft rejection. In contrast, CD4+ CD45RBlow cells prevent CD4+ CD45RBhigh cells from causing rejection. In the model described here the CD45RBlow cells are purified from a mouse that has not been previously immunized with the transplantation Ags in question. In addition, the ratio of CD45RBhigh to CD45RBlow cells used in the experiments described here was 2:1, which is the same as the ratio normally present in the spleen of untreated mice and the same as the ratio used to prevent autoimmune disorders (10, 11, 12, 13); this suggests that in this model the mechanism that prevents autoimmunity also prevents allograft rejection. In the context that fully immunocompetent mice do reject pancreas allografts whereas they do not normally show signs of autoimmunity, we have drawn the following series of possible conclusions: 1) in a fully immunocompetent animal, CD4+ CD45RBlow cells do not inhibit the ability of a greater number of CD4+ CD45RBhigh cells from rejecting an allograft; 2) CD4+ CD45RBlow cells do not inhibit the ability of other T and B cell subsets from causing rejection of an allograft; 3) in an immunocompetent mouse, a cell subset other than, or as well as, the CD4+ CD45RBlow cell subset prevents autoimmune disorders but not allograft rejection; or 4) the immunocompromised recipient model is unusually susceptible to the effect of CD4+ CD45RBlow cells. Further studies will indicate which, if any, of these possibilities is true.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Joanna D. Davies, Department of Immunology, IMM-23, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CD45RBhigh, CD45RB high density; CD45RBlow, CD45RB low density. ![]()
Received for publication July 8, 1999. Accepted for publication August 30, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. H. Wang, G.-H. Chen, Y. Fan, M. Van Antwerp, and J. R. Baker Jr. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Inhibits Experimental Autoimmune Thyroiditis by the Expansion of CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells Endocrinology, April 1, 2009; 150(4): 2000 - 2007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Y. Jen, M. Campo, H. He, S. S. Makani, G. Velasco, D. M. Rothstein, D. L. Perkins, and P. W. Finn CD45RB Ligation Inhibits Allergic Pulmonary Inflammation by Inducing CTLA4 Transcription J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 4212 - 4218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chen, N. Zhang, S. Fu, B. Schroppel, Q. Guo, A. Garin, S. A. Lira, and J. S. Bromberg CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T-Cells Inhibit the Islet Innate Immune Response and Promote Islet Engraftment. Diabetes, April 1, 2006; 55(4): 1011 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sanchez-Fueyo, S. Sandner, A. Habicht, C. Mariat, J. Kenny, N. Degauque, X. X. Zheng, T. B. Strom, L. A. Turka, and M. H. Sayegh Specificity of CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cell Function in Alloimmunity J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 329 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P Hickman and L. A Turka Homeostatic T cell proliferation as a barrier to T cell tolerance Phil Trans R Soc B, September 29, 2005; 360(1461): 1713 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. V. Aruna, M. Sela, and E. Mozes Suppression of myasthenogenic responses of a T cell line by a dual altered peptide ligand by induction of CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells PNAS, July 19, 2005; 102(29): 10285 - 10290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Rushbrook, S. M. Ward, E. Unitt, S. L. Vowler, M. Lucas, P. Klenerman, and G. J. M. Alexander Regulatory T Cells Suppress In Vitro Proliferation of Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells during Persistent Hepatitis C Virus Infection J. Virol., June 15, 2005; 79(12): 7852 - 7859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gregori, P. Mangia, R. Bacchetta, E. Tresoldi, F. Kolbinger, C. Traversari, J. M. Carballido, J. E. de Vries, U. Korthauer, and M.-G. Roncarolo An anti-CD45RO/RB monoclonal antibody modulates T cell responses via induction of apoptosis and generation of regulatory T cells J. Exp. Med., April 18, 2005; 201(8): 1293 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Smart, P. S. Foster, M. E. Rothenberg, T. J. V. Higgins, and S. P. Hogan A Plant-Based Allergy Vaccine Suppresses Experimental Asthma Via an IFN-{gamma} and CD4+CD45RBlow T Cell-Dependent Mechanism J. Immunol., August 15, 2003; 171(4): 2116 - 2126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Molano, A. Pileggi, T. Berney, R. Poggioli, E. Zahr, R. Oliver, C. Ricordi, D. M. Rothstein, G. P. Basadonna, and L. Inverardi Prolonged Islet Allograft Survival in Diabetic NOD Mice by Targeting CD45RB and CD154 Diabetes, April 1, 2003; 52(4): 957 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Sutherland, B. S. McKenzie, Y. Zhan, A. J. Corbett, A. Fox-Marsh, H. M. Georgiou, L. C. Harrison, and A. M. Lew Anti-CD45RB antibody deters xenograft rejection by modulating T cell priming and homing Int. Immunol., August 1, 2002; 14(8): 953 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Graca, S. Thompson, C.-Y. Lin, E. Adams, S. P. Cobbold, and H. Waldmann Both CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- Regulatory Cells Mediate Dominant Transplantation Tolerance J. Immunol., June 1, 2002; 168(11): 5558 - 5565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sanchez-Fueyo, M. Weber, C. Domenig, T. B. Strom, and X. X. Zheng Tracking the Immunoregulatory Mechanisms Active During Allograft Tolerance J. Immunol., March 1, 2002; 168(5): 2274 - 2281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. I. Kingsley, M. Karim, A. R. Bushell, and K. J. Wood CD25+CD4+ Regulatory T Cells Prevent Graft Rejection: CTLA-4- and IL-10-Dependent Immunoregulation of Alloresponses J. Immunol., February 1, 2002; 168(3): 1080 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Ng, P. J. Duggan, F. Ponchel, G. Matarese, G. Lombardi, A. D. Edwards, J. D. Isaacs, and R. I. Lechler Human CD4+CD25+ cells: a naturally occurring population of regulatory T cells Blood, November 1, 2001; 98(9): 2736 - 2744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hara, C. I. Kingsley, M. Niimi, S. Read, S. E. Turvey, A. R. Bushell, P. J. Morris, F. Powrie, and K. J. Wood IL-10 Is Required for Regulatory T Cells to Mediate Tolerance to Alloantigens In Vivo J. Immunol., March 15, 2001; 166(6): 3789 - 3796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |