|
|
||||||||
B and AP-1 trans-Activation in Response to Minimal TCR Engagement by a Partial Agonist in Naive CD8 T Cells1


*
Centre dImmunologie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (INSERM-CNRS) de Marseille-Luminy, Marseille, France; and
Section of Immunobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06517
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
as well as IL-2
and cell proliferation were observed in response to wild-type Ag,
whereas mutant Ag induced only IFN-
. DNA binding and reporter gene
assays showed that the response to mutant Ag involved NF-
B, but not
AP-1 activation, whereas wild-type Ag activated both transcription
factors. Increasing the contribution of costimulatory signals by using
LPS-activated APCs partially corrected the activation by mutant Ag,
because proliferation and weak IL-2 production could be measured. This
also led to AP-1 activation, albeit with delayed kinetics, in response
to mutant Ag. To explain how engagement of the same TCR by distinct
ligands results in different T cell responses, it may be proposed, in
line with models stressing the importance of the kinetics of Ag/TCR
interaction, that two types of signals be distinguished: a "fast"
short-lived signal is sufficient to activate NF-
B; whereas a
"slow" signal obtained after prolonged TCR engagement is required
for AP-1 activation. Failure to activate AP-1 in limiting conditions
(unstimulated mutant APC) was partially corrected by increasing
costimulation. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
phosphorylation
which was arrested at an intermediate stage (8) and a
subsequent abrogation of signal transduction including phosphorylation
of ZAP-70 (9, 10) and LAT (11). In addition
to these qualitative differences, quantitative parameters such as the
degree of TCR engagement must be considered. This notion came from
studies arguing that T cells counted the number of engaged TCRs and
responded when a certain threshold was reached (12). To
determine this activation threshold, not only the number of engaged
TCRs but also the duration of this engagement was shown to be important
(13). In this context, both coreceptors (CD4
(14) and CD8 (15, 16)) and costimulating
molecules (CD28 (12, 17)) participated in lowering TCR
requirements to sustain the activation threshold.
The outcome of APL recognition is the induction of a differential
functional T cell program that relies on a selective transcriptional
activation of a particular set of lymphokine (18)- or
cytotoxic mediator (19, 20)-encoding genes. These
observations raise the question of the nature of the differential
induction of transcription factor activities by partial agonists. One
of the genes that has been shown to be negatively regulated in
anergized T cell clones is the IL-2 gene (21). Its
transcription is controlled by a number of factors, including NF-
B
and AP-1 (22). AP-1 is composed mainly of members of the
Fos and Jun families of bZip proteins, but newly described bZip
proteins can associate with those AP-1 components (reviewed in Ref.
23), increasing the number of possible dimers capable of
interacting with AP-1 sites. The complexity of transcriptional
regulation mediated by AP-1 is further increased by the independent
modulation of DNA-binding and transcriptional activities. In in
vitro-derived unresponsive T cell clones, AP-1 activation has been
shown to be defective (24). However, the molecular
mechanism underlying unresponsiveness or partial reactivity of naive T
lymphocytes has not been addressed.
In the present study, we compared trans-activation in naive
CD8+ CTL precursors responding to either a full
or a partial agonist. We found that inefficient IL-2 synthesis in
response to a partial agonist correlated with an abortive AP-1
activation. Moreover, our work showed that a minimal TCR engagement,
not sufficient to induce detectable TCR down-modulation, may be capable
of stimulating cytotoxic effector differentiation, IFN-
production,
and NF-
B trans-activation, whereas this activation
threshold must be supplemented by costimulatory components to allow
IL-2 production, up-regulation of activation markers, and AP-1
trans-activation. Therefore, our study suggests for the
first time that a differential transcriptional control may account for
the distinct functional pattern induced in naive
CD8+ T cells by a full vs a partial agonist.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mice transgenic for the BM3.3 TCR (25) on the
CBA/Ca background (tgTCR), C57BL/6 (B6), and C57BL/6.C-H-2bm8 (bm8)
mice were bred in the Centre dImmunologie, Institut National de la
Santé et de la Recherche Médicale-Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique de Marseille-Luminy animal facility. Mice
transgenic for AP-1-luciferase (26) and NF-
B
-luciferase (R. J. Phillips, M. Rincon, R. A. Flavell, and S.
Ghosh, manuscript in preparation), backcrossed on the B10.BR strain,
were crossed with the tgTCR mice at the Centre dImmunologie,
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche
Médicale-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
(INSERM-CNRS) de Marseille-Luminy animal facility
(16).
Flow cytometric analyses
Reagents used for immunofluorescence staining were: biotin-mAb
Ti98, an anticlonotypic mAb specific for the BM3.3 TCR
(27) and FITC-anti-CD69 (H1.2F3 (28)),
both conjugated in the laboratory, FITC-anti-CD25 and
APC-anti-CD8
(PharMingen, Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).
After staining, 2 x 104 viable cells in
each sample were analyzed on a FACScan cytofluorometer (Becton
Dickinson).
Cell purification, culture conditions, and functional assays
CD8+ cells were purified from lymph nodes of tgTCR mice by negative selection using rat anti-CD4 mAb supernatant (H129.19.6 (29)) and a mix of both anti-mouse and anti-rat IgGs Dynabeads (Dynal, Oslo, Norway). In all experiments, CD8+ T cells represented 9098% of the enriched population. These CD8+ tgTCR+ cells were plated in microplates at 105 cells/well together with 2 x 105 irradiated stimulating cells, in triplicates. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was assessed after a pulse with 1 µCi/well. To determine lymphokine production, 100 µl of culture supernatant were harvested 48 h after stimulation and used to measure IL-2 secretion by evaluating its ability to sustain the proliferation of an IL-2 dependent T cell line (CTL.L) as described (30). To measure tgTCR, CD25, and CD69 cell surface modulation, 2 x 105 purified CD8+ cells were cultured in duplicates with 4 x 105 APCs for the indicated time. Immunofluorescence staining was then performed directly in the microplates. When indicated, in vitro cultures were conducted in the presence of one of the following rat mAb: a neutralizing anti-IL-2 (JES6, PharMingen, 4 µg/ml), anti-CD4 (H129.19.6 (29), 4 µg/ml), anti-ICAM-1 (BE29G1 (31), 10 µg/ml), anti-B7.2 (GL1 (32), 5 µg/ml), anti-B7.1 (1G10, PharMingen, 5 µg/ml) or of CTLA4-Ig (5 µg/ml) produced as described (33). Activated APCs were obtained by stimulating splenocytes for 24 h with 15 µg/ml LPS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
5(and 6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and propidium iodide stainings
Determination of number of T cell divisions was done by flow cytometry as described (34) using the cytoplasmic dye CFSE, that was shown to exhibit sequential halving of intracellular fluorescence intensity at each division step (34). Purified CD8+ tgTCR+ cells were incubated for 10 min at 37°C with 5 µM CFSE (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). After two washes, labeled cells were stimulated in duplicates for 48 h as described above. Cell cycle determination was done by flow cytometry after staining with propidium iodide. A 2 µg/ml solution of propidium iodide (Sigma) was used to resuspend ethanol-fixed cells.
Luciferase activity analysis
Lymph node cells were recovered from double tg (TCR
x AP-1/luciferase) or (TCR x NF-
B/luciferase) mice, and
106 cells were cultured with 2 x
106 stimulating cells as indicated or with PMA,
10 ng/ml, and ionomycin, 200 ng/ml, for the indicated time period in
duplicates. At each time, cells were harvested and lysed in lysis
buffer (luciferase assay, Promega, Madison, WI), and luciferase
activity was measured with the luciferase reagent (Promega) and a
luminometer (Lumat LB96P, Berthold, Nashua, NH).
Cell extract preparation and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
Cells (4 x 106) were cultured
with 8 x 106 stimulating cells in 6 ml
culture medium for different periods of time. To remove APCs, cell
suspensions were first incubated with
anti-I-Ak (when CBA APCs were used) or
anti-H-2Kb (when B6 or bm8 APCs were used)
mAb, in PBS supplemented with 1% FCS and 5 mM EDTA, and secondly with
anti-mouse IgG Dynabeads. Cell extracts were prepared as previously
reported (35) and 5-µg protein samples were incubated
with AP-1 or NF-
B binding site probes (see sequences in Ref.
36). Protein-DNA binding was analyzed by EMSA as described
(36). For supershift, Abs specific for Jun or Fos proteins
were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously shown that for CD8+ T
cells expressing an anti-H-2Kb tgTCR,
H-2Kbm8 behaves like a partial agonist, efficient
for the induction of cytolytic function and IFN-
production but
inefficient for the triggering of cell proliferation in vitro due to a
lack of IL-2 secretion (see Ref. 16 and Table I
). H-2Kbm8
presents four amino acid substitutions in the ß-pleated sheets of the
1 domain of H-2Kb, that essentially affect MHC
class I-peptide interactions (37). Whether these mutations
in the peptide groove of H-2Kbm8 may affect the
presentation of the same endogenous peptide which also binds to
H-2Kb (A. Guimezanes et al., manuscript in
preparation) or lead to presentation of a distinct endogenous peptide
that forms a complex with H-2Kbm8, for which the
tgTCR is cross-reactive, is currently being investigated.
|
|
|
|
Since H-2Kbm8 presented on unstimulated APCs
failed to induce tgTCR+ cell proliferation but
remained efficient for the induction of cytolytic function and IFN-
production (16), we wondered whether such partially
activated tgTCR+ cells would up-regulate markers
that are considered as a hallmark of activation such as CD69, CD44, and
CD25. As shown in Fig. 3
A,
stimulation by the full agonist induced a rapid up-regulation of CD69
on nearly 100% of tgTCR+ cells at 20 h. In
this case, the level of CD69 is further increased when
H-2Kb is presented on activated APCs (in Fig. 3
, means of fluorescent intensity are reported in parentheses). The
partial agonist did not induce either CD69 expression when unstimulated
APCs were used (as measured up to 20 h) or CD44 (data not shown).
However, when tgTCR+ T cells were stimulated for
a longer period of time (48 h),
30% of them had slightly
up-regulated CD69 (data not shown). When activated bm8 APCs were used,
the activation of tgTCR+ cells was more efficient
because 60% were CD69+ as early as 12 h
after the initiation of the stimulation. Nevertheless, this percentage
never exceeded 60% even when stimulation continued for longer
periods.
|
-chain of the IL-2 receptor (CD25), as it is
known to be regulated synergistically by TCR- and by IL-2-signaling
pathways (38). Whereas stimulation with the agonist (B6)
rapidly led to the up-regulation of CD25 on nearly all the
CD8+tgTCR+ cells, <30% of
them expressed CD25 on presentation of the partial agonist bm8 by
unstimulated APCs, and this level never exceeded 60% with activated
bm8 APCs (Fig. 3
In addition to an enhanced expression of costimulating and adhesion
molecules, LPS-activated APCs also expressed increased levels of MHC
class I molecules (Fig. 1
) which may consequently increase the number
of specific MHC/peptide complexes. Both parameters may play a role,
individually or synergistically, to partially compensate for the defect
in IL-2 induction and T cell activation by a partial agonist.
Inability of a partial agonist to induce tgTCR down-modulation
TCR down-modulation has been suggested to reflect the number of
engaged TCRs and therefore to be an appropriate way to measure signal 1
(39). We thus compared tgTCR surface expression after
triggering with full or partial agonists (see Fig. 4
). Because APCs used in this study
present the endogenously generated peptide, i.e., at low concentration,
late kinetics of TCR down-modulation were analyzed first. Data in Fig. 4
A show that a clear down-modulation of the TCR was observed
after 12 and 24 h in response to B6 whether APCs were activated or
not, but not in response to bm8. At shorter time points and when TCR
resynthesis was prevented by the protein synthesis inhibitor
cycloheximide, no TCR down-modulation was observed in response to bm8
APCs, whereas it was significant in response to B6 APCs (Fig. 4
B). Therefore, even in the presence of activated APCs which
up-regulated surface expression of MHC molecules, TCR engagement
mediated by the partial agonist H-2Kbm8 seemed to
be minimal. This result argues that the partial recovery of
tgTCR+ cell proliferation observed on stimulation
by activated bm8 APCs is more likely due to costimulation pathways that
may lower the number of engaged TCRs required to reach the activation
threshold rather than to an increase in the number of TCRs interacting
with the up-regulated MHC class I/peptide-specific partners. This is
also consistent with the inhibition of proliferation by agents blocking
costimulatory events (Table I
).
|
B and AP-1
trans-activation in response to partial agonist
The lack of IL-2 secretion after triggering by the partial agonist
H-2Kbm8, together with efficient IFN-
induction, suggested that specific regulation may occur at the
transcriptional level and prompted us to analyze the ability of such
altered ligand to activate transcriptional factors such as AP-1 and
NF-
B. To this end, we used mice transgenic for a luciferase reporter
under the control of two DNA binding sites for AP-1 or NF-
B, that we
crossed with the tgTCR mice. Peripheral CD8+ T
cells were purified from these double tg mice and stimulated in vitro.
Whereas the full agonist readily induced AP-1
trans-activation when unstimulated B6 splenocytes were used
as APCs, the bm8 counterparts were inefficient. When the agonist was
expressed at the surface of activated APCs, the kinetics of the
AP-1-mediated response was unchanged, but the level of
trans-activation was markedly enhanced. However, when the
response to the partial agonist was tested in the same conditions, we
observed an efficient but delayed AP-1 trans-activation
stimulated by activated APCs (Fig. 5
A). In contrast, NF-
B
-mediated transcription was activated by both full or partial agonists,
even presented by unstimulated APCs (Fig. 5
B). The prolonged
activation of NF-
B in response to the partial agonist is compatible
with a slight delay in the response to the partial agonist as compared
with the agonist (as observed at the 24-h point; results not shown).
trans-Activation by AP-1 and NF-
B can be influenced by
the state of phosphorylation of, respectively, c-Jun (23)
and p65 (40), which may not affect DNA binding of these
transcription factors. It was thus possible that transcription factor
DNA binding could occur in the absence of detectable
trans-activation. For this reason, we further analyzed the
level of AP-1- and NF-
B-DNA binding after T cell activation (Fig. 6
A). We visualized a reduced
AP-1 binding after bm8 as compared with B6 activation, whereas both
types of stimulation induced a comparable NF-
B-DNA binding. However,
an efficient but delayed AP-1-DNA binding could be observed when
bm8-stimulated APCs were used (Fig. 7
A),
these kinetics being compatible with the results reported above at the
transcriptional level. The nature of the AP-1 components induced by an
efficient antigenic stimulation (B6) was analyzed in supershift
experiments (Fig. 6
B) and revealed that all AP-1 binding
complexes contained a Fos family member as shown by the abrogation of
AP-1 binding on addition of a pan anti-Fos mAb. In contrast, only a
slight decrease and supershift of AP-1 binding was seen after
incubation with a pan anti-Jun mAb. This observation should be
qualified by the fact that the latter reagent has a weaker activity in
supershift experiments than the former (A. K. Simon and N.
A., unpublished data). Nevertheless, the use of specific
anti-c-Jun, -JunB, and -JunD mAb revealed that c-Jun and JunB were
less represented in AP-1 binding complexes than JunD. Therefore, the
lack of AP-1 binding after triggering by the partial agonist in
conditions of limiting costimulatory components may reflect a defect in
the induction of Fos and Jun members, as also reported for anergic
CD4+ T cells (41, 42). AP-1
complexes detected after 42 h in response to bm8 on activated APCs
also contained Fos and JunD (Fig. 7
B). Furthermore, it
appeared that a band that does not contain proteins of the Fos family
may be more represented in the extract from bm8-stimulated tgTCR T
cells. Whether this lower band corresponds to complexes containing only
Jun family members or additional components and whether it has any
functional relevance requires further investigation.
|
|
|
B in the absence
of AP-1 that is correlated with the DNA binding of these two
factors. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
secretion and cytolytic
function (16), but unable to drive entry into the cell
cycle and subsequent proliferation for BM3.3 tgTCR-naive
CD8+ T cells. When expressed by activated APCs
with increased B7.2 and ICAM-1 surface expression,
H-2Kbm8 seemed to behave as a moderate agonist
inducing a delayed entry into cell cycle and a partial recovery of
IL-2-dependent proliferation (Tables I and II; Fig. 2
The observed lack of TCR down-regulation after triggering by a partial
agonist agrees with some (46, 47, 48), but not all
(39) previous reports. However, the discrepancy with the
results reported by the latter group may be explained by the fact that
we analyzed the TCR behavior after encounter with an endogenously
expressed partial agonist without supplementation with high
concentration of exogenously added peptide. Moreover, whereas the
independence of cytotoxicity and IFN-
secretion from TCR modulation
has already been observed (36), here we report a situation
where proliferation can also occur independently of the down-regulation
of TCR surface expression. Thus, our results suggest that the number of
internalized TCRs does not correlate with the global efficiency of T
cell activation as previously proposed (12, 17) but rather
reflects the TCR-mediated signal 1, the outcome of T cell activation
being determined by the conjunction of both signal 1 and signal 2
(44).
In a particular T cell lineage, CD8lowtgTCRhigh that failed to produce IL-2 on Ag stimulation, we have previously observed that this impaired activity correlated with a lack of AP-1-mediated trans-activation (16). Here, this correlation between production of IL-2 and AP-1 trans-activation can be extended to naive CD8+ CTL precursors. The expression of costimulating molecules on APCs for the partial agonist H-2Kbm8 allowed partial recovery of TCR- induced IL-2 production which correlated with an efficient but delayed AP-1 trans-activation. Whether this time shift in AP-1 trans-activity was due to the induction of a different set of Fos and Jun members is presently being tested at the mRNA level. Furthermore, these results suggest that there was a convergence of signaling cascades initiated by the TCR and by costimulating molecules at the level of AP-1 activation. One of the possible points for the integration of these two types of signaling may be JNK, the protein kinase responsible both for posttranslational activation of AP-1 (26, 49, 50) and for stabilization of IL-2 mRNA (51). Additionally, a role of CD28 at enhancing protein tyrosine kinases activation through raft microdomain reorganization has recently been proposed, which led to increased downstream signaling including the ERK/MAPK and JNK pathways (52, 53).
Interestingly, the different requirements for NF-
B and AP-1
trans-activation as illustrated in this study after
triggering by a partial agonist may reflect distinct kinetics in the
signaling cascade initiated at the TCR level (54, 55, 56). The
former (NF-
B) may respond to a signal delivered very rapidly after
TCR engagement and therefore be less dependent on the duration of TCR
triggering, whereas the latter (AP-1) may require a longer engagement
to allow the generation of a slower signaling event. Thus, the short
interaction time between TCR and altered ligand due to a rapid
dissociation rate, may not be sufficient to induce AP-1 activity. This
assumption is consistent with the mechanisms that lead to activation of
NF-
B and AP-1, respectively. Indeed, NF-
B is constitutively
present in the cytoplasm and its activation, which is probably
dependent on a signaling cascade involving a mitogen-activated protein
3-kinase (57) and the
and ß forms of the I
B
kinases, leads to the phosphorylation and the subsequent
ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of its inhibitor I
B
(58). In contrast, AP-1 activity is achieved after
neosynthesis of Fos and Jun members and their further posttranslational
modifications (23). In addition, our results suggest that
in naive CD8 T cells, activation of NF-
B is less dependent on
costimulatory signals than that of AP-1.
Expression of both CD69 and CD44 Ags has been shown to be regulated by
AP-1 (59, 60). In the present study, we showed a parallel
between CD69 and CD44 expression, IL-2 production and AP-1
trans-activation, especially concerning the influence of
costimulatory components during the course of induction by a partial
agonist. Besides, minimal TCR engagement by a partial agonist seemed to
weakly induce CD25, the expression of which was more pronounced in the
presence of costimulation. However, this synergy between signals 1 and
2 seemed rather due to the secondary recovery of IL-2 secretion than to
a stronger TCR engagement, because the totality of the upgraded CD25
expression was abrogated in the presence of an anti-IL-2 mAb (Fig. 3
C). Furthermore, it should be noted 1) that both the level
of CD69 and CD25 induced by bm8 in conditions of costimulation never
reached the one observed with the full agonist, suggesting that a lower
activation threshold was reached by the partial agonist, and 2) that
only 60% of the tgTCR+ cells were responsive to
bm8, indicating that only a fraction of tgTCR+ T
cells responded to partial agonist encounter. Together these
observations may explain the fact that stimulation with activated bm8
APCs leads to only partial recovery of IL-2 production, but it also
raises the question of why a "monoclonal"
tgTCR+ CD8+ population
shows an heterogeneous response to a specific stimulus. One possibility
would be that the expression of specific
H-2Kbm8/peptide complexes is so weak that not all
tgTCR+ cells/APC encounters lead to productive
engagement of TCRs. This observation is reminiscent of a previous
example of heterogeneity in cytokine responses of monoclonal
CD4+ T cells (61).
We have shown that a minimal TCR engagement (signal 1) by a partial
agonist which did not induce down-regulation of cell surface expressed
TCRs (this study), still triggered sufficient signaling to complete
differentiation from naive to effector T cells and IFN-
production
(16). However, both IL-2 synthesis and up-regulation of
activation markers failed to be stimulated in such conditions, and we
propose that this is due to an inefficient activation of the AP-1
transcription factor. When expression of costimulating molecules was
increased on APCs (signal 2), the partial agonist induced limited IL-2
secretion and up-regulation of activation markers as well as a recovery
of AP-1 trans-activation. Altogether, these observations
allowed the establishment of a hierarchy between T cell functions in
terms of their sensitivity to endogenously expressed APL. It also
showed that costimulation may be particularly important in the course
of an immune response toward weakly stimulatory ligands. Moreover,
these data showed that both TCR- and costimulatory molecule-mediated
signals converge toward the AP-1 transcription factor. The particular
situation of AP-1 at the crossroads of both signal 1 and signal 2 may
explain why it appeared to be the target for inactivation in anergic T
cells (21) and designated it as a key modulator of T cell
responses that one can try to specifically target by either
immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive designed strategies. In such
approaches, it will be important to keep in mind the dissociation of
signals leading to NF-
B and AP-1 trans-activation as well
as their differential sensitivity to T cell activation thresholds.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Nathalie Auphan, Centre dImmunologie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique de Marseille-Luminy, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Case 906, 13288 Marseille, Cedex 9, France. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: APL, altered peptide ligands; CFSE, 5(and -6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay. ![]()
Received for publication May 3, 1999. Accepted for publication August 27, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ß T cell receptor structure at 2.5A and its orientation in the TCR-MHC complex. Science 274:209.
phosphorylation. Science 281:572.
and lack of Zap70 recruitment in APL-induced T cell anergy. Cell 79:913.[Medline]
phosphorylation without Zap-70 activation induced by TCR antagonists or partial agonist. Science 267:515.
in surface expression of the T cell antigen receptor/CD3 complex and in activation for killing analyzed with CD3
negative cytolytic T lymphocyte variant. J. Immunol. 148:657.[Abstract]
B activity through induction of I
B synthesis. Science 270:286.
B acting through the NF-
B-inducing kinase and I
B kinases. Immunity 10:271.[Medline]
B puzzle?. Curr. Biol. 8:R19.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Verdeil, D. Puthier, C. Nguyen, A.-M. Schmitt-Verhulst, and N. Auphan-Anezin STAT5-mediated signals sustain a TCR-initiated gene expression program toward differentiation of CD8 T cell effectors. J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 4834 - 4842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Yui, L. L. Sharp, W. L. Havran, and E. V. Rothenberg Preferential Activation of an IL-2 Regulatory Sequence Transgene in TCR{gamma}{delta} and NKT Cells: Subset-Specific Differences in IL-2 Regulation J. Immunol., April 15, 2004; 172(8): 4691 - 4699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Auphan-Anezin, G. Verdeil, and A.-M. Schmitt-Verhulst Distinct Thresholds for CD8 T Cell Activation Lead to Functional Heterogeneity: CD8 T Cell Priming Can Occur Independently of Cell Division J. Immunol., March 1, 2003; 170(5): 2442 - 2448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Han and N. Sidell RU486-Induced Growth Inhibition of Human Endometrial Cells Involves the Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Signaling Pathway J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 713 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. VERDEIL, D. PUTHIER, C. NGUYEN, A.-M. SCHMITT-VERHULST, and N. AUPHAN-ANEZIN Gene Profiling Approach to Establish the Molecular Bases for Partial versus Full Activation of Naive CD8 T Lymphocytes Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2002; 975(1): 68 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Auphan-Anezin and A.-M. Schmitt-Verhulst Differential Survival of Transferred CD8 T Cells and Host Reconstitution Depending on TCR Avidity for Host-Expressed Alloantigen J. Immunol., June 15, 2001; 166(12): 7200 - 7207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Guerder, M. Rincon, and A.-M. Schmitt-Verhulst Regulation of Activator Protein-1 and NF-{{kappa}}B in CD8+ T Cells Exposed To Peripheral Self-Antigens J. Immunol., April 1, 2001; 166(7): 4399 - 4407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||