|
|
||||||||
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27858
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. However, during a 4-h culture with T-APC or macrophage APC,
recognition of MBP or mitogenic activation of responder T cells
elicited high levels of I-A and I-E expression on responders.
Acquisition of class II MHC glycoproteins by responders was resistant
to the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, coincided with
transfer of a PKH26 lipophilic dye from APC to responders, and resulted
in the expression of syngeneic and allogeneic MHC glycoproteins on
responders. Unlike rested I-A- T cell clones, rat thymic
and splenic T cells expressed readily detectable levels of class II MHC
glycoproteins. When preactivated with mitogens, naive T cells acquired
APC-derived MHC class II molecules and other membrane-associated
proteins when cultured with xenogeneic APC in the absence of Ag. In
conclusion, this study provides evidence that APC donate membrane-bound
peptide/MHC complexes to Ag-specific T cell responders by a mechanism
associated with the induction of tolerance. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have indicated that T cell-mediated Ag presentation constitutes a central pathway of cell-cell communication among rat MBP-reactive T cells (8, 9, 10, 11, 12). When cultured with professional APC in the presence of MBP, MBP-specific T cells express class II MHC glycoproteins and subsequently present Ag to separate populations of responder T cells. The expression of I-A glycoproteins by T cells appears to involve at least two distinct mechanisms. First, blastogenic T cells directly synthesize class II MHC glycoproteins and assemble MHC/peptide complexes for presentation to responder T cells (10, 11, 12). Second, T cells appear to directly acquire preformed class II MHC/peptide complexes from professional APC (11, 12, 13, 14). The latter mechanism may involve APC-mediated release of small vesicles bearing class II MHC glycoproteins and subsequent Ag-specific uptake of such vesicles by responder T cells. Direct support for the latter mechanism stems from the observation that transformed T-APC constitutively release small I-A+ vesicles (12). T-APC pulsed with MBP release vesicles that not only activate MBP-specific responders, but also endow those responders with surface class II MHC glycoproteins and with the ability to present MBP to separate populations of MBP-specific responders. Thus, MHC/peptide complexes may be actively exchanged by a mechanism of intercellular vesicular transport among APC and Ag-specific T cells.
T cell-mediated Ag presentation may be central to mechanisms of peripheral tolerance (15). Positive thymic selection produces a mature T cell repertoire that recognizes specific self MHC/peptide complexes as inefficient ligands (i.e., partial agonists). Mature immunocompetent T cells most likely continue to recognize specific self MHC ligands in the periphery as inefficient ligands. Two experimental observations have linked inefficient TCR recognition with prolonged T-APC activity. First, T cell acquisition of class II MHC glycoproteins is driven by partial agonists that lack activity in assays of IL-2 production, proliferation, or induction of B7.1 molecules (9, 16). Second, the duration of class II MHC expression on T cells depends upon subsequent interactions with TCR on the same or neighboring clones (10). T cells that efficiently recognize cell surface class II MHC glycoproteins quickly down-regulate these molecules, whereas inefficient TCR recognition results in prolonged expression and presentation of these complexes. This relationship may explain why enduring T-APC activity is often mediated upon recognition of antagonistic MHC ligands or upon Ag recognition in the presence of tolerogenic anti-CD4 and anti-LFA-1 mAb (8, 9, 10, 11, 16, 17). Thus, the positively selected T cell repertoire may inefficiently recognize and subsequently present self MHC/peptide complexes in a B7-deficient manner to any clone that recognizes the same self peptide/MHC complex as an efficient ligand.
The purpose of this study was to identify mechanisms by which T cells acquire class II MHC glycoproteins. Herein, we show that an early activation event following specific MHC/peptide-TCR interactions results in the cell-to-cell transfer of preformed class II MHC ligands from APC to responder T cells. T-APC that actively donate MBP/class II MHC complexes to responder T cells are also able to adoptively transfer resistance to EAE in recipient rats. The transfer of preformed MHC/peptide complexes among Ag-specific T cells may have important implications for the fate of Ag in an adaptive immune response and for maintenance of self-tolerance.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lewis rats (RT-1l), Brown Norway rats (BN, RT-1n), PVG rats (RT-1c), and BALB/c mice (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were bred and maintained at East Carolina University School of Medicine (Greenville, NC). MBP was purified from rat or guinea pig spinal cords (Rockland, Gilbertsville, PA). Anti-I-A OX6 and OX3 IgG1 (specific for monomorphic determinant and Lewis polymorphic I-A determinants, respectively), anti-I-E OX17 IgG1 (18, 19), anti-TCRß-chain R73 IgG1 (20, 21), anti-CD4 W3/25 IgG1 (22), anti-CD4 OX35 IgG2a (23), anti-IL-2R OX39 IgG1 (24), anti-OX40 IgG2b (24, 25), and anti-transferrin receptor OX26 IgG2a (26) were concentrated by ultrafiltration of supernatants through Amicon spiral-wound membranes (100-kDa exclusion). Anti-I-A HIS28 IgG2a, anti-B7.1 3H5 IgG1, and anti-B7.2 24F IgG1 mAb (27) were purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Cycloheximide, Con A, ionomycin, and PMA were obtained from Sigma. The anti-BN antiserum was derived by repeated immunization of Lewis rats with BN splenocytes.
Cell lines
R1-trans, 2F4-trans, 5F3-trans,
and PVG-GP-trans T cells are IL-2-dependent, transformed
variants of the GP2.E5/R1, R2.2F4, GP2.5F3, and PVG-GP clones,
respectively. These T-APC clones constitutively express high levels of
class II MHC glycoproteins, B7.1, and B7.2 (11). The
mildly encephalitogenic GP2.E5/R1 and GP2.5F3 T cell clones were
isolated from Lewis rats sensitized with GPMBP in CFA. The highly
encephalitogenic R2 line and the R2.2F4 and R2.2C8 clones were isolated
from Lewis rats sensitized with synthetic peptide R7286
(PQKSQRSQDENPV) in CFA (8, 28). The CONAL.8D9 clone was
isolated from Lewis rats sensitized with conalbumin in CFA
(9, 10, 11). BN-GP and PVG-GP T cells lines were isolated from
BN and PVG rats immunized with GPMBP in CFA. R1-trans,
2F4-trans, 5F3-trans, and PVG-GP-trans
T cells were used as T-APC in this study, whereas R2.2C8,
R2.2F4, BN-GP, and PVG-GP lines were used as responders. T cell clones
were maintained in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated
FBS (Summit, Boulder, CO), 2 mM glutamine, 100 µg/ml streptomycin,
100 U/ml penicillin (Whittaker Bioproducts, Walkersville, MD), 50 µM
2-ME (Sigma), and rat rIL-2. Culture supernatants (0.4%) from Sf9
insect cells infected with a rat rIL-2 baculovirus were used as a
source of IL-2. The rat alveolar M
NR8383 cell line
(29) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection
(Manassas, VA). Splenocytes (SPL) as well as thymocytes were used as
naive responders and were washed three times in HBSS before use. In
assays to measure transfer of class II MHC glycoproteins, T-APC and
responders were typically cultured at cell densities of 2.5 x
105/ml each in IL-2-supplemented RPMI. SPL were
exposed to 3000 rad of
-irradiation and were then used as a source
of professional APC. Irradiated SPL (irrSPL) and T cell responders were
cultured at cell densities of 1.25 x 106/ml
and 5 x 105/ml, respectively, unless
designated otherwise.
Adoptive transfer of T cells and measurement of EAE
2F4-trans and 5F3-trans T cells were propagated in serum-free AIM medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with rat IL-2 and 50 µM 2-ME. These T cells (2 x 106/ml) were cultured with the combination of 2 µM GPMBP and 2 µM RMBP or with no Ag for 4 h and were injected into naive recipient rats. After 1 wk, recipient and untreated control rats were challenged with an emulsion of 25 µg of GPMBP and 200 µg of heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv in CFA. Each rat received two 50-µl injections on each side of the base of the tail. Recipients were scored daily for signs of clinical EAE according to the following scale: paralysis in the distal tail = 0.25, limp tail = 0.5, ataxia = 1, hindleg paresis = 2, full hindleg paresis = 3. The cumulative score was the sum of daily clinical scores for each rat. The mean cumulative severity was the average cumulative score for all rats within a group. The mean maximal intensity was the average maximal score among afflicted rats within a group.
Measurement of Ag-stimulated proliferation
The BN-GP T cell line (2.5 x
104/well) was cultured with designated densities
of IFN-
-induced NR8383 M
in complete RPMI medium in the presence
or absence of 2 µM GPMBP. After 24 h of a 48-h culture, the
cultures were pulsed with 1 µCi of
[3H]thymidine (6.7 Ci/mmol; NEN, Boston, MA). T
cells were harvested onto filters to measure
[3H]thymidine incorporation by scintillation
counting.
Flow-cytometric analysis
Cells were stained with PKH26 or PKH67 dyes (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), according to manufacturers instructions. Washing and incubation of T cells with Ab reagents were performed at 4°C. mAb were added at 2.5 µg/ml or a 1/20 titration of a concentrated supernatant. T cells were incubated for 40 min, washed twice, and incubated for 40 min with a FITC- or PE-conjugated secondary reagent. Dead cells were excluded from analysis by forward vs side scatter profiles. Data were acquired with a Becton Dickinson FACScan (San Jose, CA) flow cytometer and were analyzed with Lysis II and CellQuest software programs.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MBP-pulsed T-APC mediate tolerogenic activity in vivo
Of these transformed clones, the Vß4+2F4-trans and Vß8.2+ 5F3-trans
clones grew well in serum-free medium. These clones were pulsed with a
combination of GPMBP and RMBP and were transferred into recipients.
After 1 wk, rats were challenged with GPMBP in CFA. As shown in Fig. 1
, adoptive transfer of these clones
resulted in a significant reduction in the severity of EAE. These
clones exhibited tolerogenic activity in vivo despite expression of
high levels of both B7.1 and B7.2 costimulatory molecules (bottom
panels). Only MBP-pulsed T-APC suppressed the subsequent induction
of EAE, whereas unpulsed T-APC were without activity. Thus, expression
of MBP-derived peptide/I-A complexes on the surface of the T-APC was
required for adoptive transfer of tolerogenic activity. The strong
tolerogenic activity of the Vß4+2F4-trans clone and the requirement for class II-restricted
presentation of MBP discount a possible role for anti-Vß8.2
immunity. Overall, these data indicate that expression of self
peptide/class II MHC complexes on the cell surface is required for
expression of regulatory activity by these clones in vivo.
|
T-APC lines such as 2F4-trans, 5F3-trans,
and R1-trans constitutively process soluble protein Ags such
as MBP or conalbumin and incorporate derivative peptides into class II
MHC glycoproteins for presentation to appropriate responder T cells.
R1-trans T cells were the focus of subsequent
experiments because these T cells expressed the highest levels of I-A.
In these experiments, R1-trans T-APC presented MBP to
encephalitogenic R2.2C8 responder T cells that were prelabeled with the
PKH26 lipophilic dye (Sigma). PKH26 (FL2 fluorescence) is a nonleaching
dye that incorporates into the lipid bilayer and enables long-term
tracking of specific cell populations (40, 41). The
R1-trans T-APC were larger (Fig. 2
A) and were
PKH26- (lower quadrants of
Fig. 2
B), and were thus readily distinguished from smaller
PKH26+ responders (R1 gate in Fig. 2
A
and upper quadrants in Fig. 2
B).
|
Expression of class II MHC glycoproteins on responder T cell reflects a mechanism of acquisition from APC
The relatively rapid appearance of I-A on responders provided
suggestive evidence that initial appearance of I-A on responders may
reflect shedding of I-A from T-APC, followed by Ag-specific capture by
responder T cells. To test this possibility, Ag-dependent interactions
of unlabeled R1-trans T-APC with PKH67 (FL1)-labeled R2.2F4
responder T cells were analyzed in the presence or absence of the
protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (Fig. 3
). In the presence of T-APC, GPMBP
stimulated expression of I-A on responder T cells (gated by the
combination of R1 and R3 regions) by a mechanism that was largely
resistant to cycloheximide. In contrast, GPMBP-dependent induction of
IL-2R, OX40 receptors, or transferrin receptors (measured by OX39,
OX40, and OX26 mAb) was abrogated by cycloheximide (data not shown).
Overall, these results implicate R1-trans T-APC as the
source of I-A glycoproteins that accumulate on responder T cells.
|
|
|
The data described above strongly indicate that Th cells such as transformed T-APC constitutively synthesize class II MHC molecules, whereas responder T cells appear to directly acquire intact MHC class II molecules from APC. To further resolve mechanisms of synthesis vs acquisition in responder T cells, we tested whether Ag-specific interactions of T cell responders and APC resulted in intercellular transfer of allogeneic MHC class II glycoproteins from APC to responder T cells. For this purpose, GPMBP-specific T cell lines were derived from BN or PVG rat strains (BN-GP and PVG-GP lines, respectively) to serve as responder T cells. BN-GP T cells and PVG-GP T cells were restricted by RT-1n and RT-1c class II MHC molecules, respectively (data not shown). Detection of allogeneic MHC class II glycoproteins depended on the use of the OX6 and OX3 mAb. The OX6 mAb recognizes a common monomorphic I-A determinant, whereas the OX3 mAb recognizes a polymorphic determinant uniquely expressed on Lewis, but not on BN or PVG APC. The OX6 mAb inhibited MBP-specific responses by Lewis and PVG T cell lines, but not by BN-GP T cells (data not shown). The OX3 mAb inhibited MBP-specific responses by Lewis T cell lines, but not by either PVG or BN T cell lines (data not shown). Thus, Lewis and PVG-GP T cells were restricted by different polymorphic class II I-A glycoproteins, whereas BN-GP T cells required a different class II MHC glycoprotein for Ag recognition.
To address whether class II MHC glycoproteins are acquired or
synthesized by responders, BN-GP T cells were labeled with PKH67 and
were cultured with irradiated BN, F1(BN x
Lewis), or Lewis SPL for 2 days in the presence or absence of GPMBP or
Con A. As shown in Fig. 6
, BN-GP T cells
expressed high levels of I-A when activated by Ag or mitogen in the
presence of syngeneic APC, as revealed by high levels of staining with
OX6, but not OX3 (left panels). In contrast, BN-GP T
cells activated in the presence of F1 APC
(middle panels) or fully allogeneic Lewis APC (right
panels) expressed high levels of surface I-A, as revealed by
staining with both OX6 and OX3 mAb. Thus, mitogenic or antigenic
activation of BN-GP T cells resulted in the intercellular transfer of
allogeneic Lewis I-A molecules from professional APC to responder BN-GP
T cells. PVG-GP T cells that were stimulated with GPMBP or Con A in the
presence of F1(PVG x Lewis) SPL or Lewis
SPL also efficiently acquired Lewis allogeneic MHC glycoproteins (data
not shown). These data indicate that acquisition of APC-derived class
II MHC glycoproteins rather than endogenous synthesis represents a
major pathway for generation of class II MHC molecules on responder T
cells. Furthermore, the mitogen Con A was as effective as GPMBP in
catalyzing the transfer of allogeneic MHC complexes from APC to
responder T cells. Thus, cellular activation rather than TCR ligation
per se was required for efficient acquisition of MHC class II
glycoproteins.
|
IFN-
causes induction of I-A on rat M
, but not on rested or
activated T cell responders
Although acquisition of I-A from APC may represent a major source
of I-A on responder T cells, direct biosynthesis of I-A may also
contribute to the accumulation of I-A on responder T cells. To assess
the possible role of activation-dependent synthesis of class II MHC,
responder T cells were activated in the absence of APC. Responder T
cells were cultured for 1 to 3 days with mitogenic mAb (data not shown)
or with PMA and ionomycin (Fig. 7
).
Despite extensive blastogenesis, as shown by forward scatter profiles
(top two panels, Fig. 7
A), responder R2 T
cells did not exhibit I-A expression even when cultured in the presence
of IFN-
(bottom four histograms). Several additional
activated and rested responder T cells including BN-GP T cells (Fig. 7
B) were cultured with IFN-
, but none of these T cells
exhibited surface I-A. Also, IFN-
did not elevate expression of I-A
on 5F3-trans T cells (Fig. 7
B) or several other
transformed T-APC lines (data not shown), even though this cytokine
elicited expression of I-A on the NR8383 line of rat alveolar M
.
These data suggest that synthesis of I-A glycoproteins by Th cells is
governed by a unique regulatory strategy.
|
-APC or T-APC
The studies described above showed that Ag presentation by either
T-APC or irrSPL caused the accumulation of I-A on responder T cells.
Interpretation of these data was complicated due to extensive cell
death of T-APC and the heterogeneity of splenic APC. To address these
issues, we used the NR8383 rat M
cell line to determine whether
nonapoptotic M
-APC donate I-A molecules to responder T cells during
Ag-induced activation. The NR8383 M
line was derived from an outbred
Sprague Dawley rat (29) and did not express class II MHC
glycoproteins. However, when induced with IFN-
, NR8383 M
expressed I-A glycoproteins that were detected equally by the OX6 and
OX3 mAb (Fig. 8
). The OX3 mAb also
labeled I-A on the Lewis-derived R1-trans T cells, but did
not bind I-A molecules that were present on the PVG-GP-trans
clone. We screened IFN-
-induced NR8383 M
for APC activity on
several responder T cell lines and found that these M
presented MBP
to BN-GP T cells (Fig. 8
). These M
also presented conalbumin to a
conalbumin-specific BN T cell line, but did not present Ag to
MBP-specific or conalbumin-specific PVG or Lewis T cell lines (data not
shown). Despite histocompatibility with BN Ag presentation activity,
IFN-
-induced NR8383 M
did not react with a Lewis anti-BN
alloantiserum (data not shown). Hence, these M
express class II MHC
glycoproteins homologous to that of BN rats, despite substantial
differences in MHC allotypes.
|
-induced NR8383 M
,
peritoneal Lewis rat M
, or R1-trans T cells. Within
4 h of culture (Fig. 9
, Lewis M
, or R1-trans T-APC. In these
cultures, mitogen-activated T cells did not impair the viability of
either M
or T-APC (data not shown). Rested BN-GP T cells also
acquired allogeneic I-A from M
, but only when cultured with an
appropriate stimulus such as MBP or Con A (Fig. 9
|
-APC. The role of TCR is
required for induction of an activated phenotype, but thereafter is
dispensable for the process of I-A acquisition. Intercellular transfer
of I-A from APC to T cell responders is not dependent upon apoptosis of
APC. Intercellular transfer of MHC class II glycoproteins may lead to
relatively high accumulations of I-A on the surface of responder T
cells. Thymic and splenic rat T cells express class II MHC glycoproteins and actively acquire allogeneic MHC glycoproteins from APC
The studies described above were performed with lines of Th cells
that were continuously propagated in IL-2. A question central to the
relevance of these observations is whether continuously propagated
lines of Th cells reflect normal physiological function of Th cells in
general. To test this question, we isolated thymocytes and splenocytes
and performed two-color flow-cytometric analyses to assess whether
TCRhigh lymphocytes expressed surface I-A
glycoproteins (Fig. 10
). Substantial
proportions of both TCRhigh splenocytes and
thymocytes (28% and 43% of cells in upper two quadrants of
each dot plot, respectively) expressed surface I-A. Thus, normal rat T
cells express I-A glycoproteins at levels similar to that observed for
Th cell lines cultured with APC and Ag (e.g., Fig. 9
). In contrast,
rested R2 T cells did not express surface I-A (Fig. 10
). These
experiments also showed that class II MHC expression on T cells in vivo
was remarkably consistent regardless of age, gender, or strain (Lewis,
PVG, or BN) (data not shown). I-A on splenic and thymic T cells was
also detected with either the HIS28 mAb (Fig. 10
) or the OX6 mAb (data
not shown). These data support the concept that class II MHC expression
on T cells may be important in T cell physiology.
|
|
The protein-protein or protein-lipid interactions that mediate
intercellular exchange of MHC class II glycoproteins may be either
species specific or may possibly be highly conserved among species. As
shown in Fig. 12
, R1-trans
T-APC also efficiently donated MHC class II glycoproteins to
preactivated BALB/c thymocytes. Hence, neither allogeneic nor
xenogeneic barriers prevented exchange of I-A glycoproteins. Consistent
with our previous findings, the transfer of rat I-A molecules across
the xenogeneic barrier was strongly enhanced by mitogenic preactivation
of BALB/c thymocytes. Even among BALB/c thymocytes not exposed to
mitogen, a proportion of BALB/c thymocytes nonetheless exhibited
blastogenesis when cultured with R1-trans T-APC during the
1-day culture. In these cultures, the magnitude of forward scatter was
a direct correlate of I-A acquisition (data not shown). Overall, these
data indicate that highly conserved mechanisms mediate the
activation-dependent exchange of cell surface proteins among T
cells.
|
The mechanism of intercellular exchange of cell surface proteins most
likely requires cytoskeletal reorganization and membrane mobility for
generation of vesicles or membrane evaginations. To test this
generalized prediction, we treated either T-APC or preactivated
responders with fixative before culture. As shown in Fig. 12
, fixation
of either T-APC or responders completely abrogated exchange of MHC
class II glycoproteins. Thus, the physiological integrity of both APC
and responders is required for exchange of cell surface proteins.
In conclusion, these studies provide evidence that T cell Ag recognition coupled with T cell activation are events causally linked with T cell acquisition of APC-derived class II/peptide complexes. Given that TCR is the major physiological avenue of T cell activation in vivo, cognate MHC/peptide presented by APC are mobilized and actively exchanged among activated, Ag-specific networks of T cells. These data therefore introduce an important new paradigm for communication of Ag-specific information during the course of an immune response.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have also indicated that APC shed MHC class II glycoproteins that are acquired by T cells (13, 14). APC-derived vesicles represent a possible vehicle for intercellular transfer of class II MHC glycoproteins and other APC-derived molecules from APC to T cells. For example, APC may produce class II MHC-bearing vesicles (i.e., exosomes) derived from the MHC class II endocytic compartment (66, 67). Exosomes form upon invagination of the limiting MHC class II endocytic compartment vesicular membrane and result in a multivesicular compartment comprised of smaller vesicles within a larger vesicle. Upon fusion with the surface membrane, exosomes may be released into the extracellular space and may be captured via fusion with T cells bearing appropriate clonotypic TCR. Alternatively, the APC surface membrane may vesiculate in the contact zone between opposing APC-T cell conjugates. Class II MHC-bearing vesicles may thereby be released within the zone between APC and responders to augment specific acquisition by cognate responders.
The mechanism for I-A acquisition appears to involve a TCR-dependent phase and a subsequent TCR-independent phase. First, antigenic ligation of the TCR induces T cell activation to enable the T cell to become a competent recipient of APC-derived vesicles. These activation pathways do not require protein synthesis, and therefore may be mediated by conformational activation or mobilization of preexisting adhesion molecules. Mitogens such as PMA and ionomycin that bypass TCR also enabled T cell-mediated acquisition of allogeneic and xenogeneic I-A from APC. Thus, TCR ligation was required for T cell activation, but thereafter was not required for the subsequent physical acquisition of APC-derived I-A molecules. These observations indicate that other specialized proteins may exist to mediate docking and fusion of APC-derived vesicles.
The mechanism by which APC elaborate I-A-bearing vesicles may also be
an activation-dependent process. R1-trans T-APC are
transformed activated blast cells that constitutively produced
I-A+ vesicles (12). However, normal
APC may require feedback activation from specific responder T cells to
induce production and directional release of vesicles. When isolated
from MBP-pulsed R1-trans T-APC, these vesicles stimulated
proliferation of responder T cells, conferred cycloheximide-resistant
acquisition of I-A by responders, and enabled responders to present MBP
to other MBP-specific responder T cells. The correlation between death
of R1-trans T-APC and intercellular transfer of I-A to
responder T cells provided suggestive evidence that apoptotic bodies
may also serve as a vehicle for the transfer of I-A from APC to
responder T cells. For example, apoptosis of APC results in the release
of Ag-bearing apoptotic bodies that are taken up by dendritic cells for
representation of Ag (68). Although apoptosis may possibly
mediate one mechanism for the transfer of intact MHC/peptide complexes
to responder T cells, a requirement of APC apoptosis is unlikely
because I-A acquisition by T cell responders preceded detection of
apoptosis of T-APC. Also, T-APC did not exhibit cell death during
interactions with mitogenically preactivated responders, and M
APC
did not die during antigenic stimulation of responders. Future studies
are needed to resolve whether apoptosis constitutes a source of I-A for
intercellular transfer of class II MHC glycoproteins.
Several studies have indicated that TCR ligation plays a central role in the generation of T-APC phenotype (8, 9, 10, 11). Acquisition of intact class II MHC complexes from APC and biosynthesis of class II MHC complexes by T cells represent two Ag-dependent mechanisms that both couple TCR recognition with T cell expression of class II MHC glycoproteins loaded with both specific and bystander peptides. Both pathways enable Th cells, like B cells, to use cognate receptor specificity to guide the specificity of Ag presentation. B cells use surface Ab to capture and internalize specific Ag into the endocytic Ag-processing pathway. The consequence is that surface Ab receptors constrain the pool of Ags available for subsequent B cell-mediated Ag presentation so that B cells preferentially present Ags that are covalently linked to the cognate Ag (69, 70, 71). By this mechanism, B cell APC typically present covalently linked determinants to T cells to promote cooperation between B cells and T cells that share specificity for the same Ag. The coupling of B cell Ab specificity with the specificity of Ag presentation is of fundamental importance to the physiology of humoral immune responses. The data presented herein indicate that T cells like B cells comprise a cognate system of APC. The finding that TCR regulates acquisition of class II MHC glycoproteins indicates that T-APC and T cell responders share specificity for specific or bystander Ags derived from the same APC.
The finding that class II MHC glycoproteins mediate intercellular
transport of peptide Ag may reflect an unrealized but important
function of these molecules. Packaging of antigenic peptides in
complexes with MHC glycoproteins followed by intercellular transfer may
represent a means by which Ag may flow through a population of lymphoid
cells. Ag may be processed and assembled into class II MHC
glycoproteins by professional APC such as M
, dendritic cells, and B
cells, and then may be acquired by Th cells. Th cells that acquire
MHC/peptide complexes may in turn present these complexes to other
responder T cells. By such a mechanism, Ag may become concentrated on T
cells having highest reactivity to that Ag. Such a mechanism would
greatly enable interactions of MHC/peptide complexes with specific T
cells where such interactions may facilitate immunity or tolerance
depending upon the regulated expression of costimulatory molecules on T
cells.
The finding that M
APC and T-APC provide MHC class II glycoproteins
for ultimate expression on specific responder T cells may be important
for understanding mechanisms of self-tolerance. Previously, we showed
that the activated Vß4+ R2.2F4 clone caused an
episode of EAE that was followed by the development of resistance to
EAE (28). Although 2F4-trans T cells are a
derivative of the R2.2F4 clone, 2F4-trans T cells exhibited
no detectable pathogenic activity. Nonetheless, when pulsed with MBP
and transferred into naive recipients, these T cells were able to
effectively engender resistance to the subsequent induction of EAE.
Hence, the tolerogenic activity of R2.2F4 does not strictly depend upon
the previous expression of EAE, but rather represents an activity that
can be mediated independently of pathogenicity. The data shown in Fig. 1
implicate a mechanism of T cell-mediated Ag presentation in
development of resistance to EAE because MBP-pulsed T-APC expressed
tolerogenic activity, whereas unpulsed T-APC exhibited no activity.
Overall, this study shows that in vivo expression of tolerogenic
activity is correlated with the intercellular transfer of
MBP-peptide-derived I-A complexes. Possibly, the ability of MBP-pulsed
T-APC to specifically donate MBP-peptide/I-A complexes to endogenous
MBP-specific responders may be important for disabling encephalitogenic
precursors in vivo.
Positive thymic selection generates a mature T cell repertoire that
inefficiently recognizes specific self MHC ligands. T cell recognition
of self may result in the transfer of MHC class II glycoproteins from
APC to specific responders by mechanisms described in this study. This
possibility is supported by the observation that both splenic and
thymic rat T cells express surface I-A glycoproteins (Fig. 10
).
Inefficient recognition of self MHC ligands appears sufficient to
enable acquisition of MHC class II glycoproteins by mature T cells, but
would be coupled with a lack of overt T cell activation and deficient
expression of costimulatory molecules (16). Thus,
inefficient recognition of self by the positively selected T cell
repertoire would result in T cell-mediated presentation of those self
MHC/peptide complexes to any autoreactive responder with pathogenic
self-reactivity (15). The ability of T-APC to generate
anergy and apoptosis in responder T cells and mediate adoptive transfer
of suppressive activity supports a potential role for T-APC activity in
self-tolerance.
In conclusion, this study may have relevance for understanding the function of MHC class II glycoproteins. MHC class II/peptide complexes can no longer be conceptualized as static fixtures on APC. Rather, these molecules are mobilized from cell to cell during immune responses as part of an undefined regulatory program.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Mark D. Mannie, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody Medical Sciences Building, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27858-4354. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; BN, Brown Norway; GP, guinea pig; irrSPL, irradiated SPL; M
, macrophage; MBP, myelin basic protein; R, rat; SPL, splenocyte. ![]()
Received for publication May 21, 1999. Accepted for publication August 25, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|