|
|
||||||||
Research Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4ß7 integrin) and peripheral
homing receptors (L-selectin). Parenteral IPV vaccination was able to
boost systemic and mucosal IgA responses in previously OPV-vaccinated
persons only. None of the previously vaccinated IPV recipients
responded with the production of IgA in saliva. In agreement with this
finding, a large percentage of the poliovirus-specific IgA-producing
lymphocytes detected in previous OPV recipients expressed the
4ß7
integrin. It is concluded that IPV vaccination alone is insufficient to
induce a mucosal IgA response against poliovirus. In mucosally (OPV-)
primed individuals, however, booster vaccination with IPV leads to a
strong mucosal IgA response. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whether wild-type poliovirus can remain circulating in vaccinated populations (silent circulation) is an important question for the eradication program. In theory, silent circulation is possible in IPV-vaccinated populations because i.m. vaccination with IPV probably induces little or no secretory IgA (S-IgA) at mucosal sites. Several studies, however, indicate that some degree of mucosal immunity can be measured in IPV vaccinees, albeit less than in people who have been vaccinated with the OPV or infected with wild-type virus (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Most information comes from studies that were conducted at times when poliovirus was still endemic, or in regions where OPV was also used. Therefore, the results of these studies are likely to be confounded by additional priming of the mucosal immune system by infection with live poliovirus (vaccine or wild-type). Some of the more recent studies have also included IPV-vaccinated subjects recruited from endemic regions (7, 10). Therefore, it is still unclear whether the IPV vaccination alone is able to induce mucosal immunity and is responsible for the induction of S-IgA in saliva or stool samples.
We have previously shown that IPV vaccination can induce strong memory IgA responses in the serum of persons who have previously been naturally exposed to live (wild-type) poliovirus (11). An age-dependent increase in the presence of IgA in the circulation of the IPV-vaccinated population in The Netherlands, one that cannot be explained by IPV vaccination alone, has also been described (11). Based on these results, we have postulated that a memory IgA response after IPV vaccination is dependent on previous mucosal infection with live poliovirus (vaccine or wild-type).
To test this hypothesis, both IPV and OPV recipients were given a booster vaccination with one dose of IPV. The group of OPV recipients served as a model for previous mucosal priming with live poliovirus. Induction of poliovirus-specific IgA was measured in the plasma, saliva, and stool samples of the volunteers. Poliovirus-specific IgG and IgA Ab-producing cells isolated from the circulation were enumerated by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays. The homing potentials of the poliovirus-specific IgG- and IgA-producing lymphocytes found in the circulation were also examined to determine their final destination.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fourteen IPV-vaccinated volunteers from The Netherlands (average age 25.8, range 2041 yrs) and 11 OPV-vaccinated volunteers (average age 32.5, range 2544 yrs) from different countries where OPV is used in national programs were enrolled in the study. Most OPV recipients were from countries where circulation of wild-type poliovirus has been absent or at low levels for some time, including Canada, Germany, Belgium, Italy, New Zealand, Austria, Spain, and Curaçao. One OPV recipient was from Morocco, where wild-type poliovirus has been detected as recent as 1995.
All volunteers were injected i.m. with a standard dose of the IPV (diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis vaccines) (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands) containing 40, 4, and 7.5 D-antigen units for serotypes 1, 2, and 3, respectively. This vaccine is also used in the regular immunization program in The Netherlands, where a total of six IPV vaccinations are given at 3, 4, 5, and 12 mo, and at 4 and 9 yr of age. Blood specimens were collected before booster vaccination and at 3, 7, and 28 days postvaccination and were immediately processed. Saliva samples were collected in plastic vails containing a protease inhibitor mixture (Boehringer-Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) at each of the first 10 days after vaccination and every week thereafter until 8 wk postimmunization. Three stool specimens (wk 0, 1, and 2) were collected in special containers and examined for poliovirus-specific Abs. Stool and saliva samples were stored at -20°C until use.
The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Netherlands Central Organization for Applied Scientific Research (Zeist, The Netherlands). An informed consent form was signed by all volunteers at the start of the study.
Isolation of lymphocytes
Blood samples were collected in containers using EDTA as an anticoagulant. The blood samples were layered on an equal volume of ficoll (Histopaque; Sigma, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). After centrifugation (30 min, 400 x g) the lymphocyte-rich interphase was removed by pipette. The plasma was collected and stored at -20°C until testing in the ELISA assays was done. Cells were washed twice in RPMI 1640/10% FCS (10 min, 250 x g), counted, and adjusted to the required concentration.
Separation of homing receptor-positive and -negative cell populations
The separation of the lymphocytes into homing receptor-positive
and -negative populations has been described by Kantele et al. (12).
Cells were separated on the basis of the expression of the integrin
4ß7, which mediates trafficking to the intestine and intestinal
lymphoid tissues, and L-selectin (Chemicon, Temecula, CA), which
mediates trafficking mainly to the peripheral lymph nodes (13, 14, 15).
Cells (107 cells/ml) were incubated with 1 µg/ml mAb to
L-selectin, or with 2 µg/ml mAb to
4ß7 (Act-1; kindly provided
by Leukosite, Ambridge, MA, and Dr. Lazarovitz (London
Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada) for 30 min at 4°C
under rotation in a volume of 1 ml medium. Cells were washed three
times and incubated with 2 x 107 magnetic beads
coated with sheep anti-mouse IgG (Dynal M-450, Oslo, Norway). The
beads with the attached cells were separated from the receptor-negative
population through the application of a magnet. The beads were washed
once and the separation was repeated. The receptor-positive cells
attached to the beads were suspended in medium. Both positively and
negatively selected cell populations were used in ELISPOT assays.
FACS analysis
The composition of the negatively selected cell populations was
examined after cell separation by FACS analysis. Cells were incubated
for 30 min on ice with primary Ab to L-selectin or
4ß7 integrin
(Act-1). After incubation, the cells were washed three times with 1%
BSA in PBS and incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse
conjugate (Cappel, Aurora, OH) for 30 min on ice. Cells
were washed and analyzed using FACScan (Becton Dickinson, San Jose,
CA). The average purity of the negatively selected cell population
after separation was 95% and 97% for L-selectin and
4ß7,
respectively.
ELISPOT assay
Microtiter plates were coated with an optimal dilution in carbonate buffer of bovine anti-poliovirus serotype 1, 2, or 3 (RIVM), and were incubated overnight at 4°C. The wells were then saturated with 10% FCS in RPMI 1640 for 1 h at 37°C. Ag was added in a concentration of 40120 DU/ml IPV and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Plates were washed four times with PBS supplemented with 0.5% Tween 20. Serial dilutions (2-fold) of the PBMC in a volume of 100 µl starting at 106 cells/ml were incubated for 4 h, allowing the lymphocytes to secrete Abs. Plates were washed, and the Abs bound to the viral Ag on the plate were detected by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated IgG or IgA class-specific Igs (Sigma). Plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C. After washing the plates, substrate (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate) in a concentration of 0.65 mg/ml was diluted in 2-amino-2 methyl-1-propanol substrate buffer with agarose of 40°C, then added to the wells and allowed to harden. Ab-producing cells were visible as blue spots and were enumerated under a microscope allowing the total number of Ab-producing cells per 106 cells to be calculated. Cells were cultured in the absence of the poliovirus Ag as a control.
Poliovirus-specific total IgA, IgA1, and IgA2 ELISA (plasma, saliva, and stool)
The IgA ELISA was performed as described (11). Presence of poliovirus serotype-specific IgA was determined in plasma, saliva, and stool samples. Plasma samples were inactivated (30 min at 56°C) before use in the IgA-ELISA and depleted of IgG Abs with Quik-Sep (Isolab, Mechelen, Belgium), according to the manufacturers instructions, to prevent possible interisotype competition. Saliva samples were centrifuged (10 min, 3500 rpm) and inactivated for 30 min at 56°C. A 10% w/v suspension of the stool samples was added to the IgA ELISA at a 1:2 dilution. ELISA assays were performed with IgA1- and IgA2-specific conjugates (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Uithoorn, The Netherlands) to determine the subclasses of poliovirus-specific IgA. The results obtained with the saliva IgA assay are expressed as a positive:negative ratio to correct for high background levels that were observed in some recipients. Optimal dilutions of reagents were determined by checkerboard titration. Positive and negative control serum samples were included in all IgA assays.
Poliovirus-specific secretory Ab capture ELISA
A capture ELISA was used as described to determine whether IgA detected in plasma samples after IPV vaccination was also present in its secretory form (11). Briefly, microtiter plates were coated with a mAb against the secretory component (Sigma) by overnight incubation at 4°C in carbonate buffer. Plates were blocked with 5% Blotto (Pierce, Oud Beijerland, The Netherlands). Plasma dilutions (1:50) were added, and the plates were incubated for 1.5 h at 37°C. IPV was added, and bound Ag was detected with horseradish peroxidase-labeled serotype-specific mAb (1 h, 37°C). Tetramethylbenzidine was used as a substrate (0.1 mg/ml) in 0.11 M sodiumacetate buffer, and the reaction was stopped after 30 min with 2 M H2SO4.
Poliovirus-specific subclass and total IgG ELISA (saliva and plasma)
Saliva and serum samples were tested for the presence of poliovirus serotype-specific IgG Abs. Assays were performed as described for the IgA ELISA but with anti-human IgG-alkaline phosphatase-labeled conjugate or with biotin-labeled Abs to the different subclasses of IgG (IgG1, -2, -3, and -4; Sigma). Optimal dilutions of reagents were obtained by checkerboard titration. Avidin conjugated with alkaline phosphatase was added to the plates that were then incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The plates were washed, and 100 µl of p-nitrophenylphosphate at a concentration of 1 mg/ml in 0.1 M glycine buffer was added to each well. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, the plates were read at 405 nm.
Poliovirus-binding inhibition test (PoBI)
The PoBI was performed as described to determine the poliovirus serotype-specific Ab titer in the plasma samples (16). The reciprocal of the first serum dilution that was positive in the inhibition test was taken as the titer of the test sample.
Poliovirus-specific IgM capture ELISA
The IgM-ELISA was performed as described (17). A positive and a negative control serum were examined in each assay
Statistical methods
Students t tests were performed to determine the significance of the difference between IPV and OPV recipients. The p values of <0.01 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The number of poliovirus-specific IgG- and IgA-producing cells in
the circulation was determined for all three serotypes of poliovirus at
days 0, 3, 7, and 28 (Fig. 1
). Both IPV-
and OPV-vaccinated subjects responded with IgG-producing cells that
were detectable only at day 7 after booster vaccination with IPV (Fig. 1
, A and B). High numbers of IgA-producing cells
were detected in OPV-vaccinated persons 7 days after vaccination (Fig. 1
D). In contrast, none of the IPV recipients had
IgA-producing cells to serotypes 1 and 2, and only one IPV-vaccinated
subject responded with 230 serotype 3-specific IgA-producing
cells/106 cells at day 7 (Fig. 1
C). No
poliovirus-specific IgG- and IgA-producing cells were detected at 0, 3,
and 28 days after booster vaccination in either group. On average, the
levels of Ag-specific IgA-secreting cells were higher than for IgG
secreting cells, but this was not observed in all OPV recipients.
|
4ß7 positive and negative cell populations were
tested in serotype 3-specific ELISPOT assays (Fig. 2
4ß7 integrin on
their surface (Fig. 2
4ß7 integrin-expressing and -nonexpressing cells,
respectively. Poliovirus-specific IgA-producing cells were detected in
both the L-selectin positive and negative populations in the
OPV-vaccinated group (Fig. 2
4ß7
integrin between the IPV and OPV recipients (72.3% vs 72.6%, data not
shown). However, 80.9% of the poliovirus-specific IgG-producing cells
expressed L-selectin in the IPV-vaccinated group, while only 46.5%
were found positive with L-selectin in the OPV recipients (data not
shown).
|
A significant difference (p <
0.01) was seen in the poliovirus-specific salivary IgA response
for the three serotypes between OPV and IPV recipients after the IPV
booster vaccination (Fig. 3
). Nine of
eleven OPV recipients developed a salivary IgA response to all three
serotypes of poliovirus after the IPV booster vaccination. The
poliovirus-specific IgA appeared in the saliva within 56 days after
the booster vaccination. None of the IPV-vaccinated volunteers
(n = 14) responded with poliovirus-specific IgA in the
saliva (Fig. 3
).
|
Poliovirus-specific IgA to all three serotypes was detected in the stool samples of three out of nine of the OPV-vaccinated subjects. A mucosal IgA response was not detected in any of the IPV-vaccinated subjects stool samples. This difference was not significant (data not shown).
Poliovirus-specific IgA in plasma
Two subjects in the OPV group had detectable IgA to all three
serotypes in their circulation before the IPV booster vaccination was
given (Fig. 4
B), and one
subject in the IPV group had detectable poliovirus-specific IgA to
serotypes 2 and 3 at day 0. There was a clear increase in levels of
circulating plasma IgA to all three serotypes in the OPV-vaccinated
group at day 7 after the IPV booster vaccination, and the response
remained elevated up to day 28 (Fig. 4
). IgA responses to all three
serotypes of poliovirus were also detected in the IPV-vaccinated group,
but the levels were significantly lower than those observed in the OPV
recipients (p < 0.01).
|
Poliovirus-specific Abs were clearly present in both IgA1 and IgA2
subclasses in the OPV recipients (Fig. 4
, D and
F). IgA responses in the IPV recipients were seen at very
low levels and appeared to be mainly of the IgA1 subclass. No
poliovirus-specific IgA2 was detected in the majority of IPV
recipients.
Poliovirus-specific secretory Abs in plasma
The IPV and OPV recipients also differed in the induction of
poliovirus-specific Abs bound to the secretory component in their
circulation (Fig. 5
). Poliovirus-specific
secretory Abs appeared in 7 of 10 OPV recipients for all three
serotypes. Such responses where absent in the IPV recipients for
serotype 1, and only 2 of 11 IPV recipients had detectable
poliovirus-specific secretory Abs for serotype 2 and 3 (Fig. 5
A). In all cases, the secretory Ab responses were at low
levels and of short duration, with an apparent peak at day 7.
|
In general, the total IgG response in the plasma samples was not
significantly different in both groups and consisted mainly of the IgG1
subclass (Fig. 6
). However, the IgG3
subclass response was more prominent in the IPV group compared with the
OPV recipients, and the difference was significant
(p < 0.05) for serotype 1 and 3 at day 7 and
day 28 after vaccination (Fig. 6
, E and F). A low
level IgG2 response was induced in several individuals by the IPV
booster vaccination in both groups (data not shown). No clear response
was seen for IgG4 for all serotypes in both IPV and OPV recipients
(data not shown). No poliovirus-specific IgG was seen in the saliva
after IPV booster vaccination in most of the IPV and OPV recipient
groups. However, two IPV recipients and one subject in the OPV
group responded with an IgG response in the saliva to all three
serotypes (data not shown).
|
At the start of the study, the median levels of PoBI titers were generally higher in the IPV-vaccinated group than in the OPV recipients. This difference was significant for serotype 3 (p < 0.01). However, the OPV recipients responded with a similar increase in PoBI titer after IPV vaccination and reached the same levels at day 28 (data not shown).
Polio-specific IgM in plasma
Low positive IgM responses only were detected in recipients in both study groups at 7 and 28 days after booster vaccination. In the IPV-vaccinated group, 3, 2, and 4 of 11 had an IgM response to serotype 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In the OPV recipients, 3, 5, and 5 persons of 10 had an IgM response for serotype 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No significant differences were detected in IgM responses between the OPV recipients and IPV recipients (data not shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The poliovirus-specific IgG levels detected in the saliva of IPV recipients were low or absent, suggesting that salivary IgG does not play a role in protection from mucosal infection with poliovirus. We cannot exclude isotype competition in our saliva assay between IgG- and IgA-poliovirus-specific Abs. However, in the IPV recipients with no detectable poliovirus-specific IgA in their saliva, this isotype competition is very unlikely. IgG is thought to enter the mucosal secretions nonspecifically through paracellular transport. It still remains to be investigated whether or not circulating IgG is able to exert an influence on protection to a mucosal poliovirus challenge. It has been postulated that a critical level of specific serum IgG may be sufficient to protect against infectious diseases by inactivating the inoculum of the pathogen (18).
Assuming that the absence of mucosal IgA reflects a lack of mucosal protection, our observation may have implications for the poliomyelitis eradication program in The Netherlands. In the absence of an efficient mucosal barrier, IPV recipients will remain sensitive to poliovirus infection. These infections will go unnoticed because fully vaccinated persons will not develop any symptoms of disease. Under these circumstances, IPV recipients will contribute to the (continuous) circulation of poliovirus. This poses a special risk to the religious communities with low vaccine coverage that presently exist in The Netherlands. Epidemics of poliomyelitis occurred within these groups in 1978 and 1992, despite the high national vaccine coverage (19, 20, 21, 22). During the advancing stages of poliomyelitis eradication, accompanied by a decrease in the incidence of the mucosal infection of IPV recipients by live poliovirus, this effect is likely to be even more pronounced, resulting in the waning of presently existing mucosal immunity in the general population.
Parenteral IPV vaccination induced a strong and rapid IgA response in previously OPV-vaccinated persons both at mucosal sites and in the circulation. However, the presence or absence of Abs in stool extracts might not be truly representative due to prompt digestion of intestinal immunoglobulins by the enzymes present in the stool samples (23). Similar memory IgA responses in the circulation after IPV vaccination were detected in a group of nonvaccinated but naturally exposed persons (11). Induction of memory S-IgA responses by parenterally administered inactivated vaccines has also been described for influenza virus (24, 25), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and meningococci (26, 27). In these cases, natural infection with the agents is very common, and the authors postulated that the memory IgA response most likely resulted from previous mucosal infection with the wild-type virus or bacteria, based on the dogma that mucosal Ag presentation is required for an effective mucosal immune response.
The mechanism by which inactivated parenteral vaccination can
restimulate the mucosal IgA responses is unknown. The memory
IgA-producing cells detected in our experiments most likely have
originally been primed at mucosal sites. IPV is applied i.m.,
therefore, the peripheral lymph nodes are theoretically the first
lymphoid location for Ag presentation to memory cells (28). Expression
of L-selectin (indicating homing to peripheral lymph nodes) on
poliovirus-specific IgG- and IgA-producing cells was demonstrated in
this study. The memory lymphocytes will proliferate after restimulation
and leave the peripheral lymph nodes. A large proportion (73%) of the
circulating poliovirus-specific IgA-producing cells expressed the
4ß7 mucosal homing receptor, indicating a preference for homing to
the mucosal surfaces. This was underscored by the induction of
poliovirus-specific IgA in saliva. At least a proportion of the
poliovirus-specific IgA-producing cells in this experiment expressed
both the
4ß7 integrin and L-selectin on their surface. It is known
that some homing receptors are expressed continuously, while others are
induced by local activating signals acting on both circulating and
local cells (15). The final combination of homing receptors on the
cells surface is likely to account for the regional preference of the
activated cells. The presence of memory cells that express both the
L-selectin and
4ß7 homing receptors are an ideal immune
surveillance mechanism to control infections both at the systemic and
mucosal level.
The poliovirus-specific subclass response of IgA and IgG was determined to investigate whether there was a qualitative and quantitative difference in the humoral immune response after IPV booster vaccination in previously IPV- and OPV-vaccinated persons. Poliovirus-specific IgA2 in the circulation was clearly present in the OPV recipients, and might be derived from lymphocytes that were originally primed at mucosal sites. Presence of poliovirus-specific IgA2 in the plasma might serve as a systemic marker for mucosal memory rather than the presence of total poliovirus-specific IgA, since an IgA1 response, albeit small, was also seen in some of the IPV recipients.
We detected an IgG1 and IgG3 subclass response before and after IPV
booster vaccination in both the OPV and IPV recipients (Fig. 6
).
Similar results were reported in poliomyelitis patients and for other
enteroviral Ags (29, 30). However, in this study, the IgG3 response in
the OPV recipients was significantly lower than in IPV recipients.
These results might indicate a difference in preference for an IgG1
switch over an IgG3 switch after mucosal priming with OPV compared with
systemic vaccination with IPV. No clear IgG4 response was observed, and
only a few individuals responded with IgG2 poliovirus-specific Abs.
Mechanisms for the observed differences remain to be investigated.
Not much is known about the induction and presence of circulating S-IgA. Immunoassays indicate that S-IgA can be detected at relatively low levels (+/-10 µg/ml) in serum (31, 32). In the present study, we detected poliovirus-specific S-IgA after booster vaccination with IPV in previously OPV-vaccinated recipients. The response was at low levels and decreased rapidly. The biological relevance of this finding is speculative and remains to be investigated. We speculate that it represents an overload of the secretory system.
Very little is known about the effects of a combination schedule of IPV and OPV vaccination on systemic and mucosal immunity. A combination of both vaccines is able to overcome some of the disadvantages that can occur when each vaccine is used separately (such as vaccine-associated cases) and is able, at the same time, to achieve both the high serum Ab levels provided by enhanced IPV and the intestinal protection provided by enhanced OPV. Recent studies in the United States have employed a combination of eIPV and OPV that effectively induced high neutralization titers, as well as mucosal immunity (33).
Vaccination with OPV is a source of live virus introduction into the environment, and must, therefore, cease completely in the future. This work has demonstrated that after initial vaccination with OPV, IPV booster vaccinations are able to maintain the mucosal IgA response at high levels for years thereafter. These findings indicate that a combination schedule of OPV and IPV vaccination could serve as a powerful tool in the final stages of the eradication program.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M. Herremans, Research Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: IPV, inactivated poliovirus vaccine; OPV, oral poliovirus vaccine; S-IgA, secretory IgA; ELISPOT, enzyme-linked immunospot; PoBI, poliovirus-binding inhibition test. ![]()
Received for publication November 23, 1998. Accepted for publication January 26, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4ß7. Scand. J. Immunol. 42:662.[Medline]
4ß7 and LFA-1 in lymphocytes homing to Peyers patch-HEV in situ: the multistep model confirmed and refined. Immunity 3:99.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. M. Belyakov and J. D. Ahlers What Role Does the Route of Immunization Play in the Generation of Protective Immunity against Mucosal Pathogens? J. Immunol., December 1, 2009; 183(11): 6883 - 6892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Forrest, M. W. Pride, A. J. Dunning, M. R. Z. Capeding, T. Chotpitayasunondh, J. S. Tam, R. Rappaport, J. H. Eldridge, and W. C. Gruber Correlation of Cellular Immune Responses with Protection against Culture-Confirmed Influenza Virus in Young Children Clin. Vaccine Immunol., July 1, 2008; 15(7): 1042 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. N. McNeilly, S. W. Naylor, A. Mahajan, M. C. Mitchell, S. McAteer, D. Deane, D. G. E. Smith, J. C. Low, D. L. Gally, and J. F. Huntley Escherichia coli O157:H7 Colonization in Cattle following Systemic and Mucosal Immunization with Purified H7 Flagellin Infect. Immun., June 1, 2008; 76(6): 2594 - 2602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Taylor, M. E. Ziman, J. Fong, J. V. Solnick, and M. Vajdy Possible Correlates of Long-Term Protection against Helicobacter pylori following Systemic or Combinations of Mucosal and Systemic Immunizations Infect. Immun., July 1, 2007; 75(7): 3462 - 3469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. M. Leung, W. W. C. van Maren, F. K. L. Chan, W. S. Chan, A. W. I. Lo, C. H. Ma, F. C. H. Tam, K. F. To, P. K. S. Chan, J. J. Y. Sung, et al. Extremely Low Exposure of a Community to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus: False Seropositivity due to Use of Bacterially Derived Antigens. J. Virol., September 1, 2006; 80(18): 8920 - 8928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Peng, L. R. Wang, V. R. Gomez-Roman, A. Davis-Warren, D. C. Montefiori, V. S. Kalyanaraman, D. Venzon, J. Zhao, E. Kan, T. J. Rowell, et al. Replicating Rather than Nonreplicating Adenovirus-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Recombinant Vaccines Are Better at Eliciting Potent Cellular Immunity and Priming High-Titer Antibodies J. Virol., August 15, 2005; 79(16): 10200 - 10209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Moe, A. Sair, L. Lindesmith, M. K. Estes, and L.-A. Jaykus Diagnosis of Norwalk Virus Infection by Indirect Enzyme Immunoassay Detection of Salivary Antibodies to Recombinant Norwalk Virus Antigen Clin. Vaccine Immunol., November 1, 2004; 11(6): 1028 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Arnold, D. Bumann, M. Felies, B. Gewecke, M. Sorensen, J. E. Gessner, J. Freihorst, B. U. von Specht, and U. Baumann Enhanced Immunogenicity in the Murine Airway Mucosa with an Attenuated Salmonella Live Vaccine Expressing OprF-OprI from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infect. Immun., November 1, 2004; 72(11): 6546 - 6553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. McKenzie, A. J. Corbett, S. Johnson, J. L. Brady, J. Pleasance, D. R. Kramer, J. S. Boyle, D. C. Jackson, R. A. Strugnell, and A. M. Lew Bypassing luminal barriers, delivery to a gut addressin by parenteral targeting elicits local IgA responses Int. Immunol., November 1, 2004; 16(11): 1613 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Krieg, R. Maier, and A. Meyerhans Gut-homing ({alpha}4{beta}7+) Th1 memory responses after inactivated poliovirus immunization in poliovirus orally pre-immunized donors J. Gen. Virol., June 1, 2004; 85(6): 1571 - 1579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Youngman, M. A. Franco23, N. A. Kuklin, L. S. Rott, E. C. Butcher, and H. B. Greenberg Correlation of Tissue Distribution, Developmental Phenotype, and Intestinal Homing Receptor Expression of Antigen-Specific B Cells During the Murine Anti-Rotavirus Immune Response J. Immunol., March 1, 2002; 168(5): 2173 - 2181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Shata and D. M. Hone Vaccination with a Shigella DNA Vaccine Vector Induces Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Cells and Antiviral Protective Immunity J. Virol., October 15, 2001; 75(20): 9665 - 9670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Herremans, J. H. J. Reimerink, T. G. Kimman, H. G. A. M. van der Avoort, and M. P. G. Koopmans Antibody Responses to Antigenic Sites 1 and 3 of Serotype 3 Poliovirus after Vaccination with Oral Live Attenuated or Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine and after Natural Exposure Clin. Vaccine Immunol., January 1, 2000; 7(1): 40 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |