The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kwon, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kwon, B. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 162: 4938-4942.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

Differential Effects of Leukotactin-1 and Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1{alpha} on Neutrophils Mediated by CCR11

Shangming Zhang2,*, Byung-S. Youn2,*, Ji-Liang Gao{dagger}, Philip M. Murphy{dagger} and Byoung S. Kwon3,*,{ddagger}

* Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, and the Walther Cancer Institute, Indianapolis, IN 46202, {dagger} Laboratory of Host Defenses, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; and {ddagger} Department of Biological Sciences and the Immunomodulation Research Center, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The human CC chemokine leukotactin-1 (Lkn-1) is both a strong chemoattractant for neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes and a potent agonist for CCR1 and CCR3. However, human neutrophils do not migrate when the cells are stimulated with other human CC chemokines, such as human macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha} (hMIP-1{alpha}) and eotaxin, which also use the CCR1 and CCR3 as their receptors. In this report, we demonstrate that while hMIP-1{alpha} induced a negligible level of calcium flux and chemotaxis, Lkn-1 produced a high level of calcium flux and chemotaxis in human neutrophils. Lkn-1 cross-desensitized hMIP-1{alpha}-induced calcium flux, but hMIP-1{alpha} had little effect on the Lkn-1-induced response in human neutrophils. The same pattern was observed in peritoneal neutrophils from wild-type mice, whereas neutrophils from CCR1-/- mice failed to respond to either MIP-1{alpha} or Lkn-1. Scatchard analysis revealed a single class of receptor for both hMIP-1{alpha} and Lkn-1 on human neutrophils with dissociation constants (Kd) of 3.2 nM and 1.1 nM, respectively. We conclude that CCR1 is a receptor mediating responses to both MIP-1{alpha} and Lkn-1 on neutrophils and produces different biological responses depending on the ligand bound.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemokines are a family of small cytokines that are basic, heparin-binding proteins. Classification of chemokines is based on the distance between the first two of four to six conserved cysteine residues. Four subfamilies of chemokines have been discovered to date: CXC({alpha}), CC(ß), C({gamma}), and CX3C (1, 2, 3). CXC chemokines act primarily on neutrophils, but show some activity on T lymphocytes (4, 5, 6, 7). CC chemokines function on monocytes, basophils, eosinophils, T lymphocytes, NK cells, and dendritic cells but usually do not affect neutrophils (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). The only known C chemokine is active on T lymphocytes and NK cells (11, 12). Soluble CX3C chemokine stimulates chemotaxis of T cells and monocytes. The membrane-bound form of CX3C, which is induced on activated primary endothelial cells, promotes strong adhesion of those leukocytes (3).

Leukotactin-1 (Lkn-1),4 a recently described CC chemokine, contains two extra cysteines. Lkn-1 binds to both CCR1 and CCR3 and induces chemotaxis and calcium flux in human neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes (13) as well as eosinophils (S.M.Z. and B.S.K., unpublished observations). Purified rLkn-1 exhibited a site-specific cleavage and was 24 amino acids shorter than intact Lkn-1, which consists of 92 amino acids. Chemotaxis of neutrophils distinguishes Lkn-1 from other CCR1 agonists such as human macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha} (hMIP-1{alpha}). MIP-5/HCC2, a synthetic chemokine, has the same amino acid sequence as cleaved Lkn-1. MIP-5/HCC2, a truncated form of Lkn-1, was reported to be an agonist for CCR1 and CCR3 and to stimulate the chemotaxis of monocytes, lymphocytes, and eosinophils but not neutrophils (14). In the present study, we examined the mechanism of neutrophil migration by Lkn-1.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Production and purification of rLkn-1

His-tagged rLkn-1 containing an additional six His at the C terminus was purified from Escherichia coli using an activated nickel column (Novagen, Madison, WI) followed by a heparin agarose column (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) as previously described (13, 15). The purified rLkn-1 migrated as a single band of ~12 kDa on SDS-PAGE. This form of rLkn-1 is called an intact form of rLkn-1 (rLkn-1i) (Fig. 1Go). rLkn-1 was also produced in the High Five insect cell line (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) grown in EX-cell 400 medium (JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, KS). rLkn-1 was purified from culture media by heparin and HiTrap-SP columns (Pharmacia) (13). Fractions that showed a single band of ~9 kDa on SDS-PAGE were pooled. The N-terminal sequencing of purified rLkn-1 revealed that it was 24 amino acids shorter than intact rLkn-1, which was named cleaved rLkn-1 (rLkn-1c). Purified rLkn-1i and rLkn-1c were dialysed against PBS (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) then analyzed by immunoblotting with rabbit polyclonal anti-Lkn-1 (13). Endotoxins in the rLkn-1 preparation were removed by Affi-prep polymyxin matrix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Purification of two forms of rLkn-1. His-tagged rLkn-1 produced in E. coli was purified with an activated nickel column and a heparin agarose column followed by Hi-Trap-SP column. rLkn-1 purified from insect cell cultures showed a site-specific cleavage to produce a ~9 kDa protein (Lkn-1c, lane 1). His-tagged rLkn-1 migrated as a single band of ~12 kDa (rLkn-1i, lane 2). M (in kDa) indicates the protein size marker.

 
CCR1-deficient mice

Generation of CCR1-/- mice was previously described (16).

Cell preparation

Human PBMC and neutrophils were isolated from healthy donors as previously reported (13, 15). The purity of neutrophils was >95% as determined by microscopic examination after Diff-Quick (Baxter Scientific, McGaw Park, IL) staining. The few contaminating cells were mononuclear cells and eosinophils. To obtain enriched mouse neutrophils, the mouse peritoneal cavity was washed with PBS 3 h after peritoneal injection of thioglycollate. The purity of neutrophils was >90% as assessed by light microscopic examination of Diff-Quick-stained cytospin preparations (16).

In vitro migration analysis

Migration of cells was assessed in a 48-well microchamber (Neuroprobe, Cabin John, MD) as previously described (13). Briefly, the lower wells were filled with 27 µl buffer alone or with buffer containing rLkn-1, IL-8, or hMIP-1{alpha}, and the upper wells were filled with 50 µl of neutrophils in 1x HBSS (Life Technologies) at 1 x 106 cells/ml. The two compartments were separated by a polyvinylpyrrolidone-free filter (Nucleopore; Neuroprobe) with 3-µm pores. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, the filters were removed from the chamber, washed, fixed, and stained with Diff-Quick. The cells of five randomly selected oil-immersion fields were counted. The chemotactic index (CI) was calculated from the number of cells that migrated to the test chemokines divided by the number of cells that migrated to the control. Significant chemotaxis was defined as CI > 2.

To confirm that all the chemotactic activity for neutrophils was due specifically to rLkn-1, we blocked the activity in vitro with affinity-purified anti-Lkn-1 polyclonal Abs. rLkn-1 (1000 ng/ml) or IL-8 (500 ng/ml) was preincubated with 10 µg/ml affinity-purified rabbit anti-Lkn-1 Abs or purified Ig fraction of rabbit preimmune serum as a control for 30 min at 37°C, then used in the chemotaxis assay described above.

rLkn-1-induced migration may be separated into chemotactic and chemokinetic components. The chemotactic component was determined by the addition of rLkn-1 (1000 ng/ml) to the lower wells only, and the chemokinetic component was determined by the addition of rLkn-1 (1000 ng/ml) to both the upper and lower wells.

Calcium flux assay

The calcium mobilization assay was performed as previously described (13, 15).

Receptor binding studies

Purified rLkn-1 and hMIP-1{alpha} (carrier-free, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) were labeled with 125I using Iodo-beads iodination reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The specific activities of the labeled rLkn-1 and hMIP-1{alpha} were ~2 x 107 cpm/µg protein. Human neutrophils, prepared as described above, were suspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS at a concentration of 2 x 107 cells/ml; 100 µl of the suspension was added to each tube. The cells were incubated in the presence of various concentrations of labeled rLkn-1 or hMIP-1{alpha} with 100-fold excess of the corresponding unlabeled ligand or with medium (200 µl of total reaction volume) at 4°C for 1 h with continuous rotation. Incubation was terminated by centrifuging the cell suspension over 1 ml of 10% sucrose (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) cushion. Cell pellets were cut from the tubes, and cpm were counted.

In vivo activity

To test the in vivo chemotactic effects of rLkn-1, rLkn-1i was injected into the peritoneum of C3H mice at 0.5 µg in 0.5 ml PBS per mouse. Human serum albumin (HSA; Sigma), or PBS, was applied to Affi-prep polymyxin matrix columns to remove endotoxin, and then injected i.p. as a control (six mice/group). Two hours after injection, peritoneal exudate was collected and the total number of cells counted by hemocytometer. Leukocytes in three randomly selected oil-immersion fields were counted differentially after Diff-Quick staining.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
rLkn-1, but not hMIP-1{alpha} or eotaxin, is a potent neutrophil chemoattractant

We examined chemotaxis stimulated by the two forms of rLkn-1, i.e., the intact form (rLkn-1i) and the cleaved form (rLkn-1c), and compared the chemotaxis with hMIP-1{alpha}, eotaxin, and IL-8. Both forms of rLkn-1 were chemotactic for neutrophils at concentrations from 100 to 1000 ng/ml. Maximum migration was reached with 1000 ng/ml Lkn-1i (CI, 7.87 ± 0.18) or Lkn-1c (CI, 6.8 ± 0.12) and 100 ng/ml IL-8 (CI, 8.43 ± 0.39) (Fig. 2GoA). hMIP-1{alpha} failed to induce significant chemotaxis of neutrophils (maximal CI of 1.97 ± 0.20 at 1000 ng/ml, Fig. 2GoA). Eotaxin was not able to induce chemotaxis in neutrophils (data not shown). Anti-Lkn-1 Abs neutralized almost all neutrophil chemotactic activity but did not affect the chemotaxis of IL-8. Control rabbit Ig failed to block the activity of rLkn-1 (Fig. 2GoB). Moreover, a checkerboard analysis (17) revealed that the migration-stimulating effect of rLkn-1 was chemotactic in nature but not chemokinetic for neutrophils (Fig. 2GoC).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Chemotactic response of human neutrophils to rLkn-1, hMIP-1{alpha}, or Il-8. A, Chemotaxis. Human neutrophils were exposed to increasing concentrations of the indicated chemokines in a microchamber, and the number of cells that migrated through the membrane were counted microscopically at x1000 magnification in five randomly selected fields per well. All assays were performed in triplicate. The results were expressed as the CI, calculated from the number of cells migrating to the test chemokines divided by that migrating to the control. These results represent a single experiment among five performed with similar results. B, Neutralization experiment. Neutrophil migration in response to rLkn-1 was inhibited by specific Abs. A total of 1000 ng/ml or 500 ng/ml IL-8 were preincubated with 10 mg/ml of polyclonal Abs against rLkn-1 or with rabbit Ig fraction as a control for 30 min at 37°C and then used for chemotaxis. C, A checkerboard-type analysis. rLkn-1 was added to only lower wells at 1000 ng/ml for determination of chemotaxis or to both the upper and lower wells at 1000 ng/ml for determination of chemokinesis. Assays were performed in triplicate.

 
rLkn-1 and hMIP-1{alpha} share a neutrophil signaling pathway to calcium mobilization

While Lkn-1 and hMIP-1{alpha} share certain properties such as binding to CCR1 and suppression of colony formation by bone marrow stem/progenitor cells, only Lkn-1 is chemotactic for neutrophils. We then examined their receptor usage using a calcium flux assay. The two forms of Lkn-1 induced calcium flux in neutrophils and fully desensitized each other, which is consistent with the chemotaxis data (Fig. 2Go). Importantly, Lkn-1i completely desensitized the response of neutrophils to 50 nM hMIP-1{alpha}. However, hMIP-1{alpha} failed to desensitize the response of neutrophils to the same amount of rLkn-1i (Fig. 3GoA). The rLkn-1-induced calcium flux in neutrophils was dose-dependent with a threshold < 5 nM (Fig. 3GoB). hMIP-1{alpha} strongly induced calcium mobilization in PBMC, demonstrating that the chemokine was active (data not shown). These data suggest that rLkn-1 shares a signaling pathway with hMIP-1{alpha}, but that rLkn-1 was a more potent inducer of calcium mobilization than was hMIP-1{alpha} in human neutrophils.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Calcium flux response of neutrophils to rLkn-1. Fura-2/AM-loaded neutrophils were exposed sequentially to 50 nM of the indicated chemokines. Calcium flux assays were performed at least three times, and representative data is shown here. A, Cross-desensitization of neutrophils between the indicated chemokines at 50 nM. B, Dose-response curve of calcium flux induced by rLkn-1. The result was expressed as peak amplitude of relative fluorescence.

 
There have been conflicting reports regarding the expression of CCR3 on neutrophils (18, 19). We next wished to determine whether Lkn-1 signaling could occur in neutrophils through CCR3. When we challenged neutrophils with 100 nM eotaxin, the most potent known CCR3 agonist, calcium flux was not observed in the neutrophils. In a parallel assay, eotaxin induced calcium flux in eosinophils (data not shown). These support previously published studies showing neutrophils lack expression of CCR3 (19).

CCR1 mediates Lkn-1 action in mouse neutrophils

Lkn-1 is an agonist for human CCR1 and CCR3 (13), but as stated above, neutrophils do not express CCR3 (19). We used neutrophils from CCR1+/+ and CCR1-/- mice to assess the role of CCR1 in Lkn-1 signaling. In neutrophils from CCR1+/+ mice, rLkn-1i was a potent inducer of calcium mobilization. Cross-desensitization experiments demonstrated that rLkn-1i completely desensitized the response of neutrophils to hMIP-1{alpha}, while hMIP-1{alpha} at 200 nM failed to abolish the calcium flux response to Lkn-1i in mouse neutrophils (Fig. 4GoA). Notably, rLkn-1i did not affect FMLP-induced calcium flux (Sigma) in neutrophils. In neutrophils from CCR1-/- mice, the FMLP-induced signal was observed, but responses to hMIP-1{alpha} and rLkn-1i were absent (Fig. 4GoB). These results demonstrate that CCR1 is a receptor for Lkn-1 and MIP-1{alpha} on mouse neutrophils.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Calcium mobilization response of mouse neutrophils to rLkn-1. Mouse neutrophils were isolated from thioglycollate-injected mouse peritoneal cavities and stimulated with the indicated chemokines or with FMLP at the indicated concentrations. A, Calcium flux of neutrophils derived from CCR1 wild-type mice by rLkn-1 or hMIP-1{alpha}. B, Calcium flux of neutrophils derived from CCR1-/- mice by rLkn-1 or hMIP-1{alpha}.

 
Receptor binding assay

We next compared the binding properties of hMIP-1{alpha} and rLkn-1 to human neutrophils. Scatchard analysis revealed a single class of receptors for hMIP-1{alpha} and for rLkn-1 on human neutrophils with Kd of ~3.2 nM and 1.1 nM, respectively. These data indicate that the receptor(s) shows different affinity for hMIP-1{alpha} and rLkn-1 and that human neutrophils expressed receptors for both Lkn-1 and hMIP-1{alpha} at a density of ~2 x 104 binding sites per cell (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Binding characteristics of 125I-Lkn-1 or hMIP-1{alpha} to human neutrophils. A and C, Saturable binding of 125I-Lkn-1 or hMIP-1{alpha} to human neutrophils. A total of 2 x 106 cells were incubated for 1 h at 4°C with indicated concentrations of 125I-Lkn-1 or hMIP-1{alpha}. Nonspecific binding determined by the addition of a 100-fold excess of the corresponding unlabeled ligand was subtracted. Representative results from three separate experiments are shown here. B and D, Scatchard analysis of the binding data. A single class of receptors for both Lkn-1 and hMIP-1{alpha} with a calculated Kd of 1.1 nM and 3.2 nM, respectively. Human neutrophils expressed receptor for both Lkn-1 and hMIP-1{alpha} at a density of ~2 x 104 binding sites per cell.

 
Lkn-1 induced recruitment of neutrophils into mouse peritoneum in vivo

We further tested whether rLkn-1 can attract neutrophils in vivo because it induced chemotaxis in human neutrophils and calcium mobilization in neutrophils from wild-type mice. Intraperitoneal injection of rLkn-1i produced a remarkable increase in the total number of peritoneal cells within 2 h, increasing in the number of neutrophils from (0.23 ± 0.01) x 106 cells per mouse injected with PBS or (0.46 ± 0.07) x 106 cells per mouse injected with HSA, to (1.13 ± 0.14) x 106 cells per rLkn-1-injected mouse (Fig. 6Go) (p < 0.006, compared with HSA). The increase in the number of neutrophils seen with HSA injection may indicate a nonspecific recruitment of neutrophils in response to the foreign protein. rLkn-1 injection also increases the number of monocytes and lymphocytes (data not shown). These in vivo results support our findings with human neutrophils in vitro.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. rLkn-1 induced recruitment of neutrophils to the peritoneum. Peritoneal exudate was collected from C3H mice 2 h after injection of Lkn-1 or control PBS or HSA (six mice/group), and the total number of cells were counted by hemocytometer. The subtypes of leukocytes in three randomly selected oil-immersion fields per section were differentially determined by microscopic examination after Diff-Quick staining. Data shown are representative of three experiments with similar results.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CC chemokines are known to act on monocytes, lymphocytes, basophils, and eosinophils, but usually do not target neutrophils (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). However, the CC chemokines myeloid progenitor inhibitory factor 1 (20) and liver and activation-regulated chemokine (21) were shown to have chemotactic activities for neutrophils. In the present study, we found that Lkn-1, a CC-chemokine, induced the migration and activation of human neutrophils by signaling through CCR1. The ability of Lkn-1 to stimulate chemotaxis of neutrophils distinguishes it from other CCR1 agonists such as hMIP-1{alpha}. McColl et al. (22) and Gao et al. (23) found that hMIP-1{alpha}, which has ~43% identity to Lkn-1 at the amino acid level (13), was able to induce calcium flux in neutrophils. However, McColl et al. observed no detectable effect on chemotaxis (22), which agrees with the results presented in this report. Lkn-1 elicited both calcium mobilization and chemotaxis in human neutrophils (Figs. 2GoA and 3A). It is possible that the observed increase in intracellular calcium following hMIP-1{alpha} stimulation was not adequate to activate a calcium-dependent response such as chemotaxis (24). Interestingly, mouse MIP-1 {alpha}, unlike hMIP-1{alpha}, induces both chemotaxis and calcium mobilization by signaling through CCR1 in mouse cells (16). CCR1 may play a more important role in mouse neutrophils than human neutrophils to compensate for the apparent absence of CXCR1 on mouse neutrophils (16). However, the finding that human neutrophils lack expression of CCR1 (25) is inconsistent with data from our and other labs (13, 15, 16, 18).

Both chemotaxis and calcium mobilization data (Figs. 2Go and 3Go) indicated that an unidentified receptor specific for Lkn-1 may exist on neutrophils or that Lkn-1 may have higher binding affinity than hMIP-1{alpha} to CCR1 on human neutrophils. To determine whether there is an unidentified receptor specific for Lkn-1 on neutrophils, we used CCR1-deficient mice to examine whether Lkn-1 induced calcium mobilization in CCR1-/- neutrophils. As shown in Fig. 4GoB, CCR1 is the only class of receptor used to mediate responses of murine neutrophils to hMIP-1{alpha} and Lkn-1. We next compared the binding affinities between hMIP-1{alpha} and rLkn-1 in human neutrophils. Scatchard analysis demonstrates that Lkn-1 has a higher binding affinity than hMIP-1{alpha} to its receptor on human neutrophils, but that both chemokines bind to receptors with a single affinity (Fig. 5Go).

The structural difference between hMIP-1{alpha} and Lkn-1 may be responsible for the difference of their biological effects. Lkn-1 contains two extra cysteines, which may form a third disulfide bond. How this structural change may effect receptor interactions is unclear. We are unable to explain the discrepancy between our data (13 and this report) and the report where MIP-5/HCC2 was shown to be inactive on human neutrophils (14). The observed differences in neutrophil chemotaxis may be a result of different assay conditions for chemotaxis or alternate methods of neutrophil isolation. In summary, we have demonstrated that Lkn-1 is a strong chemoattractant for neutrophils by both in vivo and in vitro assays. Our data supports that even though hMIP-1{alpha} and Lkn-1 signal through CCR1 in neutrophils, only Lkn-1 is chemotactic for neutrophils. The factors responsible for differential sorting of receptor signals to effector functions remains to be determined.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Mark H. Kaplan for help in writing this manuscript; Ihn-Kyung Jang for helping making the graphs; Patricia Mantel, Sister Mary Etta Kiefer, and Dr. Young-J. Kim for editing; and Audrey Carson for typing this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI 28125 and DE 12156 (to B.S.K.) and research funds from the University of Ulsan and Molecular Medicine Program (98-MM-02-01-A-04), Ministry of Science and Technology, Korea. Back

2 S.M.Z. and B.S.Y. contributed equally to this work. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Byoung S. Kwon, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5120. E-mail address: Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: Lkn-1, leukotactin-1; hMIP-1{alpha}, human macrophage inflammatory protein 1{alpha}; rLkn-1i, intact rLkn-1; rLkn-1c; cleaved rLkn-1; CI, chemotactic index. Back

Received for publication May 26, 1998. Accepted for publication January 29, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Baggiolini, M., C. A. Dahinden. 1994. CC chemokines in allergic inflammation. Immunol. Today 15:127.[Medline]
  2. Kelner, S. G., J. Kennedy, K. B. Bacon, S. Kleyensteuber, D. A. Largaespada, N. K. Jenkins, N. G. Copeland, J. F. Bazan, K. W. Moore, T. J. Schall, A. Zlotnik. 1994. Lymphotactin: a cytokine that represents a new class of chemokine. Science 266:1395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bazan, J. F., K. B. Bacon, G. Hardiman, W. Wang, K. Soo, D. Rossi, D. R. Greaves, A. Zlotnik, T. J. Schall. 1997. A new class of membrane-bound chemokine with a CX3C motif. Nature 385:640.[Medline]
  4. Baggiolini, M., B. Dewald, B. Moser. 1994. Interleukin-8 and related chemotactic cytokines-CXC and CC chemokines. Adv. Immunol. 55:99.
  5. Miller, M. D., M. S. Krangel. 1992. Biology and biochemistry of the chemokines: a family of chemotactic and inflammatory cytokines. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 12:17.[Medline]
  6. Schall, T. J.. 1994. The chemokines. A. Thomson, ed. The Cytokine Handbook 419.-460. Academic Press, London.
  7. Ben-Baruch, A., D. F. Michiel, J. J. Oppenheim. 1995. Signals and receptors involved in recruitment of inflammatory cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270:11703.[Free Full Text]
  8. Sozzani, S., M. Locati, D. Zhou, M. Rieppi, W. Luini, G. Lamorte, G. Bianchi, N. Polentarutti, P. Allavena, A. Mantovani. 1995. Receptors, signal transduction and spectrum of action of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and related chemokines. J. Leukocyte Biol. 57:788.[Abstract]
  9. Sozzani, S., F. Sallusto, W. Luini, D. Zhou, L. Piemonti, P. Allavena, J. Van Damme, S. Valitutti, A. Lanzavecchia, A. Mantovani. 1995. Migration of dendritic cell in response to formy1 peptides, C5a and a distinct set of chemokines. J. Immunol. 155:3292.[Abstract]
  10. Mantovani, A., S. Sozzani, P. Proost, J. Van Damme. 1996. The monocyte chemoattractant protein family. R. Horuk, ed. Chemoattractant Ligands and Their Receptors 169.-192. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  11. Kennedy, J., G. S. Kelner, S. Kleyensteuber, T. J. Schall, M. C. Weiss, H. Yssel, P. V. Schneider, B. G. Cocks, K. B. Bacon, A. Zlotnik. 1995. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of human lymphotactin. J. Immunol. 155:203.[Abstract]
  12. Bianchi, G., S. Sozzani, A. Zlotnik, A. Mantovani, P. Allavena. 1996. Migratory response of human NK cells to lymphotactin. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:3238.[Medline]
  13. Youn, B.S., S. M. Zhang, E. K. Lee, D. H. Park, H. E. Broxmeyer, P. M. Murphy, M. Locati, J. E. Pease, K. K. Kim, K. Antol, B. S. Kwon. 1997. Molecular cloning of leukotactin-1: a novel human ß-chemokine, a chemoattractant for neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes, and a potent agonist at CC chemokine receptors 1 and 3. J. Immunol. 159:5201.[Abstract]
  14. Coulin, F., C. A. Power, S. Alouani, M. Peitsch, J. M. Schroeder, M. Moshizuki, I. Clark-Lewis, T. N. C. Wells. 1997. Characterization of macrophage inflammatory protein-5/human CC cytokine-2, a member of the macrophage-inflammatory-protein family of chemokines. Eur. J. Biochem. 248:507.[Medline]
  15. Youn, B. S., S. M. Zhang, H. E. Broxmeyer, S. Cooper, K. Antol, M. Fraser, B. S. Kwon. 1998. Characterization of Ckß8 and Ckß8–1: two alternatively spliced forms of human ß-chemokine, chemoattractants for neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes, and potent agonists at CC chemokine receptor 1. Blood 91:3118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Gao Ji-liang, T. A., Y. Wynn, E. J. Chang, H. E. Lee, S. Broxmeyer, H. L. Cooper, H. Tiffany, J. Kwon Westphal, -C hung, P. M. Murphy. 1997. Impaired host defense, hematopoiesis, granulomatous inflammation and type1-type 2 cytokine balance in mice lacking CC chemokine receptor 1. J. Exp. Med. 185:1959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Nagira, M., T. Imai, K. Hieshima, J. Kusuda, M. Ridanpaa, S. Takagi, M. Nishimura, M. Kakizaki, M. Nomiyama, O. Yoshie. 1997. Molecular cloning of a novel human CC chemokine secondary lymphoid-tissue chemokine that is a potent chemoattractant for lymphocytes and mapped to chromosome 9 p13. J. Biol. Chem. 272:19518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Bonecchi, R., G. Bianchi, P. P. Bordignon, D. D. Ambrosio, R. Lang, A. Borsatti, S. Sozzani, P. Allavena, P. A. Gray, A. Mantovani, F. Sinigaglia. 1998. Differential expression of chemokine receptor and chemotactic responsiveness of type 1 T helper cells (Th1s) and Th2s. J. Exp. Med. 187:129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Combadiere, C., S. K. Ahuja, P. M. Murphy. 1995. Cloning and functional expression of a human eosinophil CC chemokine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 270:16491.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Patel, V. P., B. L. Kreider., Y. Li, H. Li, K. Leung, T. Salcedo, B. Nardelli, V. Pippalla, S. Gentz, R. Thotakura, D. Parmelee, R. Gentz, G. Garotta. 1997. Molecular and functional characterization of two novel human C-C chemokines as inhibitors of two distinct classes of myeloid progenitors. J. Exp. Med. 185:1163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hieshima, K., T. Imai, G. Opdenakker, J. Van Damme, J. Kusuda, H. Tei, Y. Sakaki, K. Takatsuki, R. Miura, O. Yoshie, H. Nomiyama. 1997. Molecular cloning of a novel human CC chemokine liver and activation- regulated chemokine (LARC) expressed in liver. J. Biol. Chem. 272:5846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. McColl, S. R., M. Hachicha, S. Levasseur, K. Neote, T. J. Schall. 1993. Uncoupling of early signal transduction events from effector function in human peripheral blood neutrophils in response to recombinant macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha} and protein-1ß. J. Immunol. 150:4550.[Abstract]
  23. Gao, J.-L., D. B. Kuhns, H. L. Tiffany, D. McDermott, X. Li, U. Francke, P. M. Murphy. 1993. Structure and functional expression of the human macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha}/RANTES receptor. J. Exp. Med. 177:1421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Kraus, E., R. Niederman. 1990. Changes in neutrophils right-angle light scatter can occur independently of alteration in cytoskeletal actin. Cytometry 11:272.[Medline]
  25. Su, S. B, N. Mukaida, J. Wang, N. Nomura, K. Matsushima. 1996. Preparation of specific polyclonal antibodies to a C-C chemokine receptor, CCR1, and determination of CCR1 expression on various types of leukocytes. J. Leukocyte Biol. 60:658.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Hartl, S. Krauss-Etschmann, B. Koller, P. L. Hordijk, T. W. Kuijpers, F. Hoffmann, A. Hector, E. Eber, V. Marcos, I. Bittmann, et al.
Infiltrated Neutrophils Acquire Novel Chemokine Receptor Expression and Chemokine Responsiveness in Chronic Inflammatory Lung Diseases
J. Immunol., December 1, 2008; 181(11): 8053 - 8067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. Ferrandi, V. Ardissone, P. Ferro, T. Ruckle, P. Zaratin, E. Ammannati, E. Hauben, C. Rommel, and R. Cirillo
Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase {gamma} Inhibition Plays a Crucial Role in Early Steps of Inflammation by Blocking Neutrophil Recruitment
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2007; 322(3): 923 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. P. Gladue, S. H. Cole, M. L. Roach, L. A. Tylaska, R. T. Nelson, R. M. Shepard, J. D. McNeish, K. T. Ogborne, and K. S. Neote
The Human Specific CCR1 Antagonist CP-481,715 Inhibits Cell Infiltration and Inflammatory Responses in Human CCR1 Transgenic Mice.
J. Immunol., March 1, 2006; 176(5): 3141 - 3148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Richter, R. Bistrian, S. Escher, W.-G. Forssmann, J. Vakili, R. Henschler, N. Spodsberg, A. Frimpong-Boateng, and U. Forssmann
Quantum Proteolytic Activation of Chemokine CCL15 by Neutrophil Granulocytes Modulates Mononuclear Cell Adhesiveness
J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1599 - 1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
C. D. L. Ramos, C. Canetti, J. T. Souto, J. S. Silva, C. M. Hogaboam, S. H. Ferreira, and F. Q. Cunha
MIP-1{alpha}[CCL3] acting on the CCR1 receptor mediates neutrophil migration in immune inflammation via sequential release of TNF-{alpha} and LTB4
J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2005; 78(1): 167 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. D. Berahovich, Z. Miao, Y. Wang, B. Premack, M. C. Howard, and T. J. Schall
Proteolytic Activation of Alternative CCR1 Ligands in Inflammation
J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 7341 - 7351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. A. Wysocki, A. Panoskaltsis-Mortari, B. R. Blazar, and J. S. Serody
Leukocyte migration and graft-versus-host disease
Blood, June 1, 2005; 105(11): 4191 - 4199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
R. B. Dorman, J. S. Gujral, M. L. Bajt, A. Farhood, and H. Jaeschke
Generation and functional significance of CXC chemokines for neutrophil-induced liver injury during endotoxemia
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): G880 - G886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
X. Zeng, T. A. Moore, M. W. Newstead, R. Hernandez-Alcoceba, W. C. Tsai, and T. J. Standiford
Intrapulmonary Expression of Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 1{alpha} (CCL3) Induces Neutrophil and NK Cell Accumulation and Stimulates Innate Immunity in Murine Bacterial Pneumonia
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2003; 71(3): 1306 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Garcia-Ramallo, T. Marques, N. Prats, J. Beleta, S. L. Kunkel, and N. Godessart
Resident Cell Chemokine Expression Serves as the Major Mechanism for Leukocyte Recruitment During Local Inflammation
J. Immunol., December 1, 2002; 169(11): 6467 - 6473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
T. M. Tumpey, R. Fenton, S. Molesworth-Kenyon, J. E. Oakes, and R. N. Lausch
Role for Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 2 (MIP-2), MIP-1{alpha}, and Interleukin-1{alpha} in the Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Response to Viral Antigen
J. Virol., July 17, 2002; 76(16): 8050 - 8057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. Gouwy, S. Struyf, F. Mahieu, W. Put, P. Proost, and J. Van Damme
The Unique Property of the CC Chemokine Regakine-1 to Synergize with Other Plasma-Derived Inflammatory Mediators in Neutrophil Chemotaxis Does Not Reside in Its NH2-Terminal Structure
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2002; 62(1): 173 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Braun, M. Wunderlin, K. Spieth, W. Knochel, P. Gierschik, and B. Moepps
Xenopus laevis Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1: Conservation of Structure and Function During Vertebrate Development
J. Immunol., March 1, 2002; 168(5): 2340 - 2347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
U. Forssmann, H.-J. Magert, K. Adermann, S. E. Escher, and W.-G. Forssmann
Hemofiltrate CC chemokines with unique biochemical properties: HCC-1/CCL14a and HCC-2/CCL15
J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2001; 70(3): 357 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. R. Hall, E. Diaconu, R. Patel, and E. Pearlman
CXC Chemokine Receptor 2 But Not C-C Chemokine Receptor 1 Expression Is Essential for Neutrophil Recruitment to the Cornea in Helminth-Mediated Keratitis (River Blindness)
J. Immunol., March 15, 2001; 166(6): 4035 - 4041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. S. Cheng, J. J. Lai, N. W. Lukacs, and S. L. Kunkel
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor Up-Regulates CCR1 in Human Neutrophils
J. Immunol., January 15, 2001; 166(2): 1178 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. C. Lee, M. E. Brummet, S. Shahabuddin, T. G. Woodworth, S. N. Georas, K. M. Leiferman, S. C. Gilman, C. Stellato, R. P. Gladue, R. P. Schleimer, et al.
Cutaneous Injection of Human Subjects with Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1{alpha} Induces Significant Recruitment of Neutrophils and Monocytes
J. Immunol., March 15, 2000; 164(6): 3392 - 3401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Elsner, M. Mack, H. Bruhl, Y. Dulkys, D. Kimmig, G. Simmons, P. R. Clapham, D. Schlondorff, A. Kapp, T. N. C. Wells, et al.
Differential Activation of CC Chemokine Receptors by AOP-RANTES
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2000; 275(11): 7787 - 7794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
P. M. Murphy, M. Baggiolini, I. F. Charo, C. A. Hebert, R. Horuk, K. Matsushima, L. H. Miller, J. J. Oppenheim, and C. A. Power
International Union of Pharmacology. XXII. Nomenclature for Chemokine Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2000; 52(1): 145 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Tokuda, M. Itakura, N. Onai, H. Kimura, T. Kuriyama, and K. Matsushima
Pivotal Role of CCR1-Positive Leukocytes in Bleomycin- Induced Lung Fibrosis in Mice
J. Immunol., March 1, 2000; 164(5): 2745 - 2751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kwon, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kwon, B. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS