|
|
||||||||
1


*
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80261
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-1ß are proinflammatory cytokines involved
in the pathogenesis of many infectious and noninfectious inflammatory
diseases. To reduce IL-1 toxicity, extracellular domains of the soluble
(s) IL-1R are shed from cell membranes and prevent triggering of
cell-bound receptors. We investigated to what extent murine sIL-1RI can
neutralize the IL-1 produced by LPS-stimulated macrophages. When mouse
peritoneal macrophages were incubated with LPS, addition of sIL-1RI
significantly inhibited the bioactivity of IL-1. Stimulation of cells
with sIL-1RI alone induced no bioactive IL-1. When immunoreactive
cytokine concentrations were measured with specific radioimmunoassays,
sIL-1RI alone appeared to induce a significant release of IL-1
in a
concentration-dependent manner. This effect was independent of new
protein synthesis. The production of IL-1ß or TNF-
was not
influenced by sIL-1RI. There was no interference of sIL-1RI with the
IL-1
radioimmunoassay. In mice, an i.v. injection of sIL-RI alone
induced a rapid release of IL-1
, but not of TNF-
or IL-1ß.
Treatment of mice with sIL-1RI improved the survival during a lethal
infection with Candida albicans. In conclusion, sIL-1RI
induces a rapid release of IL-1
from cells, as well as into the
systemic circulation. Although this IL-1
may be inactivated in
circulation by the same sIL-1RI, this phenomenon probably has
immunostimulatory effects at local levels where the sIL-1RI-induced
IL-1
acts in a paracrine or autocrine manner. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-1ß are proinflammatory cytokines that play a central role in
the regulation of inflammatory reactions occurring during severe
infections (1). When infused into animals, IL-1 causes a syndrome
resembling sepsis, with fever, increased vascular permeability,
hypotension, multiple organ failure, and eventually death (2). In
humans, IL-1 infusion is accompanied by fever, chills, hypotension, and
production of IL-6 (1, 3). These effects are potentiated by concomitant
administration of TNF-
, another main proinflammatory mediator in
sepsis (2). Inhibition of IL-1 or TNF production with pharmacological
agents (4), or blockade of membrane IL-1Rs with IL-1R antagonist
(IL-1Ra)3 (5, 6) in experimental
models of lethal endotoxemia results in protection of the animals.
These experimental data have indicated that IL-1 inhibition might be a
potential therapeutic approach in severe infections. For IL-1Ra to work, high levels are needed to block all receptors on relevant cells. This requires large amounts of IL-1Ra, since only 1% of IL-1Rs need to be occupied to induce a signal (1). In contrast, neutralizing the circulating IL-1 is easier, since IL-1 concentrations during diseases are in the picomolar range, with relatively small amounts of IL-1 being produced during disease. Therefore, use of soluble receptors acting like neutralizing Abs can prove more succesful.
Soluble IL-1Rs (sIL-1R) are naturally occurring regulatory proteins
that influence the biological activities of IL-1. Type I IL-1R (IL-1RI)
is found on most cells and it appears to mediate all the IL-1 actions
(1). In contrast, type II IL-1R (IL-1RII) has no signaling function and
is considered to act as a "decoy" receptor (7). Soluble recombinant
forms of IL-1RI (sIL-1RI) have been developed, and their binding
characteristics to IL-1 are similar to those of membrane IL-1RI (8).
Administration of sIL-1RI in vivo improves the survival of heart
allografts (9), protects from experimental autoimmune diabetes (10),
improves the severity of active arthritis (11), and autoimmune
encephalomyelitis (12). A recent study by Preas et al. (13) has shown
that sIL-1RI administration to human volunteers is able to reduce some
of the inflammatory effects of LPS, such as IL-1ß induction, while it
has stimulatory effects on TNF-
and IL-8 synthesis.
Despite the data indicating that sIL-1RI is a potential modulatory agent of IL-1-mediated pathways, few data are available about the mechanisms responsible for these effects or the possible direct actions of sIL-1RI, as suggested by the study of Preas et al. (13). The aim of the present study was to assess the capacity of recombinant murine sIL-1RI to bind and neutralize bioactive IL-1, and to investigate the possible stimulatory effects of sIL-1RI on cytokine synthesis by murine cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
sIL-1RI was generously provided by Dr. M. B. Widmer
(Immunex, Seattle, WA). Recombinant IL-1
was a gift of Dr. P.
Lomedico (Hoffmann-LaRoche, Nutley, NJ) and recombinant IL-1ß a gift
of Dr. P. Graber (Glaxo, Geneva, Switzerland). LPS (Escherichia
coli serotype O55:B5) and cycloheximide were obtained from Sigma
(St. Louis, MO). IL-1
and IL-1ß were radioiodinated as previously
described (14).
125I-IL-1 binding to rIL-1RI
The in vitro binding of IL-1 with the sIL-1RI was investigated
using HPLC. The elution profile of 125I-IL-1
on a Shodex
KW-802.5 column with a molecular mass range of 10050,000 Da (8
x 300 mm; Millipore, Milford, MA) was determined before and after
incubation with sIL-1RI. 125I-IL-1
(100 ng/ml) was
incubated with sIL-1RI (10 µg/ml) in PBS for 15 min at room
temperature. Phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 6.8) was used as the elution
buffer. The flow rate was 0.5 ml/min.
Animals
CBA mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). For the experiments, 6- to 8-wk-old mice, weighing 2025 g, were used. The animals were fed standard laboratory chow (Hope Farms, Woerden, The Netherlands) and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions. The experiments were approved by the ethical committee on animal experiments of the Catholic University Nijmegen.
In vitro cytokine production
Resident peritoneal macrophages were harvested by rinsing the peritoneal cavity aseptically with cold PBS containing 0.38% (w/v) sodium citrate. After centrifugation for 10 min at 500 x g at 4°C, cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 DM (Flow Laboratories, Irvine, CA) containing 5% normal mouse serum, 1 mM pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 100 µg/ml gentamicin. A total of 105 cells/well were cultured in 96-well microtiter plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) in RPMI medium (final volume, 200 µl), with or without LPS (1 ng/ml) and/or sIL-1RI (10 ng/ml, unless indicated otherwise). Supernatants were collected after 24 h of incubation at 37°C and stored at -70°C until assay. To the remaining macrophages, 200 µl RPMI 1640 was added and the cells were disrupted by three freeze-thaw cycles to determine the cell-associated cytokine contents (15). The samples were stored at -70°C until cytokine measurements.
To test whether the detection of cytokines in the presence of sIL-1RI is due to an artifact in the radioimmunoassay or due to the presence of sIL-1RI in the medium, we coated the bottom of the wells with 1 µg/ml sIL-1RI by overnight incubation at 4°C. After blockage of nonspecific binding sites with 2% BSA and three vigorous washes with sterile PBS, 105 peritoneal macrophages were added to each well, and LPS stimulation was performed for 24 h at 37°C. Control wells were precoated with 2% BSA. The samples were collected and stored as described above.
In separate experiments, we investigated whether stimulation of cytokines by sIL-1RI is dependent on new protein synthesis. Mouse peritoneal macrophages were collected and stimulated with sIL-1RI as described above in the absence or in the presence of 1 µg/ml cycloheximide (16).
All the in vitro experiments used peritoneal macrophages from 10 animals and were performed at least twice.
In vivo stimulation of cytokine production
Groups of CBA mice were injected i.p. with LPS (10 µg/mouse),
sIL-1RI (2 µg/mouse), or a combination of both. The kinetics of
IL-1
, IL-1ß, and TNF-
production was studied by collecting the
blood in EDTA from the retroorbital plexus of separate subgroups of
five mice before and 30 min, 90 min, and 4 h after the challenge
with LPS and/or sIL-1RI to determine plasma cytokine concentration. To
test whether sIL-1RI could also induce IL-1
in neutropenic mice, the
animals were injected s.c. 4 days before treatment with sIL-1RI with
150 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Weesp, The
Netherlands), followed by injection of 100 mg/kg 1 day before
the challenge. This model of neutropenia maintains blood neutrophils at
levels lower than 100/mm3 (data not shown) (17). Cytokine
concentrations were measured 90 min after the challenge, as described
above.
The influence of sIL-1RI on IL-1 distribution and clearance in vivo
Groups of mice were treated with either 2 µg/ml sIL-1RI i.p.
or saline, immediately before i.v. infusion of 10 µCi radioiodinated
IL-1
or IL-1ß in 0.2 ml saline. Five minutes, 15 min, 30 min,
1 h, 6 h, and 24 h later, subgroups of five animals were
sacrificed and the distribution and clearance of 125I-IL-1
was compared in the sIL-1RI-treated and control mice by measuring the
percentages of the injected dose in the blood, liver, spleen, kidneys,
thymus, and lungs.
The effect of sIL-1RI treatment on Candida albicans infection
It has been previously shown that infection with C.
albicans can be beneficially influenced by treatment with IL-1
(17). To investigate whether the induction of IL-1
release by
sIL-1RI may have beneficial effects on the course of murine
candidiasis, groups of 15 CBA mice were treated with either 2 µg/ml
sIL-1RI i.p. or saline immediately before the mice were infected i.v.
with 5 x 105 CFU C. albicans (strain UC
820) (18). From both groups, five animals were sacrificed on day 1
after the infection, and the circulating cytokine concentrations were
measured in plasma. In the remaining 10 mice/group, survival was
assessed daily for 4 wk. To test whether sIL-1RI could also exert
beneficial effects in neutropenic mice, the animals were injected s.c.
4 days before infection with 150 mg/kg cyclophosphamide,
followed by injection of 100 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide 1 day
before and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 days after i.v. infection with
104 CFU C. albicans. The repeated
cyclophosphamide administrations were performed to assure persistent
neutropenia during the prolonged infection with C.
albicans.
Cytokine measurements
IL-1 bioactivity was determined using the murine thymoma cell
line EL-4 NOB-1 (ECACC, Porton Down, Salisbury, U.K.) as an
IL-1-specific cell-producing IL-2 response, in combination with the
IL-2-sensitive CTLL-2 cells (ECACC) (19). TNF-
, IL-1
, and IL-1ß
immunoreactive concentrations were determined using specific fluid
phase RIAs, as described previously (20). Detection limits were 40
pg/ml for TNF-
and 20 pg/ml for IL-1
and IL-1ß. Control
experiments were performed to determine whether sIL-1RI alters the
cytokine RIAs. When added to standard cytokine samples used for the
calibration of the standard curves, sIL-1RI in the range tested (0.1
ng/ml to 1 µg/ml) had no influence on the assay (Fig. 1
).
|
Differences between groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Upon in vitro incubation with 0.1 mg/ml sIL-1RI, the retention
time of 125I-IL-1
on the Shodex KW-802.5 gel filtration
column was reduced from 22 to 16 min, indicating almost complete
complexation of the radioiodinated IL-1
with the sIL-1RI. When mouse
peritoneal macrophages were incubated with sIL-1RI alone, no bioactive
IL-1 could be detected in the supernatant. LPS stimulation led to
synthesis of bioactive IL-1 (699 ± 588 pg/ml), and addition of 10
ng/ml sIL-1RI was able to significantly reduce this amount (223 ±
105 pg/ml, p < 0.03) (Fig. 2
).
|
in vitro
The synthesis and release of immunoreactive IL-1
, IL-1ß, and
TNF-
in response to LPS or sIL-1RI stimulation was investigated in
the same set of experiments. Stimulation of murine macrophages with
sIL-1RI resulted in high concentrations of IL-1
in the supernatant.
This release was 2-fold higher than that observed after LPS
stimulation, and the combination of sIL-1RI with LPS did not induce
more IL-1
than sIL-1RI challenge did itself (Fig. 3
). The effect of sIL-RI on IL-1
induction was concentration-dependent (Fig. 4
). Levels of IL-1ß or TNF-
were
unaffected (Fig. 3
). The concentration of cell-associated cytokines was
not influenced by sIL-1RI stimulation (data not shown).
|
|
in the RIA (although control experiments demonstrated the contrary; see
Fig. 1
(152 ±
39 vs 28 ± 8 pg/ml, p < 0.01) was found again.
In a separate set of experiments we assessed whether induction of
IL-1
release by sIL-1RI is dependent on new protein synthesis.
Reducing new protein synthesis with cycloheximide (16) did not affect
the IL-1
release induced by sIL-1RI (192 ± 20 pg/ml in the
absence, vs 218 ± 21 pg/ml in the presence of cycloheximide,
p > 0.05). This finding points to release of preformed
IL-1
.
sIL-1RI induces the release of immunoreactive IL-1
in vivo
The capacity of sIL-1RI to induce IL-1
release in vivo was
investigated by challenging mice with 2 µg/mouse sIL-1RI i.p.
Challenge of mice with the vehicle alone had no stimulatory activity on
cytokine production. sIL-1RI induced a rapid rise of IL-1
concentration in the circulation, with a peak already after 30 min
(Fig. 5
a). LPS-induced IL-1
had slower kinetics, and LPS induced lower IL-1
concentrations (Fig. 5
a). No induction of IL-1ß (Fig. 5
b) or TNF-
(Fig. 5
c) by sIL-1RI challenge was apparent. Similarly, 90
min after challenge of neutropenic mice with sIL-1RI, there was a
significant increase in plasma concentrations of IL-1
(88 ± 21
pg/ml) compared with the concentration in the placebo-treated mice
(<20 pg/ml, p < 0.01).
|
or
IL-1ß to the organs or their clearance from blood. Radioiodinated
IL-1
or IL-1ß was injected into mice pretreated with vehicle only
or sIL-1RI. The distribution of radiolabeled cytokines to liver,
spleen, kidneys, lungs, and thymus was not influenced by sIL-1RI
treatment (data not shown). The clearance of radiolabeled IL-1
(Fig. 6
|
While none of the mice infected with 1 x 105 CFU
C. albicans died (data not shown), all control mice infected
with 5 x 105 CFU C. albicans died during
the first 10 days of infection. Treatment of mice with sIL-1RI
significantly prolonged the survival of the mice infected with the high
inoculum of Candida (Fig. 7
a). In addition, sIL-1RI also
prolonged survival of neutropenic mice infected with C.
albicans (Fig. 7
b). The IL-1
concentrations one day
after infection with C. albicans were higher in mice treated
with sIL-1RI than that in mice receiving placebo (290 ± 20 vs
110 ± 50 pg/ml, p < 0.05).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, both in
vitro and in vivo. The potential importance of this effect is
illustrated by the beneficial effects of sIL-1RI administration on the
course of murine disseminated candidiasis, an experimental infection in
which IL-1 has protective effects. These protective effects are
probably due to local autocrine and paracrine effects of
sIL-1RI-induced IL-1
, since several studies in the literature
suggest that the bioactive IL-1
released into the circulation is
neutralized by the same sIL-1RI (9, 10, 11, 12), which was also confirmed by
our observations. It is well established that recombinant forms of sIL-1RI have similar IL-1 binding characteristics as the membrane-associated form (8). In our experiments, we confirm that the recombinant form of murine sIL-1RI binds to both mouse IL-1 species. When mouse peritoneal macrophages were stimulated with LPS, the IL-1 biological activity of the resulting supernatants was significantly reduced. Our data are in line with the report of Preas et al. (13), who also reported decreased circulating IL-1ß concentrations after sIL-1RI infusion during experimental endotoxemia in humans. This inhibition may account for the beneficial effects of sIL-1RI treatment in experimental models of autoimmune diabetes (10), heart transplantation (9), active arthritis (11), and autoimmune encephalitis (12).
In contrast to bioactivity, the immunoreactive concentrations of
cytokines measured after sIL-1RI challenge revealed that a significant
increase of IL-1
release had occurred (Fig. 3
a).
sIL-1RI exerted this effect in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 4
). An artifact in the immunoassay was excluded by control experiments
showing no influence of high sIL-1RI concentrations on the RIA standard
curves, indicating that our RIA measures both free and
sIL-1RI-complexed IL-1. Moreover, to further exclude artefacts in the
assay, wells were precoated with sIL-1RI and stimulation of IL-1
release by fixed sIL-1RI was performed. The finding of high IL-1
concentrations in these supernatants in which no sIL-1RI was present
proves a true effect of the soluble receptor on IL-1
release and
demonstrates that this effect of sIL-1RI is not an artefact. Incubation
of macrophages with sIL-1RI in vitro did not result in elevated IL-1ß
or TNF-
levels. The stimulatory action of sIL-1RI was also
investigated in vivo, and the same phenomenon was observed: sIL-1RI
induced a rapid increase in IL-1
concentrations that already reached
peak elevation 30 min after the administration, without a comparable
increase in IL-1ß or TNF. The rapid kinetics suggests release of
"preformed" IL-1
from the cells, rather than de novo protein
synthesis. Indeed, the blockade of protein synthesis with cycloheximide
showed that IL-1
induction by sIL-1RI is independent on de novo
protein synthesis. A similar rapid release of preformed IL-1
has
been previously reported in rats subjected to thermal injury (21).
Interestingly, sIL-1RI was also able to induce a significant release of
IL-1
in neutropenic mice, indicating that other cell types than
neutrophils, such as for example endothelial cells, are also a source
of the cytokine (1). However, the fact that the concentrations of
sIL-1RI-induced IL-1
were an order of magnitude higher in
nonneutropenic mice compared with those in neutropenic mice, indicates
that neutrophils are a major source of preformed IL-1
.
Whereas sIL-1RI could not induce IL-1ß, in contrast with the strong
stimulation of this cytokine by LPS, the soluble receptor was much more
potent than LPS for the induction of IL-1
. This differential
induction of the two members of the IL-1 family, together with the
higher affinity of sIL-1RI for IL-1
than for IL-1ß (1), may
explain why sIL-1RI present in the supernatants of the experiments
shown in Fig. 2
was able to completely inhibit the IL-1 bioactivity
induced by sIL-1RI alone, but not by the combination LPS+sIL-1RI.
Indeed, sIL-1RI alone would induce only IL-1
, which would be bound
with high affinity by the same sIL-1RI in the supernatant, and thus be
neutralized completely. In contrast, the LPS would also stimulate
IL-1ß synthesis. The lower affinity of sIL-1RI for IL-1ß probably
results in certain amounts of unbound cytokine, explaining the residual
IL-1 bioactivity after stimulation with the combination of LPS and
sIL-1RI.
Stimulatory effects of sIL-1RI during experimental endotoxemia in
humans have been recently reported by others (13). When administered
together with LPS, sIL-1RI induced higher levels of C-reactive protein
and higher peak concentrations of TNF-
and IL-8 than in volunteers
challenged with LPS alone. It was suggested that these effects are, at
least in part, due to binding and inactivation of IL-1Ra by sIL-1RI
(13). However, inactivation of IL-1Ra was found 3 h after LPS
administration, whereas TNF-
was induced before that, as early as 90
min after the LPS challenge (13). The hypothesis that at least some of
these effects are exerted directly by sIL-1RI are supported by our data
showing a rapid release of IL-1
, with the peak levels already
present 30 min after LPS challenge.
It should be kept in mind that sIL-1RI induced other cytokines in mice
than those found in humans by Preas et al. (13), and in this respect
the mouse model may not represent what occurs in humans. There are
several other differences between our study and that of Preas et al.
which may account for some of the differences observed. First, whereas
we investigated mainly the direct effects of sIL-1RI, Preas et al. (13)
assessed the effect of sIL-1RI on LPS-induced cytokine production.
Second, even though the latter study reported increased TNF and IL-8
release in the sIL-1RI treatment groups, it was not investigated
whether these cytokines were bioactive or not. Thirdly, the release of
IL-1
was not investigated (13), as that might have been also
influenced by sIL-1RI. Possible effects of sIL-1RI on distribution or
clearance of IL-1 in vivo have been excluded by our experiments in
which radioiodinated IL-1
or IL-1ß were infused into mice together
with sIL-1RI or placebo.
An important question is whether the IL-1
induced by sIL-1RI is
biologically active. The biological activity of IL-1 could be exerted
at distance in an endocrine manner, and in the close vicinity of cells
in an autocrine and paracrine manner. The data presented in Fig. 2
show
that the cytokine is at least in part bound and neutralized by the
circulating sIL-1RI present in the system. It is therefore unlikely
that the released IL-1
would exert remote effects. However, the
rapid release of IL-1
from the cells upon sIL-1RI stimulation may
have important consequences at a local level, where paracrine and/or
autocrine actions of high local concentrations of IL-1
may be
expected. This hypothesis is underlined by the beneficial effects of
sIL-1RI during murine disseminated candidiasis, an experimental model
in which IL-1 treatment has proven beneficial (17). Even the relatively
low amounts of IL-1 induced by sIL-1RI in the neutropenic mice had
beneficial effects, as only few IL-1 molecules are necessary to achieve
full biological activity (1). We hypothesize that locally released
IL-1
induced by sIL-1RI, which is not neutralized by sIL-1RI in the
tissues, accounts for this effect. However, beneficial effects of
sIL-1RI which are independent on IL-1
release cannot be excluded. To
settle the question whether the effects of sIL-1RI in vivo are
IL-1
-dependent, experiments with sIL-1RI may be performed in IL-1
knock-out mice (22).
Important biological effects of sIL-1RI are also suggested by studies in which sIL-1RI administration was able to decrease inflammatory reactions to intradermal allergens, even when given at the contralateral site (23). Given the potential usage of soluble receptors for treatment of disseminated candidiasis and other inflammatory diseases, a thorough investigation of the in vivo effects of sIL-1RI is warranted. In view of the evidence that the overall effect of soluble cytokine receptors is dependent on the dose, future studies should thoroughly address this issue.
It is presently unknown which mechanisms are responsible for the
effects of sIL-1RI in these models. One hypothesis is that the cleavage
of the extracellular IL-1RI domain unmasks a domain with catalytic
properties which is able to induce release of IL-1
from the cell. An
alternative stimulatory pathway may involve binding of sIL-1RI to IL-1R
accessory protein (IL-1RAcP) through the cell-associated IL-1
,
resulting in cell stimulation (24). Although stimulation of cells
through formation of a sIL-1RI/IL-1/IL-1RAcP complex has not been
reported to date, it is tempting to speculate that this may be a new
regulatory function of sIL-1RI in vivo. Examples of other soluble
cytokine receptors shown to associate with membrane bound subunits to
effect signal transduction are common among members of the IL-6
receptor family and G-CSF receptors (25).
We hypothesized that the cell-associated IL-1
necessary for bridging
of sIL-1RI to IL-1RAcP is stimulated by LPS leaking from the gut.
However, this did not prove to be the case, because sIL-1RI had the
same stimulatory activity in germ-free mice in which no such leakage
occurs (M.G.N., B.J.K., C.A.D., and J.W.M.V., unpublished
results). Therefore, even in the absence of gut flora shedding LPS,
there is constitutive IL-1
production that has access to the blood
compartment within a very short period of time. Alternatively, the
IL-1
may be bound to other plasma proteins and hence "liberated"
by sIL-1RI. Additional experiments are currently performed to elucidate
the mechanisms responsible for these effects of sIL-1RI.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jos W. M. Van der Meer, Department of Medicine (541), University Hospital Nijmegen, P. O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: IL-1Ra, IL-1R antagonist; sIL-1R, soluble IL-1R; IL-1RI, type I IL-1R; IL-1RII, type II IL-1R; IL-1RAcP, IL-1R accessory protein. ![]()
Received for publication May 15, 1998. Accepted for publication January 19, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
administered in a phase I trial to patients with advanced malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol. 10:1141.[Abstract]
and supressed by soluble IL-1 receptor. J. Immunol. 146:2983.[Abstract]
, interleukin 1ß and tumor necrosis factor from human mononuclear cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 19:1531.[Medline]
in the rat by mechanisms other than endotoxemia. Surgery 115:588.[Medline]
, IL-1ß, IL-1
/ß, and IL-1 receptor antagonist shows that IL-1ß is crucial in turpentine-induced fever development and glucocorticoid secretion. J. Exp. Med. 187:1463.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |