The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haziot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Goyert, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haziot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Goyert, S. M.
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 162: 4801-4805.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

CD14 Plays No Major Role in Shock Induced by Staphylococcus aureus but Down-Regulates TNF-{alpha} Production1

Alain Haziot, Naoki Hijiya, Karine Schultz, Fan Zhang, Sophie C. Gangloff and Sanna M. Goyert2

North Shore University Hospital/New York University School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY 11030


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Recent in vitro studies have suggested that CD14, a major receptor for LPS, may also be a receptor for cell wall components of Gram-positive bacteria and thus play a role in Gram-positive shock. To analyze the in vivo role of CD14 in responses to Gram-positive bacteria, CD14-deficient and control mice were injected with Staphylococcus aureus, and the effects on lethality, bacterial clearance, and production of cytokines were analyzed. Survival of CD14-deficient and control mice did not differ significantly after administration of various doses of either unencapsulated or encapsulated S. aureus; furthermore, mice in both groups displayed similar symptoms of shock. In addition, inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-{alpha} and IL-6 were readily detectable in the serum of CD14-deficient mice injected with live or antibiotic-killed S. aureus. Surprisingly, the serum concentration of TNF-{alpha} in CD14-deficient mice was at least threefold higher than in control mice after injection of either unencapsulated or encapsulated S. aureus, suggesting that CD14 down-regulates TNF-{alpha}. A similar increase in serum TNF-{alpha} occurred when CD14-deficient animals were injected with gentamicin-killed bacteria even though no symptoms of shock were observed. These studies indicate that CD14, in contrast to its key function in responses to the Gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli 0111, does not play a prominent role in septic shock induced by S. aureus, and that the symptoms of S. aureus shock are not due solely to TNF-{alpha}.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Asevere bacterial infection caused by either Gram-positive or Gram-negative organisms can lead to hemodynamic shock accompanied by symptoms such as fever, tachycardia, and hyperventilation, and possibly ending in multiorgan failure (1). CD14, a GPI-anchored protein that is highly expressed on the surface of human monocytes and most macrophages (2, 3), is a key mediator of septic shock induced by the Gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli 0111. The symptoms of shock can be reproduced with administration of purified LPS (endotoxin), the major toxic component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria (4, 5, 6). Mice deficient in CD14 show no gross symptoms of shock (weakness, ruffled fur, labored breathing) and are resistant to the lethal effects of both LPS and E. coli 0111 (4). Furthermore, they produce very low amounts of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-{alpha}, IL-6, IL-1) (4) when injected with either LPS or live E. coli. It has been proposed that CD14 may also be an important mediator of septic shock caused by Gram-positive bacteria based on the ability of anti-CD14 mAbs to inhibit the responses of monocytes/macrophages to Gram-positive cell wall components (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). To address the role of CD14 in Gram-positive septic shock, the responses of CD14-deficient mice to Staphylococcus aureus were compared with normal mice by measuring lethality, bacterial clearance, and cytokine production.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

CD14-deficient mice (4) were backcrossed three to six times with C57BL/6J mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) or with BALB/c (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Madison, WI). Age- and sex-matched CD14-deficient and control mice of the same strain (C57BL/6J or BALB/c) were used as indicated in the text. All experiments were Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved and were performed in compliance with the National Institute of Health and the New York State regulations on animal handling and usage.

Bacteria

Ten different isolates of S. aureus (unencapsulated) were obtained from the clinical microbiology laboratory, North Shore Health Systems (a kind gift of Dr. Christine Ginocchio), from infected patients. S. aureus, strain M, was a gift of Dr. C. Y. Lee (University of Kansas), and was previously shown to be a highly virulent encapsulated strain (14). Analysis using india ink staining confirmed that the strain M isolate contained its capsule while all of the other clinical isolates lacked a capsule (data not shown).

Preparation of S. aureus and injections. S. aureus was cultured in tryptic soy broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) to midlogarithmic phase, harvested by centrifugation (2500 x g, 30 min, 4°C), washed twice with pyrogen-free saline (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL), and resuspended in saline. The concentration of bacteria was estimated from the absorbance at 530 nm or by fluorescence (LIVE/DEAD kit; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and confirmed by viable CFU counts on agar plates. Antibiotic-killed bacteria were prepared by incubating the washed bacteria in saline containing 800 µg/ml gentamicin (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) for 2 h at 37°C, followed by two washes in saline and plating on agar plates to confirm the efficiency of the treatment. No viable bacteria were detected in neat samples of gentamicin-treated S. aureus. Mice were injected with bacteria and monitored for their physical signs and death for up to 3 wk.

Determination of the number of bacteria and cytokines in blood and organs. Blood samples and organs were collected and processed as described (4). Bacterial CFU were determined by plating serial 10-fold dilutions on agar. The concentration of TNF-{alpha} in mouse serum was measured by cytotoxicity using WEHI-2F cells, as previously described (15). The concentration of IL-6 in mouse serum was measured by ELISA (Endogen, Boston, MA).

Cell wall preparation

The cell walls of the encapsulated S. aureus strain M were prepared as described by De Jonge et al. (16). Briefly, bacteria were grown in 1 L of tryptic soy broth, chilled, and harvested by centrifugation. The bacteria were boiled for 30 min in a 4% SDS solution in saline. The cells, recovered by centrifugation and washed seven times in water, were mixed with baked, acid-washed glass beads and disrupted by vigorous agitation (15 min vortex and 15 min shaking at 540 rpm/min (G24 shaker; New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ)). After an initial centrifugation (10 min at 2000 x g), the supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 27,500 x g for 30 min and the pellet was resuspended in a 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, solution supplemented with 10 µg/ml DNase I (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 50 µg/ml RNase A (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), and 20 mM MgSO4. The resuspended pellet was then incubated for 90 min at 37°C; CaCl2 (10 mM final concentration) and trypsin (100 µg/ml; EM Laboratories, Elmsford, NY) were added, and the suspension was further incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The enzymes were then inactivated by boiling 15 min in the presence of 1% SDS. This preparation was then washed five times with water, once with 8 M LiCl, once with 100 mM EDTA, twice with water, once with acetone, and six times with water before lyophilization.

Stimulation of peritoneal macrophages

Thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal cells (2 x 106/ml) were incubated for 3 h at 37°C under 5% CO2 in RPMI-HEPES supplemented with 1% autologous serum in 24-well plates. After removal of nonadherent cells, macrophages were incubated for 3 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of cell walls from S. aureus strain M or soluble peptidoglycan from S. aureus (a gift of R. Dziarski Indiana University School of Medicine) in 0.5 ml RPMI-HEPES/1% autologous serum with or without polymyxin B (5 µg/ml; Sigma). The supernatants were then collected and assayed for TNF-{alpha} by ELISA, as described below.

Preparation of spleen cells and stimulation with S. aureus

Spleen cells were washed in RPMI supplemented with HEPES (10 mM) (Life Technologies). Adherent cells were prepared by incubation of washed spleen cells in tissue culture dishes for 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 and removal of nonadherent cells by gently washing the dishes three times with warm RPMI-HEPES. Whole spleen cells and adherent cells were cultured in RPMI-HEPES supplemented with 1% autologous serum. For stimulation, increasing numbers of washed S. aureus were added to 5 x 106 spleen cells, followed 30 min later with the addition of gentamicin (100 µg/ml) and further incubation for 3 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. TNF-{alpha} was measured in cell-free supernatants by ELISA using the mAb TN3 19.12 (17) and a polyclonal goat anti-recombinant murine TNF-{alpha} (gifts of Dr. Schreiber, Washington University, St. Louis, MO).

Statistical analyses

Statistical comparisons were made using the Fisher "exact" test (for survival studies) or the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test (all others).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The role of CD14 in S. aureus-induced shock

Previous studies indicated that cell wall products from Gram-positive bacteria could stimulate the activation of human and murine macrophages via CD14. These observations suggested that, as for E. coli 0111 (4), some of the deleterious effects of Gram-positive infection leading to shock might be CD14 dependent (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). To test this hypothesis, CD14-deficient and control mice were injected with various doses of S. aureus and monitored for lethality. A panel of 11 different isolates of S. aureus was used. These consisted of 10 unencapsulated isolates of S. aureus obtained from infected patients, and one highly virulent encapsulated isolate, strain M (14). Approximately 12 h following the injection of a lethal dose of any of the isolates of S. aureus, both CD14-deficient and control mice showed similar shocklike symptoms, including ruffled hair, eye exudate, and diarrhea. A summary of the survival data for CD14-deficient and control mice injected i.v. with an unencapsulated isolate of S. aureus (isolate 10) at doses ranging from 2.5 x 106 to 1.5 x 107 CFU/gram body weight is shown in Table IGo. There is no increase in survival rate among the CD14-deficient mice compared with the control mice. When the encapsulated isolate of S. aureus, strain M, was similarly tested, there was again no statistically significant difference in survival between CD14-deficient and control mice, although the CD14-deficient mice showed a slight trend toward lower survival. Similar results were obtained when S. aureus was administered i.p. instead of i.v. (data not shown). These results indicate that there is no remarkable difference in the survival of CD14-deficient and normal mice after i.v. or i.p. injection with either encapsulated or unencapsulated S. aureus.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Data on unencapsulated and encapsulated S. aureus

 
Clearance of S. aureus in CD14-deficient and control mice

CD14-deficient mice have previously been shown to more rapidly clear the Gram-negative organism, E. coli 0111, than control mice, resulting in reduced bacterial dissemination (4). Although lack of CD14 has no effect on survival to a lethal S. aureus infection, it might, nevertheless, play a role in the clearance of S. aureus. Accordingly, the number of bacteria in the blood and tissues of CD14-deficient and control mice infected with encapsulated or unencapsulated S. aureus was examined. Mice were injected i.v. with 9 x 106 CFU/g of the unencapsulated isolate of S. aureus (number 10), and the number of bacteria present in blood and organs after 6 h of infection was determined. As shown in Fig. 1Go, CD14-deficient and control mice had very similar numbers of S. aureus in their blood, liver, and spleen. A similar result was obtained with the encapsulated strain of S. aureus (data not shown). These results indicate that, in contrast to the effects observed after infection with E. coli 0111, CD14 does not play a role in the clearance of S. aureus.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Blood and organ counts (CFU) of S. aureus (unencapsulated) in CD14-deficient and control mice. CD14-deficient mice (backcrossed to BALB/c six times) or control BALB/c were injected i.v. with 9 x 106 CFU/g of S. aureus isolate 10 in 0.2 ml nonpyrogenic saline. The blood and the organs were collected 7 h later, and bacterial counts were determined by serial dilution plating on agar. Results are represented as the mean (n = 3) number of CFU in each organ ± SEM.

 
The role of CD14 in the production of cytokines induced by S. aureus

Previous in vitro studies have shown that Abs to CD14 can inhibit the release of inflammatory mediators induced by cell wall components from Gram-positive bacteria (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). To determine whether CD14, despite no effect on survival or bacterial clearance, might nevertheless play a role in the in vivo induction of inflammatory cytokines during infection with a live Gram-positive bacterium, the serum concentrations of TNF-{alpha} and IL-6 were measured in CD14-deficient and control mice after infection with the encapsulated S. aureus strain M or the unencapsulated S. aureus isolate 10 using the C57BL/6 or BALB/c background mice, respectively. In keeping with previous reports (18, 19), the concentration of TNF-{alpha} in the serum of control animals was very low or absent (Fig. 2Go, a and c). Surprisingly, CD14-deficient animals produced substantially more TNF-{alpha} than control mice; animals injected with either encapsulated or unencapsulated S. aureus produced at least three times as much TNF-{alpha} as control animals. In contrast to the results with TNF-{alpha}, IL-6 was only slightly elevated (maximum twofold) in CD14-deficient animals injected with this dose of strain M (Fig. 2Gob) as compared with controls; at lower doses of strain M, there was virtually no difference in IL-6 production (data not shown), indicating that there is no CD14-dependent IL-6 response to S. aureus in vivo. Furthermore, no differences in IL-6 expression were detected in animals injected with the high dose of unencapsulated S. aureus (Fig. 2God).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Production of TNF-{alpha} and IL-6 in CD14-deficient and control mice after infection with S. aureus. CD14-deficient mice (backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice three times) and control C57BL/6 were used in a and b, and CD14-deficient mice (backcrossed to BALB/c six times) and control BALB/c were used in c and d. Mice were injected i.v. with 3 x 108 CFU (approximately 1.5 x 108 CFU/g) of encapsulated S. aureus (strain M) (a and b) or 2.5 x 107 CFU/g of unencapsulated S. aureus isolate 10 (c and d) in 0.2 ml of nonpyrogenic saline. Mice were bled at the indicated times, and TNF-{alpha} (a and c) and IL-6 (b and d) were measured in the serum. Open squares, CD14 deficient; filled circles, controls. Results are represented as the mean (n = 3) ± SEM.

 
The dramatic differences in TNF-{alpha} production by CD14-deficient and control mice in response to S. aureus were consistently observed in multiple experiments. Furthermore, the enhanced TNF-{alpha} production by CD14-deficient mice was also observed in vitro; when spleen cells from CD14-deficient and control mice (C57BL/6) were incubated with live S. aureus (strain M), culture supernatants from cells from CD14-deficient mice showed greater levels of TNF-{alpha} than culture supernatants from cells from control mice (Fig. 3Go). Similar results were obtained after a 6-h incubation or when nonadherent spleen cells were removed before activation (not shown). In contrast, when peritoneal macrophages from CD14-deficient and control mice were exposed to either purified cell walls or peptidoglycan from S. aureus, there was a clear dependence on the presence of CD14 for the production of TNF-{alpha} (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Secretion of TNF-{alpha} by spleen cells in the presence of S. aureus. Spleen cells (5 x 106) from CD14-deficient and control mice were incubated with increasing numbers of S. aureus (strain M). Thirty minutes later, gentamicin (100 µg/ml) was added to the samples; after further incubation (total, 3 h), TNF-{alpha} was measured in the cell-free supernatant by ELISA. The results are representative of three independent experiments, and are shown as the mean of duplicate determinations ± SD; lack of error bars indicates that the error falls within the symbol. *, p < 0.02 (Mann-Whitney test).

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. TNF-{alpha} production by peritoneal macrophages stimulated with cell walls or soluble peptidoglycan (sPGN) from S. aureus. Thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal macrophages from control and CD14-deficient mice (C57BL/6 background) were incubated for 3 h at 37°C with the indicated concentrations of either S. aureus cell walls (a) or sPGN (b) in RPMI-HEPES supplemented with 1% autologous serum. The cell-free supernatants were assayed for TNF-{alpha} by ELISA and plotted as the mean of duplicate determinations ± SD; lack of error bars indicates that the error falls within the symbol. Results are representative of two independent experiments.

 
Antibiotic-treated S. aureus induce TNF-{alpha}, but not septic shock

To examine whether cell wall components of Gram-positive organisms are sufficient to cause shock, CD14-deficient and control mice were injected with gentamicin-killed unencapsulated (isolate 10) S. aureus (Fig. 5Goa) and monitored for cytokine production, symptoms of septic shock, and lethality. Gentamicin is a bactericidal antibiotic that acts by inhibiting protein synthesis without directly altering the bacterial membrane and its components, leaving an intact cell wall and capsule. This preparation differs from cell walls prepared by the classical method particularly in that proteins are not denatured. As can be seen in Fig. 5Goa, CD14-deficient animals again produced substantially more TNF-{alpha} than control animals, yet in neither case were gross symptoms of shock (ruffled fur, labored breathing, eye exudate, diarrhea) or lethality observed, even though the amounts of TNF-{alpha} produced were similar to those in the serum of animals injected with live bacteria. Furthermore, mice injected with the encapsulated S. aureus showed a response similar to those injected with the unencapsulated organism (Fig. 5Gob).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Production of TNF-{alpha} in CD14-deficient and control mice after injection of antibiotic-killed S. aureus. CD14-deficient mice (backcrossed to BALB/c 10 times) and control BALB/c were used in a, and CD14-deficient mice (backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice three times) and control C57BL/6 were used in b. Mice were injected i.v. with 5 x 107 CFU/gram body weight of gentamicin-killed S. aureus isolate 10 (a) or 1 x 109 CFU of gentamicin-killed S. aureus (strain M) (b) in 0.2 ml of nonpyrogenic saline. Mice were bled at the indicated times, and TNF-{alpha} was measured in the serum. Open squares, CD14 deficient; filled circles, controls. Results are represented as the mean (n = 3) ± SEM.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The studies described were designed to analyze the role of CD14 in septic shock induced by the Gram-positive bacterium, S. aureus. Previous studies have shown that CD14 plays a major role in the response to the Gram-negative bacterium, E. coli 0111-B4 (4). Since the symptoms seen in Gram-positive shock are very similar to those seen in Gram-negative shock, it has been proposed that a LPS analogue may reside in the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria that can similarly induce Gram-positive shock (1, 20). Indeed, studies have shown that a combination of lipoteichoic acid and peptidoglycan from S. aureus can induce shock in rats (21). Furthermore, it has been proposed that CD14 serves as the receptor on monocytes/macrophages for mediating this response (7, 8, 9, 10, 11).

To examine whether CD14 might play a role in the in vivo response to Gram-positive bacteria, CD14-deficient and control mice were injected with a lethal dose of S. aureus, and the effects on lethality, bacterial clearance, and cytokine production were determined. Surprisingly, no differences were observed between CD14-deficient and control mice. Similar results were obtained with the two different types of S. aureus utilized in these studies, a highly virulent encapsulated form, strain M, which has a very large polysaccharide capsule (type 1) (14), and the more common unencapsulated strain of S. aureus, which is sensitive to phagocytosis. The inability to demonstrate any differences in the gross symptoms of septic shock or death rate in CD14-deficient and control mice is quite distinct from what was observed with the Gram-negative organism, E. coli 0111; there, CD14-deficient mice showed no symptoms of shock or death when exposed to a lethal dose of E. coli 0111.

In addition to the lack of a clear difference in symptoms and death between CD14-deficient and control mice, there was no indication of reduced cytokine production by CD14-deficient mice; in fact, CD14-deficient mice produced more TNF-{alpha} than control mice when exposed to live S. aureus (Fig. 2Go). This induction of TNF-{alpha} could be reproduced by gentamicin-killed organisms (Fig. 5Go), suggesting that cell wall components may be responsible for this response. However, the presence of a capsule (strain M), which has been shown to inhibit some cell wall-mediated events (22, 23, 24), did not influence TNF-{alpha} production, suggesting that the bacterial component inducing TNF-{alpha} may not be masked by the capsule. Alternatively, the TNF-{alpha}-inducing component may be a non-cell wall component that does not require new protein synthesis.

Although TNF-{alpha} is produced, its induction is not sufficient to produce death or symptoms of shock; mice exposed to gentamicin-treated bacteria produce a similar amount of TNF-{alpha} as those exposed to live S. aureus, and yet no death or symptoms of shock were observed. The inability to observe differences in TNF-{alpha} production in response to either live or antibiotic-killed S. aureus brings into question the physiologic relevance of in vitro studies that examine the induction of TNF-{alpha} by Gram-positive cell walls or products.

The lack of a deleterious role for TNF-{alpha} in the septic shock response to Gram-positive organisms may not be surprising in view of the observation that the introduction of anti-TNF Ab into mice after infection by live S. aureus actually increases the death rate (19). Based on these studies, the authors have proposed that low levels of TNF-{alpha} may actually be protective against Gram-positive infections. Indeed, it should be noted that the total amount of circulating TNF-{alpha} produced by control or CD14-deficient mice after infection with S. aureus is 7 to 18 times lower than the amount produced after infection with E. coli 0111 (Fig. 2Goa) (4), in which TNF-{alpha} presumably has a deleterious effect (25). Whether the protective effects referenced above are due to such reduced levels of TNF-{alpha} remain to be determined. Similarly, the observation by others that heat-killed S. aureus can kill mice (26) does not contradict our data in which we fail to observe death with gentamicin-killed S. aureus, since the former experiments were performed after sensitization with D-galactosamine, an agent that makes mice hypersensitive to even very small amounts of TNF-{alpha}.

The ability of CD14-deficient mice to produce TNF-{alpha} in response to live or gentamicin-killed organisms is quite surprising in view of the proposed role for CD14 in cytokine induction by Gram-positive cell wall products. It indicates the presence of a non-CD14 receptor that can respond to Gram-positive components. This receptor is present on splenic macrophages since such cells from CD14-deficient mice produce large quantities of TNF-{alpha} in response to S. aureus (Fig. 3Go). A similar CD14 independence was seen in the in vitro response of human monocytes to heat-killed unencapsulated pneumococcus (12).

The increased expression of TNF-{alpha} in CD14-deficient mice is also surprising, and suggests a role for CD14 in down-regulating TNF-{alpha} responses to Gram-positive organisms. Presumably, a cell wall component of Gram-positive organisms that is not masked by a capsule is responsible for this down-regulation, since gentamicin-killed unencapsulated or encapsulated bacteria show the same effect. Whether this Gram-positive component is one of the so far proposed ligands of CD14 (10, 27) or an unrelated component of the bacterium remains to be determined. Such a mechanism of negative signaling has recently been described with receptors such as Fc{gamma}RII and CD22 (28, 29, 30), and requires phosphorylation by the protein-tyrosine kinase Lyn (31). Although the molecular mechanisms used by CD14, a GPI-anchored glycoprotein (3), to transmit signals into the cell are still unknown, it is intriguing to note that CD14 has also been shown to coprecipitate with Lyn (32); however, the molecular mechanisms regulating the generation of a negative signal by CD14 or an associated signaling molecule remain to be determined.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AI23859, Council for Tobacco Research Grant 2218 (to S.M.G.), and the American Heart Association New York State Affiliate Grant-In-Aid 960159 (to A.H.). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Sanna M. Goyert, Division of Molecular Medicine, North Shore University Hospital/NYU School of Medicine, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030. E-mail address: Back

Received for publication August 26, 1998. Accepted for publication January 19, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bone, R. C.. 1991. The pathogenesis of sepsis. Ann. Intern. Med. 115:457.
  2. Goyert, S. M., E. Ferrero, W. J. Rettig, A. K. Yenamandra, F. Obata, M. M. Le Beau. 1988. The CD14 monocyte differentiation antigen maps to a region encoding growth factors and receptors. Science 239:497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Haziot, A., S. Chen, E. Ferrero, M. G. Low, R. Silber, S. M. Goyert. 1988. The monocyte differentiation antigen, CD14, is anchored to the cell membrane by a phosphatidylinositol linkage. J. Immunol. 141:547.[Abstract]
  4. Haziot, A., E. Ferrero, F. Koentgen, N. Hijiya, S. Yamamoto, J. Silver, C. L. Stewart, S. M. Goyert. 1996. Resistance to endotoxin shock and reduced dissemination of Gram-negative bacteria in CD14-deficient mice. Immunity 4:407.[Medline]
  5. Morrison, D. C., J. L. Ryan. 1987. Endotoxins and disease mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Med. 38:417.[Medline]
  6. Rietschel, E. T., H. Wagner. 1996. Bacterial endotoxin: chemical constitution, biological recognition, host response, and immunological detoxification. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 216:39.[Medline]
  7. Pugin, J., I. D. Heumann, A. Tomasz, V. V. Kravchenko, Y. Akamatsu, M. Ishijima, M. P. Glauser, P. S. Tobias, R. J. Ulevitch. 1994. CD14 is a pattern recognition receptor. Immunity 1:509.[Medline]
  8. Weidemann, B., H. Brade, E. T. Rietschel, R. Dziarski, V. Bazil, S. Kusumoto, H.-D. Flad, A. J. Ulmer. 1994. Soluble peptidoglycan-induced monokine production can be blocked by anti-CD14 monoclonal antibodies and by lipid A partial structures. Infect. Immun. 62:4709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gupta, D., T. N. Kirkland, S. Viryiyakosol, R. Dziarski. 1996. CD14 is a cell-activating receptor for bacterial peptidoglycan. J. Biol. Chem. 271:23310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kusunoki, T., E. Hailman, T. Juan, H. Lichenstein, S. Wright. 1995. Molecules from Staphylococcus aureus that bind CD14 and stimulate innate immune responses. J. Exp. Med. 182:1673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cleveland, M. G., J. D. Gorham, T. L. Murphy, E. Tuomanen, K. M. Murphy. 1996. Lipoteichoic acid preparations of Gram-positive bacteria induce interleukin-12 through a CD14-dependent pathway. Infect. Immun. 64:1906.[Abstract]
  12. Cauwels, A., E. Wan, M. Leismann, E. Tuomanen. 1997. Coexistence of CD14-dependent and independent pathways for stimulation of human monocytes by Gram-positive bacteria. Infect. Immun. 65:3255.[Abstract]
  13. Medvedev, A. E., T. Flo, R. R. Ingalls, D. T. Golenbock, G. Teti, S. N. Vogel, T. Espevik. 1998. Involvement of CD14 and complement receptors CR3 and CR4 in nuclear factor-{kappa}B activation and TNF{alpha} production induced by lipopolysaccharide and group B streptococcal cell walls. J. Immunol. 160:4535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Melly, M. A., L. J. Duke, D.-F. Liau, J. H. Hash. 1974. Biological properties of the encapsulated Staphylococcus aureus M. Infect. Immun. 10:389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Haziot, A., B. Tsuberi, S. M. Goyert. 1993. Neutrophil CD14: biochemical properties and role in the secretion of TNF{alpha} in response to LPS. J. Immunol. 150:5556.[Abstract]
  16. De Jonge, B. L. M., Y.-S. Chang, D. Gage, A. Tomasz. 1992. Peptidoglycan composition of a highly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain: the role of penicillin binding protein 2A. J. Biol. Chem. 267:11248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sheehan, K. C., N. H. Ruddle, R. D. Schreiber. 1989. Generation and characterization of hamster monoclonal antibodies that neutralize murine tumor necrosis factors. J. Immunol. 142:3884.[Abstract]
  18. Rozalska, B., T. Wadstrom. 1993. Interferon-{gamma}, interleukin-1 and tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} synthesis during experimental murine staphylococcal infection. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 7:145.[Medline]
  19. Nakane, A., M. Okamoto, M. Asano, M. Kohanawa, T. Minagawa. 1995. Endogenous {gamma} interferon, tumor necrosis factor, and interleukin-6 in Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 63:1165.[Abstract]
  20. Bone, R. C.. 1993. How Gram-positive organisms cause sepsis. J. Crit. Care 8:51.[Medline]
  21. De Kimpe, S. J., M. Kengatharan, C. Thiemermann, J. R. Vane. 1995. The cell wall components peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid from Staphylococcus aureus act in synergy to cause shock and multiple organ failure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:10359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gillaspy, A. F., C. Y. Lee, S. Sau, A. L. Cheung, M. S. Smeltzer. 1998. Factors affecting the collagen binding capacity of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 66:3170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wilkinson, B. J., K. M. Holmes. 1979. Staphylococcus aureus cell surface: capsule as a barrier to bacteriophage adsorption. Infect. Immun. 23:549.
  24. Wilkinson, B. J., S. P. Sisson, Y. Kim, P. K. Peterson. 1979. Localization of the third component of complement on the cell wall of encapsulated Staphylococcus aureus M: implications for the mechanism of resistance to phagocytosis. Infect. Immun. 26:1159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Beutler, B., A. Cerami. 1986. Cachectin and tumor necrosis factor as two sides of the same biological coin. Nature 320:584.[Medline]
  26. Freudenberg, M. A., C. Galanos. 1991. Tumor necrosis factor {alpha} mediates lethal activity of killed Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in D-galactosamine-treated mice. Infect. Immun. 59:2110.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Weidemann, B., J. Schletter, R. Dziarski, S. Kusumoto, F. Stelter, E. T. Rietschel, H. D. Flad, A. J. Ulmer. 1997. Specific binding of soluble peptidoglycan and muramyldipeptide to CD14 on human monocytes. Infect. Immun. 65:858.[Abstract]
  28. Takai, T., M. Ono, M. Hikida, H. Ohmori, J. V. Ravetch. 1996. Augmented humoral and anaphylactic responses in Fc-{gamma}RII-deficient mice. Nature 379:346.[Medline]
  29. Sato, S., A. S. Miller, M. Inaoki, C. B. Bock, P. J. Jansen, M. L. Tang, T. F. Tedder. 1996. CD22 is both a positive and negative regulator of B lymphocyte antigen receptor signal transduction: altered signaling in CD22-deficient mice. Immunity 5:551.[Medline]
  30. O’Keefe, T., G. T. Williams, S. L. Davies, M. S. Neuberger. 1996. Hyperresponsive B cells in CD22-deficient mice. Science 274:798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Nishizumi, H., K. Horikawa, I. Mlinaric-Rascan, T. Yamamoto. 1998. A double-edged kinase Lyn: a positive and negative regulator for antigen receptor-mediated signals. J. Exp. Med. 187:1343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Stefanova, I., M. Corcoran, E. Horak, L. Wahl, J. Bolen, I. Horak. 1993. Lipopolysaccharide induces activation of CD14-associated protein tyrosine kinase p53/56 Lyn. J. Biol. Chem. 268:20725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Leendertse, R. J. L. Willems, I. A. J. Giebelen, P. S. van den Pangaart, W. J. Wiersinga, A. F. de Vos, S. Florquin, M. J. M. Bonten, and T. van der Poll
TLR2-Dependent MyD88 Signaling Contributes to Early Host Defense in Murine Enterococcus faecium Peritonitis
J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4865 - 4874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. C. Dessing, S. Knapp, S. Florquin, A. F. de Vos, and T. van der Poll
CD14 Facilitates Invasive Respiratory Tract Infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2007; 175(6): 604 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
H. Echchannaoui, K. Frei, M. Letiembre, R. M. Strieter, Y. Adachi, and R. Landmann
CD14 deficiency leads to increased MIP-2 production, CXCR2 expression, neutrophil transmigration, and early death in pneumococcal infection
J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 78(3): 705 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
B. Fournier and D. J. Philpott
Recognition of Staphylococcus aureus by the Innate Immune System
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2005; 18(3): 521 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Knuefermann, Y. Sakata, J. S. Baker, C.-H. Huang, K. Sekiguchi, H. S. Hardarson, O. Takeuchi, S. Akira, and J. G. Vallejo
Toll-Like Receptor 2 Mediates Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction and Cytokine Production in the Heart
Circulation, December 14, 2004; 110(24): 3693 - 3698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
H. Tsujimoto, S. Ono, S. Hiraki, T. Majima, N. Kawarabayashi, H. Sugasawa, M. Kinoshita, H. Hiraide, and H. Mochizuki
Hemoperfusion with polymyxin B-immobilized fibers reduced the number of CD16+CD14 + monocytes in patients with septic shock
Innate Immunity, August 1, 2004; 10(4): 229 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
E. S. Van Amersfoort, T. J. C. Van Berkel, and J. Kuiper
Receptors, Mediators, and Mechanisms Involved in Bacterial Sepsis and Septic Shock
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2003; 16(3): 379 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
J.-W. Lee, M. J. Paape, T. H. Elsasser, and X. Zhao
Recombinant Soluble CD14 Reduces Severity of Intramammary Infection by Escherichia coli
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2003; 71(7): 4034 - 4039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
G. L. Su, S. M. Goyert, M.-H. Fan, A. Aminlari, K. Q. Gong, R. D. Klein, A. Myc, W. H. Alarcon, L. Steinstraesser, D. G. Remick, et al.
Activation of human and mouse Kupffer cells by lipopolysaccharide is mediated by CD14
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): G640 - G645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. O. Neilsen, G. A. Zimmerman, and T. M. McIntyre
Escherichia coli Braun Lipoprotein Induces a Lipopolysaccharide-Like Endotoxic Response from Primary Human Endothelial Cells
J. Immunol., November 1, 2001; 167(9): 5231 - 5239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
L. Rabehi, T. Irinopoulou, B. Cholley, N. Haeffner-Cavaillon, and M.-P. Carreno
Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria Do Not Trigger Monocytic Cytokine Production through Similar Intracellular Pathways
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2001; 69(7): 4590 - 4599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
P. F. Jorgensen, J. E. Wang, M. Almlof, C. Thiemermann, S. J. Foster, R. Solberg, and A. O. Aasen
Peptidoglycan and Lipoteichoic Acid Modify Monocyte Phenotype in Human Whole Blood
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., May 1, 2001; 8(3): 515 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
S. J. Ebong, S. M. Goyert, J. A. Nemzek, J. Kim, G. L. Bolgos, and D. G. Remick
Critical Role of CD14 for Production of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Cytokine Inhibitors during Sepsis with Failure To Alter Morbidity or Mortality
Infect. Immun., April 1, 2001; 69(4): 2099 - 2106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Yin, B. U. Bradford, M. D. Wheeler, T. Uesugi, M. Froh, S. M. Goyert, and R. G. Thurman
Reduced Early Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury in CD14-Deficient Mice
J. Immunol., April 1, 2001; 166(7): 4737 - 4742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Verbon, P. E. P. Dekkers, T. ten Hove, C. E. Hack, J. P. Pribble, T. Turner, S. Souza, T. Axtelle, F. J. Hoek, S. J. H. van Deventer, et al.
IC14, an Anti-CD14 Antibody, Inhibits Endotoxin-Mediated Symptoms and Inflammatory Responses in Humans
J. Immunol., March 1, 2001; 166(5): 3599 - 3605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
R. Dziarski and D. Gupta
Role of MD-2 in TLR2- and TLR4-mediated recognition of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and activation of chemokine genes
Innate Immunity, October 1, 2000; 6(5): 401 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Miettinen, A. Lehtonen, I. Julkunen, and S. Matikainen
Lactobacilli and Streptococci Activate NF-{kappa}B and STAT Signaling Pathways in Human Macrophages
J. Immunol., April 1, 2000; 164(7): 3733 - 3740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haziot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Goyert, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haziot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Goyert, S. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS