| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Human C3 exhibits genetic polymorphism (11). C3 slow (C3S) and C3 fast (C3F) are two common allotypes with different electrophoretic mobilities. At the DNA level, this is the result of a single base change (C to G) (12), which can be detected using the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS),3 a modification of the PCR capable of detecting single base differences in the DNA region of interest (13). Another polymorphism of C3, closely linked to the F/S polymorphism, is based on the reactivity of C3 with the mouse monoclonal HAV 4-1 Ab (mAb HAV 4-1) (14). Ninety-eight percent of C3S alleles are HAV 4-1 -ve, while 90% of C3F alleles are HAV 4-1-positive (14).
The occurrence of two C3 allotypes, one of which can be detected by a mAb, affords a unique opportunity for the study of locally secreted C3 by using the conversion of C3 protein from recipient to donor allotype following organ transplantation mismatched at the C3 F/S locus. Naughton et al. (15) reported a donor-derived C3 contribution of 0.2–5.2% to the total circulating C3 in the immediate posttransplant period in six informative bone marrow transplant recipients (FS marrow into SS patient). Monocytes were demonstrated to be the source of the C3 in this study. In four informative liver transplant recipients (SS liver into FS patient), total extrahepatic C3 contributed to between 5.6–11.4% of the circulating C3 pool. It was thus apparent that there was an unaccounted source of circulating C3 in this study.
Various cell types of the kidney are capable of producing C3 in vitro (16, 17, 18). In vivo, immunological injury as a result of interstitial nephritis, immune complex glomerulonephritis, and allograft rejection up-regulates local C3 gene expression (16, 19, 20, 21), indicating that locally synthesized C3 may be an important mediator of inflammatory and immunological injury within the kidney. Interpretation of these findings, however, is limited by the lack of data on the actual amount of complement that the kidney is capable of producing in normal and inflamed states. To date, the overall contribution of renal C3 production to the total circulating C3 level under physiologic and pathologic conditions is unknown.
The aim of the present study was to quantify the renal contribution of C3 to the systemic pool by measuring the extent of allotype conversion following renal transplantation in recipients who had informative mismatches at the C3 F/S locus. The change in the renal contribution of C3 to the circulating pool and its functional relevance during periods of allograft dysfunction are also considered.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Ethical approval was granted by the local research ethics committee. Determination of the C3 allotype by ARMS was conducted on 80 consecutive renal donor-recipient pairs (148 individuals) who underwent renal transplantation from September 1996 to August 1997 at the Department of Nephrology and Transplantation of Guy’s Hospital for end-stage renal failure. Informative subjects, defined as C3 SS homozygous recipients of C3 FS heterozygous or C3 FF homozygous kidneys, were followed posttransplant with regular serum sampling. All serum samples were stored in aliquots at -70°C before analysis.
Preparation of donor and recipient DNA
Genomic DNA was extracted at tissue typing using the salt method (22) from peripheral blood leukocytes. Genomic DNA was stored at -20°C until further use.
ARMS analysis for determination of C3 allotypes
To determine C3 allotype, ARMS analysis was conducted using a modified version of a previously described method (23). Oligonucleotide primers (30 mer) comprised two forward primers, one for each polymorphism, with the 3' base complementary to one or the other allovariable allele, and a reverse primer located upstream of the allovariable site giving a predicted product size of approximately 300 bp for the C3 F/S polymorphism. Primer sequences were 5'-CCAACAGGGAGTTCAAGTCAGAAAAGGTGC-3' for C3S, 5'-CCAACAGGGAGTTCAAGTCAGAAAAGGTGG-3' for C3F, and 5'-TGTTGACCATGACCGTCCGGCCCACGGGTA-3' for the common primer. Paired PCR reactions were performed with both tubes containing the common primer. One tube of each pair contained the C3F primer, while the other contained the C3S primer. The PCR reactions were performed on a Perkin-Elmer DNA Thermal Cycler (Perkin-Elmer, Beaconsfield, U.K.) in a total volume of 25 µl containing approximately 0.2 µg of genomic DNA, 0.4 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (Boehringer Mannheim, Lewes, U.K.), 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 50 mM potassium chloride, 0.1% Triton X-100, 3 mM magnesium chloride, 1 µM of each primer, and 0.3 µl of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI). PCR reaction conditions were 33 cycles, with denaturing at 94°C for 30 s, and a combined annealing and extension step at 73°C for 60 s, followed by a 10-min extension step at 72°C at the end of the 33 cycles. The amplified DNA was visualized after electrophoresis in 1.4% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide and compared with controls of known C3 F/S allotype.
ELISA for quantification of HAV 4-1-positive serum C3
Baseline C3 HAV 4-1 concentrations were assayed on serum samples obtained at 2 wk after the attainment of a stable graft function posttransplant as reflected by serum creatinine levels. Thereafter, C3 HAV 4-1 concentrations were assayed at times of graft dysfunction as reflected by a rise in serum creatinine that necessitated a graft biopsy. The assay for C3 HAV 4-1 was based on that described by Naughton et al. (15). Nunc MaxiSorp immunoplates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 100 µl of rabbit anti-mouse Ig (Dako, High Wycombe, U.K.) diluted 1/200 in PBS per well and incubated overnight at 4°C. The plates were washed twice with PBS/0.075% Tween and twice with PBS, blocked with PBS/2% BSA for 1 h at 37°C. The mAb HAV 4-1 was added at a concentration of 3.0 µg/ml in sample buffer (PBS, 2% BSA, and 0.05% Tween) and incubated for 1 h at 37°C, then washed. Serum samples, diluted 1/500 to 1/1000 in sample buffer, were then added in duplicate and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The plates were sequentially incubated with sheep anti-human C3c (The Binding Site, Birmingham, U.K.) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-sheep IgG (Dako) diluted 1/10,000 and 1/5,000, respectively. The enzyme activity was assessed after incubation with o-phenylenediamine by measuring absorbance at 490 nm (MRX 1.1, Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA). C3 HAV 4-1 homozygous-positive serum of known C3 concentration (as determined in the total C3 ELISA described below) was added in duplicate to generate a standard curve and was included in every reaction. The limit of sensitivity of this assay was 0.4% C3 HAV 4-1-positive in C3 HAV 4-1 -ve serum.
ELISA for quantification of total serum C3
Total serum C3 concentrations were measured by ELISA. Nunc MaxiSorp immunoplates were coated overnight at 4°C with 100 µl of sheep anti-human C3c (The Binding Site) diluted 1/200 in PBS. After washing, they were blocked as described. Serum samples, diluted 1/200,000 in sample buffer, were added in duplicate. Rabbit anti-human C3c (Dako) diluted 1/3,000 in sample buffer was then applied followed, after incubation at 37°C for 1 h, by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Dako) diluted 1/5,000. The enzyme activity was read as described above. A pooled normal human serum of known C3 concentrations was used to generate a standard curve and was included in every reaction. The limit of sensitivity of this assay was 0.6 ng/ml.
Protein electrophoresis and immunoblotting
Serum samples were subjected to high voltage agarose gel electrophoresis according to a previously described method (24). Briefly, 5 µl of serum was applied to a 1% agarose gel and run in barbitone buffer (pH 8.6) at 5°C for 4.5 h at 250 V. At the end of the electrophoresis, the gel was blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond-C Super, Amersham, Little Chalfont, U.K.) and incubated at room temperature for 2 h with mAb HAV 4-1 at a concentration of 200 ng/ml in PBS, 0.05% Tween, and 10% milk powder. After washing in PBS and 0.05% Tween, the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (Dako) diluted 1/5000. After a final wash, the membrane was developed with diaminobenzidine (FAST DAB tablet set, Sigma, Poole, U.K.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to visualize binding of the HAV 4-1 Ab.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Contrary to previously reported protocols (23) that used
relatively high concentrations of magnesium chloride (6.7 mM) and
deoxynucleotide triphosphates (1.25 mM) in the PCR reaction, we found
the optimal concentrations of MgCl2 and dNTPs to be 3.0 and
0.4 mM, respectively (Fig. 1
).
Optimization of the reaction conditions will influence product yield
and accuracy of amplification (25). In addition, as little as 200 ng,
instead of 1 µg, of genomic DNA was sufficient for satisfactory
amplification.
|
Twenty-one potentially informative C3 SS recipients were identified on ARMS analysis. Their demographic data and causes of end-stage renal failure are listed in Tables I and II, respectively. Among the 80 donor-recipient pairs, the gene frequency of C3F and C3S was 54 of 296 (18.2%) and 242 of 296 (81.8%), respectively. Two subjects received kidneys from C3 FF homozygous donors, while 19 received kidneys from C3 FS heterozygotes. None of the patients were receiving immunosuppressive treatment before transplantation, nor had any patient been transplanted within the previous 3 yr. All patients received triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisolone as induction and subsequent maintenance immunosuppression. Two patients were subsequently switched to a tacrolimus-based regimen because of recurrent rejection. One patient developed acute graft thrombosis at 1 mo and had a graft nephrectomy. One patient died of central nervous system lymphoma 8 mo after the transplant. The other 19 patients remain well with functioning grafts. There was no graft loss as a direct consequence of rejection.
Detection of C3 HAV 4-1 in the early posttransplant period
Total C3 and HAV 4-1-positive C3 were measured in parallel by
double ligand ELISA on every serum sample. The total C3 levels of the
21 subjects ranged from 78–102 mg/dl (mean, 93.8) and were similar to
those in healthy subjects (range, 80–120 mg/dl; mean, 96.6). The level
of C3 HAV 4-1 as a marker of donor-derived C3F in the posttransplant
serum was expressed as a percentage of the total C3. At baseline (2 wk
after attaining a stable plasma creatinine level), only two patients
had detectable levels of C3 HAV 4-1 in their serum, which contributed
to 0.7 and 1% of the total circulating C3. Both of these patients had
received kidneys from donors who were C3 FF homozygotes, while the
remaining 19 patients with undetectable C3 HAV 4-1 in their baseline
posttransplant serum had all received C3 FS heterozygous grafts (Fig. 2).
|
. At times of acute cellular rejection, C3
HAV 4-1 contributed to between 1.5–8% (mean, 4.8%) of the total
circulating C3. As all donors in this group were C3 FS heterozygotes,
it follows that the transplant kidney contributed to between 3–16%
(mean, 9.6%) of the total circulating C3 during this time, assuming
the same degree of expression with each C3 allele. Four patients had
acute tubular necrosis (ATN), of which only one had detectable C3 HAV
4-1 during this event. This patient was one of the two who had received
a C3 FF homozygous kidney, and the level of C3 HAV 4-1 detected during
ATN was 1% of the total circulating C3, which was no different from
his baseline value. There were two episodes each of urinary tract
infection and systemic CMV disease, and one each of cyclosporin
toxicity and transplant renal artery occlusion, all associated with a
significant rise in serum creatinine. None of these episodes resulted
in detectable C3 HAV 4-1 in the corresponding serum samples (Fig. 2
).
|
To evaluate the graft’s ability to synthesize C3 in the steady
state, C3 HAV 4-1 was assayed again in 19 of these subjects, 3–13 mo
after transplantation (median, 9 mo) when they had stable graft
function with serum creatinine <2.0 mg/dl (180 µmol/l). At this
stage, C3 HAV 4-1 was detected in 17 subjects and ranged between 1–5%
of the total circulating C3 (Fig. 3). The
overall mean (±SD) for the 19 patients was 2.46 ± 1.71%.
Correcting for the fact that two patients had received C3 FF kidneys
and the rest received C3 FS kidneys, it can be calculated that the
donor kidney contributed to an average of 4.5% of the total
circulating C3. There was no correlation with the level in the early
phase, the number of previous rejection episodes, or serum creatinine.
Because acute rejection led to a distinct elevation of donor-derived
C3, subjects were segregated into two groups according to whether they
had rejected. In the rejecting group, there was heightened renal C3
production during the acute episode followed by a decline to the steady
state level. In the nonrejecting group, C3 HAV 4-1 was detectable only
during the stable phase, at levels comparable to those in the rejecting
group at that stage (Fig. 4).
|
|
Complement was separated from other serum proteins by subjecting
serum samples to prolonged high voltage agarose gel electrophoresis,
followed by protein transfer onto a nitrocellulose membrane, which was
then incubated with mAb HAV 4-1 for detection of C3 HAV 4-1 protein.
Known C3 FF and C3 SS sera were included simultaneously in each run as
positive and negative controls, respectively. Detection of C3 HAV 4-1
correlated with its levels on ELISA. In the early postoperative phase,
C3 HAV 4-1 was demonstrated in 11 of the 12 rejecting serum samples
with C3 HAV 4-1 levels >1.5% of the total C3, whereas those remaining
serum with C3 HAV 4-1 levels <1.5% total C3 were negative.
Immunoblotting of the stable (posttransplant) serum showed a similar
correlation with ELISA results (Fig. 5).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
As the HAV 4-1 C3 allotype could represent a novel epitope for the HAV 4-1-negative recipients, it is possible that some or all of these recipients could have developed Abs against C3 HAV 4-1. The fact that C3 HAV 4-1 persisted in the serum of 19 subjects for at least 3–13 mo (median, 9 mo) may provide evidence against the relevance of anti-C3 HAV 4-1 Ab in this context. Moreover, the circulating levels of C3 HAV 4-1 increased with time, which suggests that if Abs against the novel epitope were present, they did not substantially alter the detection of C3 HAV 4-1 in the recipient serum. It is possible that the presence of Ab against the HAV 4-1 epitope could interfere with the assay for C3 HAV 4-1; however, this would tend to underestimate the level of C3 HAV 4-1 detected, as it would compete for the same epitope as the plated Ab in the ELISA assay.
We have previously demonstrated transcription of C3 mRNA of donor origin in renal cortical biopsies taken during transient allograft dysfunction, and that the predominant site of C3 protein produced within the graft kidney was the tubular epithelial cell (21), as supported by allotype-specific staining of sections of renal cortex (21). However, it was unclear whether this locally synthesized C3 protein ever reached the systemic circulation to a detectable level and, if so, to what extent? The present study indicated that the donor kidney contributed to between 2–16% of the total circulating C3 during rejection episodes. This significant degree of spill-over of renal secreted C3 into the systemic pool suggests that locally synthesized C3 may reach high concentrations in the kidney during rejection. This implies that C3 may have a pathogenic role in renal inflammation. This is further supported by the absence of this spill-over in nonimmunological events such as ATN, drug toxicity, or ischemic injury and also by the association of donor C3F with poor functional outcome of the transplanted kidney (26).
Our findings of heightened renal C3 synthesis during rejection is in
keeping with our unpublished observation in a rat model of MHC class
I/II mismatched renal transplantation, which showed up-regulation of
IL-2 and IFN-
followed by C3 mRNA expression during acute rejection
(J. R. Pratt, M. Miyazaki, and S. H. Sacks, unpublished
observation). This together with our present findings are entirely
consistent with in vitro evidence of local regulation of C3
biosynthesis by cytokines in human proximal tubular epithelial cells
(17). Moreover, inhibition of complement in the rat model significantly
reduced tubulointerstitial inflammatory injury and lengthened graft
survival (27).
C3 has been shown to enhance the Ag-dependent activation of both T and B cells (1). It is possible therefore that local C3 synthesis potentiates both cellular and humoral immunity leading to acute graft rejection. Local C3 synthesis may contribute to other complement-dependent processes, including the mediation of ischemia reperfusion injury (28), immune-mediated tissue injury (29), and the solubilization and clearance of immune complexes deposited in the kidney (30). However, the exact functional role of local C3 synthesis during such immunological events as allograft rejection has yet to be defined.
Circulating donor-specific complement has not previously been demonstrated beyond 3 mo after renal or bone marrow transplantation (15, 21). Our findings here indicate that the kidney is able to produce a significant amount of C3 under normal conditions. Three to thirteen months after transplantation, the graft kidney contributed to 4.5% of the circulating C3 pool regardless of the rejection status in the early postoperative period, suggesting that the kidney has a genuine function of C3 synthesis, akin to the observation of delayed erythropoietin production after renal transplantation. Although cells of myeloid origin (3, 4, 5, 7), vascular endothelial cells (18), the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract (31, 32), and the kidneys (16, 18, 21) have all been cited to be candidate sources of extrahepatic C3, it is apparent from this study that the kidney is responsible for a major portion of the "missing" pool of extrahepatic C3.
Other potential sources of donor-derived C3 in addition to the tubular epithelial cell need to be considered. A previous kidney transplant is one possibility. Two patients in this series were receiving second grafts at 7 and 18 yr after the first graft. The fact that the first grafts were nonfunctional and that donor C3 was detected in patients receiving their first graft makes them unlikely to be a viable source of C3 synthesis. Dendritic cells or passenger leukocytes from the donor marrow and transferred with the donor kidney (33) are another possibility. However, this is not supported by in situ hybridization studies, which demonstrated the absence of C3 mRNA expression by macrophage-like cells within human renal biopsies, even when they were in abundance in the interstitium (34). Furthermore, the expression of donor C3 mRNA up to 2 mo after transplantation (21) argues against dendritic cell chimerism, as these cells become undetectable immunohistologically in the graft 21 days after transplantation (35). Finally, monocytes derived from blood transfusions may theoretically populate the recipient and produce C3. This is refuted by the virtual disappearance of donor monocytic C3 secretion by 6 wk following bone marrow transplantation (15) and the presence of donor-derived C3 in the recovery phase in eight of our patients who had never been transfused. The observation that donor C3 from transfused blood product would only persist in the recipient for up to 48 h after transfusion (15) is a further argument against C3 synthesis by persistence of transfused monocytes.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the kidney contributes in a much more significant and sustained manner to the systemic C3 pool than was previously thought. There is increasing indication that the tubular epithelium is the main site of renal C3 production. We have also presented evidence of heightened C3 biosynthesis alongside C3 mRNA transcription during acute allograft rejection (21), indicating a possible pathogenic role for local C3 synthesis in the inflamed kidney. Once again, the potential implications of local complement synthesis for strategies directed against intrarenal immune-mediated and inflammatory tissue injury cannot be overemphasized.
|
|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. S. H. Sacks, Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, 5th Floor, Thomas Guy House, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom SE1 9RT. E-mail address:
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: ARMS, amplification refractory mutation system; ATN, acute tubular necrosis.
Received for publication September 10, 1998. Accepted for publication January 6, 1999.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Varagunam, M. M. Yaqoob, B. Dohler, and G. Opelz C3 Polymorphisms and Allograft Outcome in Renal Transplantation N. Engl. J. Med., February 26, 2009; 360(9): 874 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Sacks and W. Zhou New Boundaries for Complement in Renal Disease J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2008; 19(10): 1865 - 1869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Zheng, X. Zhang, B. Feng, H. Sun, M. Suzuki, T. Ichim, N. Kubo, A. Wong, L. R. Min, M. E. Budohn, et al. Gene Silencing of Complement C5a Receptor Using siRNA for Preventing Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2008; 173(4): 973 - 980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. S. Sheerin, P. Risley, K. Abe, Z. Tang, W. Wong, T. Lin, and S. H. Sacks Synthesis of complement protein C3 in the kidney is an important mediator of local tissue injury FASEB J, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 1065 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Bao, Y. Wang, A. Chang, A. W. Minto, J. Zhou, H. Kang, M. Haas, and R. J. Quigg Unrestricted C3 Activation Occurs in Crry-Deficient Kidneys and Rapidly Leads to Chronic Renal Failure J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 811 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Dragun Complement-ary matching: a definite maybe Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3371 - 3373. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Brown, E. Kondeatis, R. W. Vaughan, S. P. Kon, C. K.T. Farmer, J. D. Taylor, X. He, A. Johnston, C. Horsfield, B. J.C. Janssen, et al. Influence of donor C3 allotype on late renal-transplantation outcome. N. Engl. J. Med., May 11, 2006; 354(19): 2014 - 2023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. S. Sheerin, K. Abe, P. Risley, and S. H. Sacks Accumulation of Immune Complexes in Glomerular Disease Is Independent of Locally Synthesized C3 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2006; 17(3): 686 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. Farrar, W. Zhou, T. Lin, and S. H. Sacks Local extravascular pool of C3 is a determinant of postischemic acute renal failure FASEB J, February 1, 2006; 20(2): 217 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Verschoor, M. A. Brockman, M. Gadjeva, D. M. Knipe, and M. C. Carroll Myeloid C3 Determines Induction of Humoral Responses to Peripheral Herpes Simplex Virus Infection J. Immunol., November 15, 2003; 171(10): 5363 - 5371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Sogabe, M. Nangaku, Y. Ishibashi, T. Wada, T. Fujita, X. Sun, T. Miwa, M. P. Madaio, and W.-C. Song Increased Susceptibility of Decay-Accelerating Factor Deficient Mice to Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Glomerulonephritis J. Immunol., September 1, 2001; 167(5): 2791 - 2797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
, n =
8; upper panel) and nonrejecting (*,
n = 10; 