The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Troelstra, A.
Right arrow Articles by Van Strijp, J. A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Troelstra, A.
Right arrow Articles by Van Strijp, J. A. G.
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 162: 4220-4225.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

Lipopolysaccharide-Coated Erythrocytes Activate Human Neutrophils Via CD14 While Subsequent Binding Is Through CD11b/CD18

Annet Troelstra1, Lia A. M. de Graaf-Miltenburg, Toon van Bommel, Jan Verhoef, Kok P. M. Van Kessel and Jos A. G. Van Strijp

Eijkman-Winkler Institute for Medical Microbiology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Interaction of LPS with monocytes and neutrophils is known to occur via CD14 and is strongly enhanced by LPS-binding protein (LBP). Integrins as well as CD14 play a role in the interaction of erythrocytes (E) coated with LPS or whole Gram-negative bacteria with phagocytes. We reasoned that the density of LPS on a particle is an important determinant in these interactions. Therefore, E were coated with different concentrations of LPS (ELPS). The binding of these ELPS to neutrophils was evaluated by flow cytometry. Simultaneously, we measured fMLP receptor expression to evaluate neutrophil activation. ELPS only bound to neutrophils in the presence of LBP. Blocking CD14 inhibited both activation and binding, whereas blocking complement (C) receptor 3 (CR3) inhibited binding but not activation. TNF activation restored ELPS binding in CD14-blocked cells but not in cells in which CR3 was blocked. Salmonella minnesota did bind to neutrophils independent of CR3 or CD14. The addition of LBP enhanced binding twofold, and this surplus was dependent upon CD14 but not on CR3. We conclude that ELPS interact with neutrophils via CD14, initially giving rise to cell activation; subsequently, binding is solely mediated by activated CR3.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Lipopolysaccharide or endotoxin is a major component of the Gram-negative cell wall and is one of the most important mediators of the clinical syndrome of sepsis. Sepsis is a severe situation in which the presence of Gram-negative bacteria in the bloodstream leads to the liberation of LPS from the cell wall. LPS gives rise to cell activation and to the production of TNF and cytokines, finally leading to multiple organ failure and death in 30–50% of cases (1). Until now, several classes of molecules on leukocytes have been recognized as receptors for LPS (2, 3, 4, 5).

CD14, a phosphatidylinositol-anchored molecule found on monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils, has been identified as a receptor that interacts with LPS. The interaction between LPS and phagocytes via CD14 is strongly enhanced by LPS-binding protein (LBP)2 (6).

Complement (C) receptor 3 (CR3) (CD11b/CD18) is a member of the leukocyte integrin family of heterodimeric adhesion molecules, consisting of a common ß-subunit and a unique {alpha}-subunit. (7). In 1986, a role for integrins in LPS-interaction was found by Wright (8). Each of the three members of the integrin family (CR3, LFA-1, and p150-95) were shown to mediate not only LPS interaction but the binding of Escherichia coli to macrophages as well (9).

CR3 is up-regulated and the adhesive capacity of leukocytes is increased after the interaction of CD14 with LPS and LBP (10). Monocytes from CD18-deficient patients or monocytes on which all three members of the ß-integrin family were down-modulated were unable to bind E. coli or E coated with LPS (ELPS) (8, 11, 12). From the CD18 receptor family, the binding specificity of CR3 is the most well characterized. Two distinct binding sites on CR3 have been described: 1) a protein-binding-site that binds C3bi, fibrinogen, and Leishmania glycoprotein 63, and 2) a lipid-binding-site involved in the binding of LPS, lipid A, and lipid IVA (13, 14, 15). Experiments with monocytes from CD18-deficient patients suggest no role for CD18 in secretory functions, because these cells were able to respond to LPS with the production of TNF-{alpha} and IL-1ß; in addition, neutrophils from these patients could be primed by LPS for an enhanced respiratory burst (12).

In an earlier report, we showed that LPS binding to monocytes is completely dependent upon CD14 at concentrations of <=100 ng LPS/ml (16). With higher concentrations, other interactions, which are LBP-independent, take over. This finding is in accordance with similar studies of cell activation by us and others, for which the same LPS concentration-dependent characteristics were found (17, 18).

To study the role of the surface properties of LPS, we constructed E coated with known amounts of LPS and compared the mechanism of neutrophil binding to free LPS and whole bacteria.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials

ReLPS from Salmonella minnesota strain Re595 and TNF were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Highly fluorescent rLPS was prepared as described previously (16). BSA was obtained from Organon Technika (Turnhout, Belgium). Recombinant human LBP was a generous gift of Dr. H. Lichenstein (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA). The orange fluorescent membrane probe PKH-26 was purchased from Sigma. BODIPY-fMLP (green) and LDS-751 (red) were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR).

Quantification of bacteria

S. minnesota strain Re595 was grown for 16 h in Mueller-Hinton broth (Oxoid, Hampshire, U.K.). The concentration of bacteria was determined by two completely independent methods. First, a suspension of bacteria was counted microscopically. Second, FITC-labeled standard beads of known concentration (Flow Cytometry Standards, San Juan, NC) were mixed with bacteria and measured in a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). Beads and bacteria were separately gated on the basis of their forward and side scatter properties and fluorescence. As 10,000 events passed through the count-gate (selecting only beads), the number of bacteria was measured in the same time window. Thereafter, the exact number of bacteria in the starting suspension could be calculated.

Monoclonal Abs

Hybridoma cells secreting the murine mAbs 60bca (IgG1, directed against CD14) and 44a (IgG1, directed against CD11b) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Culture supernatants were collected, and mAbs were purified over a protein G column (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). The production and characterization of mAb 8-2-c1, an IgM anti-LPS mAb, has been described previously (19). Goat anti-mouse FITC was obtained from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark).

Rabbit ELPS

Rabbit E were stained with PKH-26 as described previously (20). In short, rabbit E were washed three times with PBS; next, 5 x 108 E were suspended in 0.5 ml of PKH-26 diluent. Subsequently, 0.4 µl of PKH-26 was added to 0.5 ml of diluent, added to the E, and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped in HBSS containing 10% BSA for 5 min, and E were washed three times with HBSS/0.1% BSA. Subsequently, E were incubated with increasing concentrations of LPS (1–270 µg/ml) for 60 min at 37°C while being gently shaken and were washed three times with HBSS/0.1% BSA. In parallel, E were incubated with FITC-LPS in equal concentrations and washed; next, the FITC-LPS load was evaluated by flow cytometry. A linear relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.97 was found between the amount of FITC-LPS added and the observed amount of fluorescence that associates to the E.

Quantitation of LPS on ELPS and S. minnesota

As summarized in Table IGo, we evaluated the number of LPS molecules incorporated into the E membrane by three principally different methods. In experiments concerning the interaction of ELPS with neutrophils, the LPS-coated surface of the E will be in contact with the neutrophil. Therefore, the density of LPS molecules per surface is the most relevant parameter in our study. We calculated the surface of a rabbit E to be 39.3 µm2 (estimated radius of 2.5 µm) (21); the surface of S. minnesota was determined to be 9.4 µm2 (estimated length of 2 µm, estimated radius of 0.5 µm) (22). The LPS density of a Gram-negative bacterium has been the subject of research for several groups and is supposed to be 3 mg of LPS per 1012 CFU (23, 24, 25). The estimated molecular mass of LPS is 3200 g/mol (26, 27); from this, we calculated that ~60,000 molecules of LPS are present per µm2 on S. minnesota.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Comparison of LPS density on LPS-load erythrocytes and S. minnesota1

 
Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay

The LAL assay is a well-accepted method to liberate LPS from membranes or vesicles for LPS quantitation in heated samples (28). The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Chromogenics, Mölndal, Sweden). A standard curve was generated using known concentrations of rLPS. Test samples containing either ELPS coated with different amounts of LPS or S. minnesota were analyzed. A density of 97,000 LPS molecules per µm2 was found for S. minnesota, which is somewhat higher than the density of 60,000 LPS molecules per µm2 that has been described in other literature (23, 24, 25). We found a 2.6 times higher LPS density on S. minnesota than on ELPS coated with 270 µg/ml.

Flow cytometric analysis of ELPS or bacteria using an anti-LPS mAb

mAb 8-2-C1 directed against rLPS was incubated for 30 min at 37°C in a concentration of 10 µg/ml with either S. minnesota or ELPS. After washing with HBSS/0.1%BSA, samples were incubated for 15 min at 37°C with goat anti-mouse FITC in a saturating concentration. After washing, samples were analyzed in a FACScan. The data obtained with this method represent LPS molecules that were available for binding to the mAb and consequently are of interest with respect to the possibility of interacting with cellular receptors. With this method, we found that LPS density was 16.2 times higher for S. minnesota compared with ELPS270.

Flow cytometric analysis of ELPS using FITC beads

A series of beads coated with different numbers of FITC molecules (7,000–1,800,000) were used as standards. The mean fluorescence of the FITC beads was measured by flow cytometry; a standard curve was obtained. E were coated with 1–30 µg FITC-LPS as described previously, and mean fluorescence was determined. Using the standard curve, the amount of FITC molecules per E could be calculated. As our FITC-LPS was labeled with a labeling efficiency of one FITC-molecule per LPS molecule (16), the amount of LPS per E was obtained. LPS load on S. minnesota cannot be obtained using this method. If our calculations use 3 mg LPS/1012 CFU, as found in other literature, an LPS density ratio of 2.3 times more LPS per surface on S. minnesota compared with ELPS270 was found.

Cells

Neutrophils were isolated from peripheral blood obtained from normal human volunteers after informed consent. Blood was collected into heparin tubes (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany), diluted 1/1 with PBS (pH 7.4), loaded on a Ficoll (Pharmacia) and Histopaque (density 1.119, Sigma) gradient. After centrifugation for 20 min at 250 x g at room temperature, the neutrophil interface was collected and washed with RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) (pH 7.4) and 0.05% human serum albumin (CLB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The remaining E were lysed for 45 s with distilled water, after which concentrated PBS was added to reestablish the isotonic condition.

Cells were washed and resuspended in RPMI 1640 at 1 x 107 cells/ml and tested for viability and purity. Viability was always >95% using either trypan blue or propidium iodide exclusion. Purity was checked by microscopy of cytospin slides and was always >98%.

Flow cytometric assay for FITC-LPS binding

In a total volume of 50 µl, 5 x 105 neutrophils were incubated with increasing concentrations (1–125 ng/ml) of FITC-LPS in the presence of LBP (100 ng/ml) or HBSS containing 0.1% BSA. For blocking experiments, cells were first incubated for 15 min on ice with 20 µg/ml of the mAbs 60bca (anti-CD14) or 44a (anti-CR3). The mean fluorescence of neutrophils was analyzed by flow cytometry.

Flow cytometric assay for ELPS binding and activation

In a total volume of 60 µl, 2 x 105 neutrophils were mixed with 2 x 106 PKH-26-ELPS in the presence of 300 ng/ml LBP or HBSS/0.1% BSA, gently spun down for 5 min at 400 rpm, and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. For blocking or activation experiments, cells were preincubated for 15 min at 37°C with 20 µg/ml of mAb or 0.57 nM of TNF-{alpha}.

After the reaction was terminated, cells were put on ice and subsequently incubated with 10-7 M BODIPY-fMLP to determine the level of fMLP receptor expression. As activated neutrophils express more fMLP receptors, we used this as a marker for cell activation. Thereafter, samples were stained with LDS-751 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Molecular Probes) in a final concentration of 0.05 µg/ml per sample. LDS-751 is a selective red nuclear stain, and was used to distinguish neutrophils from unbound ELPS.

Flow cytometric assay for binding of S. minnesota to neutrophils

S. minnesota Re595 was grown overnight at 37°C in Mueller-Hinton broth, harvested, washed in PBS, resuspended in 0.1 M sodium carbonate buffer at pH 9.6 containing 47 µg/ml FITC (Isomer I; Sigma), incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and washed twice in HBSS. S. minnesota-FITC was incubated in a bacterium to neutrophil ratio of 10:1 or 30:1, and binding to neutrophils was analyzed by flow cytometry.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Binding of FITC-LPS to neutrophils depends upon LBP and CD14

Histograms of a representative experiment of neutrophils incubated with 42 ng/ml FITC-LPS are shown in Fig. 1GoA. Only in the presence of LBP (100 ng/ml) was FITC-LPS able to bind to neutrophils. Preincubating the neutrophils with anti-CD14 mAb resulted in a complete inhibition of binding (Fig. 1GoB). Neither preincubation with anti-CR3 (Fig. 1GoC) nor preincubation with anti-HLA (data not shown) had any effect on binding, confirming that the binding of FITC-LPS to neutrophils in the presence of LBP is completely CD14-dependent. These results are in complete accordance with literature describing LPS binding to monocytes and macrophages as dependent upon CD14 and LBP (29, 30).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. CD14-dependent binding of FITC-LPS to isolated neutrophils. Fluorescence histograms of a representative flow cytometric experiment of FITC-LPS binding to neutrophils are shown. Blank histograms represent neutrophils without FITC-LPS. A, Neutrophils were incubated with 42 ng/ml FITC-LPS in the presence of 100 ng/ml LBP and allowed to bind for 30 min at 37°C while being gently shaken. B and C, Neutrophils were preincubated with 10 µg/ml anti-CD14 mAb and anti-CR3 mAb at 4°C for 15 min, respectively.

 
ELPS binding and activation of neutrophils

Low binding to isolated neutrophils was observed for ELPS in the absence of LBP and was dependent upon LPS density. A significant enhancement of this binding was seen in the presence of LBP and was dependent upon the LPS load on the E (Fig. 2GoA).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Binding of ELPS to neutrophils depends upon both CD14 and CR3. ELPS (coated with different concentrations of LPS, resulting in an LPS density as indicated on the x-axis) were added to neutrophils in the presence of buffer ({square}) or 300 ng/ml LBP ({blacksquare}). Neutrophils were preincubated with buffer (A and D), anti-CD14 mAb (B and E), or anti-CR3 mAb (C and F) and could be identified on the basis of their red fluorescence (LDS-751, nuclear stain); E were labeled orange (PKH-26, membrane stain). The mean fluorescence (FL2, orange) of the neutrophil fraction is shown, representing the amount of ELPS bound to the neutrophils (A, B, and C). Measurement of BODIPY-labeled fMLP binding (FL1) on the same sample was used to determine neutrophil activation (D, E, and F). Data represent the mean of at least five independent experiments ± SEM.

 
In addition, with regard to the activation of neutrophils as measured by BODIPY-fMLP binding, we observed an LPS density-dependent activation of neutrophils that was enhanced by the addition of LBP (Fig. 2GoD).

After preincubation of the neutrophils with either anti-CD14 mAb (Fig. 2GoB) or anti-CR3 mAb (Fig. 2GoC), the binding of ELPS was completely blocked. The finding that anti-CD14 inhibited LBP-dependent binding is in accordance with earlier results. The fact that the LBP-independent part of the binding could be inhibited by anti-CD14 as well is in agreement with our previous finding that for LPS concentrations from 100 to 300-1000 ng/ml, binding is no longer LBP-dependent but is still partially mediated by CD14 (16).

The activation of neutrophils was inhibited by the preincubation of neutrophils with anti-CD14 (Fig. 2GoE), whereas preincubation with anti-CR3 had no effect on cell activation by ELPS (Fig. 2GoF). Preincubation with anti-HLA, as a control, did not affect binding or activation (data not shown). From these results, we speculated that ELPS interact with neutrophils via CD14, leading to the binding of ELPS to the activated CR3.

To evaluate whether neutrophil activation could indeed result in ELPS binding, we activated the neutrophils with a different agonist, TNF-{alpha}. Activation was confirmed by enhanced BODIPY-fMLP binding (Fig. 3GoD). TNF activation of neutrophils resulted in ELPS binding that was independent of LBP (Fig. 3GoA); however, binding was still dependent upon LPS density. The down-modulated ELPS binding to neutrophils after preincubation with anti-CD14 could indeed be restored by TNF-{alpha} activation of the neutrophils (Fig. 3GoB). After preincubation with anti-CR3, the binding of ELPS to TNF-{alpha}-activated neutrophils did not occur (Fig. 3GoC). From this observation, we conclude that ELPS interacts with the neutrophil via CD14, giving rise to activation (confirmed by enhanced fMLP receptor expression), and that the actual binding is mediated by activated CR3.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. ELPS bind to CR3 neutrophils after activation. ELPS (loaded with different concentrations of LPS, resulting in a certain LPS density as indicated on the x-axis) were added to neutrophils in the presence of buffer ({square}) or 300 ng/ml LBP ({blacksquare}), gently spun down for 5 min, and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Neutrophils were activated with 0.57 nM TNF for 15 min at 37°C and preincubated with buffer (A and D), anti-CD14 mAb (B and E), or anti-CR3 mAb (C and F) where indicated. The mean fluorescence (FL2) of the LDS-751 (FL3)-positive fraction is shown, representing the amount of ELPS bound to the neutrophils. Measurement of BODIPY-labeled fMLP binding (FL1) on the same sample was used to determine neutrophil activation (D, E, and F). Neutrophil activation was measured simultaneously from the association of BODIPY-labeled fMLP (FL-1). The same CR3 dependency was found after TNF activation of neutrophils for at least five different donors. As the absolute fluorescence data varied for different donors, one representative experiment of at least five independent experiments is shown for each graph.

 
S. minnesota-FITC binding to neutrophils

Because it is a particle that is naturally coated with LPS, S. minnesota was used to investigate the receptors involved in association with neutrophils. For E with the highest LPS load, ELPS270, we had already observed some LBP-independent binding to neutrophils. This trend was shown to be followed by a significant association of S. minnesota-FITC to neutrophils in the absence of LBP (Fig. 4GoA). For a bacteria to neutrophil ratio of 10:1 or 30:1, additional LBP enhanced binding by two- to threefold. In this case, microscopic evaluation of our samples revealed that this binding correlates with an association of ~1–2 bacteria per cell. Preincubating neutrophils with anti-CD14 mAb inhibited the LBP-dependent part of the binding, whereas anti-CR3 had no effect. These data suggest a role for CD14 in the activation of another receptor that is involved in the actual binding of particles with very high LPS load, such as S. minnesota. Significant LBP-independent binding was observed that was mediated by structures other than CD14 or CR3, as preincubation with mAbs directed at these receptors as well as control Abs (anti-HLA) had no effect on binding.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. A, S. minnesota bind to neutrophils in a CD14-dependent fashion. FITC-labeled S. minnesota were incubated with isolated neutrophils in a ratio of 10:1 for 30 min at 37°C in HBSS with (hatched bars) or without (open bars) 300 ng/ml LBP. S. minnesota-FITC association with neutrophils was measured by flow cytometry and presented as mean fluorescence (Fl-1). Microscopic evaluation revealed an association of ~1–2 bacteria per cell in the samples with LBP. In parallel, neutrophils were preincubated with 10 µg/ml anti-CD14 mAb or anti-CR3 mAb to investigate the role of these receptors. Bars represent the mean (± SEM) of three independent experiments using neutrophils from different donors. B, Binding of S. minnesota to activated neutrophils is independent of LBP, CD14, and CR3. Isolated neutrophils were preincubated for 15 min at 37°C with 0.57 nM TNF-{alpha} to allow activation. Subsequently, these neutrophils were incubated with FITC-labeled S. minnesota in a ratio of 10:1 for 30 min at 37°C in HBSS with (hatched bars) or without (open bars) 300 ng/ml LBP. S. minnesota-FITC association with neutrophils was measured by flow cytometry and presented as mean fluorescence (Fl-1). In parallel, after incubation with TNF-{alpha}, neutrophils were preincubated with 10 µg/ml anti-CD14 mAb or anti-CR3 mAb to investigate the role of these receptors. Bars represent the mean (± SEM) of three independent experiments using neutrophils from different donors.

 
TNF activation of neutrophils resulted in an association of S. minnesota that was independent of LBP, with mean fluorescence values that were comparable with the values seen for nonactivated cells in the presence of LBP; additional LBP gave no enhancement of binding. This finding indicated that cell activation caused an association of S. minnesota that was completely independent of LBP. Simultaneous TNF activation and blocking of CD14 or CR3 receptors on neutrophils had no effect on the binding of S. minnesota (Fig. 4GoB). From these results, we conclude that for activated neutrophils, the binding of a particle with a very high LPS density (i.e., S. minnesota) is independent of LBP, CD14, and CR3.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this paper, we describe experiments investigating the relative role of CD14 and CR3 in the interaction of phagocytes with LPS, E coated with LPS in different densities, and Gram-negative bacteria.

Fluorescein-labeled LPS has been used to study interactions with monocytes, and these interactions were shown to be dependent upon LBP or serum and CD14 (31). The same conditions, as shown in this paper, determine the binding of FITC-LPS to neutrophils. We have shown previously that binding to monocytes was enhanced by LBP or serum for LPS concentrations of <=100 ng/ml and was completely CD14-dependent and saturable (16). In chemiluminescence experiments with isolated neutrophils, the production of oxygen radicals after priming with 1 ng/ml LPS was also shown to be completely dependent upon LBP and CD14 (16). Consequently, for free LPS in low concentrations, as can be found in the clinical condition of Gram-negative sepsis (32), only CD14 was found to play a role.

For LPS concentrations of >100 ng/ml, binding to monocytes is still partially CD14-dependent but is not LBP-dependent (16). For an E coated with LPS or a Gram-negative bacterium, one might expect a local LPS concentration or density that is relatively high; therefore, other receptors than CD14 might be involved. We found that S. minnesota has an LPS density that is 2.6 times higher than our E with maximal LPS coat, ELPS270, according to the LAL assay and 2.3 times higher according to the FITC beads method. According to the method using anti-LPS Abs, ELPS270 had an LPS density that was 16.2 times higher than S. minnesota. However, we think that the latter method is too dependent upon the form in which the LPS is presented, which may explain the large difference with the other two methods used. The results for S. minnesota (obtained by LAL assay) were not significantly different from the literature. We found a density of 97,000 molecules per µm2, whereas a density of 60,000–180,000 is described in the literature (23, 24, 25, 33).

The binding of E coated with different amounts of LPS to isolated neutrophils was dependent upon LBP and was prevented by either anti-CD14 or anti-CR3 mAbs. Anti-CD14 preincubation prevented activation by ELPS; preincubation with anti-CR3 did not affect neutrophil activation. This observation led to our hypothesis that ELPS activate neutrophils via CD14 and subsequently bind to the activated CR3. This hypothesis was confirmed by the observation that ELPS bound to neutrophils activated by TNF-{alpha} (an LPS-independent activating agent) that were preincubated with anti-CD14. ELPS did not bind to activated neutrophils preincubated with anti-CR3. Therefore, an activating role is proposed for CD14 in the presence of LBP, although the actual binding of ELPS was mediated by the activated and up-regulated CR3. These findings illustrate a difference in the mechanism of interaction for free LPS and the LPS present on a particle.

Our finding that ELPS binding was mediated by CR3 is in accordance with the fact that monocytes or macrophages isolated from CD18-deficient patients are defective in the binding of ELPS or E. coli (12). LPS stimulation of phagocytes from CD18-deficient patients still results in the production of TNF-{alpha} and IL-1ß, and the neutrophils of these patients can be primed for an oxidative burst. Furthermore, Zarewych et al. recently showed that, indeed, LPS in the presence of serum or LBP induced a physical association between CD14 and CR3, leading to a CR3-mediated attachment of neutrophils to surfaces followed by a dissociation of CD14-CR3 complexes (34). These investigators suggested that CD14 serves as a scout for CR3, which, in turn, is responsible for transmembrane signaling and attachment of the cell.

We demonstrated an association of S. minnesota with neutrophils in the presence of buffer only. This association could be enhanced twofold by additional LBP.

The LBP-dependent part of the binding was inhibited by preincubating the cells with anti-CD14, indicating CD14-mediated binding. LBP-independent binding was not mediated by CD14. This corresponds with our previous finding that for high LPS concentrations, binding was only partially dependent upon CD14 (16). However, in contrast to ELPS, no reduction of LBP-dependent S. minnesota interaction with neutrophils was seen after preincubation with anti-CR3. LBP-independent binding was also not affected by anti-CR3. This illustrates that most of the LBP-dependent binding of S. minnesota is mediated by CD14. Recently, Grunwald et al. also showed a CD14-dependent interaction of monocytes with E. coli that was dependent upon serum or LBP that could be inhibited by anti-CD14 mAb, excess soluble sCD14, or excess LPS. A mAb directed at CR3 did not inhibit binding and ingestion. In the hands of these investigators, a significant background binding of E. coli was also seen (35). However, microscopic evaluation of our samples revealed an association of ~1–2 bacteria per cell. As observed after classical opsonization with C and Abs, this association is only marginal compared with the association of 7–8 bacteria per cell (36).

Our data show that structures other than CR3 and CD14 account for the binding of S. minnesota on activated cells, and this binding is independent of LBP. This finding is in contrast to ELPS that bound to CR3 after LBP-dependent neutrophil activation via CD14 or via direct TNF stimulation of the neutrophil.

The results described in this paper suggest that the way in which LPS is presented determines the mechanism of binding to neutrophils. Interaction of free LPS with neutrophils is completely mediated via CD14 and LBP, whereas for whole bacteria, the interaction is mainly independent of LBP and CD14. For E coated with LPS, a two-step mechanism is proposed: neutrophils are activated via CD14 and subsequently binding is mediated by CR3.


    Footnotes
 
1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Annet Troelstra, Eijkman-Winkler Institute for Medical Microbiology, Utrecht University, AZU G04.515, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail address: Back

2 Abbreviations used in this paper: LBP, LPS-binding protein; C receptor 3, CR3; ELPS, E coated with LPS; LAL, limulus amebocyte lysate. Back

Received for publication January 23, 1998. Accepted for publication December 22, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bone, R. C.. 1997. The pathogenesis of sepsis. Ann. Intern. Med. 114:457.
  2. Pugin, J., D. Heumann, A. Tomasz, V. Kravchenko, Y. Akamattsu, M. Nishijima, M. P. Glauser, P. S. Tobias, R. J. Ulevitch. 1994. CD14 is a pattern recognition receptor. Immunity 1:509.[Medline]
  3. Raetz, C. R., R. J. Ulevitch, S. D. Wright, C. H. Sibley, A. Ding, C. F. Nathan. 1991. Gram-negative endotoxin: an extraordinary lipid with profound effects on eukaryotic signal transduction. FASEB J. 5:2652.[Abstract]
  4. Wright, S. D.. 1995. CD14 and innate recognition of bacteria. J. Immunol. 155:6.[Medline]
  5. Wright, S. D.. 1991. Multiple receptors for endotoxin. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 3:83.[Medline]
  6. Wright, S. D., R. A. Ramos, P. S. Tobias, R. J. Ulevitch, J. C. Mathison. 1990. CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS-binding protein. Science 249:1431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hynes, R. O.. 1987. Integrins: a family of cell surface receptors. Cell 48:549.[Medline]
  8. Wright, S. D., M. T. C. Jong. 1986. Adhesion-promoting receptors on human macrophages recognize Escherichia coli by binding to lipopolysaccharide. J. Exp. Med. 164:1876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Wright, S. D.. 1991. Adhesion-promoting receptors on phagocytes. Agents Actions 35:23.
  10. Wright, S. D., R. A. Ramos, A. Hermanowski-Vosatka, P. Rockwell, P. A. Detmers. 1991. Activation of the adhesive capacity of CR3 on neutrophils by endotoxin: dependence on lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and CD14. J. Exp. Med. 173:1281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wright, S. D., P. S. Tobias, R. J. Ulevitch, R. A. Ramos. 1989. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding protein opsonizes LPS-bearing particles for recognition by a novel receptor on macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 170:1231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wright, S. D., P. A. Detmers, Y. Aida, R. Adamowski, D. C. Anderson, Z. Chad, L. G. Kabbash, M. J. Pabst. 1990. CD18-deficient cells respond to lipopolysaccharide in vitro. J. Immunol. 144:2566.[Abstract]
  13. Wright, S. D., S. M. Levin, M. T. C. Jong, Z. Chad, L. G. Kabbash. 1989. CR3 (CD11b/CD18) expresses one binding site for Arg-Gly-Asp-containing peptides and a second site for bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J. Exp. Med. 169:175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Van Strijp, J. A. G., D. G. Russell, E. Tuomanen, E. J. Brown, S. D. Wright. 1993. Ligand specificity of purified complement receptor type three (CD11b/CD18, {alpha}mß2, Mac-1): indirect effects of an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence. J. Immunol. 151:3324.[Abstract]
  15. Talamas-Rohana, P., S. D. Wright, M. R. Lennartz, D. G. Russell. 1990. Lipophosphoglycan from Leishmania mexicana promastigotes binds to members of the CR3, p150,95, and LFA-1 family of leukocyte integrins. J. Immunol. 144:4817.[Abstract]
  16. Troelstra, A., P. Antal-Szalmas, L. A. M. de Graaf-Miltenburg, A. J. L. Weersink, J. Verhoef, K. P. M. Van Kessel, J. A. G. Van Strijp. 1997. Saturable CD14-dependent binding of fluorescein-labeled lipopolysaccharide to human monocytes. Infect. Immun. 65:2272.[Abstract]
  17. Troelstra, A., B. N. Giepmans, K. P. M. Van Kessel, H. S. Lichenstein, J. Verhoef, J. A. G. Van Strijp. 1997. Dual effects of soluble CD14 on LPS priming of neutrophils. J. Leukocyte Biol. 61:173.[Abstract]
  18. Weersink, A. J. L., K. P. M. Van Kessel, R. Torensma, J. A. G. Van Strijp, J. Verhoef. 1990. Binding of rough lipopolysaccharides (LPS) to human leukocytes. J. Immunol. 145:318.[Abstract]
  19. Erich, T., A. Schellekens, A. Bouter, J. Van Kranen, E. Brouwer, J. Verhoef. 1989. Binding characteristics and cross-reactivity of three different antilipid A monoclonal antibodies. J. Immunol. 143:4053.[Abstract]
  20. Van Amersfoort, E. S., J. A. Van Strijp. 1994. Evaluation of a flow cytometric fluorescence quenching assay of phagocytosis of sensitized sheep erythrocytes by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Cytometry 17:294.[Medline]
  21. Frick, P.. 1982. Blut und Knochenmarksmorphologie Blutgerinnung: Ein Leitfaden 16th Ed. AnonymousGeorg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
  22. Anonymous, P.. 1992. Anatomie van bacterien. H. A. Verbrugh, and R. P. Mouton, and A. M. Polderman, eds. Medische Microbiologie 8th Ed.17. Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, Houten, The Netherlands.
  23. Jr Shands, J. W., P. W. Chun. 1980. The dispersion of gram-negative lipopolysaccharide by deoxycholate: subunit molecular weight. J. Biol. Chem. 255:1221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Freudenberg, M. A., U. Meier-Dieter, T. Staehelin, C. Galanos. 1991. Analysis of LPS released from Salmonella abortus equi in human serum. Microb. Pathog. 10:93.[Medline]
  25. Morrison, D. C., D. M. Jacobs. 1976. Binding of polymyxin B to the lipid A portion of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Immunochemistry 13:813.[Medline]
  26. Kitchens, R. L., R. S. Munford. 1995. Enzymatically deacylated lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can antagonize LPS at multiple sites in the LPS recognition pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 270:9904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Caroff, M., C. Deprun, D. Kariban. 1993. 252Cf plasma desorption mass spectrometry applied to the analysis of underivatized rough-type endotoxin preparations. J. Biol. Chem. 268:12321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sturk, A., M. E. Janssen, F. R. Muylaert, K. Joop, L. L. M. Thomas, J. W. ten Cate. 1987. Endotoxin testing in blood. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 231:371.[Medline]
  29. Tobias, P. S., K. Soldau, R. J. Ulevitch. 1986. Isolation of a lipopolysaccharide-binding acute phase reactant from rabbit serum. J. Exp. Med. 164:777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Schumann, R. R.. 1992. Function of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP) and CD14, the receptor for LPS/LBP complexes: a short review. Res. Immunol. 143:11.[Medline]
  31. Heumann, D., P. Gallay, C. Barras, P. Zaech, R. J. Ulevitch, P. S. Tobias, M. P. Glauser, J. D. Baumgartner. 1992. Control of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding and LPS-induced TNF secretion in human peripheral blood monocytes. J. Immunol. 148:3505.[Abstract]
  32. van Deventer, S. J. H., H. R. Buller, J. W. ten Cate, A. Sturk, W. Pauw. 1988. Endotoxaemia, an early predictor of septicaemia in febrile patients. Lancet i:605.
  33. Sommerville, J. E. J., L. Cassiano, B. Bainbridge, M. D. Cunningham, R. P. Darveau. 1996. A novel Escherichia coli lipid A mutant that produces an antiinflammatory lipopolysaccharide. J. Clin. Invest. 97:359.[Medline]
  34. Zarewych, D. M., A. L. Kindzelskii, R. F. Todd, R. H. Petty. 1996. LPS induces CD14 association with complement receptor type 3, which is reversed by neutrophil adhesion. J. Immunol. 156:430. (Abstr.). [Abstract]
  35. Grunwald, U., X. Fan, R. S. Jack, G. Workalemahu, A. Kallies, F. Stelter, C. Schutt. 1996. Monocytes can phagocytose gram-negative bacteria by a CD14-dependent mechanism. J. Immunol. 157:4119.[Abstract]
  36. Rozenberg-Arska, M., M. E. Salters, J. A. Van Strijp, J. J. Geuze, J. Verhoef. 1985. Electron microscopic study of phagocytosis of Escherichia coli by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Infect. Immun. 50:852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. M. Behrens, U. Sriram, D. K. Shivers, M. Gallucci, Z. Ma, T. H. Finkel, and S. Gallucci
Complement Receptor 3 Ligation of Dendritic Cells Suppresses Their Stimulatory Capacity
J. Immunol., May 15, 2007; 178(10): 6268 - 6279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. K. Behera, E. Hildebrand, S. Uematsu, S. Akira, J. Coburn, and L. T. Hu
Identification of a TLR-Independent Pathway for Borrelia burgdorferi-Induced Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Inflammatory Mediators through Binding to Integrin {alpha}3beta1
J. Immunol., July 1, 2006; 177(1): 657 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. L. Gioannini, D. Zhang, A. Teghanemt, and J. P. Weiss
An Essential Role for Albumin in the Interaction of Endotoxin with Lipopolysaccharide-binding Protein and sCD14 and Resultant Cell Activation
J. Biol. Chem., November 27, 2002; 277(49): 47818 - 47825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
P. M. Ellerbroek, A. I. M. Hoepelman, F. Wolbers, J. J. Zwaginga, and F. E. J. Coenjaerts
Cryptococcal Glucuronoxylomannan Inhibits Adhesion of Neutrophils to Stimulated Endothelium In Vitro by Affecting Both Neutrophils and Endothelial Cells
Infect. Immun., September 1, 2002; 70(9): 4762 - 4771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. E. J. Coenjaerts, A. M. E. Walenkamp, P. N. Mwinzi, J. Scharringa, H. A. T. Dekker, J. A. G. van Strijp, R. Cherniak, and A. I. M. Hoepelman
Potent Inhibition of Neutrophil Migration by Cryptococcal Mannoprotein-4-Induced Desensitization
J. Immunol., October 1, 2001; 167(7): 3988 - 3995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
T. H. Flo, L. Ryan, L. Kilaas, G. Skjak-Brak, R. R. Ingalls, A. Sundan, D. T. Golenbock, and T. Espevik
Involvement of CD14 and beta 2-Integrins in Activating Cells with Soluble and Particulate Lipopolysaccharides and Mannuronic Acid Polymers
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2000; 68(12): 6770 - 6776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
J. Dellacasagrande, E. Ghigo, S. Machergui-El, Hammami, R. Toman, D. Raoult, C. Capo, and J.-L. Mege
alpha vbeta 3 Integrin and Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide Are Involved in Coxiella burnetii-Stimulated Production of Tumor Necrosis Factor by Human Monocytes
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2000; 68(10): 5673 - 5678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Q. Jiang, S. Akashi, K. Miyake, and H. R. Petty
Cutting Edge: Lipopolysaccharide Induces Physical Proximity Between CD14 and Toll-Like Receptor 4 (TLR4) Prior to Nuclear Translocation of NF-{kappa}B
J. Immunol., October 1, 2000; 165(7): 3541 - 3544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. van der Flier, F. Coenjaerts, J. L. L. Kimpen, A. M. Hoepelman, and S. P. M. Geelen
Streptococcus pneumoniae Induces Secretion of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor by Human Neutrophils
Infect. Immun., August 1, 2000; 68(8): 4792 - 4794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
P. Hofman, M. Piche, D. F. Far, G. Le Negrate, E. Selva, L. Landraud, A. Alliana-Schmid, P. Boquet, and B. Rossi
Increased Escherichia coli Phagocytosis in Neutrophils That Have Transmigrated across a Cultured Intestinal Epithelium
Infect. Immun., February 1, 2000; 68(2): 449 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Troelstra, A.
Right arrow Articles by Van Strijp, J. A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Troelstra, A.
Right arrow Articles by Van Strijp, J. A. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS