|
|
||||||||



*
Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum, Berlin, Germany;
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Department of Parasitology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; and
§
Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most studies on cytokine expression examined populations of Th cells
rather than single cells. Consequently, it could not be determined
whether individual cells coordinately express certain cytokines or
heterogenous combinations of cytokines. Some of the pioneering studies
of cytokine expression of single cells (11, 12, 13) suffer from the fact
that the methods employed allowed the analysis of only limited numbers
of cells. We (6, 14, 15) and others (16, 17, 18) have investigated
coexpression of cytokines in large numbers of individual Th cells using
flow cytometry. Many of these studies were performed to determine the
stability or plasticity of Th subsets and thus analyzed the
(co)expression of IFN-
and IL-4 in transgenic T cells primed and
restimulated in vitro. Collectively, these studies indicated that type
1 and type 2 cytokines can be coexpressed by an individual T cell,
either simultaneously (6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18) or sequentially (15).
To investigate whether cytokine coexpression in single Th cells during an in vivo immune response is stochastic or follows the typical Th1/Th2 patterns observed in polarized T cell populations, it is necessary to examine individual in vivo-activated T cells. Such experiments have been difficult to perform, partly due to the low number of Ag-specific T cells obtainable directly ex vivo and partly for lack of reliable markers for Th subsets. We describe here a detailed analysis of CD4+ T cells isolated from the lungs of mice containing Schistosoma mansoni egg-induced granulomas. The egg-induced granuloma formation is dependent on CD4+ T cells (19). Granuloma formation occurs in the liver of naturally infected mice and can be induced in the lungs after i.v. injection of parasite eggs into mice (20). Schistosome egg-induced lung inflammation is a valuable experimental system in which to study granuloma development and immune regulation. During granuloma development, the dominant T cell response changes from an ephemeral Th1 response to a sustained Th2 response that is most prominent at the height of granulomatous activity (21, 22, 23, 24). Because the Th cell response in schistosome egg-induced granulomas is Th2-dominated rather than exclusively Th2, these granulomas are very suitable to study the coexpression of type 1 and type 2 cytokines in CD4+ T cells.
Recently, we (25) and others (26, 27) reported that T1/ST2, an orphan receptor with sequence homology to the IL-1RI, is expressed preferentially on murine Th2 cells. Here we examined whether during an in vivo immune response against S. mansoni eggs T1/ST2 was up-regulated and correlated with type 2 cytokine production. In addition, we analyzed individual Th cells, directly ex vivo, for coexpression of up to three type 1 and type 2 cytokines.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
S. mansoni eggs were recovered from the livers of infected mice as described (28), washed, and frozen. Six-week-old BALB/c mice were immunized twice with 5000 S. mansoni eggs (frozen and thawed) in PBS i.p. at day 0 and week 3. At week 6, mice received 5000 eggs in 200 µl PBS i.v. and were sacrificed 811 days later. Age- and sex-matched control BALB/c mice were injected with PBS only. Eight-week-old C57BL/6 mice were infected by exposure to 65 S. mansoni cerceriae percutaneously and sacrificed 11 wk later. Age- and sex-matched untreated C57BL/6 mice were used as controls. All animal experiments were performed according to institutional and state guidelines.
Cell suspensions
Single-cell suspensions were prepared from spleens, and
paratracheal, mesenteric, inguinal, axillary, and mandibular lymph
nodes (LN)4 in RPMI 1640
supplemented with serum and antibiotics as described (25). Spleen cells
(5 x 106/ml) or LN cells (3 x
106/ml) were cultured with medium alone or soluble egg
antigen (SEA; 20 µg/ml) prepared as described (29). Supernatants were
collected at 72 h for detection of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-2, and
IFN-
by sandwich ELISA as described (25).
Isolation of cells from hepatic granulomas and granulomatous lungs
BALB/c mice immunized with S. mansoni eggs, and control mice, were sacrificed and the lungs immediately perfused with 10 ml PBS through the right ventricle of the heart. Single-cell suspensions were prepared by forcing the lung tissue through fine wire mesh. Such cell suspensions contain cells from granulomas, bronchial-associated lymphoid tissue, and other inflammatory cells. The isolation of hepatic granulomas from S. mansoni-infected C57BL/6 mice was performed as described (30).
Abs and flow cytometry
The T1/ST2-specific mAb 3E10 (25) was used together with
phycoerythrin (PE)- or FITC-conjugated mAbs against CD4 (GK1.5), CD8
(53-6.7), CD11b (Mac-1; M1/70), CD11c (N418), CD45R (B220; RA3-6B2),
CD62L (L-selectin; MEL-14), and 
-TCR (GL3; PharMingen, San Diego,
CA) as described (25). To prevent unspecific binding of 3E10,
all samples were incubated with blocking anti-Fc
RII/III mAb
2.4G2/75 (100 µg/ml) and purified rat IgG (200 µg/ml; Nordic,
Tilburg, The Netherlands) 10 min before and during staining of T1/ST2.
T1/ST2+ cells were detected using digoxigenized 3E10 (1.5
µg/ml), followed by anti-digoxigenin (Dig) Fab (Boehringer
Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) conjugated to Cy5. To control for
specificity, staining of 3E10 was blocked by preincubating cells with a
100-fold excess of unconjugated 3E10 as described (25). Samples were
analyzed on a FACS-Calibur using CellQuest software (Becton
Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). Gates were set on viable cells
according to forward and side scatter and exclusion of propidium
iodide-binding particles (0.3 µg/ml).
Magnetic separation of CD4+ cells
CD4+ cells were isolated from lungs of BALB/c mice with S. mansoni egg-induced granulomas by high-gradient magnetic cell separation (MACS; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany). Lung cells were incubated with CD4 mAb coupled to magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturers instructions and sorted using VS+ MACS columns and the MidiMACS system (Miltenyi Biotec). Aliquots of the unsorted and the CD4-selected cell fractions were stained with CD4-PE and analyzed by flow cytometry. The CD4+ population was sorted to a purity of >98%.
Four-color single-cell analysis of surface T1/ST2 and three intracellular cytokines in CD4+ cells by flow cytometry
Separated CD4+ cells (106/ml) from lungs
of BALB/c mice with S. mansoni egg-induced granulomas were
stimulated with PMA (50 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 µg/ml; Sigma, St.
Louis, MO) for 5 h. At 2 h, brefeldin A (Sigma) was added at
5 µg/ml. Before fixation, cells were washed, incubated with blocking
anti-Fc
R mAb and rat IgG as described above, and stained for
T1/ST2 with biotinylated 3E10 (5 µg/ml). Cells were washed and fixed
with 2% formaldehyde for 15 min as described (14). T1/ST2 was detected
on the surface of the fixed CD4+ cells using streptavidin
coupled to peridinin chlorophyll protein (PerCP; 1 µg/ml; Becton
Dickinson). Cells were washed and then permeabilized with saponin
(0.5%; Sigma) for intracellular staining simultaneously with three
anti-cytokine mAbs conjugated to either FITC, PE, or Dig. The
following mAbs were used: FITC-coupled anti-IFN-
(XMG1.2),
anti-IL-5 (TRFK5), and anti-IL-10 (JES5-16E3) at 5 µg/ml
(PharMingen); PE-coupled anti-IL-4 (11B11), anti-IL-5 (TRFK5),
anti-IL-10 (JES5-16E3), and anti-TNF-
(MP6-XT22) at 3
µg/ml (PharMingen); digoxigenized anti-IL-2 (S4B6), anti-IL-4
(11B11), and anti-TNF-
(MP6-XT22) were prepared in our lab, used
at 3 µg/ml, and subsequently detected with anti-Dig conjugated to
Cy5. Anti-Dig-Cy5, FITC-, or PE-labeled isotype control mAbs
(PharMingen) were used at the same concentrations as the respective
anti-cytokine mAbs. Samples were analyzed by four-color flow
cytometry on a FACScalibur, and
150,000 cells were acquired for each
sample.
Statistical analysis of intracellular cytokine coexpression and surface T1/ST2
The observed value for cytokine-coexpressing cells in percent
was compared with the expected value calculated for random coincidence
of two independent variables. Correlations of cytokine coexpression in
total CD4+, T1/ST2-, and T1/ST2+
CD4+ cells were calculated using the test for
-correlation coefficients (31). Coefficients of
-0.1 or
0.1 were considered significant in this analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We investigated T1/ST2 expression and cytokine production in
CD4+ T cells obtained from lungs of mice with S.
mansoni egg-induced granulomas. BALB/c mice were immunized with
S. mansoni eggs as described in Materials and
Methods. The frequency of T1/ST2-expressing CD4+ cells
was highest in the granulomatous lungs: 42.9 ± 1.7% (mean
± SD) of CD4+ cells vs 4.4 ± 1.4% in PBS-injected
control mice. This decreased to 8.7 ± 0.3% in the paratracheal
draining LNs (0.7 ± 0.1% in controls), 5.6 ± 0.3% of
splenic CD4+ cells (2.0 ± 0.9% in control mice), and
2.0 ± 0.2% of the CD4+ cells in nondraining LNs
(0.8 ± 0.2% in controls, Fig. 1
A).
Determination of cytokine secretion in in vitro cultures of spleen and
LN cells in response to SEA showed that IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 were
preferentially produced in the paratracheal LN (data not shown). In
naturally infected C57BL/6 mice, the frequency of T1/ST2-expressing
CD4+ cells was highest in the liver granulomas (61.9
± 1.4% of CD4+ cells vs 0.6 ± 0.1% in control
livers) and gradually decreased to control values in nondraining LNs
(Fig. 1
B). More than 90% of the CD4+
T1/ST2+ cells from lung or liver granulomas were
Ag-experienced CD62Llow cells, which complements our
earlier findings in unimmunized mice (25). Additionally, in the lung
T1/ST2 was not expressed on CD8+ T cells, 
T cells,
CD45R+ B cells, CD11bhigh macrophages, or
CD11chigh dendritic cells (data not shown).
|
CD4+ cells from granulomatous lungs were sorted by
MACS to 99% purity (Fig. 2
A), stimulated
with PMA/ionomycin, and stained for surface T1/ST2 and intracellular
cytokines (Fig. 2
B). IFN-
was produced by 23% of the
T1/ST2- CD4+ cells compared with 9% of the
T1/ST2+ cells. In the T1/ST2+
IFN-
+ population, the brightness of staining for T1/ST2
and IFN-
was inversely correlated such that very few cells that
stained brightly for T1/ST2 produced IFN-
(2% IFN-
+
cells among the 5% T1/ST2 brightest cells). Similarly, TNF-
producers were found mostly in the T1/ST2- fraction of Th
cells. On the other hand, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 producers were all
enriched more than threefold in the T1/ST2+ fraction.
IL-10-producing cells were particularly frequent among the cells
staining brightest for T1/ST2 (37% IL-10+ cells among the
5% T1/ST2 brightest cells). Of note, the frequency of IL-2-expressing
cells was higher in the T1/ST2+ subset (69%) compared with
the T1/ST2- cells (34%). Thus, T1/ST2 expression was not
only positively correlated with type 2 cytokines but also with IL-2
production.
|
The cytokine coexpression capacity of the T1/ST2- vs
T1/ST2+ cells was determined by four-color FACS.
CD4+ cells from BALB/c lungs with schistosome egg-induced
granulomas were purified, stimulated, and stained as described for Fig. 2
. The coexpression of each possible pair of the analyzed cytokines in
the total CD4+ population and in T1/ST2- or
T1/ST2+ CD4+ cells is summarized in Table I
. The observed frequencies of cytokine-coexpressing
cells are compared with those calculated for expected values (i.e.,
random coincidence) to determine whether coexpression is coordinate or
independent. Correlation coefficients are shown for each cytokine pair.
|
and TNF-
, but
also with the expression of IL-4 and IL-5 (Fig. 3
) or
type 2 cytokines (such as IL-4 or IL-5), with the exception that these
IL-2-expressing cells are unlikely to coexpress IL-10.
|
in the total CD4+ population. Conversely, IL-10 was
positively associated with IL-4 but not with IL-5. These correlations
were all confined to the T1/ST2+ cells and not found in the
T1/ST2- cells (Fig. 4
, which was random in the total
CD4+ population (Fig. 3
(Table I
|
coefficient
-0.1 or
0.1) were
also significant in the other. The one difference in the
T1/ST2+ population was the coexpression of IL-10 and IL-4.
The
values were 0.10 (Table I
coexpression, where the
values were
0.09 (Table IInfluence of the production of a third cytokine on the coexpression of two other cytokines
We analyzed the expression of cytokine triplets to determine how a
third cytokine might influence the coexpression of a given cytokine
pair, within the total CD4+ population and its
T1/ST2- and T1/ST2+ subsets (Table II
). In several triplets, a third cytokine drastically
altered the coexpression frequency of a given pair. An example is given
in Fig. 5
, in which CD4+ cells are gated
according to T1/ST2 expression and further on their IL-2 production.
The four resulting subpopulations were analyzed for coexpression of
IL-4 and IFN-
. IL-4 and IFN-
production correlated significantly
(
= 0.42) only in the CD4+ T1/ST2-
cells that did not produce IL-2. In those T1/ST2- cells
that produced IL-2, the association of IL-4 and IFN-
expression was
abrogated (
= -0.05). In contrast, in the
T1/ST2+ subset IL-4 and IFN-
production were independent
events irrespective of the expression of IL-2. The positive correlation
of IL-2 and IL-4 or IL-2 and IFN-
was dissociated by the additional
coexpression of IFN-
or IL-4, respectively, in both the
T1/ST2- and the T1/ST2+ populations (Table II
). In the T1/ST2- cells, expression of IL-5 abrogated
the association of IL-4 and IFN-
expression. Even more drastically,
the positive association of IL-5 and IFN-
expression was reverted to
a negative correlation by the additional coexpression of IL-4 in
the T1/ST2- cells. In both subsets IL-2 and TNF-
were positively associated independently of IL-5 expression. In
contrast, IL-5 and TNF-
were significantly inversely correlated only
in the presence of IL-2 within both T1/ST2- and
T1/ST2+ cells. This is further demonstrated with the
cytokine pair IL-5 and IL-2, which were more likely to be coexpressed
in the absence of TNF-
. An example illustrating that a third
cytokine in a given triplet does not necessarily influence the
coexpression of cytokine pairs is given by the triplet IL-5, IL-2,
IL-10. The correlation of any of the three possible cytokine pairs was
not altered in the absence or presence of the third cytokine analyzed,
in neither the T1/ST2- nor the T1/ST2+ cells.
|
|
coefficient
-0.1 or
0.1) were also significant in the
other. A small difference was observed in the coexpression of IL-4 and
IFN-
in the absence of IL-5 production between the experiments:
values 0.04 (Table II
-producing
T1/ST2+ cells differed:
values 0.05 (Table II
, which were randomly
coexpressed in one experiment (
= 0.08, Table II
= 0.13, data not shown). | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IL-2 production was a shared characteristic of Th cells, either T1/ST2
positive or negative, obtained from the granulomas. Both IL-4 and IL-5
were frequently coproduced with IL-2 (Fig. 3
). Others found IL-5
production in schistosome-infected mice dependent on IL-2 (32, 33, 34).
However, IL-2 production is not characteristic of Th2 cells and we have
not observed significant percentages of IL-2-producing Th2 cells in
vitro (A. Richter, M. Löhning, unpublished observations). A T
cell population that coproduces IL-4 or IL-5 together with IL-2 could
reasonably be called Th0. What, then, is the significance of T1/ST2
expressed on the surface of these cells? Could these cells be recently
activated "en route" to becoming Th2 cells? Our coexpression data
(Tables I and II and see below) would support that hypothesis. On the
other hand, as almost 70% of the T1/ST2+ CD4+
cells produced IL-2, it is difficult to imagine that all these cells
were in a transitional stage of their phenotype development. With
current technology it cannot be determined if T1/ST2+
IL-2/IL-4 (or IL-2/IL-5) coproducers are recently or chronically
activated. Thus, we cannot answer the question if this coexpression
pattern is stable or transient. In summary, the data indicate that in
CD4+ cells from lungs containing schistosome-induced
granulomas T1/ST2 is not expressed exclusively on typical Th2 cells.
Could this be because there are not too many typical Th2 cells in vivo?
The categorization of Th cells into different subsets according to
their cytokine production is based on the behavior of highly
differentiated Th cell populations (1, 7, 8, 9, 35). It is a matter of
current debate if the cytokine production patterns of individual T
cells within a highly differentiated population mirror the pattern
observed for the population. Currently, there are two competing
hypotheses. The first states that coexpression of type 1 or type 2
cytokines by individual cells is the cellular basis for the Th1/Th2
dichotomy observed on the population level. The competing hypothesis
predicts that cytokine coexpression in individual cells is stochastic
and polarized Th1 or Th2 populations are composed of selected T cells
(36, 37). These hypotheses can only be tested by single-cell analysis
of T cell cytokine production, preferably in vivo. There are several
published reports detailing the results of studies on the coexpression
of IL-4 and IFN-
in TCR-transgenic cells in vitro (6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). We
have used an in vivo model combined with magnetic cell separation and
four-color flow cytometry to analyze cytokine coexpression in Th cells.
We simultaneously analyzed the expression of one cell surface molecule,
T1/ST2, and three different cytokines intracellularly at the
single-cell level for a large number of CD4+ cells obtained
from lungs containing schistosome egg-induced granulomas. Similar to
earlier findings (6, 11), we found random coexpression of IFN-
and
IL-4 in the total CD4+ population. However, analysis of the
different subpopulations revealed striking differences: in the
T1/ST2- population but not in the T1/ST2+
population, IFN-
and IL-4 were frequently coexpressed. Triple
analysis of intracellular cytokine staining showed that IL-4 and
IFN-
production were positively correlated only in those
T1/ST2- cells that produced neither IL-2 nor IL-5 (Table II
and Fig. 5
). Thus, the production of either IL-2 or IL-5
dramatically decreased the likelihood of IL-4/IFN-
coexpression. A
similar pattern was found for the coexpression of IL-2, IL-5, and
TNF-
. Importantly, these observations are not due to the fact that a
cell is less likely to produce three different cytokines than two: our
analysis of the coexpression of IL-2, IL-5, and IL-10 revealed no
significant influence of either one of the cytokines on the likelihood
of coproduction of the other two cytokines (Table II
). Thus, a Th cell
can simultaneously produce both a type 1 and a type 2 cytokine.
Coproduction of two type 1 or two type 2 cytokines strongly decreases
the likelihood of such a cell producing a "contrasting" cytokine.
Complementing this scenario is the finding that
T1/ST2+ or T1/ST2- CD4+ cells
displayed different patterns of cytokine coexpression. The coexpression
of any type 2 cytokine (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10) with any type 1 cytokine
(IFN-
, IL-2) was less likely in the T1/ST2+ than the
T1/ST2- population, albeit to varying degrees (Table I
).
Similarly, the
-correlation coefficients for coexpression of any two
of the type 1 cytokines IL-2, IFN-
, or the proinflammatory cytokine
TNF-
were always lower in the T1/ST2+ population than in
the T1/ST2- cells. On the other hand, the coexpression of
IL-4 and IL-10 was more likely in the T1/ST2+ than the
T1/ST2- population, and this effect was further
strengthened when only those CD4+ cells that stained most
brightly for T1/ST2 were analyzed (5% brightest cells,
= 0.16).
Collectively, these data are consistent with the notion that Th1 or Th2
cytokine genes are not switched on or off in mutually exclusive sets.
Instead, they are compatible with the hypothesis that during the
evolution of an immune response in vivo there are checkpoints for Th
phenotype development. Both the coexpression of at least two type 2
cytokines or the surface expression of T1/ST2 together with the
production of one type 2 cytokine indicate commitment of the cell to
Th2 phenotype development, whereas expression of at least two Th1
cytokines indicates commitment to Th1 phenotype development.
Most in vitro analyses of Th phenotype development found stable
expression of either IL-4 or IFN-
after three cycles of antigenic
stimulation and rest (6, 17, 18, 38, 39, 40). This is due, at least partly,
to the down-regulation of IL-4 signaling in Th1 cells (41) and the
down-regulation of IL-12 signaling in Th2 cells (42). However, in the
presence of IFN-
the IL-12 responsiveness of Th2 cells can be
maintained (39, 43, 44, 45). We found that 1525% of all Th cells from
granulomatous lungs produced IFN-
. Similarly, others have isolated
IFN-
-producing Leishmania-specific T cells from
Leishmania-infected BALB/c mice in which a Th2 response had
already been established (46, 47). Furthermore, it was recently
reported that schistosome-induced liver granulomas contain Th cells
capable of responding to IL-12 (48). The continuous presence of IFN-
could explain the greater plasticity of cytokine production that we
observed in vivo as compared with the extremely skewed experimental
conditions in vitro. Therefore, our in vivo findings would justify some
optimism regarding the possibility of manipulating established Th1 or
Th2 responses in vivo.
In summary, our data show that T1/ST2 expression colocalizes with Th2 responses in vivo. Single-cell analysis of cytokine coexpression revealed different levels of commitment to Th subsets. Every possible combination of one type 1 with one type 2 cytokine was observed in total CD4+ cells. However, the likelihood of type1/type2 cytokine coexpression was reduced in T1/ST2+ cells as compared with T1/ST2- cells, and the expression of two type 2 cytokines made the expression of a type 1 cytokine very unlikely and vice versa. Thus, coexpression of two type 2 cytokines or production of one type 2 cytokine together with surface expression of T1/ST2 are indicators of advanced commitment to the Th2 phenotype.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 M.L. and J.L.G. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas Kamradt, Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum, Monbijoustrasse 2, 10117 Berlin, Germany. E-mail address: ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: LN, lymph node; Dig, digoxigenin; MACS, high-gradient magnetic cell separation; PE, phycoerythrin; PerCP, peridinin chlorophyll protein; SEA, soluble egg antigen. ![]()
Received for publication October 2, 1998. Accepted for publication December 24, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
receptor ß chain and the prevention of interferon
signaling in TH1 cells. Science 269:245.
versus IL-4 and IL-10: selective induction of IL-10 by sequential stimulation of naive Th cells with IL-12 and IL-4. J. Immunol. 161:2825.
and interleukin-4-expressing cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1097.[Medline]
and IL-10 by individual staphylococcal enterotoxin B-activated T helper lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:1534.[Medline]
interferon, and interleukins 3 and 4 is random in murine alloreactive T-lymphocyte clones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:9189.
production is cytokine-dependent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:3189.
-producing CD4+ T cells following activation of naive CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 158:1085.[Abstract]
in stabilizing the T helper cell type 1 and 2 phenotype. J. Immunol. 158:2648.[Abstract]
production within the granulomas of murine schistosomiasis in IL-4-deficient and control mice. J. Immunol. 160:4994.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Smithgall, M. R. Comeau, B.-R. Park Yoon, D. Kaufman, R. Armitage, and D. E. Smith IL-33 amplifies both Th1- and Th2-type responses through its activity on human basophils, allergen-reactive Th2 cells, iNKT and NK Cells Int. Immunol., August 1, 2008; 20(8): 1019 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Debes, M. E. Dahl, A. J. Mahiny, K. Bonhagen, D. J. Campbell, K. Siegmund, K. J. Erb, D. B. Lewis, T. Kamradt, and A. Hamann Chemotactic Responses of IL-4-, IL-10-, and IFN-{gamma}-Producing CD4+ T Cells Depend on Tissue Origin and Microbial Stimulus J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 557 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Matthews, J. S. Tregoning, A. J. Coyle, T. Hussell, and P. J. M. Openshaw Role of CCL11 in Eosinophilic Lung Disease during Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection J. Virol., February 15, 2005; 79(4): 2050 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Dorner, H. R.C. Smith, A. R. French, S. Kim, J. Poursine-Laurent, D. L. Beckman, J. T. Pingel, R. A. Kroczek, and W. M. Yokoyama Coordinate Expression of Cytokines and Chemokines by NK Cells during Murine Cytomegalovirus Infection J. Immunol., March 1, 2004; 172(5): 3119 - 3131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Rutitzky, E. Ozkaynak, J. B. Rottman, and M. J. Stadecker Disruption of the ICOS-B7RP-1 Costimulatory Pathway Leads to Enhanced Hepatic Immunopathology and Increased Gamma Interferon Production by CD4 T Cells in Murine Schistosomiasis Infect. Immun., July 1, 2003; 71(7): 4040 - 4044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kropf, S. Herath, R. Tewari, N. Syed, R. Klemenz, and I. Muller Identification of Two Distinct Subpopulations of Leishmania major-Specific T Helper 2 Cells Infect. Immun., October 1, 2002; 70(10): 5512 - 5520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jakubzick, S. L. Kunkel, B. H. Joshi, R. K. Puri, and C. M. Hogaboam Interleukin-13 Fusion Cytotoxin Arrests Schistosoma mansoni Egg-Induced Pulmonary Granuloma Formation in Mice Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2002; 161(4): 1283 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Dorner, A. Scheffold, M. S. Rolph, M. B. Huser, S. H. E. Kaufmann, A. Radbruch, I. E. A. Flesch, and R. A. Kroczek MIP-1alpha , MIP-1beta , RANTES, and ATAC/lymphotactin function together with IFN-gamma as type 1 cytokines PNAS, April 30, 2002; 99(9): 6181 - 6186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Walzl, S. Matthews, S. Kendall, J. C. Gutierrez-Ramos, A. J. Coyle, P. J.M. Openshaw, and T. Hussell Inhibition of T1/St2 during Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection Prevents T Helper Cell Type 2 (Th2)- but Not Th1-Driven Immunopathology J. Exp. Med., April 2, 2001; 193(7): 785 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Meisel, K. Bonhagen, M. Lohning, A. J. Coyle, J.-C. Gutierrez-Ramos, A. Radbruch, and T. Kamradt Regulation and Function of T1/ST2 Expression on CD4+ T Cells: Induction of Type 2 Cytokine Production by T1/ST2 Cross-Linking J. Immunol., March 1, 2001; 166(5): 3143 - 3150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Infante-Duarte, H. F. Horton, M. C. Byrne, and T. Kamradt Microbial Lipopeptides Induce the Production of IL-17 in Th Cells J. Immunol., December 1, 2000; 165(11): 6107 - 6115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Richter, M. Lohning, and A. Radbruch Instruction for Cytokine Expression in T Helper Lymphocytes in Relation to Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression J. Exp. Med., November 15, 1999; 190(10): 1439 - 1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Coyle, C. Lloyd, J. Tian, T. Nguyen, C. Erikkson, L. Wang, P. Ottoson, P. Persson, T. Delaney, S. Lehar, et al. Crucial Role of the Interleukin 1 Receptor Family Member T1/St2 in T Helper Cell Type 2-Mediated Lung Mucosal Immune Responses J. Exp. Med., October 4, 1999; 190(7): 895 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Dorner, A. Scheffold, M. S. Rolph, M. B. Huser, S. H. E. Kaufmann, A. Radbruch, I. E. A. Flesch, and R. A. Kroczek MIP-1alpha , MIP-1beta , RANTES, and ATAC/lymphotactin function together with IFN-gamma as type 1 cytokines PNAS, April 30, 2002; 99(9): 6181 - 6186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |