|
|
||||||||
Region: Assessment of Regulatory Function In Vivo1
The Basel Institute for Immunology, Basel, Switzerland
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/
locus is
crucial for development of the 
and
ß T cell lineages.
Because the TCR
locus is embedded within the
locus,
rearrangement of any V
-J
excises the
locus, precluding
expression of a functional 
TCR. Approximately 100 kb spanning
the C
-C
region has been sequenced from both human and mouse, and
comparison has revealed an unexpectedly high degree of conservation
between the two. Of interest in terms of regulation, several highly
conserved sequence blocks (>90% over >50 bp) were identified that
did not correspond to known regulatory elements such as the TCR
and
enhancers or to coding regions. One of these blocks lying between
J
4 and J
3, which appears to be conserved in other vertebrates,
has been shown to augment TCR
enhancer function in vitro and
differentially bind factors from nuclear extracts. To further assess a
plausible regulatory role for this element, we have created mice in
which this conserved sequence block is either deleted or replaced with
a neomycin resistance gene driven by the phosphoglycerate kinase
promoter (pgk-neor). Deletion of this conserved sequence
block in vivo did have a local effect on J
usage, echoing the in
vitro data. However, its replacement with pgk-neor had a
much more dramatic, long range effect, perhaps underscoring the
importance of maintaining overall structure at this
locus. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|

or
ß. How these two lineages are developmentally related
has been extensively studied, particularly in mice. During ontogeny,
,
, and ß gene rearrangement occurs several days before
rearrangement; hence, 
-expressing cells can be detected around
fetal day 14, whereas
ß cells are not evident until days 17 or 18
2, 3 . A similar, albeit compressed, pattern of rearrangement occurs
in the adult thymus, as
,
, and ß rearrangements occur during
an immature CD4-CD8- double-negative stage,
whereas significant
rearrangements are not detected until the more
mature CD4+/CD8+ double-positive
(DP)3 stage of development
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 . This temporal regulation is critical, because the
locus
lies within the
locus 10, 11, 12 , thus rearrangement of any V
to
any J
excises the
locus, precluding expression of a 
receptor. Therefore, understanding how rearrangement at the
/
locus is regulated may be relevant to lineage commitment and
maintenance in general as well as to TCR gene rearrangement and
transcription in particular.
The
/
locus itself is huge, spanning approximately 1 megabase;
90% of the locus, the 5' region, contains the V
and
gene
segments, while a 100-kb 3' region contains (5' to 3') the D
, J
,
C
, J
, and C
segments 13, 14 . Sixty-one J
segments have
been identified in humans, and 59 closely related homologues are
present in the mouse 15, 16, 17 . Approximately 100 V
gene segments,
belonging to 20 distinct subfamilies, are dispersed in clusters, which
appear to have been created by duplication of a primordial block during
evolution 13, 14, 18 . Some V segments are used by both
ß and

T cells and are distributed throughout the locus, whereas four
bona fide V
segments are located at the 3' end of the
region;
one resides 3' of C
and, uniquely, rearranges by inversion rather
than excision of intervening sequence 19 .
Following VDJ
, rearrangement of the V
s to J
s occurs
sequentially from the most proximal to the most distal segments (3' to
5' in the V locus and 5' to 3' in the J 7, 20, 21 and continues until
a functional receptor is produced and the T cell is positively
selected; this event shuts down expression of at least two genes
required for rearrangement, RAG-1 and RAG-2 22, 23 . Early during ontogeny the repertoire is skewed, with most T cells
expressing
-chains composed of the more proximal 3' V
s and 5'
J
s; in adult mice the pattern changes, and all segments, including
the distal 5' V
s and 3' J
s, are used 24, 25, 26, 27 . This may be due to
differential regulation or simply time; adult thymocytes mature more
slowly (34 days vs 2 days) and hence have more time to undergo
secondary rearrangements 26 . Rearrangement is not random but appears
to occur in defined blocks, with discrete regions of the J
locus
being open at a given time. There is apparently no allelic exclusion at
the
locus, and both alleles rearrange simultaneously, usually to
the same region along the J
locus 28, 29, 30 . Two VJC
messages can
be transcribed, and in some cases both chains are expressed on the cell
surface 31, 32, 33 .
How is this complex process controlled? Although the same RAG-1- and
RAG-2-dependent, site-specific recombination mechanism is used for all
Ig and TCR rearrangements, each locus is clearly differentially
regulated. Alt and colleagues originally proposed that regulation of
the VDJ recombination is determined by accessibility; only genes with
chromatin in an accessible open configuration can serve as substrates
for recombination 34, 35, 36 . Accessibility is generally defined by
transcription, DNase hypersensitivity, and changes in DNA methylation.
Numerous cis regulatory elements apparently controlling
accessibility have been defined within the
/
locus. Among the
most important and well characterized are the
and
enhancers,
E
and E
.
E
lies between J
2 and C
and is highly conserved between man
and mouse 37, 38 , particularly binding sites for the transcription
factors c-Myb, CBF/PEBP2, and GATA-3. Analysis of a number of
transgenic mice carrying chromosomally integrated recombination
substrates has shown that a 1.4-kb fragment containing E
is required
for VD
to J
rearrangement, but not for V
to D
rearrangement. Paralleling normal T cell development, a
minilocus containing E
rearranges on approximately day 14.5 during
ontogeny. However, its activity is not lineage specific, as
E
+ substrates rearrange equally in 
and
ß T
cells 3, 39 . Located approximately 3 kb 3' of C
exon 4, E
(like
E
) is highly conserved between mouse and man 16, 40, 41 . Fragments
containing either the mouse or the human E
confer both correct
temporal and lineage-specific rearrangement patterns to artificial
minilocus rearrangement constructs in transgenic mice 3, 42 .
Production of mice in which a 1.1-kb fragment containing E
was
deleted using homologous recombination in ES cells unequivocally
demonstrated that E
is necessary for most V
-J
rearrangement
43 . More unexpectedly, it is also required for high level expression
of complete VDJC
transcripts as well as sterile germline transcripts
originating along the J
locus. Thus, remarkably, the E
exerts its
effects over a distance of 7080 kb.
Clearly, E
and E
play major roles in conferring accessibility at
the
/
locus. This is not without precedent, as deletion of the
TCR ß enhancer completely inhibits VDJß rearrangement 44, 45 , and
several enhancers are involved in rearrangement, class switching, and
expression at the Ig loci 36 . However, the problem of progressive
rearrangement remains: why isnt the entire locus open at once? One
definitive focusing element within the J
locus has been most
extensively characterized by de Villartay and colleagues. The
transcription early
(TEA) element resides just 5' of the J
s and
gives rise to sterile transcripts that are expressed during T cell
maturation just before V
gene rearrangement 9, 46, 47, 48 . Creation of
mice lacking a 2.3-kb fragment containing the TEA element has shown
that this element is required for rearrangement of V
s to the nine
most 5' J
s (J
53-J
61) 49 , demonstrating a direct relationship
between TEA transcription and accessibility to a particular block of
J
s. What controls accessibility of the J
s further downstream
remains an intriguing question. Numerous other sterile transcripts
originate along the locus, and some may fulfill this function 50 .
Of great interest in terms of further dissecting regulation at this
locus, the 100-kb 3' region containing C
-C
(including the entire
J
cluster) has been completely sequenced from both mouse and man
15, 17, 51 . Comparison revealed an extraordinary degree of
conservation (
71% similarity between the two) 16 . As noted by
Koop and Hood 16 , this contrasts sharply with comparisons made
between other large sequenced regions, including the ß-globin gene
cluster, the
crystalline gene cluster, the Ig µ/
constant gene
region, and the TCR ß V region, for which overall structure is not
highly conserved between species. The high degree of conservation
throughout the C
-C
region suggests that its overall structure is
critical, perhaps for correct regulation of rearrangement and
transcription. As expected, most of the previously identified
regulatory elements, including the
and
enhancers, are
conserved. Interestingly, numerous peaks of homology (90% and greater)
do not coincide with coding or known regulatory sequences and are
candidates for as yet unknown regulatory functions.
One of these blocks, designated a conserved sequence block (CSB), was
identified in initial comparisons of human and mouse genomic
/
sequences 15 . It was originally defined as a 232-bp fragment
containing a 125-bp segment with 95% homology and a 50-bp segment 90%
conserved, located approximately 5 kb 5' of C
exon 1 between J
3
and J
4. This degree of conservation is high even for this locus; for
comparison, the human and mouse E
s share 84% homology over 240 bp
(95% over a 50-bp region), and the E
s are 70% homologous over a
370-bp region (80% over a 30-bp region) 16 . In addition, zoo blot
analysis using the CSB as a probe suggests that this sequence may be
conserved in other vertebrates. Kuo et al. 52 have recently reported
evidence for possible regulatory functions of this block; when placed
in tandem with the C
enhancer, the 125-bp CSB fragment augmented
transcription around 2-fold in in vitro transfection assays, although
it had no effect on its own. Moreover, this fragment does contain
binding motifs for transcription factors known to be involved in
lymphoid differentiation, including GATA and PU.1, and differentially
binds factors from nuclear extracts, some of which appear to be
lymphoid and/or T cell specific.
Given these data, it seems plausible that this CSB may contribute to
regulation of the
/
locus at either the rearrangement or the
expression level. To assess this possibility in vivo, we have generated
mice in which a 394-bp fragment containing these blocks of homology is
either deleted or replaced with a neomycin resistance gene driven by
the phosphoglycerate kinase promoter (pgk-neor). Analysis
of these mice shows that deletion of this CSB does have a local effect
on J
usage, probably due to decreased transcription. In addition,
replacement of the CSB by pgk-neor has more dramatic
effects on J
usage that extend over 20 kb of the locus.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The sequence of the C
-C
region (GenBank accession no.
M64239) was used to design oligos (listed in Table I
) and the targeting construct.
clones containing the CSB region were obtained by screening a 129/Sv
genomic library (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with a PCR-generated
fragment containing C
exons 13. A 6.9-kb BamHI fragment
subcloned into pBluescript was used to replace a 394-bp
FokI-SacI fragment containing the CSB with the
pgk-neor gene flanked by loxP sites
(provided by Dr. P. Kastner, Institut de Génétique et de
Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Strasbourg, France). The
construct was either linearized with NotI or excised from
the plasmid with BamHI and purified by gel electrophoresis.
Fifteen to seventeen micrograms of the targeting construct was
electroporated into 1 x 107 E14 embryonic stem (ES)
cells 53 (provided by Dr. T. Miyazaki) with 400 V and 125 µF using
a Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA). After 2448 h cells were grown
in G-418 sulfate, and resistant clones were picked after 68 days.
Colonies were expanded in duplicate; one set was frozen in 24-well
plates, and the other was used to isolate DNA.
|
Cytofluorometric analysis
Anti-
(GL3)-FITC or -bio,
anti-CD4-phycoerythrin, anti-CD8-Cychrome, anti-V
2-FITC, and
anti-V
8-FITC were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA).
Anti-TCR ß (H57-597) 55 and anti-CD3
(KT3) 56 were
purified from culture supernatants and biotinylated or FITC conjugated.
Thymus, lymph node, and spleen cell suspensions were prepared and
stained essentially as described previously 57 . Cells were passed on
a FACScan, and data were analyzed using CellQuest software (Becton
Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).
DNA extraction, Southern blots
DNA was extracted from thymocyte cell suspensions, tail, kidney, and liver by proteinase K digestion (200 µg/ml in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 50 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, and 0.2 M NaCl) for 2448 h at 55°C followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. DNA was resuspended at 12 µg/µl in 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5) and 0.1 mM EDTA.
Quantitative Southern blots using probes distributed along the J
region were conducted essentially as described by Petrie et al. 7 .
Four probes distributed along the J
cluster were amplified using the
oligos described previously 7 and subcloned into pBluescript. Five to
ten micrograms of thymocyte and control DNA was digested with
BamHI and HindIII, run on 0.9% agarose gels, and
transferred to Zeta-Probe GT genomically tested blotting membranes
(Bio-Rad) in 0.4 N NaOH. Membranes were neutralized in 2x SSC,
prehybridized for 13 h, then hybridized with the four J
probes in
Expresshyb solution (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) for 312 h at 65°C.
Membranes were stripped by submerging in boiling 0.1% SDS in
H2O, then cooling to room temperature (twice). To normalize
signal intensity for each sample, membranes were rehybridized with
either a 300-bp fragment containing E
or a fragment spanning C
exons 3 and 4. Signal intensity was quantified using a PhosphorImager
with ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). The
percentage of remaining signal intensity for each J
probe was
determined using kidney, liver, or ES cell DNA as controls as follows:
[(signal intensity of J
probe for thymic DNA/signal intensity of
control probe for same sample)/(signal intensity of J
probe for
control tissue/signal intensity of control probe for same sample)] x
100.
Long range PCR (LR PCR)
Primers complementary to the initial 30 bp of a number of J
segments distributed along the locus were tested using thymocyte DNA as
a template with primers recognizing the V
3 and V
2 families (see
Table I
) using the Expand Long Template PCR System from Boehringer
Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN), essentially following the manufacturers
instructions. Briefly, each reaction contained 250 ng of thymocyte DNA
(diluted to 50 ng/µl in H2O and heated to 65°C for
0.5 h before use), 15 pmol of each primer, 500 mM of each dNTP,
0.25 µl of the Taq Pwo enzyme mix, and 1x buffer 3 (2.25 mM
MgCl2 with detergents) in a total volume of 50 µl.
Amplification was conducted in thin-walled PCR tubes (Boehringer
Mannheim) using the following conditions: 2 min at 93°C; 10 cycles of
93°C for 10 s, 65°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 12 min; 20
cycles of 93°C for 10 s, 65°C for 30 s, and 12 min for
68°C with a 20-s extension per cycle; and a final extension for 15
min at 68°C. A set of primers that consistently generated ladders of
fragments up to 10 kb and almost completely covered the J
locus was
used to amplify thymocyte DNA from CSB+/+,
CSBn/n, and CSB-/- mice. PCR products were
run on 1% agarose gels and transferred to Hybond N+
(Amersham) membranes, and each set was probed with a
[
-32P]ATP-labeled oligo specific for the J
immediately 5' to that used for the amplification (see Table I
).
Controls included DNA isolated from E14 ES cells and tail tissue.
Isolation of RNA, RT-PCR, and sequencing analysis
RNA was isolated from thymus and lymph nodes using LiCl/urea
essentially as described previously 58 , and cDNA was prepared from 2
µg of total thymus RNA using oligo(dT) and AMV reverse transcriptase
(Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). V
2,3 and 10 V-J-C fragments
were separately amplified using the V
and C
exon 3 primers listed
in Table I
. For allele-specific amplification, B6- and 129-specific
C
exon 4 oligos were used with the V
3 primer. Amplification was
conducted under standard conditions (1.5 mM MgCl2) using 5
µl of cDNA and 25 pmol of each primer in a 50-µl total volume:
94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30
s, and 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.
For sequencing, fragments were purified as described previously 59 ,
filled in with T4 DNA polymerase (Pharmacia), phosphorylated with T4
polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs, Beverley, MA) 60 , and
blunt-cloned into pBluescript that had been linearized with
EcoRV and dephosphorylated with calf intestinal phosphatase
(New England Biolabs). Minipreps were sequenced on an ABI 373XL DNA
sequencer (Perkin-Elmer/Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using ABI
PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kits with AmpliTaq
DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer) according to the manufacturers
instructions. Data were analyzed using ABI PRISM sequencing analysis,
Fractura, and Sequence Navigator software (all from Perkin-Elmer).
For blots, duplicate gels were prepared using 34 µl of the PCR
reaction/lane; DNA was transferred to Hybond N+ membranes
(Amersham), and each blot was sequentially probed with several of the
J
-specific oligos listed in Table I
, with the control C
exon 1
oligo to normalize signal intensity, and with the C
exon 2
129-specific oligo as a final control. Hybridizations were conducted at
5560°C, and blots were washed at high stringency for each oligo.
Between each hybridization, blots were stripped by incubating the
membranes at 50°C in 0.4 N NaOH and 2x SSC for 1 h, then
briefly submerged in boiling H2O/0.1% SDS and cooled to
room temperature. Stripping was confirmed by exposing the membranes to
film or PhosphorImager screen before rehybridization. In total, the
hybridization signal intensity for 29 J
-specific oligos was obtained
and quantitated using a PhosphorImager. Relative J
usage in mutant
mice was normalized to that in wild-type mice as follows: [(J
signal intensity from mutant mice/C
1 signal intensity from mutant
mice)/(J
signal intensity CSB+/+ mice/C
1 signal
intensity CSB+/+ mice)] x 100. Hybridization signals from
control 129 and B6 mice were included and also normalized to the
CSB+/+ animals. For allele-specific PCR, signal intensity
was normalized to the B6 allele: [(J
signal intensity 129
allele/C
1 signal intensity of 129 allele)/(J
signal intensity of
B6 allele/C
1 signal intensity of B6 allele)] x 100. (129 x
B6)F1 mice served as controls for this experiment.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The targeting construct included approximately 7 kb of homologous
sequence with the selectable marker (pgk-neor) flanked by
loxP sites (Fig. 1
). Mice generated with
this construct (designated CSBn/+) were intercrossed to
produce homozygotes (CSBn/n) or were bred to transgenic
mice expressing the cre recombinase under the CMV promoter
very early during embryogenesis 54 to delete the pgk-neor
gene and produce mice homozygous for the CSB deletion
(CSB-/-). All possible genotypes were analyzed in this
study, and breeding was conducted so that all mutant alleles
(CSBn or-) were 129/Ola-derived and wild-type
(W+) B6. Mice with and without the cre transgene
were included to ensure that cre expression created no
additional artifacts.
|
ß
or 
T cell development; numbers were similar to those in
CSB+/+ littermates, and peripheral cell surface expression
of at least two V
families (no. 2 and 8) was similar in mutant and
control mice. In all CSBn/n mice analyzed, however, fewer
DP thymocytes expressed intermediate levels of TCR ß (Fig. 2
with real V-JC
-chain, these data suggested that
-chain expression might be somewhat impaired in the
CSBn/n animals.
|
-J
rearrangement
Two methods that allow rearrangement along the J
locus to be
both quantitatively and qualitatively assessed were employed.
Initially, Southern blots prepared with thymocyte and control DNA were
hybridized with four probes that effectively divide the J
cluster
into equal regions 7 to assess the extent of rearrangement in adult
(>5 wk of age) mutant and W+ mice (Fig. 3
A). By normalizing the signal
intensity for each J
region probe, then comparing the normalized
signal intensity for each J
probe obtained using thymocyte DNA with
that from control tissue (kidney, liver, or E14 cells), the percentage
of control signal remaining in thymocyte DNA gives a quantitative
assessment of rearrangement along the locus. Because
rearrangement
is progressive, extensive rearrangement is observed at the 5' end of
the locus, whereas much less is evident at the most 3' end in normal
mice. By these criteria, rearrangement quite clearly occurred in all
types of mice, with progressive rearrangement observed along the J
cluster in CSB+/+ and CSB-/- mice (Fig. 3
B). In CSBn/n mice, however, the typical
progressive pattern was not as evident; rearrangement appeared to be
suppressed across the center portion of the J
cluster and overall
more focused toward the 3' quarter of the locus (flanking the CSB).
|
accessibility in a more qualitative manner, a LR PCR
assay was developed that allowed rearrangement to almost every J
within the cluster to be visualized. Primers specific for the V
2 and
V
3 families were tested with a series of primers distributed along
the J
locus, most homologous to the initial 30 bp of various J
s.
As indicated in Fig. 4
s are
designated according to Koop et al. 17 , numbered 61 to 1, moving 5'
to 3' along the locus (J
s 8 and 10 are not present in the mouse
16). Because the initial 35 bp of each J
is usually removed
during the rearrangement process, these oligos should not
preferentially amplify the very short V-J
primer fragment. A set of
primers was identified that consistently amplified ladders of up to 10
kb when using thymocyte DNA as template, but amplified nothing
with control E14 or tail DNA. PCR products were blotted and probed with
a labeled oligo specific for the adjacent 5' J
. In each case the
major bands corresponded to the sizes expected for 5' V-J products; in
addition, a blot prepared from products amplified using the primer
located between J
12 and J
13 was sequentially hybridized with
seven 5' J
probes to ensure that all bands represented the expected
V
-J
rearrangement (data not shown). Thymocyte DNA samples from
three CSB+/+, CSBn/n, and CSB-/-
mice were amplified with a V
3 primer and the J
primers shown in
Fig. 4
s was observed in this assay, and all were accessible in each type
of mouse. This experiment was repeated using a V
2 primer and
thymocyte DNA from CSB+/+ and CSBn/n mice;
again, no major differences were observed (data not shown).
|
usage
To assess total
-chain expression, Northern blots were
prepared using thymus and lymph node RNA. Comparison of TCR
with
ß message showed an approximate 40% decrease in total
message in
thymocytes from CSBn/n mice; however, lymph node expression
was similar in all three types of animals (data not shown).
To look at J
usage, we initially sequenced a large number of
V-J-C
fragments amplified from total thymus RNA isolated from
CSB+/+ and CSB-/- mice using primers for the
V
2, -3, and -10 families; this established the relative frequency of
J
usage in the two types of animals (Fig. 5
) and also allowed identification of
B6/129 polymorphisms. Of the 59 J
s identified in mice, at least 20
are probably pseudogenes. In line with this, we obtained sequences of
43 different J
s from CSB-/- and CSB+/+
mice, of which 12 were polymorphic. At least one of the apparent
differences in expression, that of J
23, is probably due to
polymorphism rather than manipulating the CSB: a single nucleotide
change in the J
23 sequenced from CSB-/- thymocytes
(derived from 129) introduces a stop codon in the 129 allele. This
probably accounts for the low frequency of this message in the
CSB-/- animals, as messages with stop or nonsense codons
are known to be strongly down-regulated in lymphocytes 61 . This
polymorphism was confirmed by sequencing J
23 amplified from E14 DNA
(the 129/Ola ES cell line from which the mice were derived).
|
23 expression, the overall
J
distributions obtained from the sequencing data (Fig. 5
usage between
W+ and mutant animals. To assess this in a number of
animals (as well as B6 and 129 controls to distinguish strain
differences) we used a semiquantitative assay based on that originally
described by Villey et al. 49 . For this analysis, we amplified V
2,
-3, and -10 VJC fragments from thymus RNA derived from five each of
CSB+/+, CSBn/n, CSBn/-, and
CSB-/- mice as well as two B6 and 129/Ola controls. PCR
products were run on duplicate gels and blotted, and membranes were
sequentially probed with several J
-specific oligos; in total,
expression of 29 J
s was assessed for each sample. Each blot was
probed with a C
1-specific oligo to normalize signal intensities and,
finally, with a C
2 129-specific oligo to ensure that all amplified
fragments were derived from the correct allele. A representative blot
is shown in Fig. 6
|
expression patterns were
quite similar, whereas 129/Ola mice had a distinct distribution,
mirroring that seen in the CSB-/- sequencing data. In
particular, J
23 expression was very low in all 129-derived samples.
In the CSB-/- animals, J
usage paralleled that seen in
129/Ola animals except for those J
segments flanking the CSB
deletion; expression of J
4 was diminished 2-fold in comparison with
that in B6 and 129 mice, and J
2 usage was similar to that in
W+ littermates but was less than that in the 129/Ola
controls. In contrast, replacement of the CSB with pgk-neor
had a dramatic effect on J
usage. In CSBn/n animals
there was a striking increase in J
2 usage. Intriguingly, J
4 usage
was normal, yet there was a profound decrease in expression in the
J
s immediately upstream. This suppression was most marked for J
5
and gradually tapered off over a 20-kb distance (upstream of J
26;
see Fig. 6
To confirm that these effects were imposed in cis, we
compared J
expression from W+ and mutant alleles within
heterozygote animals. B6 and 129-derived V
3-JC fragments were
separately amplified from thymus RNA isolated from three
CSBn/+ and three CSB-/+ mice using oligos
differentially hybridizing to a polymorphic segment of C
exon 4 (see
Table I
). For this experiment thymus RNA isolated from two wild-type
B6/129 F1 offspring of an E14 chimera generated for a
different study served as the control. As described above, duplicate
blots were sequentially probed with J
-specific oligos and controls.
Representative blots are shown in Fig. 6
B, and compiled data
are presented in Fig. 6
D; in this case normalized signal
intensities are expressed as a percentage of the B6 allele (seeMaterials and Methods).
Again, J
expression of the CSB- 129 allele was quite
similar to that of the W+ 129 allele from the E14/B6
control except for a 3540% reduction in J
4. Thus, deleting the
CSB does have a very local cis effect on expression of
flanking J
s, the most significant being the approximate 2-fold
decrease in expression of J
4, which lies 300 bp 5' to the deletion.
In addition, the CSBn 129 allele was clearly expressed very
differently from the B6 or W+ 129 allele, and the pattern
mirrored that seen in CSBn/n mice: a striking increase in
J
2 usage, normal expression of J
4, and a profound decrease in
expression in the J
s immediately upstream that gradually tapers off
over a 20-kb distance. These data confirmed that insertion of
pgk-neor acts in cis and affects J
expression
up to 20 kb along the locus. Because all the J
s within this 20-kb
region are clearly accessible (rearrangement to each of them was
evident in the LR PCR assay; Fig. 4
), much of this specific suppression
of J
usage probably occurs at the transcriptional level.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-J
rearrangement and expression. The 2-fold decrease in J
4
expression in CSB-/- mice is, however, very consistent
with the in vitro data indicating that the CSB augments E
activity
2-fold 52 . Our results suggest that the CSB may also augment E
activity in vivo, but only over a relatively short distance (300400
bp). The CSB may be one of several redundant regulatory elements, or
perhaps it primarily serves a structural role. Because this CSB is only
one of several highly conserved blocks along the locus, it is possible
that they collectively contribute to a specific chromatin structure.
Indeed, that the entire locus is highly conserved suggests that
maintaining a particular overall structure is essential. If this is the
case, deleting a single homology block would not be expected to (and
seemingly does not) have a major effect on the entire organization. In
this respect, the effects seen in the CSBn/n mice are quite
intriguing.
Merely inserting a resistance gene driven by any one of several
promoters into a locus can have dramatic effects on both transcription
and rearrangement 44, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 . Although this has been well documented
in several systems, the pgk-neor insertion at this locus
has allowed a more detailed analysis of these effects, which may help
define the underlying mechanism. Replacement of the CSB with
pgk-neor in opposite orientation to V-J
transcription
(so that it should not interfere directly with VJC
messages) does at
least two things: it introduces a constitutively open chromatin
configuration where the CSB normally resides, and it introduces the pgk
promoter, which may compete for transcription factors 62, 63, 67 .
Both could contribute to the results seen, but the most plausible
interpretation of our data is as follows.
1) The insertion of a constitutive promoter may focus more
rearrangement to the J
s immediately flanking it (in this case J
2
and J
4; J
3 and J
1 are pseudogenes); this is consistent with
the quantitative Southern blot data. In addition, because J
2 lies 3'
to the CSB, any rearrangement to J
2 will delete the CSB (or pgk-neo
insertion in CSBn mice); thus, the huge increase in J
2
usage observed on the CSBn allele must be due to increased
rearrangement rather than transcription. Notably, this insertion of
pgk-neor does not dramatically repress rearrangement along
the J
cluster, as has been observed in similar replacements of the
Ig
intronic and heavy chain enhancers 63, 64, 65, 66 .
2) J
4 lies within 300 bp of pgk-neor; because this
region is already in a transcriptionally active configuration,
expression of V
s rearranged to J
4 is efficient. However, just 2
kb upstream of the insertion, V
segments rearranged to J
5 (easily
detected in the LR PCR assay) are barely expressed, perhaps because
forming a transcriptionally open structure is inhibited by the
constitutively open pgk-neor downstream. This suppressive
effect extends for 20 kb along the locus (to J
26) and decreases with
distance from the pgk-neo insertion. Relative expression of J
s in
the region 5' to J
26 is normal. Interestingly, Fiering et al. noted
a very similar effect after replacing a DNase-hypersensitive site in
the ß-globin LCR with pgk-neor 67 . In this case,
transcription of the globin gene closest to pgk-neor
decreased 10-fold, and those further away decreased 2-fold. Although
competition was invoked as the most likely explanation for their
observations, it is difficult to interpret our results in the same way;
given the relatively high expression of V
s rearranged to J
4
immediately flanking the pgk-neor insertion, disruption of
the chromatin structure seems a more likely candidate for the
suppressive effects seen further upstream.
3) Suppressing expression of functional messages from J
265 in the
CSBn/n thymocytes probably forces even more rearrangement
to J
2 as thymocytes attempt to make a functional
-chain. Because
J
2 is apparently selected against (i.e., is detected at lower levels
in lymph node than in thymus RNA from W+ and mutant mice;
data not shown) the heavy reliance on this particular J
in the
CSBn/n mice may contribute to the inefficient T cell
maturation evident in the FACS analysis (Fig. 1
).
In summary, this CSB does not appear to play a major independent
regulatory role in the
/
locus. However, the high degree of
conservation of this locus remains intriguing, and it seems plausible
that the conserved sequence blocks along the locus do contribute to
regulation, perhaps by providing a structural context that helps guide
regulatory elements, including the enhancers and TEA. As the overall
structure appears to be more critical than individually conserved
elements, experiments designed to introduce specific structural changes
along the locus may be more informative than focusing on the roles of
individual conserved sequence blocks.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Susan Gilfillan, The Basel Institute for Immunology, Grenzacherstrasse 487, CH 4005 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DP, double positive; RAG, recombinase-activating gene; E
, T cell receptor
enhancer; E
, T cell receptor
enhancer; TEA, transcription early
; CSB, conserved sequence block; ES, embryonic stem; pgk-neor, neomycin resistance gene driven by the phosphoglycerate kinase promoter; B6, C57BL/6; LR PCR, long range PCR; W+, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication September 9, 1998. Accepted for publication December 17, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, ß,
, and
T cell antigen receptor genes arose early in vertebrate phylogeny. Immunity 6:1.[Medline]
/
gene rearrangement by T cell receptor
and
enhancers. J. Exp. Med. 179:1913.
ß and 
T cells can share a late common precursor. Curr. Biol. 5:659.[Medline]
selection events in 
cell development. Immunity 7:83.[Medline]
gene rearrangement and T early
(TEA) expression in immature
ß lineage thymocytes: implications for
ß/
lineage commitment. Immunity 4:37.[Medline]
-chain locus and elements responsible for its deletion are within the TCR
-chain locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:9694.
locus and expressed early in T-cell differentiation. Nature 327:677.[Medline]
/
locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:8166.
family. EMBO J. 9:2141.[Medline]
/
locus. Genomics 20:419.[Medline]
/C
region. Genomics 13:1209.[Medline]
/C
) region: organization, sequence, and evolution of 97.6 kb of DNA. Genomics 19:478.[Medline]
) gene segment most frequently utilized in adult thymocytes is 3' of the constant (C
) region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:8161.
/
locus. EMBO J. 8:3261.[Medline]
recombination contain in-frame rearrangements: evidence for continued V(D)J recombination in TCR+ thymocytes. Int. Immunol. 5:801.
genes in bone marrow T cell differentiation cultures. J. Immunol. 144:2829.[Abstract]
/ß and
/
T cell precursor. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:1939.[Medline]
gene segments: influence of V
and J
gene location. J. Immunol. 147:1075.[Abstract]
gene rearrangement in fetal and neonatal thymocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1892.[Medline]
gene rearrangements during T cell ontogeny skew to the 5' region of the J
locus. J. Immunol. 145:2347.[Abstract]
locus. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:107.[Medline]
chains: dual receptor T cells. Science 262:422.
and ß gene allelic exclusion during T-cell development. Immunol. Today 13:315.[Medline]
locus. Science 247:1225.
gene locus. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:807.[Medline]
transgene. J. Exp. Med. 179:43.
in the human T-cell receptor
locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:6714.
locus. EMBO J. 8:729.[Medline]
gene enhancers confer tissue- and stage-specificity on V(D)J recombination events. EMBO J. 12:4335.[Medline]
enhancer in
ß and 
T cells. Immunity 7:505.[Medline]
ß T-cell development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7877.
T-cell receptor deleting elements. New Biol. 1:266.[Medline]
joining region and temporal expression in ontogeny. Int. Immunol. 5:155.
-chain locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:8608.
following targeted deletion of T early
(TEA): implications for TCR
locus accessibility. Immunity 5:331.[Medline]
locus in its accessible configuration. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:1619.[Medline]
/
chain locus: strategy and methodology. Genomics 13:1198.[Medline]
region is a composite element that enhances TCR
enhancer activity and binds multiple nuclear factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3839.
ß T cell receptors. J. Immunol. 142:2736.[Abstract]
) versus Ig(
) B lymphocytes. Immunity 5:241.[Medline]
chain intron enhancer abolishes
chain gene rearrangement in cis but not
chain gene rearrangement in trans. EMBO J. 12:2329.[Medline]
light chain intronic enhancer/matrix attachment region impairs but does not abolish V
J
rearrangement. Immunity 4:377.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Xi and G. J. Kersh Sustained Early Growth Response Gene 3 Expression Inhibits the Survival of CD4/CD8 Double-Positive Thymocytes J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 340 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Yannoutsos, P. Wilson, W. Yu, H. T. Chen, A. Nussenzweig, H. Petrie, and M. C. Nussenzweig The Role of Recombination Activating Gene (RAG) Reinduction in Thymocyte Development in Vivo J. Exp. Med., August 20, 2001; 194(4): 471 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |