|
|
||||||||

*
Schering Plough, Laboratory for Immunological Research, Dardilly, France; and
DNAX Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA 94304
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another population of DC, termed germinal center DC (GCDC), has recently been identified within human GC 15 . This population is clearly distinct from FDC and TBM and was demonstrated to stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro 15 . The principles of DC-B cell collaboration have been shown in our previous studies using in vitro generated DC 16, 17, 18 . Their localization into the GC and their accessibility prompted us to investigate the possible contribution of GCDC in the follicular B cell response. We show that GCDC induce a strong expansion of GC B cells and skew their differentiation into plasmablasts in the presence of CD40 activation and cytokines such as IL-2 or IL-15. In addition, they were found to induce CD40-dependent isotype switching of naive B cells preferentially toward IgG1. Comparison of various DC subsets supports the idea that GCDC are specialized DC for the induction of B cell responses and identifies GCDC as a critical element of the GC reaction.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
rhGM-CSF (sp. act., 2.106 U/mg; Schering-Plough
Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ) was used at a saturating
concentration of 100 ng/ml (200 U/ml). rhTNF-
(sp. act., 2 x
107 U/mg; Genzyme, Boston, MA) was used at an optimal
concentration of 2.5 ng/ml (50 U/ml). rhSCF (sp. act., 4 x
105 U/mg; R&D Systems, Abington, U.K.) was used at an
optimal concentration of 25 ng/ml. rhIL-2 (sp. act., 3 x
106 U/mg; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) was used at 50 U/ml.
rhIL-15 (1 x 107 U/mg) was purchased from R&D Systems
and used at 10 ng/ml.
The following blocking Abs were used at 10 µg/ml: mouse anti-gp80 mAb (Diaclone, Besançon, France), goat anti-IL-12 (R&D Systems), mouse IgG1 anti-IL-12 mAb (clone C8.6, kindly provided by A. OGarra, DNAX, Palo Alto, CA), rat anti-hIL-10R mAb (clone 3F9), anti-hIL-10 mAb (clone 12G8, kindly provided by K. Moore, DNAX), mouse IgG1, and goat IgG isotype control Abs (R&D Systems).
The murine fibroblastic cell line stably transfected with human CD40
ligand (CD40-L L cells) was produced in the laboratory, as described
previously 19 . Mouse fibroblastic L cells transfected with the human
CD32/Fc
RII 20 were used as control-L cells.
In vitro generation of DC
CD34-derived DC were obtained as described earlier 18, 21, 22 . For most experiments, cells were routinely collected after 12 days of culture and labeled with FITC-conjugated anti-CD1a mAb (Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Raritan, NJ), and CD1a+ DC were isolated using a FACStarPlus cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). The procedure of staining and sorting was performed in the presence of 0.5 mM EDTA to avoid cell aggregation. Reanalysis of the sorted population showed a purity higher than 98%.
Monocyte-derived DC. Monocytes were purified from PBMC by centrifigation over a 50% Percoll and depletion of CD14- cells using anti-CD3 (OKT3), anti-CD8 (OKT8), anti-CD16 (Immunotech, Luminy, France), anti-CD19 (4G7), and anti-NKH1 (Coulter) Abs and bead depletion. Cells were routinely >90% CD14+. Monocytes were then cultured in presence of GM-CSF + IL-4 and used after 67 days to stimulate B cell proliferation. Monocyte-derived DC were generally >80% CD1a+.
Purification of GCDC and TBM from tonsils
GCDC were prepared as previously described 15 , with some modifications. Briefly, tonsils obtained from children undergoing tonsillectomy were finely minced and digested with collagenase IV and DNase. Cells collected after two rounds of enzymatic digestion were centrifuged through Ficoll-Hypaque with SRBC for 15 min at 500 rpm, then for 30 min at 2000 rpm. CD3+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, and CD14+ monocytes were removed from the resulting population by magnetic beads (anti-mouse Ig-coated Dynabeads; Dynal, Oslo, Norway). Anti-CD3 (OKT3), anti-CD19 (4G7), and anti-CD14 (MOP9) mAb were purified from ascites. A second depletion was performed with anti-NKH1 (Coulter, Hialeah, FL), anti-glycophorin A (Immunotech), and anti-CD20 (purified from ascites). The remaining cells were stained with the following mAbs: anti-CD1a FITC (Ortho Diagnostics Systems), anti-CD14 FITC, anti-CD57 FITC, anti-CD16 FITC, anti-CD7 FITC, anti-CD20 FITC, anti-CD3 FITC (Becton Dickinson), anti-CD11c PE (Becton Dickinson), and anti-CD4 PE-Cy5 (Immunotech). CD4+CD11c+CD3-CD20-CD1a- were isolated by cell sorting using a FACStarPlus (Becton Dickinson). An average of 2.1058.105 cells with >97% purity was obtained by this method.
TBM were isolated by cell sorting of large cells with strong autofluorescence. Cell purity was approximately 5080%, as judged by staining for nonspecific esterase and CD71, which expression on TBM is higher than on GCDC 15 .
Isolation of skin Langerhans cells (LC)
Epidermal cell suspensions were obtained from normal skin of
patients undergoing reconstitutive plastic surgery of breast or
abdomen, as described elsewhere 23 . LC enrichment was achieved
by successive density-gradient centrifugation steps and depletion of
basal keratinocytes. Further purification was obtained by positive
selection of CD1a+ cells using anti-CD1a mAb (OKT6;
Ortho Diagnostics), goat anti-mouse IgG-coated microbeads, and
Minimacs separation columns (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). The isolated
cells contained 9599% LC 24 . LC were then matured for 48 h in
presence of GM-CSF + TNF-
and used for cocultures after irradiation
(3000 rad).
Isolation of B cells
Mononuclear cells from tonsils were isolated by a standard Ficoll-Hypaque (density = .077 g/ml) gradient method. Tonsillar B cells were first enriched in the E- fraction and then submitted to anti-CD2, anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD14, anti-CD16 mAb negative selection with magnetic beads coated with anti-mouse IgG (Dynabeads; Dynal). In the isolated population (total B cells), >99% expressed CD19 and CD20 and <1% expressed CD2 or CD14. Isolation of sIgD+ naive B cells was performed using a preparative magnetic cell sorter (MACS; Miltenyi Biotec GmBH), as described elsewhere 25 , allowing >98% purity. GC B cells were first enriched by centrifigution over a 55% Percoll and depleted of IgD+ and CD39+ B cells using biotinylated anti-IgD (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and anti-CD39 Abs. This population was routinely >98%, as assessed by anti-CD38 or anti-CD10 FACS staining.
Cocultures of B cells and DC
Cultures were conducted in modified Iscoves medium, supplemented with 5% inactivated FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 0.08 µg/ml gentamicin (Schering-Plough, Levallois Perret, France). A total of 2.5 x 103 irradiated CD40L-L cells (7500 rad) was seeded together with 104 B lymphocytes (either GC or sIgD+ B cells) in the presence or the absence of 104 DC (irradiated 3000 rad) in 96-well culture plates 16 . B cell proliferation was monitored by tritiated thymidine ([3H]TdR) incorporation after 6 days of coculture, except for kinetic experiments. Cells were incubated for the last 16 h with 1 µCi of [3H]TdR. Experiments were conducted in triplicate, and results were expressed as cpm ± SD. For determination of Ig production, supernatants were recovered after 13 days and used for indirect ELISA 26 . ELISA specific for IgG subclasses was used as described in detail elsewhere 27 . The limits of sensitivity were 50, 90, 65, and 30 ng/ml for IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4, respectively. Phenotyping of the cultured cells was routinely performed using FITC-labeled anti-CD3, anti-CD19 (Immunotech), and FITC-labeled IgG1 (Kallestad, Austin, TX), and showed the absence of detectable contaminating T cells throughout the culture.
In other experiments, B cells and DC were cultured in separate compartments using transwells (Costar, Wilmington, MA). A total of 105 irradiated CD34-derived DC cultured in the presence or the absence of CD40 triggering (2.5 x 104 irradiated CD40L-L cells or CD32-L cells used as control) in the lower compartment (in a total volume of 0.8 ml) was assayed for their ability to stimulate growth and differentiation of 1.5 x 104 GC B cells activated by 3.75 x 103 CD40L-L cells in the upper compartment of the transwells (in a total volume of 0.15 ml). Measurement of DNA synthesis of B cells was performed by transferring, at day 6, the cells present in the top of the transwells into flat-bottom 96-well plates and pulsing them with [3H]TdR for the last 16 h of the culture period 18 .
For phenotypic studies, 105 GC B cells were cultured over 2.5 x 104 CD40L-L cells and IL-2, with or without 5 x 104 GCDC. Cultures were performed in 24-well culture plate in a total volume of 1 ml. For plasma cell formation study, cells were recovered after 8 days and processed for FACS staining using anti-CD20 FITC, anti-CD38 PE (Becton Dickinson), and anti-CD19 PE-Cy5 (Immunotech). The percentage of CD20-CD38high cells was analyzed on a FACS Calibur (Becton Dickinson) by gating on CD19+ B cells.
Giemsa and immunostainings
Cells recovered from 8 days coculture were cytocentrifuged for 5 min at 400 rpm on microscope slides and used for May-Gründwald-Giemsa staining. Double staining was performed using mouse IgG1 anti-CD11c, Ki67 (Dako, Carpenteria, CA), mouse IgG2a anti-CD71, and mouse IgG2b anti-CD11c (Becton Dickinson). Binding of mouse IgG1 was revealed by sheep anti-mouse IgG1 (The Binding Site, Birmingham, U.K.), followed by mouse antialkaline phosphatase-alkaline phosphatase complexes (Dako; APAAP technique). The binding of mouse IgG2a and IgG2b was revealed by sheep anti-mouse IgG2a-biotin or sheep anti-mouse IgG2b-biotin (The Binding Site), followed by Extravidin peroxidase (Sigma). Revelation of alkaline phosphatase activity was performed using Fast Blue substrate; peroxidase activity was indicated by 3-amino-ethylcarbazole.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A population of hemopoietic-derived DC, stimulating allogeneic T
cells, has recently been identified within B cell follicles 15 . As
illustrated in Fig. 1
A, GCDC
are evenly distributed in the GC and can be distinguished from TBM by
their weaker expression of CD71. To determine whether these DC could
have a direct role in GC B cell proliferation, GCDC were purified by
FACS sorting (Fig. 1
, B and C), according to
CD11c and CD4 expression 15 , and cultured with freshly isolated GC B
cells. In the absence of activation, no thymidine uptake by GC B cells
was detected whether or not GCDC were added to culture (data not
shown). Engagement of CD40 (by the use of CD40L-transfected L cells)
rescued GC B cells from apoptotic cell death and induced short-term low
DNA synthesis (Fig. 2
B). In
the various cytokines (IL-1 to IL-15) and combinations used, IL-4 +
IL-10, and to a lesser extent IL-2 + IL-10, gave the highest
stimulation of DNA synthesis by GC B cells cultured in presence of
CD40L-L cells for 6 days (Fig. 2
A). Addition of irradiated
GCDC modestly increased cytokine-independent proliferation of GC B
cells (mean increase 3.4, range 1.94.5, n = 10), but
their stimulatory effect was dramatically potentiated in the presence
of IL-2 or IL-15 (mean increase 13.5, range 5.924.1,
n = 10), two cytokines that have limited effects in the
absence of GCDC (Fig. 2
A). The combination of IL-2/IL-15 +
GCDC was as efficient as IL-4 + IL-10 in stimulating high rate of DNA
synthesis by GC B cells. Whatever the cytokine combination, addition of
GCDC induced a >threefold increase of GC B cell proliferation. As
illustrated in Fig. 2
C, the stimulatory effect of GCDC was
potentiated by IL-2 or IL-15 in a dose-dependent manner, maximal
stimulation being reached at 3 and 10 ng/ml for IL-2 and IL-15,
respectively. Kinetic studies showed that the stimulatory effect of
GCDC became detectable between day 2 and day 3 and was long lasting,
with a peak of B cell proliferation occurring after 6 to 8 days (Fig. 2
B). CD40 triggering, alone or in combination with IL-2 or
GCDC, did not allow significant B cell expansion, as illustrated by the
presence of sparse clusters of viable B cells after 6 days (Fig. 1
D) or direct enumeration using trypan blue dye exclusion
(Fig. 2
D). In contrast, addition of GCDC to
IL-2-supplemented cocultures dramatically enhanced both size and number
of clusters of viable cells (Fig. 1
E). In such clusters, the
majority of B cells in contact with GCDC express the
proliferation-associated nuclear Ag Ki67 (Fig. 1
G), as
observed in vivo in the GC dark zone (Fig. 1
F). A net
increase in viable cell numbers could be detected after 5 days in GC B
cells cultured with GCDC + IL-2 and reached maximum increase of 15-fold
at day 9 (Fig. 2
D).
|
|
Stimulation of B cell proliferation is restricted to specific DC subsets
Another set of experiments was then designed to determine whether
the strong stimulation of GC B cell proliferation observed with GCDC
was shared by other APC or was a particular feature of certain
populations of DC. For that purpose, increasing numbers of irradiated
APC, including DC either purified ex vivo or propagated in vitro
(freshly isolated GCDC, skin LC, monocyte-derived DC, and
CD34+ progenitor-derived DC), as well as non-DC cell types
(peripheral blood monocytes, EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines
(EBV-LCL), and a population enriched in TBM) were added to cocultures
of GC B cells and CD40L-L cells in the presence of IL-2 (Fig. 3
). Neither EBV-LCL nor peripheral blood
monocytes, nor TBM, even at high cell density, were able to induce
significant B cell proliferation (Fig. 3
, A and
B). In contrast, CD34-derived DC and monocyte-derived DC
shared with GCDC the capacity to trigger the proliferation of GC B
cells (Fig. 3
, A and C). Indeed, as few as 370
monocyte-derived DC induced a 4.4-fold increase in thymidine uptake,
and maximal stimulatory effect was reached with 3000 DC (12-fold
increase). Higher numbers of CD34-derived DC were usually required to
reach comparable levels of stimulation. Altogether, the above results
suggest that the stimulation of GC B cell growth is mainly restricted
to cells of the DC lineage.
|
Taken together, these results demonstrate that the capacity to induce the proliferation of GC B cells is restricted to GCDC and related populations of monocyte-derived DC (and CD14+-derived DC), and support the novel concept that GCDC directly participate in the GC reaction.
GCDC-biased GC B cell differentiation into plasma cells
The levels of IgG, IgA, and IgM in supernatants from coculture of
GC B cells and GCDC were analyzed at day 13 by ELISA. Results of Fig. 4
A show that GC B cells
activated solely by their CD40 without or with IL-2 produced marginal
amounts of Ig. Addition of GCDC to cultures significantly promoted IgG
secretion. Addition of IL-2 dramatically potentiated this secretion,
and to a much lesser extent that of IgA and IgM (Fig. 4
A).
The phenotype of B cells, cultured in presence or absence of GCDC, was
determined after 10 days, by triple-color staining using anti-CD20
FITC, anti-CD38 PE, and anti-CD19 PE-Cy5 Abs. As shown in Fig. 4
B, >40% of B cells recovered from GCDC-supplemented
cultures expressed the phenotype of plasma cells, e.g., high levels of
CD38 and down-regulated expression of CD20 28 . In contrast, in the
absence of GCDC, the majority of B cells still expressed CD20, but had
down-regulated CD38, a phenotype that has been ascribed to memory B
cells 29, 30 . Giemsa staining on isolated cells from 8 days of
coculture further confirms the classical morphology of plasma cells
(data not shown).
|
Role of soluble factors in GCDC-induced B cell proliferation and differentiation
The low number of GCDC recovered after purification from tonsils
was limiting for experiments aimed at elucidating the mechanism. As an
alternative, we used in vitro generated CD34-derived DC to perform
transwell experiments. Freshly isolated GC B cells were cultured in the
top well in the presence of CD40L-L cells. As expected, addition of DC
in the same compartment in the presence of IL-2 strongly stimulated B
cell proliferation (Fig. 5
A).
Culture of DC in the bottom well, in presence of CD40L-L cells or CD32
L cells, induced low but significant cytokine-independent B cell
proliferation (Fig. 5
A). In contrast, only CD40-activated DC
were able to reconstitute high levels of B cell proliferation in the
presence of IL-2. Thus, the strong capacity of DC to trigger B cell
proliferation is due to soluble molecules produced by DC upon CD40
stimulation. Analysis of Ig production in such transwell experiments
indicated a similar mechanism for DC-induced differentiation of B cells
(data not shown).
|
-chain only resulted in a modest
inhibition (6 and 19%, respectively). Furthermore, blocking IL-12
resulted in 80% inhibition of GCDC-induced GC B cell expansion (data
not shown). Indeed, as observed with CD34-derived DC 16 ,
CD40-activated GCDC produced low but significant levels of IL-12 p70
(17.8 ± 6 pg/ml, range 10.425.7, n = 3).
Nevertheless, a combination of IL-2 + IL-12 was not sufficient to
stimulate CD40-induced proliferation of GC B cells (data not shown),
suggesting the participation of other GCDC-derived molecules, as yet
not identified. GCDC induce isotype switching of naive B lymphocytes
In addition to the high rate of B cell proliferation, GC are the
major site of isotype switch in human tonsils 7 . To analyze the
possible contribution of GCDC to such events, highly purified tonsillar
naive B cells were cultured in presence of CD40L-L cells with or
without GCDC, and Ig productions were determined after 13 days of
coculture. As illustrated in Fig. 6
,
CD40-activated naive B cells produced only marginal amounts of Ig,
whether or not IL-2 was added. Addition of IL-10 to such cultures
induced naive B cells to produce high levels of IgM (9.2 µg/ml), IgG
(8.0 µg/ml), and to a lesser extent IgA, in agreement with previous
reports on the role of IL-10 as a switch factor 31, 32 . In addition
to triggering IgM secretion, GCDC induced secretion of significant
amounts of IgG by naive B cells (Fig. 6
A) that were enhanced
in IL-2-supplemented cultures (1.2 µg/ml versus 4.77 µg/ml in the
presence of IL-2). These levels of IgG production by CD40-activated
naive B cells are comparable with that induced by the known switch
factor IL-10 (Fig. 6
A). In contrast, IgA production induced
by IL-2 + GCDC remained marginal (Fig. 6
B). Analysis of IgG
subclasses indicates that GCDC induced naive B cells to produce high
amounts of IgG1 and low levels of IgG3, whereas IgG2 and IgG4 were
never detected (Table I
). While exogenous
IL-10 induced naive B cells to secrete comparable amounts of IgG1 and
IgG3 (Table I
and 31), GCDC preferentially induce naive B cells to
switch toward IgG1 (93 ± 6% of total IgG secretion, range
84100%, n = 7). Furthermore, the possible
contribution of endogenous IL-10, produced by both DC 33 and B cells
34 , was excluded by the fact that blocking anti-IL-10R Abs did
not result in any significant inhibition of DC-dependent Ig production
by naive B cells (Table I
).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dramatic effect observed on B cell growth leads to the hypothesis that GCDC may have an important role in vivo in sustaining the proliferation of centroblasts within the dark zone. The presence of GCDC within the dark zone in contact with Ki67+ GC B cells 15 would support this hypothesis. This study underlines the critical role of IL-2 for DC-dependent B cell growth and differentiation. This observation is consistent with two previous studies indicating that GC-T cells contained detectable IL-2 mRNA 36, 37 . Along with this, an IL-2-dependent pathway of development for GC B cells has been described 38, 39 . Interestingly, CD40-activated naive B cells as well as GC B cells express transiently CD25, whereas addition of DC was found to maintain CD25 expression at high levels throughout the culture period. In the presence of IL-2, those effects are further enhanced (unpublished observations). The present results, together with the fact that GCDC are found in close contact with T cells in situ 15 , would be consistent with this hypothesis and provide a cellular basis for stimulation of centroblast growth during the GC reaction. Furthermore, the requirement for CD40 activation is consistent with studies performed in mice showing that Abs to CD40L can abrogate an ongoing GC reaction 40, 41 . Nevertheless, the rare T cells present within GC were shown to be mainly restricted to the light zone 14 , challenging the hypothesis that GCDC and B cells receive activation from surrounding T cells. Several hypotheses can be advanced to reconcile our present culture system with the signals GCDC and B cells may encounter in vivo. 1) As GC B cells originate from precursors activated in the T zone, it is not unlikely that CD40 signaling may occur in vivo before entry into the follicle. 2) Besides activated T cells, the source of CD40L could be provided by B lymphocytes or DC, as proposed by others 42, 43, 44 . 3) It is also possible that in vivo, signals other than CD40-CD40L engagement may confer the B cell stimulatory capacity to GCDC. Indeed, distinct cytokines are secreted by DC activated either through CD40 or PMA and ionomycin 33, 45, 46, 47 , suggesting alternative signals that activate DC and that remain to be identified. In this context, members of the TNF/TNFR family, such as OX40 ligand or the recently identified RANK/TRANCE-R 48, 49 , are potential candidates.
In addition, GCDC may play a role in B cell activation in the light zone of GC. After proliferating in the dark zone, centroblasts give rise to noncycling centrocytes that are subjected to selection based on their affinity for Ag held on FDC and then develop into either memory cells or plasma cells. The present study demonstrates that GCDC strongly potentiate Ig synthesis by GC B cells, corresponding to a massive differentiation of B cells into plasma cells. This observation is consistent with the in vivo detection that some GC B cells directly differentiate into plasmablasts within GC 35, 50 . Several considerations also suggest reentry of selected centrocytes in the dark zone for further rounds of proliferation, ensuring emergence of high affinity cell clones 40, 51 . Altogether, these results suggest that within the light zone of GC, DC may directly contribute to further expansion of positively selected centrocytes and orient their differentiation toward plasma cells, thus allowing a rapid and efficient production of Abs required to neutralize invading pathogens.
Our present data suggest that GCDC may not only be involved in the proliferation of GC B cells, but also in the activation of naive B cells, as was initially observed with in vitro generated DC 16, 17 . Indeed, GCDC as well as blood CD11c+ DC can induce naive B cells to differentiate into plasma cells secreting high levels of IgM in the presence of IL-2. Strikingly, these DC also triggered preferential isotype switching of naive B cells toward IgG1 in the presence of CD40L and IL-2. Our results together with a recent report in relB-deficient mice 52 suggest that DC may provide key signals to naive B cells, allowing isotype switching toward IgG1. Interestingly, this GCDC-dependent isotype switching was not inhibited by blocking endogenous IL-10, suggesting that GCDC might produce alternative IgG1 switch factors.
The identification of the molecules involved in GCDC-dependent B cell activation could give key information as to the factors that control B cell proliferation within GC. Characterization of GCDC-stimulatory activity using transwells indicated that the effect is caused by soluble molecules, the production of which requires CD40 triggering. Ex vivo purified GCDC were recently shown to produce mRNA for IL-7, IL-10, and IL-13 33 , each of those cytokines being able to stimulate B cells 53, 54, 55 . Nevertheless, their possible contribution to GCDC-dependent B cell activation was ruled out by the use of blocking Abs (data not shown). Interestingly, anti-IL-12 Abs strongly inhibited GCDC-dependent GC B cell growth (59% inhibition) and Ig secretion (>80%). Indeed, CD40-activated GCDC produced detectable bioactive IL-12. In line with this, in situ hybridization for IL-12 p35 and p40 in mice suggests the existence of rare GC cells expressing mRNA for both chains of IL-12 56 . Nevertheless, a combination of IL-2 + IL-12 was not sufficient to reconstitute the stimulatory activity of GCDC, suggesting the contribution of other DC products, the identification of which could contribute to a better understanding of the regulation of the follicular B cell response.
Recent investigation indicates that DC are of diverse origin, as illustrated by the description of at least two types of myeloid precursors in humans 21, 57, 58 and the description of a lymphoid pathway of differentiation in mice 59 and possibly in humans 60 . These observations, together with the identification of different populations of DC within secondary lymphoid organs, such as spleen 61 , lymph nodes 62 , Peyers patches 63 , and tonsils 15, 64 , lead to the emerging idea that DC subsets may have different specialized functions. By comparing different ex vivo purified DC subsets as well as various populations of DC generated in vitro, we identified clear functional differences in their capacity to stimulate B cell responses. Tonsillar GCDC, blood CD4+CD11c+ DC, in vitro monocyte-derived DC, or the related CD14-intermediate derived DC had a strong capacity to trigger GC B cell proliferation, whereas LC or the in vitro related CD1a-intermediate derived DC displayed little, if any, B cell stimulatory activity. These observations suggest that the stimulation of B cell responses may be a particular feature of GCDC and related cells. The presence of GCDC within primary follicles in the spleen 15 , and the fact that they display a phenotype similar to CD4+CD11c+ blood DC 65 suggest that DC originating from blood colonize primary follicles. In line with this, migration of cells with dendritic morphology from the subcapsular sinus into the B cell follicles has been described in mice, in the first few days after Ag injection 66 . The identification of the migratory pathway of DC homing within B cell follicles will be of critical interest to better appreciate their potential role in the development of the humoral response. Because GCDC have been shown to carry immune complexes 15 , it is tempting to speculate that they could correspond to the Ag-transporting cells described by Szakal et al. 15 yr ago 67 . The above considerations together with the present data suggest that GCDC constitute a particular subset of DC specialized in the induction of humoral response.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Francine Brière, Schering Plough, Laboratory for Immunological Research, 27 chemin des Peupliers, BP 11, 69571 Dardilly, France. E-mail address: ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: GC, germinal center; CD40L, CD40 ligand; DC, dendritic cell; FDC, follicular DC; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage CSF; h, human; LC, Langerhans cell; LCL, lymphoblastoid cell line; PE, phycoerythrin; TBM, tingible body macrophages. ![]()
Received for publication September 15, 1998. Accepted for publication December 16, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. J. Exp. Med. 184:695.
cooperate in the generation of dendritic Langerhans cells. Nature 360:258.[Medline]
IgG1 switch in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:516.[Medline]
. P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli, ed. Dendritic Cells in Fundamental and Clinical Immunology 21. Plenum Press, New York.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. L. McGaha, M. C. I. Karlsson, and J. V. Ravetch Fc{gamma}RIIB Deficiency Leads to Autoimmunity and a Defective Response to Apoptosis in Mrl-MpJ Mice J. Immunol., April 15, 2008; 180(8): 5670 - 5679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kunz, K. Oberle, A. Sander, C. Bogdan, and U. Schleicher Lymphadenopathy in a Novel Mouse Model of Bartonella-Induced Cat Scratch Disease Results from Lymphocyte Immigration and Proliferation and Is Regulated by Interferon-{alpha}/{beta} Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2008; 172(4): 1005 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-W. Eijgenraam, S. M. Reinartz, S. W. A. Kamerling, V. J. van Ham, K. Zuidwijk, C. M. van Drunen, M. R. Daha, W. J. Fokkens, and C. van Kooten Immuno-histological analysis of dendritic cells in nasal biopsies of IgA nephropathy patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 612 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hansell, X. W. Zhu, H. Brooks, M. Sheppard, S. Withanage, D. Maskell, and I. McConnell Unique Features and Distribution of the Chicken CD83+ Cell J. Immunol., October 15, 2007; 179(8): 5117 - 5125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ostrowski, M. Vermeulen, O. Zabal, P. I. Zamorano, A. M. Sadir, J. R. Geffner, and O. J. Lopez The Early Protective Thymus-Independent Antibody Response to Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Is Mediated by Splenic CD9+ B Lymphocytes J. Virol., September 1, 2007; 81(17): 9357 - 9367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Mueller, C. Boix, W.-H. Kwan, C. Daussy, E. Fournier, W. H. Fridman, and T. J. Molina Critical role of monocytes to support normal B cell and diffuse large B cell lymphoma survival and proliferation J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 82(3): 567 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Bahlis, A. M. King, D. Kolonias, L. M. Carlson, H. Y. Liu, M. A. Hussein, H. R. Terebelo, G. E. Byrne Jr, B. L. Levine, L. H. Boise, et al. CD28-mediated regulation of multiple myeloma cell proliferation and survival Blood, June 1, 2007; 109(11): 5002 - 5010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Hatterer, N. Davoust, M. Didier-Bazes, C. Vuaillat, C. Malcus, M.-F. Belin, and S. Nataf How to drain without lymphatics? Dendritic cells migrate from the cerebrospinal fluid to the B-cell follicles of cervical lymph nodes Blood, January 15, 2006; 107(2): 806 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-J. Goval, R. Greimers, J. Boniver, and L. de Leval Germinal Center Dendritic Cells Express More ICAM-1 Than Extrafollicular Dendritic Cells and ICAM-1/LFA-1 Interactions are Involved in the Capacity of Dendritic Cells to Induce PBMCs Proliferation J. Histochem. Cytochem., January 1, 2006; 54(1): 75 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rossi and J. W. Young Human Dendritic Cells: Potent Antigen-Presenting Cells at the Crossroads of Innate and Adaptive Immunity J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1373 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Schutyser, A. Richmond, and J. Van Damme Involvement of CC chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) in normal and pathological processes J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2005; 78(1): 14 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Jackson and J. D. Capra IgH V-Region Sequence Does Not Predict the Survival Fate of Human Germinal Center B Cells J. Immunol., March 1, 2005; 174(5): 2805 - 2813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ratzinger, J. Baggers, M. A. de Cos, J. Yuan, T. Dao, J. L. Reagan, C. Munz, G. Heller, and J. W. Young Mature Human Langerhans Cells Derived from CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitors Stimulate Greater Cytolytic T Lymphocyte Activity in the Absence of Bioactive IL-12p70, by Either Single Peptide Presentation or Cross-Priming, Than Do Dermal-Interstitial or Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells J. Immunol., August 15, 2004; 173(4): 2780 - 2791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Poeck, M. Wagner, J. Battiany, S. Rothenfusser, D. Wellisch, V. Hornung, B. Jahrsdorfer, T. Giese, S. Endres, and G. Hartmann Plasmacytoid dendritic cells, antigen, and CpG-C license human B cells for plasma cell differentiation and immunoglobulin production in the absence of T-cell help Blood, April 15, 2004; 103(8): 3058 - 3064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Craxton, D. Magaletti, E. J. Ryan, and E. A. Clark Macrophage- and dendritic cell--dependent regulation of human B-cell proliferation requires the TNF family ligand BAFF Blood, June 1, 2003; 101(11): 4464 - 4471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Tangye, A. Ferguson, D. T. Avery, C. S. Ma, and P. D. Hodgkin Isotype Switching by Human B Cells Is Division-Associated and Regulated by Cytokines J. Immunol., October 15, 2002; 169(8): 4298 - 4306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-T. Wu and S. T. Hwang CXCR5-Transduced Bone Marrow-Derived Dendritic Cells Traffic to B Cell Zones of Lymph Nodes and Modify Antigen-Specific Immune Responses J. Immunol., May 15, 2002; 168(10): 5096 - 5102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Lipscomb and B. J. Masten Dendritic Cells: Immune Regulators in Health and Disease Physiol Rev, January 1, 2002; 82(1): 97 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Dieu-Nosjean, C. Massacrier, B. Vanbervliet, W.-H. Fridman, and C. Caux IL-10 Induces CCR6 Expression During Langerhans Cell Development While IL-4 and IFN-{gamma} Suppress It J. Immunol., November 15, 2001; 167(10): 5594 - 5602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. F. Mueller, I. Cremer, P. E. Paulet, S. Niida, N. Maeda, S. Lebeque, W. H. Fridman, and C. Sautes-Fridman Mannose Receptor Ligand-Positive Cells Express the Metalloprotease Decysin in the B Cell Follicle J. Immunol., November 1, 2001; 167(9): 5052 - 5060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Dubois, C. Massacrier, and C. Caux Selective attraction of naive and memory B cells by dendritic cells J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2001; 70(4): 633 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lindhout, J. L. M. Vissers, F. C. Hartgers, R. J. F. Huijbens, N. M. Scharenborg, C. G. Figdor, and G. J. Adema The Dendritic Cell-Specific CC-Chemokine DC-CK1 Is Expressed by Germinal Center Dendritic Cells and Attracts CD38-Negative Mantle Zone B Lymphocytes J. Immunol., March 1, 2001; 166(5): 3284 - 3289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Nardelli, O. Belvedere, V. Roschke, P. A. Moore, H. S. Olsen, T. S. Migone, S. Sosnovtseva, J. A. Carrell, P. Feng, J. G. Giri, et al. Synthesis and release of B-lymphocyte stimulator from myeloid cells Blood, January 1, 2001; 97(1): 198 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Dieu-Nosjean, C. Massacrier, B. Homey, B. Vanbervliet, J.-J. Pin, A. Vicari, S. Lebecque, C. Dezutter-Dambuyant, D. Schmitt, A. Zlotnik, et al. Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 3{alpha} Is Expressed at Inflamed Epithelial Surfaces and Is the Most Potent Chemokine Known in Attracting Langerhans Cell Precursors J. Exp. Med., September 5, 2000; 192(5): 705 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kaser, S. Dunzendorfer, F. A. Offner, O. Ludwiczek, B. Enrich, R. O. Koch, W. W. Cruikshank, C. J. Wiedermann, and H. Tilg B Lymphocyte-Derived IL-16 Attracts Dendritic Cells and Th Cells J. Immunol., September 1, 2000; 165(5): 2474 - 2480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Santini, C. Lapenta, M. Logozzi, S. Parlato, M. Spada, T. Di Pucchio, and F. Belardelli Type I Interferon as a Powerful Adjuvant for Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cell Development and Activity in Vitro and in Hu-Pbl-Scid Mice J. Exp. Med., May 15, 2000; 191(10): 1777 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Homey, W. Wang, H. Soto, M. E. Buchanan, A. Wiesenborn, D. Catron, A. Muller, T. K. McClanahan, M.-C. Dieu-Nosjean, R. Orozco, et al. Cutting Edge: The Orphan Chemokine Receptor G Protein-Coupled Receptor-2 (GPR-2, CCR10) Binds the Skin-Associated Chemokine CCL27 (CTACK/ALP/ILC) J. Immunol., April 1, 2000; 164(7): 3465 - 3470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Arias, J. E. Rey Nores, N. Vita, F. Stelter, L. K. Borysiewicz, P. Ferrara, and M. O. Labeta Cutting Edge: Human B Cell Function Is Regulated by Interaction with Soluble CD14: Opposite Effects on IgG1 and IgE Production J. Immunol., April 1, 2000; 164(7): 3480 - 3486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Crowley, C. R. Reilly, and D. Lo Influence of Lymphocytes on the Presence and Organization of Dendritic Cell Subsets in the Spleen J. Immunol., November 1, 1999; 163(9): 4894 - 4900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |