|
|
||||||||
Fujisaki Institute, Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Okayama, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
after secondary stimulation
with C57BL/6 spleen cells or anti-CD3 mAb, and exhibited strong
allospecific CTL activity. Neither IL-18 nor IL-18-supplemented culture
supernatants from DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC induced type I
CD8+ effector T cells when purified CD8+ T
cells were used as responder cells in primary MLC. Furthermore,
CD4+ T cell depletion from the responder cells abrogated
the IL-18-induced increase in secondary IFN-
production by
CD8+ T cells, suggesting that IL-18-induced type I effector
CD8+ T cell development was CD4+ T cell
dependent. In marked contrast, adding IL-12 to primary MLC decreased
CD8/CD4 ratios by 50% and suppressed secondary IFN-
production and
CTL activity by CD8+ T cells regardless of concentration,
whereas Th1 development was promoted by IL-12. Moreover, both IL-12 and
IL-18 efficiently induced type I CD8+ effector T cells in
C57BL/6 anti-BDF1 MLC. These findings show that IL-18
plays an important role in the generation of type I CD8+
effector T cells, and further suggest that functional maturation of
CD8+ T cells is differentially regulated by IL-18 and
IL-12. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-inducing activity on T cells and NK cells
1, 2 . Besides its IFN-
-inducing activity, IL-18 has been shown to
augment NK cell activity and to induce the proliferation of T cells.
The effects of IL-18 on the activation of murine CD4+ T
cells committed to the Th1 or Th2 responses have been investigated 3 .
IL-18 serves as a costimulatory factor for Th1 clones stimulated with
Ag on Ag-presenting B cells, immobilized anti-CD3 mAb, Con A, or
IL-2 to augment IFN-
production and to induce the IL-2R
-chain
expression and proliferation of the Th1 clones. However, IL-18 has
little or no effect on the type II cytokine production and
proliferation of Th2 clones stimulated with anti-CD3 mAb or Ag.
These functions are similar to those of IL-12 4, 5 , although IL-18
and IL-12 are completely different molecules in terms of their primary
structures, receptor binding, and signal transduction pathways 6 .
Interestingly, IL-18 and IL-12 together exert a synergistic effect on
IFN-
production by Th1 cells 3, 7, 8 . IL-18, as well as IL-12, is
released endogenously through interaction between Th1 cells and APCs in
the presence of specific Ags 3, 9 . Furthermore, it has been shown
that IL-18, unlike IL-12, does not drive Th1 development, but
potentiates IL-12-driven Th1 development 6, 10 . These results suggest
that both IL-18 and IL-12 are required for significant expression of
the Th1 phenotype, and they further imply that IL-18, by itself or in
concert with IL-12, plays an important role in the regulation of
Th1-type immune responses.
In spite of extensive investigation concerning the effects of IL-18 on
the activation and differentiation of CD4+ T cells, few
studies regarding the effects of IL-18 on the activation of
CD8+ T cells are found in the literature. Recently, Tomura
et al. showed that CD8+ T cells stimulated with
anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 mAbs in the presence of IL-12 exhibited
higher levels of IL-1R-related protein (a component of the IL-18R)
expression and IFN-
production than CD4+ T cells 11 .
However, it remains unclear whether IL-18 induces the development of
CD8+ T cells into effector CTLs under physiologic
conditions. Understanding the factors generating a Tc1-type, as well as
Th1-type, immune response could lead to therapeutic approaches for
infectious disease, allergy, neoplasia, and systemic autoimmune
disease.
In a manner similar to CD4+ T cell subsets, it has been
established that CD8+ effector T cell subsets can be
divided into Tc1 and Tc2 subsets on the basis of their cytokine
secretion profiles upon Ag stimulation 12, 13 . Tc1-type cells
preferentially secret the type I cytokines, IFN-
and IL-2, whereas
Tc2-type cells secret the type II cytokines, IL-4 and IL-10. Both Tc1
and Tc2 subsets possess cytolytic function in vitro 12, 14 . It is
well known that IL-12 induces the Tc1 development of naive
CD8+ T cells and potentiates the cytotoxic activity of CTLs
15, 16, 17 .
To determine the effect of IL-18 on the generation of CD8+ effector T cells, we investigated whether exogenous IL-18 is able to activate CD8+ T cells in MLC. Responder spleen cells from DBA/2 mice were cultured with mitomycin C-treated stimulator spleen cells from BDF1 mice (DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC). The results were compared with those obtained from MLC supplemented with IL-12. It is well known that the injection of DBA/2 spleen cells into BDF1 mice causes chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD)2 characterized by B cell hyperactivation, auto-Ab formation, and lupus-like disease 18 . On the other hand, the injection of C57BL/6 spleen cells into BDF1 mice results in acute GVHD characterized by augmented anti-host (BDF1) CTL activity and subsequent immunodeficiency 18, 19 . Importantly, donor anti-host CTLs are not detected in mice with chronic GVHD. Moreover, spleen cells from DBA/2 mice show a ninefold lower anti-BDF1 CTL activity and a twofold lower number of CD8+ T cells than C57BL/6 mouse spleen cells 20 .
We report in this study that IL-18 efficiently induces the development
of type I CD8+ effector T cells with strong CTL activity
via a CD4+ T cell-dependent pathway in DBA/2
anti-BDF1 MLC. In marked contrast, IL-12 suppressed the
maturation of CD8+ T cells to IFN-
-producing CTLs,
whereas it promoted the maturation of IFN-
-producing
CD4+ effector T cells. However, both IL-18 and IL-12
efficiently induced the development of type I CD8+ effector
T cells in C57BL/6 anti-BDF1 MLC. These findings
indicate that IL-18 plays an important role in the development of
CD8+ effector T cells, and further provide evidence for
differential regulation of CD8+ effector T cell development
between IL-18 and IL-12.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DBA/2J (H-2d), C57BL/6 (H-2b), and BDF1 (H-2b/d) mice were obtained from Charles River Japan (Kanagawa, Japan). Females, aged 24 mo, were used throughout these experiments.
Medium
The culture medium used in these experiments was RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), 60 µg/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin.
Cytokines and Abs
Murine rIL-18 was generated by expression in Escherichia
coli and purification, as previously described 1, 3 . The purity
of the rIL-18 was >95%, as verified by SDS-PAGE analysis, and the
endotoxin content was <1 ng/mg, as measured by Limulus
amebocyte lysate assay. Murine rIL-12 was expressed in Chinese hamster
ovary cells cotransfected with rIL-12 p35 and p40 cDNAs. The cytokine
was purified from the supernatants of the Chinese hamster ovary
cultures by chromatography. The sp. act. of IL-12 was 5.5 x
106 U/mg, as determined by the induction of IFN-
production by murine spleen cells 3 . SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that
the IL-12 was >95% pure, and the endotoxin content was <30 ng/mg.
Human rIL-2 was purchased from Genzyme (Boston, MA).
Hamster anti-mouse CD3
mAb (145-2C11) and biotinylated
anti-CD3 mAb were purchased from Cedarlane Laboratories Limited
(Ontario, Canada). Rat anti-mouse IL-2R
-chain mAb (3C7), rat
anti-mouse CD8a mAb (53-6.7), and anti-mouse I-Ad
mAb (AMS-32.1) were purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA).
Anti-L3T4 mAb (GK1.5) was obtained from Becton Dickinson (San Jose,
CA). Goat anti-rat IgG (nonreactive with mouse IgG) and goat
anti-mouse IgG were purchased from Cappel (Aurora, OH). Rabbit
anti-mouse IFN-
polyclonal Ab (pAb) was prepared in our
laboratory and used as a purified IgG fraction 21 . The neutralizing
activity of rabbit anti-mouse IFN-
pAb was 5.94 x
104 neutralizing U/mg. Rabbit anti-Cryj II pAb (Abs
against Japanese cedar pollen allergen, Cryj II) was prepared in our
laboratory and used as an isotype-matched control for rabbit
anti-mouse IFN-
pAb. Sandwich ELISAs were used to determine
IFN-
and IL-10 levels. The Abs for plate coating and the
biotinylated secondary mAbs were as follows: for IFN-
, rabbit
anti-mouse IFN-
pAb and biotinylated rat anti-mouse IFN-
mAb (XMG1.2; PharMingen); for IL-10, rat anti-mouse IL-10 mAb
(JES5-2A5; PharMingen) and biotinylated anti-mouse IL-10 mAb
(SXC-1; PharMingen).
Purification of CD8+ T cells
Purification of CD8+ T cells was conducted as follows. To remove dendritic cells and macrophages, single cell suspensions from DBA/2 mouse spleens were incubated for 1 h at 37°C on a FCS-coated plastic plate. After incubation, nonadherent cells were recovered by washing the surface of the plate with medium. To remove B cells, recovered nonadherent cells were incubated with anti-mouse I-Ad mAb for 30 min on ice, washed twice, and seeded on a goat anti-mouse Ig-coated plate for 1 h at 4°C, and then the nonadherent cells were recovered by gentle washing. To recover CD8+ T cells by positive selection, nonadherent cells were incubated with rat anti-mouse CD8 mAb for 30 min on ice, washed twice, and seeded on a goat anti-rat IgG-coated plate for 1 h at 4°C. After the incubation period, nonadherent cells were removed by gentle washing. The remaining adherent CD8+ T cells were incubated in culture medium at 37°C overnight. During this incubation, the cells detached from the plate. Purified CD8+ T cells were washed twice and used for primary MLC as responder cells. The purity of the resulting purified CD8+ T cells (8590%) was determined by flow cytometry before each experiment (CD4+, <2%). In some experiments, CD8+ T cells (>85%) were purified by negative selection. Briefly, CD8+ T cells were prepared from anti-L3T4 mAb-injected DBA/2 spleen cells passed through a nylon wool column, followed by depletion of B cells using anti-I-Ad mAb and goat anti-mouse Igs.
Depletion of CD4+ T cells in vivo
Ascites fluid (2.5-fold diluted with PBS) containing anti-L3T4 mAb derived from rat GK1.5 B cell hybridoma (a gift from Dr. E. Nakayama, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, Japan) 22 was injected in 200 µl vol into the retro-orbital sinuses of DBA/2 mice, as previously described. Six days following the mAb treatment, spleen cells were used for primary MLC. Depletion of CD4+ T cells (<0.5%) in the spleens was verified by flow cytometry before each experiment.
Mixed lymphocyte cultures
Stimulator cells were prepared by incubating the cells with 50
µg/ml of mitomycin C (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 30 min at 37°C. The
cells were then washed three times with medium. Responder cells (5
x 106/well) were cultured with mitomycin C-treated
stimulator cells (5 x 106/well) in flat-bottom
24-well plates in a total volume of 2 ml at 37°C in a 5%
CO2 humidified atomosphere. Cytokines including IL-18 and
IL-12, Abs, or culture supernatants previously collected from other
conditioned MLCs were added at the initiation of primary MLC. In this
study, 540 pM of either IL-18 or IL-12 was added to the culture. At
this concentration, IL-18 exhibited maximum IFN-
production in
primary MLC (data not shown). After 5 days, supernatants were collected
and frozen at -20°C for subsequent IFN-
and IL-10 assays, and
culture cells were harvested and washed. In experiments in which
purified CD8+ T cells were used as responder populations,
primary MLCs were performed for 6 days. Mitomycin C-treated
BDF1 spleen cells produced low levels of IFN-
in
response to IL-18 during 5 days of primary MLC (medium alone, <0.6
IU/ml; IL-18 treatment, <6.3 IU/ml; IL-12 treatment, <0.8 IU/ml). To
determine the function of CD8+ T cells and CD4+
T cells, each cell population was purified by positive selection
through panning. First, the cells were suspended in culture medium
containing 0.05% sodium azide, incubated either with rat anti-CD8
mAb or anti-L3T4 mAb for 30 min on ice, and washed twice with
medium containing sodium azide. Then the cells were seeded on a goat
anti-rat IgG-coated plate for 1 h at 4°C. Nonadherent cells
were removed by gentle washing, and the remaining adherent cells were
incubated in culture medium at 37°C overnight to allow detachment
from the plate. The resulting purified CD8+ and
CD4+ T cells were washed, counted for viable cells, and
used for secondary stimulation and cytotoxicity assays. Flow cytometry
revealed that all T cell populations used for the secondary stimulation
consisted of >98% CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T
cells. To determine their cytokine production profile, the purified
CD8+ or CD4+ T cells (3 x
104/well) were restimulated with mitomycin C-treated
stimulator spleen cells (1 x 106/well) in the
presence or absence of IL-2 (10 U/ml), or with immobilized anti-CD3
mAb in 96-well plates. After 2 days (for CD8+ T cells) or 3
days (for CD4+ T cells) of incubation, the cell-free
supernatants were collected and frozen at -20°C until assayed.
IFN-
production by CD8+ T cells and
CD4+ T cells during the secondary stimulation reached a
plateau level on days 2 and 3, respectively.
Cytotoxicity assays
Cytotoxicity was examined in standard 51Cr release assays. Briefly, the target cells EL-4 (H-2b) or P815 (H-2d) were labeled with 51Cr for 1 h at 37°C. Viable effector CD8+ T cells were isolated from responder cells by centrifugation over Ficoll-Hypaque (Sigma). Target cells were then incubated with various numbers of effector cells for 4 h. Supernatants were collected, radioactivity was counted by gamma counter, and specific lysis was calculated according to the following formula: percent specific lysis = [(cpm experimental - cpm spontaneous)/(cpm maximum - cpm spontaneous)] x 100.
Flow-cytometric analysis
The cells (
105 cells/tube) were washed three
times in PBS containing 1% FCS and 0.05% sodium azide, and then
stained first with primary mAbs followed by FITC-conjugated
F(ab')2 fragments of goat anti-rat IgG (PharMingen) or
FITC streptavidin (Genzyme) for 30 min each on ice. Isotype-matched
control Abs were used for background staining. The cells were washed
and resuspended in 500 µl of 1% FCS-PBS before analysis. Stained
cells were analyzed on an EPICS Profile II flow cytometer (Coulter
Electronics, Hialeah, FL) after gating on viable cells.
Cytokine assays
The concentrations of cytokines (IFN-
and IL-10) in
the culture supernatants were determined by two-site sandwich ELISA
using the Abs described above. Standard curves were generated using
recombinant cytokines. The lower limit of detection was 0.6 IU/ml (1
IU = 7 ng) for IFN-
and 0.6 ng/ml for IL-10.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To investigate whether exogenous IL-18 affects the
activation of CD4+, CD8+, or both T cell
subsets, DBA/2 spleen cells were stimulated with mitomycin C-treated
BDF1 spleen cells (DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC) in
the presence or absence of IL-18, and the ratio of CD8+ to
CD4+ T cells was evaluated after MLC by flow cytometry
(Table I
). In addition, MLC supplemented
with IL-12, which is known to share several biological functions with
IL-18, was prepared. On day 5 after the start of MLC, there were no
significant differences in the CD8/CD4 ratios between all three MLCs
(Table I
). When cells recovered from MLC on day 5 were expanded in
fresh medium containing 10 U/ml of IL-2 and then further incubated for
48 h, IL-18 treatment resulted in a twofold increase in the
CD8/CD4 ratio compared with controls receiving medium only. The actual
number of CD8+ T cells stimulated with IL-18 increased up
to threefold after a 2-day expansion culture with IL-2, although
IL-18-primed CD4+ T cells increased in number slightly. In
contrast, the addition of IL-12 resulted in a twofold lower ratio than
the controls. Furthermore, neither CD4+ nor
CD8+ T cells recovered from IL-12-supplemented culture
increased in number after culturing with IL-2. The mean fluorescence
intensity of CD markers of CD4 and CD8 T cell populations in the
presence of IL-18 or IL-12 was similar to that observed in control MLC
(data not shown). These results suggest that in the DBA/2
anti-BDF1 MLC, exogenous IL-18 affects the activation
of primarily CD8+ T cells rather than CD4+ T
cells, whereas IL-12 affects the activation of CD4+ T cells
rather than CD8+ T cells.
|
To assess the effect of IL-18 on the development of
CD8+ effector T cells, the cells were recovered from the
primary MLC of DBA/2 anti-BDF1 system on day 5.
CD8+ T cells were then purified by panning and were
restimulated with mitomycin C-treated C57BL/6 spleen cells or with
immobilized anti-CD3 mAb in the presence or absence of IL-2 to
determine their cytokine profile. In addition, the results obtained
with IL-18 were compared with those of MLC stimulated with IL-12. The
levels of IFN-
in primary MLC stimulated with either IL-18 or IL-12
were, respectively, about 10 times or 5 times higher than those in the
control MLC (Fig. 1
A). When
CD8+ T cells primed with IL-18 were stimulated with
mitomycin C-treated C57BL/6 spleen cells in the secondary MLC, IFN-
production markedly increased compared with that produced by
CD8+ T cells cultured in medium alone regardless of the
presence or absence of IL-2 (Fig. 1
B). Surprisingly,
however, IL-12 treatment led rather to a reduction in secondary IFN-
production by CD8+ T cells, as compared with that produced
by CD8+ T cells cultured in medium alone. Similar findings
were observed when CD8+ T cells recovered from primary MLC
were restimulated with immobilized anti-CD3 mAb alone (Fig. 1
C). This result eliminates the possibility that increased
IFN-
production by CD8+ T cells primed with IL-18 might
be caused by APC-derived factors in the secondary MLC. Although the
secondary IFN-
production shown in Fig. 1
, B and
C, was assessed 48 h after secondary stimulation, the
levels of IFN-
produced by CD8+ T cells primed with
IL-12 remained lower than those in control cultures even when IFN-
production was assessed on day 5 of the secondary stimulation (data not
shown). Thus, it seems unlikely that IL-12-mediated suppression of the
secondary IFN-
production by CD8+ T cells is due to a
difference in the kinetics of IFN-
production. In addition,
CD8+ T cells primed with IL-18, IL-12, or medium alone did
not produce detectable levels of the type II cytokine IL-10, in the
secondary MLC (data not shown). These results suggest that type I
CD8+ T cells were generated during primary MLC supplemented
with IL-18.
|
-chain (CD25) on
CD8+ T cells recovered from primary MLC by flow cytometry.
As expected from the results in Fig. 1
-chain expression on CD8+ T cells, but in
CD8+ T cells primed with medium alone or IL-12, its
receptor expression was marginal (medium alone, 10%; IL-18 treatment,
21.6%; IL-12 treatment, 8.3%). These results further indicate that in
DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC, exogenous IL-18 strongly induced
the development of type I CD8+ effector T cells, but
conversely, IL-12 inhibited this development. IL-18 enhances generation of allospecific CD8+ CTL activity
CD8+ T cells are the classical mediators of cytotoxic
activity and, in general, develop into cytotoxic effectors upon
activation 23, 24 . Therefore, we decided to determine whether IL-18
can also develop the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells in
DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC. As shown in Fig. 2
, IL-18 strongly augmented allospecific
CD8+ CTL activity against EL-4 (H-2b). In
contrast, IL-12 significantly down-regulated this activity. This
cytolytic function of CD8+ T cells was allospecific, since
these cells exhibited no lysis against the syngeneic tumor target, P815
(H-2d) (<5% specific lysis). Taken together, these data
indicate that IL-18 induced the development of naive CD8+ T
cells into an allospecific CTL population. In marked contrast and
unexpectedly, IL-12 inhibited CTL development in DBA/2
anti-BDF1 MLC.
|
production is not required for IL-18 to induce
type I CD8+ effector T cell development
IFN-
has been reported to play an important role in CTL
generation 25, 26, 27 . In our experiments, IL-18 strongly induced IFN-
production in primary MLC (Fig. 1
A). To determine whether
increased IFN-
was required for the IL-18-mediated generation of
type I CD8+ effector T cells, neutralizing rabbit
anti-IFN-
pAbs were added to the primary MLC supplemented with
IL-18. Rabbit anti-Cryj II pAbs were used as the control Ab. The
addition of 25 µg/ml of anti-IFN-
pAb, which can neutralize
3000 IU/ml of IFN-
, did not reduce secondary IFN-
production by
CD8+ T cells primed with IL-18, but rather increased the
IFN-
production (Fig. 3
). These
results suggest that the effect of IL-18 on the generation of type I
CD8+ effector T cells does not depend on increased IFN-
production in primary MLC.
|
In our experiments, it remained to be resolved whether IL-18 acts
directly on CD8+ T cells to induce type I effector T cell
development. To address this question, naive CD8+ T cells
purified from DBA/2 mouse spleen cells by positive selection method
using anti-CD8 mAb were used as responder populations in the
primary MLC with BDF1 spleen cells in the presence of
IL-18. The levels of IFN-
produced by CD8+ T cells in
the primary MLC supplemented with IL-18 were higher than those produced
by CD8+ T cells in control MLC (medium alone, <0.6 IU/ml;
IL-18 priming, 16.7 ± 1.1 IU/ml). This indicates that IL-18 can
act on CD8+ T cells to induce IFN-
production. However,
the CD8+ T cells recovered from this MLC secreted much
lower levels of IFN-
after secondary stimulation than
CD8+ T cells purified after primary IL-18-stimulated MLC
using whole spleen cells as responders (referred to as whole spleen
cell MLC) (Fig. 4
; 2.6 IU/ml versus 61.4
IU/ml), suggesting that IL-18 by itself cannot directly induce type I
effector T cell development of naive CD8+ T cells purified
before primary MLC. Experiments with naive CD8+ T cells
purified by negative selection method gave similar results with those
of naive CD8+ T cells purified by positive selection method
with anti-CD8 mAb (data not shown). This excludes the possibility
that the response of CD8+ T cells purified by positive
panning may have been modified by residual anti-CD8 mAb. These
results further suggest that the effects of IL-18 on the generation of
type I effector CD8+ T cells may be mediated by other
soluble factors or by cell to cell contact. But in contrast to the
whole spleen cell MLC as shown in Fig. 4
, purified naive
CD8+ T cells primed with IL-12 produced substantial levels
of IFN-
after secondary stimulation, although the levels of IFN-
produced were lower than those produced by CD8+ T cells
derived from IL-18-stimulated whole spleen cell MLC. This shows that
IL-12 can, to some extent, directly stimulate the generation of type I
CD8+ effector T cells.
|
Depletion of CD4+ T cells abrogates IL-18-induced type I CD8+ effector T cell development, but maintains IL-12-induced suppression of CD8+ T cell function
The results presented in the preceding sections demonstrated that IL-18 alone was unable to induce the development of purified naive CD8+ T cells into effector cells. Since it has been shown that CD4+ T cell helper function is necessary for the expansion and development of CD8+ effector T cells 28, 29, 30, 31 , we noted a possible requirement for CD4+ T cells in IL-18-induced type I CD8+ effector T cell development and in IL-12-induced suppression of CD8+ T cell function in DBA/2 anti-BDF1 whole spleen cell MLC.
To examine this possibility, CD4+ T cells among the
responder spleen cells were depleted by injecting anti-L3T4 mAb
into DBA/2 mice 6 days before primary MLC. FACS analysis showed that
CD4+ cell contamination in the spleen cells was <0.5%.
Depletion of CD4+ T cells substantially reduced secondary
IFN-
production by CD8+ T cells, especially those primed
with IL-18 (Fig. 5
). This is consistent
with previous finding that CD4+ T cell help is required for
the generation of CD8+ effector T cells 28, 29, 30, 31 . On the
other hand, even when CD4+ T cells were depleted, IL-12
could still suppress secondary IFN-
production, suggesting that the
IL-12-mediated suppression of CD8+ effector T cell
development does not depend on the presence of CD4+ T
cells.
|
The results presented in the preceding sections revealed that
exogenous IL-12 suppressed the development of CD8+ effector
T cells in DBA/2 anti-BDF1 whole spleen cell MLC (Figs. 1
and 2
). Recent reports showed that high dose IL-12 induces
immunosuppression by an unknown mechanism 32, 33, 34, 35 . We therefore
investigated the dose response after priming with IL-12 on IFN-
production by CD8+ T cells in the secondary MLC. As shown
in Fig. 6
, IL-12, even at very low
concentrations (11 and 1.1 pM), did not increase the IFN-
production
above the levels observed with medium alone. Thus, an inhibitory effect
of IL-12 priming was observed on IFN-
production by CD8+
T cells in the secondary MLC regardless of the concentration of IL-12.
|
Injection of C57BL/6 spleen cells into BDF1 mice
results in acute GVHD, as characterized by the induction of
anti-host (BDF1) CTL, IFN-
production, and
immunodeficiency 18, 19 . To investigate whether the inhibitory effect
of IL-12 on the development of CD8+ effector T cells is
limited to DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC, we performed C57BL/6
anti-BDF1 MLC in the presence of IL-18 or IL-12, and
compared the results with those of DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC.
The ratio of CD8+ to CD4+ T cells was evaluated
after a 5-day MLC followed by a 2-day culture with 10 U/ml of IL-2. As
shown in Table II
, the CD8/CD4 ratios in
all three MLC systems were higher than those observed in the DBA/2
anti-BDF1 MLC (Table I
). In marked contrast to the
IL-12-stimulated DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC, the percentage of
CD8+ T cells was higher than that of CD4+ T
cells in the IL-12-stimulated C57BL/6 anti-BDF1 MLC.
IFN-
and IL-10 production in the primary MLC are shown in Table III
. In contrast with the results from
DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC, IL-12-induced IFN-
production
was much higher than that induced by IL-18 in the C57BL/6
anti-BDF1 MLC. Furthermore, IL-12 induced comparable
levels of IL-10 production in both MLC systems, whereas IL-18 did not
induce detectable levels of IL-10 production in either system.
CD8+ T cells recovered and purified after primary MLC were
restimulated with mitomycin C-treated DBA/2 spleen cells in the
presence or absence of IL-2, and then examined for secondary IFN-
production. As expected from the characteristics of mice with acute
GVHD that is induced by injection of C57BL/6 spleen cells into
BDF1 mice, CD8+ T cells primed with medium
alone produced substantial levels of IFN-
after secondary
stimulation, which were comparable with those produced by
CD8+ T cells recovered from DBA/2 anti-BDF1
MLC supplemented with IL-18 (Fig. 7
). In
marked contrast to the inhibitory effect of IL-12 priming in DBA/2
anti-BDF1 MLC, both IL-18 and IL-12 induced higher
levels of secondary IFN-
production than those observed with medium
alone (Fig. 7
B). Furthermore, CD8+ T cells
primed with IL-18, IL-12, or medium alone did not produce detectable
amounts of IL-10 after secondary stimulation (data not shown). Thus,
IL-12 efficiently supported the development of type I CD8+
effector T cells in C57BL/6 anti-BDF1 MLC, suggesting
that the difference in the IL-12-mediated development of
CD8+ effector T cells between the two MLC systems, DBA/2
anti-BDF1 and C57BL/6 anti-BDF1, may be
due to the reactivity of the responder cells to IL-12.
|
|
|
production compared with
cultures primed with IL-12 alone (Fig. 8
|
To examine whether CD4+ T cells primed with IL-18 or
IL-12 differentiated into Th1 cells, CD4+ T cells recovered
after DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC were restimulated with
mitomycin C-treated C57BL/6 spleen cells for 3 days to determine their
IFN-
production. As shown in Fig. 9
,
CD4+ T cells primed with IL-18 or IL-12 produced
substantial amounts of IFN-
. Interestingly, IFN-
production by
CD4+ T cells primed with IL-12 was rather higher than in
cultures primed with IL-18. Moreover, IL-10 production was not observed
after secondary stimulation in any system (data not shown). These
results indicate that the addition of either IL-18 or IL-12 efficiently
induced Th1 development of naive CD4+ T cells in DBA/2
anti-BDF1 MLC. These results further suggest that IL-12
has a differential effect on the development of CD4+ Th1
and type I CD8+ effector T cells in immune responses under
certain conditions.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production upon restimulation
with allogeneic cells or with immobilized anti-CD3 mAb, and as
defined by allogeneic target cell lysis. These increased levels of
secondary IFN-
production by CD8+ T cells correlated
well with the augmentation of allospecific CTL activity. It seems
unlikely that the IL-18-induced augmentation of secondary IFN-
production (20- to 30-fold of control levels) by CD8+ T
cells is due to an increase in the proliferation of CD8+ T
cells because the proliferative response of CD8+ T cells
derived from the IL-18-stimulated MLC after secondary stimulation with
alloantigen was at most two- to fivefold higher than that of the
control MLC cells (data not shown). In marked contrast, IL-12
suppressed the induction of CTL activity and the secondary IFN-
production of CD8+ T cells when whole spleen cells were
used as responder cells in DBA/2 anti-BDF1 primary MLC.
The IL-18-induced development of CD8+ effector T cells and
the increase in CD8/CD4 ratios may be accounted for by the suppression
of CD4+ T cell proliferation by CD8+ T cells
activated with IL-18. Recently, Noble et al. reported that
activated CD8+ T cells suppress the proliferation of
CD4+ T cells and induce CD4+ T cell apoptosis
through a Fas-dependent mechanism 36 . In fact, in our experimental
system, the CD8/CD4 ratios in the responder cells of C57BL/6
anti-BDF1 primary MLC were higher than those in DBA/2
anti-BDF1 primary MLC, regardless of the addition of
IL-18 or IL-12. These findings correlated well with the levels of
IFN-
produced by CD8+ T cells during secondary culture.
IL-18 alone could not support the optimal development of purified naive
CD8+ T cells, although it did act on purified naive
CD8+ T cells to produce low but detectable levels of
IFN-
during primary MLC. The inability of IL-18 to induce the
development of purified naive CD8+ T cells into type I
effector cells may be due to the reduction in endogenous IFN-
in
primary MLC compared with that produced in whole spleen cell MLC. In
fact, several groups have reported that IFN-
stimulates
CD8+ CTL generation 25, 26, 27 . However, as we have shown in
this study, increased IFN-
was not responsible for the IL-18-induced
generation of effector CD8+ T cells, but rather inhibited
it. Furthermore, in the case of IL-12, increased IFN-
may not be
required for allospecific CTL generation, based on a recent report
showing that the anti-IFN-
Ab could not reduce the CTL activity
induced by IL-12, and that large amounts of exogenous IFN-
(1000
IU/ml) inhibited this activity 16 . Moreover, IFN-
knockout mice
could still mount CTL activity against allogeneic target cells 37 ,
suggesting that IFN-
is not essential to induce CTL activity.
CD4+ T cells have been reported to play an important role
in CD8+ CTL induction 28, 29, 30, 31 . In the present study, we
demonstrated that IL-18-induced type I CD8+ effector T cell
development also required CD4+ T cell help. This
CD4+ T cell-dependent mechanism for type I CD8+
effector T cell development was not accounted for by the possible
existence of soluble factors because the supernatants collected from
primary MLC supplemented with IL-18 did not induce CD8+ T
cell development. Since the depletion of CD4+ T cells
resulted in an almost complete abrogation of secondary IFN-
production by CD8+ T cells primed with IL-18, the
allospecific type I CD8+ effector T cell response induced
by IL-18 may be mediated mainly through the interactions between APCs
and CD4+ T cells. Recently, it has been reported that
CD4+ T cell help for CD8+ CTL generation
involves the activation of APCs following CD40-CD40 ligand interactions
between CD4+ T cells and APCs 38, 39, 40 . IL-18 may
facilitate the activation of APCs by up-regulating the expression of
CD40 or CD40 ligand.
Recently, it was shown that high doses of IL-12 inhibit CTL activity,
IFN-
production, and the proliferation of spleen cells in mice
vaccinated with the p53 peptide or syngeneic tumor, or they abrogate
the CTL response in mice infected with lymphocytic choriomeningitis
virus 32, 33, 34 . Moreover, spleen cells from IL-12-treated normal mice
show decreased CTL activity ex vivo 35 . However, the mechanisms
underlying the IL-12-induced suppression were not well defined in any
of these experiments. In these reports, the in vivo injection of IL-12
into experimental model mice resulted in immune suppression. On the
other hand, we have revealed for the first time by in vitro experiments
that IL-12 has an inhibitory effect on CD8+ T cell
function.
Several possibilities are considered for the IL-12-induced inhibition
of CD8+ T cell function in DBA/2 anti-BDF1
MLC. For example, IL-12 may indirectly influence CD8+ T
cells with negative regulatory signals by way of soluble factors or
cell to cell contact with other spleen cell populations, including
CD4+ T cells and macrophages. However, for the two reasons
described below, it seems unlikely that soluble inhibitory factors were
endogenously induced by exogenous IL-12 to then inhibit
CD8+ T cell function. First, the levels of IL-10, which
inhibits IFN-
production, were comparable between the two primary
MLCs, DBA/2 anti-BDF1 and C57BL/6
anti-BDF1. Second, the culture supernatant from DBA/2
anti-BDF1 primary MLC did not inhibit the IL-12-induced
development of type I CD8+ effector T cells in C57BL/6
anti-BDF1 MLC.
It has been reported that CD4+ T cells inhibit
CD8+ T cell expansion and tumor infiltration in the
presence of IL-12, although CD4+ T cells do not influence
the CTL activity of CD8+ T cells 41 . In our in vitro MLC
system, however, CD4 cell depletion did not restore the IL-12-mediated
suppression of CD8+ T cell function. Thus, in the case of
IL-12-driven CD8+ T cell development, CD4+ T
cells may not inhibit or be essential for the generation of type I
CD8+ effector T cells. We also examined whether macrophages
were required for the IL-12-mediated suppression of CD8+ T
cell function. When the DBA/2 spleen cells that had been passed through
a Sephadex G-10 column were used as responder cells in MLC with
BDF1 spleen cells in the presence of IL-12,
CD8+ T cell function could not be restored (data not
shown). It has been reported that NK cells also suppress the generation
of CD8+ T cell cytotoxic activity 42 . Therefore, NK cells
may play some role in the IL-12-induced suppressive effect on
CD8+ T cell function. An alternative explanation for
IL-12-induced suppression is that CD8+ T cells primed with
exogenous IL-12 may express killer cell inhibitory receptors, a new
family of MHC class I-specific receptors 43, 44, 45, 46 , and inhibit their
own function, including the induction of IFN-
production and CTL
activity, as a consequence of MHC class I/killer cell inhibitory
receptor interaction. Further studies are needed to clarify these
possibilities.
Our results, together with findings published elsewhere regarding
IL-12-induced suppression 32, 33, 34, 35 , raise the possibility that IL-12
treatment may cause unpredictable consequences in vivo. Therefore, we
investigated in a DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC system whether
exogenous IL-18 or IL-2 can restore CD8+ T cell function
suppressed by IL-12. In a preliminary experiment, the addition of IL-18
together with 540 pM of IL-12 to DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC
resulted in the restoration of IL-12-mediated immunosuppression and in
a substantial augmentation of secondary IFN-
production by
CD8+ T cells in an IL-18 dose-dependent manner (540 pM
IL-12, 0.8 IU/ml; 54 pM IL-18 + 540 pM IL-12, 20.8 IU/ml; 540 pM
IL-18 + 540 pM IL-12, 49.1 IU/ml). In contrast, IL-2 (10 U/ml) had
little effect on the restoration of IL-12-mediated suppression (data
not shown). These results suggest that administration of IL-18 can
restore the immunosuppression exerted by IL-12 in vivo.
In summary, we demonstrated for the first time that exogenous IL-18 induced the development of naive CD8+ T cells into type I effector cells in a CD4+ T cell-dependent manner. On the contrary, under certain conditions, the addition of IL-12 inhibited type I CD8+ effector T cell development, although IL-12 induced Th1 development. Injection of DBA/2 spleen cells into BDF1 mice induces a chronic GVHD in which the anti-host (BDF1) CTL response is defective 19, 20 . Furthermore, Via et al. proposed that anti-host CTL may play an important role in eliminating autoreactive host B cells 20 . The finding that IL-18 augments allospecific CD8+ CTL activity in DBA/2 anti-BDF1 MLC provides a possibility that IL-18 may be useful for the immunotherapy of systemic autoimmune diseases such as chronic GVHD and systemic lupus erythematosus by inducing CD8+ CTL. Further in vivo studies are now in progress to confirm this possibility.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: GVHD, graft-vs-host disease; pAb, polyclonal Ab. ![]()
Received for publication August 11, 1998. Accepted for publication December 11, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production by T cells. Nature 378:88.[Medline]
inducing factor, expression in Escherichia coli, and studies on the biological activities of the protein. J. Immunol. 156:4274.[Abstract]
-inducing factor (IGIF) is a costimulatory factor on the activation of Th1 but not Th2 cells and exerts its effect independently of IL-12. J. Immunol. 158:1541.[Abstract]
production and activates IRAK and NF
B. Immunity 7:571.[Medline]
-inducing factor enhances T helper 1 cytokine production by stimulated human T cells: synergism with interleukin-12 for IFN-
production. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1647.[Medline]
-inducing factor in enhanced production of IFN-
. J. Immunol. 159:2125.
-inducing factor) mRNA and functional protein by murine keratinocytes. J. Immunol. 159:298.[Abstract]
in response to IL-18. J. Immunol. 160:3759.
inhibits Moloney murine sarcoma virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte differentiation. J. Immunol. 140:1341.[Abstract]
are two necessary lymphokines in the development of cytolytic T cells. J. Immunol. 143:1210.[Abstract]
. Int. Immunol. 8:661.
genes. Science 259:1739.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Nandakumar, S. N. Woolard, D. Yuan, B. T. Rouse, and U. Kumaraguru Natural Killer Cells as Novel Helpers in Anti-Herpes Simplex Virus Immune Response J. Virol., November 1, 2008; 82(21): 10820 - 10831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Li, S.-i. Kashiwamura, H. Ueda, A. Sekiyama, and H. Okamura Protection of CD8+ T cells from activation-induced cell death by IL-18 J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2007; 82(1): 142 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-i. Yamanaka, R. Clark, R. Dowgiert, D. Hurwitz, M. Shibata, B. E. Rich, K. Hirahara, D. A. Jones, S. Eapen, H. Mizutani, et al. Expression of Interleukin-18 and Caspase-1 in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 12(2): 376 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-K. Min, Y. Maeda, K. Lowler, C. Liu, S. Clouthier, D. Lofthus, E. Weisiger, J. L. M. Ferrara, and P. Reddy Paradoxical effects of interleukin-18 on the severity of acute graft-versus-host disease mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets after experimental allogeneic bone marrow transplantation Blood, November 15, 2004; 104(10): 3393 - 3399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vankayalapati, P. Klucar, B. Wizel, S. E. Weis, B. Samten, H. Safi, H. Shams, and P. F. Barnes NK Cells Regulate CD8+ T Cell Effector Function in Response to an Intracellular Pathogen J. Immunol., January 1, 2004; 172(1): 130 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Baxevanis, A. D. Gritzapis, and M. Papamichail In Vivo Antitumor Activity of NKT Cells Activated by the Combination of IL-12 and IL-18 J. Immunol., September 15, 2003; 171(6): 2953 - 2959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Gherardi, J. C. Ramirez, and M. Esteban IL-12 and IL-18 act in synergy to clear vaccinia virus infection: involvement of innate and adaptive components of the immune system J. Gen. Virol., August 1, 2003; 84(8): 1961 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Wang, C. Feliciani, B. G. Howell, I. Freed, Q. Cai, H. Watanabe, and D. N. Sauder Contribution of Langerhans Cell-Derived IL-18 to Contact Hypersensitivity J. Immunol., April 1, 2002; 168(7): 3303 - 3308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Reddy, T. Teshima, M. Kukuruga, R. Ordemann, C. Liu, K. Lowler, and J. L.M. Ferrara Interleukin-18 Regulates Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease by Enhancing Fas-mediated Donor T Cell Apoptosis J. Exp. Med., November 12, 2001; 194(10): 1433 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Neighbors, X. Xu, F. J. Barrat, S. R. Ruuls, T. Churakova, R. Debets, J. F. Bazan, R. A. Kastelein, J. S. Abrams, and A. O'Garra A Critical Role for Interleukin 18 in Primary and Memory Effector Responses to Listeria monocytogenes That Extends Beyond Its Effects on Interferon {gamma} Production J. Exp. Med., August 6, 2001; 194(3): 343 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Itoi, Y. Fujimori, H. Tsutsui, K. Matsui, S. Futatsugi, H. Okamura, H. Hara, T. Hada, E. Kakishita, and K. Nakanishi Fas ligand-induced caspase-1-dependent accumulation of interleukin-18 in mice with acute graft-versus-host disease Blood, July 1, 2001; 98(1): 235 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vankayalapati, B. Wizel, D. L. Lakey, Y. Zhang, K. A. Coffee, D. E. Griffith, and P. F. Barnes T Cells Enhance Production of IL-18 by Monocytes in Response to an Intracellular Pathogen J. Immunol., June 1, 2001; 166(11): 6749 - 6753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Horwood, J. Elliott, T. J. Martin, and M. T. Gillespie IL-12 Alone and in Synergy with IL-18 Inhibits Osteoclast Formation In Vitro J. Immunol., April 15, 2001; 166(8): 4915 - 4921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Dittmer, K. E. Peterson, R. Messer, I. M. Stromnes, B. Race, and K. J. Hasenkrug Role of Interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-12, and Gamma Interferon in Primary and Vaccine-Primed Immune Responses to Friend Retrovirus Infection J. Virol., January 15, 2001; 75(2): 654 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. T. Maecker, G. Hansen, D. M. Walter, R. H. DeKruyff, S. Levy, and D. T. Umetsu Vaccination with Allergen-IL-18 Fusion DNA Protects Against, and Reverses Established, Airway Hyperreactivity in a Murine Asthma Model J. Immunol., January 15, 2001; 166(2): 959 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Tanaka, W. Hashimoto, H. Okamura, P. D. Robbins, M. T. Lotze, and H. Tahara Rapid Generation of Potent and Tumor-specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes by Interleukin 18 Using Dendritic Cells and Natural Killer Cells Cancer Res., September 1, 2000; 60(17): 4838 - 4844. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Brossart, A. Zobywalski, F. Grünebach, L. Behnke, G. Stuhler, V. L. Reichardt, L. Kanz, and W. Brugger Tumor Necrosis Factor {{alpha}} and CD40 Ligand Antagonize the Inhibitory Effects of Interleukin 10 on T-Cell Stimulatory Capacity of Dendritic Cells Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 60(16): 4485 - 4492. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. Okamoto, K. Kohno, T. Tanimoto, K. Iwaki, T. Ishihara, S. Akamatsu, H. Ikegami, and M. Kurimoto IL-18 Prevents the Development of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Mice J. Immunol., June 1, 2000; 164(11): 6067 - 6074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Campbell, S. L. Kunkel, R. M. Strieter, and N. W. Lukacs Differential Roles of IL-18 in Allergic Airway Disease: Induction of Eotaxin by Resident Cell Populations Exacerbates Eosinophil Accumulation J. Immunol., January 15, 2000; 164(2): 1096 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Hansen, V. P. Yeung, G. Berry, D. T. Umetsu, and R. H. DeKruyff Vaccination with Heat-Killed Listeria as Adjuvant Reverses Established Allergen-Induced Airway Hyperreactivity and Inflammation: Role of CD8+ T Cells and IL-18 J. Immunol., January 1, 2000; 164(1): 223 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Schober, C. T. Kuo, K. S. Schluns, L. Lefrancois, J. M. Leiden, and S. C. Jameson Expression of the Transcription Factor Lung Kruppel-Like Factor Is Regulated by Cytokines and Correlates with Survival of Memory T Cells In Vitro and In Vivo J. Immunol., October 1, 1999; 163(7): 3662 - 3667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |