|
|
||||||||




,§
Departments of
*
Internal Medicine,
Surgery,
Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, and
§
Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Graduate School of Public Health, and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15261
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, during priming with Nef-expressing DC, enhanced the
Nef-specific CTL responses generated using either Ag-loading approach.
These results suggest that this in vitro vaccine model may be useful in
identifying immunogenic epitopes as vaccine targets and in evaluating
the effects of cytokines and other adjuvants on Ag-specific T cell
induction. Successful approaches may provide information important to
the development of prophylactic HIV vaccines and are envisioned to be
readily translated into clinical DC-based therapeutic vaccines for
HIV-1. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The incorporation of cytokines into vaccines as a means of enhancing or altering the resulting immune response represents an area of intense research interest. Ahlers et al. 5 evaluated murine immune responses generated against synthetic HIV peptide vaccines containing recombinant cytokines as adjuvant. The addition of granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF)3 to the cutaneous vaccine microenvironment led to an overall enhancement of both cellular and humoral responses to the vaccine construct, whereas GM-CSF and IL-12 synergized to enhance CTL induction. A number of other studies have demonstrated that copriming with IL-12 enhances the induction of HIV Ag-specific cell-mediated immunity 6, 7, 8 . Kim et al. reported a bias toward Th1-type immune responses to HIV Ags in a murine model following coinoculation of plasmids containing IL-12 and HIV DNA constructs 7 . These murine studies hold promise for HIV vaccine development, but the impact of adjuvant cytokines on the type and specificity of vaccine-induced T cell responses to HIV Ags in humans remains poorly defined.
Dendritic cells (DC) are the most potent APCs capable of priming MHC
class I- and II-restricted, Ag-specific T cell responses in vivo and in
vitro 9 . Their superior immunostimulatory capacity is felt to be due
in part to the high level expression of MHC and costimulatory
molecules, such as CD40, CD80, and CD86, as well as to their ability to
produce Th1-biasing cytokines, such as IL-12 10, 11, 12 and IFN-
13, 14, 15 . The capacity of DC to prime T cell responses to Ag and their
presence in multiple organs and in the skin suggests a central role for
DC in mediating immune responses to HIV vaccines. The mechanisms by
which DC process and present both extracellular and intracellular HIV-1
Ags are likely to impact the type of T cell responses generated using a
particular vaccine format.
We previously reported that DC genetically engineered to express tumor
Ags could prime tumor-specific CTL in vitro and that the induction of
tumor-specific CTL was enhanced when DC were engineered to coexpress
Th1-biasing cytokines 16 . In the present study, we extend these
observations by evaluating immunodominance of epitopes recognized by
cytotoxic T cells induced by DC engineered to express an HIV Ag or
loaded with exogenous HIV protein. Furthermore, we have attempted to
establish the mechanisms by which Th1-biasing cytokines enhance
HIV-specific T cell induction using either Ag loading approach. This in
vitro human vaccination model for HIV-1 utilizes DC cultured from
HIV-1-seronegative donors to stimulate primary Ag-specific autologous T
cell responses in vitro. HIV-1 Nef was investigated as a model
immunogen because of its proven immunogenicity during natural HIV
infection 17, 18, 19, 20 and its relatively conserved amino acid sequence
among variant HIV strains 21 . Primary, MHC class I-restricted CTL
responses were generated by DC exposed to recombinant HIV-1 Nef
protein, as well as Ag expressed in the DC as a result of bioballistic
nef gene transfer. T cells stimulated in this fashion were
tested for recognition of defined MHC class I-restricted Nef epitope
peptides, and a correlation was made between T cell recognition of
epitope peptides and the ability of the defined epitope peptides to
bind to the restricting HLA molecule. Finally, we evaluated the impact
of the cytokines IL-12 and IFN-
, added or expressed during T cell
priming, on the strength, breadth, and specificity of the resulting
immune response.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PBMC were isolated from heparinized peripheral blood obtained by venipuncture from normal donors using density centrifugation. After four or five washes with HBSS (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), 107 cells/ml serum-free AIM-V medium (Life Technologies) were plated in flasks and incubated for 11.5 h at 37°C. Nonadherent cells were removed with gentle washes, and plastic-adherent cells were cultured for 510 days in AIM-V medium supplemented with 1000 U/ml rIL-4 and rGM-CSF. Following this culture period, nonadherent cells (DC) were harvested and further purified as necessary by discontinuous density centrifugation on a layer of Nycoprep 1.064 (Nycomed, Oslo, Sweden):LSM (Organon-Teknika, Durham, NC), 9:1, 1000 x g for 10 min. Cells generated in this fashion were determined to be >90% DC based on morphology and the expression of a CD3/CD14/CD16/CD20-negative, MHC class II+, CD40+, CD80+, CD86+ phenotype assessed by direct immunofluorescence assays monitored by flow cytometry. Day 7 yields were approximately 515% of starting normal donor PBMC numbers.
Plasmid DNA
The plasmid pCMV-A-hIFN
2b was constructed by ligating a
NotI-EcoRI fragment containing the hIFN
2b cDNA
(kindly provided by Dr. Paul Zavodny, Schering-Plough Research
Institute, Kenilworth, NJ) into CMV-A. pCMV-A-hIL-12 (p40-IRES-p35) was
constructed by ligating a BamHI fragment containing the IRES
sequence from EMCV followed by the human p35 cDNA 22 into pCMV-A-p40
(kindly provided by Dr. Will Swain, Auragen/Geniva, Madison,
WI). The plasmid pCI-Nef was constructed by subcloning the ORF of
HIV1-Nef (LAI strain) into the expression plasmid pCI (Promega,
Middleton, WI). Using PCR techniques, a
SalI-NotI-fragment was generated from a proviral
construct containing HIV-Nef (kindly provided by S.-Y. Kim, Seoul,
Korea) and ligated into pCI. The insert was sequenced in both
directions to exclude mutations introduced by PCR. Plasmids were grown
in Escherichia coli strain DH5
and purified using Qiagen
Endofree Plasmid Maxi Kits (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA).
Particle-mediated gene transfer to DC
Plasmid DNA was precipitated onto 2.6-µm gold particles at a density of 2 µg of DNA per mg of particles. Briefly, gold particles and DNA were resuspended in 100 µl of 0.05 M spermidine (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO), and DNA was precipitated by the addition of 100 µl of 1 M CaCl2. Particles were washed in dry ethanol to remove H2O, resuspended in dry ethanol containing 0.075 mg/ml PVP (Sigma), and coated onto the inner surface of Tefzel tubing using a tube loader. The tubing was cut into 0.5-inch segments, resulting in the delivery of 0.5 mg of gold coated with 1 µg of plasmid DNA per transfection with the Accell helium pulse gun. Gold particles, tubing, tube loader, and the Accell helium pulse gun were kindly provided by Auragen/Geniva. DC were transfected in suspension in six-well plates. DC were harvested and pelleted by centrifugation, and 2 x 106 cells were resuspended in 20 µl of fresh medium and spread evenly in the center of each well. Cells were bombarded at a pressure of 300 psi of helium, and fresh culture medium was added immediately.
Induction of primary T cell responses
For protein pulsing experiments, day 510 DC were pulsed
overnight with recombinant HIV-1 Nef (LAI strain) (AGMED, Bedford,
MA) at a concentration of 20 µg/ml, washed, irradiated with
3000 rad, and cocultured with autologous nonadherent PBMC at a ratio of
1 DC:2050 PBMC in AIM-V medium supplemented with 5% human AB serum.
In some experiments, recombinant cytokine hIL-12 (final concentration,
500 pg/ml) or hIFN
-2b (final concentration, 100 U/ml)
(Schering-Plough) was added to the DC-PBMC coculture on day 1 of
induction. Proliferating responder T cells were restimulated weekly
with irradiated, autologous DC pulsed with 5 µg/ml Nef overnight and
grown in AIM-V 5% human AB serum with 10 U/ml rIL-2. For gene delivery
experiments, DC cultured for 510 days were irradiated with 3000 rad
and transfected with the pCI-Nef plasmid by particle-mediated transfer
as described above. For coexpression of cytokines, DC were transfected
first with pCI-Nef, then in a subsequent "shot" with pCMV-A-hIFNa2b
or pCMV-A-hIL-12 plasmids, and cocultured with autologous responder
cells as described above. Responder T cells were restimulated weekly
with autologous DC transfected with pCI-Nef only. At the end of each
restimulation period (710 days), T cells were tested for Nef-specific
proliferation and lytic activity.
Cytotoxicity assays
Autologous B-lymphoblastoid cell line (B-LCL) or MHC class I-matched allogeneic B-LCL were incubated with 1020 µg/ml of Nef peptide and 100200 µCi of 51Cr in a total volume of 200 µl for 12 h at 37°C before use as targets. Targets were washed and added to plates at 5 x 103 cells/well in 100 µl. Responder T cells were plated at varying (2 or 3) E:T ratios in triplicate and assayed for cytotoxicity in a standard chromium release assay. The percentage of specific 51Cr release was calculated as 100 x (experimental release - spontaneous release)/(maximum release - spontaneous release). Lytic activity was expressed as the percentage specific lysis, or percentage lysis of HIV Ag-expressing targets minus percentage lysis of non-HIV Ag-expressing targets.
Peptides
Peptides spanning the entire Nef protein (LAI strain of HIV-1) were kindly supplied by Dr. Bruce Walker (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) and consisted of sequential 20-amino acid (aa) peptides overlapping by 15 aa. P1P6 represent pools of these overlapping peptides, with 4 peptides per pool (except P6, which contains the terminal 3 peptides) with P1 containing the N-terminus and P6 containing the C-terminus of Nef. The minimal epitope peptides were synthesized at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Peptide Synthesis facility using standard F-moc chemistry and purified by reverse-phase HPLC, with purity exceeding 90% based on mass spectrometry for m.w. All minimal epitope peptides are based on the LAI strain amino acid sequence of HIV-1 Nef 21 .
HLA typing
HLA typing was performed by Dr. P. Morel (University of Pittsburgh) or Childrens Hospital HLA Laboratory (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center) using standard serotyping assays.
MHC class I peptide binding assay
Binding of peptides to HLA-A2 and HLA-B7 were assessed using a class I reconstitution assay, as previously described 23 . Briefly, the class I-reduced B cell line transfectant expressing HLA-A2.1 (C1R.A2) or HLA-B7 (C1R.B7) was treated with a citrate-phosphate solution (pH 3.3) to denature preexisting class I complexes, as determined by loss of binding to conformation-dependent mAb (W6/32). Acid-treated cells were incubated with varying concentrations of peptides overnight in the presence of ß2-microglobulin (Sigma, 5 µg/ml). Cells were washed, fixed, stained with FITC-conjugated W6/32 mAb or anti-A2 mAb (BB7.2), and evaluated by flow cytometric analysis.
Flow cytometry
For immunophenotyping, DC or T cell responders were washed in HBSS supplemented with 1% BSA and 0.1% NaN3 and incubated (30 min at 4°C) with one of the following mAb: phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-HLA-DR (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA), FITC-conjugated anti-CD80 (Ancell, Bayport, MN), FITC-conjugated anti-CD86 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), FITC-conjugated anti-CD40 (PharMingen), PE-conjugated anti-CD3 (Becton Dickinson), FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 (Becton Dickinson), PE-conjugated anti-CD8 (Becton Dickinson), FITC-conjugated anti-CD14 (Becton Dickinson), PE-conjugated anti-CD16 (Becton Dickinson), and FITC-conjugated anti-CD20 (Becton Dickinson). DC were also stained with corresponding isotype-matched control mAb (PharMingen). Surface expression was analyzed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and Lysis II software, with data being collected on 5000 to 10000 viable cells.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|

We have previously shown that DC engineered to express tumor Ags
in vitro are potent stimulators of MHC class I-restricted,
tumor-specific CTL 16 . In the present study, we sought to determine
whether DC engineered to express an HIV Ag could induce primary
HIV-specific T cell responses in vitro and whether this in vitro
vaccine model could serve to identify immunogenic epitopes as potential
vaccine targets. Cultured DC were transfected with HIV-1 Nef plasmid
cDNA by particle-mediated gene transfer as described above. Expression
of HIV-1 Nef was confirmed in 15% of DC by immunohistochemical
staining with Nef-specific mAb (data not shown). Additionally, in
previous studies, transfection of cultured DC with cDNA encoding hIL-12
and/or IFN-
cDNA using a gene gun was observed to result in modest
levels of cytokine production (50150 pg/million DC/48 h), increased
expression of DC-associated costimulatory molecules, and enhanced
induction of tumor-reactive CTL in vitro 16 . We investigated whether
coinsertion of the plasmids encoding hIL-12 and hIFN-
with the
Nef-encoding plasmid could enhance the efficiency of induction of
Nef-specific CTL or alter the pattern of CTL epitopes recognized.
HIV-uninfected donors expressing the common HLA class I molecules
HLA-A2, HLA-A3, or HLA-B7 were initially evaluated as responders. Using
bioballistic gene transfer, cultured DC were transfected with pCI-Nef
alone or with pCI-Nef plus IL-12 or IFN-
cDNA, irradiated, and used
to stimulate autologous responder T cells. Responder T cells were
restimulated with autologous DC expressing Nef, without coexpression of
IL-12 or IFN-
, and tested for the ability to lyse HLA-matched target
cells pulsed with defined Nef epitope peptides or overlapping, pooled
Nef peptides. CTL responses restricted by several different HLA class I
molecules and targeting to defined epitope peptides, as well as larger,
overlapping peptides, were noted in multiple individuals. Fig. 1
depicts the HLA-B7-restricted Nef
peptide-specific CTL responses induced by autologous DC engineered to
express Nef alone or to coexpress Nef and hIL-12 or hIFN-
during
priming. A response against only the P6 pool of peptides was noted
following stimulation with DC-Nef alone, whereas IL-12-primed T cells
responded to the P6 pool and weakly to the P2 peptide pool.
IFN-
-primed T cells did not respond strongly to the P6 peptides, but
instead displayed low level lysis of several other peptide pools.
These results suggest that in certain cases the addition of cytokines
to primary DC-T cell cocultures may result in differences in the
epitope specificity of the Ag-specific T cell responses generated.
These data may reflect differences in processing or presentation of
peptides under differing cytokine conditions or reflect skewing of the
T cell repertoire resulting from error in sampling of low frequency
responses.
|
, but not DC-Nef alone (Fig. 2
|
. Following three
stimulations with DC transfected with nef only, responder
cells were tested for their ability to kill targets expressing only
HLA-A2.1 (C1R.A2) when pulsed with the above epitope peptides. Nef
peptide-specific CTL responses (>10% specific lysis) were identified
in five of the nine donors, with two donors responding to two different
peptides (Table I
|
|
in enhancing the induction of such responses. Figs. 3
during the primary
stimulation led to detection of stronger CTL responses and that the
pattern of epitope specificity generated under all conditions was
similar. As shown in Fig. 4
|

DCs have been reported to have the ability to process exogenous
proteins for presentation by MHC class I Ags 27, 28 . We therefore
sought to determine whether primary class I-restricted responses to the
HIV-1 Nef protein could be induced by DC pulsed with recombinant
protein and whether induction in the presence of recombinant
Th1-biasing cytokines would enhance or alter this process. DC cultured
from HIV-seronegative donors were pulsed with recombinant HIV-1 Nef
protein, irradiated, and used as APC to stimulate autologous
nonadherent T cells as described in Materials and Methods.
Responder cells were restimulated weekly with irradiated, Nef
protein-pulsed DC and maintained in media with low dose rhIL-2.
HIV-specific cytotoxicity was evaluated using HLA-matched or partially
matched B-LCL pulsed with defined minimal Nef epitope peptides or with
pools of larger peptides spanning the entire Nef protein sequence
(P1P6). MHC class I or class II restriction of responses was
determined either by using targets matched only at certain class I
alleles or by blocking with anti-MHC I monomorphic (W6/32) or MHC
II monomorphic (L243) mAbs. Strong MHC class II-restricted responses to
HIV Nef were noted in the majority of donors tested (data not shown;
C. C. Wilson, manuscript in preparation), and Nef-specific CTL
responses were detected in three of six donors tested. Significant CTL
responses were generally first noted after two or three rounds
of stimulation, with marked enhancement of responses noted after
four or five stimulations. The majority of responder T cells
stimulated in this fashion were CD3+CD4+
(7090% after three stimulations), but one donor generated
primarily a CD3+CD8+ T cell response in
response to stimulation with DC pulsed with Nef protein (Fig. 5
A). Fig. 5
A
illustrates HLA-A3-restricted killing of target cells pulsed with a
previously identified Nef peptide (Nef 7384, QVPLRPMTYK) by T cells
from an HLA-A3+, B7+ HIV-seronegative
donor, after five stimulations with DC pulsed with rNef
protein. The B7-restricted peptide (Nef 128137, TPGPGVRYPL)
determined to be an immunodominant epitope in HIV-infected individuals
24 was not recognized by this bulk T cell population.
|
to the cultures,
in concentrations similar to those expressed by gene gun-transfected
DC, only during the initial stimulation, led to the subsequent
enhancement of HIV peptide pool-specific CTL responses, as depicted in
a representative assay in Fig. 5
. Although minimal
epitope specificities were not mapped in this case, it is interesting
to note that both previously identified A11-restricted Nef epitopes,
Nef 7582 (PLRPMTYK) and Nef 8492 (AVDLSHFLK) 17, 29 , are located
within the P3 pool of Nef epitopes tested. Mechanism of cytokine-mediated enhancement of DC-dependent T cell induction
To determine the mechanism by which IL-12 and IFN-
enhanced the
induction of HIV-specific T cell responses in this system, we evaluated
the effect of each cytokine on T cell and DC phenotype. T cells
stimulated with DC transfected with the nef gene or pulsed
with Nef protein were predominantly of CD3+CD4+
phenotype (80 ± 11%, 74 ± 16% respectively). As
previously described, T cell cultures induced by DC cotransfected with
IL-12 or IFN-
cDNA and tumor Ag cDNA displayed cytokine-dependent
phenotypic changes 16 . In these experiments, the coexpression or
addition of IL-12 to DC at the time of T cell priming led to a
significant (95% confidence, Students t test) expansion
of CD8+ T cells, markedly reducing the calculated CD4:CD8
ratio after three stimulations (Table II
). Despite the addition of IL-12 during
T cell priming, the majority of DC-stimulated cultures still contained
a predominance of CD4+ T cells (absolute CD4:CD8 ratio
> 1) (Table II
legend). IFN-
, expressed or added during priming of
T cells, had a minimal effect on subsequent T cell phenotype, only
slightly increasing the CD4:CD8 ratio in most cases (Table II
).
|
with
tumor Ag in DC by bioballistic gene transfer led to phenotypic changes
in the DC, with up-regulation of MHC and costimulatory molecules most
markedly following expression of IFN-
. In these experiments, we
observed that the addition of rIFN-
to DC cultures also up-regulated
expression of CD40, CD80, CD86, and MHC I and II on
GM-CSF/IL-4-cultured DC, whereas rIL-12 had little or no impact on DC
phenotype, even at concentrations of up to 10 ng/ml cytokine (Fig. 6
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
genes during priming 16 . In
this study, we evaluated the effect of IL-12 and IFN-
on the in
vitro priming of Nef-specific T cell responses by DC using different Ag
loading strategies. Exogenous or expressed cytokines were only present
during the initial stimulation ("priming"), to ensure that the
measured effects were on T cell induction and not directly on effector
function (assessed after several restimulations) and also to simulate a
prime-boost vaccine approach. The data show that the addition of IL-12
or IFN-
at the time of initial, or primary, T cell induction with DC
+ Ag increased the likelihood that an Ag-specific CTL response would be
detected after multiple stimulations. This enhancement of CTL
reactivity occurred regardless of the mode of Ag loading and likely
resulted from either a preferential outgrowth or activation of
Ag-specific CD8+ effector cells. The presence of the
cytokine only during the primary stimulation would be unlikely to have
a direct effect on effector function after several restimulations in
the absence of exogenous cytokine. There are a number of mechanisms by
which this effect on CTL reactivity might be achieved, and it is likely
that IL-12 and IFN-
achieve similar results by very different
mechanisms. IL-12 and IFN-
, both shown to be produced by activated
DCs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 , are known to bias toward Th1-type, or cell-mediated,
immune responses 43, 44, 45, 46 . IL-12 is known to be a potent inducer of
cytokines, such as IFN-
, that may positively influence the
development, survival, and ultimately effector function of
CD8+ CTL (reviewed in 47 . The results presented here
show that the addition of IL-12 during DC priming of naive T cells
resulted in a significant increase in the relative number of
CD8+ T cells in culture and suggests a more direct role of
IL-12 in enhancing T cell function than in enhancing APC function.
IFN-
, on the other hand, increased CTL induction while maintaining
or increasing the relative number of CD4+ T cell
responders. This effect of IFN-
may be related to its ability to
significantly increase the surface expression of DC-associated Ags that
play a critical role in the induction of Ag-specific T cell responses
(reviewed in 30 by enhancing DC differentiation or maturation
48 . IFN-
has also been shown to prolong CD8+ T cell
survival 49 and may promote CTL development by blocking Th2 cytokine
production 45, 50 or promoting T cell help necessary for CTL
induction. In rare cases, it also appeared that the addition of IFN-
or IL-12 during primary T cell induction resulted in responder T cells
with altered epitope specificity. It is possible that this effect may
be mediated through changes in DC maturation (as revealed by phenotypic
changes), as we observed with IFN-
, or indirectly, as with IL-12,
via IFN-
effects on proteosome subunit expression 51 , ultimately
resulting in the differential processing and MHC presentation of
antigenic epitopes. Epitope immunodominance in a vaccine setting is likely to be determined by a number of factors, including Ag format, route, Ag dose, and the MHC background of the recipient 52, 53, 54 . Without a directly comparable animal model for HIV-1 vaccine development, identification of immunodominant epitopes as potential vaccine targets has been difficult. A relative measure of immunogenicity can be determined by measuring MHC class I binding of epitope peptides 23 or in vivo studies of potential CTL epitopes in HLA transgenic mice 55, 56 , but it is clear that factors other than MHC binding determine in vivo immunogenicity 57 . A large number of MHC class I-restricted CTL epitopes have been identified in HIV-infected individuals 21 , yet viral variation and the associated selection pressure placed on the immune response make it difficult to know with certainty which of the defined epitopes would be recognized following a given immunization approach in uninfected individuals. DCs, potent APC located in skin and lymphoid organs, are likely to play a major role naturally in promoting immune responses generated using most vaccine formats. Therefore, an understanding of the constraints of processing and presentation of HIV Ags by DC should prove critical in designing effective vaccine strategies against HIV-1. Our results suggest that this DC-based system may provide a relevant means of determining which CTL epitopes in HIV-1 are likely to be recognized using a given vaccine format and may aid in determining factors that influence immunogenicity. This information may not necessarily be predicted using standard in vitro assays of immunogenicity or peptide binding to HLA molecules 57 . For instance, Nef 190198 is recognized by T cells primed by DC in vitro as well as by T cells isolated from HIV-infected individuals, despite the low binding affinity of this peptide for HLA-A2 as measured in peptide binding assays. This suggests that, in certain cases, in vitro assays of peptide binding to HLA molecules may not reflect the true HLA binding capacity or immunogenicity of naturally processed peptides. Since no in vitro system can possibly reflect the complexity of the in vivo immune response to a vaccine, it will be important to confirm that the immunogenicity of epitopes identified by this in vitro system are truly reflective of in vivo immunogenicity.
In summary, our results show that this DC in vitro stimulation system may be effectively used to evaluate the impact of altering important vaccine parameters, such as Ag format and biologic adjuvants, on the relative strength and epitope specificity of bulk Ag-specific CTL responses generated under each condition. Results of these studies, which incorporate DC-produced, Th1-biasing cytokines as adjuvants, should aid in understanding the mechanisms by which DC mediate the induction of Ag-specific T cells. Information gained using this system may also aid in the development of prophylactic vaccines for HIV-1 by identifying the appropriate antigenic format and biologic adjuvant, such as Th1-biasing cytokines, required for the optimal activation of a protective CTL repertoire. Successful in vitro vaccine approaches may also more directly serve as a basis for clinical DC-based therapeutic vaccines in HIV-1-infected individuals.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Cara Wilson, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Box 168, 4200 E. 9th Avenue, Denver, CO 80262. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage CSF; DC, dendritic cell; B-LCL, B-lymphoblastoid cell line; PE, phycoerythrin; MFC, mean fluorescence channel. ![]()
Received for publication July 15, 1998. Accepted for publication November 13, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production by T helper 1 cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:659.[Medline]
. J. Immunol. 160:1139.
increases the frequency of interferon
-producing human CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 178:1655.
selectively inhibits the production of interleukin-5 by human CD4+ T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 97:309.[Medline]
and interleukin-12. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:2656.[Medline]
and IFN-
in IL-12-induced T helper cell-1 development. J. Immunol. 156:1442.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. A. Colleton, X.-L. Huang, N. M. Melhem, Z. Fan, L. Borowski, G. Rappocciolo, and C. R. Rinaldo Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Specific CD8+ T-Cell Responses Induced by Myeloid Dendritic Cells J. Virol., June 15, 2009; 83(12): 6288 - 6299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Van Gulck, G. Vanham, L. Heyndrickx, S. Coppens, K. Vereecken, D. Atkinson, E. Florence, I. Kint, Z. N. Berneman, and V. V. Tendeloo Efficient In Vitro Expansion of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Specific T-Cell Responses by gag mRNA-Electroporated Dendritic Cells from Treated and Untreated HIV Type 1-Infected Individuals J. Virol., April 1, 2008; 82(7): 3561 - 3573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. A. Van Gulck, P. Ponsaerts, L. Heyndrickx, K. Vereecken, F. Moerman, A. De Roo, R. Colebunders, G. Van den Bosch, D. R. Van Bockstaele, V. F. I. Van Tendeloo, et al. Efficient stimulation of HIV-1-specific T cells using dendritic cells electroporated with mRNA encoding autologous HIV-1 Gag and Env proteins Blood, March 1, 2006; 107(5): 1818 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hirano, M. O. Butler, Z. Xia, S. Ansen, M. S. von Bergwelt-Baildon, D. Neuberg, G. J. Freeman, and L. M. Nadler Engagement of CD83 ligand induces prolonged expansion of CD8+ T cells and preferential enrichment for antigen specificity Blood, February 15, 2006; 107(4): 1528 - 1536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Walter, L. Herrgen, O. Schoor, G. Jung, D. Wernet, H.-J. Buhring, H.-G. Rammensee, and S. Stevanovic Cutting Edge: Predetermined Avidity of Human CD8 T Cells Expanded on Calibrated MHC/Anti-CD28-Coated Microspheres J. Immunol., November 15, 2003; 171(10): 4974 - 4978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Konopitzky, U. Konig, R. G. Meyer, W. Sommergruber, T. Wolfel, and T. Schweighoffer Identification of HLA-A*0201-Restricted T Cell Epitopes Derived from the Novel Overexpressed Tumor Antigen Calcium-Activated Chloride Channel 2 J. Immunol., July 1, 2002; 169(1): 540 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. von Bergwelt-Baildon, R. H. Vonderheide, B. Maecker, N. Hirano, K. S. Anderson, M. O. Butler, Z. Xia, W. Y. Zeng, K. W. Wucherpfennig, L. M. Nadler, et al. Human primary and memory cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses are efficiently induced by means of CD40-activated B cells as antigen-presenting cells: potential for clinical application Blood, May 1, 2002; 99(9): 3319 - 3325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Ansari, A. E. Mayne, J. B. Sundstrom, P. Bostik, B. Grimm, J. D. Altman, and F. Villinger Administration of Recombinant Rhesus Interleukin-12 during Acute Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) Infection Leads to Decreased Viral Loads Associated with Prolonged Survival in SIVmac251-Infected Rhesus Macaques J. Virol., February 15, 2002; 76(4): 1731 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lu and J.-M. Andrieu In Vitro Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication by Autologous CD8+ T Cells Expanded with Inactivated-Virus-Pulsed Dendritic Cells J. Virol., October 1, 2001; 75(19): 8949 - 8956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Hogan and S. M. Hammer Host Determinants in HIV Infection and Disease: Part 2: Genetic Factors and Implications for Antiretroviral Therapeutics Ann Intern Med, May 15, 2001; 134(10): 978 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Weissman, H. Ni, D. Scales, A. Dude, J. Capodici, K. McGibney, A. Abdool, S. N. Isaacs, G. Cannon, and K. Kariko HIV Gag mRNA Transfection of Dendritic Cells (DC) Delivers Encoded Antigen to MHC Class I and II Molecules, Causes DC Maturation, and Induces a Potent Human In Vitro Primary Immune Response J. Immunol., October 15, 2000; 165(8): 4710 - 4717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Hodge, A. N. Rad, D. W. Grosenbach, H. Sabzevari, A. G. Yafal, L. Gritz, and J. Schlom Enhanced Activation of T Cells by Dendritic Cells Engineered to Hyperexpress a Triad of Costimulatory Molecules J Natl Cancer Inst, August 2, 2000; 92(15): 1228 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Dong, B. An, L. Salvucci Kierstead, W. J. Storkus, A. A. Amoscato, and R. D. Salter Modification of the Amino Terminus of a Class II Epitope Confers Resistance to Degradation by CD13 on Dendritic Cells and Enhances Presentation to T Cells J. Immunol., January 1, 2000; 164(1): 129 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Dong, W. J. Storkus, and R. D. Salter Binding and Uptake of Agalactosyl IgG by Mannose Receptor on Macrophages and Dendritic Cells J. Immunol., November 15, 1999; 163(10): 5427 - 5434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |