The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Josien, R.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Josien, R.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, Y.
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 162: 2562-2568.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

TRANCE, a TNF Family Member, Is Differentially Expressed on T Cell Subsets and Induces Cytokine Production in Dendritic Cells1

Régis Josien2,3,*, Brian R. Wong2,{dagger}, Hong-Li Li*, Ralph M. Steinman* and Yongwon Choi4,{dagger},{ddagger}

* Laboratory of Cellular Physiology and Immunology, {dagger} Laboratory of Immunology, and {ddagger} Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TNF-related activation-induced cytokine (TRANCE) is a member of the TNF family recently identified in activated T cells. We report here that TRANCE mRNA is constitutively expressed in memory, but not naive, T cells and in single-positive thymocytes. Upon TCR/CD3 stimulation, TRANCE mRNA and surface protein expression are rapidly up-regulated in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, which can be further enhanced on CD4+ T cells by CD28-mediated costimulation. However, TRANCE induction is significantly suppressed when cells are stimulated in the presence of IL-4, but is not modified in the presence of IFN-{alpha}, IFN-{gamma}, TGF-ß, TNF-{alpha}, or IL-2. High levels of TRANCE receptor expression are found on mature dendritic cells (DCs). In this study we show that activated T and B cells also express TRANCE receptor, but only at low levels. TRANCE, however, does not exert any significant effect on the proliferation, activation, or survival of those cells. In DCs, TRANCE induces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1) and T cell growth and differentiation factors (IL-12, IL-15) in addition to enhancing DC survival. Moreover, TRANCE cooperates with CD40 ligand or TNF-{alpha} to further increase the viability of DCs, suggesting that several TNF-related molecules on activated T cells may cooperatively regulate the function and survival of DCs to enhance T cell-mediated immune responses.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The TNF and TNF receptor families of proteins play critical roles in the initiation and regulation of the immune response 1 . These proteins enable a complex dialogue to occur between cells within the immune system and with cells of other tissues. Despite the apparent redundancy of the TNF/TNF receptor family as evidenced by the continually growing number of discovered ligand/receptor pairs and by the common signaling transducers used by the receptors, the specific function of these family members clearly exist, as shown by gene knockout studies in which the deletion of one family member cannot be fully compensated by the others 1 . Specificity may be achieved by restricting their expression to particular cells and/or by linking their signal transducing effectors to cell-specific signaling pathways.

T cells can modulate the function of dendritic cells (DC),5 APCs specialized in the activation of naive T cells 2 , via TNF-related molecules. CD40L, a CD4+ T cell-restricted molecule, was shown to induce differentiation, cytokine production (TNF-{alpha}, IL-8, IL-12, and MIP{alpha}), and protection from spontaneous apoptosis in DC 3, 4, 5, 6 . TNF was also shown to enhance DC survival in vitro 7 . IL-12-producing DC were shown to skew the response of T cells toward the Th1 phenotype 8, 9 , suggesting that CD4+ T cells express CD40L to adjust the type of response (Th1 vs Th2) by controlling DC function.

Recently, we showed that TRANCE (TNF-related activation-induced cytokine), a member of the TNF family 10 also called receptor-activating NF-{kappa}B-ligand 11 , is a DC survival factor that regulates the expression of the anti-apoptotic molecule, Bcl-xL 12 . We and others initially reported that TRANCE expression appears restricted to T cells, whereas high levels of TRANCE-R are expressed on mature DC, suggesting that TRANCE/TRANCE-R interactions are involved with T cell-DC communication 10, 11, 12 . Recently, however, TRANCE expression was also detected on osteoblasts and was shown to be required for osteoclast differentiation from myeloid progenitors 13, 14 (our unpublished observations). In addition, a soluble decoy receptor (osteoprotegerin (OPG)/osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor (OCIF)) for TRANCE can block TRANCE-mediated osteoclast differentiation and may therefore modulate T cell-DC interactions 15 .

In this paper we show that both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, when activated through the TCR/CD3 complex, express high levels of TRANCE, and its expression is strongly enhanced by CD28-mediated costimulation on CD4+ T cells. In addition, we show that TRANCE has no significant effect on activated T and B cells, although they can express low levels of TRANCE-R when activated. TRANCE can up-regulate both proinflammatory cytokines and factors in DCs that mediate T cell growth and differentiation, a property shared with CD40L. Moreover, TRANCE cooperates with CD40L or TNF-{alpha} to enhance the survival of DCs. Therefore, TRANCE is likely to play an important role in the regulation of T cell responses by controlling the lymphocyte stimulatory capacity of DC.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression and purification of soluble TRANCE-R-Fc and hCD8-TRANCE

To create a TRANCE-R-Fc recombinant molecule (TR-Fc), the Fc portion of hIgG1 was fused to the C-terminal end of the extracellular domain of the murine TRANCE-R (also called receptor-activating NF-{kappa}B) 11 and produced in a baculovirus expression system according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BaculoGold, PharMingen, San Diego. CA). TR-Fc was purified from the culture supernatants on protein A-Sepharose bead (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). hCD8-TRANCE was prepared as previously described 12 .

Determination of the specificity of hCD8-TRANCE and TR-Fc

293T cells grown in DMEM/10% FCS were transfected with expression vectors containing mTRANCE cDNA, mTRANCE-R, or mFas cDNA by calcium phosphate precipitation. Cells were incubated with 10 µg/ml of hCD8-TRANCE or 5 µg/ml of TR-Fc, and binding was revealed by FACS as described below.

Mice

C57BL/6 (H-2b) and BALB/c (H-2d) mice were obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY).

Medium

The culture medium used was RPMI 1640 supplemented with heat-inactivated 5% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES, and 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME.

Cells

Mature bone-marrow derived DC (BMDC) were generated as described previously 16 and were used on day 8 of culture. Splenic DC were isolated as previously described 17 and cultured overnight to induce maturation. Lymph node T cells (>=99% CD3+ as assessed by flow cytometry) were prepared by magnetic bead depletion (Dynal, Oslo, Norway) of class II-, B220-, NK1.1-, and F4/80-positive cells. Th1 and Th2 clones derived from DO11.10 TCR transgenic mice, tested by intracellular staining of IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-{gamma}, were provided by Drs. Dan Littman and Isabelle Riviere (The Skirball Institute, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY). The Th1 clones were IL-4- IL-10- IFN{gamma}+, and the Th2 clones were IL-4+ IL-10+ IFN-{gamma}-. B cells (>=94% B220+) were prepared from spleen cells by magnetic bead depletion of Thy-1.2-positive cells (Dynal). Cell viability was assayed by trypan blue exclusion or propidium iodide uptake.

Flow cytometry

The expression of TRANCE on activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was assessed using the TR-Fc fusion protein at 5 µg/ml followed by FITC-conjugated goat anti-hIgG (Fc-specific) F(ab')2 fragment (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). The negative control consisted of normal hIgG1 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). T cell and thymocyte subsets were sorted using a FACS Vantage (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).

RT-PCR analysis

For semiquantitative PCR analysis, total RNA was extracted from FACS-sorted T cell subsets (RNA Isolation Kit, Stratagene, CA) cultured in 24-well plates coated with or without anti-CD3 (145-2C11; 10 µg/ml) for 3.5 h and subjected to RT-PCR as previously described 10 . The following primers were used: hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT): sense, 5'-GTA ATG ATC AGT CAA CGG GGG AC-3'; antisense, 5'-CCA GCA AGC TTG CAA CCT TAA CCA-3'; TRANCE: sense, 5'-CCT GAG ACT CCA TGA AAA CGC-3'; antisense, 5'-TAA CCC TTA GTT TTC CGT TGC-3'; and CD40L: sense, 5'-GTG GCA ACT GGA CTT CCA GCG-3'; antisense, 5'-GCG TTG ACT CGA AGG CTC CCG-3'. The PCR products were analyzed by Southern blot as previously described 10 .

Ribonuclease protection assays

Total RNA was obtained from 1 x 107 BMDC (RNA isolation kit, Stratagene, CA) treated for 12 h with hCD8-TRANCE (1–5 µg/ml), a 1/100 dilution of murine CD8-CD40L baculoviral supernatants, or an equivalent volume of PBS. Five micrograms of RNA from each sample was hybridized to a 32P-labeled antisense RNA probe set (mCK-1, mCK-2, mCK-3, mAPO-2; PharMingen) and digested with RNase and T1 nuclease, and the protected probe fragments were resolved on 5% polyacrylamide gels according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Band intensity was quantified by phosphorimaging (Molecular Imager System, Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) and normalized to the intensity of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) probe.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Regulation of TRANCE mRNA expression in T cells

TRANCE mRNA expression was measured in sorted naive (CD44low) and memory (CD44high) lymph node T cell subsets and in various thymocyte populations (Fig. 1Go). Purified T cells and thymocytes were stimulated with anti-CD3 mAb or were left unstimulated for 3.5 h, and levels of TRANCE mRNA were assessed by semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 1Go). Resting CD8+ and CD4+ memory cells expressed high levels of TRANCE, whereas resting naive CD8+ and CD4+ T cells did not express TRANCE mRNA. Upon CD3 stimulation, all T cell subsets up-regulated TRANCE, with the highest levels observed in CD3-stimulated memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets. CD40L mRNA expression was also examined and, consistent with a previous report, was up-regulated in activated CD4+ naive and memory T cells 18 . In contrast, CD40L mRNA expression was very weak in CD8+ T cells (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. RT-PCR analysis of TRANCE mRNA expression in thymocytes and peripheral T cell subsets. Lymph node T cells (LNTC) were sorted by FACS based on CD4, CD8, or CD44 expression. Naive and memory T cells were identified as CD44- and CD44+, respectively. Thymocytes were sorted into single positive (SP; CD4+CD8- and CD4-CD8+) and double positive (DP; CD4+CD8+) populations. The LNTC-sorted populations (1 x 106) were stimulated on anti-CD3 mAb-coated plates or were left unstimulated for 3.5 h before their RNA was harvested. RT-PCR followed by Southern blot analysis with 32P-labeled cDNA revealed the expression of TRANCE, CD40L, and HPRT. HPRT levels normalized the amount of cDNA template used in each PCR reaction.

 
Although TRANCE was not expressed in resting peripheral T cells, we could detect substantial levels of TRANCE mRNA in single-positive CD4+CD8- and CD4-CD8+ thymocytes. In contrast, CD40L was restricted to CD4+CD8- thymocytes (Fig. 1Go). This suggests that TRANCE and CD40L are transiently expressed upon maturation of thymocytes 19 .

Regulation of TRANCE protein expression on the surface of T cells

TR-Fc fusion protein that could specifically recognize TRANCE-transfected 293T cells, but not 293T cells transfected with vector alone (Fig. 2GoA) was used to detect surface TRANCE expression on T cells. TRANCE was not detected on resting CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3Go). On CD4+ T cells, surface TRANCE expression was detected as soon as 4 h after anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 stimulation, peaked around 48 h, and remained high at least until 96 h (Fig. 3Go). The kinetics of TRANCE expression on CD8+ T cells were slower than those on CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells expressed lower levels of TRANCE than CD4+ T when stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 mAbs (Figs. 3Go and 4Go). However, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 in the absence of costimulation expressed similar low levels of TRANCE (Fig. 4Go). Indeed, anti-CD28 mAb-mediated costimulation greatly enhanced TRANCE expression on CD4+, but not significantly on CD8+, T cells (Fig. 4Go). To determine whether TRANCE expression is restricted to Th subsets, Th1 and Th2 clones derived from DO11.10 TCR transgenic mice were stained with TR-Fc. As shown in Fig. 5Go, TRANCE was not detected on resting clones, but was strongly up-regulated on both Th1 and Th2 clones after anti-CD3 stimulation, although the Th1 clones consistently expressed higher levels than the Th2 clones.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Specificity of hCD8-mTRANCE and TRANCE-R-Fc fusion molecules. 293-T cells transfected with vector alone (pcDNA), vector containing mTRANCE, or the extracellular domain of TRANCE-R and stable cell lines were cloned by limiting dilution. A, Cells transfected with pFlag-CMV-1 of pFlag-CMV-1/mTRANCE were incubated with 5 µg/ml of TRANCE. R-Fc (solid line) or normal hIgG1 (dotted line) followed by FITC-conjugated anti-human Fc. B, Cells transfected with pcDNA or pcDNA/TRANCE-R were incubated with 10 µg/ml hCD8-mTRANCE (solid line) followed by biotinylated anti-human CD8 and streptavidin-phycoerythrin. Negative control cells were incubated with the secondary Ab alone (dotted line). Cells were analyzed on a FACScan.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Kinetics of TRANCE expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells activated by anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. Purified lymph node T cells were cultured in anti-CD3-coated (10 µg/ml) 96-well plates for the indicated amount of time in the presence of 2.5 µg/ml of anti-CD28 mAb. Subsequently, cells were double stained with anti-CD4-phycoerythrin or CD8-phycoerythrin, and TR-Fc or control hIgG1 (5 µg/ml) followed by FITC-goat anti-hIgG F(ab')2, and binding was analyzed by FACS. Histograms reveal the binding of TR-Fc (solid line) or hIgG1 (dotted line) on CD4+ and CD8+ gated cells. One representative experiment of four is shown.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. The effect of CD28-mediated costimulation on TRANCE expression on CD3-activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Purified lymph node T cells were cultured as described in Fig. 3Go in the presence or the absence of anti-CD28 mAb (2.5 µg/ml). TRANCE expression was assessed after 72 h of culture. One representative experiment of five is shown.

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. The expression of TRANCE by Th1 and Th2 clones. Resting or anti-CD3-activated (48 h) Th1 and Th2 clones derived from DO11.10 transgenic mice were stained with TR.R-Fc as described above. Representative results of two independent experiments are shown.

 
To further analyze the regulation of TRANCE expression on activated T cells, we tested the effects of several cytokines. Purified T cells were stimulated for 60 h in the presence or the absence of cytokines. Among the different cytokines tested, we found that IL-4 (20 ng/ml) significantly inhibited the expression of TRANCE on activated CD4+ but not CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6Go). In contrast, TGF-ß1 (1 ng/ml), IFN-{alpha} (1000 U/ml), IFN-{gamma} (100 U/ml), IL-2 (50 U/ml), TNF-{alpha} (50 ng/ml), or LT-{alpha} (50 ng/ml) had no significant effect on TRANCE expression (data not shown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6. IL-4 down-regulates TRANCE expression on activated CD4+ T cells. Purified lymph node T cells were cultured as described above in the presence or the absence of anti-CD28 mAb (2.5 µg/ml) and in the presence or the absence of murine rIL-4 (20 ng/ml). TRANCE expression was assessed after 72 h of culture. The results of one representative experiment of four are shown.

 
TRANCE-R is expressed on activated T and B cells

We previously showed that high levels of TRANCE-R are expressed on mature DC 12 . Since TRANCE-R has also been detected on activated human T cells 11 , and TRANCE can activate c-Jun N-terminal kinase in thymocytes 12 , we analyzed its expression on murine T cells using the hCD8-mTRANCE fusion molecule (Fig. 2BGo) and FACS analysis (Fig. 7Go). As previously reported 12 , resting T cells did not show any detectable TRANCE-R expression on their surfaces (Fig. 7GoA). However, when T cells were stimulated with anti-CD3, low levels of TRANCE-R were detected only after 48 h of simulation and were not further increased by anti-CD28-mediated costimulation. TRANCE-R expression was not enhanced by IL-4 and/or TGF-ß1 (Fig. 7GoA) despite a previous study showing that these cytokines enhance the expression of TRANCE-R on activated human T cells 11 . In addition, TRANCE did not have any effect on the survival or primary or secondary proliferative responses of murine CD4+ or CD8+ T cells despite significant TRANCE-R expression on those cells (data not shown). TRANCE-R expression were also detected on activated B cells (Fig. 7GoB). TRANCE-R expression was detected 24 h after stimulation and peaked at 48 h. Moreover, TRANCE-R expression was significantly enhanced by CD40 cross-linking on B cells, but only slightly by anti-µ and IL-4. This stimulatory requirement of TRANCE-R expression on B cells was similar to that of Fas expression (Fig. 7GoB). The level of expression of TRANCE-R on mature DCs was consistently >10-fold the expression on activated B cells (data not shown). TRANCE had no effect on proliferation, the expression of surface activation/adhesion markers, or survival of B cells stimulated to express TRANCE-R (data not shown).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 7. Activated T and B cells express low levels of TRANCE-R. A, Purified lymph node T cells were cultured in anti-CD3 coated (10 µg/ml) 96-well plate in the presence or the absence of anti-CD28 mAb (2.5 µg/ml), rIL-4 (20 ng/ml), and TGF-ß1 (1 ng/ml). TRANCE-R expression was assessed after 60 h of culture using the hCD8-mTRANCE fusion molecule as described in Materials and Methods. TRANCE-R expression was detected only after 48 h of simulation. B, Purified spleen B cells were cultured in a 96-well plate in medium alone or in the presence of soluble CD40L (1/100 dilution of insect cell supernatant) or anti-µ chain Ab (0.5 µg/ml) and rIL-4 (20 ng/ml). After 48 h of culture cells were stained for CD40, CD95 (Fas), TRANCE-R, and B7-2. Maximal levels of expression were detected between 24 and 60 h of stimulation. One representative experiment of three is shown.

 
TRANCE induces cytokine production in DC

TRANCE and CD40L can up-regulate Bcl-xL expression and protect DC against spontaneous apoptosis in vitro 12 . In addition to its survival-enhancing function in DC, CD40L can induce IL-12 4, 6, 9, 20 and IL-18 expression 21 , which, in turn, can promote a Th1-mediated immune response 9 and an array of cytokines involved in T cell activation (IL-1, IL-6, IL-15, and TNF-{alpha}) 21, 22 . To determine whether TRANCE plays a similar role in cytokine regulation, TRANCE- or PBS-treated DC were subjected to ribonuclease protection assays with probes specific for a variety of known cytokines (Fig. 8Go). TRANCE induces the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1ß, IL-1Ra, IL-6, and the T cell- and NK cell-activating cytokine, IL-15 (Fig. 8Go). TRANCE also up-regulates the mRNA encoding the p40 subunit of IL-12. In this assay, IL-12 p35 mRNA was not detected, probably because the steady state level of p35 mRNA was below the limit of detection. TRANCE had no apparent effect on the expression of IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-10, IL-1{alpha}, TNF-{alpha}, TNF-ß (leukotriene-{alpha}), leukotriene-ß, IFN-{gamma}, or IFN-ß (Fig. 8Go). By the same method, we showed that CD40L, similar to TRANCE, up-regulated the expression of IL-1ß, IL-1Ra, IL-6, IL-12 p40 (but not p35), and IL-15 (data not shown). However, TRANCE and CD40L differed in the regulation of TGF-ß expression; TRANCE induced TGF-ß2 expression and down-regulated TGF-ß1 (Fig. 8Go), whereas CD40L up-regulated both TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß2 (data not shown).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 8. TRANCE induces an array of cytokines in BMDC. A, RNA was extracted from PBS- and hCD8-TRANCE (2.5 µg/ml)-treated BMDC and subjected to ribonuclease protection assays as described in Materials and Methods to measure levels of IL-1{alpha}, IL-1ß, IL-1Ra IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-15, IL-1{alpha}, MIF, TNF-{alpha}, TNF-ß (leukotriene-{alpha}), leukotriene-ß, IFN-{gamma}, or IFN-ß mRNA. Yeast transfer RNA controlled for non-specific probe protection. Representative results of two independent experiments are shown. B, The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) signal was used to control for the amount of input RNA and to quantify the relative expression of cytokine mRNA by phosphorimaging.

 
TRANCE cooperates with CD40L and TNF-{alpha} to enhance the survival of DC

Since activated CD4+ T cells express both TRANCE and CD40L, and both TRANCE-R and CD40 can activate similar signal transducing pathways (e.g., JNK and NF-{kappa}B), we hypothesized that during a T cell-DC interaction both ligands could cooperatively enhance DC survival. As shown in Fig. 9Go, TRANCE or CD40L alone weakly enhanced the survival of mature splenic DC relative to their more striking effects on BMDC. The simultaneous addition of both ligands together, however, inhibited cell death to a greater degree than either ligand alone (Fig. 9Go). TNF could also prevent spontaneous apoptosis as previously described 23 and cooperates with TRANCE to enhance splenic DC survival (Fig. 9Go). Granulocyte-macrophage CSF, a cytokine required for DC differentiation, had little effect on splenic DC survival; however, its effect was significantly amplified when administered with TRANCE (Fig. 9Go). The cooperative effects of TRANCE, CD40L, and TNF-{alpha} on DC survival were also observed with BMDC (Fig. 9Go).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 9. In vitro survival of mature DC. Mature bone marrow or splenic DC were incubated in medium with combinations of granulocyte-macrophage CSF (10 ng/ml), mCD8-CD40L (1/100 dilution), hCD8-TRANCE (1 µg/ml), hIgG1 (10 µg/ml), TR-Fc (10 µg/ml), and mTNF-{alpha} (50 ng/ml) for 72 h (BMDC) or 24 h (spleen DC), and cell viability was measured by trypan blue exclusion. These concentrations of mCD8-CD40L, hCD8-TRANCE, and mTNF-{alpha} were found to be saturating for survival of BMDC. Representative results of three independent experiments are shown.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The data presented in this paper further extend our investigation of the role of TRANCE/TRANCE-R in the immune system. Previously, TRANCE was shown to enhance the survival of DCs, a property shared with CD40L 3, 12 . TRANCE and CD40L also appear restricted to T cells. Their similarities compelled us to compare their expression during T cell activation and their functions on DCs. We showed that TRANCE is expressed on both activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, with higher levels of expression observed on CD4+ T cells. In contrast, CD40L is expressed only on activated CD4+ cells. These results suggest that TRANCE may allow CD8+ T cells to modulate DC function independently of CD40L. TCR stimulation by itself is sufficient to induce TRANCE expression on T cells, which can be further increased by CD28-mediated costimulation on CD4+ T cells, but not significantly on CD8+ T cells. In contrast, CD28 costimulation does not modify the level but only the kinetics of expression of CD40L on activated CD4+ T cell 24, 25 . Moreover, the kinetics of TRANCE expression during CD4+ T cell activation are different from those described for CD40L 26 . Indeed, maximal levels of TRANCE expression are detected at 48 h after stimulation and persist for at least 2 days more, whereas CD40L protein has been shown to be rapidly expressed and then to wane within 16–24 h 26 . Therefore, TRANCE may act at later time point than CD40L during the CD4+ T cell-mediated immune response to regulate the functions of DCs. Interestingly, CD40 is expressed on both immature and mature DC and can signal DC maturation 2 , whereas TRANCE-R is only expressed on mature DC and does not appear to be important for DC maturation 12 .

We previously showed that TRANCE-R was not detected on resting T cells by FACS analysis 12 . Since a recent report indicates that TRANCE-R is expressed on activated human peripheral blood T cells when stimulated with IL-4 and/or TGF-ß1 11 , we have examined the expression of TRANCE-R on murine T cells. Similar to human T cells, we could detect TRANCE-R when murine T cells were activated. However, we did not find an effect of TRANCE on proliferation, costimulation, survival, or cell death in these cells, which contrasts with what was observed in human T cells 11 . These discrepancies could reflect functional differences between the human and mouse TRANCE-R in T cells and/or differences in culture and stimulation conditions. We recently showed that a soluble form of TRANCE can be shed from TRANCE-transfected 293 cells (data not shown). However, preliminary experiments have shown that TRANCE was not shed in vitro from activated T cells, suggesting that the relatively low level of TRANCE-R detected on activated T cells is not due a competitive block by soluble TRANCE produced by those cells. In addition, we showed here that activated B cells express low levels of TRANCE-R. Similar to activated T cells, the proliferation, survival, and phenotype of activated B cells were not affected by TRANCE. Although it remains possible that TRANCE has other effects on activated T or B cells, our data suggest that the major immune target cells for TRANCE are DCs as previously reported 12 . This is an important difference from CD40L, which has also a major effect on B cell function 27 .

In addition to its ability to enhance DC survival, TRANCE promotes the production of various cytokines (e.g., IL-12, IL-15, IL-1, and IL-6) in DCs. CD40L is known to be a major stimulus inducing IL-12 production by DC 4, 6 , a critical cytokine involved in Th1 differentiation 9 . However, neutralizing Abs to CD40L fail to completely block IL-12 production in an MLR with T cells and DC 6 , and CD40L knockout mice are still able to produce IL-12 28 . TRANCE also induces IL-12 production in DC, suggesting that it may complement CD40L in vivo to promote DC-mediated Th1 differentiation. Interestingly, IL-4, which is required for Th2 cell differentiation 29 , substantially inhibits TRANCE expression on activated CD4+ T cells. It is thus possible that IL-4-producing cells down-regulate TRANCE expression on T cells during T cell priming, leading to a decreased IL-12 production by DC and therefore decreased Th1 differentiation. Consistent with the potential role of TRANCE in enhancing Th1 responses and the effect of IL-4 on TRANCE expression are the lower levels of TRANCE on activated Th2 clones compared with the Th1 clones from DO11.10 mice. However, a more extensive analysis with additional Th1 and Th2 clones must be performed. The effect of various cytokines on CD40L expression has not been assessed precisely, and it remains to be determined whether IL-4 or IFN-{gamma} affects CD40L expression in murine T cells.

IL-15 is a cytokine that shares functional similarities and receptor chain usage with IL-2 30 . It is a mitogen for NK cells 31 and is a T cell growth factor 30 and chemoattractant 32 . Similar to human CD34+-derived DC, resting murine DC expressed very low levels of IL-15 mRNA 21 , which were dramatically up-regulated upon TRANCE-R or CD40 triggering. In addition, IL-15 can enhance the survival of activated T cells 33 and specifically activates memory CD8+ T cells 34 . This suggests a model in which activated/memory Th cells that express high levels of TRANCE promote their own survival by interacting with DC and inducing IL-15 production. Similarly to CD40L 21 , TRANCE can also trigger the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and IL-6, which can amplify the immune response initiated by DC. TRANCE and CD40L therefore behave similarly in their ability to enhance DC-mediated lymphocyte activation.

In this study we also showed that TRANCE and CD40L, both of which are expressed on CD4+ T cells, cooperate to enhance the survival of DCs. These results suggest that DC survival in vivo may use the combined action of several TNF family members, including TNF-{alpha}, which are likely to be provided by activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and those present in the local microenvironment.

In summary, our data strongly suggest that TRANCE, similarly to CD40L, is likely to regulate T cell responses by modulating the function and survival of DCs. Although CD40-CD40L interactions play a major role during T cell responses against various infectious agents, CD40L knockout mice remain able to mount protective immune response against certain pathogens (e.g., viruses) 35 . Therefore, it is possible that TRANCE is required to mount optimal or CD40L-independent T cell responses, a hypothesis currently under investigation.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Randolph J. Noelle (Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH) for kindly providing the mCD8-CD40L in insect cell culture supernatant; Frank Isdell for his help with FACS sorting; and Angela Santana, Yaneth Castellanos, and Masha Vologodskaia for their excellent technical assistance.


   Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Medical Scientist Training Program Grant GM07739 (to B.R.W.); National Institutes of Health Grants AI41082 (to Y.C.), AI13013 (to R.M.S.), and AI39672 (to R.M.S.); and in part by the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer and by a Charles H. Revson Fellowship in Biomedical Research (to R.J.). Y.C. is an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Back

2 R.J. and B.R.W. contributed equally to this report. Back

3 Current address: Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unit 437, Immeuble Jean Monnet, 30 bd. Jean Monnet, 44035 Nantes Cedex 01, France. Back

4 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Yongwon Choi, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., Box 295, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address: Back

5 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cells; CD40L, CD40 ligand; TRANCE, TNF-related activation-induced cytokine; TRANCE-R, TRANCE receptor; BMDC, bone marrow-derived DC; h, human; m, murine; HPRT, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase. Back

Received for publication September 21, 1998. Accepted for publication November 12, 1998.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Smith, C. A., T. Farrah, R. G. Goodwin. 1994. The TNF receptor superfamily of cellular and viral proteins: activation, costimulation, and death. Cell 76:959.[Medline]
  2. Banchereau, J., R. M. Steinman. 1998. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392:245.[Medline]
  3. Caux, C., C. Massacrier, B. Vanbervliet, B. Dubois, C. Van Kooten, I. Durand, J. Banchereau. 1994. Activation of human dendritic cells through CD40 cross-linking. J. Exp. Med. 180:1263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cella, M., D. Scheidegger, K. Palmer-Lehmann, P. Lane, A. Lanzavecchia, G. Alber. 1996. Ligation of CD40 on dendritic cells triggers production of high levels of interleukin-12 and enhances T cell stimulatory capacity: T-T help via APC activation. J. Exp. Med. 184:747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Flores-Romo, L., P. Bjorck, V. Duvert, C. van Kooten, S. Saeland, J. Banchereau. 1997. CD40 ligation on human cord blood CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors induces their proliferation and differentiation into functional dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 185:341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Koch, F., U. Stanzl, P. Jennewein, K. Janke, C. Heufler, E. Kämpgen, N. Romani, G. Schuler. 1996. High level IL-12 production by murine dendritic cells: upregulation via MHC and CD40 molecules and downregulation by IL-4 and IL-10. J. Exp. Med. 184:741.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ludewig, B., D. Graf, H. R. Gelderblom, Y. Becker, R. A. Kroczek, G. Pauli. 1995. Spontaneous apoptosis of dendritic cells is efficiently inhibited by TRAP (CD40-ligand) and TNF-{alpha}, but strongly enhanced by interleukin-10. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:1943.[Medline]
  8. Heufler, C., F. Koch, U. Stanzl, G. Topar, M. Wysocka, G. Trinchieri, A. Enk, R. M. Steinman, N. Romani, G. Schuler. 1996. Interleukin-12 is produced by dendritic cells and mediates T helper 1 development as well as interferon-{gamma} production by T helper 1 cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:659.[Medline]
  9. Macatonia, S. E., N. A. Hosken, M. Litton, P. Vieira, C. S. Hsieh, J. A. Culpepper, M. Wysocka, G. Trinchieri, K. M. Murphy, A. O’Garra. 1995. Dendritic cells produce IL-12 and direct the development of Th1 cells from naive CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 154:5071.[Abstract]
  10. Wong, B. R., J. Rho, J. Arron, E. Robinson, J. Orlinick, M. Chao, S. Kalachikov, E. Cayani, F. S. R. Bartlett, W. N. Frankel, et al 1997. TRANCE is a novel ligand of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family that activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase in T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272:25190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Anderson, D. M., E. Maraskovsky, W. L. Billingsley, W. C. Dougall, M. E. Tometsko, E. R. Roux, M. C. Teepe, R. F. DuBose, D. Cosman, L. Galibert. 1997. A homologue of the TNF receptor and its ligand enhance T-cell growth and dendritic-cell function. Nature 390:175.[Medline]
  12. Wong, B. R., R. Josien, S. Y. Lee, B. Sauter, H. L. Li, R. M. Steinman, Y. Choi. 1997. TRANCE (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-related activation-induced cytokine), a new TNF family member predominantly expressed in T cells, is a dendritic cell-specific survival factor. J. Exp. Med. 186:2075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Yasuda, H., N. Shima, N. Nakagawa, K. Yamaguchi, M. Kinosaki, S. Mochizuki, A. Tomoyasu, K. Yano, M. Goto, A. Murakami, et al 1998. Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Lacey, D. L., E. Timms, H. L. Tan, M. J. Kelley, C. R. Dunstan, T. Burgess, R. Elliott, A. Colombero, G. Elliott, S. Scully, et al 1998. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 93:165.[Medline]
  15. Simonet, W. S., D. L. Lacey, C. R. Dunstan, M. Kelley, M. S. Chang, R. Luthy, H. Q. Nguyen, S. Wooden, L. Bennett, T. Boone, et al 1997. Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell 89:309.[Medline]
  16. Inaba, K., M. Inaba, N. Romani, H. Aya, M. Deguchi, S. Ikehara, S. Muramatsu, R. M. Steinman. 1992. Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Exp. Med. 176:1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Steinman, R. M., G. Kaplan, M. D. Witmer, Z. A. Cohn. 1979. Identification of a novel cell type in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice. V. Purification of spleen dendritic cells, new surface markers, and maintenance in vitro. J. Exp. Med. 149:1.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Foy, T. M., A. Aruffo, J. Bajorath, J. E. Buhlmann, R. J. Noelle. 1996. Immune regulation by CD40 and its ligand GP39. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:591.[Medline]
  19. Foy, T. M., D. M. Page, T. J. Waldschmidt, A. Schoneveld, J. D. Laman, S. R. Masters, L. Tygrett, J. A. Ledbetter, A. Aruffo, E. Claassen, et al 1995. An essential role for gp39, the ligand for CD40, in thymic selection. J. Exp. Med. 182:1377.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kang, K., M. Kubin, K. D. Cooper, S. R. Lessin, G. Trinchieri, A. H. Rook. 1996. IL-12 synthesis by human Langerhans cells. J. Immunol. 156:1402.[Abstract]
  21. de Saint-Vis, B., I. Fugier-Vivier, C. Massacrier, C. Gaillard, B. Vanbervliet, S. Ait-Yahia, J. Banchereau, Y. J. Liu, S. Lebecque, C. Caux. 1998. The cytokine profile expressed by human dendritic cells is dependent on cell subtype and mode of activation. J. Immunol. 160:1666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Jonuleit, H., K. Wiedemann, G. Muller, J. Degwert, U. Hoppe, J. Knop, A. H. Enk. 1997. Induction of IL-15 messenger RNA and protein in human blood-derived dendritic cells: a role for IL-15 in attraction of T cells. J. Immunol. 158:2610.[Abstract]
  23. Ludewig, B., V. Henn, J. M. Schroder, D. Graf, R. A. Kroczek. 1996. Induction, regulation, and function of soluble TRAP (CD40 ligand) during interaction of primary CD4+ CD45RA+ T cells with dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:3137.[Medline]
  24. Klaus, S. J., L. M. Pinchuk, H. D. Ochs, C. L. Law, W. C. Fanslow, R. J. Armitage, E. A. Clark. 1994. Costimulation through CD28 enhances T cell-dependent B cell activation via CD40-CD40L interaction. J. Immunol. 152:5643.[Abstract]
  25. Johnson-Leger, C., J. Christensen, G. Klaus. 1998. CD28 co-stimulation stabilizes the expression of the CD40 ligand on T cells. Int. Immunol. 10:1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Roy, M., T. Waldschmidt, A. Aruffo, J. A. Ledbetter, R. J. Noelle. 1993. The regulation of the expression of gp39, the CD40 ligand, on normal and cloned CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 151:2497.[Abstract]
  27. Banchereau, J., F. Bazan, D. Blanchard, F. Briere, J. P. Galizzi, C. van Kooten, Y. J. Liu, F. Rousset, S. Saeland. 1994. The CD40 antigen and its ligand. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:881.[Medline]
  28. Campos-Neto, A., P. Ovendale, T. Bement, T. Koppi, W. Fanslow, M. Rossi, M. Alderson. 1998. CD40 ligand is not essential for the development of cell-mediated immunity and resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 160:2037.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Paul, W., R. Seder. 1994. Lymphocyte responses and cytokines. Cell 76:241.[Medline]
  30. Grabstein, K. H., J. Eisenman, K. Shanebeck, C. Rauch, S. Srinivasan, V. Fung, C. Beers, J. Richardson, M. A. Schoenborn, M. Ahdieh, et al 1994. Cloning of a T cell growth factor that interacts with the ß chain of the interleukin-2 receptor. Science 264:965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Leclercq, G., V. Debacker, M. de Smedt, J. Plum. 1996. Differential effects of interleukin-15 and interleukin-2 on differentiation of bipotential T/natural killer progenitor cells. J. Exp. Med. 184:325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Wilkinson, P. C., F. Y. Liew. 1995. Chemoattraction of human blood T lymphocytes by interleukin-15. J. Exp. Med. 181:1255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Vella, A., S. Dow, T. Potter, J. Kappler, P. Marrack. 1998. Cytokine-induced survival of activated T cells in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Zhang, X., S. Sun, I. Hwang, D. F. Tough, J. Sprent. 1998. Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. Immunity 8:591.[Medline]
  35. Grewal, I. S., R. A. Flavell. 1998. CD40 and CD154 in cell-mediated immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:111.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
J.-B. O. Barbaroux, M. Beleut, C. Brisken, C. G. Mueller, and R. W. Groves
Epidermal Receptor Activator of NF-{kappa}B Ligand Controls Langerhans Cells Numbers and Proliferation
J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 1103 - 1108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
M. Sun and P. J. Fink
A New Class of Reverse Signaling Costimulators Belongs to the TNF Family
J. Immunol., October 1, 2007; 179(7): 4307 - 4312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
M.-Y. Kim, F. M. McConnell, F. M. C. Gaspal, A. White, S. H. Glanville, V. Bekiaris, L. S. K. Walker, J. Caamano, E. Jenkinson, G. Anderson, et al.
Function of CD4+CD3- cells in relation to B- and T-zone stroma in spleen
Blood, February 15, 2007; 109(4): 1602 - 1610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
A. Rivollier, L. Perrin-Cocon, S. Luche, H. Diemer, J.-M. Strub, D. Hanau, A. van Dorsselaer, V. Lotteau, C. Rabourdin-Combe, T. Rabilloud, et al.
High Expression of Antioxidant Proteins in Dendritic Cells: Possible Implications in Atherosclerosis
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2006; 5(4): 726 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M.A. Garcia-Perez, I. Noguera, C. Hermenegildo, A. Martinez-Romero, J.J. Tarin, and A. Cano
Alterations in the phenotype and function of immune cells in ovariectomy-induced osteopenic mice
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 880 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Dent. Res.Home page
Y.-T.A. Teng
Protective and Destructive Immunity in the Periodontium: Part 2--T-cell-mediated Immunity in the Periodontium.
J. Dent. Res., March 1, 2006; 85(3): 209 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Infect. Immun.Home page
Y. Miyahira, Y. Takashima, S. Kobayashi, Y. Matsumoto, T. Takeuchi, M. Ohyanagi-Hara, A. Yoshida, A. Ohwada, H. Akiba, H. Yagita, et al.
Immune Responses against a Single CD8+-T-Cell Epitope Induced by Virus Vector Vaccination Can Successfully Control Trypanosoma cruzi Infection
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2005; 73(11): 7356 - 7365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Infect. Immun.Home page
Y.-T. A. Teng, D. Mahamed, and B. Singh
Gamma Interferon Positively Modulates Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans-Specific RANKL+ CD4+ Th-Cell-Mediated Alveolar Bone Destruction In Vivo
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2005; 73(6): 3453 - 3461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Rheum DisHome page
S-M Dai, K Nishioka, and K Yudoh
Interleukin (IL) 18 stimulates osteoclast formation through synovial T cells in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with IL1{beta} and tumour necrosis factor {alpha}
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2004; 63(11): 1379 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. Vidal, P. Serrant, B. Schlosser, P. van den Broek, F. Lorget, and A. Donnet-Hughes
Osteoprotegerin production by human intestinal epithelial cells: a potential regulator of mucosal immune responses
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): G836 - G844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
T. M. Doherty, L. A. Fitzpatrick, D. Inoue, J.-H. Qiao, M. C. Fishbein, R. C. Detrano, P. K. Shah, and T. B. Rajavashisth
Molecular, Endocrine, and Genetic Mechanisms of Arterial Calcification
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(4): 629 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Seshasayee, H. Wang, W. P. Lee, P. Gribling, J. Ross, N. Van Bruggen, R. Carano, and I. S. Grewal
A Novel in Vivo Role for Osteoprotegerin Ligand in Activation of Monocyte Effector Function and Inflammatory Response
J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30202 - 30209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
T. Yoneda, N. Ishimaru, R. Arakaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Izawa, K. Moriyama, and Y. Hayashi
Estrogen Deficiency Accelerates Murine Autoimmune Arthritis Associated with Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand-Mediated Osteoclastogenesis
Endocrinology, May 1, 2004; 145(5): 2384 - 2391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. C. Bharti, Y. Takada, S. Shishodia, and B. B. Aggarwal
Evidence That Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor (NF)-{kappa}B Ligand Can Suppress Cell Proliferation and Induce Apoptosis through Activation of a NF-{kappa}B-independent and TRAF6-dependent Mechanism
J. Biol. Chem., February 13, 2004; 279(7): 6065 - 6076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
C. Guillonneau, C. Louvet, K. Renaudin, J.-M. Heslan, M. Heslan, L. Tesson, C. Vignes, C. Guillot, Y. Choi, L. A. Turka, et al.
The Role of TNF-Related Activation-Induced Cytokine-Receptor Activating NF-{kappa}B Interaction in Acute Allograft Rejection and CD40L-Independent Chronic Allograft Rejection
J. Immunol., February 1, 2004; 172(3): 1619 - 1629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. O'Gradaigh and J. E. Compston
T-cell involvement in osteoclast biology: implications for rheumatoid bone erosion
Rheumatology, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 122 - 130.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Miyahira, H. Akiba, M. Katae, K. Kubota, S. Kobayashi, T. Takeuchi, A. Garcia-Sastre, Y. Fukuchi, K. Okumura, H. Yagita, et al.
Cutting Edge: A Potent Adjuvant Effect of Ligand to Receptor Activator of NF-{kappa}B Gene for Inducing Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Cell Response by DNA and Viral Vector Vaccination
J. Immunol., December 15, 2003; 171(12): 6344 - 6348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
U. M. Padigel, N. Kim, Y. Choi, and J. P. Farrell
TRANCE-RANK Costimulation is Required for IL-12 Production and the Initiation of a Th1-Type Response to Leishmania major Infection in CD40L-Deficient Mice
J. Immunol., November 15, 2003; 171(10): 5437 - 5441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
C. Wiethe, K. Dittmar, T. Doan, W. Lindenmaier, and R. Tindle
Enhanced Effector and Memory CTL Responses Generated by Incorporation of Receptor Activator of NF-{kappa}B (RANK)/RANK Ligand Costimulatory Molecules into Dendritic Cell Immunogens Expressing a Human Tumor-Specific Antigen
J. Immunol., October 15, 2003; 171(8): 4121 - 4130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]