|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


,
*
Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and Departments of Medicine and Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109;
The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As a result of such obstacles, efforts to isolate tumor-reactive T cell clones from the peripheral blood have seldom been successful despite multiple rounds of in vitro stimulation to enrich for rare Ag-specific T cells recognizing a normal self protein, followed by cloning and expansion of potentially hundreds of T cells from this bulk culture in the hope of subsequently identifying a tumor-reactive T cell clone. Such extensive tissue culture may be impractical for the development of a treatment modality, since it is extremely labor intensive and requires more time than may be available for patients with potentially progressive tumors. Therefore, a critical requirement in the expeditious generation of high avidity tumor-reactive CTL clones is the ability to rapidly identify such clones from the heterogeneous population of T cells in vitro.
Recently, peptide-MHC tetramers have been developed for use as fluorescent-conjugated reagents to enumerate the population of peptide-specific T cells in the peripheral blood 10, 11 . The use of tetramers provides an advantage over currently available methods, since the assay is more rapid and permits an assessment of the total number of peptide-specific T cells in the peripheral blood without the need for in vitro manipulation. It is also more sensitive as data indicate that limiting dilution assays underestimate the number of Ag-specific CTL by 20- to 50-fold 12, 13 . Peptide-MHC tetramers have been widely used to quantitate the accumulation of virus and bacteria-specific T cells in animal infection models 14, 15, 16, 17 . While peptide-MHC tetramers have been useful in monitoring the frequencies of reactive T cells, their use in prospectively identifying and selecting high avidity CTL from a heterogeneous population remains to be explored. In contrast to viral-induced immunity, the immune response to tumor cells is often less vigorous and results in CTL of lower avidity, especially when tumor Ags are represented by normal self proteins 18, 19 . Therefore, we determined whether tetramers could be used to identify tumor-specific CTL clones from heterogeneous populations and to isolate high avidity CTL clones from T cell cultures derived from patients with melanoma for potential expansion and use in adoptive therapy.
To evaluate the strategy of using peptide-MHC tetramers, T cell clones were generated against two tumor Ags expressed in 80100% of human melanomas, MART-1 (or MelanA) and gp100 20, 21, 22 . Since these tumor Ags are nonmutated self proteins found in normal pigmented tissues, potentially autoreactive T cells recognizing MART-1 and gp100 exist only in low numbers in vivo and therefore represent ideal model Ag for evaluating this approach. Peptide sequences corresponding to HLA-A2-restricted immunogenic epitopes of these two proteins have been identified and used to generate MART-1 and gp100 peptide-specific T cells 23, 24, 25 . However, the majority of such peptide-reactive T cells are not tumor reactive 1 . Our results demonstrate that the avidity of T cells for its tumor target can be predicted by the affinity of its TCR for the peptide-MHC complex, that the affinity phenotype of a given T cell can be described using peptide-MHC tetramers, and that this phenomenon can be exploited using peptide tetramers to facilitate the rapid isolation of high avidity tumor-reactive T cell clones.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 221-A2 cell line is an HLA-A, -B, and -C null mutant human B lymphoblastoid cell line transfected with the HLA-A2.1 gene 26 (gift from Dr. D. Gerahty, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA). The tumor cell lines A375 and 624 mel have been previously described 27 (gift of Y. Kawakami, Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). Both lines express HLA-A2, but only 624 mel also expresses gp100. SK29.1 is a tumor cell clone that expresses HLA-A2 and Melan-A/MART-1 (gift from P. Coulie, Ludwig Institute, Brussels, Belgium) 23 . The following FITC-conjugated Abs were used: LFA-1 (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA), CD28 (Becton Dickinson), and CD2 (Becton Dickinson), CD8 (Caltag, Burlingame, CA).
Generation of peptide-specific T cell clones
All studies using human subjects received prior approval by the institutional review board at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Following informed consent, PBMC were obtained from donors by leukapheresis. The donors were typed by the HLA Typing Lab at the Puget Sound Blood Center (Seattle, WA).
CTL lines from HLA-A2+ donors were generated in a manner similar to that previously described 2 . The PBMC were washed twice in sterile PBS; suspended in CTL medium consisting of RPMI, 25 mM HEPES, 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), and 10% human serum; and then placed in sterile tissue culture dishes for separation into adherent and nonadherent populations by culture for 2 h at 37°C. The adherent cells were treated with huGM-CSF (Immunex, Seattle, WA) and IL-4 (Endogen, Woburn, MA) for 57 days. The PBMC-derived DC were then harvested and pulsed with 40 µg/ml of either the G154 peptide corresponding to an A2-restricted immunogenic sequence of gp100, KTWGQYWQV or the M27 peptide corresponding to an A2-restricted immunogenic sequence of MART-1/MelanA, AAGIGILTV (Multiple Peptide Systems, San Diego, CA) for 4 h at a cell concentration of 2 x 106/ml in PBS with 1% human serum albumin (Life Technologies). The DC were irradiated and plated into 48-well plates at 2.5 x 104 cells/well. PBL as a source of responder T cells were depleted of CD4+ T cells using immunomagnetic beads (Dynabeads, Dynal, Oslo, Norway) and added at a responder to stimulator ratio of 20:1. IL-7 (10 ng/ml; Endogen) and IL-10 (10 ng/ml; Endogen) were added after the first stimulation only. Subsequent stimulations, 1 wk apart, were conducted using irradiated autologous monocytes pulsed with 20 µg/ml of peptide in 48-well plates at 2.5 x 104 cells/well. IL-2 was added 2 days after each stimulation at 50 U/ml (Chiron, Emeryville, CA). A total of three stimulation cycles were conducted before cloning.
Cloning and expansion of Ag-specific CTL
The cloning and expansion procedures were identical with that previously described 28 . T cells were plated at limiting dilution in 96-well round-bottomed plates in the presence of irradiated feeder cells (PBL and LCL) at a responder to stimulator ratio of 1:50,000 together with anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3, Ortho Tech, Raritan, NJ) and 50 U IL-2/ml (Chiron) in 0.2 ml of CTL medium.
Wells positive for clonal growth were identified 1014 days after plating and screened in a microcytotoxicity assay to identify those clones with cytolytic activity for peptide-pulsed target cells. Briefly, 100 µl from each well demonstrating clonal growth was tested against 2000 chromium-labeled unpulsed 221-A2 cells and 221-A2 cells pulsed with the relevant immunogenic peptide. Peptide-specific clones were transferred to 25-cm2 flasks, restimulated with anti-CD3 mAb, and irradiated allogeneic PBL and LCL were added as feeder cells. The cultures were fed with IL-2 at 50 U/ml 4896 h after restimulation. T cell clones were restimulated every 14 days. Following expansion, all clones were retested for peptide and tumor Ag-specific cytolytic activity, and cell surface phenotype (CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD16).
Construction of peptide-MHC tetramers
Tetramers were made as described by Lee et al. (manuscript in preparation) according to the protocol of Altman et al. 10 . HLA-A2/peptide tetramers were produced as previously described 10 , except that folded material was subjected to enzymatic biotinylation before chromatographic purification. Briefly, human ß2m and the soluble domain of the HLA-A2 heavy chain (residues 1276) linked at its carboxyl terminus to a BirA substrate peptide 29 were expressed separately in Escherichia coli and isolated as insoluble aggregate. The expressed HLA-A2-BirA substrate peptide and ß2m subunits were solubilized and refolded together in vitro in the presence of peptide. Folded material was then subjected to enzymatic biotinylation by BirA enzyme. HLA-A2/peptide complexes were purified first on a Superdex 200 (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) gel filtration column and subsequently on a Mono Q (Pharmacia) ion exchange column. Tetrameric complexes of biotinylated HLA-A2/peptide were produced by mixing purified, biotinylated heterodimer with NeutrAvidin-phycoerythrin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at a molar ratio of 4:1.
Staining and sorting of T cells using peptide-MHC tetramers
For each experiment the following control samples were used: unstained cells, control cells stained with tetramer-PE, control cells stained with anti-CD8-FITC, and control cells stained with anti-CD19-Cy5 (for compensation). Cells were also stained with anti-CD8-FITC, anti-CD19-Cy5, and avidin-PE to analyze background staining. Sample analysis was performed using 12 x 106 cells in 30 µl of 1% FCS/PBS. Anti-CD8-FITC (1/60), anti-CD19-Cy5 (1/90), and relevant tetramer-PE (final concentration of 20 µg MHC/ml) were added, and the staining was conducted for 4 h at 4 C. In samples not used for sterile sorting, 0.1% sodium azide was used, and staining was conducted for only 2 h. The cells were then analyzed on a Vantage Cell Corter (BDIS, Mountain View, CA) or a FACScan (BDIS) using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson). Sorted cells were cloned and expanded using anti-CD3, IL-2, and irradiated feeder cells as described above.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Peptides corresponding to the HLA-A2-restricted immunogenic
epitopes of gp100 (G154: KTWGQYWQV) and MART-1 (M27:AAGIGILTV) were
used to generate CTL clones from eight HLA-A2+ donors
according to the protocol described above. Studies from two
representative donors, UPN 7021 and UPN 6163, are described. Of
approximately 400 clones screened against peptide-pulsed and unpulsed
HLA-A2-matched targets in a microcytotoxicity chromium release assay,
four to eight peptide-specific CTL clones were subsequently isolated
that proved to be tumor reactive. The low percentage of tumor-reactive
CTL clones (12%) found among the peptide-specific CTL isolated from
patients 7021 and 6163 is representative of that observed in the six
other HLA-A2+ donors (data not shown). Clones considered to
be peptide specific following screening in microcytotoxicity assays
were expanded and tested for their ability to lyse the following
targets: unpulsed 221-A2; peptide-pulsed 221-A2; Ag-positive,
HLA-A2-positive tumor cells (624 mel or SK29.1); and Ag-negative,
HLA-A2-positive tumor cells (A375). Representative gp100- and
MART-1-specific clones from each patient are shown (Fig. 1
). CTL demonstrating specific lysis of
peptide-pulsed targets and not Ag-positive tumors (G154-specific clones
5, 7, 13, and 15 (Fig. 1
A) and M27-specific clones 1, 4, 6,
15 (Fig. 1
C)) have been defined as peptide-specific, whereas
the clones demonstrating specific lysis of peptide-pulsed targets as
well as Ag-positive tumors (G154-specific clones 4 and 12 (Fig. 1
A) and M27-specific clones 3, 5, and 8 (Fig. 1
C)) have been defined as tumor-reactive. To further
characterize the avidity of these CTL clones for their target Ag, we
tested for lysis of HLA-A2+ targets pulsed with decreasing
concentrations of peptide ranging from 107 to
102 pg/ml (Fig. 1
, B and D). Two
patterns of lysis were observed. T cell clones that lysed tumor targets
(tumor-reactive CTL; e.g., G154-specific clone 4 (Fig. 1
A)
or clone 3 (Fig. 1
C)) demonstrated specific lysis of A221-A2
cells pulsed with as little as 103 pg/ml of peptide, while
peptide-specific nontumor-reactive T cell clones (e.g., clone 7 (Fig. 1
A) or clone 4 (Fig. 1
C)) only lysed targets
pulsed with >105 pg/ml of peptide. Thus, higher
concentrations of peptide could compensate for poor T cell tumor
killing by increasing the avidity of the interaction. We wanted to
determine whether the observed differential avidity of the T cells for
the target cell reflected an inherent property of the TCR or was due to
other factors such as the level of expression of accessory molecules or
the TCR. Abs to CD8, LFA, and CD28 were used to stain representative
peptide-specific and tumor-reactive CTL clones from patients 7021 and
6163. There was no detectable difference in the level of expression of
accessory molecules among the different T cell clones. There was also
no detectable difference in the level of TCR expression when staining
was examined by flow cytometry using a pan-anti-TCR Ab (data not
shown).
|
Peptide-MHC tetramers can be used to identify and recover peptide-specific CTL clones in vitro
Peptides G154 and M27 were used in the construction of the
peptide-MHC tetramers. The ability of these tetramers to specifically
stain CTL through its cognate TCR was assessed by staining relevant and
irrelevant peptide-specific CTL clones. The G154 tetramer, presenting
the G154 peptide in the context of HLA-A2, specifically stained
G154-specific CTL and not M27-specific CTL (Fig. 2
A). Conversely, the M27
tetramer, presenting M27 peptide in the context of HLA-A2, specifically
stained M27-specific CTL and not G154-specific CTL (Fig. 2
B). To determine whether the tetramers can be used to
recover peptide-specific CTL from a heterogeneous culture of bulk
stimulated CTL, G154- and M27-specific tumor-reactive CTL clones (6163
Clone 4 and 7021 clone 5, respectively) were added to autologous PBMCs
at frequencies of 1.0, 0.5, and 0.1% of the total PBMC population. The
prevalence of peptide-specific T cells in an in vitro stimulated bulk
culture after three cycles of in vitro stimulation ranged from 0.52%
of the population. Using the specific peptide-MHC tetramers, the
introduced CTL could be identified by flow cytometry and recovered
following FACS sorting. To determine whether the recovered
tetramer-staining CTL clones retained their functional phenotype
following sterile sorting, the tetramer-positive population was
expanded for further testing using anti-CD3 mAb, irradiated feeder
cells, and IL-2. Similar to unmanipulated clone 4 and clone 5, the G154
and M27-specific CTL clones that were recovered specifically lysed
peptide-pulsed 221-A2 cells and Ag-positive HLA-A2+ tumor
cells (SK29.1 or 526 mel) but not unpulsed 221-A2 cells or Ag-negative
HLA-A2+ tumor cells (A375) in a chromium release assay,
demonstrating retention of their lytic phenotype following tetramer
staining and recovery by cell sorting (data not shown).
|
To determine whether peptide-MHC tetramers could discriminate high
avidity tumor-reactive from low avidity peptide-specific CTL, we
compared under identical staining conditions the tetramer staining of
low avidity, peptide-specific CTL clones with that of high avidity,
tumor-specific CTL clones isolated from the same patient. 6163 clone 5,
a G154 peptide-specific CTL clone, and 6163 clone 4, a tumor-reactive
CTL clone, were stained with PE-conjugated peptide-MHC tetramers and
FITC-conjugated anti-CD8 Ab (Fig. 3
A). The mean fluorescence
intensity of tetramer staining was approximately 0.51 log higher in
the population of high avidity, tumor-reactive CTL (clone 4) compared
with that of the low avidity, peptide-specific CTL (clone 5; Fig. 3
B). Staining of high and low avidity M27-specific CTL
clones from patient 6163 and of both gp100 and M27-specific CTL clones
from another HLA-A2+ patient, 7021, consistently
demonstrated a higher mean fluorescent signal with the high avidity,
tumor-reactive CTL clones than with their lower avidity
peptide-specific clones (data not shown).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The very high frequency of CTL clones isolated from bulk cultures using this method should enable the routine isolation of tumor-reactive effectors for adoptive therapy after only two or three cycles of in vitro stimulation, thereby decreasing the time to CTL generation by 50% and the required resources involved in cloning and screening hundreds of clones by severalfold.
Alternative approaches that have been explored to manipulate culture conditions to favor the generation of high avidity CTL include the use of suboptimal concentrations of peptide for in vitro stimulation 8 . Under such conditions, it is believed that only high avidity CTL will be restimulated by the low Ag density present and will persist in culture. As in our findings, these authors also demonstrated that T cell avidity did not correlate with the levels of expression of accessory molecules on the T cell but was possibly related to TCR affinity for its peptide MHC ligand 8 . However, in their experimental model, effector cells were isolated from splenocytes of mice immunized with recombinant viral Ag from which a very high precursor frequency of effector CTL could be expected. It is not known whether such an approach would be equally effective in the isolation of tumor-reactive CTL from the peripheral blood of patients with malignancies.
Other strategies include the use of specific Abs to the TCR V
or
Vß regions expressed by T cell clones known to be tumor reactive 31, 32 . In one study the majority of MelanA/MART-1-specific CTL clones
isolated from patients with melanoma was found to express a very
limited Vß repertoire, suggesting the possibility of using
anti-TCR Abs to select or preferentially expand these T cells 33 .
However, our unpublished data and the results of other studies 34
demonstrate that even when the identical immunogenic peptide was used,
the CTL clones generated from individual patients were biased toward
the expression of different TCR Vß genes. Therefore, a priori
knowledge of the TCR Vß or V
phenotype of useful tumor-reactive
clones for each patient treated would be required. In addition, Abs to
all the Vß or V
genes do not exist, thus excluding this approach
for patients for whom the TCR Vß or V
of tumor-reactive clones
cannot be identified, thereby limiting the broad application of this
approach.
An additional advantage with the use of peptide-MHC tetramers is that the construction of novel tetramer reagents can be easily generated to stain T cells of other specificities. Once peptides corresponding to immunogenic epitopes of target Ags have been identified, only a relatively small quantity of purified peptide (10 mg) is required for the assembly of novel tetramers. The mechanism responsible for increased intensity of TCR staining with the peptide-MHC tetramer when comparing high vs low avidity clones bears further examination. It does not appear to be related to the level of CD8 or accessory molecule expression, although systematic Ab blocking experiments would need to be conducted to more fully evaluate this possibility. Additionally, this difference in staining intensity does not appear to be related to the density of TCR expression, since flow cytometric analysis using anti-pan TCR Ab revealed no difference in staining between high vs low avidity T cells. The variation in staining intensity may reflect the following possibilities: 1) a difference in TCR density exists that is not detectable by anti-TCR Abs but is detectable by peptide-MHC tetramers, or 2) the dissociation rate for TCR-peptide/MHC interaction may be sufficiently rapid for low affinity clones so that a lower proportion of tetramer-bound TCRs at a given time will result in lower fluorescent intensity. A more rigorous examination of TCR affinity through the use, for example, of standard receptor-ligand binding assays would be required to confirm this hypothesis.
Nevertheless, peptide MHC tetramers staining a heterogeneous population of T cells does allow for visualization in real-time of T cells of defined specificity and, as demonstrated in this study, their avidity phenotype. This can be used to evaluate the result of manipulating culture conditions to enhance the outgrowth of high affinity, tumor-specific populations under the influence, for example, of immunomodulatory cytokines such as IL-7 or IL-10 2, 35 . However, the application of this approach becomes especially advantageous compared with currently available methods when examining in vivo phenomenon. For example, a limiting dilution analysis (LDA), which consumes more cells and requires more time than a flow cytometric analysis using peptide-MHC tetramers, differs from direct detection assays because it requires cell division before measurable killing can be detected. As a result, LDAs provide an estimation of only clonable CTL and not the larger population of effector CTLs that are present in vivo that can be readily detected by tetramer staining 13 . Additionally, LDAs cannot provide an accurate representation of the actual in vivo proportion of high vs low avidity CTL, since subtle differences in restimulation conditions can alter LDA results. Enzyme-linked immunospot assays and PCR-based tracking of specific TCRs are a more direct estimate of in vivo CTL frequency than LDAs. Although more sensitive than tetramer analysis, these assays cannot provide information regarding the avidity phenotype of individual CTL 36, 37, 38 . With peptide-MHC tetramers, T cells can be directly stained and analyzed with respect to their specificity and avidity phenotype without further in vitro manipulation. In addition, tetramer-bound T cells can be recovered for further in vitro culture and analysis. Insights into how the T cell repertoire develops and autoimmunity is prevented may be acquired without the use of transgenic animals, since tetramers can readily assess differences in the affinities of specific TCRs for MHC ligands that positively select or delete developing thymocytes while, in the periphery, activate or delete the mature T cell 39, 40, 41 . Furthermore, in evaluating vaccination strategies, peptide-MHC tetramers can be used to expeditiously assess not only the number but also the avidity phenotype of potentially tumor-reactive T cells induced by various Ags or Ag delivery systems, and immunization strategies can be tailored to obtain optimal results 42 . More significantly, clinical studies using immunogenic peptides corresponding to tumor epitopes in melanoma have demonstrated the expansion of peptide-specific CTL in vivo without tumor response 4, 5, 43, 44, 45 . The use of LDA or an analysis of peptide-specific clones following in vitro cultivation fails to accurately estimate the in vivo population of tumor-reactive CTL because restimulation selects for the outgrowth and loss of specific T cell populations. Peptide-MHC tetramers, by virtue of the differential staining intensity of high vs low avidity CTL, can provide an estimation of these populations. Since peptide tetramers do not trigger the T cells at 4°C, clones can be isolated and subjected to further in vitro analysis. In this way, clinical trials of immunotherapy can be guided by the rapid assessment of the avidity phenotype of peptide-specific populations of CTL. Furthermore, direct isolation and expansion of T cell clones from these patients using peptide-MHC tetramers can provide a rapid means of generating tumor-reactive T cell clones for adoptive therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Cassian Yee, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, D3100, 1100 Fairview Ave. N, Seattle, WA 98109. E-mail address: ![]()
Received for publication August 25, 1998. Accepted for publication November 2, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-ELISPOT assay. Int. J. Cancer 71:932.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Turner, E. R. Jellison, E. G. Lingenheld, L. Puddington, and L. Lefrancois Avidity maturation of memory CD8 T cells is limited by self-antigen expression J. Exp. Med., August 4, 2008; 205(8): 1859 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. P. Andrews, C. D. Pack, and A. E. Lukacher Generation of Antiviral Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I-Restricted T Cells in the Absence of CD8 Coreceptors J. Virol., May 15, 2008; 82(10): 4697 - 4705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Kroger, S. Amoah, and M. A. Alexander-Miller Cutting Edge: Dendritic Cells Prime a High Avidity CTL Response Independent of the Level of Presented Antigen J. Immunol., May 1, 2008; 180(9): 5784 - 5788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Belyakov, S. Kozlowski, M. Mage, J. D. Ahlers, L. F. Boyd, D. H. Margulies, and J. A. Berzofsky Role of {alpha}3 domain of class I MHC molecules in the activation of high- and low-avidity CD8+ CTLs Int. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 19(12): 1413 - 1420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yang, E. M. Wall, K. Milne, P. Theiss, P. Watson, and B. H. Nelson CD8+ T Cells Induce Complete Regression of Advanced Ovarian Cancers by an Interleukin (IL)-2/IL-15 Dependent Mechanism Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 13(23): 7172 - 7180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Laugel, H. A. van den Berg, E. Gostick, D. K. Cole, L. Wooldridge, J. Boulter, A. Milicic, D. A. Price, and A. K. Sewell Different T Cell Receptor Affinity Thresholds and CD8 Coreceptor Dependence Govern Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Activation and Tetramer Binding Properties J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 23799 - 23810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Marrack Conference Summary Proceedings of the ATS, August 15, 2007; 4(5): 469 - 471. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Kroger and M. A. Alexander-Miller Cutting Edge: CD8+ T Cell Clones Possess the Potential to Differentiate into both High- and Low-Avidity Effector Cells J. Immunol., July 15, 2007; 179(2): 748 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Cush, K. M. Anderson, D. H. Ravneberg, J. L. Weslow-Schmidt, and E. Flano Memory Generation and Maintenance of CD8+ T Cell Function during Viral Persistence J. Immunol., July 1, 2007; 179(1): 141 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ranasinghe, S. J. Turner, C. McArthur, D. B. Sutherland, J.-H. Kim, P. C. Doherty, and I. A. Ramshaw Mucosal HIV-1 Pox Virus Prime-Boost Immunization Induces High-Avidity CD8+ T Cells with Regime-Dependent Cytokine/Granzyme B Profiles J. Immunol., February 15, 2007; 178(4): 2370 - 2379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Lyons, T. Moore, N. Brasic, M. Li, J. J. Roszkowski, and M. I. Nishimura Influence of Human CD8 on Antigen Recognition by T-Cell Receptor-Transduced Cells Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 66(23): 11455 - 11461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Archbold, W. A. Macdonald, J. J. Miles, R. M. Brennan, L. Kjer-Nielsen, J. McCluskey, S. R. Burrows, and J. Rossjohn Alloreactivity between Disparate Cognate and Allogeneic pMHC-I Complexes Is the Result of Highly Focused, Peptide-dependent Structural Mimicry J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2006; 281(45): 34324 - 34332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. E. Brown, C. Blank, J. Kline, A. K. Kacha, and T. F. Gajewski Homeostatic Proliferation as an Isolated Variable Reverses CD8+ T Cell Anergy and Promotes Tumor Rejection J. Immunol., October 1, 2006; 177(7): 4521 - 4529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Guillaume, P. Baumgaertner, G. S. Angelov, D. Speiser, and I. F. Luescher Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting and Cloning of Bona Fide CD8+ CTL with Reversible MHC-Peptide and Antibody Fab' Conjugates J. Immunol., September 15, 2006; 177(6): 3903 - 3912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|