|
|
||||||||
CUTTING EDGE |


Departments of
*
Microbiology/Immunology and
Pathology/Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536; and
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IFN-
, and IL-1 in HT-29 human colon carcinoma cells. We
previously reported that IFN-
and TNF-
induce production of the
transcription factor IFN regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) in HT-29 cells and
that IRF-1 binds to an element in exon 1 of the PIGR
gene. We now report that levels of IRF-1 and pIgR mRNA are coordinately
regulated in HT-29 cells by TNF-
, IFN-
, and IL-1ß. Furthermore,
we demonstrate that in vivo expression of pIgR mRNA is greatly
depressed in the intestine and liver of IRF-1-deficient mice. Our
findings indicate a major role for the IRF-1 transcription factor in
regulation of the PIGR gene and suggest a model for
regulation of important genes in the mucosal immune system by
proinflammatory cytokines. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The HT-29 human colon carcinoma cell line has widely been used to model
the regulation of pIgR expression by intestinal epithelial cells (Ref.
3, and references therein). Expression of pIgR by HT-29 cells is
up-regulated by the proinflammatory cytokines IFN-
(4, 5, 6, 7), TNF-
(7, 8, 9), and IL-1 (10), as well as the Th2-type cytokine IL-4 (5, 7, 9).
Studies in our laboratory of cytokines produced by in vitro-stimulated
human intestinal lamina propria mononuclear cells suggested that the
proinflammatory cytokine IFN-
was the central regulator of pIgR
expression by intestinal epithelial cells (7). It has recently been
reported that substantial proportions of human intraepithelial and
lamina propria gut lymphocytes spontaneously secrete IFN-
and/or
IL-4 (11).
At the molecular level, IFN-
has been shown to increase pIgR mRNA
levels by a mechanism dependent on de novo protein synthesis (6, 12).
We recently demonstrated that IFN-
and TNF-
cause de novo
synthesis of the transcription factor IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-1 in
HT-29 cells and that IRF-1 binds to a regulatory element in exon 1 of
the human PIGR gene (13, 14). IRF-1 mRNA is known to be
induced by proinflammatory cytokines, and this transcription factor has
widely been implicated in the regulation of immune responses (reviewed
in 15 . We now demonstrate that the levels of IRF-1 and pIgR mRNA
are coordinately regulated by proinflammatory cytokines in HT-29 cells.
We further show that pIgR mRNA levels are markedly reduced in tissues
of IRF-1-deficient mice, suggesting an important role for IRF-1 in pIgR
regulation in vivo.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The HT-29.74 subclone of the HT-29 human colon carcinoma cell
line was originally selected for its ability to differentiate to an
enterocytic phenotype in glucose-free medium (3). We isolated by
limiting dilution a new subclone of HT-29.74 cells, HT-29v20, selected
for high basal expression of pIgR and increased pIgR expression in the
presence of IFN-
, TNF-
, or IL-1ß. HT-29v20 cells were plated in
60-mm dishes, at a concentration of 1.5 x 106
cells/dish, and induced to differentiate as described (3) by switching
to glucose-free Leibovitzs L-15 medium (Life Technologies,
Gaithersburg, MD). Three days after switching to glucose-free medium,
duplicate cultures of HT-29v20 cells were treated for 12 h (for
analysis of IRF-1 mRNA) or 24 h (for analysis of pIgR mRNA) in the
presence of varying combinations of cytokines. The concentrations of
cytokines were 100 U/ml IFN-
, 10 ng/ml IL-1ß, and 10 ng/ml TNF-
(high dose) or 5 U/ml IFN-
, 0.5 ng/ml IL-1ß, and 0.5 ng/ml TNF-
(low dose) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).
Mice
Eight-wk-old male IRF-1-/- mice (16), backcrossed onto a B6 background, and wild-type age-matched male B6 mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free environment until tissues were harvested.
RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR for pIgR and IRF-1 mRNA
Total cellular RNA was extracted from HT-29v20 cells and mouse
tissues using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturers protocol
(Life Technologies). Levels of pIgR and IRF-1 mRNA from HT-29v20 cells
and mouse tissues were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Primer pairs
for pIgR, IRF-1, and ß-actin are shown in Table I
. Reactions were conducted using the
Access RT-PCR kit according to the manufacturers protocol (Promega,
Madison, WI). Reverse transcription was conducted at 48°C for 45 min,
followed by inactivation of the enzyme at 94°C for 4 min. PCR
conditions were optimized for each primer pair as follows. For human
pIgR, we used 25 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 1 min, and
68°C for 2 min; final extension was 68°C for 7 min. For human
IRF-1, it was 30 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s,
and 72°C for 1 min; final extension was 72°C for 10 min. For mouse
pIgR, we used 30 cycles at 94°C for 45 s, 61°C for 45 s,
and 72°C for 1.5 min; final extension was 72°C for 10 min. For
mouse IRF-1, we used 23 cycles at 94°C for 45 s, 61°C for
45 s, and 72°C for 1.5 min; final extension was 72°C for 10
min. ß-actin primers were included with the pIgR or IRF-1 primers as
an internal control. Amplified cDNA products were separated by
electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels, visualized with the fluorescent
dye SYBR Green 1 (FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, ME), and quantified by
laser densitometry using a STORM Phosphoimager (Molecular Dynamics,
Sunnyvale, CA). Each sample of HT-29v20 cells was analyzed using a
range of concentrations of total cellular RNA as template (Fig. 1
A). Regression lines were
calculated for plots of fluorescence intensity (y-axis) vs
input RNA (x-axis) (Fig. 1
B). Normalized mRNA
levels were calculated as the ratio of the y values for pIgR
or IRF-1 to ß-actin at the midpoints of the linear ranges of the
regression curves (r2
0.9). Data shown are
representative of two experiments. For mouse tissues, it was determined
that a template concentration of 200 ng total cellular RNA would yield
cDNA products for pIgR, IRF-1, and ß-actin that were within
the linear range of amplification. Amplified cDNA products
were separated by electrophoresis in 2% agarose, visualized with
ethidium bromide, and quantified using National Institute of Health
Image 1.6 software. Normalized mRNA levels were calculated by dividing
the fluorescence intensities of the cDNA products for pIgR or IRF-1 by
ß-actin.
|
|
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To examine whether the human IRF-1 and PIGR
genes are coordinately regulated by proinflammatory cytokines, we
developed sensitive and quantitative RT-PCR assays for their mRNA
products. A typical assay for pIgR mRNA in HT-29v20 human colon
carcinoma cells is shown in Fig. 1
. The responses of pIgR and IRF-1
mRNA to proinflammatory cytokines are shown in Fig. 2
A. In the first experiment
(high dose), HT29v20 cells were treated with IFN-
, TNF-
, and
IL-1ß, alone and in combination, at doses that were determined to be
optimal for up-regulation of pIgR by the individual cytokines (7, 10).
In the second experiment (low dose), HT-29v20 cells were treated with
the same combinations of cytokines at 1/20 of the doses used in the
first experiment. Because cytokine induction of the IRF-1
gene precedes induction of the PIGR gene (13), cells were
harvested at 12 h for analysis of IRF-1 mRNA and at 24 h for
analysis of pIgR mRNA. To facilitate comparisons among cytokines, the
treatment groups are arranged in order of increasing effects on pIgR
mRNA and are grouped separately for treatments that did or did not
include TNF-
.
|
and IL-1ß caused a threefold
increase in pIgR mRNA, and their effects were not additive. A different
trend was observed for IRF-1 mRNA, where IFN-
caused a much greater
increase (5.5-fold) than did IL-1ß (2.4-fold), and their effects
appeared to be additive (7.2-fold). Conversely, the high dose of
TNF-
caused a large increase in IRF-1 mRNA (7.2-fold) and only a
moderate increase in pIgR mRNA (2-fold). In addition, the high dose of
TNF-
inhibited the effects of IFN-
and IL-1ß on pIgR mRNA, but
not IRF-1 mRNA. Somewhat different trends were observed at low cytokine
concentrations. Treatment with low doses of IL-1ß or IFN-
alone
resulted in very modest increases in pIgR mRNA (1.5-fold and 2.1-fold,
respectively) and IRF-1 mRNA (1.3-fold and 1.9-fold, respectively),
while the combination of IL-1ß and IFN-
was additive for pIgR mRNA
(2.8-fold) and synergistic for IRF-1 mRNA (3.4-fold). Treatment with a
low dose of TNF-
alone had no effect on pIgR mRNA and only a modest
effect on IRF-1 mRNA (1.4-fold). However, TNF-
in combination with
IFN-
or IL-1ß caused relative decreases in pIgR mRNA and
synergistic increases in IRF-1 mRNA.
To determine whether the responses of IRF-1 and pIgR mRNA to
proinflammatory cytokines were correlated, we subjected the data in
Fig. 2
A to linear regression and correlation analyses. At
high doses of cytokines, there was no significant correlation between
IRF-1 and pIgR mRNA levels (data not shown). At low doses of cytokines,
however, IRF-1 and pIgR mRNA levels were clearly correlated (Fig. 2
B). The correlation was most apparent if treatment groups
that did not include TNF-
(no cytokines vs IFN-
and IL-1ß,
alone and in combination) were analyzed separately from treatment
groups that included TNF-
(alone and in combination with IFN-
and/or IL-1ß). While strong correlations were observed for both
groups (r2 = 0.947 without TNF-
,
r2 = 0.901 with TNF-
), the slope of the
regression line was threefold higher in the absence than in the
presence of TNF-
(slope = 0.74 vs 0.23).
Our data suggest a positive relationship between the regulation of the
IRF-1 and PIGR genes by proinflammatory
cytokines. High doses of IL-1ß may further increase pIgR mRNA, and
TNF-
at any dose may decrease pIgR mRNA, by additional mechanisms
that are independent of IRF-1. It should also be noted that the
regression lines in Fig. 2
B do not pass through the origin,
suggesting that basal expression of pIgR mRNA in intestinal epithelial
cells can occur in the absence of IRF-1. The conclusions of our in
vitro studies are supported by in vivo studies in mice.
Expression of pIgR mRNA is reduced in IRF-1-deficient mice
We previously identified a binding site for IRF-1 in exon 1 of the
human PIGR gene (13). Significantly, this IRF-1 site is
100% conserved in the human, rat, and mouse PIGR genes
(Fig. 3
A). We therefore
hypothesized that expression of pIgR mRNA in mouse tissues is
correlated with endogenous expression of IRF-1. To test this
hypothesis, we measured levels of pIgR and IRF-1 mRNA in intestine,
liver, and spleen of wild-type and IRF-1-deficient mice (Fig. 3
B). Levels of pIgR mRNA in intestine and liver of
IRF-1-deficient mice were reduced by 47% and 98%, respectively,
compared with wild-type mice. These results suggest that mouse
intestinal epithelial cells regulate pIgR expression by both
IRF-1-dependent and -independent mechanisms, consistent with our
findings in human intestinal epithelial cells (see above). In contrast,
pIgR expression in mouse liver appears to be almost entirely dependent
on IRF-1. No pIgR mRNA was detected in spleens of either wild-type or
IRF-1-deficient mice, confirming the tissue specificity of pIgR
expression. IRF-1 mRNA levels were approximately threefold higher in
intestines than livers of wild-type mice, perhaps reflecting
differences in endogenous cytokine levels between these tissues.
|
A model for the molecular mechanisms of signaling through IRF-1 is
presented in Fig. 4
. IFN-
, IL-1ß,
and TNF-
interact with their respective cell surface receptors to
transduce a variety of signals, including the Janus kinase
(JAK)/STAT (IFN-
) and NF-
B (IL-1ß and TNF-
) cascades. The
STAT1 and NF-
B transcription factors are then translocated to the
nucleus, where they enhance transcription of the IRF-1 promoter
(reviewed in 15 . Newly synthesized IRF-1 is translocated to the
nucleus and binds an element in exon 1 of the PIGR gene
(13), leading to increased PIGR transcription and higher
levels of pIgR mRNA. Low doses of cytokines caused synergistic
induction at IRF-1, perhaps mediated by cooperative binding of STAT1
and NF-
B to the IRF-1 promoter (17). Such a mechanism could allow
for optimal induction of pIgR expression by proinflammatory cytokines
at low concentrations that would minimize damage to the intestinal
epithelium. It should be noted that proinflammatory cytokines transduce
a variety of signals in addition to IRF-1, which in the case of IL-1ß
may stimulate pIgR expression and in the case of TNF-
may inhibit
pIgR expression. Furthermore, noninflammatory cytokines such as IL-4
may enhance pIgR expression (5, 7, 9), either through up-regulation of
IRF-1 or through IRF-1-independent pathways.
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Charlotte Kaetzel, Department of Pathology, MS117 Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: pIgR, polymeric IgR; IRF, IFN regulatory factor. ![]()
Received for publication September 24, 1998. Accepted for publication November 25, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
enhances expression of secretory component, the epithelial receptor for polymeric immunoglobulins. J. Immunol. 138:4303.[Abstract]
on the expression of polymeric Ig receptor (secretory component) and IgA binding by human epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 145:1740.[Abstract]
induces polymeric immunoglobulin receptor mRNA in human intestinal epithelial cells by a protein synthesis dependent mechanism. Mol. Immunol. 30:413.[Medline]
and
interferon. Scand. J. Immunol. 28:351.[Medline]
and interleukin 4 by human intraepithelial and lamina propria gut lymphocytes. Gut 42:643.
stimulation of messenger RNA for human secretory component (poly-Ig receptor) depends on continuous intermediate protein synthesis. Scand. J. Immunol. 37:251.[Medline]
. Mol. Immunol. 34:75.[Medline]
and IFN-
signalling pathways through synergistic induction of IRF-1/ISGF-2 is mediated by a composite GAS/
B promoter element. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4346.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. J. Davids, J. E. D. Palm, M. P. Housley, J. R. Smith, Y. S. Andersen, M. G. Martin, B. A. Hendrickson, F.-E. Johansen, S. G. Svard, F. D. Gillin, et al. Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor in Intestinal Immune Defense against the Lumen-Dwelling Protozoan Parasite Giardia J. Immunol., November 1, 2006; 177(9): 6281 - 6290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dongari-Bagtzoglou and P.L. Fidel Jr. The Host Cytokine Responses and Protective Immunity in Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 2005; 84(11): 966 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pal, C. S. Kaetzel, K. Brundage, C. A. Cunningham, and C. F. Cuff Regulation of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor expression by reovirus J. Gen. Virol., August 1, 2005; 86(8): 2347 - 2357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Schneeman, M. E. C. Bruno, H. Schjerven, F.-E. Johansen, L. Chady, and C. S. Kaetzel Regulation of the Polymeric Ig Receptor by Signaling through TLRs 3 and 4: Linking Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses J. Immunol., July 1, 2005; 175(1): 376 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. C. Bruno and C. S. Kaetzel Long-Term Exposure of the HT-29 Human Intestinal Epithelial Cell Line to TNF Causes Sustained Up-Regulation of the Polymeric Ig Receptor and Proinflammatory Genes through Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Mechanisms J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 7278 - 7284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Elm, R. Braathen, S. Bergmann, R. Frank, J.-P. Vaerman, C. S. Kaetzel, G. S. Chhatwal, F.-E. Johansen, and S. Hammerschmidt Ectodomains 3 and 4 of Human Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor (hpIgR) Mediate Invasion of Streptococcus pneumoniae into the Epithelium J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 6296 - 6304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Jenkins, J. Wang, M. Vazir, J. Vela, O. Sahagun, P. Gabbay, L. Hoang, R. L. Diaz, R. Aranda, and M. G. Martin Role of passive and adaptive immunity in influencing enterocyte-specific gene expression Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): G714 - G725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schjerven, P. Brandtzaeg, and F.-E. Johansen Hepatocyte NF-1 and STAT6 Cooperate with Additional DNA-Binding Factors to Activate Transcription of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor Gene in Response to IL-4 J. Immunol., June 15, 2003; 170(12): 6048 - 6056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ferkol, L. A. Cohn, T. E. Phillips, A. Smith, and P. B. Davis Targeted Delivery of Antiprotease to the Epithelial Surface of Human Tracheal Xenografts Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2003; 167(10): 1374 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Hempen, K. M. Phillips, P. S. Conway, K. H. Sandoval, T. A. Schneeman, H.-J. Wu, and C. S. Kaetzel Transcriptional Regulation of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor Gene: Analysis of Basal Promoter Elements J. Immunol., August 15, 2002; 169(4): 1912 - 1921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schjerven, P. Brandtzaeg, and F.-E. Johansen A Novel NF-{kappa}B/Rel Site in Intron 1 Cooperates with Proximal Promoter Elements to Mediate TNF-{alpha}-Induced Transcription of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor J. Immunol., December 1, 2001; 167(11): 6412 - 6420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pilette, Y. Ouadrhiri, V. Godding, J-P. Vaerman, and Y. Sibille Lung mucosal immunity: immunoglobulin-A revisited Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2001; 18(3): 571 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |