|
|
||||||||

*
Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and
Umeå Center for Molecular Pathogenesis, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Ly49A receptor is expressed on approximately 20% of the NK1.1+ cells in B6 mice (6). It recognizes H-2Dd and a class I molecule of the H-2k haplotype, presumably H-2Dk, as inhibitory ligands (6). We have previously shown that introduction of an H-2Dd transgene on a B6 background, as in D8 mice, confers the ability of NK cells to kill and reject cells that lack H-2Dd but are otherwise syngeneic (15). At least with respect to in vitro killing of Con A blast targets, this H-2Dd-mediated control of NK cell function was exerted mainly, if not entirely, through the Ly49A+ subset, which acquired the ability to kill H-2Dd-negative targets (16). The size of this subset was only marginally affected by introduction of the transgenic ligand (17), although the Ly49A receptor level on each NK cell was reduced 2- to 5-fold (16, 17). At the target cell level, transgenic expression of the H-2Dd resulted in protection from killing by NK cells of H-2Dd-expressing mice, as evaluated by the use of Con A blast targets and bone marrow grafts from the transgenic mice (18).
H-2Dd can thus define "self" as perceived by the NK cell system, with multiple functional effects as a consequence of in vivo expression of this inhibitory ligand of Ly49A. However, the "NK self phenotype" may not be defined in a unique manner by each single H-2 allele. In a recent study, we demonstrated that Con A-activated T cell blasts from mice transgenic for another H-2D allele, H-2Dp (B6DP mice), are also protected from NK cells of H-2Dd-expressing mice, e.g. BALB/C and D8 mice (19). Similarly, B6DP bone marrow grafts were strongly, although not totally, protected from rejection by NK cells of H-2Dd-transgenic D8 mice, while nontransgenic B6 marrow was efficiently rejected. The introduction of the H-2Dp transgene also conferred the capacity of the mice to reject nontransgenic B6 bone marrow. These experiments indicated that H-2Dd and H-2Dp MHC class I molecules control NK specificity in a similar manner. The most likely explanation was that H-2Dd and H-2Dp molecules are recognized by the same NK cell subset. This could occur either by coexpression of two different inhibitory receptors on the NK cell subset, or by a common motif on H-2Dd and H-2Dp recognized by the same inhibitory receptor. There is evidence from earlier studies of "F1 hybrid resistance" to bone marrow grafts that different H-2 haplotypes may contain gene products that "cross-react" with respect to NK cell recognition (20, 21).
The aim of this study was to analyze whether H-2Dd and H-2Dp inhibit the same NK cell subset and, if so, whether this involved the same inhibitory receptor on this subset. We demonstrate that tumor cells transfected with either H-2Dd or H-2Dp are protected from lysis by the Ly49A+ NK subset in B6 mice. Ab-blocking experiments indicated both that MHC class I molecules are recognized by the Ly49A receptor and that conjugation studies support that Ly49A and H-2Dp interact physically. In addition, analysis of the expression of inhibitory receptors (Ly49A, C/I, and G2) in B6DP mice showed that the NK cells expressed reduced levels of Ly49A and Ly49G2. However, the level of Ly49A was significantly higher in B6DP mice than in D8 mice, which may suggest that Ly49A binds H-2Dp with a lower affinity than H-2Dd, yet still sufficiently well to enable Ly49A receptor-mediated inhibition.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
C57BL/6 (B6)3 (H-2b), H-2Dd-transgenic B6 (D8), and H-2Dp-transgenic B6 (B6DP) mice were bred and maintained at the Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute.
Cell lines
RBL-5 and RMA lymphoma cell lines are of B6 origin. The H-2Dd and H-2Dp transfectants of RBL-5 were generated in our laboratory.
Abs and reagents
PE-conjugated anti-NK1.1 (PK136) mAb were purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Protein G (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden)-purified anti-Ly49A (A1) mAb were either conjugated with biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to standard protocols or purchased from PharMingen. FITC-conjugated anti-Ly49C/I (SW5E6) mAb were from PharMingen, and anti-Ly49G2 mAb were purified from the 4D11 hybridoma obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and conjugated to FITC (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) according to a standard protocol. FITC-conjugated streptavidin was purchased from Dakopatts (Glostrup, Denmark), and Red-670-conjugated streptavidin from Life Technologies (Täby, Sweden). The H-2Ld-specific Ab (30-5-7) was used as isotype-matched control Ab for the anti-Ly49A mAb. PE-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) was purchased from Caltag (San Diego, CA). F(ab')2 fragments of A1 mAbs were generated by pepsin digestion. Undigested mAbs and F(ab')2 fragments were separated on protein G columns. The purity of the preparation was analyzed with SDS-PAGE under reducing and nonreducing conditions.
Cytotoxicity assay
Nylon wool nonadherent spleen cells (2.53 x 106/ml) were cultured in complete media supplemented with 1000 U/ml rIL-2 as previously described (16). On day 3, the adherent cells were stained with biotinylated A1 mAb followed by Red 670-streptavidin and PE-NK1.1. Ly49A-positive and -negative cells were sorted on a FACS Vantage (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) and recultured for 12 days the dissociate the Abs used for sorting. Tumor cell targets were labeled with 51Cr as previously described (18). In the blocking experiments, the effector cells were preincubated with 150 µg/ml of anti-Ly49A F(ab')2 mAb. After incubating effector and target cells in 96-well plates for 4 h at 37°C, 100 µl of supernatant were harvested, and the radioactivity was measured in a gamma counter.
Conjugation assay
Con A blasts (prepared as described in 18) and Ly49A+ RMA cells, were washed in RPMI 1640 5% FCS, labeled at 37°C for 2030 min with 5 µM Cell Tracker Green CMFDA or Orange CMTMR diluted in RPMI 1640 5% FCS (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), washed 2 times, and resuspended in RPMI 1640 with 5% FCS. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 min to allow excess of fluorochrome to diffuse off the cells and then washed 1 time in RPMI 1640 with 5% FCS. The RMA cells were subsequently incubated with anti-Ly49A Ab, isotype-matched control Ab, or medium only at 4°C for 30 min. Cells of each type (2.5 x 105) (i.e., Con A blasts and RMA cells) were then mixed in triplicate in a total volume of 150 µl RPMI 1640 with 5% FCS in 96-well plates, centrifuged at 50 x g for 1 min, and incubated 15 min at 4°C. The mixed cells were carefully resuspended with a multichannel pipette in 350 µl PBS with 1% FCS, transferred to precipitin tubes, and analyzed by flow cytometry for conjugates. Percentages of conjugates were calculated according to the formula: 100 x {[number of FL1+/FL2+ cells]/[number of (FL1+/FL2+) + (FL1-/FL2+) + (FL1+/FL2-) + (FL1-/FL2-) cells]}.
Flow cytometry analysis
Erythrocyte-depleted spleen cells were passed through nylon wool (Polyscience, Eppelheim, Germany) columns. The columns were incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and the nonadherent cells were collected and stained with either biotinylated anti-Ly49A (A1) mAb, FITC-conjugated anti-Ly49G2 (4D11) mAb, or FITC-conjugated anti-Ly49C/I (SW5E6) mAb. Streptavidin RED-670 was used as a second step reagent for the anti-Ly49A mAb. All samples were stained with PE-conjugated NK1.1 mAb and subsequently analyzed on a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).
Statistics
Statistical analysis of the data was performed using a paired Student t test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In light of the observation that Ly49A+ NK cells are
inhibited by H-2Dd-expressing targets (6) and that
H-2Dd and H-2Dp acted similarly with respect to
protective capacity (19), we tested whether target cells expressing
H-2Dp also could inhibit Ly49A+ NK cells.
Ly49A+ and Ly49A- NK cells from B6 mice were
sorted by flow cytometry and used as effector cells against RBL-5
(H-2b) or RBL-5 tumor cells transfected with either
H-2Dp or H-2Dd class I molecules. The
Ly49A+ NK cells consistently showed a reduced lysis of
RBL-5Dp as well as RBL-5Dd tumor cells,
compared with the lysis of untransfected RBL-5 tumor cells (Table I
, Fig. 1
).
In occasional experiments (e.g. Fig. 1
), we observed somewhat less
efficient protection of Ly49A+ NK cell lysis by the
RBL-5Dp tumor cell targets as compared with
RBL-5Dd. However, there was no significant difference
between the two different transfectants when the data from all
experiments were analyzed (Table I
, data not shown). The
Ly49A- NK cells killed all the tumor targets to a similar
extent, although they appeared to kill RBL-5Dp targets
somewhat less well than RBL-5 and RBL-5Dd targets. There
was a significant difference for the RBL-5Dd as well as the
RBL-5Dp targets but not for untransfected RBL-5, when
comparing the lysis mediated by Ly49A+ and
Ly49A- NK cells (Table I
). We conclude that
Ly49A+ NK cells are inhibited by both H-2Dp-
and H-2Dd-transfected tumor cells.
|
|
By blocking the Ly49A receptor on the effector cells with
anti-Ly49A F(ab')2 Ab fragments, we were able to induce
efficient lysis of RBL-5Dp and RBL-5Dd tumor
cells (Fig. 2
). This demonstrates that
the inhibition by both MHC class I molecules was indeed mediated
through the Ly49A receptor. To investigate whether Ly49A receptor
physically interacts with H-2Dp, we used a cellular binding
assay. Fluorochrome-labeled Ly49A-expressing RMA cells and Con A blasts
from different mouse strains were mixed, and the numbers of conjugates
were analyzed by flow cytometry. To assess the role of the Ly49A
receptor, the test was performed in the presence or absence of
anti-Ly49A Abs. Ly49A-expressing RMA cells formed conjugates with
both D8 and B6DP Con A blasts (Fig. 3
and
Table II
). In both cases, the conjugate
formation was blocked by the addition of anti-Ly49A Abs, while
addition of isotype-matched control Abs did not alter the number of
conjugates. Some conjugate formation (
7%) was also observed between
B6 Con A blasts and Ly49A-expressing RMA cells. However, blocking with
anti-Ly49A Abs did not decrease the number of conjugates,
suggesting that this binding was not mediated through the Ly49A
receptor (Fig. 3
). It should be noted that the Ly49A-expressing RMA
cells repeatedly formed less conjugates with B6DP Con A blasts than
with D8 Con A blasts (Table II
). These experiments support that
H-2Dp and H-2Dd both physically and
functionally interact with the receptor Ly49A, suggesting that these
MHC molecules share a common inhibitory motif.
|
|
|
Having demonstrated that Ly49A can recognize also
H-2Dp MHC class I molecules and mediate inhibition of NK
cells, we analyzed whether H-2Dp expressed as a transgene
on a B6 background could influence the NK cell receptor repertoire in a
similar manner as the H-2Dd gene (16). We examined the
expression of Ly49A (with A1 mAb), Ly49C/I (SW5E6 mAb), and Ly49G2
(4D11 mAb) on NK1.1+ cells from B6, D8, and B6DP mice by
flow cytometry. As shown previously (16, 17), the expression of Ly49A
was reduced on NK1.1+ cells from D8 mice, as compared with
nontransgenic B6 NK cells (Table III
). NK
cells from B6DP mice also expressed significantly reduced levels of
Ly49A; interestingly, the Ly49A levels were "intermediate" compared
with the "high" and "low" Ly49A-expressing NK cells from B6 and
D8 mice, respectively (Table III
). The Ly49A expression on B6DP was
approximately 70% compared with B6 NK cells (= 100%). NK cells from
B6DP mice, as well as from D8 mice, were also found to express
significantly reduced levels of Ly49G2 compared with NK cells from B6
mice. There was no significant difference in the level of Ly49C/I
expression between the mice. As to the number of Ly49A+ NK
cells, these were similar in B6DP and B6 mice
(p > 0.05), while D8 mice had a somewhat
reduced number of Ly49A+ NK cells, as previously shown by
Salcedo et al. (17).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Interestingly, Ly49A-expressing RMA tumor cells consistently formed a
lower number of conjugates with B6DP Con A blasts than with D8 Con A
blasts (p < 0.05, Table II
). This observation
suggests that Ly49A has a slightly lower affinity for H-2Dp
than for H-2Dd. However, we cannot rule out the possibility
that the B6DP Con A blasts merely express a lower number of Ly49A
receptor ligands compared with D8 Con A blasts. To test this, a binding
assay with known concentrations of purified molecules must be used.
Notably, by using purified MHC class I molecules, Kane and colleagues
have demonstrated that Ly49A binds H-2Dk with lower
affinity than H-2Dd (22, 23). However, Ly49A+
NK cells from B6 mice are still inhibited by
H-2k-expressing cell lines (probably through
H-2Dk) (6). The receptor-calibration model (16, 24)
proposes that the effector or target cell needs to express sufficient
levels of receptor and ligand, respectively, to generate an inhibitory
signal. According to this model it can be hypothesized that NK cells
need to express Ly49A at higher levels to be inhibited by
H-2Dp- (or H-2Dk-) expressing targets than to
be inhibited by H-2Dd targets, in a situation where the
targets express the same number of MHC class I molecules.
It has been demonstrated that the cell surface expression of Ly49A is
markedly decreased on fresh NK cells derived from mice transgenic for
H-2Dd compared with their nontransgenic littermates (16, 17, 25, 26). Here we demonstrate that Ly49A is also down-regulated in
mice transgenic for the H-2Dp class I molecule. However,
the Ly49A expression in B6DP mice was not down-regulated to the same
extent as in D8 mice. The difference in Ly49A expression between D8 and
B6DP mice was significant (p < 0.05, Table III
). As discussed above, different affinity between
Ly49A/H-2Dd and Ly49A/H-2Dp or low expression
of H-2Dp on the cells that participate in the calibration
of Ly49A receptor may explain the observed Ly49A expression pattern in
B6DP and D8 mice. In contrast to Ly49A, B6DP and D8 mice were found to
have similar levels of Ly49G2 expression (p >
0.05, Table III
). These were reduced compared with those of
nontransgenic B6 mice, suggesting that H-2Dp may interact
also with Ly49G2. Additional work is needed to determine whether
H-2Dp is able to bind and inhibit Ly49G2+
cells. It is noteworthy that B6DP mice had similar numbers of
Ly49A+/NK1.1+ cells as B6 mice. In contrast, D8
mice have a somewhat decreased number of
Ly49A+/NK1.1+ cells (Table III
) (17). Notably,
the reduced number of Ly49A+ cells in D8 mice compared with
B6 mice could be accounted for by a reduction in the "double
positive" Ly49A+/G2+ subset only, whereas the
number of Ly49A+/G2- NK cells was rather
elevated in D8 mice (M. Johansson, unpublished observations). These
data can be explained within a model where NK cells expressing several
different inhibitory receptors for the same self MHC I molecules are
selected against (reviewed in 14).
The binding experiments and Ly49A receptor expression analysis suggest
that the interaction between H-2Dd and H-2Dp
molecules and the Ly49A receptor may not be completely identical. This
is in line with the observation that B6DP bone marrow cells were not
completely protected from rejection by D8 mice and that B6DP mice had a
lower ability to reject B6 bone marrow cells and RBL-5 tumor cells
compared with D8 mice (19). In addition, Glas et al. have demonstrated
that RBL-5Dp tumor cells are less efficiently protected
from NK cell-mediated rejection than RBL-5Dd tumor cells
when grafted into H-2d SCID mice (27). A structural
explanation could be that H-2Dd and H-2Dp share
some, but not all, critical motifs for Ly49A binding. The protection
has previously been mapped to the
1/
2 domains of
H-2Dd (6), and, more recently, Sundbäck et al. have
shown that the motif(s) determining allelic specificity of the Ly49A
receptor is located in the
2 domain of H-2Dd (28). This
does not exclude that conserved amino acid residues present in the
1
domain may also contribute to the interaction with Ly49A. To map the
protective motif(s) shared between H-2Dd and
H-2Dp class I molecules, it will be necessary to perform
extensive site-directed mutagenesis studies on the MHC class I
molecules and ultimately structural analysis of Ly49-MHC complexes.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Mats Y. Olsson-Alheim, Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center (MTC), Karolinska Institute, Box 280, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: B6, C57BL6; D8, H-2Dd-transgenic B6; B6DP, H-2Dp-transgenic B6. ![]()
Received for publication July 31, 1998. Accepted for publication March 22, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1/
2 domains. J. Immunol. 153:5482.[Abstract]
2 domain of H-2Dd restricts the allelic specificity of the murine NK cell inhibitory receptor Ly-49A. J. Immunol. 160:5971.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. Smith, T. Patterson, and M. E. Pauza Transgenic Ly-49A Inhibits Antigen-Driven T Cell Activation and Delays Diabetes J. Immunol., April 1, 2005; 174(7): 3897 - 3905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mitsuki, N. Matsumoto, and K. Yamamoto A species-specific determinant on {beta}2-microglobulin required for Ly49A recognition of its MHC class I ligand Int. Immunol., February 1, 2004; 16(2): 197 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sundback, A. Achour, J. Michaelsson, H. Lindstrom, and K. Karre NK Cell Inhibitory Receptor Ly-49C Residues Involved in MHC Class I Binding J. Immunol., January 15, 2002; 168(2): 793 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Fahlen, U. Lendahl, and C. L. Sentman MHC Class I-Ly49 Interactions Shape the Ly49 Repertoire on Murine NK Cells J. Immunol., June 1, 2001; 166(11): 6585 - 6592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Matsumoto, K. Tajima, M. Mitsuki, and K. Yamamoto H-2 allele specificity of the NK cell C-type lectin-like MHC class I receptor Ly49A visualized by soluble Ly49A tetramer Int. Immunol., May 1, 2001; 13(5): 615 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Makrigiannis, A. T. Pau, A. Saleh, R. Winkler-Pickett, J. R. Ortaldo, and S. K. Anderson Class I MHC-Binding Characteristics of the 129/J Ly49 Repertoire J. Immunol., April 15, 2001; 166(8): 5034 - 5043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Matsumoto, W. M. Yokoyama, S. Kojima, and K. Yamamoto The NK Cell MHC Class I Receptor Ly49A Detects Mutations on H-2Dd Inside and Outside of the Peptide Binding Groove J. Immunol., April 1, 2001; 166(7): 4422 - 4428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Chung, K. Natarajan, L. F. Boyd, J. Tormo, R. A. Mariuzza, W. M. Yokoyama, and D. H. Margulies Mapping the Ligand of the NK Inhibitory Receptor Ly49A on Living Cells J. Immunol., December 15, 2000; 165(12): 6922 - 6932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |