|
|
||||||||

*
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048; and
Seoul Surgical Clinic Banpo-4-dong 57-3, Seochogu, Seoul, Korea
.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B
or I-
Bß
levels following CD28 coligation. Furthermore, CD28 coligation fails to
enhance IL-2 promoter-reporter or RE/AP construct expression in
CD2-activated LPMC. The results reported herein indicate that the
molecular mechanisms involved in CD28 cosignaling and regulation of
IL-2 secretion in LP T cells are unique to that compartment and differ
from those seen in peripheral blood T cells. These observations suggest
a biological significance for different mechanisms of IL-2 activation
in initiation and maintenance of the cytokine repertoire found in the
mucosa. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B, AP-1 and OCT-binding proteins (2). Cooperative binding of
these trans-acting factors appears to determine the balance
of transcriptional activation. In addition to transcriptional
regulation of IL-2 mRNA levels, an inducible degradation mechanism has
been reported (3, 4). Production of IL-2 can be enhanced markedly by
treatment with translational inhibitors such as cycloheximide without
directly affecting the rate of IL-2 transcription (5).
Maximal activation of T cells requires two signals, the first of which
is generated by engagement of the TCR, with a second signal provided by
a costimulatory molecule. One major costimulatory T cell surface
molecule is CD28 (6, 7). IL-2 expression by CD28 costimulated
peripheral blood (PB)3 lymphocytes is
mediated transcriptionally as well as posttranscriptionally. CD28
costimulation activates transcription of IL-2 through the binding of
B-like transcription factors to a promoter motif defined as the CD28
response element (CD28RE) (8). The Rel family of proteins, p50, p65,
and c-Rel, are components of the transcriptional complex binding to the
CD28RE in PBMC (9). A major component of regulation of
B-like
transcription factors is the control of their intercellular
localization.
B-like transcription factors are normally shielded
within the cytoplasm through their physical interaction with the I-
B
inhibitory protein (10, 11). T cell activation results in the rapid and
transient decrease of I-
B, thereby releasing the transcriptionally
active
B factors and increasing translocation to the nucleus (10, 11). CD28-mediated IL-2 gene expression in PBMC is regulated likewise
by stabilization of IL-2 mRNA. The IL-2 mRNA possesses AU-rich
sequences within the 3' untranslated region identified as the target
signal for rapid mRNA degradation (12). While CD28 costimulation
enhances IL-2 mRNA stability, as well as the stability of other
cytokines, no preferential enhancement in the stability of
c-myc or c-fos was detected, notwithstanding the
presence of AU-rich motifs in the mRNA (13). Thus, regulation of IL-2
RNA t1/2 appears to be complex, involving
specific additional pathways that may be sensitive to the events
initiating T cell activation (14).
The activation pathways of PB T cells are different from those of lamina propria (LP) T cells (15, 16). LP T cells do not respond well to activation via the TCR/CD3 receptor. However, they do exhibit increased proliferation and cytokine production when activated via the CD2 pathway (16, 17). CD28 coligation further enhances the activation of LP T cells. LP T cells are generally thought to achieve a more intense activation state than PB T cells. The intensity can be amplified further as has been demonstrated in conditions of dysregulated inflammation such as Crohns disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). These disorders are characterized by widespread intestinal inflammation and an enhanced T cell activation state with increased production of inflammatory mediators including IL-2 (18).
We have developed a model of LP-like T cells by coculturing PB T cells in the presence of irradiated Daudi B cells and IL-2, which mimics a phenotype of CD2 pathway-dominant cytokine secretion similar to that seen in lamina propria lymphocytes. Previous studies have shown that the LP-like T cell model is validated by its functional equivalency to LP T cells, not only with regard to CD2 pathway dominance, but with identical phosphorylation patterns upon CD2 pathway stimulation as well (16). Furthermore, recent studies have provided evidence that the LP-like T cell activation model is most representative of the activated state of T cells present in inflamed CD mucosa, as evidenced by CD2-activated up-regulation of AP-1-transactivating factors with similar kinetic profiles (19). The LP-like T cell model has very similar activation properties to those expressed by LP mononuclear cells (LPMC) from inflamed CD mucosa, and allows investigations of the mechanism of cytokine gene regulation to be performed initially on a more easily manipulated experimental system.
Little is known regarding the underlying mechanisms regulating IL-2 secretion in LP T cells. Recent studies have suggested that regulation of IL-2 production in LPMC following CD2 activation may involve a distinct transcriptional regulatory mechanism different from that observed in T cell lines (19). The purpose of this study was to determine whether enhanced IL-2 secretion by CD2 and CD28 costimulation was the product of unique events that regulate transactivation of the IL-2 gene in LP T cells. The data in this study support the hypothesis that enhanced CD28-mediated IL-2 secretion following coligation with CD2 does not result from increased transactivational activity of the CD28RE or other elements within the first 600 bp of the IL-2 promoter. The results suggest that the molecular mechanisms involved in CD28 cosignaling and regulation of IL-2 secretion in LP T cells are unique from those involved in the peripheral compartment.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The murine T cell line, CTLL-2, was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and was maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS with 10 U/ml rIL-2 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The human B cell line, Daudi, was obtained from American Type Culture Collection and maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS.
Monoclonal Abs
Anti-CD2 mAbs (clones CB6 and GD10) were a gift from Chris Benjamin (Biogen, Cambridge, MA). Anti-CD28 mAB ascites, clone 9.3, was obtained from Bristol-Meyers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute (Princeton, NJ). The ascites was purified over a protein G column and quantified by ELISA.
Purification of LPMC and PBMC
Intestinal specimens were obtained from patients undergoing surgical resection of the colon (with colon carcinoma or treatment-resistant CD or UC) at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. Approval for the use of human subjects was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. In this study, all tissue specimens were taken from an uninvolved area of resected colon from patients with colonic carcinoma (normal), involved areas of patients with UC, as well as from uninvolved and involved areas of patients with CD. LPMC were isolated using a technique modified from that described previously (20). Briefly, the intestinal specimen was washed with HBSS, and the mucosa was dissected away from the underlying layers. The mucosal layer was incubated in a shaking water bath (100 rpm) in calcium- and magnesium-deficient HBSS, containing 1 mM EDTA, 50 µg/ml gentamicin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 50 µg/ml fungizone, with the solution changed every 30 min until the supernatant was free of epithelial cells. The remaining LP was minced into 1- to 2-mm pieces and digested for 10 min in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, 0.5 mg/ml collagenase B (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 0.1 mg/ml DNase I (Sigma), 50 µg/ml gentamicin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 50 µg/ml fungizone in shaker water bath (100 rpm). The supernatant was collected, filtered through 110-µm nylon mesh (Spectrum Laboratory Products, Houston, TX), and centrifuged at 500 x g for 5 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in 15 ml and centrifuged at 30 x g for 5 min to remove epithelial and other large cells. The supernatant was removed and lymphocytes were isolated by separation on Ficoll-Hypaque gradients. The cells were then washed three times with HBSS and resuspended in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS. PBMC were isolated from normal healthy volunteers by separation on Ficoll-Hypaque gradients.
Induction of LP-like T cells
Mononuclear cells from Ficoll-Hypaque gradients were cultured in RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS with a 1:5 ratio Daudi:lymphocytes plus 10 U/ml rIL-2 for 5 days (16). Daudi were irradiated with 3000 rad and washed three times in HBSS before addition to cultures. Following a 5-day culture, LP-like cells were washed with HBSS to remove dead Daudi cells (at this point, there were virtually no live Daudi cells in the culture as determined by flow cytometry).
Stimulation of mononuclear cells
For stimulation through the CD2 receptor, LPMC and LP-like T cells were stimulated with 0.1 µg anti-CD2 Abs (both CB6 and GD10 clones)/106 cells at 37°C for the times indicated for each experiment. CD28 costimulation was carried out with 0.1 µg anti-CD28 Ab. Stimulation of T cells with anti-CD2 Abs did not require further cross-linking, since the combination of two anti-CD2 Abs directed against different epitopes was sufficient to induce activation.
IL-2 bioassay
IL-2 activity was determined using a CTLL-2 bioassay (21). rIL-2 standards and dilutions of samples were added to 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) containing 5 x 103 CTLL-2/well and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Wells were then pulsed with 2 µCi/well [3H]thymidine for 4 h. Wells were harvested using a Harvester 96 (Tomtec, Orange, CT) microplate harvester and counted using a Microbeta 1450 liquid scintillation counter (Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD). Data acquisition and analysis was performed using the ELISA Master program for Macintosh computers, developed by R. L. Deem.
Northern blot analysis
Total cellular RNA was extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy kit (Chatsworth, CA). RNA was electrophoretically separated on a denaturing 1% agarose gel containing 7% formaldehyde. Gels were transferred to nylon membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) and hybridized to 32P-labeled DNA probe. Isolated cDNA insert was labeled by random priming and used at 106 cpm/ml of hybridization buffer. Blots were prehybridized (50% formamide, 0.75 M NaCl, 75 mM sodium citrate, 1x Denhardt solution, 25 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.5), and 100 µg/ml of sheared salmon sperm DNA) at 42°C for 2 h and hybridized overnight in prehybridization solution containing labeled probe and 10% dextran sulfate.
Nuclear run-on
A total of 5 x 107 LPMC were stimulated and
nuclei isolated as previously described (22). In vitro transcription
was carried out at 26°C for 20 min in transcription buffer (50 mM
HEPES (pH 7.9), 100 mM KCl, 2 mM DTT, 30 µM EDTA, 1 mM ATP, 0.5 mM
GTP, 0.5 mM CTP, 2 mM MnCl2, 35 mM
(NH4)2SO4, 8.8 mM creatine
phosphate, 40 µg/ml creatine phosphokinase), and 100 µCi of
[
-32P]UTP. Labeled mRNA transcripts were purified
using Qiagen Rneasy kit for liquid samples and hybridized to 2 µg of
cDNA insert immobilized on a nylon membrane.
Preparation of nuclear protein extracts
Nuclear protein extractions were carried out with 5 to 10 x 106 LPMC or LP-like T cells. Following activation, cells were centrifuged, washed in cold PBS, and kept on ice for subsequent extraction steps. The cell pellet was resuspended in 0.9 ml of RSB (10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, 2 µM leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM PMSF, and 0.1 mM EGTA), and 0.1 ml of 5% NP-40 was added. Samples were mixed by gentle inversion and kept on ice for 10 min followed by centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in 2560 µl (volume is dependent on the starting number of cells) of cold buffer C (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.42 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 25% v/v glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT, 20 µM leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM PMSF). Samples were incubated on ice for 3040 min during which time they were pipetted twice. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation and nuclear proteins were diluted with an equal volume of buffer D (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 50 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 20% v/v glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT, 20 mM leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM PMSF). Protein concentrations were determined by Coomassie Plus assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
EMSA
Double-stranded oligonucleotide was end-labeled with
[
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase. A total of
36 µg of nuclear extract protein was incubated at 25°C with 0.25
mg/ml poly(dI-dC), in 20% glycerol, 5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM
EDTA, 2.5 mM DTT, 250 mM NaCl, and 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5) for 10 min. The
oligonucleotide was then added (20,000 cpm) and the binding reactions
were incubated for an additional 30 min. Specificity was determined by
the addition of 100-fold excess unlabeled oligonucleotide as
competitor. The DNA-protein complexes were separated from unbound probe
on a prerun native 5% polyacrylamide gel in low ionic strength buffer
(22.3 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 22.3 mM borate, and 0.5 mM EDTA (pH 8.0)).
After 2 h, the gel was dried under vacuum and exposed to x-ray
film. The oligonucleotide used was the composite IL-2 CD28RE/AP site:
(5'-GTTTAAAGAAATTCCAAAGAGTCATCAG-3'). Nonspecific competitor
oligonucleotide used was: (5'-GAGCCTGATTTCCCCGAAATGATGAGC-3').
DNA constructs
The human IL-2 cDNA clone and ß-actin were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. A human IL-2 luciferase reporter plasmid containing a 600-bp fragment of the IL-2 promoter subcloned immediately 5' to the luciferase gene has been described previously (23). The human RE/AP and mutant RE/AP promoter-reporter constructs have been previously described (24) and were a generous gift from Virginia Smith-Shapiro and Arthur Weiss (University of California, San Francisco, CA). The plasmid TRE2 luciferase, used to determine AP-1-dependent trans-activation, was generated by subcloning three copies of the collagenase AP-1 binding sites into a luciferase reporter plasmid (a gift from M. Karin) (25).
Transfection
Freshly isolated LPMC and PBMC were primed for transfection competence by culturing for 16 or 20 h, respectively, in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS, 50 mM 2-ME, and 1 µg/ml PHA-L (Sigma) as previously described (19, 23). Cells were then washed and resuspended in 250 µl fresh medium at 2 x 107 cells/ml and electroporated in the presence of 50 µg of reporter construct (250 V, 2250 microfarads, 48 ohms) using 4-mm (gap width) cuvettes in a BTX Electro Cell Manipulator (Genetronics, San Diego, CA). After electroporation the cells were diluted in fresh medium, allowed to rest for 1 h prior to plating, and then stimulated with anti-CD2 or anti-CD2 + CD28 mAbs for 4 h. Since transfection of a single promoter was assayed for expression under different activation conditions, normalization for transfection efficiency was not necessary. However, multiple transfections with different preparation of reporter constructs gave similar results. Luminescence was measured using a Promega (Madison, WI) luciferase assay kit and counted on a 6-detector Wallac (Gaithersberg, MD) 1450 Microbeta liquid scintillation counter with coincidence counting turned off.
Western blotting
Samples containing 1015 µg of nuclear protein extracts were
separated on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel (10% polyacrylamide) and
transferred by electroblotting to nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond C,
Amersham). The membrane was blocked for 2 h with 5% nonfat milk
in TBS with 0.1% Tween-20 and analyzed for immunoreactivity with
antisera to I
B
and I
Bß (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa
Cruz, CA) with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system
(Pierce).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have described previously a model developed using in vitro-activated PB T cells, known as LP-like T cells, which reproduce the CD2-driven cytokine secretion phenotype seen in LP T cells (16, 19). LP T cells and LP-like T cells are significantly more responsive than PB T cells to activation via the CD2 pathway than the CD3 pathway, as exhibited by the secretion of IL-2 and other cytokines (16). Coligation of CD2, but not CD3, with CD28 resulted in a marked increase of IL-2 secretion in LPMC and LP-like T cells (16).
To assess the molecular mechanisms of CD28-enhanced IL-2 secretion, we
first examined the kinetics of IL-2 production following activation of
LPMC and LP-like T cells via the CD2 pathway in the presence or absence
of CD28 costimulation. As shown in Fig. 1
A, measurable amounts of IL-2
were detected in supernatants of LPMC isolated from inflamed mucosa as
early as 3 h following CD2 activation. IL-2 levels continued to
increase over 24 h. CD28 costimulation resulted in a striking
increase of IL-2 production at all time points measured. CD28
coligation of LP-like T cells likewise resulted in enhancement of IL-2
secretion at all time points tested (Fig. 1
B).
|
|
Costimulation by CD28 enhances mRNA stability in LPMC and LP-like T cell activated via the CD2 pathway
The increased IL-2 mRNA accumulation induced by CD2 and CD28
coligation could be related to an increase in mRNA transcription,
processing, and/or enhanced mRNA stability. To determine whether this
augmentation was related to mRNA stability, LPMC from inflamed mucosa
were preactivated by CD2 or CD2 and CD28 for 2 h (maximum for mRNA
expression in LPMC is 24 h). Actinomycin D was added to prevent
further transcription, and mRNA decay was monitored for the time
periods indicated in Fig. 3
A.
CD28 coligation extended the t1/2 of IL-2
mRNA from 70 to 180 min. A strikingly similar result was obtained with
LP-like T cells. LP-like T cells were preactivated by CD2 or CD2 and
CD28 for 5 h (to maximize mRNA expression in LP-like T cells). As
seen in Fig. 3
B, the t1/2 of
IL-2 mRNA from CD2-activated LP-like T cells was 60 min compared with
over 200 min following CD28 costimulation. Thus, CD28 costimulation
increases the stability of IL-2 mRNA in both LPMC and LP-like T cells
activated via the CD2 pathway.
|
Previous studies carried out with activated PBMC have reported
increased transcription after CD28 costimulation of the CD3 pathway
(26). To determine the contribution of CD28 signaling on initiation of
IL-2 gene transcription in LPMC, run-on assays were performed. Nuclei
were isolated from LPMC activated by CD2 in the presence or absence of
CD28 costimulation. As seen in Fig. 4
,
while IL-2 gene transcription was undetectable in unstimulated LPMC,
following CD2 activation induction of IL-2 transcription was evident.
CD28 costimulation, however, did not result in an increased
transcriptional rate above that observed by CD2 alone (Fig. 4
). Under
all conditions, close to equivalent levels of ß-actin were detected.
No increase in signal was detected hybridizing to the plasmid vector
alone (Fig. 4
B). To further study transcriptional
activation, a wild-type IL-2 promoter reporter luciferase construct
encompassing the CD28RE, known to be involved in CD28 enhanced gene
transcription in PBMC, was transfected into LPMC activated by CD2, and
LPMC activated by CD2 and CD28. Fig. 5
shows that in contrast to results in PBMC, CD2 + CD28 coligation
did not significantly increase IL-2 transcription in LPMC from normal
or inflamed mucosa over that induced by CD2 alone. As reported
recently, CD2 signaling in LPMC is transmitted in part by induction of
AP-1-transactivating factors (19). Fig. 6
demonstrates that while CD2 ligation results in transactivation of a
multimeric AP-1-binding TRE2 reporter construct in LPMC from normal or
inflamed mucosa, coligation of CD28 was unable to further enhance
promoter activity. These results indicate that while there is an
increase in the IL-2 promoter activity following CD2 pathway activation
of LPMC, costimulation in the presence of CD28 does not further
increase transcriptional activity.
|
|
|
B function in LPMC and
LP-like T cells
Previous studies have identified a CD28RE within the IL-2 promoter
region that is required for transcriptional induction of IL-2 gene
expression by CD28 costimulated PBMC and T cell lines (8, 9, 26). It is
believed that the complexes binding to the CD28RE are members of the
NF-
B/Rel family, the function of which is regulated by sequestration
of binding of inhibitory I-
B proteins (10, 11). The results depicted
in Fig. 5
suggest that while the IL-2 promoter containing the CD28RE
responds to CD2 activation, the CD28RE is not the site at which
transactivation is enhanced following CD28 coligation. To assess the
effect of CD28 coligation on functional regulation of the CD28RE in our
system, LP-like T cells were activated with CD2 in the presence or
absence of CD28 costimulation and nuclear proteins were analyzed for
binding to the composite CD28RE/AP-1 cis regulatory element
by EMSA. As shown in Fig. 7
, a very
modest increase in binding of complexes to the CD28RE/AP-1 element was
detected following CD2 activation. No additional alteration in the
binding of this complex was detectable following CD28 costimulation.
Furthermore, Western blot analysis revealed that CD2 activation
precipitated a striking loss of I
B
within 2 h, which was
then rapidly restored (Fig. 8
A). A similar decrease from
baseline of I-
B
was generated by CD28 costimulation. I
Bß
proteins were not significantly altered following CD2 activation
whether or not CD28 was present (Fig. 8
B). This data are
consistent with transfection functional analysis and the EMSA data,
suggesting that CD28 costimulation does not result in an increase in
either binding of trans-acting factors to the CD28RE
promoter region or increased promoter activation over that induced by
CD2 alone.
|
|
Previous studies carried out in T cell lines have demonstrated
that transactivation of IL-2 gene expression following CD28 coligation
is conferred through a composite element, RE/AP, consisting of the
synergistic interaction of both the CD28RE and the adjacent
nonconsensus AP-1-binding site (24). Mutation of either one of these
components was sufficient for abolishing the CD28 response of RE/AP
promoter-reporter constructs transfected into T cell lines. The data
presented above supported the hypothesis that following CD28
costimulation of LPMC no transcriptional up-regulation of the IL-2
promoter could be detected over that observed in the presence of CD2
alone. However, most of the information regarding our understanding of
transcriptional regulation of IL-2 expression has been performed in T
cell line systems rather than primary T cells. Therefore, it seemed
possible that the failure to detect transcriptional up-regulation
following CD28 coactivation of LPMC might not be unique for mucosal T
cells but, rather, might be due to unique transcriptional regulatory
mechanisms related to primary T cells compared with T cell lines. In
order to investigate this possibility, PBMC were transfected with
multimerized RE/AP and mutant RE/AP reporter constructs, and expression
compared with that of LPMC following CD2 and CD2 + CD28
costimulation. Fig. 9
shows that there is
approximately a 10-fold activation of the composite RE/AP construct in
response to CD2 stimulation in both peripheral T cells and LPMC.
Moreover, similar to up-regulation of the RE/AP element described for T
cell lines, in peripheral T cells transfected with the RE/AP reporter
construct following CD28 costimulation, there is enhanced promoter
transactivation (Fig. 9
, from 14- to 300-fold); however, in contrast to
peripheral T cells, in LPMC from normal mucosa following CD2 +
CD28 coligation, only a marginal 2-fold increase in RE/AP reporter
activation was noted over that induced by CD2 alone. CD28 stimulation
alone did not activate promoter-reporter constructs in all cells tested
(data not shown). Likewise, mutation of either the CD28RE or adjacent
nonconsensus AP-1 site abolished CD2 responsiveness. These results
indicate that the regulatory mechanisms involved in IL-2 gene
expression following CD28 pathway stimulation in LPMC are distinct from
those observed in peripheral T cell and T cell lines.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B-like factors
paralleled by rapid decrease of I
B
. Costimulation with CD28 does
not alter this pattern of expression. These results highlight again the
utility of the LP-like T cell model as a system with analogous
activation properties to those expressed by LPMC, which allows
investigations of mucosal cytokine gene regulation to be performed
initially on a more easily manipulated experimental system. Numerous studies have been carried out in PBMC and tumor T cell lines activated through the TCR and CD28 costimulation, which indicated that CD28 synergism was due to both increased IL-2 mRNA transcription as well as enhanced mRNA stability (8, 13, 27, 28). CTLA-4 expression is likewise enhanced in a synergistic fashion following TCR and CD28 costimulation involving a mechanism contributed by both transcriptional and posttranscriptional components (29). However, studies performed with murine T cell clones suggest that in these cells increased IL-2 mRNA production is mediated by a more complex series of events (30). Regulation on a nuclear level does not involve modification of transcriptional activity of the IL-2 enhancer, but rather is the result of increased expression of unspliced IL-2 pre-mRNA (30). A similar mechanism of posttranscriptional regulation of IL-2 expression, at the level of pre-mRNA splicing and processing, has been reported in PBMC activated with PHA but without CD28 costimulation (5). Thus, it remains uncertain as to whether the nuclear effects of CD28 costimulation involve transcriptional activation of the IL-2 promoter in different cell systems.
The vast majority of information acquired regarding transcriptional
activation of the IL-2 promoter by CD28 costimulation has been obtained
from experiments using human and murine T cell lines. It should be
noted that, although primary T cells must be suboptimally activated
with PHA in order to achieve transfection competency, no transcription
is detectable in the absence of stimulation (19). Recent studies have
indicated that regulation of IL-2 gene expression in primary T cells
differs from that observed in tumor T cell lines. For example, NF-AT
sites are much less important in primary T cells than in tumor T cell
lines, while the proximal AP-1 and NF-
B sites are of critical
importance (23). In addition, expression of an IL-2 promoter construct
mutated at the CD28RE site and transfected into primary T cells
resulted in reduced expression following CD28 costimulation; however,
mutation of this site did not affect expression following CD2
activation. Moreover, the appearance of components of
cis-regulatory factors binding to the CD28RE, particularly
c-rel, has been reported to be closely linked with CD28 costimulation
in tumor T cell lines, which has not been the case in primary T cells
(31). In PBMC following PMA stimulation alone, c-rel binding to the
CD28RE was detected in the absence of IL-2 secretion. While
costimulation by CD28 did result in enhanced c-rel binding, the
presence of CD28 cis-binding factors in cells not actively
expressing IL-2 indicate that binding to the CD28RE is not exclusively
a response to CD28 costimulation (31). A similar finding of
CD28-independent transcriptional activation was reported following CD3
plus PMA costimulation and reporter gene transactivation of a CD28RE
promoter-reporter construct (32).
The CD28RE has been reported to bind
B-like proteins, and CD28
costimulation results in the rapid down-regulation of I
B
and
concordant translocation of c-rel to the nucleus in PBMC and T cell
lines (33). These reports conflict with our observations of LPMC
costimulated with CD28. While CD2 activation modestly increases
expression of factors binding to the CD28RE, CD28 costimulation did not
further enhance this effect. Likewise, a rapid decrease in the level of
I
B
was detected following CD2 activation, however, no further or
sustained decrease was detected following CD28 costimulation.
Recent evidence suggests that the CD28RE does not function as a discrete element but rather is part of a composite RE/AP site, consisting of the CD28RE and the adjacent AP-1 (24). The importance of AP-1 involvement in regulation of c-rel activity and IL-2 expression is supported by the finding that overexpression of c-rel greatly up-regulates AP-1 expression. Not only is binding to the consensus AP-1 sequence increased, but more importantly, the binding to the nonconsensus AP-1 sequence immediately adjacent to the CD28RE is enhanced as well (34). The requirement for a composite regulatory site is further supported by studies demonstrating that the HIV tax responsiveness region of the IL-2 promoter requires both the CD28RE and the adjacent AP-1 regions (35). These findings suggest that the CD28RE might be functionally redundant and thereby mediate more than one signaling pathway. Our data suggest that, at least in regard to the composite RE/AP, peripheral T cells behave in a manner similar to that of T cell lines while transactivation of LP T cell entails unique cis-regulatory elements. It is quite likely that the cell system as well as the mode of T cell activation may influence regulation of IL-2 gene transcription.
Interpretation of the data obtained through functional expression of transfected IL-2 promoter-reporter construct are subject to an important bias in that they are reflective of the sequences selected, while elements residing outside of the chosen promoter region would not be detected. In this study, transfection experiments were carried out utilizing a 600-bp IL-2 promoter construct that encompasses the highly conserved region defined as the critical IL-2 promoter element. However, DNase I hypersensitive sites have been identified within 3 kb upstream of the IL-2 transcriptional start site (36, 37). Additionally, the EMSA analyses were conducted utilizing the well-studied CD28RE/AP-1 composite element. Likewise, transcriptional run-on assays, although the methods of choice in analyzing fluctuations in the rate of transcription initiation are susceptible to attenuation through DNA sequences within a gene (37). It is possible that sequences other than those studied might play a role in transcriptional regulation following CD28 costimulation in LPMC, albeit unlikely considering that inhibitory elements have been reported residing upstream of the 600-bp promoter element. Studies are underway to identify other regions that might respond to CD28 costimulation and regulate transcriptional activation in LPMC.
An increase in mRNA stability in PBMC and T cell tumor cell lines
following CD28 costimulation has been reported for numerous cytokines,
including IL-2, IFN-
, GM-CSF, and TNF-
(13). Little is known
about posttranscriptional regulation of IL-2 expression, however,
several cytokines and transiently expressed proto-oncogenes contain one
or more highly conserved AUUUA motifs in the 3'-UT region of their mRNA
(12). These consensus elements are determinants for rapid degradation,
probably through interaction with specific proteins that can be
cross-linked to these AU-rich domains (38). Nonetheless, while CD28
costimulation results in the stabilization of IL-2 mRNA, the
proto-oncogenes c-fos, and c-myc were not further
stabilized, despite the fact that the mRNAs of these factors possess
multiple AUUUA sequences (13). Recent studies of regulation of IL-2
mRNA stability in T cell lines indicate that multiple mechanisms
regulate IL-2 mRNA stability and suggest that both 5' as well as 3'
sequences within the untranslated region of the IL-2 mRNA are critical
for stabilization (39). Furthermore, in activated T cell lines,
activation of the c-jun amino-terminal kinase is involved in
IL-2 mRNA transcription and stabilization. Thus, it would appear that
multiple posttranscriptional mechanisms other than the AUUUA motifs
regulate IL-2 mRNA stability.
In summary, the studies presented here show that regulation of IL-2
expression in LPMC and LP-like T cells differs from that observed in
PBMC. CD28 costimulation of LPMC increased IL-2 production paralleled
by increased expression of IL-2 mRNA due in part to enhanced IL-2 mRNA
stability. However, in contrast to CD28-mediated transcriptional
activation in PBMC, EMSA analysis revealed that CD28 coligation of LPMC
did not augment binding of trans-acting factors to the
CD28RE or alterations in I
B
or I
Bß levels. Although
CD2-enhanced IL-2 secretion is reflected by transactivation of IL-2
promoter reporter constructs transfected into LPMC, there was no
enhanced CD28-mediated promoter activation following coligation. In
addition, these studies represent the first reports of transcriptional
activation of the RE/AP composite element in response to CD2
stimulation. These observations suggest a biological significance for
different mechanisms of IL-2 gene activation in initiation and
maintenance of cytokine production in the mucosa. Furthermore, these
results strengthen the use of LP-like T cells as a model for LP T cell
activation and the analysis of mucosal cytokine gene regulation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Stephan R. Targan, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, D4063, Los Angeles, CA 90048. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: PB, peripheral blood; LP, lamina propria; LPMC, LP mononuclear cells; UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, Crohns disease; CD28RE, CD28 response element. ![]()
Received for publication August 19, 1998. Accepted for publication March 16, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-interferon. Nature 297:236.[Medline]
B family: c-Rel, p50, and p65. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:1696.
B
is necessary for activation of transcription factor NF-
B. Nature 365:182.[Medline]
B/rel transcription factor and I
B inhibitor system. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5:477.[Medline]
B-like response element. J. Biol. Chem. 266:14179.
B proteins: multifunctional regulators of Rel/NF-
B transcription factors. Genes Dev. 7:2064.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Gonsky, R. L. Deem, J. H. Bream, D. H. Lee, H. A. Young, and S. R. Targan Mucosa-Specific Targets for Regulation of IFN-{gamma} Expression: Lamina Propria T Cells Use Different cis-Elements than Peripheral Blood T Cells to Regulate Transactivation of IFN-{gamma} Expression J. Immunol., February 1, 2000; 164(3): 1399 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |