The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staats, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ennis, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Staats, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ennis, F. A., Jr.
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 162: 6141-6147.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

IL-1 Is an Effective Adjuvant for Mucosal and Systemic Immune Responses When Coadministered with Protein Immunogens1

Herman F. Staats2 and Francis A. Ennis, Jr.

Departments of Medicine and Immunology, Center for AIDS Research, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mucosal immunization with soluble protein Ag alone may induce Ag-specific tolerance, whereas mucosal immunization with Ag in the presence of a mucosal adjuvant may induce Ag-specific systemic and mucosal humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. The most widely used and studied mucosal adjuvant is cholera toxin (CT). Although the mechanism of adjuvanticity of CT is not completely understood, it is known that CT induces mucosal epithelial cells to produce the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6, and IL-8 and up-regulates macrophage production of IL-1 and the costimulatory molecule B7.2. Because IL-1 may duplicate many of the activities of CT, we evaluated IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß for their ability to serve as mucosal adjuvants when intranasally administered with soluble protein Ags. IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were as effective as CT for the induction of Ag-specific serum IgG, vaginal IgG and IgA, systemic delayed-type hypersensitivity, and lymphocyte proliferative responses when intranasally administered with soluble protein Ag. Our results indicate that IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß may be useful as mucosal vaccine adjuvants. Such an adjuvant may be useful, and possibly required, for vaccine-mediated protection against pathogens that infect via the mucosal surfaces of the host such as HIV.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mucosal immune responses (secretory IgA, mucosal T helper, and CTL) may play a crucial role in host protection against infectious agents that infect via the mucosal surfaces of the host, including HIV, HSV, respiratory syncytial virus, Bordetella pertussis, and Salmonella typhimurium (1). A major obstacle in the development effective mucosal vaccines is the identification of a safe and effective mucosal adjuvant. Indeed, mucosal (gastric, nasal, rectal, etc.) immunization with soluble protein or peptide immunogens in the absence of mucosal adjuvants may induce a state of Ag-specific immunological tolerance known as oral tolerance or, more appropriately, mucosally induced tolerance (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). In contrast, mucosal immunization with soluble protein Ags or peptides coadministered with a mucosal adjuvant such as cholera toxin (CT),3 pertussis toxin (PT), or heat-labile toxin (LT) induces potent systemic and mucosal, humoral, and cell-mediated immune responses (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15).

The most potent and best-studied mucosal adjuvant is CT (13, 16, 17, 18, 19). However, CT is not safe for use as a mucosal adjuvant in humans because as little as 5 µg of CT causes massive diarrhea when intragastrically administered to human volunteers (20). Although the use of CT as a mucosal adjuvant in research animals is generally well tolerated, in some cases the use of CT was associated with the production of Ag-specific IgE responses and lethal anaphylactic reactions (21, 22). To repress the toxicity associated with toxin adjuvants, mutant CT, LT, and PT molecules have been produced that exhibit reduced or undetectable toxic activity while maintaining mucosal adjuvant activity (15, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). Although these molecules possess potent adjuvant activity in the absence of toxicity, they maintain immunogenic properties when administered to experimental animals (23, 29, 30). Unfortunately, the immunogenicity of these mutant toxin molecules may also prevent their widespread repeated use as mucosal adjuvants because pre-existing immunity to CT reduces its adjuvant activity (31, 32).

Exactly how CT (or LT or PT) acts as a mucosal adjuvant is not completely understood. When used as a mucosal adjuvant, CT has been reported to facilitate Ag access to the mucosal immune system (31), enhance the induction of Ag-specific T and B cells (33, 34), and up-regulate the expression of the costimulatory molecule B7.2 on mucosal APC (35). The adjuvant activity of CT has also been associated with its ability to induce cytokine secretion by a variety of cell types (Table IGo). For example, treatment of the P388D1 M* cell line with CT enhanced the production of IL-1 and the APC activity of the cells in an alloreactive T cell proliferation assay (36). Treatment of CT-stimulated P388D1 cells with anti-IL-1{alpha} completely abrogated the CT-enhanced APC activity (36). CT also enhanced IgA production in surface IgA- spleen B cells, and CT-enhanced IgA production could be blocked by anti-TGF-ß Abs (37). Therefore, CT-enhanced APC activity in macrophages and IgA production by B cells can be attributed to CT-stimulated production of IL-1{alpha} and TGF-ß, respectively (36, 37). Additionally, the CT-induced cytokines IL-1 and TGF-ß may duplicate many responses induced by CT (37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44) (Table IGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Literature reports of the ability of mucosal adjuvants and cytokines to induce cytokine production and enhance APC activity1

 
A safe and effective mucosal adjuvant is clearly needed to aid the development of effective mucosal vaccines. Although CT is an effective mucosal adjuvant, its toxicity and immunogenicity may preclude its use in humans (see above). Because many of the activities induced by CT could be duplicated with specific cytokines (Table IGo), our hypothesis is that the adjuvanticity of CT is due to its ability to induce the local production of proinflammatory cytokines that create an immunological microenvironment suitable for the induction of systemic and mucosal immune responses. Because IL-1 secretion was induced by CT, IL-1 was responsible for CT-enhanced APC function of macrophages, IL-1 duplicates many of the activities of CT, and IL-1 is a potent proinflammatory cytokine that induces the production of many additional cytokines, we formed the additional hypothesis that coadministration of IL-1 with soluble protein Ags by the nasal route will induce Ag-specific systemic and mucosal immune responses. The present study was performed to determine whether IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß exhibited mucosal adjuvant activity when intranasally administered with soluble protein Ags. Our results indicated that IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were as effective as cholera toxin for the induction of Ag-specific systemic and mucosal immune responses.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

Female BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, 16–18 g, were purchased from Frederick Cancer Research and Developmental Center, National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). Animals were housed in filter-top cages and provided food and water ad libitum. All procedures for use and care of mice were approved by Duke University’s institutional animal care and use committee.

Immunization

Mice were intranasally immunized as previously described (10, 11, 14). Briefly, mice (three or four mice per group) were intranasally immunized with the indicated concentration (Table IIGo) of OVA (A-5503, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or tetanus toxoid (TT; provided by Drs. Dennis Katkocin and John Eldridge, Wyeth-Lederle Vaccines and Pediatrics, Pearl River, NY) and the indicated adjuvant in a total volume of 15 µl (7.5 µl/nostril). The mucosal adjuvant CT was obtained from List Biological Laboratories (Campbell, CA). Recombinant human IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were obtained from the National Cancer Institute Biological Resources Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center. The recombinant human IL-1{alpha} had a sp. act. of 3.0 x 108 U/mg, while recombinant human IL-1ß had a sp. act. of 1.81 x 107 U/mg. Ag preparations were diluted to the appropriate concentration in sterile distilled water, and 7.5 µl of the Ag mixture was introduced into each nostril while mice were under isoflurane anesthesia (IsoFlo, USP, Solvay Animal Health, Mendota Heights, MN).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Immunization protocols to evaluate the mucosal adjuvant activity of IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß1

 
Sample collection

Blood was collected from the retro-orbital plexus using a heparinized Natelson capillary tube (Baxter Healthcare, McGaw Park, IL) while mice were under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia. Vaginal wash samples were collected by washing the vaginal cavity with 100 µl of sterile PBS while mice were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine. This procedure resulted in an approximately 10-fold dilution of vaginal samples (10). All samples were stored at -20°C until assayed for Ag-specific Abs.

ELISA

An ELISA was used to determine the presence of Ag-specific Abs in serum and vaginal wash samples. The ELISA was performed as previously reported (10, 11), except that ELISA plates were coated with OVA or TT at 5 µg/ml. The end-point titer represents the reciprocal log2 dilution of the last sample whose OD was at least 2-fold higher than the OD of a corresponding naive sample. The geometric mean titer and SD were calculated using the log2 end-point titers and then were transformed to the antilog for figures and tables. All statistical evaluations were performed with the log2 data. Due to the small vaginal lavage sample sizes, vaginal IgG and IgA responses are reported as end-point ELISA titers instead of standardizing them based on total IgG and IgA concentrations (10, 11). Detection reagents for the ELISA were purchased from Southern Biotechnology Associates (Birmingham, AL). IgG subclass detection reagents were specific for the indicated IgG subclass (i.e., there was no cross-reactivity among the IgG subclass reagents).

Cell isolation and proliferation assay

Spleens were aseptically removed, and single-cell suspensions were produced by cutting the spleen into small pieces (~5 mm x 5 mm) and expressing the cells from the splenic capsule with the sterile end of a 5-cc syringe plunger. RBC were removed by centrifugation over Cappel Lymphocyte Separation Medium (ICN, Aurora, OH). Cells were adjusted to 2 x 106 cells/ml in complete T cell medium (RPMI 1640, 10% FBS, HEPES, Pen/Strep, and 2-ME). To an equal volume of cells was added an equal volume of complete T cell medium or medium containing 0.2 µg/ml of the appropriate Ag (OVA or TT) to give a final cell density of 1 x 106 cells/ml and Ag at 0.1 µg/ml. Cells (100 µl) were added to round-bottom 96-well microtiter plates in triplicate and were incubated in a 37°C, 10% CO2 in air, humidified environment for 5 days. Four to six hours before harvesting, 0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine (New England Nuclear Research Products, Boston, MA) was added to each well. Cells were harvested onto glass filters using a PHD sample harvester (Cambridge Technology, Watertown, MA). Incorporation was determined by placing the filters in ScintiVerse BD scintillation fluid (Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA) and counting with a 2000CA Tri-Carb liquid scintillation analyzer (Packard, Downers Grove, IL).

Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH)

For the measurement of DTH responses, an ear swelling assay was employed as previously described (10, 11). Briefly, 25 µg of immunization Ag was injected into the right ear in 10 µl of sterile PBS while 10 µl of sterile PBS was injected into the left ear as a control. Ear swelling was measured 24–48 h after injection with a dial thickness gauge (Mitutoyo thickness cage #7326, Kawasaki, Japan). Ag-specific ear swelling was calculated by subtracting the ear swelling of the PBS-injected ear from the swelling of the Ag-injected ear. DTH ear-swelling units are 10-4 inches (i.e., 1 DTH unit = 1 x 10-4 inches).

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA, with comparison of multiple means using Bonferroni’s (Dunn) t tests, Sidak’s t tests, and Tukey’s Studentized range test on SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). A difference was considered significantly different if two of three tests indicated a significant difference. The level of significance used was 0.05. Error bars represent the SD.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß enhance serum Ag-specific IgG responses when intranasally administered with soluble protein Ags

To determine whether IL-1{alpha} or IL-1ß possessed mucosal adjuvant activity, BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice were intranasally immunized with Ag alone or with Ag in the presence of CT, IL-1{alpha}, or IL-1ß (Table IIGo). In Expt. 1, BALB/c mice were intranasally immunized with 100 µg of OVA on days 0, 14, and 28 in the absence of adjuvants or in the presence of 1 µg of CT, 4 µg of IL-1{alpha}, or 4 µg of IL-1ß administered with all immunizations or with the first immunization only (Table IIGo). Both IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were able to serve as mucosal adjuvants when intranasally administered with OVA with all immunizations (three times) or with the first immunization only (p < 0.05 compared with no adjuvant control). When coadministered with all three immunizations, the day 42 serum anti-OVA IgG titers for the IL-1{alpha}, IL-1ß, and CT groups were 1/262,144, 1/104,031, and 1/13,004, respectively (Fig. 1Go, Expt. 1). IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were also effective adjuvants when administered with the first immunization only, resulting in serum anti-OVA IgG titers of 1/26,008 and 1/13,004, respectively. Anti-OVA IgG titers were <1/100 in the sera collected from mice immunized with no adjuvant or with CT administered with the first immunization only (Fig. 1Go, Expt. 1). IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were also tested at a 1.3-µg dose (3-fold dilution of 4 µg) administered with all three nasal immunizations (days 0, 14, and 28). IL-1{alpha} at 1.3 µg induced a day 42 serum anti-OVA IgG end-point titer of 1/46,341, while IL-1ß at 1.3 µg induced a day 42 serum anti-OVA IgG end-point titer of 1/2,048 (data not shown). Because IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were more effective at the 4-µg dose, subsequent studies used only the 4-µg dose.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Serum Ag-specific IgG end-point titers (reciprocal) after intranasal immunization as indicated in Table IIGo. #1, Expt. 1; #2, Expt. 2; #3, Expt. 3. For Expt. 1, BALB/c mice were immunized on days 0, 14, and 28 with 100 µg of OVA. For Expt. 2 (C57BL/6) and Expt. 3 (BALB/c), mice were immunized on days 0, 7, and 14 with 50 µg of TT. Results for Expt. 1 represent day 42 serum. Results for Expt. 2 and 3 represent day 21 serum. There were three or four mice per group in each experiment. a, Significantly greater than "none" control (p < 0.05). Bars represent the mean for each group; error bars indicate the SD.

 
To determine whether IL-1{alpha} and/or IL-1ß exhibited mucosal adjuvant activity when coadministered with a more relevant vaccine Ag, C57BL/6 (Expt. 2) or BALB/c (Expt. 3) mice were intranasally immunized with 50 µg of TT alone or in the presence of adjuvants (Table IIGo). To comply with other published mucosal immunization protocols (9, 22), mice were immunized on days 0, 7, and 14 for Expt. 2 and 3 (Table IIGo). IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were effective mucosal adjuvants when intranasally administered with 50 µg of TT on days 0, 7, and 14 in both C57BL/6 (Expt. 2) and BALB/c (Expt. 3) mice (p < 0.05 compared with no adjuvant control). When administered with all three immunizations, day 21 serum anti-TT titers for IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß groups were 1/155,872 and 1/208,064 for C57BL/6 mice, respectively, and 1/165,140 and 1/208,064, respectively, for BALB/c mice (Fig. 1Go, Expt. 2 and 3). IL-1{alpha} also exhibited significant adjuvant activity when intranasally administered to BALB/c mice with TT on day 0 only (p < 0.05 compared with no adjuvant control). Within the same experiment, there were no significant differences between any of the CT, IL-1{alpha}, or IL-1ß adjuvant groups.

Ag-specific IgG subclass end-point titers were measured to compare the Ag-specific IgG subclass responses induced by IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß to those induced by CT. The Ag-specific IgG subclass profiles associated with the use of IL-1{alpha} or IL-1ß as a mucosal adjuvant were comparable to those induced by the use of CT as a mucosal adjuvant (Table IIIGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Ag-specific serum IgG subclass profiles after intranasal immunization using IL-1{alpha} or IL-1ß as mucosal adjuvants1

 
IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß induce mucosal IgA responses when used as a mucosal adjuvant

Vaginal lavage samples were monitored for the presence of Ag-specific IgG and IgA to determine whether IL-1{alpha} or IL-1ß could induce Ag-specific IgA responses when used as a mucosal vaccine adjuvant. In all experiments IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were as effective as CT in their ability to induce the production of Ag-specific mucosal IgA and IgG responses (Fig. 2Go). In Expt. 1 when the adjuvants were used with all three immunizations, the day 42 vaginal anti-OVA IgA titers for the IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß groups were 1/32 and 1/128, respectively, compared with an undetectable anti-OVA IgA response in the CT group (Fig. 2Go, Expt. 1). Even when used with the first immunization only, IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß induced anti-OVA IgA responses that were detectable in vaginal lavage samples (Fig. 2Go, Expt. 1). In Expt. 2 and 3, the use of IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß with all immunizations consistently induced Ag-specific vaginal IgA titers that were 2- to 8-fold higher than those induced by CT (Fig. 2Go, Expt. 2 and 3). When administered with TT for the first immunization only, IL-1{alpha} (Expt. 3) and IL-1ß (Expt. 2 and 3) induced the production of anti-TT vaginal IgA responses.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Vaginal Ag-specific IgA end-point titers (reciprocal) after intranasal immunization as indicated in Table IIGo. There were three or four mice per group in each experiment. #1, Expt. 1; #2, Expt. 2; #3, Expt. 3. For Expt. 1, BALB/c mice were immunized on days 0, 14, and 28 with 100 µg of OVA. For Expt. 2 (C57BL/6) and Expt. 3 (BALB/c), mice were immunized on days 0, 7, and 14 with 50 µg of TT. Results for Expt. 1 represent day 42 samples, while Expt. 2 and 3 represent day 23 vaginal lavage samples. Solid bars, IgA; open bars, IgG. Vaginal lavage samples were pooled from mice for each group.

 
IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß induce cell-mediated immune responses when used as a mucosal adjuvant

Ear-swelling DTH responses were used as in indicator of in vivo cell-mediated immune responses after intranasal immunization with soluble protein Ags alone or in the presence of CT, IL-1{alpha}, or IL-1ß. When intranasally administered with OVA for all three immunizations (Expt. 1), IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß induced DTH ear-swelling responses (114 ± 8.9 and 106 ± 7.6 DTH units, respectively) that were significantly greater than those induced by any other group (p < 0.05; Fig. 3Go). In subsequent studies, IL-1{alpha} (Expt. 3) and IL-1ß (Expt. 2) induced DTH ear-swelling responses that were significantly greater than those induced by immunization in the absence of adjuvant (p < 0.05) and were comparable to those induced by CT. The use of IL-1 with the first immunization only did not induce significantly elevated DTH ear-swelling responses.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Ag-specific DTH ear swelling responses after intranasal immunization as indicated in Table IIGo. There were three or four mice per group in each experiment. #1, Expt. 1; #2, Expt. 2; #3, Expt. 3. For Expt. 1, BALB/c mice were immunized on days 0, 14, and 28 with 100 µg of OVA. For Expt. 2 (C57BL/6) and Expt. 3 (BALB/c), mice were immunized on days 0, 7, and 14 with 50 µg of TT. Results for Expt. 1, 2, and 3 represent day 43, 49, and 35 ear swelling responses, respectively. a, Significantly greater than "none" control (p < 0.05). b, Significantly greater than none, CT given with all three injections (CT x 3), CT given with only the first injection (CT x 1), IL-1{alpha} given with the first injection (IL-1{alpha} x 1), and IL-1ß given with the first injection (IL-1ß x 1) groups. DTH ear-swelling units are 10-4 inches (i.e., 1 DTH unit = 1 x 10-4 inches). Bars represent the mean for each group; error bars indicate the SD.

 
Ag-induced lymphocyte proliferative responses were also monitored as an indicator of Ag-specific, cell-mediated immune responses. Both IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß induced lymphocyte proliferative responses comparable to those induced by CT (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Ag-specific lymphocyte proliferative responses in splenocytes from animals immunized as indicated in Table IIGo. Splenocytes were harvested on day 56 for Expt. 2 and 3. Solid boxes represent counts per minute for splenocytes cultured in culture medium only, while the open boxes represent counts per minute for splenocytes cultured in the presence of TT at 0.1 µg/ml. For Expt. 2 (C57BL/6) and 3 (BALB/c), mice were immunized on days 0, 7, and 14 with 50 µg of TT. Splenocytes from three or four mice were pooled per group. Bars represent the mean for each group; error bars indicate the SD.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Results from the present study indicate that IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß are able to serve as mucosal adjuvants when intranasally administered with soluble protein Ags. IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were as effective as CT for the induction of Ag-specific serum IgG, vaginal IgA, as well as in vivo and in vitro cell-mediated immune responses. Although numerous reports have indicated that IL-1 is able to serve as an adjuvant for the induction of systemic Ag-specific immune responses (45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51), this is the first report demonstrating mucosal adjuvant activity for IL-1 when intranasally administered with soluble protein Ags.

A number of observations support the hypothesis that the production and release of IL-1 by CT-stimulated mucosal epithelial cells are critically involved in the mucosal adjuvant activity of CT. CT and the related LT are heterohexameric proteins with a m.w. of approximately 85,000 (52). The toxin is composed of one CT-A subunit noncovalently associated with five CT-B subunits. CT-B is responsible for binding to its receptor, ganglioside GM1, while the CT-A subunit possesses the toxic ADP-ribosyltransferase activity (52). Our hypothesis for CT-induced, IL-1-mediated mucosal adjuvant activity is as follows. After mucosal administration as an adjuvant, CT binds to its specific receptor on the surface of mucosal epithelial cells. Indeed, orally administered LT-B (similar to CT-B) bound to the brush border of villous enterocytes as well as epithelial cells overlying the Peyer’s patches (53). After binding to GM1, CT induces the production and/or secretion of IL-1 from mucosal epithelial cells (54). CT-induced IL-1 binds to type I IL-1R on mucosal epithelial cells (55, 56) and stimulates the production of more IL-1 as well as other cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TGF-ß) that affect both mucosal epithelial cells and other cell types (fibroblasts, macrophages, dendritic cells) and enhance the induction of mucosal and systemic immune responses. IL-1 stimulation down-regulates type I IL-1R expression on mucosal epithelial cells (57) and therefore limits the proinflammatory action of IL-1 induced by mucosal administration of CT. Indeed, mucosal adjuvant activity was observed when CT was coadministered with specific Ag, but not when it was administered 24 h before or after Ag dosing (58).

IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß are proinflammatory cytokines produced by many cell types including macrophages, PBMC, fibroblasts, and intestinal epithelial cell lines (36, 54, 59, 60, 61, 62). IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß use the same cell surface receptors, type I and type II, although only the type I IL-1R transduces a signal in response to ligation of the receptor with IL-1 (59, 63, 64). IL-1 induces the gene expression of itself as well as a large number of other proteins, including IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-12, TGF-ß3, TNF-{alpha}, TNF-ß, GM-CSF, G-CSF, M-CSF, and the IL-2R (59, 61). Because of its ability to induce the production of cytokines involved in the induction of immune responses, the potential of IL-1 as a vaccine adjuvant is apparent.

IL-1 has been extensively studied in humans and has been found to be extremely toxic after i.v. administration (61, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70). With both IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß, the predominant side effects observed were fever, chills, hypotension, and nausea. In these human studies, IL-1 was administered by the i.v. route and was administered daily for 4–14 days. In published murine studies, systemic administration of IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß also exhibited adverse side effects, such as fever and weight loss (71, 72, 73). The use of other cytokines as systemically administered adjuvants has also been reported to have adverse side effects in murine models. For example, i.p. injection of IL-12 and IL-18 was lethal when tested as an anti-tumor therapy at the doses of 0.01 and 1.0 µg, respectively, although a protective, nonlethal effect was observed at doses of 0.01 and 0.2 µg, respectively (74). In the present murine study, noticeable side effects were not observed after nasal administration of IL-1{alpha} or IL-1ß (i.e., no cytokine-induced mortality, no obvious weight loss or abnormal behavior). Additionally, IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were administered locally and were effective adjuvants when administered at weekly (Expt. 2 and 3) or biweekly intervals (Expt. 1). In some cases, IL-1 was an effective adjuvant when administered with only the first immunization in a series of immunizations. Because IL-1 stimulation of mucosal epithelial cells down-regulates expression of the type I IL-1R, the inflammatory activity of IL-1 used as a mucosal adjuvant may be minimized (57). Additional studies to carefully monitor the effects of nasally administered IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß on body temperature, body weight, and histology of the upper respiratory tract are currently being performed in our laboratory.

IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß may be superior to CT and related molecules as mucosal adjuvants because they are self proteins. Although CT is a potent mucosal adjuvant, the fact that it is very immunogenic in addition to being toxic may diminish its effectiveness when repeatedly used as a mucosal adjuvant. Indeed, pre-existing immunity to CT reduces its effectiveness as a mucosal adjuvant (31, 32). Despite having reduced toxicity in the presence of adjuvant activity, mutant CT molecules maintain their immunogenicity, which may reduce their effectiveness when repeatedly used as mucosal adjuvants in humans (23, 29, 30). In contrast to CT, IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß are self proteins and therefore nonimmunogenic. This quality may allow IL-1{alpha} or IL-1ß to be repeatedly used as an effective mucosal adjuvant. Because human IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß were used in the present study and are expected to be immunogenic in mice, it is impossible to determine what effect, if any, host immunity to the mucosal adjuvants (CT, IL-1{alpha}, IL-1ß) had on the induction of systemic and mucosal immune responses in this study. Additional studies are being performed with CT and recombinant murine IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß (expected to be nonimmunogenic in mice) to determine whether the repeated use of host proteins (i.e., IL-1) is superior to the use of foreign proteins as mucosal adjuvants.

The development of safe and effective mucosal adjuvants is critical to the development of mucosal vaccines for use in humans. Of particular interest to our laboratory is the development of vaccines that induce mucosal anti-HIV humoral and cell-mediated immune responses (10, 11, 14). The results from the present study suggest that 1) IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß are effective mucosal adjuvants for the induction of systemic and mucosal immune responses and 2) cytokines are biologically active when intranasally administered. The use of recombinant cytokines as mucosal adjuvants may prove useful for the induction of systemic and mucosal anti-HIV immune responses in humans. Studies are being performed to evaluate the use of IL-1{alpha} and IL-1ß as vaccine adjuvants when intranasally administered with HIV peptide and protein immunogens.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Neil Sparks for expert laboratory assistance and critical review of the manuscript; Drs. Francis Ennis, Jerry R. McGhee, Alice Pilgrim, and Curtis Bradney for critical review of the manuscript; and Wyeth-Lederle Vaccines and Pediatrics for their kind donation of TT.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants 5UO1AI35351-04 and 2P30AI28662, Department of Defense Grant DAMD17-94-J-4467, and a grant from the Durham, NC, Veterans Affairs Research Center on AIDS and HIV Infection. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Herman F. Staats, Box 3307, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CT, cholera toxin; PT, pertussis toxin; LT, heat-labile toxin; TT, tetanus toxoid; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity. Back

Received for publication November 2, 1998. Accepted for publication February 26, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ogra, P. L.. 1996. Mucosal immunoprophylaxis: an introductory overview. H. Kiyono, and P. L. Ogra, and J. R. McGhee, eds. Mucosal Vaccines 3. Academic Press, San Diego.
  2. Mowat, A. M.. 1994. Oral tolerance and regulation of immunity to dietary antigens. P. L. Ogra, and M. E. Lamm, and J. R. McGhee, and J. Mestecky, and W. Strober, and J. Bienenstock, eds. Handbook of Mucosal Immunology 185. Academic Press, San Diego.
  3. Husby, S., J. Mestecky, Z. Moldoveanu, S. Holland, C. O. Elson. 1994. Oral tolerance in humans. T cell but not B cell tolerance after antigen feeding. J. Immunol. 152:4663.[Abstract]
  4. Staines, N. A., N. Harper, F. J. Ward, V. Malmstrom, R. Holmdahl, S. Bansal. 1996. Mucosal tolerance and suppression of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) induced by nasal administration of synthetic peptide 184–198 of bovine type II collagen (CII) expressing a dominant T cell epitope. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 103:368.[Medline]
  5. Prakken, B. J., R. van der Zee, S. M. Anderton, P. J. S. van Kooten, W. Kuis, W. V. Eden. 1997. Peptide-induced nasal tolerance for a mycobacterial heat shock protein 60 T cell epitope in rats suppresses both adjuvant arthritis and nonmicrobially induced experimental arthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:3284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hoyne, G. F., R. E. O’Hehir, D. C. Wraith, W. R. Thomas, J. R. Lamb. 1993. Inhibition of T cell and antibody responses to house dust mite allergen by inhalation of the dominant T cell epitope in naive and sensitized mice. J. Exp. Med. 178:1783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Zhu, J., G. M. Deng, M. Levi, B. Wahren, A. Diab, P. H. Vandermeide, H. Link. 1998. Prevention of experimental autoimmune neuritis by nasal administration of P2 protein peptide 57–81. J. Neurol. Exp. Neurol. 57:291.
  8. Xiao, B. G., H. Link. 1997. Mucosal tolerance: a two-edged sword to prevent and treat autoimmune diseases. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 85:119.[Medline]
  9. Xu-Amano, J., H. Kiyono, R. J. Jackson, H. F. Staats, K. Fujihashi, P. D. Burrows, C. O. Elson, S. Pillai, J. R. McGhee. 1993. Helper T cell subsets for immunoglobulin A responses: oral immunization with tetanus toxoid and cholera toxin as adjuvant selectively induces Th2 cells in mucosa associated tissues. J. Exp. Med. 178:1309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Staats, H. F., W. G. Nichols, T. J. Palker. 1996. Mucosal immunity to HIV-1: systemic and vaginal antibody responses after intranasal immunization with the HIV-1 C4/V3 peptide T1SP10 MN(A). J. Immunol. 157:462.[Abstract]
  11. Staats, H. F., S. P. Montgomery, T. J. Palker. 1997. Intranasal immunization is superior to vaginal, gastric, or rectal immunization for the induction of systemic and mucosal anti-Hiv antibody responses. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 13:945.[Medline]
  12. Wilson, A. D., A. Robinson, L. Irons, C. R. Stokes. 1993. Adjuvant action of cholera toxin and pertussis toxin in the induction of IgA antibody response to orally administered antigen. Vaccine 11:113.[Medline]
  13. Elson, C. O., M. T. Dertzbaugh. 1994. Mucosal adjuvants. P. L. Ogra, and M. E. Lamm, and J. R. McGhee, and J. Mestecky, and W. Strober, and J. Bienenstock, eds. Handbook of Mucosal Immunology 391. Academic Press, San Diego.
  14. Porgador, A., H. F. Staats, B. Faiola, E. Gilboa, T. J. Palker. 1997. Intranasal immunization with CTL epitope peptides from HIV-1 or ovalbumin and the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin induces peptide-specific CTLs and protection against tumor development in vivo. J. Immunol. 158:834.[Abstract]
  15. O’Hagan, D. T.. 1997. Recent advances in vaccine adjuvants for systemic and mucosal adjuvants. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 49:1.[Medline]
  16. Elson, C. O., W. Ealding. 1984. Generalized systemic and mucosal immunity in mice after mucosal stimulation with cholera toxin. J. Immunol. 132:2736.[Abstract]
  17. Elson, C. O., W. Ealding. 1984. Cholera toxin feeding did not induce oral tolerance in mice and abrogated oral tolerance to an unrelated protein antigen. J. Immunol. 133:2892.[Abstract]
  18. Elson, C. O., S. Woogen, M. Gaspari, W. Ealding. 1987. Induction of secretory IgA responses to protein antigens. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 216B:877.
  19. Elson, C. O.. 1996. Cholera toxin as a mucosal adjuvant. H. Kiyono, and P. L. Ogra, and J. R. McGhee, eds. Mucosal Vaccines 59. Academic Press, New York.
  20. Levine, M. M., J. B. Kaper, R. E. Black, M. L. Clements. 1983. New knowledge on pathogenesis of bacterial enteric infections as applied to vaccine development. Microbiol. Rev. 47:510.[Free Full Text]
  21. Snider, D. P., J. S. Marshall, M. H. Perdue, H. Liang. 1994. Production of IgE antibody and allergic sensitization of intestinal and peripheral tissues after oral immunization with protein Ag and cholera toxin. J. Immunol. 153:647.[Abstract]
  22. Marinaro, M., H. F. Staats, T. Hiroi, R. J. Jackson, M. Coste, P. N. Boyaka, N. Okahashi, M. Yamamoto, H. Kiyono, H. Bluethmann, et al 1995. Mucosal adjuvant effect of cholera toxin in mice results from induction of T helper 2 (Th2) cells and IL-4. J. Immunol. 155:4621.[Abstract]
  23. Douce, G., M. Fontana, M. Pizza, R. Rappuoli, G. Dougan. 1997. Intranasal immunogenicity and adjuvanticity of site-directed mutant derivatives of cholera toxin. Infect. Immun. 65:2821.[Abstract]
  24. Yamamoto, S., Y. Takeda, M. Yamamoto, H. Kurazono, K. Imaoka, M. Yamamoto, K. Fujihashi, M. Noda, H. Kiyono, J. R. McGhee. 1997. Mutants in the ADP-ribosyltransferase cleft of cholera toxin lack diarrheagenicity but retain adjuvanticity. J. Exp. Med. 185:1203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Yamamoto, S., H. Kiyono, M. Yamamoto, K. Imaoka, M. Yamamoto, K. Fujihashi, F. W. Vanginkel, M. Noda, Y. Takeda, J. R. McGhee. 1997. A nontoxic mutant of cholera toxin elicits Th2-type responses for enhanced mucosal immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:5267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Roberts, M., A. Bacon, R. Rappuoli, M. Pizza, I. Cropley, G. Douce, G. Dougan, M. Marinaro, J. McGhee, S. Chatfield. 1995. Jun. A mutant pertussis toxin molecule that lacks ADP-ribosyltransferase activity, PT-9K/129G, is an effective mucosal adjuvant for intranasally delivered proteins. Infect. Immun. 63:2100.[Abstract]
  27. Di Tommaso, A., G. Saletti, M. Pizza, R. Rappuoli, G. Dougan, S. Abrignani, G. Douce, M. T. De Magistris. 1996. Induction of antigen-specific antibodies in vaginal secretions by using a nontoxic mutant of heat-labile enterotoxin as a mucosal adjuvant. Infect. Immun. 64:974.[Abstract]
  28. Dickinson, B. L., J. D. Clements. 1995. Dissociation of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin adjuvanticity from ADP-ribosyltransferase activity. Infect. Immun. 63:1617.[Abstract]
  29. Fontana, M. R., R. Manetti, V. Ciannelli, C. Magagnoli, A. Marchini, R. Olivieri, M. Domenighini, R. Rappuoli, M. Pizza. 1995. Construction of nontoxic derivatives of cholera toxin and characterization of the immunological response against the A subunit. Infect. Immun. 63:2356.[Abstract]
  30. de Haan, L., W. R. Verweij, I. K. Feil, T. H. Lijnema, W. G. J. Hol, E. Agsteribbe, J. Wilschut. 1996. Mutants of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin with reduced ADP-ribosylation activity or no activity retain the immunogenic properties of the native holotoxin. Infect. Immun. 64:5413.[Abstract]
  31. Lycke, N., U. Karlsson, A. Sjolander, K. E. Magnusson. 1991. The adjuvant action of cholera toxin is associated with an increased intestinal permeability for luminal antigens. Scand. J. Immunol. 33:691.[Medline]
  32. Wu, H. Y., M. W. Russell. 1994. Comparison of systemic and mucosal priming for mucosal immune responses to a bacterial protein antigen given with or coupled to cholera toxin (CT) B subunit, and effects of pre-existing anti-CT immunity. Vaccine 12:215.[Medline]
  33. Chen, K.-S., W. Strober. 1990. Cholera holotoxin and its B subunit enhance Peyer’s patch B cell responses induced by orally administered influenza virus: disproportionate cholera toxin enhancement of the IgA B cell response. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:433.[Medline]
  34. Hornquist, E., N. Lycke. 1993. Cholera toxin adjuvant greatly promotes antigen priming of T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:2136.[Medline]
  35. Cong, Y., C. T. Weaver, C. O. Elson. 1997. The mucosal adjuvanticity of cholera toxin involves enhancement of costimulatory activity by selective up-regulation of B7.2 expression. J. Immunol. 159:5301.[Abstract]
  36. Bromander, A., J. Holmgren, N. Lycke. 1991. Cholera toxin stimulates IL-1 production and enhances antigen presentation by macrophages in vitro. J. Immunol. 146:2908.[Abstract]
  37. Kim, P.-H., L. Eckmann, W. J. Lee, W. Han, M. F. Kagnoff. 1998. Cholera toxin and cholera toxin B subunit induce IgA switching through the action of TGF-ß1. J. Immunol. 160:1198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. McGee, D. W., K. W. Beagley, W. K. Aicher, J. R. McGhee. 1992. Transforming growth factor-ß enhances interleukin-6 secretion by intestinal epithelial cells. Immunology 77:7.[Medline]
  39. McGee, D. W., K. W. Beagley, W. K. Aicher, J. R. McGhee. 1993. Transforming growth factor-ß and IL-1ß act in synergy to enhance IL-6 secretion by the intestinal epithelial cell line, IEC-6. J. Immunol. 151:970.[Abstract]
  40. McGee, D. W., T. Bamberg, S. J. Vitkus, J. R. McGhee. 1995. A synergistic relationship between TNF-{alpha}, IL-1ß, and TGF-ß1 on IL-6 secretion by the IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cell line. Immunology 86:6.[Medline]
  41. Mascarenhas, J. O., M. E. Goodrich, H. Eichelberger, D. W. McGee. 1996. Polarized secretion of IL-6 by IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells: differential effects of IL-1ß and TNF-{alpha}. Immunol. Invest. 25:333.[Medline]
  42. Parikh, A. A., A. L. Salzman, C. D. Kane, J. E. Fischer, P. O. Hasselgren. 1997. IL-6 production in human intestinal epithelial cells following stimulation with IL-1ß is associated with activation of the transcription factor NF-{kappa}B. J. Surg. Res. 69:139.[Medline]
  43. Parikh, A. A., A. L. Salzman, J. E. Fischer, C. Szabo, P. O. Hasselgren. 1997. Interleukin-1ß and interferon-{gamma} regulate interleukin-6 production in cultured human intestinal epithelial cells. Shock 8:249.[Medline]
  44. Eckmann, L., H. C. Jung, C. Schurer-Maly, A. Panja, E. Morzycka-Wroblewska, M. F. Kagnoff. 1993. Differential cytokine expression by human intestinal epithelial cell lines: regulated expression of interleukin 8. Gastroenterology 105:1689.[Medline]
  45. Lin, R., P. E. Tarr, T. C. Jones. 1995. Present status of the use of cytokines as adjuvants with vaccines to protect against infectious diseases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21:1439.[Medline]
  46. Hakim, I., S. Levy, R. Levy. 1996. A nine-amino acid peptide from IL-1-ß augments antitumor immune responses induced by protein and DNA vaccines. J. Immunol. 157:5503.[Abstract]
  47. Staruch, M. J., D. D. Wood. 1983. The adjuvanticity of interleukin 1 in vivo. J. Immunol. 130:2191.[Abstract]
  48. Nencioni, L., L. Villa, A. Tagliabue, G. Antoni, R. Presentini, F. Perin, S. Silvestri, D. Boraschi. 1987. In vivo immunostimulating activity of the 163–171 peptide of human IL-1ß. J. Immunol. 139:800.[Abstract]
  49. Boraschi, D., L. Nencioni, L. Villa, S. Censini, P. Bossu, P. Ghiara, R. Presentini, F. Perin, D. Frasca, G. Doria, et al 1988. In vivo stimulation and restoration of the immune response by the noninflammatory fragment of 1633–171 of human interleukin 1ß. J. Exp. Med. 168:675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Tagliabue, A., D. Boraschi. 1993. Cytokine as vaccine adjuvants: interleukin 1 and its synthetic peptide 163–171. Vaccine 11:594.[Medline]
  51. Lofthouse, S. A., A. E. Andrews, G. J. Barcham, A. D. Nash. 1995. Parameters related to the application of recombinant ovine interleukin-1ß as an adjuvant. Vaccine 13:1277.[Medline]
  52. Spangler, B. D.. 1992. Structure and function of cholera toxin and the related Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin. Microbiol. Rev. 56:622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Lindner, J., A. F. Geczy, G. J. Russell-Jones. 1994. Identification of the site of uptake of the E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin, LTB. Scand. J. Immunol. 40:564.
  54. Bromander, A. K., M. Kjerrulf, J. Holmgren, N. Lycke. 1993. Cholera toxin enhances alloantigen presentation by cultured intestinal epithelial cells. Scand. J. Immunol. 37:452.[Medline]
  55. Sutherland, D. B., G. W. Varilek, G. A. Neil. 1994. Identification and characterization of the rat intestinal epithelial cell (IEC-18) interleukin-1 receptor. Am. J. Physiol. 266:C1198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Varilek, G. W., G. A. Neil, W. P. Bishop. 1994. Caco-2 cells express type I interleukin-1 receptors: ligand binding enhances proliferation. Am. J. Physiol. 267:G1101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. McGee, D. W., S. J. D. Vitkus, P. Lee. 1996. The effect of cytokine stimulation on IL-1 receptor mRNA expression by intestinal epithelial cells. Cell. Immunol. 168:276.[Medline]
  58. Lycke, N., J. Holmgren. 1986. Strong adjuvant properties of cholera toxin on gut mucosal immune responses to orally presented antigens. Immunology 59:301.[Medline]
  59. Dinarello, C. A.. 1996. Biologic basis for interleukin-1 in disease. Blood 87:2095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Dinarello, C. A.. 1994. The interleukin-1 family: 10 years of discovery. FASEB J. 8:1314.[Abstract]
  61. Dinarello, C. A.. 1992. The biology of interleukin-1. Chem. Immunol. 51:1.[Medline]
  62. Krakauer, T.. 1996. Evidence for protein kinase C pathway in the response of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells to cholera toxin. Cell. Immunol. 172:224.[Medline]
  63. O’Neill, L. A. J.. 1995. Towards an understanding of the signal transduction pathways for interleukin 1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1266:31.[Medline]
  64. Bankers-Fulbright, J. L., K. R. Kalli, D. J. McKean. 1996. Interleukin-1 signal transduction. Life Sci. 59:61.[Medline]
  65. Rinehart, J., E. Hersh, B. Issell, P. Triozzi, W. Buhles, J. Neidhart. 1997. Phase 1 trial of recombinant human interleukin-1ß (rhIL-1ß), carboplatin, and etoposide in patients with solid cancers: Southwest Oncology Group Study 8940. Cancer Invest. 15:403.[Medline]
  66. Verschraegen, C. F., A. P. Kudelka, W. Termrungruanglert, C. G. de Leon, C. L. Edwards, R. S. Freedman, J. J. Kavanagh, S. Vadhan-Raj. 1996. Effects of interleukin-1{alpha} on ovarian carcinoma in patients with recurrent disease. Eur. J. Cancer 32A:1609.
  67. Janik, J. E., L. L. Miller, D. L. Longo, G. C. Powers, W. J. Urba, W. C. Kopp, B. L. Gause, B. D. Curti, R. G. Fenton, J. J. Oppenheim, et al 1996. Phase II trial of interleukin 1{alpha} and indomethacin in treatment of metastatic melanoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 88:44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Weisdorf, D., E. Katsanis, C. Verfaillie, N. K. C. Ramsay, R. Haake, L. Garrison, B. R. Blazar. 1994. Interleukin-1{alpha} administered after autologous transplantation: a phase I/II clinical trial. Blood 84:2044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Nemunaitis, J., F. R. Appelbaum, K. Lilleby, W. C. Buhles, C. Rosenfeld, Z. R. Zeigler, R. K. Shadduck, J. W. Singer, W. Meyer, C. D. Buckner. 1994. Phase I study of recombinant interleukin-1ß in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplant for acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood 83:3473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Veltri, S., Jr J. W. Smith. 1996. Interleukin 1 trials in cancer patients: a review of the toxicity, antitumor and hematopoietic effects. Stem Cells 14:164.[Medline]
  71. Zetterstrom, M., J. Lundkvist, D. Malinowsky, G. Eriksson, T. Bartfai. 1998. Interleukin-1-mediated febrile responses in mice and interleukin-1ß activation of NF{kappa}B in mouse primary astrocytes, involves the interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein. Eur. Cytokine Network 9:131.[Medline]
  72. Swiergiel, A. H., G. N. Smagin, A. J. Dunn. 1997. Influenza virus infection of mice induces anorexia: comparison with endotoxin and interleukin-1 and the effects of indomethacin. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 57:389.[Medline]
  73. Zheng, H., D. Fletcher, W. Kozak, M. Jiang, K. J. Hofmann, C. A. Conn, D. Soszynski, C. Grabiec, M. E. Trumbauer, A. Shaw, et al 1995. Resistance to fever induction and impaired acute-phase response in interleukin-1ß-deficient mice. Immunity 3:9.[Medline]
  74. Osaki, T., J.-M. Peron, Q. Cai, H. Okamura, P. D. Robbins, M. Kurimoto, M. T. Lotze, H. Tahara. 1998. IFN-{gamma}-inducing factor/IL-18 administration mediates IFN-{gamma}- and IL-12-independent antitumor effects. J. Immunol. 160:1742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. McGee, D. W., C. O. Elson, J. R. McGhee. 1993. Enhancing effect of cholera toxin on interleukin-6 secretion by IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells: mode of action and augmenting effect of inflammatory cytokines. Infect. Immun. 61:4637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Panja, A., E. Siden, L. Mayer. 1995. Synthesis and regulation of accessory/proinflammatory cytokines by intestinal epithelial cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 100:298.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
M Baranska, L Van Amelsvoort, S Birindelli, S Fustinoni, E Corsini, J Liesivuori, and H Van Loveren
Association of pesticide exposure, vaccination response, and interleukin-1 gene polymorphisms
Human and Experimental Toxicology, September 1, 2008; 27(9): 709 - 713.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
S. Lata and G.P.S. Raghava
CytoPred: a server for prediction and classification of cytokines
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., April 1, 2008; 21(4): 279 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
C.-F. Flach, F. Qadri, T. R. Bhuiyan, N. H. Alam, E. Jennische, I. Lonnroth, and J. Holmgren
Broad Up-Regulation of Innate Defense Factors during Acute Cholera
Infect. Immun., May 1, 2007; 75(5): 2343 - 2350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Duverger, R. J. Jackson, F. W. van Ginkel, R. Fischer, A. Tafaro, S. H. Leppla, K. Fujihashi, H. Kiyono, J. R. McGhee, and P. N. Boyaka
Bacillus anthracis Edema Toxin Acts as an Adjuvant for Mucosal Immune Responses to Nasally Administered Vaccine Antigens
J. Immunol., February 1, 2006; 176(3): 1776 - 1783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Kobayashi, T. Kohda, K. Kataoka, H. Ihara, S. Kozaki, D. W. Pascual, H. F. Staats, H. Kiyono, J. R. McGhee, and K. Fujihashi
A Novel Neurotoxoid Vaccine Prevents Mucosal Botulism
J. Immunol., February 15, 2005; 174(4): 2190 - 2195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. W. Peacock, S. K. Nordone, S. S. Jackson, H.-X. Liao, N. L. Letvin, A. G. Yafal, L. Gritz, G. P. Mazzara, B. F. Haynes, and H. F. Staats
Gender Differences in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Specific CD8 Responses in the Reproductive Tract and Colon following Nasal Peptide Priming and Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Boosting
J. Virol., December 1, 2004; 78(23): 13163 - 13172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
G. Hajishengallis, H. Nawar, R. I. Tapping, M. W. Russell, and T. D. Connell
The Type II Heat-Labile Enterotoxins LT-IIa and LT-IIb and Their Respective B Pentamers Differentially Induce and Regulate Cytokine Production in Human Monocytic Cells
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2004; 72(11): 6351 - 6358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. M. Eriksson, K. M. Schon, and N. Y. Lycke
The Cholera Toxin-Derived CTA1-DD Vaccine Adjuvant Administered Intranasally Does Not Cause Inflammation or Accumulate in the Nervous Tissues
J. Immunol., September 1, 2004; 173(5): 3310 - 3319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. M. Gherardi, E. Perez-Jimenez, J. L. Najera, and M. Esteban
Induction of HIV Immunity in the Genital Tract After Intranasal Delivery of a MVA Vector: Enhanced Immunogenicity After DNA Prime-Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Boost Immunization Schedule
J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 6209 - 6220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
K. Eriksson, M. Fredriksson, I. Nordstrom, and J. Holmgren
Cholera Toxin and Its B Subunit Promote Dendritic Cell Vaccination with Different Influences on Th1 and Th2 Development
Infect. Immun., April 1, 2003; 71(4): 1740 - 1747.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. Cauci, S. Guaschino, D. de Aloysio, S. Driussi, D. De Santo, P. Penacchioni, and F. Quadrifoglio
Interrelationships of interleukin-8 with interleukin-1{beta} and neutrophils in vaginal fluid of healthy and bacterial vaginosis positive women
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 9(1): 53 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. P. Bradney, G. D. Sempowski, H.-X. Liao, B. F. Haynes, and H. F. Staats
Cytokines as Adjuvants for the Induction of Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Peptide Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA Antibodies in Serum and Mucosal Secretions after Nasal Immunization
J. Virol., January 15, 2002; 76(2): 517 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. F. Staats, C. P. Bradney, W. M. Gwinn, S. S. Jackson, G. D. Sempowski, H.-X. Liao, N. L. Letvin, and B. F. Haynes
Cytokine Requirements for Induction of Systemic and Mucosal CTL After Nasal Immunization
J. Immunol., November 1, 2001; 167(9): 5386 - 5394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. N. Shi, H. Y. Liu, and C. Nagler-Anderson
Enteric Infection Acts as an Adjuvant for the Response to a Model Food Antigen
J. Immunol., December 1, 2000; 165(11): 6174 - 6182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. S. Wild, A. Sigounas, N. Sur, M. S. Siddiqui, R. Alam, M. Kurimoto, and S. Sur
IFN-{gamma}-Inducing Factor (IL-18) Increases Allergic Sensitization, Serum IgE, Th2 Cytokines, and Airway Eosinophilia in a Mouse Model of Allergic Asthma
J. Immunol., March 1, 2000; 164(5): 2701 - 2710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Williamson, G. M. Westrich, and J. L. Viney
Modulating Dendritic Cells to Optimize Mucosal Immunization Protocols
J. Immunol., October 1, 1999; 163(7): 3668 - 3675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staats, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ennis, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Staats, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ennis, F. A., Jr.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS