|
|
||||||||
B in FGF Receptor-Bearing Jurkat T Cells1
Departments of Medicine and Microbiology/Immunology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B, a family of transcription
factors known to regulate IL-2 and other activation-inducible proteins.
FGF-1 alone induces modest nuclear translocation of
B-binding
proteins, and this translocation is enhanced by the combination of
anti-CD3 and FGF-1. This NF-
B binding complex is composed of
transcriptionally active p65(RelA)/p50 heterodimers and results
primarily from the targeted degradation of I
B-
, an inhibitor that
sequesters Rel/
B in the cytoplasm. These data are the first to show
a connection between FGF-1 signaling and NF-
B activation outside of
embryonic development. The signaling events that link FGF receptor-1
engagement and NF-
B activation in Jurkat are probably distinct from
the CD28 costimulation pathway, since FGF-1-induced Rel/
B binding
proteins do not contain significant levels of c-Rel and are not
identical with the CD28 response complex. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
when stimulated by the
combination of FGF and TCR engagement by superantigen, while neither
stimulus alone induced cytokine production. Their data thus suggested
that FGF and other peptide growth hormones provided a second or
costimulatory signal required for cytokine production. More recent
experiments show that a subset of CD4+ T cells expresses
FGF receptor-1 (FGFR-1) (12, 13), a high affinity receptor tyrosine
kinase that mediates FGF signaling in many other cell types (reviewed
in 14). For CD4+ T cells that express FGFR-1, FGF-1
can provide the costimulatory signal required for IL-2 production in
conjunction with anti-CD3 (12, 13). FGF-1 alone, however, does not
induce IL-2 production, and in contrast to other cell types that
express FGFR-1, FGF-1 alone is unable to induce T cell proliferation.
Whether this reflects the dependence of T cells upon IL-2 for
proliferation or differences in FGFR-1 signaling pathways in T cells vs
other cell types is unknown.
FGFR signaling in other cell types induces receptor oligomerization and
autophosphorylation with resultant tyrosine phosphorylation of
phospholipase C
and activation of Ras/MAPK/extracellular
signal-related kinase (ERK) (14, 15, 16), which are also activated by the
TCR pathway. IL-2 production resulting from the combination of TCR and
FGF-1 signaling, therefore, presumably reflects an integration of
signals from these two pathways and their resultant transcription
factor activation. Among the transcription factors that are activated
by signaling through FGFR-1 in nonlymphoid cells are AP-1 and cAMP
response element binding protein/activating transcription factor-2
(ATF-2) (17, 18), and most recently members of the FGF family were
shown, for the first time, to induce NF-
B/Rel transcription factors
in the developing limb bud (19, 20).
Engagement of CD28 by its receptor ligands on APCs is to date the
predominant interaction between T cell and APC surface molecules that
provide costimulation for IL-2 production, thus inducing T cell
expansion and preventing anergy or apoptosis. Activation of NF-
B/Rel
factors is a major target of the costimulatory activity of the CD28
pathway (21, 22, 23, 24). Indirect evidence suggests that FGF-1 may also have
costimulatory function in vivo, especially at sights such as the
synovium in active RA and the parenchyma of solid organ allografts,
where FGF-1 production is excessive (5, 7, 8, 9, 10). Patients with RA and
cardiac transplant recipients have 5- to 10-fold increases in the
precursor frequency of FGF-responsive T cells in peripheral blood
compared with normal subjects, and changes in the frequency of these
cells over time are correlated with disease activity in RA (5, 12, 13).
Enrichment of FGFR-1+ CD4+ T cells in RA
synovium compared with peripheral blood suggests that local FGF-1 may
contribute to T cell activation, differentiation, or survival within
inflammatory sites.
To improve our understanding of the actions on T cells independent of
these complex inflammatory events, we initiated studies using a Jurkat
T cell line that expresses the signaling isoform of FGFR-1. Evidence
for activation of NF-
B/Rel transcription factors by FGFs expressed
in the developing limb and the parallels with CD28 costimulation in T
cells prompted us to investigate whether FGFR-1 signaling activates
NF-
B/Rel in Jurkat T cells. The results show that FGF-1 induces
enhanced degradation of cytoplasmic I
B-
and prolonged nuclear
translocation of transcriptionally active p50/RelA heterodimers. In
contrast to costimulation via CD28, FGF-induced Rel/
B complexes
contained low levels of c-Rel, and no binding to the CD28 response
element (CD28RE) was observed in nuclear extracts from cells stimulated
with FGF-1. The data demonstrate that some functions of FGF-1 outside
embryonic development are mediated by members of the Rel/NF-
B family
and that signals from a nonhemopoietic growth factor and the TCR
pathways may intersect. The implications for these findings in the
activation of nontransformed T cells is discussed.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Jurkat T cells expressing FGFR-1ß have been described previously (25). Briefly, they were produced by stable transfection of a plasmid containing FGFR-1ß cDNA driven by the CD2 promoter and locus control region. These cells (clone C2-14) express approximately 30,000 high affinity FGFR and were used for all the experiments described here. The cells were routinely maintained in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM L-glutamine, and 1 mg/ml G418. For T cell stimulations, cells were cultured in six-well flat-bottom plates coated with anti-CD3 (1 µg/ml mAb JE6, provided by Dr. Stanford Stewart, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN). Recombinant human FGF-1 or FGF-2 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) or anti-CD28 (mAb 9.3, 1/2,500, provided by Dr. Jeffrey Ledbetter, Bristol Myers Squibb, Seattle, WA) were included as indicated. All stimulations with FGF-1 or FGF-2 included heparin (20 U/ml). For determinations of IL-2 protein production, supernatants were harvested at 24 h and were assayed by ELISA (BioSource, Camarillo, CA) according to the manufacturers specifications.
Nuclear and cytoplasmic extract preparation
Nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extracts were prepared as previously described (26) from 107 T cells harvested at each time point. Cells were washed in 1.0 ml of ice-cold PBS, and cell pellets were lysed in 100 µl of lysis buffer (10 mM HEPES, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.4% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM PMSF) in the presence of protease inhibitors (antipain, aprotinin, leupeptin, bestatin, phosphoramidon, and soybean trypsin inhibitor, all 5 µg/ml, and pepstatin 0.5 µg/ml). Cells were incubated on ice for 5 min. The cell lysates were subsequently centrifuged for 60 s at 14,000 x g, and supernatants were collected for cytoplasmic protein analysis. The nuclear pellet from lysis was washed briefly in 100 µl of lysis buffer and then subjected to high salt extraction in 50 µl of nuclear buffer (0.4 M NaCl, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM PMSF, in the presence of protease inhibitors) at 4°C with extensive shaking for 15 min. Cellular debris from both cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts was removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 14,000 x g, and fractions were stored at -70°C until analyzed. Protein concentrations were determined by spectrophotometric assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturers specifications.
EMSA/supershift assays
For EMSA, 10 µg of nuclear protein was incubated with
32P-labeled duplex probe including 1) a palindromic NF-
B
site derived from the IL-2R-
promoter
(5'-CAACGGCAGGGGAATTCCCCTCTCCTT-3') (27), or 2) the CD28 response
element (CD28RE; 5'-GATCGTTTAAAGAAATTCCAAA-3') from the IL-2 promoter.
Incubations were performed in binding buffer (125 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM EDNA,
0.25 mM DTT, 0.25 mM PMSF, 0.5 mg/ml BSA, 1% Nonidet P-40, and 0.1
mg/ml double-stranded poly(dI-dC)) for 15 min at room temperature.
Approximately 100,000 cpm of radiolabeled probe was used per sample.
Resultant nucleoprotein complexes were separated on a 5% nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel in TBE buffer (90 mM Tris, 90 mM borate, 2.5 mM
EDTA) and visualized by autoradiography. For both probes, the
specificity of protein-oligonucleotide interactions was verified by
competition of radiolabeled probe with an excess of unlabeled
oligonucleotide. For supershift assays, DNA/protein complexes were
incubated with rabbit polyclonal antisera to members of the Rel/
B
family, including p65(RelA) (antiserum R567) (26), p50 (antiserum R393)
(28), or preimmune sera.
Western blot analysis
Nuclear protein extracts were prepared from stimulated Jurkat T
cells as detailed above. Nuclear proteins (60 µg) were separated by
10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene membranes, and blocked
with 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline/Tween. Proteins were
subsequently immunoblotted with polyclonal antiserum specific for c-Rel
(antiserum R453, 1/2000) (29). For Western blot analysis of cytosolic
I
B, cytoplasmic protein extracts were prepared from stimulated
Jurkat T cells as detailed above, except that T cells were stimulated
in the presence of cycloheximide (50 µg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to
block the NF-
B-induced resynthesis of I
B inhibitors (30, 31).
Cytoplasmic proteins (100 µg) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE,
transferred to polyvinylidene membranes, and blocked as detailed above.
Proteins were immunoblotted with polyclonal antiserum specific for
either I
B-
(antiserum R663, 1/2500) (26) or I
B-ß (antiserum
C-20, 1/200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Immunoreactive
proteins were detected with peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG
using an enhanced chemiluminescence assay (Amersham, Arlington Heights,
IL).
Jurkat transient transfections and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) assay
Jurkat C2-14 was transiently transfected by electroporation with
a vector containing a CAT reporter gene driven by the NF-
B sequence
from the HIV-1 promoter as previously described (32). Electroporation
conditions (250 V, 960 µF, time constant 34) were optimized to a
viable cell recovery of 50%. Cells were rested for 24 h in
RPMI/10% FCS, followed by stimulation for 24 h and assay for CAT
activity. CAT assays were performed on whole cell lysates by a
diffusion-based liquid scintillation method (33).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Optimal production of IL-2 by T cells is dependent upon signals
generated by TCR engagement and costimulatory signals provided by
additional cell surface receptors. To examine the costimulatory effects
of FGF-1, Jurkat T cells that express FGFR-1 were stimulated with
anti-CD3 alone, FGF-1 alone, or anti-CD3 plus FGF-1 (Fig. 1
). Unstimulated T cells and those
stimulated with anti-CD3 alone (zero FGF point on the anti-CD3
plus FGF curve) or FGF-1 alone produced little IL-2. However, the
combination of anti-CD3 with FGF-1 increased IL-2 production
approximately 7-fold over that with anti-CD3 alone. Similar results
were obtained with FGF-2 (Fig. 1
), consistent with the fact that FGFR-1
binds both these FGF family members with high affinity. Positive
control stimulations with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 resulted in
significant IL-2 production (mean, 1423 pg/ml; data not shown). These
data confirm previous findings that engagement of the TCR together with
stimulation by FGF-1 induces both IL-2 production and proliferation,
whereas FGF-1 alone is ineffective (12, 13).
|
B binding
proteins
Activation of T cells via the TCR together with costimulation via
CD28 result in nuclear translocation of Rel/NF-
B transcription
factors (23, 34). We therefore examined whether FGF-1 alone or in
combination with TCR engagement similarly activates NF-
B. Gel shifts
were performed using a palindromic
B sequence derived from the IL-2R
-chain enhancer as a probe and nuclear extracts from cells that were
either unstimulated or stimulated with FGF-1 alone (Fig. 2
A). Modest induction of
NF-
B binding activity was present by 30 min after addition of FGF-1
and remained detectable with relatively little change during 6 h
of culture in the presence of FGF-1. In contrast, stimulation with both
anti-CD3 and FGF-1 led to enhanced binding compared with either
stimulus alone, and binding activity increased substantially over time
up to 12 h in culture (Fig. 2
B). As a positive control
for NF-
B/Rel activation, we performed EMSA on T cells stimulated
with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 and detected a similar
B binding
complex (Fig. 2
B). Competition experiments with unlabeled
competitor probe confirmed the specificity of binding (data not shown).
To confirm binding by NF-
B family members, supershifts were
performed with antisera to p50 and p65 and with control nonimmune serum
on nuclear extracts from cells stimulated with anti-CD3 alone,
anti-CD3 plus FGF-1, and positive controls stimulated with
anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 (Fig. 2
C). The results
demonstrate the presence of p50 and p65 in all complexes binding to the
B sequence. The data thus indicate that stimulation by FGF-1 results
in nuclear translocation of NF-
B that is enhanced by the combination
of TCR and FGFR signaling.
|
As supershift assays using polyclonal antiserum directed against
c-Rel did not produce convincing mobility shifts (data not shown), we
performed Western blotting for c-Rel using nuclear extracts from Jurkat
T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 plus either FGF-1 or anti-CD28
(Fig. 3
). The results demonstrate no
appreciable increase in c-Rel nuclear translocation following
stimulation with FGF-1 alone or anti-CD3 alone and a very modest
increase in c-Rel following stimulation with anti-CD3 plus FGF-1.
In contrast, marked nuclear translocation of c-Rel was noted following
stimulation with anti-CD3 in combination with anti-CD28. These
data show that FGF-induced Rel/
B complexes differ from those
activated by anti-CD28 pathways, as FGF-induced complexes contain
little c-Rel.
|
Activation through CD28, but not other costimulators (23), results
in the formation of a nuclear CD28 response complex (CD28RC) that binds
to a sequence designated the CD28 response element (CD28RE) present in
several genes including the IL-2 promoter (23, 35, 36). Since FGF-1
costimulation enhances nuclear translocation of p50 and p65, which are
components of the CD28RC (23), we examined whether it also results in a
complex that binds the CD28RE. EMSA was performed with a probe for the
CD28RE sequence and nuclear extracts from cells stimulated with FGF-1
alone in combination with anti-CD3 or from controls stimulated with
anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 (Fig. 4
).
Nuclear extracts from controls stimulated with anti-CD3 plus
anti-CD28 showed the expected binding to the CD28RE probe, while
cells stimulated with FGF-1, anti-CD28 alone, anti-CD3 alone,
or anti-CD3 plus FGF-1 did not. These results indicate that
costimulation by FGF-1 does not activate formation of the protein
complex that binds this element of the IL-2 promoter and that signaling
pathways from CD28 and FGFR-1 are not identical.
|
B proteins activated by FGF-1 costimulation are
transcriptionally active
To confirm that the
B binding complex induced by FGF-1
costimulation was capable of activating transcription, we performed
transient transfections with an NF-
B-CAT reporter construct. As
shown in Fig. 5
, stimulation with either
anti-CD3 or FGF-1 alone resulted in only a 2-fold increase in CAT
activity above that in unstimulated cells. Costimulation with FGF-1 and
anti-CD3 resulted in an average 5-fold increase in CAT activity,
similar to the 7.4-fold increase seen with anti-CD3 plus
anti-CD28. The results demonstrate that both FGF-1 and CD28
costimulatory pathways induce Rel/
B protein complexes that are
transcriptionally active.
|
B-
for degradation
Rel/NF-
B proteins are retained in an inactive state in the
cytoplasm by inhibitors (I
B) that prevent their nuclear
translocation (30, 31, 37). Activating signals result in
phosphorylation of these inhibitors and their subsequent degradation
(30, 31). Costimulation via CD28 has been reported to induce
degradation of both I
B-
(38, 39) and I
B-ß (34). To determine
whether FGF-1 stimulation similarly results in degradation of I
B,
Western blots were performed for I
B-
and I
B-ß on cytoplasmic
extracts of cells stimulated with anti-CD3 alone or anti-CD3
plus FGF-1. Because active NF-
B induces synthesis of I
B-
protein (30), cycloheximide was added to cultures to prevent new
protein synthesis and therefore the resynthesis of I
B-
induced by
active NF-
B. The results are shown in Fig. 6
. Compared with stimulation with
anti-CD3 alone, costimulation with FGF-1 resulted in enhanced
degradation of I
B-
with earlier kinetics. Decreased levels of
I
B-
were apparent by 30 min of stimulation, and degradation was
virtually complete by 4 h (Fig. 6
). In contrast, no degradation of
I
B-ß was seen. Similar results were observed for degradation of
I
B-
following costimulation with anti-CD28. There was a
modest decrease in I
B-ß. These data on I
B-ß degradation
induced by CD28 stimulation are similar to those reported by Lai and
Tan (38) and recently by Kalli et al. (39), but differ from the
findings of Harhaj et al. (34). The differences may lie in the use of
PMA (34) rather than anti-CD3 in conjunction with anti-CD28.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, Grb2, and Sos (16). Recruitment
of such SH2 domain proteins then triggers the activation of
Ras-dependent signaling events and the induction of MAPK pathways (16, 41). It is not known whether autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues
outside the catalytic domain is required for FGFR-1 signaling, as
site-directed mutagenesis of these noncatalytic tyrosine residues does
not inhibit activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway or cell proliferation
(40). In addition, the data suggest that FGF downstream signaling
events are shared with cAMP pathways, as FGF/Ras-mediated gene
activation in neuroblastoma cells has been shown to induce
transcription of the ATF/AP-1 factors c-Jun and ATF-3, which, in turn,
bind to cAMP response element-2 (18). These data demonstrating
induction of Fos and Jun proteins are consistent with the observation
that FGF-2 induces the expression of c-Jun and c-Fos in NIH-3T3 cells
(17), and that the FGF-inducible response element from the syndecan
gene contains novel AP-1 binding motifs (41).
The data presented here are, to the best of our knowledge, the first
direct demonstration of Rel/
B activation following interaction of
FGF-1 with FGFR-1. Recent reports by two laboratories examining
expression of NF-
B in the mesoderm of developing chick limb bud have
demonstrated a relationship between other FGFs and activation of
NF-
B proteins. In both studies either exogenous FGF-8 (19) or FGF-4
(20) was capable of reconstituting c-Rel mesodermal expression and
normal limb formation following excision of the apical ectodermal
ridge, a known source of FGFs that regulate limb development (19, 20).
The induction of other Rel/
B proteins, such as p50 or p65, was not
addressed in these reports, and activation of an intermediary protein
remains a possibility. Nonetheless, taken together, the data
suggest that FGFRs in both Jurkat T cells and mesoderm directly
activate Rel/
B. It is not evident from the studies in chick limb
which FGFRs mediate c-Rel activation; however, previous investigations
have shown that functional FGFR-1 and FGFR-2 are required for normal
limb development in vertebrates (42, 43). In Jurkat cells, we were
unable to demonstrate substantial c-Rel activation by FGF-1 and FGFR-1.
The results may suggest that FGF family members and distinct FGFRs
differentially regulate NF-
B/Rel proteins. In addition,
nontransformed T cells that express FGFR-1, such as those in RA
synovium (5), may be regulated differently.
While the function of FGF-1 as a secondary signal for T cell activation
is analogous to costimulation through CD28 pathways, our data indicate
that these two pathways are distinct. The failure of FGF-1-induced
nuclear proteins to bind with high affinity to the CD28RE coupled with
the minimal c-Rel in these complexes indicate that the Rel/
B
complexes are not identical in FGF-1 and CD28 pathways. Recent data
show that while RelA (p65), NF-
B1 (p50), and c-Rel are all
components of the CD28RC, only RelA and c-Rel directly bind to and
trans-activate the CD28RE (22, 24). In addition, the
induction of c-Rel by CD28 appears to be a critical determinant of
CD28RE transcriptional activity, as overexpression of c-rel
augments the activity of a reporter gene under the control of the
CD28RE (23). In Jurkat T cells we have not been able to demonstrate the
presence of substantial c-Rel in FGF-1-induced complexes, and this lack
of c-Rel activation may provide one explanation for the relatively weak
transcriptional activity of FGF-1-induced complexes and their inability
to bind to the CD28RE. Finally, recent evidence suggests that CD28
costimulation and subsequent activation of the CD28RE requires binding
of factors unrelated to Rel/
B proteins, including the high mobility
group protein HMG I(Y) (44), and NF-MATp35 (45). Such proteins may not
be recruited in response to FGF-1 signaling in T cells. These events
may differ in other types of T cells, such that FGF-1 costimulation in
nontransformed T cells in vitro or its effects within inflammatory
sites may include c-Rel activation. Experiments are currently in
progress to determine these possibilities. Similarly, we have observed
that the combination of FGF-1 and anti-CD28 increases NF-
B
translocation in Jurkat without increasing IL-2 production (data not
shown). The outcome of these signals may also differ in nontransformed
T cells, and experiments to characterize these events are in progress.
Differential degradation of the NF-
B cytoplasmic inhibitors
I
B-
and I
B-ß was examined to determine how FGF-1 regulates
the induction of Rel/
B complexes. Emerging data suggest that control
of differential Rel/
B complex induction by various stimuli occurs at
the level of targeted degradation of either I
B-
or I
B-ß.
Degradation of I
B-
has been linked to the nuclear induction of
p50/p65 heterodimers, the classic NF-
B complexes induced by a broad
variety of stimuli, including mitogens (PMA) and various cytokines
(GM-CSF, TNF-
) (34). In contrast, targeted degradation of I
B-ß
is restricted to only a few stimulators, including LPS and the human T
cell leukemia virus-1 Tax protein (34). CD28 signaling targets both
and ß isoforms, as this pathway has been recently shown to prolong
both PMA- and anti-CD3-induced degradation of I
B-
and to
induce the degradation of I
B-ß, an event that is not targeted by
PMA activation alone (34, 38, 39). Our results show that FGF-1 targets
the degradation of I
B-
, as FGF-1 plus anti-CD3 enhances and
substantially prolongs the modest I
B-
degradation induced by
anti-CD3 alone. Little effect on I
B- ß degradation was
observed in our studies. This FGF-1 targeting of I
B-
is
consistent with the FGF-1 induction of Rel/
B complexes that
contain mostly p50 and p65, the heterodimer complex that is typically
induced with I
B-
degradation.
While we demonstrate activation of Rel/
B proteins following
FGF-1/FGFR-1 interaction, this could be a response unique to specific
combinations of FGFs/FGFRs rather than the FGF family as a whole.
Recent studies in NIH-3T3 cells suggest that an FGF-2-inducible
response element in the syndecan-1 promoter does not bind NF-
B (41).
In these studies in vivo footprinting revealed three motifs that bind
nuclear factors in response to FGF-2 activation. While two of these
motifs contained AP-1-like consensus sites, the remaining motif
contained no known consensus sequences. Binding competition experiments
with an array of unlabeled oligonucleotides in gel-shift experiments
did not reveal inhibition of any protein complexes by NF-
B
oligonucleotides, suggesting that Rel/
B proteins are not crucial for
the FGF-2-responsive expression of syndecan-1 (41). Thus, while NF-
B
is activated by FGF-1 in Jurkat T cells, it is likely that other
proteins play critical roles in the transcriptional regulation of
FGF-1-responsive elements in other types of cells. In addition, the
complex array of cytokines and growth factors found in inflammatory
sites where FGFR-1+ T cells accumulate may further alter
the transcriptional regulation of FGF-1 responses.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Victor M. Byrd, Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, T3219 MCN 21st Ave. and Garland, Nashville, TN 37232. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: FGF, fibroblast growth factor; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; FGFR-1, FGF receptor-1; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; CD28RE, CD28 response element; ATF-2, activating transcription factor-2; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; CD28RC, CD28 response complex. ![]()
Received for publication November 20, 1998. Accepted for publication March 1, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production. J. Immunol. 134:2824.[Medline]
B transcription factors during the outgrowth of the vertebrate limb. Nature 392:611.[Medline]
B activity results in disruption of the apical ectodermal ridge and aberrant limb morphogenesis. Nature 392:615.[Medline]
B family: c-Rel, p50, and p65. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:1696.
B by CD28 costimulation in human T lymphocytes. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 766:220.[Medline]
B
to multiple pathways for NF-
B activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2809.[Abstract]
B
requires site-specific ubiquitination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:11259.
B/MAD-3 masks the nuclear localization signal of NF-
B p65 and requires the transactivation domain to inhibit NF-
B p65 DNA binding. Mol. Biol. Cell 3:1339.[Abstract]
B-ß regulates its functional interaction with the c-rel proto-oncogene product. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5974.[Abstract]
B/I
B family: intimate tales of association and dissociation. Genes Dev. 9:2723.
B and I
B proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:649.[Medline]
B-ß which is associated with accelerated activation of various NF-
B/Rel heterodimers. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:6736.[Abstract]
B
and I
Bß. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5386.[Abstract]
B-
which can be prevented by the immunosuppressant rapamycin. J. Biol. Chem. 269:30077.
B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:3140.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. V. Gasparian, Y. J. Yao, D. Kowalczyk, L. A. Lyakh, A. Karseladze, T. J. Slaga, and I. V. Budunova The role of IKK in constitutive activation of NF-{kappa}B transcription factor in prostate carcinoma cells J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2002; 115(1): 141 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Reilly and P. A. Maher Importin {beta}-mediated Nuclear Import of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor: Role in Cell Proliferation J. Cell Biol., March 19, 2001; 152(6): 1307 - 1312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kubota, T. Kushikata, J. Fang, and J. M. Krueger Nuclear factor-kappa B inhibitor peptide inhibits spontaneous and interleukin-1beta -induced sleep Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): R404 - R413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |