The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lustgarten, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lustgarten, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, L. A.
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 162: 359-365.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

Redirecting Effector T Cells Through Their IL-2 Receptors1

Joseph Lustgarten*, James Marks{dagger} and Linda A. Sherman2,*

* Department of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037; and {dagger} Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Francisco CA 94110


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Fusion proteins constructed of a tumor-specific Ab joined to IL-2 (Ab-IL-2) have been used in the past to deliver cytokine directly to the site of tumor cells in vivo. These molecules mimic the activity of IL-2 and assist in activating and expanding antitumor effector cells. To enhance the cytolytic activity of CTL specific for peptide epitopes of the Her-2/neu tumor Ag presented by HLA-A*0201 molecules, a fusion protein was constructed consisting of a single chain Ab specific for Her-2/neu, linked to IL-2 (neu-Ab-IL-2). When added to a mixture of tumor cells and Her-2/neu-specific CTL, the protein was found to augment lysis of tumor cells. In addition, the hybrid molecule also promoted lysis of Her-2/neu expressing tumors by non-tumor-specific cloned T cell lines, including Th1 CD4 cells. Analysis of the mechanism of cytotoxicity revealed that the fusion protein mediates the formation of stable conjugates between T cells expressing IL-2R and tumor cells expressing Her-2/neu, resulting in lysis through the Fas-Fas ligand pathway. Lysis induction was independent of specific engagement by the TCR. When tested for its ability to enhance tumor cell eradication by Her-2/neu-specific CD8+ T cells in an adoptive transfer model in SCID mice, neu-Ab-IL-2 facilitated the elimination of tumor cells in vivo. Surprisingly, the combination of non-tumor-specific CD8+ T cells and fusion protein also induced a significant delay of tumor growth. This represents a novel approach for redirecting non-tumor-specific T cells to eliminate tumors.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Given the importance placed by the immune system on self-tolerance (1, 2), and the fact that tumors are self-tissue, tumor cells represent a particularly difficult target for immune attack. First, thymic and peripheral tolerance eliminates many of the T cells that could potentially recognize self (3), sparing only T cells that are of low avidity or that recognize epitopes that are expressed at a very low level on nonlymphoid cells (4, 5). Second, the small numbers of naive T cells that are present will not be activated to become effector cells unless provided with the necessary costimulatory signals (6, 7, 8, 9). Third, once successfully activated, T cells require a continuous source of IL-2 to remain viable (10, 11).

Some of the initial attempts in cancer immunotherapy were based on the ability of IL-2 to activate and expand T cells as well as other types of lymphokine activated killer (LAK)3cells (12). Patients were infused with high concentrations of IL-2 alone, with large numbers of LAK cells or with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes that had been expanded in vitro in the presence of IL-2 (13). Because high systemic concentrations of IL-2 proved toxic, other approaches were used to deliver the cytokine specifically to the tumor microenviroment to augment its immunogenicity. One such strategy was the construction of recombinant fusion proteins consisting of tumor-specific mAbs linked to IL-2 (14, 15). When administered in vivo, this molecule could promote eradication of tumors and their metastasis by CD8+ T cells and could lead to the development of a long-lived and transferable tumor immunity (16, 17, 18). It has been assumed that the mechanism of activity of the fusion protein is similar to that of soluble IL-2, because both molecules augment lytic activity of activated-effector cells.

Using transgenic mice that express HLA-A2.1/Kb molecules, we have recently identified several peptides derived from the Her-2/neu tumor-associated protein that are processed and presented in association with HLA-A*0201 (A2) molecules expressed by human tumors that express both A2 and Her-2/neu (19). CTL obtained from these mice were able to lyse a wide variety of human tumors. As reported by others, experiments to determine whether these CTL could prevent growth of human tumors in vivo in SCID mice required very high concentrations of exogenously provided IL-2 to optimize the activity of the adoptively transferred CTL (20). In an effort to avoid the use of such high concentrations of cytokine, we generated a fusion protein consisting of a single chain Her-2/neu-specific mAb linked to IL-2 (neu-Ab-IL-2). In the course of in vitro characterization of the fusion protein, we observed that it could mediate the formation of stable heteroconjugates between effector T cells expressing IL-2R and tumors expressing Her-2/neu. This resulted in lysis of any Her-2/neu-expressing cell by either CD8+ or Th1 CD4+ T cells in a non-MHC restricted manner. This cytolytic mechanism is mediated by Fas-Fas ligand (Fas L) rather than perforin and represents a novel form of redirected lysis that does not engage TCR. In addition, when delivered to SCID mice harboring human tumor cells, the fusion protein was able to direct the migration of non-tumor-specific T cells to the tumor site and this resulted in the elimination of tumor in vivo.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

The Clone-4 TCR transgenic murine line has been previously described (21). BALB/c, C57BL/6, and C.B.-17 scid/scid mice were obtained from the rodent breeding facility at The Scripps Research Institute. All animals were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions.

Cell lines

p773 is an A2-restricted CTL line derived from the (A2/Kb x huCD8)F1 transgenic mice and specific for the Her-2/neu peptide spanning residues 773–782 (19). p773 CTL was maintained in vitro by weekly restimulation in 2 ml cultures by incubating with 0.2 x 106 irradiated-Jurkat-A2 cells (20,000 rads) preincubated with the p773 peptide (20 µM) and 5 x 105 irradiated C57BL/6 spleen cells (3000 rads) as fillers in complete RPMI media (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 5 x 10-5 2-ME, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin) supplemented with 2% (v/v) T cell growth factor supernatant from Con A-stimulated rat spleen cells. Clone-4 TCR CTLs were obtained form the Clone-4-TCR transgenic mice that recognize an influenza hemagglutinin (HA) Kd-restricted peptide (21, 22). Spleen cells (2 x 106) from Clone-4 TCR mice were stimulated with 6 x 106 irradiated BALB/c splenocytes previously pulsed with 20 µM of the KdHA peptide in 2 ml of complete RPMI. Tumor cell lines used in these studies were as follows: NCI-H1355 (A2+/Her-2/neu+) provided by A.F. Gazdar (The University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX), OV5 (A2-/Her-2/neu+) was provided by P.S. Goedegebuure (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) and LG-2 (A2+/Her-2/neu-) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained in complete RPMI at 37°C in a 5% CO2 environment. CTLL-2 cells, an IL-2-dependent T cell line, were maintained in complete RPMI supplemented with 5% TCGF. The Th1-cloned line, K3-Th1, was kindly provided by Dr. Susan Webb (The Scripps Research Institute).

Plasmid construction

The single chain neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein was constructed by PCR amplification of the Fv portion of the single chain (scFv) anti-Her-2/neu Ab, C6.5 (23). Synthetic oligonucleotides were produced, introducing a BamHI restriction site at the 5' end and a EcoRI site at the 3' end of the Fv to allow insertion into the pCDNA3 expression vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). The human constant lambda (CL) chain was obtained by RT-PCR from mRNA of human bone marrow. An EcoRI site was added at the 5' end of the CL primer and an EcoRV site was added at the 3' end. The amplified CL chain was ligated into the pCDNA3 vector containing the anti-Her-2/neu scFv. Finally the murine IL-2 gene (obtained from R. Levy, Stanford University) was amplified by PCR adding an EcoRV site at the 5'end and a NotI site at the 3' end and ligating into the pCNDA3-scFv-CL to obtain the neu-scFv-CL-IL-2 fusion protein. We designated this construct neu-Ab-IL-2. For control purposes we constructed in a similar fashion the scFv linked to CL (neu-scFv-CL) designated neu-Ab. All constructs were assembled and inserted into the pCDNA3 expression vector as a single-reading frame and confirmed by restriction analysis and DNA sequencing. The specific genes encoding the VH and VL domains of the 37–38 anti-HA mAb (24) were cloned by rapid amplication of cDNA ends (RACE)-PCR utilizing the marathon cDNA amplification kit (Clonotech). Total RNA was isolated from the hybridoma cells and first and second strand cDNA was synthesized. An adaptor was ligated to the 5' double stranded cDNA to allow the amplification of the variable regions by PCR. Amplification was performed using an adaptor oligonuclotide and the antisense VH and VL primers. The amplified products were subcloned into the PCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen) and subjected to sequence analysis. The 37–38 anti-HA scFv-CL-IL-2 (37-38-Ab-IL-2) was constructed in the same fashion as the neu-scFv-CL-IL-2.

Expression and purification of the fusion protein

The neu-Ab-IL-2, neu-Ab, and 37-38-Ab-IL-2 plasmids were transfected into P3x63Ag8.658 (nonsecreting B cell myeloma) and cells were clonally selected for growth in the presence of 1 mg/ml of G418 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Supernatants from surviving clones of the neu-Ab-IL-2 and neu-Ab transfectants were screened for the ability to bind Her-2/neu+ cell line by FACS analysis. FACS analysis was performed by incubating 50 µl of the supernatants with tumor cells and then with 1 µg/sample of mouse-anti-human-CL (PharMingen, San Diego, CA); and next, with 1 µg/sample of goat-anti-mouse-FITC (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). Positive clones from the neu-Ab-IL-2 transfectants that recognize Her-2/neu were tested further for their ability to induce the proliferation of the IL-2-dependent cell line, CTLL-2. One positive clone that transfected with each construct was selected. The neu-Ab-IL-2 and neu-Ab fusion proteins were purified on an affinity column of anti-human CL (PharMingen) covalently linked to protein G matrix (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). Supernatants from neu-Ab-IL-2 and neu-Ab fusion proteins were passed over the column and eluted with 0.1 M glycine (pH 2.7). The eluate material was dialyzed against PBS. One liter of supernantant produced approximately 1 mg of purified fusion protein. All the experiments presented here were performed with affinity column purified-fusion proteins. The 37-38-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein has the ability to bind HA-positive cells and also has IL-2 activity (data not shown). The 37–38-Ab-IL-2 protein was purified in the same manner as neu-Ab-IL-2.

Conjugate formation

To assess T cell-target cell conjugate formation, 1 x 106/ml CTLL-2 cells were incubated for 1 h in a solution containing 0.1 µg/ml of the green fluorochrome, calcein AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Tumor cells (OV5) were incubated with 50 µg/ml of the red fluorochrome, dihydroethidium (Molecular Probes). Both cells were washed twice and mixed at a 1:1 ratio. Cells were incubated in a solution containing 1 µg of the indicated-fusion protein for 30 min at 37°C to allow conjugate formation. FACS analysis was performed for the detection of the conjugates.

IL-2 assay

IL-2 activity of the fusion proteins was determined by a standard T cell proliferation assay measuring the survival of the IL-2-dependent T cell line CTLL-2 by 3,[4,5-dimethythiazol-2yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide, thiazolyl blue (25) (MTT, Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Briefly, after IL-2 depletion for 24 h, 103 CTLL-2 cells were added to each well of a 96-well flat-bottom plate with various concentrations of recombinant human IL-2 (obtained from Biological Resource Branch, Nation Cancer Insititute, Bethesda, MD) or fusion protein. After 24 h, MTT was added at 5 mg/ml and incubated for 4 h. Color crystals produced by viable cells were dissolved in isopropanol and 0.04 N HCL, and their absorbance was read at 570–630 nm. All samples were tested in duplicate.

Cytotxicity assay

Target cells were incubated at 37°C with 150 µCi of 51Cr sodium chromate for 90 min. Cells were washed three times and resuspended in complete RPMI. For the assay, 51Cr-labeled target cells (104) were incubated with varying concentration of effector cells either in the presence or absence of the indicated fusion proteins (0.1 µg/well) in a final volume of 200 µl in U-bottomed 96-well microtiter plates. Supernatants were recovered after 6 h of incubation at 37°C, and the percent specific lysis was determined by the formula: percent specific lysis = 100 x (experimental release - spontaneous release)/(maximum release - spontaneous release). The role of perforin was assessed by chelating Ca2+ with EGTA (4 mM) and adding 3 mM MgCl2 to the media.

Adoptive transfer model

Six- to eight-week-old female C.B.-17 scid/scid mice were used for tumor implantation. Mice were injected with the transplantable NCI-H1355 tumor cell line. On day 0 animals were implanted subcutaneosly with 106 cells. Tumors were allowed to develop for 7 days before receiving CTLs. On day 7 after tumor cell inoculation, animals were randomly divided into groups of 3–5, and A2-restricted CTLs specific for Her-2/neu or Clone-4 CTL specific for the KdHA peptide were injected i.p. at 50 x 106 cells per animal. Control animals were injected with PBS only. On day 14, animals were injected again with a second equivalent dose of CTLs. From day 7 to day 21 animals were injected daily i.p. with 10 µg of neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein, 10,000 U of rIL-2, or PBS. Tumor growth was monitored every 5 days, and growth rates were determined by caliper measurements in two diameters.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Construction and expression of fusion proteins

The fusion protein encoding the C6.5 single chain Fv was first fused to the human CL chain and then linked to IL-2 (referred to as neu-Ab-IL-2; see Fig. 1GoA). The CL chain was included to provide a spacer between the Ab and the IL-2 to allow independent folding of each domain. The neu-Ab and 37-38-Ab-IL-2 fusion proteins were constructed for control experiments as described in Fig. 1Go. The neu-Ab was composed of the single chain Fv linked to the CL. The 37-38-Ab-IL-2 molecule has specificity for the influenza HA. All three fusion proteins were purified by anti-CL affinity columns from supernatants of appropriately transfected myeloma cells as described in Materials and Methods.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Schematic representation of the fusion proteins. A, Diagram of the fusion proteins: neu-Ab-IL-2 and neu-Ab. The 37-38-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein was constructed in the same fashion as the neu-Ab-IL-2. B, Representation of the linear map of the fusion protein constructs. The C6.5 single chain Ab directed against Her-2/neu was used to generate the fusion proteins. The C6.5 was fused to the human constant light chain and subsequently to the murine IL-2. All constructs were inserted into pCDNA-3 vector and transfected into the p3x63Ag8.658 nonsecreting myeloma. LH, leader sequence of the heavy chain; VH, variable region of the heavy chain; VL, variable region of the light chain; CL, constant region of the light chain.

 
Biological activity of the fusion proteins

FACS analysis was used to determine whether the neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein had retained both the ability to bind Her-2/neu and to be recognized by anti-IL-2 Ab. As shown in Fig. 2Go, both the neu-Ab and neu-Ab-IL-2 constructs bound to the Her-2/neu expressing OV5 cell line, but not to LG-2 cells that do not express Her-2/neu, as determined using a FITC-labeled anti-CL Ab (Fig. 2Go). Once bound to the OV5 cells, the neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein was also detectable using anti-IL-2 Ab, indicating that the IL-2 domain remained structurally intact. To determine whether the IL-2 retained its ability to bind to the IL-2R, the fusion protein was tested for its ability to bind CTLL-2 cells that express high levels of IL-2R. As shown in Fig. 3Go, binding was detected by the neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein but not with the neu-Ab. Thus, the constructs retain the ability to bind both Her-2/neu and IL-2R.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Binding of fusion protein to Her-2/neu+ cell lines. neu-Ab and neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion proteins are capable of binding the Her-2/neu+ cell line OV5. Staining was detected with a mouse anti-human-CL and FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse. The binding of the neu-Ab-IL-2 also is detected with an anti-murine-IL-2. The Her-2/neu- cell line, LG-2, was used as a negative control. No binding is detected on LG-2 with other fusion proteins.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Fusion proteins bind T cells through the IL-2R. CTLL-2 was incubated with neu-Ab-IL-2 or neu-Ab. Binding on the CTLL-2 cell line was through the IL-2R because no binding was detected with the neu-Ab. Staining was performed in the same manner as with the OV5 cell line.

 
The neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein was compared with rIL-2 with respect to its ability to support the proliferation of the IL-2-dependent T cell line, CTLL-2. CTLL-2 cells were incubated with serial dilutions of rIL-2 or neu-Ab-IL-2. As indicated in Fig. 4Go, 1 µg of fusion protein corresponds to 1200 IU of IL-2 activity.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. IL-2 activity of the neu-Ab-IL-2. Dilutions of the neu-Ab-IL-2 and rIL-2 were compared for the ability to induce proliferation by the IL-2-dependent CTLL-2 cell line. Values were normalized to the molar content of IL-2 in the fusion protein.

 
neu-Ab-IL-2 induces the formation of conjugates between effector and target cells

Considering the ability of the fusion protein to bind both T cells and tumor cells expressing Her-2/neu, it was of interest to determine whether the presence of the fusion protein could induce formation of stable conjugates between these two types of cell lines. To determine if this was the case, a CTL line specific for an A2-restricted Her-2/neu peptide 773 (19) and OV5 tumor cells, which express Her-2/neu but not A2, were individually stained with different color fluorescent dyes, washed, and then mixed in a 1:1 ratio in the presence of 1 µg of neu-Ab or neu-Ab-IL-2 (Fig. 5Go). Stable conjugates between T cells and tumor cells were formed only in the presence of neu-Ab-IL-2, demonstrating that this molecule can bridge noncognate effector and target cells and form heteroconjugates by binding the IL-2R on T cells and Her-2/neu on the tumor.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Induction of conjugate formation by neu-Ab-IL-2. Induction of conjugates between target and effector cells was assayed in the presence of neu-Ab (A) and neu-Ab-IL-2 (B). CTLL-2 cell line was stained with calcein AM (green fluorescence) and OV5 was stained with hydroethidine (red fluorescence). Stained cells were incubated in a 1:1 ratio in the presence of the fusion proteins and analyzed by FACS for formation of hetero conjugates. Upper left quadrant, OV5 cells; Lower right quadrant, CTLL-2 cells. Conjugates formation was seen as double positive cells in the upper right quadrant.

 
neu-Ab-IL-2 induces non-MHC-specific killing

It was previously demonstrated that Ab-IL-2 fusion protein could enhance the cytotoxic activity of LAK cells, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and activated CD8+ T cells against tumors cells in vitro (26). In these previous studies, in vitro cytotoxicity was equivalent when either soluble IL-2 or the fusion protein was added to the mixture of the tumor and effector cells in vitro. Therefore, it was assumed that the fusion protein was mimicking the activity of soluble IL-2 by enhancing LAK activity in vitro. To determine what contribution the specificity of the CTL may have under these conditions, we compared the ability of the fusion protein to promote the lysis of Her-2/neu expressing tumor cells, NCI-H1355, by either tumor-specific CTL, or CTL with specificity for an irrelevant peptide. The p773 CTL line can specifically lyse the A2+, Her-2/neu+ NCI-H1355 cells (19). As shown in Fig. 6GoA, this lysis could be enhanced in the presence of IL-2 or the neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein. The Kd-restricted Clone-4 TCR CTL, which does not specifically recognize NCI-H1355 cells, could also lyse these targets when in the presence of the neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein or IL-2 (Fig. 6GoB). Thus, as previously reported, the fusion protein could enhance cytotoxicity against tumor cells by activated-CD8+ CTL, regardless of the specificity of the TCR.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. IL-2-mediated lysis of tumor cells. Cytotoxicity assay was performed on the NCI-H1355 cell line (A2+Her/2neu+) in the presence of 0.1 µg of neu-Ab, neu-Ab-IL-2 or 10U of rIL-2. A, Lysis mediated by the A2-restricted p773 CTL specific for a Her-2/neu peptide. B, Lysis mediated by the non-tumor-specific CTL Clone-4 TCR. T cells were assayed for cytotoxicity in a 7-h 51Cr release assay.

 
Mechanism of killing induced by neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein

We wished to determine the mechanism of killing mediated by the neu-Ab-IL-2, particularly because it was not directed through the TCR. The two major pathways for T cell-mediated killing are perforin and Fas (27). It is known that perforin requires Ca2+ to mediate killing and is inhibited by EGTA (28). As shown in Fig. 7GoB, killing of OV5 cells by the Kd restricted Clone-4 TCR CTL was not inhibited by the presence of EGTA, suggesting that the killing was probably mediated by the Fas pathway. To confirm that killing was Fas mediated, CTLs obtained from gld+/+ mice (FasL positive) or gld-/- mice (FasL negative) Clone-4 TCR mice were compared. As shown in Fig. 7GoC, in the presence of the neu-Ab-IL-2, the Clone-4 TCR CTLs were able to kill the OV5 target cells whereas the Clone-4 TCR gld/gld CTLs could not, thus demonstrating that killing required the presence of FasL. The neu-Ab protein could not induce lysis. These data demonstrate that the noncognate killing induced by the neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein is mediated through the Fas-FasL pathway.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Killing mechanism induced by the fusion protein. To determine the role of perforin in IL-2-induced killing of the target cells by the T cells, the cytotoxic assay was performed on OV5 cells in the absence (A) or presence of MgCl2-EGTA (B) with the Clone 4-TCR CTLs. To test if the killing was mediated through the Fas-FasL pathway Clone-4-TCR CTLs and Clone-4 TCR FasL-deficient gld/gld CTLs were assayed on the OV5 cell line in the presence of neu-Ab-IL-2. T cells were assayed for cytotoxicity in a 7-h 51Cr release assay.

 
Because it is known that Th1-CD4 cells are also capable of Fas-mediated cytotoxicity, it was of interest to determine whether CD4+ T cells were also able to kill the tumor cells in the presence of the fusion protein. As demonstrated in Fig. 8Go, OV5 tumor cells were killed by the CD4+ K3-Th1 clone in the presence of neu-Ab-IL-2. Thus, the fusion protein enables both CD8+ and Th1-CD4+ T cells to kill Her-2/neu-expressing tumor cells.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. CD4- Th1 T cells are capable of non-TCR-specific killing in the presence of the neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein. The murine K3 CD4+-Th1 T cell clone was incubated with 51Cr labeled OV5 cells in the presence of 0.1 µg of neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein.

 
In vivo inhibition of tumor cell growth

Our original goal in producing the fusion protein was to use it to replace IL-2 to enhance the activity of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in vivo. To determine whether the neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein could perform this function in vivo, we used a model in which human tumor cells were transferred into SCID mice. NCI-H1355 tumor cells 1 x 106 (A2+, Her-2/neu+) were implanted s.c. into SCID mice and tumors were allowed to establish for 7 days at which time a small tumor mass was palpable at the site of injection. At day 7, animals were randomly divided into groups (3–5/group) and injected i.p. with 50 x 106 of the Her-2/neu-specific p773 CTLs or the KdHA-specific Clone-4 TCR CTLs. These T cells were preincubated with the indicated fusion protein before adoptive transfer into the animals. On day 14, mice were treated with a second equivalent dose of CTLs. Animals also received 10 µg daily of neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein from day 7 to day 21. As shown in Fig. 9GoA, tumor growth was delayed in mice that were treated with p773-CTL. However, in the presence of the neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein or rIL-2 (in amounts equivalent to that delivered by the fusion protein), complete rejection of the tumor was observed. Thus, IL-2 or the fusion protein could significantly enhance the ability of Her-2/neu-specific CTL to reject tumor cells.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9. Prevention of tumor growth in the presence of neu-Ab-IL-2. NCI-H1355 cells (1 x 106) line were implanted on day 0 s.c. into SCID mice. p773-CTLs or Clone-4 TCR CTLs were delivered on day 7 and day 14 (50 x 106/animal). Mice (3–5 animals/group) received neu-Ab-IL-2 (10 µg) injected daily (equivalent of 10,000 U/animal of rIL-2) from day 7 to day 21. Animals that received neu-Ab or rIL-2 were injected daily with 10 µg/animal of the fusion protein or 10,000 U/animal of rIL-2, respectively, from day 7 to 21. These same doses were used for animals injected with 37-38-Ab-IL-2. CTLs and fusion proteins were incubated for 30 min before injection into the animals to allow the fusion protein to bind with the T cells. One group of animals did not receive the neu-Ab-IL-2 until 36 h after injection of the CTLs (36 h post). Control animals were injected with PBS only.

 
Considering the ability of IL-2 and the fusion protein to induce tumor cell killing by tumor-specific CTL, it was of interest to determine whether the CTL used in vivo needed to be tumor specific. To this end, the same protocol was followed but the non-tumor-specific Clone-4 TCR CTL was used. As shown in Fig. 9GoB, Clone-4 TCR CTL alone did not retard tumor growth. Thus, the CTL specificity was important for inhibition of tumor growth. However, if mice received Clone-4 TCR CTLs followed by injection with neu-Ab-IL2, a significant reduction in tumor growth was evident. (Fig. 9GoB). In contrast, treatment of control animals with Clone-4 TCR CTL in combination with neu-Ab fusion protein plus rIL-2 did not prevent tumor growth. Thus, conjugate formation between effector and target cells, as promoted by the fusion protein, appears to be required for tumor rejection by non-tumor-specific CTL in vivo. To determine whether CTLs require preincubation with Ab-IL2 fusion protein to achieve optimum tumor elimination, treatment with the fusion protein was delayed until 36 h after the CTLs were first injected. As can be observed in Fig. 9GoB, the T cells do not need to be preincubated with fusion protein to be effective in eliminating tumor.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
These studies were initiated to determine whether IL-2 fusion proteins could be used to enhance the efficacy of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in vivo, thereby eliminating the need for high concentrations of circulating IL-2. Such high levels of IL-2 are normally required for viability of CD8+ T cells in vivo but are known to be toxic in humans (29). Ab-IL-2 fusion proteins have been used successfully for tumor immunotherapy and enhance a variety of IL-2R- bearing effector cell populations, including activated PBLs and NK cells (26). Biodistribution studies demonstrated significant localization of such molecules to the sites of tumor foci (17). In previous evaluations of the in vivo efficacy of Ab-IL-2 fusion proteins the molecules contained Fc domains and had the capacity to trigger effector cells through binding of Fc{gamma}RIII receptors (30). In this report, our focus was on the activity of the IL-2 portion of the molecule that was engineered to be devoid of Fc domains. Thus, its activity on effector cells was mediated solely through binding to the IL-2R on T cells. Additionally, there have been no studies of the significance of TCR specificity to the activity of fusion proteins in vivo.

The tumor target Ag selected for these studies was Her-2/neu. We had developed several CD8+ T cell lines specific for peptide epitopes of this tumor-associated Ag presented by A2 molecules and we wished to determine how effective such CTL would be in eliminating human tumor cell lines that express this epitope. To test this hypothesis, we obtained a single chain Her-2/neu- specific Ab and used the variable regions to construct a neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein. The molecule that was produced maintained both its IL-2 activity and Ab binding specificity, as demonstrated by antigenicity and biological activity.

Based on the current results, there appear to be several advantages in the use of fusion proteins as opposed to systemic application of rIL-2 in monitoring tumor-specific effectors in vivo. First, as demonstrated by FACS analysis, the fusion protein can stably bridge effector cells bearing IL-2R with tumor cells. This could serve to concentrate activated T cells that are not necessarily tumor specific, yet express high levels of IL-2R at the tumor site. Next, as recently described by Esser et al. (31), engagement of IL-2R on T cells can trigger Fas-mediated lysis. Indeed, this has been proposed to be the mechanism of activation of LAK cells. The significance of Fas in the current studies was supported by our findings that FasL-deficient CTL could not kill in the presence of the neu-Ab-IL-2 fusion protein. By directing cells expressing IL-2R to the tumor, the fusion protein allows non-tumor-specific, activated T cells to lyse the tumor through the Fas-mediated pathway. Indeed, both activated-CD8+ T cells and TH1-CD4+ cells were able to mediate lysis in vitro. This finding suggested the possibility of using non-tumor-specific T cells such as Clone-4 TCR cells to control tumor growth in vivo. It is anticipated that CD4+ T cells would also be capable of eliminating tumors in vivo. Future experiments will examine whether CD4+ T cells alone are also sufficient to eradicate tumors and will assess localization of each subset at the tumor site.

Our results demonstrate that despite the ability of Ab-IL-2 to mediate Fas killing, tumor-specific T cells have an advantage over non-tumor-specific T cells in eliminating tumors in vivo. There are several possible reasons why tumor-specific T cells are more effective. First, the homing of tumor-specific T cells to the tumor site might be more efficient than that of non-tumor- specific cells. Second, there is the additional targeting of the effector cell through TCR specificity so that the T cell has the ability to lyse through both perforin- and Fas-mediated mechanisms. Third, triggering the T cell through the TCR leads to secretion of cytokines such as TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma}. These may enhance the lytic capacity of the effectors through FasL by increasing both Fas and class I MHC on the target cells, thus augmenting cytolysis. We confirmed this by treating tumor cells with TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma}, which augmented the expression of Fas on the target cells, increasing the susceptibility of lysis by non-tumor-specific T cells in the presence of the Ab-IL-2 fusion protein (data not shown). It is possible that cytokines may be administered in vivo to augment Fas expression on tumors.

Ab-IL-2 fusion proteins could represent an alternative to the use of bifunctional Abs that bridge T cells with tumors for redirecting the lytic activity of T cells to a tumor site (32). These two strategies differ in that bifunctional Abs trigger T cells through their TCR, whereas IL-2 fusion proteins trigger through IL-2R. This difference may have important consequences in terms of T cell viability, as it is known that activation induced cell death requires signaling through the TCR. It will be of interest to compare the longevity of tumor-specific and non-tumor-specific T cells in vivo in this model.

The current findings add to the growing list of the pleiotropic effects of Ab-targeted IL-2 therapy in eliminating tumors. Importantly, they suggest alternative strategies for applying these fusion proteins. For example, these therapies may be used in conjunction with vaccination to tumor-associated Ag, or alternatively, in cases in which these T cells or Ag may be unavailable, fusion proteins may be used in conjunction with vaccination to unrelated Ag that could serve to establish a reservoir of activated T cells that could then be targeted by fusion proteins to the tumor microenviroment. Such activated T cells could provide a source of cytokines required for up-regulation of Fas on the tumor, thereby enhancing their sensitivity to Fas-mediated killing. Future studies are required to evaluate various elements of these hypotheses.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Ralph Reisfeld for his advice and critical review of this manuscript. We also thank Dr. Susan Webb for providing the cloned-K3-Th1 cells used in these studies.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA57855 and CA25803. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Linda A. Sherman, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, IMM-15, Rm. R201, La Jolla, CA 92037. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: LAK, lymphokine activated killer cells; HA, hemagglutinin; CL, constant lambda; L, ligand. Back

Received for publication July 20, 1998. Accepted for publication September 8, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kappler, J. W., N. Roehm, P. Marrack. 1987. T cell tolerance by clonal elimination in the thymus. Cell 49:273.[Medline]
  2. Kisielow, P., H. Bluthmann, U. D. Staerz, M. Steinmetz, H. V. Boehmer. 1988. Tolerance in T cell receptor transgenic mice involves deletion of nonmature CD4+8- thymocytes. Nature 333:742.[Medline]
  3. Cabaniols, J. P., R. Cibotti, P. Kourilsky, K. Kosmatopoulos, J. M. Kanellopoulos. 1994. Dose-dependent T cell tolerance to an immunodominant self peptide. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1743.[Medline]
  4. Theobald, M., J. Biggs, J. Hernandez, J. Lustgarten, C. Labadie, L. A. Sherman. 1997. Tolerance to p53 by A2.1-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 185:883.
  5. Morgan, D. J., H. T. C. Kreuwel, S. Fleck, H. I. Levitsky, D. M. Pardoll, L. A. Sherman. 1998. Activation of low avidity CTL specific for a self epitope results in tumor rejection but not autoimmunity. J. Immunol. 160:643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Janeway, C. A., K. Bottomly. 1994. Signal and signs for lymphocytes responses. Cell 76:275.[Medline]
  7. Sotomayor, E. M., I. Borrello, H. I. Levitsky. 1996. Tolerance and cancer: a critical issue in tumor immunology. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 7:443.
  8. Chen, L., S. Ashe, W. A. Brady, I. Hellstrom, K. E. Hellstrom, J. A. Ledbetter, P. McGowan, P. S. Linsley. 1992. Costimulation of antitumor immunity by the B7 counterreceptor for the T lymphocyte molecules CD28 and CTLA-4. Cell 71:1039.
  9. Townsend, S. E., J. P. Allison. 1993. Tumor rejection after direct costimulation of CD8+ T cells by B7-transfected melanoma cells. Science 259:368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Greenberg, P. D.. 1991. T cell therapy of tumors: mechanisms operative in the recognition and elimination of tumor cells. Adv. Immunol. 49:281.[Medline]
  11. Vella, A. T., S. Dow, T. A. Potter, J. Kappler, P. Marrack. 1998. Cytokine-induced survival of activated T cell in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Grimm, E. A., A. Maxumder, H. Z. Zhang, S. A. Rosenberg. 1982. Lymphokine activated killer cell phenomenon. Lysis of natural killer-resistant fresh solid tumor cells by interleukin-2 activated autologous human peripheral blood lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 155:1823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hayakama, K., M. A. Salmeron, D. R. Parkinson, A. B. Markowitz, E. C. von Eschenbach, S. S. Legha, C. M. Balch, M. I. Ross, L. B. Augustus, K. Itoh. 1991. Study of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for adoptive therapy of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) and metastatic melanoma: sequential proliferation of cytotoxic natural killer and noncytotoxic T cells in RCC. J. Immunother. 10:313.
  14. Reisfeld, R. A., S. D. Gillies. 1996. Antibody-interleukin 2 fusion protein: a new approach to cancer therapy. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 10:160.[Medline]
  15. Becker, J. C., N. Varki, S. D. Gillies, K. Furukawa, R. A. Reisfeld. 1996. An antibody-interleukin-2 fusion protein overcomes tumor heterogenicity by induction of a cellular response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Xiang, R., H. N. Lode, C. S. Dolman, T. Dreier, N. Varki, X. Qian, K-M. Lo, Y. Lan, M. Super, S. D. Gillies, R. A. Reisfeld. 1997. Elimination of establish murine colon carcinoma metastases by antibody-interleukin 2 fusion protein therapy. Cancer Res. 57:4948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Becker, J. C., J. D. Pancook, S. D. Gillies, K. Furukawa, R. A. Reisfeld. 1996. T cell-mediated eradication of murine metastatic melanoma induced by targeted interleukin 2 therapy. J. Exp. Med. 183:2361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Becker, J. C., N. Varki, S. D. Gillies, K. Furukawa, R. A. Reisfeld. 1996. Long-lived and transferable tumor immunity in mice after targeted interleukin-2 therapy. J. Clin. Invest. 98:2801.[Medline]
  19. Lustgarten, J., M. Theobald, C. Labadie, D. LaFace, P. Peterson, M. L. Disis, M. A. Cheever, L. A. Sherman. 1997. Identification of Her-2/neu CTL epitopes using double transgenic mice expressing HLA-A2.1 and human CD8. Hum.Immunol. 52:109.[Medline]
  20. Melief, C. J. M., W. M. Kast. 1995. T-cell immunotherapy of tumors by adoptive transfer of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and by vaccination with minimal essential epitopes. Immunol. Rev. 145:167.[Medline]
  21. Lo, D., J. Freedman, S. Hesse, R. D. Palmiter, R. L. Brinster, L. A. Sherman. 1992. Peripheral tolerance to an islet cell-specific hemagglutinin transgene affects both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:1013.[Medline]
  22. Morgan, D. J., R. Liblau, B. Scott, S. Fleck, H. O. McDevitt, N. Sarvetnick, D. Lo, L. A. Sherman. 1996. CD8+ T cell-mediated spontaneous diabetes in neonatal mice. J. Immunol. 157:978.[Abstract]
  23. Schier, R., A. McCall, G. P. Adams, K. W. Marshall, H. Merritt, M. Yim, R. S. Crawford, L. M. Weiner, C. Marks, J. D. Marks. 1996. Isolation of picomolar affinity anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv by molecular evolution of the complementarity determining regions in the center of the antibody binding site. J. Mol. Biol. 263:551.[Medline]
  24. Clarke, S.H., K. Huppi, D. Ruezinsky, L. Staudt, W. Gerhard, M. Weigert. 1985. Inter- and intraclonal diversity in the antibody response to influenza hemagglutinin. J. Exp. Med. 161:687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Mosman, T.. 1983. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 65:55.[Medline]
  26. Sabzevari, H., S. D. Gillies, B. M. Mueller, J. D. Pancook, R. A. Reisfeld. 1994. A recombinant antibody-interleukin 2 fusion protein suppresses growth of hepatic human neuroblastoma metastases in severe combined immunodeficiency mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:9626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Berke, G.. 1995. The CTL’s kiss of death. Cell 81:9.[Medline]
  28. Liu, C.C., P. M. Persechini, J. D. Young. 1995. Perforin and lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis. Immunol. Rev. 146:145.[Medline]
  29. Dillman, R. O.. 1994. The clinical experience with interleukin-2 in cancer therapy. Cancer Biother. 9:183.[Medline]
  30. Naramura, M., S. D. Gillies, J. Mendelsohn, R. A. Reisfeld, B. M. Mueller. 1994. Mechanisms of cellular cytotoxicity mediated by a recombinant antibody-IL-2 fusion protein against melanoma cells. Immunol. Lett. 39:91.
  31. Esser, M. T., R. D. Dinglasan, B. Krishnamurthy, C. A. Gullo, M. B. Graham, V. Lam Braciale. 1997. IL-2 induces Fas Ligand/Fas (CD95L/CD95) cytotoxicity in CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocyte clones. J. Immunol. 158:561.
  32. de Gast, G. C., J.G. van de Winkel, B.E. Bast. 1997. Clinical perspectives of bispecific antibodies in cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 45:121.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Meidenbauer, J. Marienhagen, M. Laumer, S. Vogl, J. Heymann, R. Andreesen, and A. Mackensen
Survival and Tumor Localization of Adoptively Transferred Melan-A-Specific T Cells in Melanoma Patients
J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 2161 - 2169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. P. M. Sutmuller, L. R. H. M. Schurmans, L. M. van Duivenvoorde, J. A. Tine, E. I. H. van der Voort, R. E. M. Toes, C. J. M. Melief, M. J. Jager, and R. Offringa
Adoptive T Cell Immunotherapy of Human Uveal Melanoma Targeting gp100
J. Immunol., December 15, 2000; 165(12): 7308 - 7315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. K. Darcy, N. M. Haynes, M. B. Snook, J. A. Trapani, L. Cerruti, S. M. Jane, and M. J. Smyth
Redirected Perforin-Dependent Lysis of Colon Carcinoma by Ex Vivo Genetically Engineered CTL
J. Immunol., April 1, 2000; 164(7): 3705 - 3712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lustgarten, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lustgarten, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, L. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS