The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Encke, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wands, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Encke, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wands, J. R.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 161: 4917-4923.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Genetic Immunization Generates Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses Against the Nonstructural Proteins of the Hepatitis C Virus in a Murine Model1

Jens Encke, Jasper zu Putlitz, Michael Geissler and Jack R. Wands2

Molecular Hepatology Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Exposure to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with a high prevalence of persistent viral infection and the development of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recovery from acute infection may depend upon the generation of broad-based cellular immune responses to viral structural and nonstructural proteins. We used the DNA-based immunization approach in BALB/c mice to determine whether the HCV nonstructural proteins NS3, NS4, and NS5 will induce Ab responses, CD4+ Th cell proliferation, and cytokine release in response to stimulation by recombinant proteins as well as generate CD8+ CTL activity both in vitro and in vivo. We found that the nonstructural proteins were particularly good immunogens and produced cellular immune responses when administered as a DNA construct. Indeed, a tumor model was established following inoculation of syngenic SP2/0 cells stably transfected with NS5. We observed protection against tumor formation and growth only in mice immunized with the NS5-encoding DNA construct, establishing the generation of significant CTL activity in vivo by this technique. The results indicate that genetic immunization may define the cellular immune response of the host to HCV nonstructural proteins and is a promising approach for vaccine development.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)3 is the major cause of posttransfusion and sporadic non-A, non-B hepatitis (1) and is found throughout the world. There is a prevalence of 0.6 to 2% in western countries and <=15% in other regions of the world (2). Approximately 60% of individuals exposed to HCV will develop chronic infection and hepatitis; 20 to 40% will eventually progress to cirrhosis and liver failure (3). More important, persistent HCV infection is associated with a high risk of primary hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly in the setting of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis (4). Effective therapy of chronic HCV infection has been limited, at best, and only IFN and ribavirin have been shown to exhibit beneficial antiviral activity (5). Indeed, ~10 to 15% of individuals treated with IFN alone will respond and eradicate HCV from the liver. However, recent studies have revealed that individuals who recover from acute HCV infection develop substantial CD4+ T cell proliferative responses against the nonstructural proteins as compared with those individuals who develop persistent HCV infection (6, 7). This type of cellular immune response suggests that the nonstructural proteins may be the more critical immunogens to eradicate persistent viral infection from the host. In this context, direct injection of DNA encoding for viral genes in combination with different facilitators into the muscle or skin has been shown to induce broad-based humoral and, more important, cell-mediated immune responses, and is especially effective in generating protective cytotoxic T cell responses against a variety of pathogens (8, 9, 10, 11). However, the generation of such protective immune responses in humans remains to be established.

In the present investigation, we evaluated in vitro and in vivo humoral and cellular immune responses generated by DNA-based immunization against the three different nonstructural proteins of HCV in a murine model. It was found that the cDNAs encoding for the NS3 serine protease and helicase and NS5 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase were particularly effective in generating high-level CD4+ and CD8+ activities against epitopes that reside on these nonstructural proteins.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plasmid construction

As a source of viral genes, a plasmid designated pBRTM/HCV1-3011 covering the full-length open reading frame (ORF) of HCV was used to clone into expression vectors (12). Constructs pAp031-NS3, pAp031-NS4, and pAp031-NS5 were PCR-cloned after inserting engineered start and stop codons as well as restriction enzyme sites using the following primers: for NS3, 5'-GG TCT AGA TTG ATG GCG CCC ATC ACG GC-3' (XbaI), 5' CAC ACG CGT TCA CGT GAC GAC CTC CAG GT 3' (MluI); for NS4, 5'-G GTC TAG ATG AGC ACC TGG GTG CTC-3' (XbaI) and 5'-CCA GGA TCC TCA GCA TGG AGT GGT ACA-3' (BamHI); and for NS5, 5'-T CAG TCT AGA ATG TCC GGC TCC TGG CTA AGG GA-3' (XbaI) and 5'-A GCT ACG CGT TCA CCG GTT GGG GAG GAG GT-3' (MluI). After PCR amplification using a high-fidelity PCR system (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), the cDNA fragments were inserted into the plasmid expression vector pAp031 containing a Rous sarcoma virus enhancer element and a CMV promoter (Apollon, Malvern, PA). Constructs were transformed into DH5{alpha} cells, and plasmid DNA was subsequently purified by either 2x cesium chloride centrifugation or with a Qiagen Giga kit using the Endofree buffer system (Santa Clara, CA). Correct insertion of cDNAs coding for of the nonstructural proteins was verified by sequencing analysis using standard methods. To establish stable NS3-, NS4-, and NS5-expressing cell lines as target cells for the CTL assays, the nonstructural protein-encoding gene fragments were also cloned into the pcDNA3 and pcDNA3.1/Zeo(-) expression vectors (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) with a neomycin selectable marker. An XbaI and MluI fragment of NS3 and NS5 was subcloned into the NheI/MluI site of Litmus-38 vector (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), cut with EcoRI and SalI, and ligated into the EcoRI/XhoI multiple cloning site of pcDNA3 and pcDNA3.1/Zeo(-), respectively. An XbaI and BamHI fragment containing NS4 was ligated into Litmus-29 (New England Biolabs), recut with KpnI and EcoRI, and subsequently ligated into the pcDNA3 vector. Plasmids were designated pcDNA3-NS3, pcDNA3-NS4, and pcDNA3.1/Zeo(-)-NS5.

In vitro expression

The HuH-7 human hepatoma cell line was transiently transfected with the various constructs by the calcium phosphate method to assess expression levels of HCV nonstructural proteins. In brief, cell lysates were prepared in modified RIPA buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris, 0.5% deoxycholate, and 1% SDS) after metabolic labeling with [35S]methionine and cysteine for 4 h. Cell lysates were precleared with horse serum and subsequently bound to Sepharose A by preincubation overnight with polyclonal antisera WU 110 (NS3), WU 148/151 (NS4), and WU 115 (NS5) (12). After separating the proteins by SDS-PAGE, the gels were dried and exposed. NS5 protein expression was also determined by Western blot and immunofluorescence analysis using a murine mAb (Biogenesis, Sandown, NH). To generate stably transfected cell lines expressing NS3, NS4, and NS5, the syngenic BALB/c mouse myeloma derived cell line SP2/0 was transfected by electroporation with pcDNA3-NS3, pcDNA3-NS4, or pcDNA3.1/Zeo(-)-NS5. Cells growing in selection medium were cloned by limiting dilution (0.3 cell/well) and screened by the methods described above. However, attempts to clone stable NS4-expressing cell lines were unsuccessful.

Immunization protocol

Female BALB/c (H-2d) mice were maintained under standard pathogen-free conditions in the animal facility of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and used at the age of 6 to 20 wk for the in vivo studies. A total of 100 µg of plasmid DNA in 100 µl of 0.9% NaCl was injected two and three times over five different sites into the quadriceps muscle of the mice. Booster injections were given into the opposite leg every 14 days. As a positive control for all immunologic experiments, 5 µg of recombinant NS3, NS4, and NS5 protein (Mikrogen, Munich, Germany) was injected i.p. in CFA at day 0 and boosted with the same amount of protein in 0.05% SDS after 4 and 8 wk. As negative controls for these experiments, empty plasmid vector and recombinant hepatitis B virus surface Ag (HBsAg) (Engerix, Smith Kline Beecham, Philadelphia, PA) were employed. All mice were sacrificed at 10 days after the last immunization.

Measurement of humoral immune responses

Levels of anti-NS3, NS4, and NS5 Abs were determined in the serum of each immunized animal by ELISA. In brief, microtiter plates (Microtest IIIM flexible assay plate, Falcon, Oxnard, CA) were coated with the above-described recombinant proteins overnight at 4°C (0.5 µg/well). After blocking with FBS for 2 h at 20°C, a 1/50 dilution of mouse serum was added to the plates and incubated at 20°C for an additional 1 h. After washing four times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20, a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse Ab (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) was applied at a 1/2000 dilution. Plates were washed following a 1-h incubation, and substrate was added for color development and read in an automatic reader.

Lymphoproliferation and cytokine release assays

Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (Aerrane, Anaquest, NJ), and spleen cells were harvested. E were removed by incubation in 0.83% NH4Cl/0.17 M Tris (pH 7.4) for 5 min at 25°C. Spleen cells were washed two times and cultured in triplicate using 96-well round-bottom plates at 5 x 105 cells/well in 200 µl DMEM (Cellgro Mediatech, Washington, DC) containing 10% FBS and 2-ME. Cells were stimulated with recombinant nonstructural proteins NS3, NS4, and NS5-4 at different concentrations (0, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 µg/ml). As negative controls, effector cells were stimulated with recombinant HCV core or HBsAg proteins at the same concentrations. After stimulation for 3 days, [3H]thymidine was added (1 µCi/well). Cells were incubated for an additional 18 h, and the [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA was measured after harvesting. Incorporation of radioactivity was corrected for background activity ({Delta} cpm). For determination of cytokine release, effector cells were cultured as described above; IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-{gamma} levels were measured in the culture supernatant by commercial kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Endogen, Boston, MA).

CTL activity

Spleen cells derived from immunized mice were suspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 2-ME (5 x 10-5M) and analyzed for cytotoxic activity following 5 days of in vitro stimulation. In vitro stimulation was performed in 25-ml flasks with a total volume of 12 ml. Murine rIL-2 was added once at a concentration of 5 U/ml, and responder cells (4 x 107) were cocultured with 2 x 106 irradiated (10,000 rad) syngenic SP2/0 cells stably expressing either the full-length NS3 or NS5 protein (SP2/NS3-3, SP2/NS5-21). After 5 days, cytotoxic effector lymphocyte populations were harvested and washed in serum-free medium; a 4-h 51Cr release assay was performed in 96-well round-bottom plates (total volume of 140 µl) using 51Cr-labeled SP2/NS3-3 or SP2/NS5-21. These cells (1 x 106) were incubated for 1 h with 100 µl of 51Cr (1 mC/ml) and subsequently washed three times in DMEM containing 10% FCS (4°C). Parental SP2/0 or SP2/19 cells expressing the HCV core protein were used as controls for Ag specificity of lysis and background activity. Assays for CTL activity were performed at lymphocyte E:T ratios of 100:1, 30:1, 10:1, and 3:1, respectively, using 1 x 104 51Cr-labeled target cells/well. T cell depletion experiments were conducted by incubating effector cells with either an anti-CD4+ or CD8+ mAb containing hybridoma supernatant (GK1.5 anti-CD4, rat or 3.155 anti-CD8, rat) for 30 min at 4°C; next, the cells were washed and then incubated at 37°C with complement (1/5 dilution of low-toxicity rabbit complement; Cedarlane Laboratories, Hornby, Canada) before performing the CTL assay described above.

Assessment of CTL activity in vivo

Mice were immunized i.m. three times with either Mock DNA or pApNS5 vector. Some animals were also immunized i.p with recombinant NS5 protein or a combination of both. Recombinant proteins (5 µg i.p.) were administered as a mixture of NS5-4 (aa 2622–2868) and NS5-12 (aa 2007–2268). At 1 wk after the last immunization with the various plasmid constructs or recombinant protein, 2 x 106 syngenic SP2/0-derived cells stably expressing NS5 were washed, resuspended in 200 µl PBS, and inoculated s.c. into the right flank. SP2/0 cells that stably expressed HCV core protein (SP2/19) were used as a control in selected animals. Tumor formation was assessed at 15 days postinoculation, and the number of animals with tumors and tumor weight was determined.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression of HCV nonstructural proteins in mammalian cells

HCV is a positive-strand RNA virus with a genome length of ~9.5 kb. One large ORF encodes for a polyprotein precursor of ~3000 aa that is processed by a combination of host and viral proteases into >=10 different structural and nonstructural proteins (12, 13, 14). We cloned the genes encoding for the individual nonstructural proteins with engineered start and stop codons into an expression plasmid driven by a CMV promoter and a Rous sarcoma virus enhancer (pAp031). The expression vector pcDNA3 containing a neomycin selection marker was also used to generate stable SP2/0-derived cell lines (Fig. 1Goa). The plasmid constructs were sequenced across the cDNA inserts, and protein expression was analyzed in vitro in HuH-7 cells after transient transfection and in SP2/0 target cells after stable transfection, respectively. Signals corresponding to proteins with molecular masses of ~70 kDa for NS3, 30 kDa for NS4, and 125 kDa for NS5 were observed in cellular lysates but not in supernatant from transfected cells (Fig. 1Gob).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Expression of nonstructural proteins following transient transfection of HuH-7 and stable transfection of SP2/0 cells. a, a single large ORF of HCV encodes for a polyprotein precursor of ~3011–3030 aa that is cleaved by host signal and virus proteases into the different structural and nonstructural proteins (arrows). Gene sequences of NS3, NS4, and NS5 were PCR-amplified, inserted into pcDNA3 or pcDNA3.1(-), and sequenced. b, lanes 1–6: After transient transfection of HuH-7 cells with these constructs and controlling for transfection efficiency with a ß-galactosidase assay, cells were starved for 30 min in methionine and cysteine-free medium and labeled for 4 h with [35S]methionine and cysteine. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with polyclonal rabbit sera specific for the nonstructural proteins, captured by Sepharose A beads, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. Lanes 1, 3, and 5 are mock DNA-transfected cells and serve as negative controls (Mock). Lanes 2, 4, and 6 show specific bands of ~70 kDa for NS3, ~30 kDa for NS4, and 125 kDa for NS5. Lanes 7–10: SP2/0 cells were transfected with pcDNA3-based constructs containing the genes for NS3, NS4, and NS5. After antibiotic selection, cells were cloned by limiting dilution (0.3 cells/well), and expanded and analyzed either by radioactive labeling and immunoprecipitation for NS3 or by Western blot for NS5 as described above. Lanes 7 and 9 represent cell lysates derived from cells stably expressing HCV core protein as a negative control (SP2/19); Lanes 8 and 10 indicate a specific expression of NS3 and NS5. These cells were used for in vitro stimulation and as target cells in the CTL assays.

 
Humoral immune responses

Specific Ab responses directed against all three nonstructural proteins were found in all animals by ELISA following three immunizations. No Ag-specific immune responses were detected in mice immunized with mock DNA (Fig. 2Goa). As positive controls, mice were vaccinated three times i.p. with recombinant NS3, NS4, and NS5 proteins in combination with CFA; as expected, the mice demonstrated a strong humoral immune response (data not shown).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. a, Humoral immune responses to NS3, NS4, and NS5 generated by DNA-based immunization. Serum Ab levels were measured by ELISA (each group: n = 5). Controls included wells coated with BSA and sera derived from mock-immunized mice. As positive controls, mice were immunized i.p. with recombinant proteins (data not shown). b, T cell proliferation was measured at 3 days after in vitro stimulation with recombinant proteins. Cells were incubated with [3H]thymidine for 18 h and harvested. The {Delta} cpm was determined by subtracting background activity (i.e., incubation without Ag). Note that incubation of cells with 1 µg of recombinant NS3 protein was toxic; therefore, no proliferation was observed. Mice immunized with recombinant protein in conjunction with CFA had a 5- to 10-fold higher response (data not shown). c–e, Cytokine secretion into the supernatant measured after 48 h of in vitro stimulation for IFN-{gamma} (c), IL-2 (d), and IL-4 (e). Note that stimulation with NS3 was performed at 0.1 µg/ml due to toxic effects at 1 µg/ml. For comparison, results are shown for mice that were immunized three times i.p. with recombinant proteins (n = 4). As a negative control, mice were immunized with recombinant HBsAg.

 
Cellular immune responses

To investigate cell-mediated immune responses to the nonstructural proteins, spleen cells were harvested and restimulated either with recombinant Ag or with Ag expressed by stably transfected cell lines in vitro. Substantial lymphocyte proliferation was induced by all nonstructural proteins at different Ag concentrations as measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation (Fig. 2Gob). Immunization with recombinant protein i.p. as a means of generating maximum stimulation produced a 5- to 10-fold higher lymphocyte proliferative rate for all three proteins (data not shown). The cytokine profile determined after DNA-based immunization demonstrated a classic Th1 response, with high levels of IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 2Goc) and IL-2 (Fig. 2God) secreted into the cell culture supernatant. The cytokine release after incubation with recombinant NS3 could only be studied at a concentration of 0.1 µg/ml, since higher concentrations of NS3 (1 µg/ml) were toxic to the cells. In contrast, very little IL-4 production was observed after genetic immunization with genes encoding for the HCV nonstructural proteins (Fig. 2Goe).

Because CTL responses are essential to eliminate virus from infected cells, we studied the ability of splenocytes derived from immunized mice to lyse syngenic SP2/0 murine myeloma target cells stably expressing NS3 and NS5 proteins in a 51Cr release assay. The NS3- and NS5-immunized mice exhibited a specific cytotoxic T cell response after 5 days of in vitro stimulation, whereas low activity was observed against SP2/0 or SP2/19 (stably expressing HCV core protein) cells used as controls for target cell specificity (Fig. 3Go, a and b). To demonstrate the phenotype of cells producing the specific lysis, splenocytes were incubated with CD8+- or CD4+-specific mAbs in the presence of complement. These studies revealed that the cytotoxic activity was mediated by CD8+ cells (Fig. 3Goc). We were unable to establish SP2/0 cell lines stably expressing NS4 protein; therefore, CTL activity was not measured against this HCV nonstructural protein.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Cytotoxic T cell response to NS5 (a) and NS3 (b) at different E:T cell ratios (100:1, 30:1, 10:1, and 3:1). Splenocytes were incubated in vitro with irradiated murine myeloma cells stably expressing NS3 and NS5 for 5 days (n = 5). Subsequently, CTL activity was determined in a 4-h 51Cr release assay against the stable target cell lines. Background activity against SP2/0 or SP2/19 (expressing HCV core) was subtracted to obtain specific lysis values. c, In T cell-depletion experiments (n = 3), cells were incubated for 30 min on ice with anti-CD8+ or CD4+ mAbs followed by a 30-min incubation at 37°C with complement. Control cells were incubated without complement and anti-CD8+ or CD4+ mAbs. Background activity was determined using SP2/19 cells as a nonrelevant negative control cell line.

 
In vivo CTL activity was assessed by a tumor model. Only 40% of mice immunized with a cDNA encoding for NS5 protein and challenged with a syngenic murine myeloma cell line (SP2/NS5-21) stably expressing NS5 developed tumors after 15 days. Moreover, tumor size was significantly less (p < 0.0001) as determined by the measurement of tumor weight when compared with mice immunized with mock DNA or recombinant NS5 protein or mice immunized with the same syngenic SP2/0 cell line expressing a different HCV structural protein (HCV core) as a control (Fig. 4Go, a and b). Indeed, 90 to 100% of mice immunized with mock DNA or challenged with SP2/9 cells demonstrated tumor formation, confirming the specificity of the CTL activity in this tumor model. It is important to emphasize that immunization with recombinant NS5 protein in CFA did not protect animals against tumor formation. To assess the effect of a combination of DNA-based immunization and recombinant protein vaccination, one group of animals was immunized with both. There was partial but significant (p < 0.03) protection against tumor formation, but combined immunization was not as effective as immunization three times with a DNA construct encoding for NS5 protein alone (Fig. 4Goa).



View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. a, Tumor model to assess CTL activity generated in vivo. Mice were immunized three times with either pApNS5 or a mock DNA (100 µg) or recombinant NS5 protein (5 µg). The final group (E) received a combination of DNA immunization and recombinant protein. At 15 days after tumor challenge with SP2NS5-21 or SP2/19 (HCV core-expressing) cells, the number of mice that had developed tumors was determined, and the tumor weight was measured. b (from left to right), representative examples of: a mouse immunized with mock DNA and challenged with SP2/NS5-21 cells (A); a mouse immunized with pApNS5 and challenged with SP2/NS5-21 cells (resulting in a tumor-free animal) (B); a mouse immunized with pApNS5 and challenged with SP2/19 (C); and a mouse immunized with recombinant NS5 protein and challenged with SP2/NS5-21 cells (D). Note the large tumor formation on the right flank in mice A, C, and D but not in mouse B.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
During active HCV infection, humoral and cellular immune responses have been shown to be polyclonal and multispecific. It is likely that the host immune response produced during persistent HCV infection is responsible, in part, for production of the liver cell injury. However, it may not be sufficiently broad-based or vigorous enough to promote viral clearance and generate protective immunity in individuals with chronic HCV infection (15). Individuals who have recovered from acute HCV infection have recently been shown to develop strong proliferative CD4+ T cell responses directed against the nonstructural proteins (6, 7). More important, the generation of HCV-specific CTL activity appears to be associated with control of viral replication in individuals with chronic hepatitis (16, 17).

It is not known whether the nonstructural proteins NS3, NS4, and NS5 are sufficiently immunogenic to generate broad-based and vigorous CTL responses in vivo. The genetic immunization approach was employed to test this hypothesis, since this technique has been shown previously to induce cellular immune responses of different levels against a variety of pathogens in animal model systems (9, 10, 11, 18, 19). The advantage of this method compared with immunizations with soluble recombinant proteins or peptides is its ability to induce a more Th1-like immune response with the production of inflammatory CD4+ T cell as well as cytotoxic T cell activity, presumably due to the intracellular processing of viral proteins into peptides and subsequent loading onto MHC class I molecules in transfected muscle cells as well as to yet to be defined interactions of the complex with APCs. In contrast, immunization with soluble protein primarily leads to a humoral immune response due to processing through the MHC class II pathway. Immunization with synthetic peptides has several disadvantages, since only a limited number of epitopes are available for stimulation of the host immune response. In contrast, all naturally occurring B and T cell epitopes encoded for each protein by the DNA construct of interest are presumably preserved for recognition by TCRs and consequently will generate very broad-based humoral and cellular immune responses (20).

During active viral replication, HCV has a very high mutation rate, and several genotypes and subtypes have been described previously (13, 14). In this regard, the Ags are processed intracellularly in infected hepatocytes, and a large number of epitopes are presented to the immune system. However, neutralizing Abs generated against the envelope region of HCV have been found to be insufficient to provide protection and tend to promote immunoselection of quasispecies (21). In this study, we present evidence that DNA-based vaccination with plasmids encoding for three different nonstructural proteins of HCV is capable of eliciting Ag-specific immune responses in both effector pathways of the immune system. It was noteworthy that all animals developed detectable Ab responses after three immunizations. In this regard, these nonstructural proteins are far better Ags to stimulate humoral immune responses compared with previous studies by us using the HCV core structural protein (22, 23). Similar to the findings of HCV core, the humoral immune response to the NS3 protein was weak; therefore, it may be necessary to activate APCs by the coadministration of cytokine-expressing plasmids such as IL-2 and granulocyte macrophage CSF to achieve optimal humoral and cellular immune responses, (23, 24). Nevertheless, the generation of inflammatory CD4+ T cell responses with a predominant Th1 phenotype was demonstrated for all three plasmids encoding for NS3, NS4, and NS5. Most important, a specific CD8+ CTL response was generated for NS3 and NS5 with lysis values that have been shown previously to induce protection against a variety of pathogens in animal model systems (18, 19). It was not possible to measure CTL responses to NS4, since we were unable to establish stable NS4-expressing SP2/0 myeloma cell lines. However, CD4 T cell responses and IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} release were in the range observed for NS3 and NS5, and NS4 appears to be an attractive candidate protein for this immunization approach as well. Since no small animal model is currently available for HCV infection, we determined whether the CTL responses generated by DNA-based immunization would protect animals against tumor formation using syngenic SP2/0 tumor cells stably transfected with a cDNA encoding for NS5 protein. Approximately 60% of mice were protected against tumor formation, indicating the in vivo CTL activity produced by this immunization approach. Moreover, tumor weight in those animals that developed tumors was significantly reduced compared with mice immunized with mock DNA or recombinant NS5 protein. This study emphasizes the capability of assessing cellular immune responses against HCV nonstructural proteins in an animal model as measured by inhibition of tumor growth. It should now be possible to determine the fine specificity of CTL epitopes with overlapping peptides using these techniques.

In contrast to the data presented here, DNA immunization using a construct encoding for the HCV core structural protein produced less vigorous cellular and humoral immune responses (22, 23, 25). The envelope region has great sequence diversity among the various genotypes and may not be a good target region because of immunoselection of viral variants known to occur during natural viral infection (22, 25, 26). The NS3 gene encodes for a serine protease that cleaves the viral polyprotein precursor posttranslationally at several junctions and also serves as the viral helicase. The NS5 region encodes for the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of the virus. Both genomic regions are believed to be highly important and critical for viral replication; therefore, these regions may serve as important molecular targets for antiviral approaches (27, 28, 29). Based on both previous clinical studies, which demonstrate the importance of the cellular immune response to the nonstructural proteins with respect to preventing persistent viral infection in humans (6, 7), and the experimental results presented here, which demonstrate that the nonstructural proteins are particularly potent candidates in generating cellular immune responses in mice, we are led to believe that DNA-based immunization with genes encoding for the HCV nonstructural proteins is an attractive approach for the construction of therapeutic and prophylactic vaccines against HCV. However, the clinical efficacy of DNA-based immunization in generating antiviral immune responses against HCV in humans remains to be established. Finally, it will be important in the future to determine whether different genotypes or subtypes of HCV may circumvent the immune responses induced by one genotype following DNA-based immunization.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. C. Rice (Washington University, St. Louis, MO) for providing us with the pBRTM-HCV-ORF clone and the polyclonal rabbit antisera against the HCV nonstructural proteins. We also thank Dr. C. Annaiah (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) for the hybridoma CD4+ and CD8+ mAbs and his technical comments.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants CA-35711, AA-20169, and AA-02666 and by grants from the American Cancer Society and the Tan Yan Kee Foundation. J.E. and M.G. were supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bonn, Germany) (En 338/1-1 and Ge 824/1-1), and J.z.-P. was supported by the Stipendienprogramm "Infektionsforschung" from the German Cancer Research Center (Heidelberg, Germany). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jack. R. Wands, Molecular Hepatology Laboratory, MGH Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HCV, hepatitis C virus; HBsAg, hepatitis B virus surface Ag; ORF, open reading frame. Back

Received for publication May 1, 1998. Accepted for publication June 29, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Choo, Q. L., G. Kuo, A. J. Weiner, L. R. Overby, D. W. Bradley, M. Houghton. 1989. Isolation of a cDNA clone derived from a blood-borne non-A, non-B viral hepatitis genome. Science 244:359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Heintges, T., J. R. Wands. 1997. Hepatitis C virus: epidemiology and transmission. Hepatology 26:521.[Medline]
  3. Alter, M. J., H. S. Margolis, K. Krawczynski, F. N. Judson, A. Mares, W. J. Alexander, P. Y. Hu, J. K. Miller, M. A. Gerber, R. E. Sampliner, et al 1992. The natural history of community-acquired hepatitis C in the United States: the Sentinel Counties Chronic non-A, non-B Hepatitis Study Team. N. Engl. J. Med. 327:1899.[Abstract]
  4. Tsukuma, H., T. Hiyama, S. Tanaka, M. Nakao, T. Yabuuchi, T. Kitamura, K. Nakanishi, I. Fujimoto, A. Inoue, H. Yamazaki, et al 1993. Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic liver disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 328:1797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jr Carithers, R. L., S. S. Emerson. 1997. Therapy of hepatitis C: meta-analysis of interferon {alpha}-2b trials. Hepatology 26:83S.[Medline]
  6. Missale, G., R. Bertoni, V. Lamonaca, A. Valli, M. Massari, C. Mori, M. G. Rumi, M. Houghton, F. Fiaccadori, C. Ferrari. 1996. Different clinical behaviors of acute hepatitis C virus infection are associated with different vigor of the anti-viral cell-mediated immune response. J. Clin. Invest. 98:706.[Medline]
  7. Diepolder, H. M., R. Zachoval, R. M. Hoffmann, E. A. Wierenga, T. Santantonio, M. C. Jung, D. Eichenlaub, G. R. Pape. 1995. Possible mechanism involving T-lymphocyte response to non-structural protein 3 in viral clearance in acute hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet 346:1006.[Medline]
  8. Wolff, J. A., R. W. Malone, P. Williams, W. Chong, G. Acsadi, A. Jani, P. L. Felgner. 1990. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Science 247:1465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ulmer, J. B., J. J. Donnelly, S. E. Parker, G. H. Rhodes, P. L. Felgner, V. J. Dwarki, S. H. Gromkowski, R. R. Deck, C. M. De Witt, A. Friedman, et al 1993. Heterologous protection against influenza by injection of DNA encoding a viral protein. Science 259:1745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Donnelly, J. J., A. Friedman, D. Martinez, D. L. Montgomery, J. W. Shiver, S. L. Motzel, J. B. Ulmer, M. A. Liu. 1995. Preclinical efficacy of a prototype DNA vaccine: enhanced protection against antigenic drift in influenza virus. Nat. Med. 1:583.[Medline]
  11. Boyer, J. D., K. E. Ugen, B. Wang, M. Agadjanyan, L. Gilbert, M. L. Bagarazzi, M. Chattergoon, P. Frost, A. Javadian, W. V. Williams, Y. Refaeli, R. B. Ciccarelli, D. McCallus, L. Coney, D. B. Weiner. 1997. Protection of chimpanzees from high-dose heterologous HIV-1 challenge by DNA vaccination. Nat. Med. 3:526.[Medline]
  12. Grakoui, A., C. Wychowski, C. Lin, S. M. Feinstone, C. M. Rice. 1993. Expression and identification of hepatitis C virus polyprotein cleavage products. J. Virol. 67:1385.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Houghton, M.. 1996. Hepatitis C viruses. D. K. B. N. Fields, and P. M. Howley, eds. In Virology Vol. 2:1035.-1058. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.
  14. Rice, C.. 1996. Flaviviridae: the viruses and their replication. D. K. B. N. Fields, and P. M. Howley, eds. In Virology Vol. 1:931.-959. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.
  15. Chisari, F. V.. 1997. Cytotoxic T cells and viral hepatitis. J. Clin. Invest. 99:1472.[Medline]
  16. Rehermann, B., K. M. Chang, J. G. McHutchison, R. Kokka, M. Houghton, F. V. Chisari. 1996. Quantitative analysis of the peripheral blood cytotoxic T lymphocyte response in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J. Clin. Invest. 98:1432.[Medline]
  17. Nelson, D. R., C. G. Marousis, G. L. Davis, C. M. Rice, J. Wong, M. Houghton, J. Y. Lau. 1997. The role of hepatitis C virus-specific CTLs in chronic hepatitis C. J. Immunol. 158:1473.[Abstract]
  18. Tascon, R. E., M. J. Colston, S. Ragno, E. Stavropoulos, D. Gregory, D. B. Lowrie. 1996. Vaccination against tuberculosis by DNA injection. Nat. Med. 2:888.[Medline]
  19. Huygen, K., J. Content, O. Denis, D. L. Montgomery, A. M. Yawman, R. R. Deck, C. M. De Witt, I. M. Orme, S. Baldwin, C. D’Souza, A. Drowart, E. Lozes, P. Vandenbussche, J. P. Van Vooren, M. A. Liu, et al 1996. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a tuberculosis DNA vaccine. Nat. Med. 2:893.[Medline]
  20. McDonnell, W. M., F. K. Askari. 1996. DNA vaccines. N. Engl. J. Med. 334:42.[Free Full Text]
  21. Shimizu, Y. K., M. Hijikata, A. Iwamoto, H. J. Alter, R. H. Purcell, H. Yoshikura. 1994. Neutralizing antibodies against hepatitis C virus and the emergence of neutralization escape mutant viruses. J. Virol. 68:1494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Tokushige, K., T. Wakita, C. Pachuk, Moradpour, D. B. Weiner, V. R. Zurawski, Jr., and J. R. Wands. 1996. Expression and immune response to hepatitis C virus core DNA-based vaccine constructs. Hepatology 24:14.
  23. Geissler, M., A. Gesien, K. Tokushige, J. R. Wands. 1997. Enhancement of cellular and humoral immune responses to hepatitis C virus core protein using DNA-based vaccines augmented with cytokine-expressing plasmids. J. Immunol. 158:1231.[Abstract]
  24. Xiang, Z., H. C. Ertl. 1995. Manipulation of the immune response to a plasmid-encoded viral antigen by coinoculation with plasmids expressing cytokines. Immunity 2:129.[Medline]
  25. Lagging, L. M., K. Meyer, D. Hoft, M. Houghton, R. B. Belshe, R. Ray. 1995. Immune responses to plasmid DNA encoding the hepatitis C virus core protein. J. Virol. 69:5859.[Abstract]
  26. Nakano, I., G. Maertens, M. E. Major, L. Vitvitski, J. Dubuisson, A. Fournillier, G. De Martynoff, C. Trepo, G. Inchauspe. 1997. Immunization with plasmid DNA encoding hepatitis C virus envelope E2 antigenic domains induces antibodies whose immune reactivity is linked to the injection mode. J. Virol. 71:7101.[Abstract]
  27. Behrens, S. E., L. Tomei, F. R. De. 1996. Identification and properties of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of hepatitis C virus. EMBO J. 15:12.[Medline]
  28. Kim, J. L., K. A. Morgenstern, C. Lin, T. Fox, M. D. Dwyer, J. A. Landro, S. P. Chambers, W. Markland, C. A. Lepre, E. T. O’Malley, S. L. Harbeson, C. M. Rice, M. A. Murcko, P. R. Caron, and J. A. Thomson. 1996. Crystal structure of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease domain complexed with a synthetic NS4A cofactor peptide [Published erratum appears in 1997 Cell 89:159]. Cell 87:343.
  29. Love, R. A., H. E. Parge, J. A. Wickersham, Z. Hostomsky, N. Habuka, E. W. Moomaw, T. Adachi, Z. Hostomska. 1996. The crystal structure of hepatitis C virus NS3 proteinase reveals a trypsin-like fold and a structural zinc binding site. Cell 87:331.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
L. Frelin, T. Wahlstrom, A. E. Tucker, J. Jones, J. Hughes, B. O. Lee, J.-N. Billaud, C. Peters, D. Whitacre, D. Peterson, et al.
A Mechanism To Explain the Selection of the Hepatitis e Antigen-Negative Mutant during Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
J. Virol., February 1, 2009; 83(3): 1379 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
S. Gehring, S. H. Gregory, P. Wintermeyer, C. Aloman, and J. R. Wands
Generation of Immune Responses against Hepatitis C Virus by Dendritic Cells Containing NS5 Protein-Coated Microparticles
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., February 1, 2009; 16(2): 163 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. Ahlen, J. Soderholm, T. Tjelle, R. Kjeken, L. Frelin, U. Hoglund, P. Blomberg, M. Fons, I. Mathiesen, and M. Sallberg
In Vivo Electroporation Enhances the Immunogenicity of Hepatitis C Virus Nonstructural 3/4A DNA by Increased Local DNA Uptake, Protein Expression, Inflammation, and Infiltration of CD3+ T Cells
J. Immunol., October 1, 2007; 179(7): 4741 - 4753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
P. Karayiannis, J. Main, and H. C. Thomas
Hepatitis vaccines
Br. Med. Bull., August 31, 2004; 70(1): 29 - 49.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
H. Yu, L. A. Babiuk, and S. van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk
Priming with CpG-enriched plasmid and boosting with protein formulated with CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and Quil A induces strong cellular and humoral immune responses to hepatitis C virus NS3
J. Gen. Virol., June 1, 2004; 85(6): 1533 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
X. Jiao, R. Y.-H. Wang, Q. Qiu, H. J. Alter, and J. W.-K. Shih
Enhanced hepatitis C virus NS3 specific Th1 immune responses induced by co-delivery of protein antigen and CpG with cationic liposomes
J. Gen. Virol., June 1, 2004; 85(6): 1545 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
B. E. Simon, K. A. Cornell, T. R. Clark, S. Chou, H. R. Rosen, and R. A. Barry
DNA Vaccination Protects Mice against Challenge with Listeria monocytogenes Expressing the Hepatitis C Virus NS3 Protein
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2003; 71(11): 6372 - 6380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
U. Lazdina, C. Hultgren, L. Frelin, M. Chen, K. Lodin, O. Weiland, G. Leroux-Roels, J. A. Quiroga, D. L. Peterson, D. R. Milich, et al.
Humoral and CD4+ T helper (Th) cell responses to the hepatitis C virus non-structural 3 (NS3) protein: NS3 primes Th1-like responses more effectively as a DNA-based immunogen than as a recombinant protein
J. Gen. Virol., June 1, 2001; 82(6): 1299 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Zucchelli, S. Capone, E. Fattori, A. Folgori, A. Di Marco, D. Casimiro, A. J. Simon, R. Laufer, N. La Monica, R. Cortese, et al.
Enhancing B- and T-Cell Immune Response to a Hepatitis C Virus E2 DNA Vaccine by Intramuscular Electrical Gene Transfer
J. Virol., December 15, 2000; 74(24): 11598 - 11607.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Arichi, T. Saito, M. E. Major, I. M. Belyakov, M. Shirai, V. H. Engelhard, S. M. Feinstone, and J. A. Berzofsky
Prophylactic DNA vaccine for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection: HCV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte induction and protection from HCV-recombinant vaccinia infection in an HLA-A2.1 transgenic mouse model
PNAS, January 4, 2000; 97(1): 297 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Encke, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wands, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Encke, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wands, J. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS