The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Booker, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Booker, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, P. L.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 161: 4536-4541.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Expression and Function of Fas on Cells Damaged by {gamma}-Irradiation in B6 and B6/lpr Mice1

Jessica K. Booker*, Elizabeth A. Reap* and Philip L. Cohen2,*,{dagger}

Departments of * Medicine and {dagger} Microbiology/Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Fas (CD95) is a cell surface protein that mediates apoptosis. lpr is a mutation of the Fas gene caused by a retroviral insertion resulting in premature termination of transcription and aberrant splicing of Fas mRNA. Mice homozygous for the lpr gene develop lymphoproliferation and produce autoantibodies closely resembling those of human systemic lupus erythematosus. While lpr mice have been reported to express low levels of normally spliced Fas mRNA, it is unknown whether they express functional Fas protein. Here we show that splenocytes from lpr mice that have been damaged by {gamma}-irradiation expressed Fas protein. Fas was up-regulated on irradiated B6 cells and could be detected on B6/lpr cells undergoing apoptosis following in vitro culture. Detection of Fas on live lpr cells was demonstrable when apoptosis was blocked by zinc. In a short term chimera system, Fas was shown to play a role, in vivo, in the disposition of radiation-injured cells from both normal and lpr mice. The addition of anti-Fas Ab to in vitro cultures resulted in an increase in apoptosis in both B6 and B6/lpr cells. Detection of intact Fas message and low levels of Fas protein in lpr mice has led to the consideration of lpr as a leaky mutation. This study demonstrates that lpr mice can produce functional Fas protein. This system is also appropriate for identifying the in vivo role of Fas/FasL in apoptosis following other cell manipulations.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Fas (CD95, APO-1) is a type I cell surface membrane protein that induces apoptosis in susceptible cells when cross-linked by Fas ligand (FasL)3 or Ab (1). The autoimmune and lymphoproliferative disease of lpr and gld mice results from mutations of the Fas and FasL genes, respectively. The defect in lpr mice is due to the insertion of the early transposable element, ETn, into the second intron of the Fas gene (2, 3, 4, 5). This retroviral transposon insertion in Fas causes premature termination of transcription as well as aberrant splicing of mRNA, resulting in a marked reduction both of Fas mRNA and protein expression. Despite the lpr Fas defect, low levels (2% or less) of normally spliced Fas mRNA have been detected from the thymus of MRL/lpr mice (2, 4, 6), but it is not known whether lpr mice can express functional Fas protein. The gld defect results from a point mutation in the C-terminal region of the FasL gene (7).

A recent report from our laboratory has shown that Fas/FasL has a role in radiation-induced cell death (8). Cells from lpr mice were relatively resistant to in vitro apoptosis after exposure to in vivo or in vitro {gamma}-irradiation. Because irradiated normal cells showed a marked increase in Fas expression, and because much of the radiation-induced death of normal cells was blocked in the presence of a Fas-IgG fusion protein, which competed with cell-bound Fas for FasL binding, it was concluded that Fas/FasL interactions played an important role in the death of radiation-injured cells. These studies raised the question of whether such Fas/FasL interactions were of significance in vivo and whether FasL was provided mainly by the injured cells themselves or by normal bystander spleen cells.

Because gld mice lack functional FasL, it was possible to test the role of this molecule in the elimination of injured cells by transferring allotype-disparate irradiated cells into gld mice and comparing their fate with that of similar cells infused into normal mice capable of expressing FasL. Our results indicate that host FasL is an important factor but is not entirely responsible for the elimination of irradiated transferred cells. Unexpectedly, the clearance of lpr cells was also accelerated by the presence of FasL in hosts. The unanticipated finding that lpr cells are capable of expressing significant amounts of Fas after injury may help explain this finding and offer insights into the pathology of these mice and the normal regulation of Fas expression.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

The following mice were maintained in our breeding facility: C57BL/6-Thy1a/Thy1a (B6-Thy1.1; Ighb), C57BL/6-lpr/lpr-Thy1a/Thy1a (B6/lpr-Thy1.1; Ighb), C57BL/6-Igha/Igha (B6.C20; Igha, Thy1.2), and C57BL/6-gld/gld-Igha/Igha (B6.C20/gld; Igha, Thy1.2). The B6, B6-Thy1.1, B6/lpr, and B6/gld strains were originally obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), and the B6.C20 strain was obtained from Dr. Gayle Bosma (Institute for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, PA). The B6/lpr-Thy1.1 strain was developed in our laboratory as previously described (9). The B6.C20/gld strain was developed in our laboratory by intercrossing B6.C20 with B6/gld and selecting for homozygosity for gld and Igha. B6-Thy1.1 and B6/lpr-Thy1.1 mice used as donors for cell transfer were 6–8 mo old, and B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld recipients were 2–3 mo old. Analysis of Fas expression was done with 8-mo-old B6, B6-Thy1.1 B6/lpr, and B6/lpr-Thy1.1 mice. Cells cultured in the presence and absence of anti-Fas Ab, as well as the two-color Annexin V vs anti-Fas staining, were from 6-mo-old B6-Thy1.1 and B6/lpr-Thy1.1 mice.

In vitro culture of splenocytes for analysis of Fas expression and anti-Fas treatment

Spleens were removed from B6-Thy1.1 and B6/lpr-Thy1.1 mice; two spleens were pooled for each strain. Single-cell suspensions were made by rupturing the splenic capsule between the frosted ends of two glass slides and washing with PBS (University of North Carolina Cancer Center Tissue Culture Facility, Chapel Hill, NC). Erythrocytes were lysed with ammonium chloride for 5 min at 4°C and washed twice. Irradiated cells received 150 rad of {gamma}-radiation in a Gamma-cell 40 137Cs apparatus (Atomic Energy of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). Both irradiated and nonirradiated cells were washed once and resuspended in complete medium (RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS, 15 mM HEPES, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and nonessential amino acids, 2 x 10-5 M 2-ME, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin). Cells were cultured for 18 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2/95% air humidified atmosphere, in 24-well tissue culture plates, with 4 x 106 cells per well (8). Zinc acetate was added to the cultures indicated, at a final concentration of 1 mM, to inhibit apoptosis (10). The anti-Fas Ab treatment was done with 1 µg/ml of Jo2 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA).

In vivo transfer and recovery of donor splenocytes

Spleens were removed from B6-Thy1.1 and B6/lpr-Thy1.1 mice; 5–12 spleens were pooled for each strain. Single-cell suspensions were made and erythrocytes lysed as described above. Irradiated cells received 150 rad of {gamma}-radiation. Cells were washed once and resuspended in PBS at 3 x 108 cells per ml. Cells were kept on ice throughout their preparation. Donor cells (3 x 107) were transferred to recipient B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld mice by tail vein injection.

Dexamethasone treatment of splenocytes from B6-Thy1.1 mice was done by culturing for 24 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2/95% humidified air atmosphere in 24-well tissue culture plates with 4 x 106 cells per well in complete medium with 10-6 M dexamethasone. Following culture, cells were washed three times in PBS. Untreated cells were kept at 4°C. Dexamethasone-treated and untreated cells were resuspended and transferred as above.

Twenty hours after injection, spleens were harvested from recipient mice. Single-cell suspensions were made as above, but each spleen was prepared and analyzed individually. Following erythrocyte lysis, splenocytes were washed and resuspended in HBSS supplemented with calcium, magnesium, 15 mM HEPES, 0.1% NaN3, and 3% FCS (HBSS complete). Total splenocyte recovery was determined using a model D2N Coulter Counter (Hialeah, FL).

Immunofluorescence staining

All cells were incubated with an anti-Fc{gamma} receptor Ab (2.4G2, mouse IgG2b; American Type Culture Collection) to block nonspecific staining. Fluorescein-conjugated anti-Fas (Jo2, hamster IgG), anti-2,4,6-trinitrophenyl (TNP) (UC8-4B3, hamster IgG), anti-Thy1.2 (53-2.1, rat IgG2a) anti-IgMb (AF6-78, mouse IgG1), Annexin V, phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-B220 (RA3-6B2, rat IgG2a), anti-Thy1.1 (Ox-7, mouse IgG1), and anti-Fas (Jo2, hamster IgG) were obtained from PharMingen). Abs were added to 1 x 106 cells in 96-well microtiter plates and incubated for 20 min at 4°C. Cells were washed once in HBSS complete, and then twice in PBS with 0.1% NaN3, and were fixed in an equal volume of PBS and 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Fixed cells were analyzed with a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) using Cytomation data acquisition and software (Fort Collins, CO) with size gating on the lymphocyte population. Forward angle vs 90° light scatter was plotted on a linear scale, while red and green fluorescence data were plotted on a four-decade logarithmic scale. Twenty thousand events were collected per sample in all experiments (8). For the Annexin V vs anti-Fas staining, cells were first stained with the anti-Fas Ab, as described above, and then resuspended in binding buffer (PBS with 0.01 M HEPES/NaOH, pH 7.4; 0.14 mM NaCl; and 2.5 mM CaCl2). Cells were then stained with Annexin V for 15 min at room temperature and immediately analyzed by FACScan.

Analysis of apoptotic cells

Cells undergoing apoptosis were distinguished from live and necrotic cells by their characteristic light scatter profile. Cell death by necrosis resulted in a large decrease in both forward angle light scatter and side scatter, while cells undergoing apoptosis showed a less marked decrease in forward angle light scatter together with an increase in side scatter (8, 11, 12). Cells stained with Annexin V were analyzed by gating on all but the necrotic cells, based on their forward angle light scatter vs side scatter profiles. Cells within this gate that were Annexin V positive were deemed apoptotic.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance techniques were used to analyze the data statistically as a completely randomized model (13). Data were tested for homogeneity of variance and normality before analysis (14). Statistical tests were considered significant if p <= 0.05 and marginally significant if p <= 0.10.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Fas expression on cells undergoing apoptosis but not on live cells in B6/lpr mice

It has been shown previously that a smaller fraction of spleen cells from B6/lpr mice undergoes apoptosis following {gamma}-irradiation, compared with normal B6 mice (8). To better understand the relationship between the fate of individual cells and their levels of Fas expression, two-parameter immunofluorescence staining was undertaken of spleen cells subjected to irradiation. Figure 1Go shows immunofluorescence analysis of irradiated and control splenic lymphocytes from B6-Thy1.1 mice analyzed after short term in vitro culture using forward vs side angle light scatter changes to distinguish between viable and apoptotic cells. Under these conditions, there was substantial Fas expression both on live cells and on those undergoing apoptosis, either spontaneous or radiation induced. Following {gamma}-irradiation, as noted previously, Fas expression increased further on live cells from 52 to 86% (8). There was an increase from 68 to 79% on those cells undergoing apoptosis. The proportion of lymphocytes with apoptotic light scatter profiles increased from 30% without {gamma}-irradiation to 58% with {gamma}-irradiation.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Expression of Fas on live and apoptotic cells from B6-Thy1.1 mice. A, Flow cytometry analysis of untreated or {gamma}-irradiated splenocytes from 8-mo-old B6-Thy1.1 mice cultured overnight. Forward angle (fsc) vs side scatter (ssc) profiles were used to identify live and apoptotic lymphocyte populations (top and bottom gates, respectively). B, Fas-FITC staining on untreated (top) and {gamma}-irradiated (bottom) splenocytes cultured overnight. Cells were stained with fluorescein-conjugated anti-Fas or anti-TNP (an isotype control Ab). An anti-Fc receptor Ab was used to block nonspecific binding, and single-color flow cytometry was used to measure the expression of Fas. In each histogram, the peak on the left represents the isotype control. Live (left) and apoptotic (right) cells were identified on the basis of their forward angle and side scatter characteristics shown in A.

 
Figure 2Go shows Fas expression on B6/lpr cells analyzed in parallel to those shown in Figure 1Go. As anticipated, live lpr splenic lymphocytes did not express Fas, even after {gamma}-irradiation. Remarkably, Fas was expressed on many lpr cells undergoing spontaneous apoptosis, and the percentage positive for Fas increased from 52 to 65% following {gamma}-irradiation. Staining with the isotype-matched control anti-TNP Ab was negative on all cells. The expression of Fas on B6/lpr cells undergoing apparent apoptosis has been observed consistently and has also been seen on apoptotic cells from MRL/lpr mice (data not shown).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Expression of Fas on live and apoptotic cells from B6/lpr-Thy1.1 mice. Untreated (top) and {gamma}-irradiated (bottom) splenocytes from 8-mo-old B6/lpr-Thy1.1 mice were cultured overnight. Cells were stained with fluorescein-conjugated anti-Fas or anti-TNP (an isotype control Ab). An anti-Fc receptor Ab was used to block nonspecific binding, and single-color flow cytometry was used to measure the expression of Fas. In each histogram, the peak on the left represents the isotype control and is negative on all populations. Live (left) and apoptotic (right) cells were identified on the basis of their forward angle and side scatter characteristics as shown in Figure 1GoA.

 
Detection of Fas expression on apoptotic but not live cells from B6/lpr mice was demonstrated by using forward vs side angle light scatter changes to distinguish between viable and apoptotic cells. To confirm these results by an additional method, we analyzed cells by two-color staining with Annexin V and anti-Fas Abs. Cells from B6 and B6/lpr were irradiated and analyzed for Annexin V and anti-Fas staining at 0 and 20 h. The isotype control (anti-TNP) was subtracted from all anti-Fas-positive staining. On apoptotic cells (Annexin V positive) from B6 mice, Fas expression increased twofold, from 16 to 43%. A fivefold increase in Fas expression on apoptotic cells was seen in cells from B6/lpr mice (2–10%).

Fas expression on live B6/lpr cells treated with zinc

The presence of Fas on B6/lpr cells falling within the apoptotic gate did not establish a causal relationship between Fas expression and apoptosis, nor was it certain that the observed fluorescent staining was occurring on the cell surface. If the apoptotic signal for some of the lpr cells was mediated through Fas, then Fas expression must occur before apoptosis and should be detectable on live lpr cells, if only for a short time. To determine whether Fas could be detected on live B6/lpr cells, zinc acetate was added to cell cultures following irradiation, to inhibit apoptosis (15). In this way, Fas-expressing lpr cells might be identified before the completion of apoptosis. Figure 3Go shows immunofluorescence analysis of Fas expression on B6/lpr cells falling within the live or apoptotic gates, following irradiation and culture in the presence and absence of zinc acetate. As shown in Figure 2Go and again in Figure 3GoA, Fas was expressed only on the cells falling within the apoptotic gate. In Figure 3GoB, in which cells were cultured with zinc acetate, a fraction of the live cells expressed Fas, coincident with marked inhibition of apoptosis, as judged by light scatter. Results from several experiments done with zinc acetate are compiled in Table IGo.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Immunofluorescence analysis of Fas expression on live and apoptotic cells from irradiated B6/lpr mice. Forward angle vs side scatter and FITC profiles are shown. Regions were drawn around the live and apoptotic cells, and arrows indicate the FITC profiles of each population. A, Cells were irradiated, cultured overnight in the absence of zinc acetate, and stained with Fas-FITC. B, Cells were irradiated, cultured overnight in the presence of 1 mM zinc acetate, and stained with Fas-FITC. The isotype control was negative for all samples.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Expression of Fas after in vitro culture1

 
T and B cells of the donor allotype were recovered from recipients in short term chimeras

The next experiments were designed to ask whether the increased Fas expressed on irradiated cells rendered them more susceptible to in vivo death and subsequent elimination. Short term chimeras were generated to compare the recovery of B6-Thy1.1 and B6/lpr-Thy1.1 donor cells from B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld recipients. Donor B6-Thy1.1 and B6/lpr-Thy1.1 (Ighb) splenocytes were injected into B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld (Igha, Thy 1.2) recipients. By staining with anti-allotype Abs, donor T and B cells could be detected in recipient mice by flow cytometry (Fig. 4Go). Each panel represents an individual mouse, shown as a representative of a group of three. Donor T and B cells are shown in the shaded quadrants. As anticipated, a small fraction of the injected cells "homed" to the spleen. Most of the injected cells were probably eliminated promptly, before homing, via nonimmune mechanisms.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Identification of donor cells from chimeras injected with untreated cells. The lymphocyte population was gated on the forward angle vs side scatter histogram (not shown). T cells (top) were identified with two-color staining using anti-Thy1.2-FITC (horizontal axis) and anti-Thy1.1-PE (vertical axis). B cells (bottom) were identified with two-color staining using anti-IgMb-FITC (horizontal axis) and anti-B220-PE (vertical axis). Left, T and B cell staining of donor B6-Thy1.1 (IgMb) splenocytes. Middle, T and B cell staining of recipient B6.C20 (Thy1.2, IgMa) splenocytes. Right, T and B cell staining of splenocytes from a chimeric mouse made by injecting 3 x 107 B6-Thy1.1 cells into a B6.C20 recipient and harvesting the spleen after 20 h. Donor cells are present in the shaded quadrants.

 
Analysis of B6-Thy1.1 and B6/lpr-Thy1.1 splenic lymphocytes used as donor cells in the short term chimeras

An aliquot of each type of donor cell was set aside for flow cytometry analysis, before injection, and kept at 4°C to evaluate the initial level of apoptosis. Figure 5Go shows that the proportions of live and apoptotic cells, as determined by light scatter characteristics, were identical in all four groups. The data presented here are from a representative of three experiments.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Flow cytometry analysis of splenocytes used as donor cells for chimeric mice. Forward angle vs side scatter profiles were used to identify live and apoptotic lymphocyte populations (top and bottom gates in each histogram, respectively). Pooled splenocytes were maintained at 4°C before analysis.

 
One of the characteristics of lpr mice is the development of lymphadenopathy with increasing age, dominated by CD4-CD8- T cells (16). We looked at T and B cells in mice representative of those used as donor cells and found, despite the presence of the double-negative population in B6/lpr-Thy1.1 mice, the relative proportion of T and B cells was similar to that found in B6-Thy1.1 (data not shown).

In chimeras generated with nonirradiated donor cells, cell recovery was independent of donor and recipient strains

To evaluate the role of Fas/FasL in the clearance of cells from B6 and B6/lpr mice, we compared the recovery of donor B6-Thy1.1 and B6/lpr-Thy1.1 cells from B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld recipient mice. Figure 6GoA shows the recovery of donor B and T cells from short term chimeras made with untreated cells. No significant difference was seen in the comparison of the four groups, for either B cells or T cells (p = 0.76 and p = 0.31, respectively).



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Recovery of B and T cells from short term chimeras. Two-color flow cytometry was used to identify B and T cells of the donor allotype from the spleens of recipient mice 20 h after injection. B6>B6, B6.C20 mice that received B6-Thy1.1 cells; B6>gld, B6.C20/gld mice that received B6-Thy1.1 cells; Lpr>B6, B6.C20 mice that received B6/lpr-Thy1.1 cells; B6>gld, B6.C20/gld mice that received B6/lpr-Thy1.1 cells. Donor B cell recovery was determined by staining chimeric splenocytes with Abs against B220 and IgMb. Donor T cell recovery was determined by staining chimeric splenocytes with Abs against Thy1.1 and Thy1.2. The percentage of donor cells recovered was multiplied by the total number of spleen cells to determine the absolute cell numbers presented here. The results are reported as the arithmetic mean and SE of eight or nine mice per group (combined from three experiments). A, Recovery of untreated cells; B, recovery of {gamma}-irradiated cells; C, recovery of untreated and dexamethasone-treated cells.

 
Recovery of irradiated B6-Thy1.1 and B6-lpr-Thy1.1 cells was greater from B6.C20/gld than B6.C20 mice

Comparison of the recovery of irradiated B6-Thy1.1 donor cells between recipient B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld mice addresses the question of the role of FasL in the removal of cells damaged by {gamma}-irradiation. Figure 6GoB shows the recovery of donor B and T cells from short term chimeras made by injecting {gamma}-irradiated cells. There was a significant increase in the recovery of B cells in B6.C20/gld recipients compared with B6.C20 mice (p = 0.001). The same comparison for T cells was marginally significant (p = 0.09). Comparison of the recovery of irradiated B6/lpr-Thy1.1 donor cells between recipient B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld mice addresses the question of whether the Fas expressed on lpr cells undergoing apoptosis has a role in the removal of cells damaged by {gamma}-irradiation. There was a significant increase in the recovery of infused lpr B cells in B6.C20/gld recipients compared with B6.C20 mice (p = 0.03). The same comparison for T cells was marginally significant (p = 0.08). The observed differences in recovery of B and T cells in chimeras made with irradiated cells were dependent upon whether the recipient strain had a normal FasL molecule. There was no significant difference for B cell recovery when B6.C20 mice were the recipients of B6-Thy1.1 or B6/lpr-Thy1.1 cells (p = 0.86). Similarly, B cell recovery was the same when B6.C20/gld received cells from B6-Thy1.1 or B6/lpr-Thy1.1 (p = 0.26). For T cells, too, recovery was the same from recipient B6.C20 mice given B6-Thy1.1 or B6/lpr-Thy1.1 cells (p = 0.87). Finally, T cell recovery was the same when B6.C20/gld received cells from B6-Thy1.1 or B6/lpr-Thy1.1 (p = 0.88).

B6.C20/gld mice did not have a generalized defect in the clearance of apoptotic cells

Given the observed differences seen in the recovery of apoptotic cells from B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld mice, we wanted to determine whether this difference was specific to Fas/FasL-mediated apoptosis. Apoptosis was induced in splenocytes from B6-Thy1.1 mice by culturing them overnight in the presence of dexamethasone, which induces apoptosis by a Fas-independent mechanism (11). The untreated cells were kept at 4°C to prevent the spontaneous apoptosis that we observed under normal culture conditions (11). Short term chimeras were generated by injecting untreated and dexamethasone-treated cells into B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld mice. Figure 6GoC shows the absolute numbers of donor B cells and T cells recovered from the spleens of recipient mice. There was no significant difference between the recovery of untreated B or T cells from B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld mice (p = 0.75 and p = 0.23, respectively). The recovery of dexamethasone-treated B and T cells was significantly lower than that of the untreated cells (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively), but again there was no difference seen between B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld mice (p = 0.79 and p = 0.46, respectively). The data presented in Figure 6GoC were from a single experiment with three mice per group, which has been repeated once.

Induced apoptosis by in vitro treatment of cells with anti-Fas Ab

To directly test whether the Fas expressed on B6/lpr mice was functional, untreated and irradiated splenocytes were cultured in the presence or absence of an anti-Fas Ab, and the percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis was determined by staining with Annexin V. Figure 7GoA shows that anti-Fas induced apoptosis of both irradiated and untreated B6 cells. Figure 7GoB indicates that B6/lpr cells showed induction of apoptosis in the presence of anti-Fas Ab, both in irradiated and unirradiated cells. The induction of anti-Fas-induced annexin V positivity in untreated cultured B6/lpr cells apparently reflects acquisition of Fas on cells undergoing spontaneous apoptosis. These results are from an experiment in which the splenocytes from three mice were pooled for each strain, and cells from the same pool were used for the four conditions.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Comparison of Annexin V staining following culture in the presence and absence of anti-Fas Ab. Untreated and {gamma}-irradiated splenocytes from 6-mo-old mice were cultured overnight. Cells were stained with fluorescein-conjugated Annexin V, and single-color flow cytometry was used to measure apoptosis. Necrotic cells were excluded from analysis based on forward angle and side scatter characteristics. A, Cells from B6-Thy1.1 mice. B, Cells from B6/lpr-Thy1.1 mice.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have developed an in vivo system to study the role of Fas/FasL in the clearance of injured cells. Short term chimeras were generated by injecting untreated or {gamma}-irradiated splenocytes from B6 or B6/lpr into B6 or B6/gld mice. If Fas-mediated apoptosis were occurring in the recipients, we reasoned that there should be a difference in recovery of donor cells between B6 and B6/gld recipients, as the latter lack functional FasL. Cells subjected to treatment resulting in Fas-mediated apoptosis would thus survive in B6/gld mice, whereas they would be killed in B6 mice. When cells are subjected to treatment resulting in Fas-independent apoptosis (such as dexamethasone-induced apoptosis), donor cell survival in B6 and B6/gld mice should be indistinguishable.

The increased recovery of irradiated B6 B and T cells from B6/gld compared with B6 recipients is compatible with the notion that Fas-mediated apoptosis participates in the disposition of radiation-injured cells in vivo. While recovery of irradiated B6 cells was greater in B6/gld than in B6, survival was not as great as that of untreated B6 cells in B6 or B6/gld, indicating that the presence of host FasL was only partially responsible for the elimination of injured cells. This may reflect the provision of FasL from the infused cells, resulting in autocrine killing. Fratricidal killing by other irradiated cells is less likely, as it would be improbable that transferred cells would be in close proximity in the host. More likely, other mechanisms account for the demise of many of the transferred cells. However, it is likely that FasL expressed on the transferred cells provided some of the signal required to induce apoptosis and subsequent removal of the injured Fas-expressing cells.

It was surprising that Fas could be detected on apoptotic cells from B6/lpr mice. Because Fas expression was seen only on cells undergoing apoptosis, it is not known whether it functions to induce apoptosis or is only detectable once the cell is committed to the apoptotic pathway. Here we have taken an apoptotic pathway that we know is partially mediated by Fas (8) and used our system to test whether the Fas expressed on B6/lpr splenic lymphocytes undergoing apoptosis is functional. When we compared the recovery of irradiated donor B6/lpr cells from recipient B6 and B6/gld mice, we found that the recovery of B6 B and T cells from B6/gld was greater than that from B6 recipients, supporting our hypothesis that the Fas expressed on B6/lpr cells undergoing apoptosis is actually instrumental in that process.

The conventional method for generating chimeric mice includes irradiation of the recipients, before injection, to "make room" for donor cells (17). We found that by irradiating recipient B6.C20 mice, there was a significant depletion of splenocytes, which increased the percentage of donor cells detected. However, the absolute number of donor cells recovered was not increased (data not shown). In addition, B6.C20 and B6.C20/gld mice responded differently to irradiation in that irradiation did not reduce the total number of splenocytes in B6.C20/gld mice (data not shown). For these reasons, recipient mice were not irradiated. The increased in vivo resistance to radiation-induced depletion of spleen cells in gld mice provides further support for a role for Fas/FasL in radiation injury.

Our finding that the recovery of untreated donor cells was independent of whether the donor strain had an intact Fas gene suggested that there was no difference, under these conditions, in homing or trafficking between B6 and B6/lpr splenocytes. The recovery of untreated donor cells was also independent of whether or not the recipient strain was gld homozygous, suggesting that there was not a general difference between B6 and B6/gld mice in terms of their capacity to accept transferred cells.

The evidence provided here that B6/lpr mice express functional Fas, especially on apoptotic cells, is supported by the finding that Fas was expressed on apparent live cells irradiated in the presence of the apoptosis inhibitor zinc acetate. Based on reports that find <10% of the normal level of Fas expression on MRL/lpr thymocytes (18, 19), it is possible that as Fas gene expression is up-regulated following {gamma}-irradiation, the low level normally produced increases, proportionately, to the point where it can be detected. An alternative possibility is that {gamma}-irradiation somehow exerts an effect on the splicing process, resulting in an increased chance of producing a functional Fas protein. Direct evidence that B6/lpr mice express functional Fas protein is provided in the finding that apoptosis is increased when cells from these mice are cultured in the presence of anti-Fas Ab.

The lpr mutation is frequently described as leaky, based on the expression of small amounts of intact Fas mRNA or protein (20). To our knowledge, this is the first report that the leakiness of the lpr mutation results in the expression of functional Fas protein. This result is supported by the finding that the lymphoproliferation and autoimmune disease seen in lpr mice was enhanced and accelerated in Fas knockout mice (20).

This study contributes to the accumulating evidence that lpr is in fact a leaky mutation by providing data suggesting that there is functional Fas in lpr mice capable of transmitting an apoptotic signal. In addition, we have designed an in vivo system demonstrating the importance of Fas/FasL in the disposition of injured cells. This method can be utilized to test the role of Fas/FasL-induced apoptosis in cells subjected to a variety of treatments.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Anne Wolthusen for assisting with the tail vein injections.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grants AR42573, AR33887, and T32-AR07416. E.A.R. is a Fellow of the Arthritis Foundation. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Philip L. Cohen, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, CB 7280, 3330 Thurston Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7280. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: FasL, Fas ligand; TNP, 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl. Back

Received for publication January 6, 1998. Accepted for publication June 24, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Itoh, N., S. Yonehara, A. Ishii, M. Yonehara, S. Mizushima, M. Sameshima, A. Hase, Y. Seto, S. Nagata. 1991. The polypeptide encoded by the cDNA for a human cell surface antigen Fas can mediate apoptosis. Cell 66:233.[Medline]
  2. Adachi, M., R. Watanabe-Fukunaga, S. Nagata. 1993. Aberrant transcription caused by the insertion of an early transposable element in an intron of the Fas antigen gene of lpr mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:1756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Chu, J. L., J. Drappa, A. Parnassa, K. B. Elkon. 1993. The defect in Fas mRNA expression in MRL/lpr mice is associated with insertion of the retrotransposon, ETn. J. Exp. Med. 178:723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wu, J., T. Zhou, J. He, J. D. Mountz. 1993. Autoimmune disease in mice due to integration of an endogenous retrovirus in an apoptosis gene. J. Exp. Med. 178:461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kobayashi, S., T. Hirano, M. Kakinuma, T. Uede. 1993. Transcriptional repression and differential splicing of Fas mRNA by early transposon (ETn) insertion in autoimmune LPR mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 191:617.[Medline]
  6. Watanabe-Fukunaga, R., C. I. Brannan, N. G. Copeland, N. A. Jenkins, S. Nagata. 1992. Lymphoproliferation disorder in mice explained by defects in Fas antigen that mediates apoptosis. Nature 356:314.[Medline]
  7. Takahashi, T., M. Tanaka, C. I. Brannan, N. A. Jenkins, N. G. Copeland, T. Suda, S. Nagata. 1994. Generalized lymphoproliferative disease in mice, caused by a point mutation in the Fas ligand. Cell 76:969.[Medline]
  8. Reap, E. A., K. Roof, K. Maynor, M. Borrero, J. Booker, P. L. Cohen. 1997. Radiation and stress-induced apoptosis: a role for Fas/Fas ligand interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:5750.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Sobel, E. S., P. L. Cohen, R. A. Eisenberg. 1993. Lpr T cells are necessary for autoantibody production in lpr mice. J. Immunol. 150:4160.[Abstract]
  10. Brown, D. G., X.-M. Sun, G. M. Cohen. 1993. Dexamethasone-induced apoptosis involves cleavage of DNA to large fragments prior to internucleosomal fragmentation. J. Biol. Chem. 268:3037.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Reap, E. A., D. Leslie, M. Abrahams, R. A. Eisenberg, P. L. Cohen. 1995. Apoptosis abnormalities of splenic lymphocytes in autoimmune lpr and gld mice. J. Immunol. 154:936.[Abstract]
  12. Illera, V. A., C. E. Perandones, L. L. Stunz, D. A. J. Mower, R. F. Ashman. 1993. Apoptosis in splenic B lymphocytes: regulation by protein kinase C and IL-4. J. Immunol. 151:2965.[Abstract]
  13. SAS Institute, Inc. 1985. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC.
  14. Sokal, R. R., F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
  15. Perry, D. P., M. J. Smyth, H. R. Stennicke, G. S. Salvesen, P. Duriez, G. G. Poirier, Y. A. Hannun. 1997. Zinc is a potent inhibitor of the apoptotic protease, caspase-3. J. Biol. Chem. 272:18530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Cohen, P. L., R. A. Eisenberg. 1991. Lpr and gld: single gene models of systemic autoimmunity and lymphoproliferative disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9:243.[Medline]
  17. Fowlkes, B. J., L. Edison, B. J. Mathieson, T. M. Chused. 1985. Early T lymphocytes: differentiation in vivo of adult intrathymic precursor cells. J. Exp. Med. 162:802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Mariani, S. M., B. Matiba, E. A. Armandola, P. H. Krammer. 1994. The APO-1/Fas (CD95) receptor is expressed in homozygous MRL/lpr mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:3119.[Medline]
  19. Drappa, J., N. Brot, K. B. Elkon. 1993. The Fas protein is expressed at high levels on CD4+CD8+ thymocytes and activated mature lymphocytes in normal mice but not in the lupus-prone strain, MRL lpr/lpr. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Adachi, M., S. Suematsu, T. Suda, D. Watanabe, H. Fukuyama, J. Ogasawara, T. Tanaka, N. Yoshida, S. Nagata. 1996. Enhanced and accelerated lymphoproliferation in Fas-null mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:2131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Villa-Morales, J. Santos, E. Perez-Gomez, M. Quintanilla, and J. Fernandez-Piqueras
A Role for the Fas/FasL System in Modulating Genetic Susceptibility to T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphomas
Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5107 - 5116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Barreiro, R. Schadlu, J. Herndon, H. J. Kaplan, and T. A. Ferguson
The Role of Fas-FasL in the Development and Treatment of Ischemic Retinopathy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 1282 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
P. M. Stuart, F. Pan, S. Plambeck, and T. A. Ferguson
FasL-Fas Interactions Regulate Neovascularization in the Cornea
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2003; 44(1): 93 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
R. M. Licon Luna, E. Lee, A. Mullbacher, R. V. Blanden, R. Langman, and M. Lobigs
Lack of both Fas Ligand and Perforin Protects from Flavivirus-Mediated Encephalitis in Mice
J. Virol., March 7, 2002; 76(7): 3202 - 3211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. d. C. Bittencourt, S. Perruche, E. Contassot, S. Fresnay, M.-H. Baron, R. Angonin, F. Aubin, P. Herve, P. Tiberghien, and P. Saas
Intravenous injection of apoptotic leukocytes enhances bone marrow engraftment across major histocompatibility barriers
Blood, July 1, 2001; 98(1): 224 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H.-C. Hsu, L. D. Shultz, X. Su, J. Shi, P.-A. Yang, M. J. Relyea, H.-G. Zhang, and J. D. Mountz
Mutation of the Hematopoietic Cell Phosphatase (Hcph) Gene Is Associated with Resistance to {{gamma}}-Irradiation-Induced Apoptosis in Src Homology Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase (SHP)-1-Deficient ""Motheaten"" Mutant Mice
J. Immunol., January 15, 2001; 166(2): 772 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J.-T. Jan, B.-H. Chen, S.-H. Ma, C.-I Liu, H.-P. Tsai, H.-C. Wu, S.-Y. Jiang, K.-D. Yang, and M.-F. Shaio
Potential Dengue Virus-Triggered Apoptotic Pathway in Human Neuroblastoma Cells: Arachidonic Acid, Superoxide Anion, and NF-kappa B Are Sequentially Involved
J. Virol., September 15, 2000; 74(18): 8680 - 8691.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Ortiz, C. Lorz, and J. Egido
The Fas ligand/Fas system in renal injury
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 1999; 14(8): 1831 - 1834.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Brochu, B. Rioux-Masse, J. Roy, D.-C. Roy, and C. Perreault
Massive Activation-Induced Cell Death of Alloreactive T Cells With Apoptosis of Bystander Postthymic T Cells Prevents Immune Reconstitution in Mice With Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Blood, July 15, 1999; 94(2): 390 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
L. L. Hill, V. K. Shreedhar, M. L. Kripke, and L. B. Owen-Schaub
A Critical Role for Fas Ligand in the Active Suppression of Systemic Immune Responses by Ultraviolet Radiation
J. Exp. Med., April 19, 1999; 189(8): 1285 - 1294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Booker, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Booker, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, P. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS