The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrizosa, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchroo, V. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carrizosa, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchroo, V. K.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 161: 3307-3314.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Expansion by Self Antigen Is Necessary for the Induction of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis by T Cells Primed with a Cross-Reactive Environmental Antigen1

Ana M. Carrizosa*, Lindsay B. Nicholson*, Michael Farzan{dagger}, Scott Southwood{ddagger}, Alessandro Sette{ddagger}, Raymond A. Sobel§ and Vijay K. Kuchroo2,*

* Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; {dagger} Division of Human Retrovirology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; {ddagger} Epimmune, San Diego, CA 92121; § Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, and Veteran’s Administration Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cross-reactivity with environmental antigens has been postulated as a mechanism responsible for the induction of autoimmune disease. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis is a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease model inducible in susceptible strains of laboratory animals by immunization with protein constituents of myelin. We used myelin proteolipid protein (PLP) peptide 139–151 and its analogues to define motifs to search a protein database for structural homologues of PLP139–151 and identified five peptides derived from microbial Ags that elicit immune responses that cross-react with this self peptide. Exposure of naive SJL mice to the cross-reactive environmental peptides alone was insufficient to induce autoimmune disease even when animals were treated with Ag-nonspecific stimuli (superantigen or LPS). However, immunization of SJL mice with suboptimal doses of PLP139–151 after priming with cross-reactive environmental peptides consistently induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Furthermore, T cell lines from mice immunized with cross-reactive environmental peptides and restimulated in vitro with PLP139–151 could induce disease upon transfer into naive recipients. These data suggest that expansion by self Ag is required to break the threshold to autoimmune disease in animals primed with cross-reactive peptides.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)3 is a model of a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that shares both clinical and histologic features with multiple sclerosis (1). EAE is inducible in experimental animals by immunization with protein constituents of CNS myelin, such as myelin basic protein (MBP) and proteolipid protein (PLP), or by adoptive transfer of CD4+ T cells specific for these proteins (2, 3). Activated T cells specific for both MBP and PLP have been found at a higher frequency in patients with multiple sclerosis than in healthy individuals (4). Nevertheless, the events leading to the activation and expansion of myelin-reactive T cells and their role in the induction of autoimmune disease remain unknown. Indirect evidence based on clinical and epidemiologic data suggest that exposure to environmental agents may play a role in the development of autoimmune disease, and genetic studies point to a significant environmental component (5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Nevertheless, the mechanism by which environmental agents influence the development of autoimmune disease has not been established. At least two models of how environmental agents may play a role in the development of CNS autoimmune disease have been described in the literature. The first model proposes that an infectious agent with tropism for the CNS produces an inflammatory response that damages CNS myelin and results in the release of myelin Ags. The myelin Ags activate and expand autoreactive cells in the periphery, and the autoreactive cells infiltrate into the CNS, resulting in inflammation and subsequent demyelination. Indeed, recent data in mice illustrate how viral infection in the CNS may lead to chronic disease, presumably due to an autoimmune response to released myelin Ags (10). The second model is the molecular mimicry model (11). This model proposes that an immune response generated against environmental agents may cross-react with self Ags with shared sequence or structural homologies, ultimately resulting in tissue damage and autoimmune disease.

In support of the molecular mimicry model, peptides derived from measles, influenza, adenovirus, and EBV that share linear sequence homology to MBP have been identified (12). Furthermore, immunization of rabbits with a peptide derived from the hepatitis B viral polymerase, shown to have linear sequence homology with MBP, resulted in CNS inflammation but not clinical EAE (13). More recently, microbial peptides that share structural homology with an epitope of MBP (MBP84–102) were identified using motifs to search a protein database. Some of these peptides were then shown to activate human MBP84–102-specific T cell clones in vitro (14). Peptides that activate a human MBP-specific T cell clone have also been identified using a random peptide library approach (15).

Although it has been shown for B cell-mediated autoimmune disease that immunization of animals with streptococcal membrane Ags alone results in autoimmune myocarditis (16), it has not been conclusively shown for T cell-mediated autoimmune disease that immunization with cross-reactive Ags alone can induce clinical disease. To investigate the potential role of cross-reactive environmental Ags in the development of autoimmune disease, we performed a detailed analysis of the structural requirements for TCR recognition and MHC binding of PLP139–151, an encephalitogenic epitope of myelin proteolipid protein that induces severe EAE in SJL (H-2s) mice. Based on this analysis, we created motifs to search the SwissProt database for natural analogues of PLP139–151 and identified several bacterial and viral peptides that elicit immune responses that cross-react with PLP139–151. None of these peptides was able to induce clinical autoimmune disease in SJL mice on their own. However, immunization with one viral peptide predisposed mice for the development of EAE following active immunization with a suboptimal dose of PLP139–151. These results suggest that the induction of autoimmune disease via the mechanism of molecular mimicry may require a more complex series of events than previously postulated.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

Female SJL/J mice (4–6 wk) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and housed under VAF conditions. They were maintained in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Animals of Harvard Medical School.

Ags

PLP139–151 (HSLGKWLGHPDKF), PLP139–151 altered peptides, and neuraminidase101–120 (NASE101–120; EALVRQGLAKVAYVYKPNNT) were synthesized by Dr. R. Laursen on a Milligen model 9050 synthesizer using F-moc chemistry. Natural analogues of PLP139–151 and pigeon cytochrome c88–104 (ADLIAYLKQATAK) were synthesized by Quality Controlled Biochemicals (Hopkinton, MA). Peptide purity was determined by HPLC, and peptide identity was confirmed by mass spectroscopy.

Culture media

T cell hybridomas (2) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with sodium pyruvate (1 mM), HEPES (1 mM), L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 U/ml), gentamicin sulfate (0.1 mg/ml; BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD), and 5% FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT). HT-2 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with sodium pyruvate, L-glutamine, penicillin, streptomycin, gentamicin sulfate, nonessential amino acids (0.1 mM), MEM essential vitamin mixture (1x; BioWhittaker), asparagine (0.1 mM), folic acid (0.1 mg/ml), 2-ME (5 x 10-5 M; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 10% FBS (HyClone), and 10% T cell growth factor (T-stim, Collaborative Biomedical Products, Bedford, MA). Lymph node cells (LNC) were cultured in DMEM (as described above) without FBS.

Induction and assessment of EAE

Mice preimmunized with natural PLP analogues or control peptides (detailed in Results) received 100 µg of peptide emulsified in CFA (Difco, Detroit, MI) supplemented with Mycobaterium tuberculosis H37RA (400 µg/mouse; Difco) s.c. in the flanks. Mice were then challenged 2 to 4 wk later by injection with 100 µg of the relevant peptide emulsified in CFA supplemented with M. tuberculosis H37RA s.c. in the flanks. In the case of the challenge with PLP139–151, three different batches of peptide were used. Each batch was titrated to determine an optimal and a suboptimal dose (batch AI: suboptimal dose, 10 µg; optimal dose, 50–100 µg; batch CP40: suboptimal dose, 25 µg; optimal dose, 50–100 µg; batch CP114: suboptimal dose, 100 µg; optimal dose, >200 µg). On days 0 and 3, mice received 100 ng of pertussis toxin (List, Campbell, CA) or 109 heat-killed Bordetella pertussis bacilli (pertussis vaccine lot 285, Massachusetts Public Health Biologic Laboratories, Boston, MA) i.v. Mice preimmunized with PLP139–151 received 5 µg of peptide (batch QCB: optimal dose, 50–75 µg) emulsified in CFA supplemented with M. tuberculosis H37RA s.c. in the flanks. Mice were then challenged 2 wk later with 100 µg of natural PLP analogues or control peptides in CFA supplemented with M. tuberculosis H37RA s.c. in the flanks. On days 0 and 3, mice received 50 to 100 ng of pertussis toxin as described above. For the superantigen experiments, mice preimmunized with natural PLP analogues or control peptides received 40 µg of enterotoxin (SEA or SEB; Toxin Technology, Sarasota, FL) i.p. in PBS on day 14 along with 100 ng of pertussis toxin i.v. on days 0 and 3. For the LPS experiments, mice preimmunized with natural PLP analogues or control peptides received 50 µg of LPS (Sigma) i.p. in PBS on day 14. All mice were examined daily beginning on day 9 for disease, which was assessed clinically according to the following criteria: 0, no disease; 1, limp tail; 2, hindlimb weakness; 3, hindlimb paralysis; 4, hindlimb plus forelimb paralysis; and 5, moribund or dead. When animals were moribund or at the end of the experiment (generally day 30), they were sacrificed, and brains and spinal cords were fixed in 10% formalin, processed for histologic analysis, and evaluated as previously described (17).

Adoptive transfer of EAE

Mice were immunized s.c. at five sites with 100 µg of HAE, MHV, or PLP139–151 emulsified in CFA (Difco) containing a total of 250 µg of M. tuberculosis H37RA. Draining lymph nodes were harvested 10 days later. LNCs were cultured at 5 x 106/well in 24-well plates in the presence of HAE (20 µg), MHV (10 µg), or PLP139–151 (20 µg) for 4 days, then harvested and purified over a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient. Cells were resuspended in PBS at 108/ml and injected i.v. into mice (0.1 ml, 107/mouse). Recipient mice also received 100 ng of pertussis toxin (List) i.v. on days 0 and 3.

In vitro proliferation assays

Activation of T cell hybridomas. T cell hybridomas (5 x 104) were cultured in triplicate in 96-well round-bottom plates with 5 x 105 irradiated SJL spleen cells and various concentrations of Ag in a final volume of 0.2 ml. After 24 h, 0.1 ml of supernatant was transferred to 96-well flat-bottom plates, and the IL-2/IL-4-dependent HT-2 cell line was added at 104 cell/well. After 16 h, the cells were pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine/well. Plates were harvested 6 h later. [3H]thymidine incorporation was determined in a Wallac scintillation counter (model 1250, Gaithersburg, MD).

LNC proliferation. Mice were immunized s.c. at five sites with 100 µg of Ag emulsified in CFA (Difco) containing a total of 250 µg of M. tuberculosis H37RA. Draining lymph nodes were harvested 10 days later. LNCs (4 x 105/well) were cultured in triplicate in 96-well round-bottom plates in the presence of various concentrations of peptide for 48 h and pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine for the last 16 h. [3H]thymidine incorporation was determined as described above.

In vitro cytokine assays

Supernatants were collected from LNCs 40 h after activation in vitro. The concentrations of IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-{gamma}, and TNF-{alpha} were measured by quantitative capture ELISA according to the guidelines of the manufacturers. In brief, purified rat mAb to mouse IL-2 (clone JES6-1A12), IL-4 (clone BVD4-1D11), IL-10 (clone JES5-2A5), IFN-{gamma} (clone R4-6A2), and TNF-{alpha} (clone MP6-XT22) were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA) and were used to coat ELISA plates (Immulon 4, Dynatech, Chantilly, VA). Recombinant mouse cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-{gamma}, and TNF-{alpha}; PharMingen) were used to construct standard curves, and biotinylated rat mAb to mouse IL-2 (clone JES6-5H4), IL-4 (clone BVD6-24G2), IL-10 (clone SXC-1), and IFN-{gamma} (clone XMG1.2; PharMingen) were used as the second Ab. Detection of TNF-{alpha} was performed with biotinylated polyclonal rabbit IgG (PharMingen). Plates were developed with TMB microwell peroxidase substrate (Kirkegaard and Perry, Gaithersburg, MD) and read after the addition of stop solution at 450 nm using a model 3550 microplate Reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

IAs binding assay

Purified IAs molecules (~5–10 nM) were incubated with 5 nM 125I-radiolabeled peptide ROIV (YAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAA) (18) for 48 h in PBS, which contained 5% DMSO and 0.5% Nonidet P-40 in the presence of PMSF (1 mM), 1,10-phenanthroline (1.3 mM), pepstatin A (73 µM), EDTA (8 mM), N-ethylmalemide (6 mM), and Na-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone (200 µM). IAs peptide complexes were separated from free peptide by gel filtration on Sephadex G-50 or TSK columns. To test the binding of PLP139–151 analogues, analogues were added to a mixture of IAs molecules and radiolabeled standard peptide before incubation. Analogs typically were tested at concentrations ranging from 1.2 to 120 ng/ml. The concentration yielding 50% inhibition (IC50) of binding of the radiolabeled peptide was measured by plotting the percentage of inhibition vs the concentration of analogue.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Functional anatomy of the PLP139–151/IAs determinant

Our previous studies using a panel of altered peptides bearing alanine or conservative substitutions at each residue of the PLP139–151 peptide (HSLGKWLGHPDKF) allowed the assignment of W144 as the primary TCR contact residue, and L141 and H147 as the secondary TCR contact residues for a panel of five PLP139–151-specific T cell clones/hybridomas (2E5, 4E3, 5B6, 7A5, and SPL1.1) (19). Direct IAs binding and blocking studies using the same panel of altered peptides allowed the assignment of L145 and P148 as MHC binding residues (19). To determine the degree of variability that could be accommodated at each position along this peptide determinant, altered peptides bearing various amino acid substitutions of the peptide core (residues 141–148) were synthesized and tested for their ability to activate the panel of five T cell hybridomas. The data from the 4E3, 5B6, and 7A5 hybridomas are shown, since they represent the three different patterns of reactivity that were observed (Table IGo). The 5B6 hybridoma did not tolerate any of the substitutions tested at residue 141. Likewise, the 7A5 hybridoma did not tolerate any substitutions at residue 147. All three hybridomas tolerated to varying degrees substitutions at residues 142, 143, 145, and 148. Substitutions at residue 144 were not tolerated by any of the hybridomas tested with the exception of P144 and Y144, which stimulated 5B6, and Q144, which stimulated 7A5. At residue 146, the conservative substitution of alanine for glycine was stimulatory for all three hybridomas, whereas the conservative substitution of valine for glycine was not tolerated. This suggests that substitution of the glycine at residue 146 affects recognition of the peptide either directly or indirectly by affecting the overall conformation of the peptide in the MHC binding groove. Interestingly, some of the substitutions tested were heteroclitic compared with the native determinant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Ability of altered peptides to bind MHC and activate PLP139–151-specific T cell hybridomas1

 
To determine the effects of these substitutions on MHC/peptide interactions, binding assays to purified IAs were performed (Table IGo). Most substitutions, with the exception of A141, K141, A145, A147, and K147, exhibited decreased binding compared with that of native PLP139–151. The poor binding of all nonalanine substitutions at residue 148 substantiates the assignment of this residue as an MHC binding residue. Furthermore, the poor binding exhibited by some of the substitutions at residues 142 and 143 suggests that the residues at these positions may play a role either directly or indirectly in binding to the MHC.

Identification of natural analogues of PLP139–151

Based on the patterns of activating and nonactivating substitutions and the MHC binding data, three motifs were created for the 4E3, 5B6, and 7A5 T cell hybridomas to search for peptides bearing structural homology to PLP139–151 (Fig. 1Go) in the SwissProt database using Genetics Computer Group Software. Substituted peptides were scored as activating if the proliferation observed was >20% of the proliferation observed with native Ag. Substituted peptides that were similar in charge, size, or chemical nature to activating substitutions were included in the motifs. At positions where all the substitutions tested were activating, no restriction was placed. These motifs were then used to search the SwissProt database for peptide sequences bearing structural homology to PLP139–151. The 4E3, 5B6, and 7A5 motifs yielded 737, 1839, and 27 positives, respectively. From the 2603 sequences, 33 sequences were chosen for further study (Table IIGo). These sequences were chosen by two criteria: the degree of sequence similarity to PLP139–151 and their origin, i.e., known pathogens or self peptides. Of the 33 sequences, 10 were identified using the 4E3 motif, and 23 were identified using the 5B6 motif.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Motifs used to search for natural analogues of PLP139–151. Motifs were based on the patterns of reactivity of the 4E3, 5B6, and 7A5 T cell hybridomas to PLP139–151-altered peptides. Underlined residues were tested and scored as positive. The remaining residues were included due to their similarity in size or chemical nature to the residues tested as positive. These motifs were used to search the SwissProt database using Genetics Computer Group software (program: findpatterns). The 4E3, 5B6, and 7A5 motifs yielded 737, 1839, and 27 sequences, respectively.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. MHC binding affinity and T cell responses of natural PLP139–151 analogs1

 
Natural analogues of PLP139–151 elicit cross-reactive immune responses

First, the 33 peptides were tested for the ability to activate the panel of PLP139–151-specific T cell hybridomas. None of the 33 peptides was stimulatory for the panel of five PLP139–151-specific T cell hybridomas (data not shown). The peptides were then tested for the ability to immunize SJL (IAs) mice. Five peptides, from murine hepatitis virus (MHV), Haemophilus influenzae (HAE), Escherichia coli (ECO-1), Salmonella typhimurium (SAL), and Candida albicans (CAN), were able to elicit lymph node responses that cross-reacted with PLP139–151, in that LNC from mice immunized with these analogue peptides also reacted to PLP139–151 in vitro (Table IIGo). Of these five, MHV and HAE gave the most potent cross-reactive immune responses. To further analyze the cross-reactive T cell responses induced by these peptides, a detailed dose-response analysis was undertaken. The data presented in Figure 2Go confirm that immunization with MHV and HAE can induce T cells that cross-react with PLP139–151. Moreover, cross-reactivity to HAE was seen in the LNC of mice immunized with PLP139–151, suggesting that the T cell repertoires that respond to HAE and PLP139–151 overlap (Fig. 2Go). Thus, we chose to focus on these two peptides for the rest of our study.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Natural analogues of PLP139–151 can prime autoreactive T cell responses. A, SJL mice were immunized with 100 µg of MHV, HAE, or TMEV-2 peptides in CFA. LNCs were harvested 10 days after immunization and tested for reactivity to the immunizing peptide and PLP139–151 over a dose response of 0.1 to 100 µg/ml of peptide. Activation of LNCs to a control Ag (NASE) was tested at a single dose of peptide (100 µg/ml). B, Immune responses to natural PLP139–151 analogues are present in PLP139–151-immunized mice. SJL mice were immunized with 100 µg of PLP139–151 in CFA. LNCs were harvested 10 days after immunization and tested for reactivity to PLP139–151, MHV, and HAE over a dose response of 0.1 to 100 µg/ml of peptide. Activation of LNCs to a control Ag (NASE) was tested at a single dose of peptide (100 µg/ml).

 
Analysis of the cytokines produced by the LNC of mice immunized with MHV revealed the production of IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} in response to both MHV and PLP139–151. HAE-immunized LNC made IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} in response to HAE, but made only IL-2 in response to PLP139–151. PLP139–151-immunized lymph nodes made IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} in response to both PLP139–151 and HAE (Table IIIGo). The response to MHV in these cells may be too low to detect any Ag-specific cytokine. The cytokine production of LNC from mice immunized with an epitope of Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV-2) that was identified in our search is shown as a control. Since Th1 T cells have been shown to be autopathogenic, the production of Th1 cytokines by MHV- and HAE-immunized LNC that cross-react with PLP139–151 suggested that these cells have the potential to be encephalitogenic.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Cytokine production of lymph node cells from mice immunized with PLP139–151 and peptide analogs1

 
Comparison of natural analogue sequences to PLP139–151

The five analogues (MHV, HAE, ECO-1, SAL, and CAN) that induced immune responses cross-reactive with PLP139–151 varied in their degree of linear sequence homology to PLP139–151. HAE had the highest degree of linear sequence homology, with six residues in common with PLP139–151; ECO-1 and SAL had four residues in common; and MHV and CAN had three residues in common. All the analogues except CAN had a tryptophan in the center of the peptide sequence. As the tryptophan in the center of the PLP139–151 sequence is used as the primary TCR contact residue for PLP139–151-specific T cells, it is likely that the tryptophan in the center of the analogue peptide sequences is used as the primary TCR contact residue by T cells that recognize the analogue peptides and cross-react with PLP139–151. Interestingly, the most notable feature of both the MHV and HAE sequences is that they share a stretch of three residues (KWL) in the center of the peptide with PLP139–151. This may explain in part why MHV and HAE produced the most potent PLP139–151 cross-reactive immune responses.

The five analogue sequences also varied widely in their binding to IAs (Table IIGo). In fact, some of the analogues that failed to elicit a PLP139–151 cross-reactive immune response bound to the MHC more strongly than the five analogues that gave positive results. Thus, there appears to be no strong correlation between the MHC binding affinity and the ability to induce a cross-reactive immune response.

In vivo effects of exposure to natural analogues of PLP139–151

To test whether MHV and HAE peptides could induce EAE, we immunized SJL mice with these peptides and observed them for the development of EAE for a period of 30 to 60 days. Immunization with MHV or HAE in CFA with pertussis toxin did not induce clinical or histologic EAE (Table IVGo). As superantigens have been postulated to play a role in triggering autoimmune disease (20, 21) and have been shown to trigger relapses of EAE (22, 23), we postulated that two independent events, immunization with a cross-reactive peptide followed by expansion by superantigen, may induce EAE. Mice were immunized with either MHV or HAE and were challenged 2 wk later with SEA or SEB. None of the mice in these groups developed clinical disease. A few mice in the MHV group treated with SEA or SEB had low numbers of inflammatory lesions in the CNS. As LPS has been shown to promote a proinflammatory milieu and viral penetration of the CNS (24), we immunized mice with either MHV or HAE and challenged them 2 wk later with a dose of LPS. None of the mice in these groups exhibited either clinical or histologic disease. Thus, nonspecific immune system-activating events following exposure to cross-reactive peptides were not able to trigger autoimmune disease in mice primed with MHV or HAE.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Immunization with natural PLP139–151 analogs for the induction of EAE1

 
Next, we tested the possibility that serial exposure to multiple environmental Ags might lower the threshold for the induction of autoimmune disease by increasing the frequency of cells that cross-react with autoantigen. To address this, we immunized mice with HAE, followed by an immunization with MHV 2 wk later. None of these mice developed clinical disease. We then tested whether immunization with either MHV or HAE could enhance either the susceptibility of mice to EAE or the severity of the disease. We preimmunized mice with either MHV or HAE and challenged them 21 to 30 days later with a suboptimal dose of PLP139–151. Mice that were preimmunized with MHV developed clinical EAE after a challenge with a suboptimal dose of PLP139–151 (Table IVGo). The incidence of EAE in the MHV-preimmunized mice (13 of 20) was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that in mice that received a preimmunization with either of two different IAs binding control peptides, NASE101–120 or pigeon cytochrome c88–104 (4 of 18). We also preimmunized mice with an equivalent concentration of PLP139–151. In this group, 40% of the animals (6 of 15) developed clinical disease by day 21. These mice were not challenged with a suboptimal dose of PLP139–151. Although preimmunization with MHV increased disease incidence, it did not accelerate the day of disease onset or enhance the severity of clinical disease in mice that did develop disease. These mice also showed large numbers of inflammatory foci in the CNS, confirming the presence of typical EAE (Table IVGo). Four of eight HAE-preimmunized mice also developed EAE, although this incidence is not significantly different compared with that in controls.

To elucidate the mechanism further, we established short term T cell lines from mice immunized with MHV, HAE, or PLP139–151. LNCs from mice immunized with MHV were activated with MHV or PLP139–151, LNCs from mice immunized with HAE were activated with HAE or PLP139–151, and LNCs from mice immunized with PLP139–151 were activated with PLP139–151. After 4 days in culture, T cell blasts were harvested and transferred into naive mice. Mice that received T cells from MHV- or HAE-primed mice and activated in vitro with PLP139–151 developed clinical EAE (Fig. 3Go), whereas the mice that received T cells activated in vitro with the natural analogue peptides did not develop disease. This demonstrates that both in vivo and in vitro, expansion of MHV- or HAE-specific T cells by PLP139–151 can induce EAE.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. T cell lines from mice primed with natural analogues of PLP139–151 adoptively transfer EAE. SJL mice were immunized with 100 µg of MHV, HAE, or PLP139–151. LNCs were harvested and activated in vitro with MHV, HAE, or PLP139–151 as indicated. Live cells were purified 4 days after activation by Ficoll-Hypaque centrifugation, resuspended in PBS, and transferred into naive mice as described. The mean disease score over a 30-day period is shown.

 
We also tested the ability of MHV and HAE to trigger EAE in mice with a pre-expanded pool of PLP139–151-reactive cells. We immunized mice with a low dose of PLP139–151 and monitored them for 2 wk for any sign of disease. After 2 wk, all the mice were normal. At this time, they were challenged with either MHV or HAE. The incidence of disease in the MHV- and HAE-treated groups was low and was not significantly different from that in controls (Table IVGo). Taken together the in vivo data suggest that although cross-reactive Ags cannot induce EAE on their own, prior exposure to a cross-reactive Ag can lower the threshold for induction of EAE by autoantigenic peptides.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have examined the role of T cell cross-reactivity between environmental Ags and self Ags in the induction of autoreactive T cell responses and in the development of autoimmune disease. By performing a detailed structural analysis of a murine autoantigen, PLP139–151, we were able to generate motifs that, when used to search the SwissProt database, identified 2603 peptides that share some structural homology with PLP139–151. We analyzed 33 sequences representing known pathogens or self peptides. Five of them (15%) elicited primary immune responses cross-reactive with PLP139–151 in vitro. Interestingly, none of these peptides activated the T cell hybridomas used to generate the search motifs. This is in contrast with the results of a similar study by Wucherpfennig and Strominger, in which search motifs identified several peptides that activated the MBP-specific T cell clones used to generate the search motifs (14). We analyzed only 1.3% of the sequences identified by our motifs. Thus, it is possible that some sequences capable of activating the T cell hybridomas used to generate the motifs in our study could still be found among the remaining sequences.

None of the cross-reactive peptides we studied was able to induce EAE on their own, suggesting that the activation and expansion of the cross-reactive repertoire do not necessarily result in a disease-inducing repertoire. This finding argues against a simple molecular mimicry model of autoimmune disease and emphasizes that cross-reactivity with the autoantigen and the ability to produce Th1 cytokines may not be sufficient to break self tolerance and induce autoimmunity.

Furthermore, Ag nonspecific stimulation by the administration of superantigens was insufficient to induce disease in MHV- and HAE-primed mice. Because the cross-reactive T cells in these mice express multiple different Vß genes (data not shown), superantigen may not expand the appropriate Vß-expressing T cell subset required for disease to ensue. Similarly, treatment with LPS did not induce disease in MHV- and HAE-primed mice. This suggests that the inflammatory milieu that results from peripheral exposure to LPS does not render MHV- and HAE-reactive T cells encephalitogenic.

We were able to observe clinical and histologic disease in mice that had been primed with MHV and then treated with a suboptimal dose of PLP139–151. This raises an important issue: that the selective expansion of pathogenic autoantigen-specific T cells from a cross-reactive T cell repertoire may be essential to break the threshold for induction of autoimmune disease. The transfer of disease by cells from mice immunized with MHV or HAE and restimulated in vitro with PLP139–151 (Fig. 3Go) confirms that T cells are sufficient to mediate disease. It also strongly supports the conclusion that selective expansion of cells that are cross-reactive with PLP139–151 is necessary for the induction of disease. Furthermore, although the increase in disease we observed in HAE-preimmunized mice was not statistically significant, the EAE observed in the mice that received HAE-primed T cells reactivated with PLP139–151 suggests that HAE does lower the threshold for the induction of autoimmune disease.

Although infection with neurotropic agents and molecular mimicry are the two proposed mechanisms by which environmental agents can induce EAE, our data raise a third possibility. First, exposure to an environmental Ag bearing structural homology to self primes and expands a T cell repertoire cross-reactive with self. No autoimmune disease may develop due to either low frequency of cells that are cross-reactive with self in the initial pool of responding T cells or to regulatory mechanisms that keep autoaggressive responses in check. However, a second event that specifically expands the self-reactive cells from this initial pool allows the cross-reactive T cells to induce clinical disease. This second event could be one that leads to tissue damage, thereby releasing autoantigen, or one that allows for extravasation of cross-reactive cells into the target organ. One can envision multiple different scenarios that would fit this model. For example, an infection with a neurotropic pathogen that expresses peptides that bear structural homology to self primes a cross-reactive T cell repertoire. Subsequent damage to myelin results in the release of self Ag that selectively expands autoreactive cells from this cross-reactive T cell repertoire. This would result in the establishment of a chronic autoimmune neuroinflammatory disease. A second scenario involves exposure to any environmental agent that bears structural homology to self, resulting in a primed cross-reactive T cell repertoire. Subsequent infection with a neurotropic agent that damages myelin and allows the release of self Ag into the periphery then selectively expands the self-reactive cells from the previously primed cross-reactive T cell repertoire. The pathogens responsible for priming cross-reactive T cell responses may be different from the pathogen responsible for releasing self Ag depending on the MHC haplotype and the T cell repertoire of a given individual. This is consistent with the lack of a strong correlation between any single pathogen and multiple sclerosis etiopathogenesis.

We cannot exclude the possibility that the present study may have failed to identify a ligand that when used alone would be sufficient to induce autoimmune disease, but given the increasing data supporting plasticity in the autoreactive T cell repertoire (14, 15) autoimmune disease would be much more prevalent if cross-reaction with self alone was sufficient to cause disease. Due to their cross-reactivity with self Ag and production of proinflammatory cytokines, it would be predicted that cross-reactive environmental Ags would induce disease, which is not the case. This raises an important issue that activation and expansion of a cross-reactive T cell repertoire are not sufficient to induce autoimmune disease. In conclusion, our data support a role for environmental Ags in predisposing toward autoimmune disease and suggest that infectious agents that affect target organs may induce autoimmune disease by releasing self Ag that then selectively expands autoreactive T cells from a pre-existing or expanded cross-reactive T cell repertoire.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01NS30843, NS26773, R01NS35685, and P01AI39671-01A1) and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, New York (RG2571 and RG2320). L.B.N. is a postdoctoral fellow of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, and A.M.C. is a predoctoral fellow of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Vijay K. Kuchroo, Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 77 Louis Pasteur Ave., Boston, MA 02115. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; PLP, proteolipid protein; CNS, central nervous system; MBP, myelin basic protein; NASE, neuraminidase; LNC, lymph node cells; IC50, 50% inhibiting concentration; SEA, staphylococcal enterotoxin A; SEB, staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Back

Received for publication February 6, 1998. Accepted for publication May 29, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jr Alvord E. C., and M. W. Kies, and A. J. Suckling, eds. Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis: A Useful Model for Multiple Sclerosis 1984 Alan R. Liss, New York.
  2. Zamvil, S. S., P. Nelson, J. Rotter, D. Mitchell, R. Knobler, R. Fritz, L. Steinman. 1985. T cell clones specific for myelin basic protein induce chronic relapsing paralysis and demyelination. Nature 317:355.[Medline]
  3. Kuchroo, V. K., R. A. Sobel, J. C. Laning, C. A. Martin, E. Greenfield, M. E. Dorf, M. B. Lees. 1992. Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis mediated by cloned T cells specific for a synthetic peptide of myelin proteolipid protein. J. Immunol. 148:3776.[Abstract]
  4. Zhang, J. S., S. Markovic-Plese, B. Lacet, J. Raus, H. L. Weiner, D. A. Hafler. 1994. Increased frequency of IL-2 responsive T cells specific for myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein in peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Exp. Med. 179:973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Johnson, R. T., D. E. Griffin, J. S. Hirsch, J. S. Wolinsky, S. Rodenbeck, I. Lindo De Soriano, A. Vaisberg. 1984. Measles and encephalomyelitis: clinical and immunological studies. N. Engl. J. Med. 310:137.[Abstract]
  6. Kurtzke, J.. 1985. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. P. J. Vinken, and G. W. Bruyn, and H. L. Klawans, and J. C. Koetsier, eds. Handbook of Clinical Neurology 259. Elsevier Science Publishing, New York.
  7. Ray, C. G., J. P. Palmer, J. R. Crossley, R. H. Williams. 1980. Coxsackie B virus antibody responses in juvenile-onset diabetes mellitus. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 12:375.[Medline]
  8. Rose, N. R., L. J. Wolfgram, A. Herskowitz, K. W. Beisel. 1986. Postinfectious autoimmunity: two distinct phases of coxsackie B3-induced myocarditis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 475:146.[Medline]
  9. Ebers, G. C.. 1996. Genetic epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 9:155.[Medline]
  10. Miller, S. D., C. L. Vanderlugt, W. Begolka Smith, W. Pao, R. L. Yauch, K. L. Neville, Y. Katz-Levy, A. Carrizosa, B. S. Kim. 1997. Persistent infection with Theiler’s virus leads to CNS autoimmunity via epitope spreading. Nat. Med. 3:1333.
  11. Oldstone, M. B. A.. 1990. Molecular mimicry and autoimmune disease. Cell 50:819.
  12. Jahnke, U., E. H. Fischer, Jr E. C. Alvord. 1985. Sequence homology between certain viral proteins and proteins related to encephalomyelitis and neuritis. Science. 229:282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fujinami, R. S., M. B. Oldstone. 1985. Amino acid homology between the encephalitogenic site of myelin basic protein and virus: mechanism for autoimmunity. Science 230:1043.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Wucherpfennig, K. W., J. L. Strominger. 1995. Molecular mimicry in T cell-mediated autoimmunity: viral peptides activate human T cell clones specific for myelin basic protein. Cell 80:695.[Medline]
  15. Hemmer, B., B. T. Fleckenstein, M. Vergelli, G. Jung, H. McFarland, R. Martin, K. Wiesmuller. 1997. Identification of high potency microbial and self ligands for a human autoreactive class II-restricted T cell clone. J. Exp. Med. 185:1651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Anand, I. S., N. K. Ganguly, A. K. Khanna, R. N. Chakravarti, P. L. Wahi. 1984. Humoral immunity in experimental immune carditis. Pathology 16:291.[Medline]
  17. Sobel, R. A., V. K. Tuohy, Z. Lu, R. Laursen, M. B. Lees. 1989. Acute allergic encephalomyelitis in SJL/J mice induced by a synthetic peptide of myelin proteolipid protein. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 49:468.
  18. Sette, A., J. Sidney, M. Albertson, C. Miles, S. M. Colon, T. Pedrazzini, A. G. Lamont, H. M. Grey. 1990. A novel approach to the generation of high affinity class II-binding peptides. J. Immunol. 145:1809.[Abstract]
  19. Kuchroo, V. K., J. M. Greer, D. Kaul, G. Ishioka, A. Franco, A. Sette, R. A. Sobel, M. B. Lees. 1994. A single TCR antagonist peptide inhibits experimental allergic encephalomyelitis mediated by a diverse T cell repertoire. J. Immunol. 153:3326.[Abstract]
  20. Conrad, B., E. Weidmann, G. Trucco, W. A. Rudert, R. Behboo, C. Ricordi, H. Rodriguez-Rilo, D. Finegold, M. Trucco. 1994. Evidence for superantigen involvement in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus aetiology. Nature 371:351.[Medline]
  21. Conrad, B., R. N. Weissmahr, J. Boni, R. Arcari, J. Schupbach, B. Mach. 1997. A human endogenous retroviral superantigen as candidate autoimmune gene in type I diabetes. Cell 90:303.[Medline]
  22. Brocke, S., A. Gaur, C. Piercy, A. Gautam, K. Gijbels, C. G. Fathman, L. Steinman. 1993. Induction of relapsing paralysis in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by bacterial superantigen. Nature 365:642.[Medline]
  23. Schiffenbauer, J., H. M. Johnson, E. J. Butfiloski, L. Wegrzyn, J. M. Soos. 1993. Staphylococcal enterotoxins can reactivate experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:8543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lustig, S., H. D. Danenburg, Y. Kafri, D. Kobiler, D. Ben-Nathan. 1992. Viral neuroinvasion and encephalitis induced by lipopolysaccharide and its mediators. J. Exp. Med. 176:707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. M. Ercolini and S. D. Miller
Molecular Mimics Can Induce Novel Self Peptide-Reactive CD4+ T Cell Clonotypes in Autoimmune Disease
J. Immunol., November 15, 2007; 179(10): 6604 - 6612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. A. Musse, J. M. Boggs, and G. Harauz
From the Cover: Deimination of membrane-bound myelin basic protein in multiple sclerosis exposes an immunodominant epitope
PNAS, March 21, 2006; 103(12): 4422 - 4427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. M. Ercolini and S. D. Miller
Mechanisms of Immunopathology in Murine Models of Central Nervous System Demyelinating Disease
J. Immunol., March 15, 2006; 176(6): 3293 - 3298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. L. Croxford, J. K. Olson, H. A. Anger, and S. D. Miller
Initiation and Exacerbation of Autoimmune Demyelination of the Central Nervous System via Virus-Induced Molecular Mimicry: Implications for the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis
J. Virol., July 1, 2005; 79(13): 8581 - 8590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. L. Croxford, H. A. Anger, and S. D. Miller
Viral Delivery of an Epitope from Haemophilus influenzae Induces Central Nervous System Autoimmune Disease by Molecular Mimicry
J. Immunol., January 15, 2005; 174(2): 907 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. K. Olson, T. N. Eagar, and S. D. Miller
Functional Activation of Myelin-Specific T Cells by Virus-Induced Molecular Mimicry
J. Immunol., September 1, 2002; 169(5): 2719 - 2726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. D. Moudgil, E. Kim, O. J. Yun, H. H. Chi, E. Brahn, and E. E. Sercarz
Environmental Modulation of Autoimmune Arthritis Involves the Spontaneous Microbial Induction of T Cell Responses to Regulatory Determinants Within Heat Shock Protein 65
J. Immunol., March 15, 2001; 166(6): 4237 - 4243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
L. B. Nicholson, A. C. Anderson, and V. K. Kuchroo
Tuning T cell activation threshold and effector function with cross-reactive peptide ligands
Int. Immunol., February 1, 2000; 12(2): 205 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. P. Rao, A. E. Kajon, K. R. Spindler, and G. Carayanniotis
Involvement of Epitope Mimicry in Potentiation But Not Initiation of Autoimmune Disease
J. Immunol., May 15, 1999; 162(10): 5888 - 5893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrizosa, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchroo, V. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carrizosa, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchroo, V. K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS