The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ayad, O.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ayad, O.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, H. R.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 161: 2594-2599.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

The Heat Shock Response Inhibits RANTES Gene Expression in Cultured Human Lung Epithelium1

Onsy Ayad*, James M. Stark{dagger}, Michael M. Fiedler{dagger}, Ingrid Y. Menendez*, Marnie A. Ryan* and Hector R. Wong2,*

* Division of Critical Care Medicine and {dagger} Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The chemokine RANTES is thought to be involved in the pathophysiology of inflammation-associated acute lung injury. Although much is known regarding signals that induce RANTES gene expression, relatively few data exist regarding signals that inhibit RANTES gene expression. The heat shock response, a highly conserved cellular defense mechanism, has been demonstrated to inhibit a variety of lung proinflammatory responses. We tested the hypothesis that induction of the heat shock response inhibits RANTES gene expression. Treatment of A549 cells with TNF-{alpha} induced RANTES gene expression in a concentration-dependent manner. Induction of the heat shock response inhibited subsequent TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression and secretion of immunoreactive RANTES. Transient transfection assays involving a RANTES promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid demonstrated that the heat shock response inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated activation of the RANTES promoter. Inhibition of NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation with isohelenin inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression, indicating that RANTES gene expression is NF-{kappa}B dependent in A549 cells. Induction of the heat shock response inhibited degradation of the NF-{kappa}B inhibitory protein, I-{kappa}B{alpha} but did not significantly inhibit phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}. We conclude that the heat shock response inhibits RANTES gene expression by a mechanism involving inhibition of NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation and subsequent inhibition of RANTES promoter activation. The mechanism by which the heat shock response inhibits NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation involves stabilization of I-{kappa}B{alpha}, without significantly affecting phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
RANTES is a member of the C-C chemokine subfamily. Several lines of evidence indicate that RANTES is an important proinflammatory mediator. RANTES has marked chemotactic activity for monocytes (1), causes selective migration of CD4+ T lymphocytes, eosinophils, and basophils (1, 2, 3), activates eosinophils leading to release of histamine and eosinophil cationic proteins (4), and increases expression of the CD11/CD18 adhesion molecule (2). RANTES expression has been demonstrated in a variety of diseases characterized by inflammation including asthma (5), respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis (6, 7), chronic polypous sinusitis (8), transplantation-associated accelerated atherosclerosis (9), endometriosis (10), and acute lung injury secondary to endotoxemia (11). The RANTES gene is inducible by viruses (e.g., respiratory syncytial virus) and cytokines (e.g., TNF-{alpha} and IL-1ß). Apart from glucocorticoids and IL-4, very little is known about factors that inhibit induction of RANTES gene expression (12, 13, 14).

The heat shock response is a highly conserved genetic response providing cells an adaptive mechanism to survive lethal stresses (for reviews see Refs. 15, 16). The original descriptions of the heat shock response involved the phenomenon known as thermotolerance, whereby subjecting cells to a brief period of sublethal hyperthermia conferred protection against subsequent exposure to otherwise lethal hyperthermia (17). Induction of the heat shock response was also demonstrated to protect against nonthermal forms of injury, such as acute lung injury. Induction of the heat shock response protected rats against acute lung injury secondary to either systemic administration of endotoxin (18, 19) or intratracheal instillation of phospholipase-A1 (20). In vitro induction of the heat shock response protected lung cells against endotoxin and oxidants (21, 22). The mechanisms by which the heat shock response confers protection against acute lung injury are not well understood. One potential mechanism of protection may involve the ability of the heat shock response to inhibit proinflammatory responses in lung cells. The heat shock response inhibited inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression in cultured lung cells treated with cytokines and in whole lungs of rats treated with endotoxin (23, 24, 25, 26). Recent data demonstrated that the heat shock response inhibited nuclear translocation of the proinflammatory transcription factor NF-{kappa}B and induced expression of the NF-{kappa}B inhibitory protein I-{kappa}B{alpha} in cultured lung cells (25, 27). Collectively, these data indicate that the heat shock response may have a broad antiinflammatory role in the lung. To further explore this concept we determined the effects of the heat shock response on RANTES gene expression. We demonstrate that the heat shock response inhibits RANTES mRNA expression, as well as secretion of immunoreactive RANTES. We further demonstrate that the heat shock response inhibits activation of the RANTES promoter, possibly by preventing nuclear translocation of NF-{kappa}B.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell culture

A human lung adenocarcinoma cell line (A549 cells), representative of distal respiratory epithelium, was used in all experiments. A549 cells were previously demonstrated to express RANTES in response to treatment with TNF-{alpha} (13). Cells were grown in plastic tissue culture flasks and maintained in a room air/5% CO2 incubator using DMEM (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) containing 8% FBS (Life Technologies), sodium bicarbonate (2 gm/l), and penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies).

Experimental conditions

The heat shock response was induced by incubating cells at 43°C for 1 h as previously described (27). RANTES was induced by treating cells with recombinant human TNF-{alpha} (10 to 100 ng/ml, Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) for 24 h. In transient transfection assays, cells were treated with TNF-{alpha} for 4 h. To determine the effects of the heat shock response on TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES gene expression, one group of cells was heat shocked and allowed to recover at 37°C for 1 h before treatment with TNF-{alpha}. To determine the effects of NF-{kappa}B inhibition on TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES gene expression, one group of cells was treated with the NF-{kappa}B inhibitor isohelenin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 50 µM) for 1 h before treatment with TNF-{alpha}. To determine the effects of the heat shock response on phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}, one group of cells was treated with the proteosome inhibitor MG-132 (Sigma, 10 µM) for 1 h before treatment with TNF-{alpha}.

Northern blot analysis

Treated cells were harvested for total RNA extraction using the Trizol reagent (Life Technologies). Total RNA was quantified by spectrophotometry (260 nM), and 15 µg of total RNA per condition underwent electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels containing 3% formaldehyde. The integrity of the RNA after electrophoresis was confirmed by ethidium bromide staining and brief ultraviolet illumination. RNAs were transferred to nylon membranes (Micron Separation, Westboro, MA) and ultraviolet light cross-linked (UV Stratalinker 1800, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). After a 4-h prehybridization at 42°C, membranes were hybridized overnight with a radiolabeled human RANTES cDNA probe (a kind gift of Dr. Alan M. Krensky, Stanford University School of Medicine; 28 . The cDNA probe was radiolabeled with [{alpha}-32P]dCTP (sp. act. 3,000 Ci/mM, New England Research Products, Boston, MA) by random priming (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). The hybridized filters were serially washed at 53°C using 2x sodium citrate/sodium chloride/0.1% SDS, and 25 mM NaHPO4/1 mM EDTA/0.1% SDS solutions. After washing, exposure was conducted overnight using a Phosphor Imager screen (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). To normalize results for loading differences, membranes were stripped with boiling 5 mM EDTA and rehybridized with an end-labeled [{gamma}-32P]dATP oligonucleotide probe for 18s rRNA.

RANTES ELISA

Immunoreactive RANTES levels in the media of treated cells were quantified using a commercially available sandwich ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). All procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Nuclear protein extraction

Nuclear protein extracts were prepared from treated cells grown to 80% confluence in 100-mm2 dishes. All nuclear extraction procedures were performed on ice with ice-cold reagents. Cells were washed twice with PBS and harvested by scraping into 1 ml of PBS and pelleted at 6,000 rpm for 5 min. The pellet was washed twice with PBS, resuspended in one packed cell volume of lysis buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2% v/v Nonidet P-40, 1 mM DTT, and 0.1 mM PMSF), and incubated for 5 min with occasional vortexing. After centrifugation at 6,000 rpm, one cell pellet volume of extraction buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 420 mM NaCl, 0.1 M EDTA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 25% v/v glycerol, 1 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM PMSF) was added to the nuclear pellet and incubated on ice for 15 min with occasional vortexing. The nuclear proteins were isolated by centrifugation at 14,000 RPM for 15 min. Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and stored at -70°C until used for electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)3.

EMSA

The NF-{kappa}B oligonucleotide probe used for EMSA (5'-AGT TGA GGG GAC TTT CCC AGG C-3') was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The probe was labeled with [{gamma}-32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Life Technologies) and purified in Bio-Spin chromatography columns (Bio-Rad).

For EMSA, 10 µg of nuclear proteins were preincubated with EMSA buffer (12 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 4 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.9, 25 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 50 ng/ml poly[d(I-C)], 12% glycerol v/v, and 0.2 mM PMSF) on ice for 10 min before addition of the radiolabeled oligonucleotide probe for an additional 10 min. Protein-nucleic acid complexes were resolved using a nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel consisting of 5% acrylamide (29:1 ratio of acrylamide:bisacrylamide) and run in 0.5x TBE (45 mM Tris-HCl, 45 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA) for 1 h at constant current (30 mA). Gels were transferred to Whatman 3 M paper, dried under a vacuum at 80°C for 1 h, and exposed to photographic film at -70°C with an intensifying screen.

Western blot analysis

Treated cells were washed once in PBS and lysed in ice-cold buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 110 mM NaCL, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, and PMSF (100 µg/ml). Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford assay. Whole cell lysates were boiled in equal volumes of loading buffer (125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, and 2% 2-ME) and 50 µg of protein loaded per lane on an 8 to 16% Tris-glycine gradient gel (Novex, San Diego, CA). Proteins were separated electrophoretically and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Novex) using the Novex Xcell MiniGel system. For immunoblotting, membranes were blocked with 10% nonfat dried milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) for 1 h. Primary Ab against human I{kappa}-B{alpha} (polyclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was applied at a 1:200 dilution for 1 h. After washing two times in TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TTBS), secondary Ab (peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, Sigma) was applied at a 1:10,000 dilution for 1 h. Blots were washed in TTBS two times over 30 min, incubated in commercial enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (ECL, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England), and exposed to photographic film.

Transient transfections, functional promoter analyses, and luciferase assays

The effect of the heat shock response on TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES promoter activation was analyzed by transiently transfecting cells with a RANTES promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid (a kind gift of Dr. Alan M. Krensky, Stanford University School of Medicine). This plasmid contains a -421-bp 5' flanking sequence of the human RANTES gene and has been previously described in detail (28).

Another group of cells was transfected with a reporter plasmid in which the human I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter was cloned upstream from the luciferase reporter gene. Oligonucleotide primers were designed by the University of Cincinnati DNA Core Facility corresponding to the most 5' and 3' regions of the published human I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter sequence (29). Using these primers a 1.3-kb human I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter fragment was recovered from a human genomic DNA template using PCR. The PCR product was ligated into the plasmid pCR2.1 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and sequenced by the Sanger dideoxy method. Sequence analysis demonstrated >99% correlation between the PCR product and the published human I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter sequence (29). A KpnI/XhoI fragment incorporating the 1.3-kb I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter fragment was excised from pCR2.1 and subcloned into the plasmid pGL2 (Promega, Madison, WI) such that the I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter regulated expression of the reporter gene firefly luciferase.

Cells were transfected in duplicate, in six-well plates, at a density of 300,000 cells per well by incubation with cationic liposomes (Lipofectin, Life Technologies) for 5 h in Opti-MEM (Life Technologies). After transfection, cells were washed once with PBS and allowed to recover overnight. After exposure to experimental conditions, cellular proteins were extracted and analyzed for luciferase activity according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega) using a Berthold AutoLumat LB953 luminometer. Luciferase activity is reported as light units corrected for total cellular protein.

Cell Viability

Cell viability after exposure to the experimental conditions was determined by MTT assay as previously described (24). This is a colorimetric assay based on the ability of viable cells to reduce the tetrazolium dye 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) to formazan. Percent cell viability is calculated as (absorbance of treated cells)/(absorbance of control cells) x 100.

Statistical analysis

Differences in immunoreactive RANTES expression, luciferase activity, and cell viability between the experimental groups were evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Student Newman Keuls test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Induction of the heat shock response inhibits TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression

Treatment of A549 cells with TNF-{alpha} for 24 h increased RANTES mRNA expression in a concentration-dependent manner, compared with unstimulated control cells (Fig. 1Go). These data are consistent with previous studies involving A549 cells (13). We previously demonstrated that incubation at 43°C for 1 h induced the heat shock response in A549 cells, as measured by induction of heat shock protein-70 (27). To determine whether induction of the heat shock response alters RANTES mRNA expression, one group of cells was incubated at 43°C for 1 h, recovered at 37°C for 1 h, then treated with varying concentrations of TNF-{alpha} for 24 h. Induction of the heat shock response inhibited subsequent TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression (Fig. 1Go). For all doses of TNF-{alpha} tested, prior induction of the heat shock response reduced RANTES mRNA expression to a similar level found in unstimulated control cells. Cells subjected to heat shock alone had no detectable changes in RANTES mRNA levels compared with unstimulated control cells. Cell viability was greater than 90% after all experimental conditions (data not shown). These data demonstrate that induction of the heat shock response inhibits TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression in A549 cells.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Representative Northern blot analysis demonstrating the effect of the heat shock response on RANTES mRNA expression. Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of TNF-{alpha} for 24 h. Heat-shocked cells were incubated at 43°C for 1 h, recovered at 37°C for 1 h, then treated with the indicated concentrations of TNF-{alpha} for 24 h. 18s rRNA was used to control for loading difference. Data are representative of five separate experiments having similar results.

 
Induction of the heat shock response inhibits secretion of immunoreactive RANTES

Having demonstrated that the heat shock response inhibited RANTES mRNA expression, we next determined if the heat shock response would alter secretion of immunoreactive RANTES. Treatment with TNF-{alpha} for 24 h increased secretion of immunoreactive RANTES into the media of treated cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2Go). Induction of the heat shock response inhibited secretion of immunoreactive RANTES after all doses of TNF-{alpha}. Immunoreactive RANTES was not detectable in the media of unstimulated control cells and in the media of cells that were heat shocked alone (data not shown). Collectively, these data demonstrate that induction of the heat shock response inhibits TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES gene expression in A549 cells.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. ELISA data demonstrating the effect of the heat shock response on immunoreactive RANTES levels in the media of treated cells. Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of TNF-{alpha} for 24 h. Heat-shocked cells were incubated at 43°C for 1 h, recovered at 37°C for 1 h, then treated with the indicated concentrations of TNF-{alpha} for 24 h. Cells treated with TNF-{alpha} alone are represented by solid lines and squares, and cells treated with heat shock and TNF-{alpha} are represented by dashed line and circles. Immunoreactive RANTES was not detectable in the media of control cells and cells subjected to heat shock alone (data not shown). Data represent the means ± SEM from five separate experiments. * indicates p < 0.05 compared with cells treated with TNF-{alpha} alone.

 
Induction of the heat shock response inhibits RANTES promoter activation

Because RANTES expression is primarily regulated transcriptionally, we next determined if the heat shock response alters TNF-{alpha}-mediated activation of the RANTES promoter. A549 cells were transiently transfected with a plasmid in which the reporter gene firefly luciferase was under the control of the RANTES promoter. Treatment with 30 ng/ml of TNF-{alpha} for 4 h increased luciferase activity ~14-fold above that of control cells (transfected and treated with basal growth media), demonstrating that TNF-{alpha} activated the RANTES promoter (Fig. 3Go). Induction of the heat shock response inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated increases in luciferase activity. Heat shock alone did not affect luciferase activity compared with control cells.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Average luciferase activities (± SEM) of cells transiently transfected with a RANTES promoter-luciferase plasmid and subjected to the indicated conditions. Data are plotted as mean light units (± SEM) corrected for total cellular protein and represent five separate experiments in duplicate. * indicates p < 0.05 vs control. ** indicates p < 0.05 vs cells treated with TNF-{alpha} alone.

 
To determine the specificity of this effect, another group of cells was transiently transfected with a human I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid. This model was chosen because we previously demonstrated that the heat shock response did not inhibit TNF-{alpha}-mediated I-{kappa}B{alpha} mRNA expression (27). In the current experiments, treatment with TNF-{alpha} for 4 h increased luciferase activity in cells transiently transfected with the I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter-luciferase plasmid, demonstrating that TNF-{alpha} activated the I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter (Fig. 4Go). Induction of the heat shock response did not inhibit TNF-{alpha}-mediated increases in luciferase activity. In fact, the combination of heat shock and TNF-{alpha} increased luciferase activity above that of cells treated with TNF-{alpha} alone.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Average luciferase activities (± SEM) of cells transiently transfected with an I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter-luciferase plasmid and subjected to the indicated conditions. Data are plotted as mean light units (± SEM) corrected for total cellular protein and represent five separate experiments in duplicate. * indicates p < 0.05 vs control. ** indicates p < 0.05 vs cells treated with TNF-{alpha} alone.

 
These data demonstrate that induction of the heat shock response inhibits TNF-{alpha}-mediated activation of the RANTES promoter in A549 cells. The specificity of this effect is evident by the demonstration that the heat shock response does not inhibit TNF-{alpha}-mediated activation of the I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter.

Effect of NF-{kappa}B inhibition on TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression

The RANTES promoter contains several NF-{kappa}B binding sites, and recent evidence supports NF-{kappa}B-dependent regulation of RANTES (28, 30, 31). To determine whether NF-{kappa}B is involved in the regulation of RANTES mRNA expression in A549 cells, we treated cells with isohelenin, a sesquiterpene lactone recently described to be a specific inhibitor of NF-{kappa}B activation (32). Treatment of A549 cells with TNF-{alpha} for 0.5 h caused nuclear translocation of NF-{kappa}B (Fig. 5Go, lane 2). The specificity of this band was previously demonstrated by competitor and supershift assays (27). Treatment with isohelenin inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated nuclear translocation of NF-{kappa}B (Fig. 5Go, lane 3), consistent with a previous report (32).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Representative EMSA demonstrating the effect of isohelenin on TNF-{alpha}-mediated NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation. Lane 1: control cells; lane 2: cells treated with TNF-{alpha} (30 ng/ml) for 0.5 h; lane 3: cells were treated with isohelenin (50 µM) for 1 h before treatment with TNF-{alpha}. The specificity of the NF-{kappa}B band was previously demonstrated by supershift and competitor assays (27). Isohelenin stock solutions were dissolved in DMSO, and equivalent amounts of DMSO were added to cells not treated with isohelenin.

 
Having demonstrated that isohelenin inhibits TNF-{alpha}-mediated NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation in A549 cells, we next determined the effect of isohelenin on TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression. Treatment with isohelenin inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression (Fig. 6Go, compare lane 3 to lane 2). These data indicate that TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression is dependent on NF-{kappa}B activation in A549 cells. Because the heat shock response was previously demonstrated to inhibit TNF-{alpha}-mediated NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation in A549 cells (27), these data indirectly suggest that the heat shock response inhibits RANTES gene expression by inhibiting NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Representative Northern blot analysis demonstrating the effect of isohelenin on TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression. Lane 1: control cells; lane 2: cells treated with TNF-{alpha} (30 ng/ml) for 24 h; lane 3: cells were treated with isohelenin (50 µM) for 1 h before treatment with TNF-{alpha}. 18s rRNA was used to control for loading differences. Isohelenin stock solutions were dissolved in DMSO, and equivalent amounts of DMSO were added to cells not treated with isohelenin.

 
Effect of the heat shock response on phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}

NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation is regulated by a family of intracellular proteins called I-{kappa}B (reviewed in 33 . I-{kappa}B{alpha} retains NF-{kappa}B in the cytoplasm by physically masking its nuclear translocation sequences. An important early event in the activation of NF-{kappa}B involves phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}. Phosphorylated I-{kappa}B{alpha} is targeted for ubiquitination and subsequent degradation by the 26S proteosome pathway. Degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha} unmasks NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation sequences, allowing translocation of active NF-{kappa}B to the nucleus.

In these experiments we determined the effect of the heat shock response on phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}. Phosphorylated I-{kappa}B{alpha} is inherently unstable and difficult to detect by Western blot analysis. To detect phosphorylated I-{kappa}B{alpha}, cells were pretreated with the relatively specific 26s proteosome inhibitor, MG-132, as previously described (34). MG-132 inhibits proteosome-mediated degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha} but does not affect its phosphorylation. Treatment with TNF-{alpha} caused a rapid disappearance of immunoreactive I-{kappa}B{alpha} within 15 min, consistent with its degradation (Fig. 7Go, lane 2). Treatment with MG-132 partially inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated degradation of immunoreactive I-{kappa}B{alpha} and caused the appearance of a slower migrating band corresponding to phosphorylated I-{kappa}B{alpha} (Fig. 7Go, lane 3, 34 . A similar band was noted when cells were pretreated with both heat shock and MG-132, before treatment with TNF-{alpha} (Fig. 7Go, lane 5). Induction of the heat shock response alone inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha} and caused the appearance of a faint, slower migrating band similar to that seen in cells pretreated with MG-132 alone (Fig. 7Go, compare lanes 4 and 3). Collectively, these data demonstrate that the heat shock response inhibits TNF-{alpha}-mediated degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha} but does not strongly affect phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Representative Western blot analysis demonstrating the effect of the heat shock response on phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}. To induce phosphorylation and degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}, cells were treated with TNF-{alpha} (10 ng/ml) for 15 min. To detect phosphorylated I-{kappa}B{alpha}, some cells were treated with the proteosome inhibitor MG-132 (10 µM) for 1 h before TNF-{alpha} treatment. The heat shock response was induced in some cells 1 h before TNF-{alpha} treatment. MG-132 stock solutions were dissolved in DMSO, and equivalent amounts of DMSO were added to cells not treated with MG-132.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our results demonstrate that the heat shock response is a potent inhibitor of RANTES gene expression in vitro. Induction of the heat shock response inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated expression of RANTES mRNA and secretion of immunoreactive RANTES. These effects were not secondary to cytotoxicity, and are consistent with previous data demonstrating that the heat shock response inhibited proinflammatory responses of lung cells (23, 24, 25, 26, 27). We propose that the observed inhibition is not a generalized effect of the heat shock response. Rather, it appears that the heat shock response has a relatively specific inhibitory effect on lung proinflammatory responses. Evidence to support this assertion includes the observation that the heat shock response did not affect surfactant protein gene expression in cultured respiratory epithelium (24). Moreover, the heat shock response increased I-{kappa}B{alpha} gene expression in cultured respiratory epithelium, a protein that normally functions to inhibit NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation and is not currently considered to be one of the heat shock proteins (27).

Transient transfection assays involving a RANTES promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid demonstrated that the heat shock response inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated induction of luciferase activity. These data suggest that the mechanism by which the heat shock response inhibits RANTES gene expression involves inhibition of the RANTES promoter. In parallel experiments involving cells transiently transfected with an I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter-luciferase plasmid, the heat shock response did not inhibit TNF-{alpha}-mediated induction of luciferase activity. These data allow us to conclude that the observed inhibition of the RANTES promoter was a relatively specific effect, rather than a generic effect of the heat shock response.

The RANTES promoter contains four NF-{kappa}B binding sites, and recent data indicate that the RANTES gene is NF-{kappa}B dependent (28, 30, 31). Isohelenin, a recently described and relatively specific inhibitor of NF-{kappa}B activation (32), inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation and TNF-{alpha}-mediated RANTES mRNA expression in A549 cells. These data provide evidence that RANTES gene expression is NF-{kappa}B dependent in A549 cells. Since the heat shock response profoundly inhibited TNF-{alpha}-mediated nuclear translocation of NF-{kappa}B in A549 cells (29), it is reasonable to propose that the heat shock response inhibits activation of the RANTES promoter and subsequent induction of the RANTES gene by preventing nuclear translocation of NF-{kappa}B.

Under basal conditions NF-{kappa}B is retained in the cytoplasm by the I-{kappa}B protein family (reviewed in 33 . In response to a proinflammatory signal, I-{kappa}B{alpha} is rapidly degraded by a phosphorylation- and ubiquitination-dependent pathway. Phosphorylated and ubiquitinated I-{kappa}B{alpha} is targeted for degradation by 26S proteosome. Upon degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}, NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation sequences are unmasked, and activated NF-{kappa}B translocates to the nucleus to direct transcription of proinflammatory genes. Inhibition of NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation can occur at several steps along this pathway, including inhibition of I-{kappa}B{alpha} phosphorylation, inhibition of I-{kappa}B{alpha} ubiquitination, and/or inhibition of the 26S proteosome.

The heat shock response was previously demonstrated to inhibit degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha} after a proinflammatory stimulus (27, 35), thus providing a potential mechanism by which the heat shock response inhibits NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation. In the current study we determined if the heat shock response inhibits phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha} using a qualitative assay. Our data confirm that the heat shock response inhibits TNF-{alpha}-mediated degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}. If the heat shock response significantly impacts TNF-{alpha}-mediated phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}, then we would have expected to not see a slower migrating band in cells pretreated with the combination of heat shock and MG-132 (Fig. 7Go, lane 5). In cells pretreated with the combination of heat shock and MG-132, before treatment with TNF-{alpha}, there is a clear demonstration of a slower migrating band that corresponds to phosphorylated I-{kappa}B{alpha}. Although it is possible that the heat shock response had a small effect on phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha} that we could not detect with our qualitative assay, from these data we can at least conclude that the heat shock response does not have a major impact on phosphorylation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}. Furthermore, these data indicate that the primary inhibitory effect of the heat shock response on degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha} involves a mechanism distal to phosphorylation. Possible mechanisms include inhibition of ubiquitination or direct inhibition of the 26S proteosome. We are currently investigating these issues.

The heat shock response protects against inflammation-associated acute lung injury (reviewed in 15 . The mechanisms of this protective effect are not fully understood, but recent evidence suggests that modulation of lung proinflammatory responses may be involved in protection. The current study supports this concept by demonstrating that the heat shock response inhibits RANTES gene expression. We propose that the heat shock response protects against inflammation-associated lung injury by modulating the expression of various NF-{kappa}B-dependent genes (e.g., RANTES) that are involved in the pathophysiology of inflammation-associated lung injury. Models such as the one described here will help to further test this hypothesis and to better understand the mechanisms by which the heat shock response modulates proinflammatory gene expression.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Thomas P. Shanley for insightful comments during the preparation of this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by a research grant from the American Lung Association and a Pediatric Center for Gene Expression and Development Pediatrician/Scientist Career Development Award (National Institutes of Health Grant HD28827–05) to H.R.W. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Hector R. Wong, Division of Critical Care Medicine-OSB5, Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviation used in this paper: EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Back

Received for publication December 24, 1997. Accepted for publication May 5, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Schall, T. J., K. Bacon, K. J. Toy, D. V. Goeddel. 1990. Selective attraction of monocytes and T lymphocytes of the memory phenotype by cytokine RANTES. Nature 347:669.[Medline]
  2. Alam, R., S. Stafford, P. Forsythe, R. Harrison, D. Faubion, M. A. Lett-Brown, A. J. Grant. 1993. RANTES is a chemotactic and activating factor for human eosinophils. J. Immunol. 150:3442.[Abstract]
  3. Bischoff, S. C., M. Krieger, T. Brunner, A. Rot, V. Von Tscharner, M. Baggiolini, C. A. Dahinden. 1993. RANTES and related chemokines activate human basophil granulocytes through different G protein-coupled receptors. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:761.[Medline]
  4. Rot, A., M. Krieger, T. Brunner, S. C. Bischoff, T. J. Schall, C. A. Dahinden. 1992. RANTES and macrophage inflammatory protein 1 {alpha} induce the migration and activation of normal human eosinophil granulocytes. J. Exp. Med. 176:1489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Powell, N., M. Humbert, S. R. Durhamm, B. Assoufi, A. B. Kay, C. J. Corrigan. 1996. Increased expression of mRNA encoding RANTES and MCP-3 in the bronchial mucosa in atopic asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 9:2454.[Abstract]
  6. Saito, T., R. W. Deskin, A. Casola, H. Haeberle, B. Olszewska, P. B. Ernst, R. Alam, P. L. Ogra, R. Garofalo. 1997. Respiratory syncytial virus induces selective production of the chemokine RANTES by upper airway epithelial cells. J. Infect. Dis. 175:497.[Medline]
  7. Becker, S., W. Reed, F. W. Henderson, T. L. Noah. 1997. RSV infection of human airway epithelial cells causes production of the ß-chemokine RANTES. Am. J. Physiol. 272:L512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Maune, S., I. Berner, M. Sticherling, R. Kulke, J. Bartels, J. M. Shroder. 1996. Fibroblasts but not epithelial cells obtained from human nasal mucosa produce the chemokine RANTES. Rhinology 34:210.[Medline]
  9. Pattison, J. M., P. J. Nelson, P. Huie, R. K. Sibley, A. M. Krensky. 1996. RANTES chemokine expression in transplant-associated accelerated atherosclerosis. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 15:1194.[Medline]
  10. Hornung, D., I. P. Ryan, V. A. Chao, J. L. Vigne, E. D. Schriock, R. N. Taylor. 1997. Immunolocalization and regulation of the chemokine RANTES in human endometrial and endometriosis tissues and cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82:1621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. VanOtteren, G. M., R. M. Strieter, S. L. Kunkel, III R. Paine, M. J. Greenberger, J. M. Danforth, M. D. Burdick, T. J. Standiford. 1995. Compartmentalized expression of RANTES in a murine model of endotoxemia. J. Immunol. 154:1900.[Abstract]
  12. Berkman, N., A. Robichaud, V. L. Krishnan, G. Roesems, R. Robbins, P. J. Jose, P. J. Barnes, K. F. Chung. 1996. Expression of RANTES in human airway epithelial cells: effect of corticosteroid and interleukin-4, -10 and -13. J. Immunol. 87:599.
  13. Kwon, O. J., P. J. Jose, R. A. Robbins, T. J. Schall, T. J. Williams, P. J. Barnes. 1995. Glucocorticoid inhibition of RANTES expression in human lung epithelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 12:488.[Abstract]
  14. Stellato, C., L. A. Beck, G. A. Gorgone, D. Proud, T. J. Schall, S. J. Ono, L. M. Lichtenstein, R. P. Schleimer. 1995. Expression of the chemokine RANTES by a human bronchial epithelial cell line. J. Immunol. 155:410.[Abstract]
  15. Wong, H. R., J. R. Wispé. 1997. The stress response and the lung. Am. J. Physiol. 273:L1.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Welch, J. W.. 1992. Mammalian stress response: cell physiology structure/function of stress proteins, and implication for medicine and disease. Physiol. Rev. 72:1063.[Free Full Text]
  17. Gerner, E. W., M. J. Schneider. 1975. Induced thermal resistance in HeLa cells. Nature 256:500.[Medline]
  18. Villar, J., S. P. Ribeiro, J. B. Mullen, M. Kuliszewski, M. Post, A. S. Slutsky. 1994. Induction of the heat shock response reduces mortality rate and organ damage in a sepsis induced acute lung injury model. Crit. Care Med. 22:914.[Medline]
  19. Ribeiro, S. P., J. Villar, G. P. Downey, J. D. Edelson, A. S. Slutsky. 1994. Sodium arsenite induces heat shock protein-72 kilodalton expression in the lungs and protects rats against sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 22:922.[Medline]
  20. Villar, J., J. D. Edelson, M. Post, J. B. Mullen, A. S. Slutsky. 1993. Induction of heat shock proteins is associated with decreased mortality in an animal model of acute lung injury. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 147:177.[Medline]
  21. Wong, H. R., R. J. Mannix, J. M. Rusnak, A. Boota, H. Zar, J. S. Lazo, B. R. Pitt. 1996. The heat shock response attenuates lipopolysaccharide-mediated apoptosis in cultured sheep pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 15:745.[Abstract]
  22. Wong, H. R., M. Ryan, I. Y. Menendez, A. Denenberg, J. R. Wispé. 1997. Heat shock protein induction protect human respiratory epithelium against nitric oxide-mediated cytotoxicity. Shock 8:213.[Medline]
  23. Wong, H. R., J. D. Finder, K. Wasserloos, B. R. Pitt. 1995. Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in cultured rat pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells is inhibited by the heat shock response. Am. J. Physiol. 269:L843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wong, H. R., M. Ryan, S. Gebb, J. R. Wispé. 1997. Selective and transient in vitro effects of heat shock on respiratory epithelial gene expression. Am. J. Physiol. 272:L132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Wong, H. R., M. Ryan, J. R. Wispé. 1997. The heat shock response inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression by blocking I-{kappa}B degradation and NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 231:257.[Medline]
  26. Hauser, G. J., E. K. Dayao, K. Wasserloos, B. R. Pitt, H. R. Wong. 1996. Heat shock protein induction inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression and attenuates hypotension in endotoxin-challenged rats. Am. J. Physiol. 271:H2529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Wong, H. R., M. Ryan, J. R. Wispé. 1997. Stress response decreases NF-{kappa}B nuclear translocation and increases I-{kappa}B{alpha} expression in A549 cells. J. Clin. Invest. 99:2423.[Medline]
  28. Nelson, P. J., H. T. Kim, W. C. Manning, T. J. Goralski, A. M. Krensky. 1993. Genomic organization and transcriptional regulation of the RANTES chemokine gene. J. Immunol. 151:2601.[Abstract]
  29. Ito, C. Y., A. G. Kazantsev, Jr A. S. Baldwin. 1994. Three NF-{kappa}B sites in the I-{kappa}B{alpha} promoter are required for induction of gene expression by TNF-{alpha}. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:3787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Moriuchi, H., M. Moriuchi, A. S. Fauci. 1997. Nuclear factor-{kappa}B potently up-regulates the promoter activity of RANTES, a chemokine that blocks HIV infection. J. Immunol. 158:3483.[Abstract]
  31. Manni, A., J. Kleimberg, V. Ackerman, A. Bellini, F. Patalano, S. Mattoli. 1996. Inducibility of RANTES mRNA by IL-1ß in human bronchial epithelial cells is associated with increased NF-{kappa}B DNA binding activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 220:120.[Medline]
  32. Hehner, S. P., M. Heinrich, P. M. Bork, M. Vogt, F. Ratter, V. Lehmann, K. Schulze-Osthoff, W. Dröge, M. L. Schmitz. 1998. Sesquiterpene lactones specifically inhibit activation of NF-{kappa}B by preventing the degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha} and I-{kappa}Bß. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Jr Baldwin, A. S.. 1996. The NF-{kappa}B and I-{kappa}B proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:649.[Medline]
  34. Spiecker, M., H. B. Peng, J. K. Liao. 1997. Inhibition of endothelial vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression by nitric oxide involves the induction and nuclear translocation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}. J. Biol. Chem. 272:30969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Feinstein, D. L., E. Galea, D. J. Reis. 1997. Suppression of glial nitric oxide synthase induction by heat shock: effects of proteolytic degradation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}. Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. 1:167.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Du, N. Hiramatsu, K. Hayakawa, A. Kasai, M. Okamura, T. Huang, J. Yao, M. Takeda, I. Araki, N. Sawada, et al.
Suppression of NF-{kappa}B by Cyclosporin A and Tacrolimus (FK506) via Induction of the C/EBP Family: Implication for Unfolded Protein Response
J. Immunol., June 1, 2009; 182(11): 7201 - 7211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Hayakawa, N. Hiramatsu, M. Okamura, H. Yamazaki, S. Nakajima, J. Yao, A. W. Paton, J. C. Paton, and M. Kitamura
Acquisition of Anergy to Proinflammatory Cytokines in Nonimmune Cells through Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response: A Mechanism for Subsidence of Inflammation
J. Immunol., January 15, 2009; 182(2): 1182 - 1191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. Okamura, Y. Takano, N. Hiramatsu, K. Hayakawa, J. Yao, A. W. Paton, J. C. Paton, and M. Kitamura
Suppression of cytokine responses by indomethacin in podocytes: a mechanism through induction of unfolded protein response
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): F1495 - F1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
R. M. Carlson, S. R. Vavricka, J. J. Eloranta, M. W. Musch, D. L. Arvans, K. A. Kles, M. M. Walsh-Reitz, G. A. Kullak-Ublick, and E. B. Chang
fMLP induces Hsp27 expression, attenuates NF-{kappa}B activation, and confers intestinal epithelial cell protection
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): G1070 - G1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
E. M. Egorina, M. A. Sovershaev, T. V. Kondratiev, J. O. Olsen, T. Tveita, and B. Osterud
Induction of Monocytic Tissue Factor Expression After Rewarming From Hypothermia In Vivo Is Counteracted by Heat Shock in c-Jun-Dependent Manner
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2006; 26(10): 2401 - 2406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J.-F. Pittet, H. Lee, M. Pespeni, A. O'Mahony, J. Roux, and W. J. Welch
Stress-Induced Inhibition of the NF-{kappa}B Signaling Pathway Results from the Insolubilization of the I{kappa}B Kinase Complex following Its Dissociation from Heat Shock Protein 90
J. Immunol., January 1, 2005; 174(1): 384 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. I. Wickremasinghe, L. H. Thomas, C. M. O'Kane, J. Uddin, and J. S. Friedland
Transcriptional Mechanisms Regulating Alveolar Epithelial Cell-specific CCL5 Secretion in Pulmonary Tuberculosis
J. Biol. Chem., June 25, 2004; 279(26): 27199 - 27210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Q. Wang, X. Wang, and B. M. Evers
Induction of cIAP-2 in Human Colon Cancer Cells through PKC{delta}/NF-{kappa}B
J. Biol. Chem., December 19, 2003; 278(51): 51091 - 51099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Page, J. Li, L. Zhou, S. Iasvoyskaia, K. C. Corbit, J.-W. Soh, I. B. Weinstein, A. R. Brasier, A. Lin, and M. B. Hershenson
Regulation of Airway Epithelial Cell NF-{kappa}B-Dependent Gene Expression by Protein Kinase C{delta}
J. Immunol., June 1, 2003; 170(11): 5681 - 5689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Andoh, S. Fujino, S. Bamba, Y. Araki, T. Okuno, T. Bamba, and Y. Fujiyama
IL-17 Selectively Down-Regulates TNF-{alpha}-Induced RANTES Gene Expression in Human Colonic Subepithelial Myofibroblasts
J. Immunol., August 15, 2002; 169(4): 1683 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. A. Sonna, J. Fujita, S. L. Gaffin, and C. M. Lilly
Molecular Biology of Thermoregulation: Invited Review: Effects of heat and cold stress on mammalian gene expression
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2002; 92(4): 1725 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J F Pittet, L N Lu, T Geiser, H Lee, M A Matthay, and W J Welch
Stress preconditioning attenuates oxidative injury to the alveolar epithelium of the lung following haemorrhage in rats
J. Physiol., January 15, 2002; 538(2): 583 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
K. G. Leidal, K. L. Munson, and G. M. Denning
Small Molecular Weight Secretory Factors from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Have Opposite Effects on IL-8 and RANTES Expression by Human Airway Epithelial Cells
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2001; 25(2): 186 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
E. Moyse, M. Lyon, G. Cordier, J.-F. Mornex, L. Collet, and P. Froehlich
Viral RNA in Middle Ear Mucosa and Exudates in Patients With Chronic Otitis Media With Effusion
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, September 1, 2000; 126(9): 1105 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C.-G. Yoo, S. Lee, C.-T. Lee, Y. W. Kim, S. K. Han, and Y.-S. Shim
Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Heat Shock Protein Induction Is Related to Stabilization of I{kappa}B{alpha} Through Preventing I{kappa}B Kinase Activation in Respiratory Epithelial Cells
J. Immunol., May 15, 2000; 164(10): 5416 - 5423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ayad, O.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ayad, O.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, H. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS