|
|
||||||||

*
Section of Immunobiology and
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and IL-4-positive
cells in the vicinity of the islets; these mice, however, never
progress to diabetes. This fundamental difference in the ability of
CD80 and CD86 to activate self-reactive T cells in vivo is, however,
obliterated when the level of TCR signaling is increased by either
TNF-
or transgenic MHC class II expression. These results support
the suggestion that CD80 and CD86 mainly differ at the level of the
intensity of the signals they deliver. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
following repeated stimulation with
CD86-transfected COS cells compared with CD80-transfected COS cells
(20). In contrast, anti-CD86 was very efficient at preventing the
development of spontaneous autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice, another
Th1-mediated autoimmune disease, while anti-CD80 exacerbated
disease (21, 22). Interestingly, NOD mice on a CD28-/-
background showed an increased incidence of diabetes associated with an
increased representation of IFN-
-producing cells in the islets (22).
This observation raised the possibility that Th2 responses would
require CD28 costimulation, while Th1 responses would be less dependent
on CD28-mediated costimulation, a possibility that has been
substantiated both in vitro and in vivo (23, 24, 25, 26). Other studies,
however, do not support such a model (27, 28), confirming the
protective effect of CTLA-4Ig treatment on graft rejection (reviewed in
29 . There are several difficulties that arise in the interpretation of the above data. Most of the studies aimed at resolving the roles of CD80 and CD86 in T cell activation in vivo used Ab administration to block the different B7 molecules. This protocol could generate complications and artifacts resulting from Fc receptor signaling or cross-linking of the B7 molecules that could account for the discrepancies described. And indeed, using CD80- or CD86-deficient APC, such a dichotomy was not substantiated (30, 31). Moreover, expression of CD80 and CD86 is regulated differently depending of the type of APC and these molecules are also expressed on T cells (14, 32). It could thus be possible that the differences observed were linked to a selection or activation of the APC, that itself would have different potentials in stimulating different effector functions.
To circumvent these problems and to directly address the roles of CD80 and CD86 in the activation of self-reactive T cells in vivo and thus in the development of autoimmunity, we generated mice that express one or both molecules on a given tissue. Following this approach we and others have described transgenic mice expressing CD80 on the islets of Langerhans (RIP-CD80) (33, 34, 35). We extended this analysis and generated transgenic mice on a C57BL/6 background that express the CD86 costimulatory molecule on ß cells (RIP-CD86). The comparative analysis of these two lines of transgenic mice in different transgenic models of autoimmune diabetes highlights some essential differences in the ability of CD80 or CD86 to induce T cell activation. These differences are however obliterated when the level of TCR signaling is increased, suggesting that CD80 and CD86 mainly differ at the level of the intensity of the signals they deliver.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transgenic mice expressing the mouse inflammatory cytokine
TNF-
(RIP-TNF-
) (36), the class II IE molecule (Ins-IE) (37), or
the human CD80 (3B7 or RIP-CD80) (34) on ß cells have been described
previously. Mice transgenic for a TCR specific for the SV40 large T Ag
presented by the H-2Kk class I molecules were provided by
T. Geiger (38). RIP-CD86 transgenic mice were generated by
microinjection of a cDNA construct encoding the human CD86 molecule
driven by the rat insulin promoter (RIP)5
into the pronuclei of fertilized (B6xCBA/Ca)F2 eggs as previously
described (39). The RIP-CD86 construct was generated as follows. A
SmaI-NotI fragment corresponding to the
full-length human cDNA isolated from psk-B70 vector (a generous gift
from A. Bothwell) was coligated with a
NotI-HindIII fragment corresponding to part of
the third and fourth exons of E
(providing a splice site and a
polyadenylation site) isolated from RIP-B7 vector (34) into blunt-end
EcoRI and HindIII sites of psk-RIP. The psk-RIP
vector corresponded to the minimal 0.6 kb of the RIP promoter inserted
into Psk (a generous gift from D. Picarella). A
SacI-KpnI fragment was isolated for
microinjection. All the mice were backcrossed on C57BL/6 and were
H-2b homozygotes except when otherwise specified.
RNA analysis
Total RNA from different tissues was extracted by acid
guanidinium-thiocyanate (40), treated with DNase I, reverse transcribed
with oligo(dT) into cDNA, and then amplified by PCR, as previously
described (41). For the PCR reaction, a forward primer within the CD86
cDNA (5'-CGACGTTTCCATCAGCTTGTCTG-3') and a reverse primer in the
fourth exon of the E
gene (5'-CAAGACTCCAGGGATTTGAGGGA-3') were used,
distinguishing the unspliced DNA contaminant of 1360 bp from the
spliced RNA product of 720 bp (Fig. 1
).
The PCR reactions were run on an 0.8% agarose gel, transferred to
nylon membrane, and hybridized with a CD86-specific probe.
-Actin
primers were used for RNA from all tissues as a control for the quality
of RNA preparation and the efficiency of cDNA synthesis.
|
Responding CD8+ T cells were isolated from lymph
nodes of TG-B transgenic mice that had been crossed on C57BL/6, a
nonpresenting H-2b background. Lymph nodes cells were
incubated with a class II-specific (m5/114) (42) and a CD4-specific
(GK1.5) (43) Ab, washed, and incubated with a mixture of goat
anti-mouse Ig- and goat anti-rat Ig-coated magnetic beads
(Collaborative Research, Bedford, MA) followed by two cycles of
exposure to a magnetic field. The ß cells were obtained by trypsin
digestion of hand-picked islets isolated from a collagenase digestion
of total pancreas (44). Before trypsinization, isolated islets were
incubated overnight in medium containing 100 U/ml IFN-
(Life
Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) to up-regulate MHC class I
expression. T cells (1 x 104) were incubated with
2 x 104
-irradiated ß cells with or without the
9 mer SV40 peptide (45) and the human CD86-specific Ab IT2.2 at final
concentrations of 10 µM and 10 µg/ml, respectively. In parallel
TG-B T cells were stimulated with a titration of spleen APC, allowing
for a direct comparison, on a per cell basis, of the efficacy of islet
cells to activate TG-B T cells. On day 5, 50 µl of supernatant was
harvested for IL-2 testing, and the remaining cultures were
pulsed overnight with 1 µCi [3H]thymidine. IL-2
production was measured by bioassay using the CTLL-2 cell line as
previously described (34).
Measurement of blood glucose levels
Mice were bled weekly, and glucose levels were measured using the One Touch (Johnson and Johnson, Milipitas, CA) apparatus. Mice with blood glucose levels of >250 mg/dl were considered diabetic.
Histology and Immunocytochemistry
For histology, the organs were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded
in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. All
immunocytochemistry was performed on 7-µm frozen sections (46) in
Tris buffer, pH 7.5, with 1% BSA and 0.01% Triton, except for
cytokine staining, where 0.5% Triton was used. Abs recognizing CD4,
CD8, B220, IL-4, and IFN-
as well as rat isotype controls were
purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA); biotinylated anti-rat
IgG was obtained from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA);
anti-insulin, anti-glucagon, and biotinylated anti-rabbit
IgG were purchased from Biogenex (San Ramon, CA). Sections were
incubated for 2 h with unconjugated or biotinylated Ab followed,
when required, by a 1.5-h incubation with a secondary, biotinylated Ab.
Streptavidin coupled to alkaline phosphatase (Zymed, South San
Francisco, CA) was then added for 40 min, and development of color was
revealed with HistoMark-Red (Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories,
Gaithersburg, MD). All sections were counterstained Gills hematoxylin
no. 1.
The specificity of the cytokine staining was first determined using
cytospin preparations of Th1 or Th2 clones derived from a D10 TCR
transgenic mouse (a gift from Bonnie Dittel, Yale University).
Specificity was confirmed using OVA/CFA-activated spleen and lung
sections from IL-4-/- and IFN-
-/-
animals as well as normal animals with OVA-specific Th1 or Th2 cells
transferred. In all stainings nonspecific isotype-matched control mAbs
were used on parallel sections. All stainings were read blind, and at
least four islets per section were analyzed. The number of
cytokine-positive cells per islet or infiltrate was calculated by
dividing the number of positive cells per slide by the total number of
islets analyzed. The different ratios were calculated using these
numbers. A dividend of zero was considered as 1.
Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) staining
Mice were injected i.p. with 0.6 mg of BrdUrd (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) 15 to 18 h before death. Seven-micron sections of pancreata or spleen were treated with 70% ethanol for 20 min, followed by a 20-min treatment with 3 N HCl in 0.5% Tween (Sigma) and a final neutralization with 0.01 M tetraborate (Sigma), as previously described (47). Treated slides were stained for 20 min with a 1/10 dilution of FITC-conjugated anti-BrdUrd Ab (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have indicated that mouse and human CD86 interact with mouse CD28 and have identical costimulatory activity for mouse T cells (7). Thus, we generated transgenic mice that express the human CD86 costimulatory molecule, which could readily be distinguished from the endogenous mouse homologue, specifically on the ß cells of the pancreas using the rat insulin promoter (RIP-CD86). Thirteen transgenic lines were generated, and three of them were further selected on the basis of their tissue specificity and level of expression.
Expression of the transgenically encoded CD86 molecule was analyzed at
the RNA level by RT-PCR and at the protein level by immunocytochemistry
on tissue sections. For the PCR reaction we used a set of primers that
spanned an intron, thus allowing the discrimination between products
amplified from an RNA template from those resulting from a direct
amplification of contaminating DNA (Fig. 1
A). We found that
mRNA corresponding to the human CD86 transgene was detected only in the
pancreas of the three different lines studied (Fig. 1
A
and not shown). As shown in Figure 1
A, very low levels of
mRNA corresponding to the CD86 transgene could be detected in the
kidney and thymus of some, but not all, mice from line 12B70. When
detected, the level of signal was estimated at 3 to 30 molecules.
Similarly, by immunocytochemistry we showed that expression of the
human CD86 protein was restricted to the islets of Langerhans (Fig. 1
B), while spleen and thymus remained negative (not shown).
Together these results show that only islets express significant levels
of the transgenically encoded CD86 molecules. The three lines express
different levels of transgene on their ß cells. Line 12B70 shows a
variably low level of expression, while lines 46B70 and 38B70 express
high and very high levels of human CD86, respectively (Fig. 1
B). Furthermore, neither acinar cells nor endothelial cells
showed any detectable level of the human CD86 molecule (Fig. 1
B).
We then determined whether human CD86 expressed by ß cells had
costimulatory activity for T cells in vitro. Normal islets express MHC
class I Ags but no MHC class II molecules. To analyze the in vitro
response of unprimed T cells specifically, we used T cells from TCR
transgenic mice expressing an H-2Kk-restricted TCR specific
for the SV40 large T Ag (TG-B). We had previously shown that both
proliferation and IL-2 production of TG-B T cells are dependent on
costimulatory signals (48). Indeed, as previously reported, normal
islets, which do not express B7 molecules, are unable to activate TG-B
T cells (Fig. 2
). By contrast, islets
expressing CD86 efficiently stimulated Ag-specific IL-2 production and
proliferation of TG-B T cells (Fig. 2
). The response was completely
abolished by an Ab specific for the transgenically encoded CD86
molecule. Moreover, the magnitude of the response increased as the
level of CD86 expression by islets increased. We compared the
proliferative response and IL-2 production induced by varying numbers
of spleen APC with that induced by islets from the different transgenic
mice. We found that 12B70, 38B70, and 46B70 induced, respectively,
11.9, 39.9, and 100.6% of the proliferative response and 22.9, 32.3,
and 150% of the IL-2 production obtained upon stimulation with the
same number of spleen APC. Likewise, we could show, by transfer
experiments, that CD86-expressing islets were potent activators of
allo-reactive T cells in vivo (not shown). Together these results
indicate that following CD86 expression islets acquired the ability to
activate T cells in vitro or in vivo.
|
We had previously shown that although CD80-expressing
islets are potent stimulators of naive T cells in vitro and in vivo,
RIP-CD80 transgenic mice rarely develop diabetes (33). To determine
whether CD86 expression by islets, in contrast to CD80, could induce
the activation of autoreactive T cells and thus autoimmune diabetes, we
analyzed several transgenic mice over a long period of time. We found
that neither mice expressing low (12B70) nor those expressing high
(38B70 and 46B70) levels of CD86 on ß cells showed any sign of
autoimmunity until the age of 7 mo (Fig. 3
A). Starting at about 7 to 8
mo of age, however, all mice developed a perivascular/periductal
infiltration (referred to hereafter as peri-islet). The onset or
severity of the peri-islet infiltration was independent of the level of
CD86 expression by islet cells, but was always found in the proximity
of an islet, suggesting that it was a direct consequence of CD86
expression by ß cells (Fig. 3
A, be). We
followed the mice over a 14-mo period and found that the infiltrate
never progressed to insulitis or diabetes. Indeed, islets from either
preinfiltrated or infiltrated pancreata of RIP-CD86 transgenic mice
showed normal architecture and a normal staining pattern for
insulin-producing ß cells or glucagon-producing
cells (Fig. 3
, A and B). Furthermore, coexpression of CD80 with
CD86 on islets had no additional effect on the time of onset or the
severity of the infiltration (Fig. 3
Af).
|
Presence of activated cells within the peri-islet infiltrate of RIP-CD86 transgenic mice
An alternative possibility for the lack of insulitis in RIP-CD86 transgenic mice could be an inability of CD86 to promote T cell activation in vivo. We therefore determined whether activated lymphocytes were present within the peri-islet infiltrate found in RIP-CD86 transgenic mice.
Proper activation of T cells results in entry into the cell cycle
as well as induction of T cell-specific effector functions. Cell
cycling can be analyzed by staining with BrdUrd, a thymidine analogue
that will incorporate in newly synthesized DNA. Thus, RIP-CD86 mice
were treated with BrdUrd, and pancreas sections were analyzed 15 to
18 h later. As shown in Figure 4
Aa a large number of
lymphocytes found within the peri-islet infiltrate did incorporate
BrdUrd. The absence of BrdUrd-positive cells within the spleen of
RIP-CD86 mice (data not shown) suggests that the activation is a direct
consequence of CD86 expression by islet cells.
|
-producing Th1 cells play an
essential role in the development of autoimmune diabetes. By contrast,
IL-4-producing Th2 cells have been postulated to be harmless and in at
least one transgenic mouse model of spontaneous autoimmune diabetes
prevented the development of disease (52). It could be possible, then,
that the absence of insulitis and diabetes in the RIP-CD86 transgenic
mice resulted from the preferential induction by CD86 expressing islets
of a Th2 anti-self response. To test this possibility we stained
pancreatic sections of RIP-CD86 mice with IFN-
- or IL-4-specific Ab
and determined the average numbers of IFN-
+ and
IL4+ cells per infiltrate in 11 different RIP-CD86
transgenic mice. Both IFN-
- and IL-4-positive cells could be
detected in the pancreas within the peri-islet infiltrate (Fig. 4
+ cells in
some infiltrates (Fig. 4
+ cells (Fig. 5
+ cells with
an average ± SEM ratio of IL-4+/IFN-
+
of 7.3 ± 2.1. Moreover, while the representation of
IFN-
+ cells did not change much with age, there seemed
to be an increased accumulation of IL-4+ cells within the
pancreatic infiltrate as the mice aged. Indeed, the representation of
IL4+ cells per infiltrate increased from 8.6 ± 4.0 at
12 mo to 45.8 ± 20.6 at 14 mo (Fig. 5
|
Development of diabetes in RIP-CD86xRIP-TNF-
double transgenic
mice
Inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-
are associated with the
development of numerous autoimmune diseases, including diabetes, and
are very efficient at inducing lymphocyte migration, potentially
through the up-regulation of expression of adhesion molecules by
vascular endothelium. Indeed, RIP-TNF-
transgenic mice expressing
the inflammatory cytokine TNF-
on islets show a massive lymphocytic
infiltration of pancreatic islets (36, 53). Local expression of TNF-
by ß cells also results in the up-regulation of the expression of MHC
class I Ags by ß cells and of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 by the associated
vascular endothelium (36). RIP-TNF-
transgenic mice on a C57BL/6
background, however, never developed diabetes. We have previously shown
that all transgenic mice that coexpress the CD80 costimulatory
molecule, at low or high levels as observed in the 3B7 line, and the
TNF-
cytokine on their ß cells (RIP-CD80 x RIP-TNF-
(CD80/TNF)) develop diabetes at 4 to 5 wk of age (34). Diabetes in
these double transgenic mice was associated with the activation of
islet-specific autoreactive T cells (34). We determined the cytokines
produced by islet-infiltrating cells in prediabetic or diabetic
CD80/TNF double transgenic mice. Both IL-4- and IFN-
-positive cells
are found within the infiltrates (Fig. 6
A). While the overall number
of IFN-
+ cells found in infiltrated islets of
prediabetic (4 wk of age) and diabetic animals (6 wk of age) did
not differ greatly, the frequency of IL-4+ cells
increased as the mice became diabetic (Fig. 6
A). Indeed, we
found mean numbers (±SEM) of 1.8 ± 1.4 IL-4+ cells
in prediabetic mice and 4.6 ± 2.4 IL-4+ cells in
diabetic mice. This change is more clearly exemplified when considering
the ratio of IFN-
+/IL-4+ cells in CD80/TNF
mice, which decreases from 16.1 ± 9.2 in prediabetic mice to
2.1 ± 1.0 in diabetic mice. Thus, in this transgenic model of
autoimmune diabetes, IL-4-producing Th2 cells mainly develop at the
late stage of the autoimmune response and do not interfere with the
primary Th1 response.
|
transgenic mice
discussed above (CD86/TNF). As expected, all nontransgenic (-/-) or
single transgenic littermates expressing either the CD86 (CD86/-) or
the TNF-
(-/TNF) transgene remained normoglycemic (Fig. 7
molecules on the islets (CD86/TNF) became
diabetic, with 80% of the mice showing elevated blood glucose levels
by 6 wk of age (Fig. 7
-positive cells found in the islets of prediabetic and
diabetic double transgenic mice. As in CD80/TNF transgenic mice, islets
from CD86/TNF double transgenic mice contained both IL-4- and
IFN-
-positive cells (Fig. 6
+ cells, however, was higher in the CD86/TNF
transgenic mice (mean ± SEM, 7.4 ± 1.7) than in CD80/TNF
(3.0 ± 1.0) and RIP-CD86 single transgenic (3.7 ± 1.8)
mice. Interestingly, the frequency of IL-4+ Th2 cells found
in all double transgenic CD86/TNF was dramatically reduced, especially
when compared with their representation in the peri-islet infiltrates
of RIP-CD86 single transgenic mice (15.4 ± 6.3 for RIP-CD86
transgenic mice compared with 3.1 ± 1.7 for CD86/TNF double
transgenic mice). Together these results indicate that in this double
transgenic mouse model, both CD80 and CD86 express similar qualitative
costimulatory activities; that is, both induce the activation of Th1
and Th2 cells and promote the development of diabetes. CD86, however,
seems more efficient at triggering effector functions in T cells,
since we observed an increased representation of cytokine-producing
cells within the islets of double transgenic mice expressing TNF-
together with CD86 compared with those coexpressing TNF-
and CD80
(Fig. 6
|
cytokine has at least two consequences that
could contribute to the development of diabetes in double transgenic
CD86/TNF mice. First, following TNF-
expression by islets,
lymphocytes do not accumulate in the perivascular space, but can enter
the islets. Moreover, since RIP-TNF-
transgenic mice express the
cytokine TNF-
during embryogenesis, insulitis develops very early,
contrasting with the delayed peri-islet infiltrate observed in RIP-CD86
transgenic mice (first observed at 7 mo of age). Second, TNF-
expression by islet cells seems to impair the development of Th2 cells
occurring in RIP-CD86 transgenic mice. Although TNF-
has not
yet been directly implicated in skewing T cell differentiation toward a
Th1 pathway, the expression of both TNF receptors I and II by activated
T cells leaves open the possibility that TNF-
can affect T cell
responses (54).
Accumulation of activated T cells in RIP-TNF-
transgenic mice
As previously described (36), both CD4+ and
CD8+ cells are present within the islets of RIP-TNF-
transgenic mice. Interestingly, the representation of CD8+
cells is dramatically lower (
10% (n = 8)) and the
representation of CD4+ cells increased (
43%;
n = 8) in RIP-TNF-
single transgenic mice compared
with that in diabetic double transgenic CD80/TNF and CD86/TNF mice that
show 24% (n = 8) and 28% (n = 6)
CD8+ cells, respectively, and 27.5% (n =
8) and 26.2% (n = 5) CD4+ cells,
respectively. The activation phenotype of islet-infiltrating
lymphocytes in nondiabetic RIP-TNF-
was analyzed to dissect further
the consequences of local expression of TNF-
. To our surprise,
cytokine-positive cells were also present in the islets of RIP-TNF-
transgenic mice. Both IFN-
- and IL-4-positive cells are detected,
but at a lower frequency compared with prediabetic or diabetic double
transgenic CD86/TNF mice (Fig. 6
C). Additional experiments
are required to determine whether this accumulation of
cytokine-producing cells reflects a direct effect of TNF-
on the
activation of islet-specific T cells or simply the preferential
recruitment, by TNF-
, of activated cells within the tissue.
Likewise, it will be important to determine to what extent the effects
of TNF-
expression on lymphocyte activation affect the
immunoreactivity toward islet-specific Ags. Nonetheless, these
observations raised the possibility that the development of diabetes in
CD86/TNF double transgenic mice might result from a direct effect of
TNF-
on islet-specific T cells that could over-ride the propensity
of CD86 to induce Th2 cells.
Development of diabetes in RIP-CD86xIns-IE
We have previously shown that expression of a high level of MHC class II IE Ags on islet cells that by itself was unable to induce autoimmunity would in conjunction with CD80 expression by islets allow the activation of autoreactive T cells and autoimmune destruction of ß cells (33). Indeed, we showed that while neither transgenic mice expressing the class II IE molecule (Ins-IE) nor the CD80 costimulatory molecule on islets develop autoimmune diabetes, all double transgenic mice (CD80/IE) develop insulitis at about 2 mo of age that progresses to a specific autoimmune destruction of ß cells. As previously reported, Ins-IE single transgenic mice exhibit a nonautoimmune form of diabetes that is also observed in double transgenic mice coexpressing the IE and CD80 molecules on islets (33, 37). However, only double transgenic mice showed insulitis and a specific loss of insulin-producing ß cells that was associated with the activation of islet-specific, IE-restricted, autoreactive T cells (33). Thus, providing CD80-expressing islets with a high level of expression of class II IE Ags was sufficient to induce autoimmune diabetes.
Using this transgenic mouse model, we could determine whether
CD86 expression on the islets could contribute to the activation of
autoreactive T cells and ß cell destruction in the absence of a local
inflammatory reaction. We thus crossed Ins-IE mice with RIP-CD86
transgenic mice. Double transgenic mice coexpressing CD86 and class II
IE molecules on islets (CD86/IE) developed insulitis starting at about
5 mo of age (not shown). As the insulitis progressed, islet
architecture became completely disorganized, and islet tissue was
replaced by a ductal hyperplasia (Fig. 8
Ab). Similar to CD80/IE
double transgenic mice, most CD86/IE double transgenic mice develop
clinical signs resembling diabetes, mainly weight loss and dehydration,
that led to death, in most cases at about 6 mo of age. Both single
transgenic Ins-IE and double transgenic CD86/IE mice showed elevated
blood glucose levels. Indeed, as previously reported (37) Ins-IE mice
showed a blood glucose level of 300 mg/dl at 8 wk of age that increased
to an average of 412 mg/dl at 4 to 6 mo of age. Low levels of insulin
production by ß cells in Ins-IE mice (Fig. 8
B), although
not adequate to fully control glucose levels in blood or urine,
appeared sufficient to maintain basal glucose metabolism. Similarly,
young CD86/IE double transgenic mice showed blood glucose levels
averaging 363 mg/dl at 8 wk of age and rising to 402 mg/dl at 4 to 6 mo
of age when clinical signs were marked. Disease progression in double
transgenic CD86/IE was associated with a specific loss of
insulin-producing cells, while glucagon-producing
cells were spared
(Fig. 8
B). As destruction of insulin-producing ß cells
increased, double transgenic CD86/IE mice developed clinical signs of
diabetes and eventually died. In this case, and as was observed in
CD80/IE double transgenic mice, disease progression and death could be
controlled by daily injection of insulin, further suggesting that
CD86/IE double transgenic mice suffer from autoimmune destruction of
insulin-producing ß cells. Some double transgenic mice, however,
survived for longer periods of time while remaining diabetic. Pancreata
isolated from these mice also showed a completely disorganized islet
architecture with, however, residual insulin-producing cells. Further
study indicated that the remaining ß cells expressed a reduced level
of class II IE Ag and no CD86, possibly allowing escape from immune
destruction (not shown). Persistence of a few insulin-producing cells
might, in this case, suffice to maintain a basal level of glucose
metabolism. CD86/IE double transgenic mice thus resemble CD80/IE double
transgenic mice, demonstrating similar autoimmune destruction of ß
cells.
|
-positive cells detected in either
CD80/IE or CD86/IE double transgenic mice greatly resembled the
frequencies detected in CD80/TNF or CD86/TNF transgenic mice,
respectively. Indeed, while the number of cytokine-positive cells was
higher when transgenic mice coexpressed the class II IE molecule
together with the CD86 costimulatory molecule on ß cells compared
with CD80, the ratio of IFN-
-positive over IL-4-positive cells was
similar in both transgene combinations (Fig. 9
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this paper we describe three lines of transgenic mice with different levels of expression of CD86 costimulatory molecules specifically on islet cells that all show the same fundamental phenotype and compare them with transgenic mice expressing CD80 on islets (33, 34). Our analysis, for the most part, has been performed using section staining to highlight what was occurring in situ, especially concerning cytokine secretion as well as BrdUrd analysis. This lead us to highlight some intrinsic differences between CD80 and CD86 in their abilities to provide costimulatory signals for the activation of autoreactive T cells in vivo. Moreover, this study suggests additional regulatory steps in lymphocyte trafficking that could contribute to the control of autoimmune responses.
Peri-islet infiltration but absence of insulitis in RIP-CD86
All RIP-CD86 transgenic mice, independent of the level of CD86 expressed on ß cells, develop a peri-islet infiltrate at the age of 7 to 8 mo that almost never progresses to insulitis or diabetes. Quite strikingly, the phenotype observed in RIP-CD86 transgenic mice resembles the phenotype in congenic NOD mice with a MHC class I H-2b locus, which also develop a peri-islet infiltrate without insulitis (55). By two criteria, proliferation and cytokine production, we could show that activated cells accumulate in the peri-islet infiltrate. An essential question, then, is why are these activated cells not causing diabetes?
It is first important to state that we have no direct proof that this activation is islet specific. Several lines of indirect evidence suggest, however, that the peri-islet infiltrate observed in RIP-CD86 transgenic mice is a consequence of expression of CD86 by ß cells and thus involves islet-specific T cells. First, in no other organ did we find expression of the transgenically encoded CD86 costimulatory molecule or observe any inflammatory responses. Second within the pancreas, lymphocytes accumulated specifically in the perivascular or periductal area in the proximity of an islet, and no other pancreatic cell types except ß cells expressed the transgenic CD86 molecule. Third the infiltrates associated with the islets contain activated lymphocytes. Under these conditions, the lack of insulitis is more likely due to an inability of lymphocytes to persist within the islets. The only peculiarity of the infiltrate observed in RIP-CD86 transgenic mice is the over-representation of Th2 cells. Reduced expression of inflammatory Th1 cytokines or overexpression of Th2-type cytokines might then preclude the expression of appropriate adhesion molecules required for T cell trafficking. Interestingly, we found no up-regulation of the expression of VCAM-1 or ICAM-1 by the vascular endothelium in the proximity of the infiltrate, although T cell extravasation seemed to have taken place (not shown). More recent studies have suggested an essential role for E- and P-selectins in the migration of Th1, but not Th2, cells toward an inflammatory site (56, 57). Expression of E- and P-selectin that is preferentially induced by inflammatory cytokines is, however, not down-regulated by IL-4 (58, 59). Human Th2 lymphocytes have been shown to express the eotaxin receptor CCR3 (60). Chemokines and their receptors, which are expressed differentially, may also regulate access of different Th subsets into sites of inflammation.
Alternatively, the lack of insulitis and diabetes in RIP-CD86
transgenic mice might result from insufficient CD4+ T cell
help. Indeed, while CD8+ T cells are required for the
initiation of autoimmune diabetes (49, 50), activated CD4+
T cells are capable of mediating tissue destruction (61, 62). Further,
Kurts et al. recently showed that CD4+ T cells are
essential in preventing deletion of self-reactive CD8+ T
cells and thus contribute to the development of autoimmune diabetes
(63). In RIP-CD86 transgenic mice, CD4+ T cell help is
probably limiting, since islet cells that do not normally express MHC
class II molecules are presumably the only APC. Interestingly, CD86
transgenic mice that also express MHC class II IE on their islets
develop autoimmune destruction of their islets. This, however,
contrasts with double transgenic mice that coexpress CD86 and TNF-
molecules on their islets and that develop spontaneous diabetes despite
a lack of expression of MHC class II molecules by ß cells.
Additional experiments are clearly required to elucidate by which mechanisms insulitis is prevented in RIP-CD86 transgenic mice. Interestingly, however, these observations suggest a novel, unsuspected mechanism by which Th2 responses could control self-reactivity. Indeed, in such a model, inhibition of autoaggressivity would not be through the negative regulation of an anti-self Th1 response but, rather, simply by preventing tissue access to potentially harmful cells.
Are CD80 and CD86 equally potent at inducing autoreactive T cell activation and autoimmune responses?
Our comparative study of RIP-CD86 and RIP-CD80 transgenic mice
suggests that CD80 and CD86 have different abilities to support
self-reactive T cell activation in vivo. Indeed, the phenotype of
RIP-CD86 transgenic mice contrasts quite dramatically with that of
transgenic mice expressing CD80 on islets that only rarely (<3% of
the mice) develop insulitis (34). These differences, however, are
obliterated when islets also express high level of MHC class II Ag or
the inflammatory cytokine TNF-
. Indeed, then, CD80 and CD86 show
similar abilities in sustaining the activation of self-reactive T
cells, leading to ß cell destruction. We have suggested that tissue
cells, even when provided with costimulatory molecules such as CD80,
are poorly immunogenic for naive T cells, probably because they express
insufficient MHC class I Ag that would be below the threshold required
for T cell activation. Increased levels of MHC class I Ag were observed
when TNF-
was expressed by islets. Likewise, Ins-IE transgenic mice
expressed high levels of transgenic class II IE. It appears, then, that
when TCR signaling is low, as is observed in single transgenic mice,
RIP-CD80 or RIP-CD86, only CD86 can induce a certain level of
activation. In contrast, under conditions where TCR signaling is high,
due to higher levels of MHC class I or II expression, as is observed
when TNF-
or IE are expressed on islets, CD80 and CD86 are similarly
potent at inducing autoimmune destruction of ß cells. Increased TCR
engagement seems then to over-ride the signaling differences resulting
from CD28 interaction with CD80 or CD86.
Interestingly, in all the transgenic and double transgenic mouse models
we analyzed, CD86 was always more potent than CD80 at stimulating
cytokine production (Figs. 5
and 9
). This suggests that CD86 is more
efficient than CD80 at supporting effector T cell activation in vivo.
The increased number of activated T cells within the infiltrated
islets, however, did not accelerate the disease process in CD86/TNF-
or CD86/IE mice. Two different interpretations might explain this
finding. Following on the idea that the level of TCR signaling
determines the extent of T cell activation, we would suggest that the
differences observed in our transgenic mice simply reflect differences
in CD28 signaling. A corollary would be that CD28 engagement lowers the
threshold for T cell activation (64). In such a model, the interaction
of CD28 with CD86 would be more potent than CD28 interaction with CD80.
Thus, the appropriate threshold for T cell activation would be met in
RIP-CD86 transgenic mice but not in RIP-CD80 transgenic mice. This is,
however, at least in part in contradiction with the finding that CD80
has a slightly higher avidity for CD28 than does CD86 (11).
Interestingly, the interaction of CD80 and CD86 with CTLA-4 follows the
same hierarchy (11). Recent studies have clearly highlighted the role
that CTLA-4 plays in the negative regulation of T cell activation
(65, 66, 67). It is thus possible that the reduced level of T cell
activation observed in the different transgenic mice expressing CD80 on
ß cells reflects stronger negative regulation through CTLA-4 or a
better balance of the two signals.
It is important to state that such interpretations rely on the reported affinity of human CD28 or CTLA-4 for human CD80 or CD86. It is not yet clear whether the same hierarchy of affinities is observed in mice, or indeed whether this can be applied to mouse receptors and human ligand, as in our transgenic mice models. Mice expressing mouse (35) or human (33, 34) CD80 on the islets of Langerhans, however, showed the same fundamental phenotype, suggesting that the reported lower affinity of human CD80 for mouse CD28 or CTLA-4 does not significantly alter the in vivo response.
Does CD86 preferentially induce a Th2 response?
We found in all infiltrated islets from RIP-CD86 transgenic mice a
high number of IFN-
-producing cells and a 3- to 10-fold higher
number of IL-4-producing cells. The over-representation of Th2 cells in
the islets of RIP-CD86 mice is significant, since Th1 responses are,
under most priming conditions, dominant in C57BL/6 mice. This bias
toward a Th2 response, however, is obliterated when islets coexpress
CD86 and TNF-
or a high level of MHC class II Ags. It has been
suggested that differentiation of T cells along the Th1 or the Th2
pathway might be determined by the density of ligand expressed by APC
(68, 69). Thus, low to intermediate ligand density would preferentially
induce a Th2 response, while high ligand density preferentially elicits
a Th1 response. Interestingly, in RIP-CD86 single transgenic mice, in
which tissue cells express low levels of MHC class I Ags and thus low
ligand density, a Th2 response dominates. In contrast, in either
CD86/TNF-
or CD86/IE, where islets express high levels of MHC class
I or class II Ag, respectively, a Th1 response dominates.
Together these results are compatible with a threshold model for T cell
differentiation by which the threshold for the initiation of
transcription of the Th2 program of gene expression would be lower than
the threshold requirements for the Th1 program of gene expression.
Several studies have already suggested that a different level of TCR
signaling can induce different T cell responses in both
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (70, 71). We would thus
suggest that at low ligand density, the interaction of CD28 with CD86,
but not with CD80, could reach the threshold for T cell activation.
This level of signaling would however only reach the threshold required
for Th2 transcription. When MHC expression by islets is increased, then
both CD80 and CD86 are sufficient, and the threshold allowing Th1
differentiation is now met. As expected in such models, Th1 and Th2
responses could coexist and would simply reflect the heterogeneity of
TCR avidity for a given MHC/peptide complex as well as the level of
expression of any given autoantigen. Interestingly, as observed in our
transgenic mice models, Th1 and Th2 cells can coexist without
interfering with tissue damage. This does not, however, preclude the
possibility that over-representation of Th2 cells can interfere with
the development of diabetes. This is, in fact, exemplified in RIP-CD86
and RIP-TNF-
single transgenic mice that do not develop disease and
show ratios of IFN-
+/IL-4+ cells of <1 and
2, respectively, while diabetes-prone mice show an average ratio >5.
Concluding remarks
Numerous studies have, over the past few years clearly shown that
an anti-self immune response does not necessarily lead to tissue
inflammation and autoimmune disease. This is clearly exemplified in
transgenic mouse models where lymphocytic infiltration and autoimmune
tissue destruction develop only when the Th2 anti-self immune
response subsides while the Th1 response remains unaltered (52, 72).
Quite unexpectedly we found, through analysis of both RIP-CD86 and
RIP-TNF-
transgenic mice, that in two cases in vivo tolerance can
persist despite the accumulation of activated, potentially
self-reactive T cells in the pancreas. These results suggest an
additional regulatory step in the maintenance of self-tolerance beyond
a simple Th1/Th2 imbalance. It is worth noting that 2 of 70 RIP-CD86
mice analyzed developed insulitis and diabetes at 12 mo of age.
Interestingly, these two mice demonstrated a severe pancreatitis
exemplified by a complete destruction of all pancreatic tissues,
including acinar and ß cells, that resemble the disease observed in
mice suffering from Th2-mediated diabetes (73). These observations
strongly indicate that both Th1 and Th2 cells can contribute to
autoimmune destruction of tissue by mechanisms that clearly need to be
clarified.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
3 Present address: Centre dImmunolgie de Marseille Luminy, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Case 906, 13288 Marseille, France. ![]()
4 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Richard A. Flavell, Section of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 310 Cedar St., FMB 412, New Haven, CT 06520. E-mail address: ![]()
5 Abbreviatons used in this paper: RIP, rat insulin promoter; BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine. ![]()
Received for publication December 17, 1997. Accepted for publication April 27, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production. J. Exp. Med. 179:299.
leads to autoimmunity in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5138.
production in pancreatic islets leads to insulitis, not diabetes. J. Immunol. 150:4136.[Abstract]
transgene in murine pancreatic ß cells results in severe and permanent insulitis without evolution towards diabetes. J. Exp. Med. 176:1719.
ß-transgenic model. J. Exp. Med. 182:1579.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. J. Thomas, L. G. Petrich de Marquesini, R. Ravanan, R. M. Smith, S. Guerder, R. A. Flavell, D. C. Wraith, L. Wen, and F. S. Wong CD86 Has Sustained Costimulatory Effects on CD8 T Cells J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 5936 - 5946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sun, B. Tumurbaatar, J. Jia, H. Diao, F. Bodola, S. M. Lemon, W. Tang, D. G. Bowen, G. W. McCaughan, P. Bertolino, et al. Parenchymal Expression of CD86/B7.2 Contributes to Hepatitis C Virus-Related Liver Injury J. Virol., August 15, 2005; 79(16): 10730 - 10739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Stephens and D. D. Chaplin IgE Cross-Linking or Lipopolysaccharide Treatment Induces Recruitment of Th2 Cells to the Lung in the Absence of Specific Antigen J. Immunol., November 15, 2002; 169(10): 5468 - 5476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kitani, K. Chua, K. Nakamura, and W. Strober Activated Self-MHC-Reactive T Cells Have the Cytokine Phenotype of Th3/T Regulatory Cell 1 T Cells J. Immunol., July 15, 2000; 165(2): 691 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Schell, L. M. Mylin, I. Georgoff, A. K. Teresky, A. J. Levine, and S. S. Tevethia Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Epitope Immunodominance in the Control of Choroid Plexus Tumors in Simian Virus 40 Large T Antigen Transgenic Mice J. Virol., July 1, 1999; 73(7): 5981 - 5993. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |