|
|
||||||||
Priming of Human Monocytes Differentially Regulates Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria-Induced IL-10 Release and Selectively Enhances IL-12p70, CD80, and MHC Class I Expression1

*
University of Montreal, Louis-Charles Simard Research Center, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Canada; and
Department of Bioregulatory Function, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IFN-
may protect or induce
autoimmune diseases. Although the in vitro regulation of monokine
secretion by IFN-
have been extensively studied, the regulatory
function of IFN-
has not yet been elucidated. We compared IFN-
and IFN-
, added alone or simultaneously before bacterial
stimulation, for the control of monokine release and the expression of
costimulatory molecules by human monocytes. Our data show that: 1)
IFN-
primes monocytes for increased production of IL-10 in response
to Staphylococcus aureus Cowan I strain (SAC) but not to
LPS, leading to a lack of IFN-
priming for TNF-
secretion; 2)
pretreatment of monocytes with IFN-
inhibits LPS- or SAC-induced
IL-12p40 production but unexpectedly enhances the release of the
biologically active form of IL-12 (IL-12p70); 3) IFN-
and IFN-
exert an antagonistic effect on LPS- and SAC-induced IL-10 as well as
IL-12p40 release, whereas they further enhance IL-12p70 production when
added simultaneously; 4) in contrast to IFN-
, IFN-
primes
monocytes to enhance LPS- or SAC-induced TNF-
and IL-12 production,
but surprisingly, it increases IL-10 production by monocytes following
LPS but not SAC stimulation; and finally, 5) IFN-
pretreatment
selectively up-regulates CD80 and MHC class I expression on monocytes.
It is proposed that the outcome of the immune response at the site of
inflammation may depend on both the type of bacterial injury
(Gram-positive or -negative) and of locally produced IFNs, and that the
differential and opposite effects of type I and type II IFNs on
monocytes may account for the beneficial or detrimental effects of
IFN-
therapy. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IFN-ß, IFN-
, and IFN-
), which are encoded by
over 20 intronless genes, and type II IFN, which includes one
structurally different single gene-encoded protein, namely IFN-
(1).
Whereas the biologically active factors belonging to type I IFN share
the same multimeric receptor (2, 3), IFN-
utilizes its own receptor
complex (4, 5). Both IFN membrane receptor complexes transduce
signals to intracellular compartments via the Janus kinase
(Jak)3-STAT signal
transduction pathway (6, 7). However, they share only Jak-1 and one
signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT1ß or STAT 91).
Type I IFNs are commonly defined as antiviral agents displaying
restricted immunomodulatory functions, whereas IFN-
is a well-known
immunomodulatory cytokine endowed with little antiviral
activities. Nevertheless, they share some biologic activities, such as
the ability to increase the recruitment of cytotoxic T cells, NK cells,
and phagocytes directed against virus-infected cells, tumor Ag-bearing
cells, or parasite-infected cells. This common effect seems to be
related to MHC class I-enhanced expression by IFN-treated APC (8).
Moreover, IFN-
and IFN-
inhibit IL-4-induced soluble CD23 and IgE
synthesis by human lymphocytes (9, 10). Both IFNs appear to favor Th1
development as well as Th1 response in human and murine cells (11, 12, 13, 14).
More precisely, priming of naive T cells with IFN-
promotes Th1
phenotype by decreasing IL-4 and IL-5 and by increasing IFN-
production (12, 13). Interestingly, IFN-
but not IFN-
stimulates
T cells for increased IL-10 production, a property shared by IL-12,
which is the best Th1-promoting cytokine (12, 15, 16, 17). Also, the
addition of IFN-
, IFN-
, or IL-12 to Ag-stimulated human PBMC
polarizes the immune response toward a type 1 cytokine profile (15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21).
Type I and II IFNs, however, exert differential activities on
monocytes. IFN-
is a proinflammatory cytokine in that it stimulates
TNF-
production, inhibits IL-10 release, and primes monocytes to
further enhance bacteria-induced IL-12 (22, 23, 24, 25) as well as TNF-
release (26). In contrast, IFN-
displays mainly
anti-inflammatory activities; it enhances IL-10 production by
activated macrophages, while decreasing IL-8 and GM-CSF secretion (15, 27, 28). Of note, type I IFNs may behave as a proinflammatory molecule,
since they have been reported to stimulate B cells, T cells, and
monocytes to secrete ISG15, an IFN-
-inducing factor (29).
Although type I IFNs are used clinically to treat patients suffering
from type 1 autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, their
precise mode of action has not yet been elucidated (30).
The aim of the present study was to examine the ability of IFN-
to
regulate the production of proinflammatory (TNF-
, IL-12) and
anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines by human monocytes stimulated
with bacterial products. Three considerations prompted us to compare
IFN-
with IFN-
: 1) the effects of IFN-
in this system have
been well documented, and IFN-
may therefore serve as a reference
(22, 23, 24, 25, 31); 2) IFN-
shares a number of important properties with
IFN-
including the ability to promote Th1 and inhibit Th2 responses
(11, 12, 13); and 3) although the receptor for IFN-
is entirely distinct
from that of IFN-
, the signaling molecules Jak-1 and STAT1ß are
used by both cytokines, and STAT1-deficient cells are unresponsive to
the two types of IFNs (4, 5, 6, 7, 32).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human recombinant IFN-
and -
were purchased from Genzyme
(Boston, MA). Staphylococcus aureus Cowan 1 strain (SAC) was
used at 1/10000 dilution (Pansorbin; Calbiochem-Behring, La Jolla, CA)
and LPS at 10 µg/ml (from Escherichia coli, serotype
0111:B4; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). Neutralizing anti-human
IL-10 mAb (clone 19F1.1) was used at 10 µg/ml and was purchased from
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). FITC-conjugated
mAb against CD14 and MHC class I (HLA-A, -B, and -C) were obtained,
respectively, from Becton Dickinson and Ancell (London, Ontario,
Canada). Phycoerythrin-conjugated mouse anti-human CD54 and MHC
class II (HLA-DP, -DQ, and -DR) mAb and nonconjugated anti-CD80 and
anti-CD86 were from Ancell. Unconjugated anti-CD58 was from
ATCC (clone TS2/9.1.4.3), and unconjugated anti-CD40 (mAb89) was
kindly provided by Dr. J. Banchereau (Schering-Plough, Dardilly,
France).
Cell preparation and culture conditions
Peripheral blood monocytes (>95% CD14+) were purified as previously described (33). Briefly, PBMC isolated from healthy donors by Ficoll-Hypaque centrifugation were cold aggregated and further depleted from T and NK cells by rosetting with 5-(2-aminoethyl)isothrouronium bromide (Aldrich Chemical, Milwaukee, WI)-treated SRBC.
All cultures were performed in serum-free HB101 medium (Irvine
Scientific, Santa Ana, CA) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 1 mM
sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES, 100 IU of penicillin, and 100 µg/ml
streptomycin. Enriched monocytes (2 x 105 cells for
TNF-
or 5 x 105 for IL-12p40, IL-12p70, and IL-10
production) were primed in 5-ml polystyrene tubes (Falcon Labware,
Oxnard, CA) overnight at 37°C in 500 µl of HB101 complete medium
containing 10 µg/ml polymyxin B, with or without 500 IU/ml IFN-
and/or 2500 IU/ml IFN-
. Cells were then washed once in HBSS
(BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) and stimulated with SAC or LPS in 1 ml
of culture medium. Culture supernatants were harvested after 24 h
for the measurement of TNF-
and after 48 h for the measurement
of IL-12p40, p70, and IL-10. In selected experiments, rat
anti-human IL-10 mAb or isotype-matched control rat mAb were used
at 10 µg/ml during both priming and stimulation.
Cytokine measurement
TNF-
was measured using a sandwich ELISA as previously
described (34). IL-10 was determined by a sandwich solid phase RIA
using anti-human IL-10 mouse mAb (clone 9D7) to coat the solid
phase and 125I-labeled mouse anti-human IL-10 mAb
(clone 12G8) as a detecting probe. IL-12p40 and IL-12p70 heterodimer
were measured with two different specific ELISAs using either
anti-IL-12p40 mAb (clone 2.4A1) or anti-complex IL-12p40/p35
mAb (clone 20C2) as capture Abs together with anti-IL-12p40 mAb
(clone 4D6) as a common second Ab (33). Anti-IL-12 mAbs were kindly
provided by Dr. M. Gately (Hoffmann-La Roche, Nutley, NJ). The
sensitivity of the assays was 50 pg/ml for TNF-
and IL-10 and 10
pg/ml for both IL-12p40 and p70.
Northern blot analysis
Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Santa
Clarita, CA). Fifteen micrograms of RNA per condition were resolved
using 1% formaldehyde agarose gel and blotted on pure nitrocellulose
membrane filter (Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH) followed by UV
cross-linking for immobilization. Membranes were probed under a 50%
formamide-based hybridization buffer also containing 5x sodium saline
citrate, 10% dextran sulfate, 1x Denhardts solution, 20 mM Tris, pH
7.5, 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA, and 0.5% SDS, then washed
for 2 h at 65°C under high stringency (0.1x SSC, 0.1% SDS)
before autoradiography. Human IL-12p35 and p40 cDNA probes, kindly
provided by U. Gubler (Hoffmann-LaRoche), were labeled with
[
-32P]dCTP using a commercial random oligolabeling kit
(Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). A cDNA probe specific for
ß-actin was used as a control to normalize the quantification.
Radioactivity was determined by autoradiography of nitrocellulose
membranes and analyzed by computer imaging (NIH Image 1.61, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
Flow cytometry analysis
Enriched monocytes were cultured overnight at 2.105
cells/vials in 500 µl of HB101 complete medium containing 10 µg/ml
of polymyxin B in the absence or presence of IFN-
or/and IFN-
.
Cells were then stained with the indicated mAb according to standard
techniques in the presence of normal human Ig (150 µg/ml) and
analyzed using a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). For
unconjugated mAb, an additional step of staining using a
FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 fragment of goat anti-mouse Abs
(Ancell) was performed following the manufacturers instructions.
Results are expressed as
median fluorescence intensity
(
MFI), which represent the median fluorescence intensity of cells
labeled with Abs of interest minus the median fluorescence intensity of
cells stained with isotype-matched control Abs.
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of n
independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by
using Students paired t test, when n
5;
or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, when n = 3.
Significant values are shown in figures as **** for
p
0.0001, *** for p
0.001, ** for
p
0.01, and * for p
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IFN-
priming on TNF-
and
IL-10 production in response to bacterial stimuli
Previous reports have indicated that LPS-induced IL-10 production
by human monocytes was suppressed by IFN-
, leading to enhanced
TNF-
production, and that IFN-
enhanced bacteria-induced
IL-10 (15, 22, 26). Here, we first show that pretreatment of
monocytes with IFN-
for
20 h significantly inhibits LPS-induced
TNF-
release (Fig. 1
A,
p = 0.018), whereas it fails to regulate LPS-induced
IL-10 secretion (Fig. 1
B). In contrast, priming with IFN-
significantly enhances LPS-induced IL-10 and TNF-
production (Fig. 1
A, p = 0.017; Fig. 1
B,
p = 0.015; Fig. 2
A). Most strikingly, IFN-
completely abrogates, in a dose-dependent manner, the effect of IFN-
priming on IL-10 production (Fig. 1B
, p = 0.033; Fig. 2
B), whereas IFN-
and IFN-
antagonize each other with
regard to TNF-
production (Fig. 1
A,
p = 0.043 and 0.009).
|
|
priming effect on
monokine production was also observed in response to SAC, another
commonly used bacterial stimulus. Surprisingly, we found that IFN-
does not prime for TNF-
(Fig. 1
primes monocytes for TNF-
production (Fig. 1
significantly antagonizes the IFN-
priming effect on TNF-
release (Fig. 1
completely suppresses the
IFN-
priming effect on IL-10 production (Fig. 1
, IFN-
, or IFN-
plus
IFN-
priming completely fails to trigger monokine release in the
absence of subsequent bacterial (i.e., LPS or SAC) stimulation (data
not shown).
These data demonstrate that: 1) pretreatment of monocytes with IFN-
alone supresses or fails to increase TNF-
production, while addition
of IFN-
significantly reverses this suppressive effect; and 2)
IFN-
and IFN-
, added at priming, differentially regulate and more
strikingly display antagonistic effects on IL-10 production in response
to LPS or SAC.
Role of endogeneous IL-10 in the failure of IFN-
to prime for
TNF-
production
IL-10 has been described as an inhibitory factor for TNF-
release by activated monocytes (35). According to our preliminary
kinetic studies, TNF-
and IL-10 are optimally detected after 24 and
48 h of monocyte stimulation, respectively. Because IFN-
significantly primes for IL-10 in response to SAC but not LPS (Fig. 1
, B and D), we examined whether the absence of
IFN-
priming on TNF-
secretion in SAC-stimulated monocytes (Fig. 1
C) may be explained by its strong induction of IL-10
release (Fig. 1
D). As shown in Table I
, pretreatment with IFN-
in the
presence of anti-IL-10 mAb significantly increases SAC-induced
TNF-
production (Table I
; p = 0.031), almost to the
same extent as IFN-
priming. As expected, addition of anti-IL-10
mAb during IFN-
priming does not enhance LPS-induced TNF-
release, while it significantly increases the priming effect of
IFN-
, further supporting the above data that IFN-
but not IFN-
priming increases LPS-induced IL-10 production (Fig. 1
B).
|
priming on TNF-
production by SAC-stimulated monocytes is IL-10 dependent, whereas its
inability to enhance LPS-induced TNF-
production is IL-10
independent.
Differential effect of IFN-
and IFN-
on IL-12p40 and IL-12p70
release
IL-10 was also reported to be a potent regulator of IL-12
production by activated monocytes (36). We therefore examined whether
IFN-
may differentially regulate LPS- or SAC-induced IL-12 release.
Because the production of IL-12p70 has been described as generally
following that of IL-12p40, we first measure IL-12p40 in 48-h culture
supernatants. Surprisingly, IFN-
priming significantly inhibits both
LPS- and SAC-induced IL-12p40 (Fig. 3
A, p = 0.002;
Fig. 3
B, p =
0.012). Furthermore, IFN-
strongly suppresses the IFN-
enhancement of IL-12p40 production in response to both stimuli (Fig. 3
A, p = 0.0003; Fig. 3
B,
p < 0.0001).
|
and IFN-
added together completely
antagonized each other for IL-10 production in response to both LPS and
SAC, we postulated that the opposite effect of IFN-
and IFN-
on
IL-12p40 release was not mediated by IL-10. This hypothesis was
confirmed by showing that the antagonism between IFN-
on IFN-
remains statistically significant in the presence of blocking
anti-IL-10 mAb (LPS stimulation, p = 0.032; SAC
stimulation, p = 0.011). However, addition of
anti-IL-10 mAb abrogates the inhibitory effect of IFN-
on
IL-12p40 production without conferring a priming effect (not detailed).
It is generally well accepted that IL-12p40 measurement is a good
reflection of the bioactive form of IL-12 (IL-12p70).
Nevertheless, Kincy-Cain and Bost have reported that substance P
stimulated murine macrophages to secrete IL-12p40 but not IL-12p70
(37). We therefore compared the effect of IFN-
and IFN-
priming
on the release of IL-12p70. Unexpectedly, although priming with IFN-
inhibits IL-12p40 release, it significantly enhances IL-12p70
production in both LPS- and SAC-stimulated monocytes (Fig. 4
A, p = 0.015 ; Fig. 4
B,
p = 0.016), albeit to a lesser extent than IFN-
(Fig. 4
A, p = 0.0001; Fig. 4
B,
p = 0.011).
|
and IFN-
, respectively. It is
worth noting that in response to LPS, the enhancing effect of
IFN-
remains higher than that of IFN-
, while in response
to SAC, both priming effects are similar, further supporting the above
data that 1) IFN-
primes monocytes to increase IL-10 release in
response to LPS (Fig. 1
primes monocytes to increase IL-10 release in response
to SAC (Fig. 1
The data in Figure 5
further
indicate that IFN-
significantly increases, in a dose-dependent
manner, the IFN-
-priming effect on LPS-induced IL-12p70 production,
while in the same culture supernatants, it antagonizes the
IFN-
-enhancing effect on IL-12p40 production. To investigate some of
the mechanisms underlying the opposite effect of IFN-
on LPS-induced
IL-12p40 and IL-12p70 protein release, we examined the regulatory
effect of IFN-
on the accumulation of IL-12p35 and IL-12p40 mRNA.
Northern blot analysis (Fig. 6
) shows
that 1) IFN-
primes monocytes for enhanced LPS-induced IL-12p40
(6-fold) and IL-12p35 (3-fold) mRNA, as reported by several
investigators (25, 31). Note that we failed to detect LPS-induced
IL-12p35 mRNA using this technique under serum-free medium culture
conditions; 2) IFN-
priming decreases IL-12p40 steady state mRNA
level and IL-12p40 secretion, with no detectable induction in IL-12p35
mRNA, but with an enhancement of IL-12p70 release; and 3) priming with
IFN-
does not modulate the regulatory priming effect of IFN-
on
IL-12p35 mRNA, whereas it decreases IFN-
-induced IL-12p40 mRNA. As
clearly shown in this figure, there is a discrepancy between the modest
(i.e., IFN-
, 2.2-fold) to large increase (IFN-
plus IFN-
,
24.7-fold) in IL-12p70 protein release in response to LPS and the
absence of regulation of IL-12p35 mRNA transcripts, suggesting
posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms by IFN-
for IL-12p35
expression.
|
|
and IFN-
on the expression of
accessory molecules by human monocytes
Our results indicate that IFN type I and type II possess
differential and antagonistic effects when added at priming on both
LPS- or SAC-induced TNF-
, IL-12p40, and IL-10 release. We therefore
examined whether these differential effects could also be observed on
the expression of surface molecules implicated in Ag presentation and T
cell activation. To address this question, enriched monocytes were
primed in presence of IFN-
, IFN-
, or both and analyzed for the
expression of different Ags as indicated in Figure 7
. The results show that IFN-
selectively enhances the expression of MHC class I as well as CD80
molecules on monocytes (Fig. 7
B), whereas it augments the
IFN-
-induced up-regulation of CD40 and MHC class I. However,
stimulation of monocytes with IFN-
but not IFN-
up-regulates the
expression of MHC class II, CD40, CD86, and CD54 (Fig. 7
A).
Of interest, IFN-
decreases CD14 expression.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-10,
and IL-12 release and that secretion of IL-12p40 may be dissociated
from that of IL-12p70 under the conditions of IFN-
priming. In
contrast to the well-described ability of IFN-
to prime for TNF-
and IL-12 (IL-12p40 and IL-12p70) production, priming with IFN-
before SAC stimulation significantly decreases IL-12p40, slightly
enhances IL-12p70, and strongly increases IL-10 production. The weak
IL-12p70 enhancement and the lack of priming for TNF-
are both
explained by endogeneous IL-10 production. Indeed, in the presence of
anti-IL-10 neutralizing mAb, the levels of SAC-induced IL-12p70 and
TNF-
production are similar to those achieved following IFN-
priming (Table I
appears quite similar in response to LPS (i.e., inhibition of
TNF-
and IL-12p40 and a weak increase in IL-12p70), these activities
are largely IL-10 independent, inasmuch as IFN-
fails to prime for
IL-10 production in such culture conditions. These results contrast
with the enhancing effect of IFN-
, when added during stimulation, on
LPS-induced IL-10 release by human monocytes (15).
As previously reported (22, 26), the addition of IFN-
during LPS
stimulation inhibits IL-10 production and increases TNF-
release. In
keeping with very recent studies (38), our data indicate that
pretreatment of monocytes with IFN-
significantly augments LPS- but
not SAC-induced IL-10 release. Of note, IFN-
priming further
enhances LPS- and SAC-induced TNF-
production, and it has been
reported that TNF-
may augment IL-10 secretion (39, 40). The
differential ability of IFN-
and IFN-
to prime for IL-10 release
according to the bacterial stimulus used is reminiscent of the
observation that IL-4 consistently inhibits monokine production in
response to LPS but is a less potent inhibitor or is inefficient in
response to SAC (36). Note that in the latter study, it was also
reported that the addition of IL-4 before bacterial stimulation primed
but did not inhibit IL-12 secretion.
A striking observation of the present report is that priming with
IFN-
inhibits LPS- or SAC-induced IL-12p40 release while increasing
IL-12p70 secretion (Figs. 3
and 4
). Several inhibitors of IL-12
production by human monocytes have been described: IL-4, IL-10, TGFß,
and PGE2 (41). With the exception of a few studies (37, 42), there was a constant parallelism between the level of IL-12p40 and
IL-12p70 protein release. Similarly, measles virus and anti-CD46
mAb have been shown to inhibit IL-12p40 and IL-12p70 monokine
production (43). Bioactive IL-12 (p70) is a heterodimer made up of two
chains (IL-12p40 and IL-12p35) encoded by two distinct genes; the p40
chain is always secreted in great excess over the heterodimer (44, 45).
Given that IL-12p40 (free and bound) and IL-12p70 have been detected by
two specific quantitative ELISAs and that the presence of an excess
amount of bioactive IL-12 (p70) did not interfere with IL-12p40
measurement and vice versa (unpublished observations), it was
tempting to speculate that IFN-
differentially regulates the
expression of the two IL-12 chains. First, we confirmed previous
reports indicating that IFN-
priming increases LPS-induced IL-12p40
and IL-12p35 mRNA accumulation and IL-12p40 and p70 secretion (31). In
contrast, IFN-
priming decreases the LPS-induced steady state
IL-12p40 mRNA level, with no detectable induction of IL-12p35 mRNA.
However, IFN-
priming enhances IL-12p70 protein secretion (2.2-fold
increase) and decreases IL-12p40 (0.4-fold). Finally, IFN-
does not
modulate the IFN-
-induced steady state IL-12p35 mRNA level, whereas
it significantly enhances IFN-
-induced IL-12p70 release.
Taken together, IFN-
priming (in the presence or absence of IFN-
)
increases IL-12p70 secretion and decreases IL-12p40 mRNA and protein
release without regulating steady state IL-12p35 mRNA level. This
suggest that IFN-
exerts translational or posttranslational
regulatory mechanisms on IL-12p35 expression as previously reported for
IFN-
and LPS (25). In keeping with these results, Snijders et
al. provided evidence that the production of bioactive IL-12p70 in
human monocytes may be determined by the expression of IL-12p35 subunit
(46).
Finally, in contrast to the present report, Biron and coworkers
reported that IFN-
negatively regulated IL-12 and IFN-
production
in vitro as well as in vivo (47). The previously undetected early IL-12
and IFN-
production in lymphocytic choriomeningitic virus
(LCMV)-infected control mice can be measured in LCMV-infected IFN-
receptor-deficient mice (48). At the present time, we do not have any
explanation for these apparent contradictory results. Of interest, in
those studies (47) IL-12p70 was measured by a bioassay using IFN-
production as a readout. In that regard, a novel IFN-
-inducing
factor different from IL-12, namely IL-18, has been recently described
(49).
IFN-
not only suppresses, in a dose-dependent manner, IFN-
priming for IL-12p40 but completely abrogates IFN-
enhancement of
LPS-induced IL-10 production (Fig. 1
). Vice versa, IFN-
totally
inhibits IFN-
priming of SAC-induced IL-10 release. The antagonism
between the two types of IFNs for the production of a major
monocyte-deactivating factor (i.e., IL-10) is reminiscent of the report
that IFN-
impaired IFN-
induction of NO synthase and release of
NO (50). Also, the additive effect of both IFNs on the secretion of a
proinflammatory cytokine (i.e., IL-12p70) may be biologically relevant
for the observed induction of type I autoimmune disorders as a side
effect of IFN-
therapy in human cancer (30). In that regard,
IFN-
-transgenic mice developed a hypoinsulinemic diabetes associated
with mixed inflammation that can be prevented by neutralizing Ab
to IFN-
(51).
However, IFN-
therapy appears to be effective in mice for
suppressing myasthenia gravis, in which it significantly decreases
antiacetylcholine serum Ab levels (52). In addition, IFN-ß (which
shares its receptor with IFN-
) is currently used for the treatment
of patients with multiple sclerosis (53). The anti-inflammatory
activity of IFN-ß was underlined by a down-regulation of TNF-
and
IFN-
and by up-regulation of TGFß (30). The present data
indicating that IFN-
priming increases IL-10 by monocytes, decreases
TNF-
, and only slightly up-regulates biologically active IL-12,
which may further up-regulates IL-10 secretion by T cells (17), would
support the beneficial use of IFN-
for Th1-like disease.
Nevertheless, IFN-
has also been shown to improve diseases
characterized by Th2 cells, including AIDS, hypereosinophilia, and
allergic diseases (30, 54). Our results showing that IFN-
increases
IL-12p70 may therefore be clinically relevant, especially for AIDS
patients in whom cells are inhibited in their ability to produce IL-12
(55, 56).
Finally, the present study shows that IFN-
up-regulates MHC class I
with no effect on constitutive or IFN-
-induced MHC class II and
selectively induces CD80 but not CD86 or CD54. Of note,
Chakrabarti et al. (57) reported that IFN-
induced CD86 and
CD54 in murine APC, while Ling et al. (58) showed that IFN-ß
displayed an antagonistic effect on IFN-
-induced MHC class II on
murine macrophages. Several reports indicated that B7 molecules (CD80
and CD86) provide the costimulation necessary for T cell proliferation
and IL-12-induced IFN-
production (59). However, some publications
have pointed out that CD80 stimulates a Th1 response, while CD86 favors
a Th2 response (60, 61), further supporting a role for IFN-
in the
induction of Th1 response (11, 12). Moreover, tumor expression of the
CD80 molecule may be superior to CD86 in the activation of cytotoxic
CD8+ T lymphocytes and tumor rejection (62). Therefore, the
ability of IFN-
to up-regulate MHC class II and CD80 and to
prime monocytes for IL-12 production may provide an additional
mechanism for the antitumor activity of IFN-
.
Taken together, our present results demonstrate that IFN-
priming
differentially affects monokine release in the presence or absence of
IFN-
, thus underlying their beneficial or deleterious effects in
various diseases according to the dose, the route, or the time of
administration (1).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M. Sarfati, University of Montreal, Louis-Charles Simard Research Center, 1560 Sherbrooke Street East, Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4 M1 Canada. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Jak, Janus kinase; SAC, Staphylococcus aureus Cowan I strain. ![]()
Received for publication September 8, 1997. Accepted for publication April 23, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
receptor into mouse cells: cloning and expression of its cDNA. Cell 60:225.[Medline]
/ß receptor: characterization and molecular cloning. Cell 77:391.[Medline]
receptor. Cell 76:793.[Medline]
/ß and -
signal transduction. Nature 366:129.[Medline]
and its receptor. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11:571.[Medline]
and
and prostaglandin E2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:6880.
, and IFN-
on the production of human IgE-binding factor (soluble CD23). J. Immunol. 142:134.[Abstract]
and
) exert opposite regulatory effects on the development of cytolytic potential by Th1 or Th2 human T cell clones. J. Immunol. 149:2977.[Abstract]
and IFN-
in IL-12-induced T helper cell-1 development. J. Immunol. 156:1442.[Abstract]
of immunoglobulin isotype selection and lymphokine production in mice. J. Exp. Med. 174:1179.
stimulates production of interleukin-10 in activated CD4+ T cells and monocytes. Blood 87:4731.
and interleukin-10. J. Exp. Med. 183:2559.
. J. Immunol. 157:1127.[Abstract]
selectively inhibits the production of interleukin-5 by human CD4+ T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 97:309.[Medline]
. J. Immunol. 157:12.[Abstract]
inhibits interleukin 10 production by monocytes. J. Exp. Med. 177:523.
and TNF-
. J. Exp. Med. 181:1615.
priming of monocytes enhances LPS-induced TNF production by augmenting both transcription and MRNA stability. Cytokine 7:427.[Medline]
in monocytic cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:147.
in human monocytes. J. Immunol. 155:1420.[Abstract]
in human bone marrow stromal cells: inhibition of hematopoietic growth factors and induction of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Blood 84:4142.
. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1198.
of lipopolysaccharide-inducible p35 and p40 genes. Blood 86:646.
secretion and triggering of TNF
release. J. Exp. Med. 180:1005.
production. J. Exp. Med. 181:537.
release in patients with allergic asthma. J. Immunol. 158:5560.[Abstract]
and cAMP elevating drugs. Int. Immunol. 7:517.
). Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9:17.[Medline]
/ß inhibition of interleukin 12 and IFN-
production in vitro and endogenously during viral infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:634.
ß, and TNF effects on antiviral state and NK cell responses during murine cytomegalovirus infection. J. Immunol. 156:4746.[Abstract]
-inducing factor (IGIF) is a costimulatory factor on the activation of Th1 but not Th2 cells and exerts its effect independently of Il-12. J. Immunol. 158:1541.[Abstract]
in transgenic mice. Science 260:1942.
therapy is effective in suppressing the clinical experimental myasthenia gravis. J. Immunol. 157:5675.[Abstract]
in response to HIV-1 as monocytes differentiate into macrophages: induction through a mechanism independent of double-stranded RNA. J. Immunol. 156:2481.[Abstract]
induces autoimmune T cells through the induction of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 and B7.2. J. Immunol. 157:522.[Abstract]
-induced expression of Ia antigen in murine macrophages. J. Immunol. 135:1857.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. C. Patel, K. H. Fisher, E. C. C. Yang, C. M. Deane, and R. E. Harrison Proteomic Analysis of Microtubule-associated Proteins during Macrophage Activation Mol. Cell. Proteomics, November 1, 2009; 8(11): 2500 - 2514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Binker, D. Y. Zhao, S. J. Y. Pang, and R. E. Harrison Cytoplasmic Linker Protein-170 Enhances Spreading and Phagocytosis in Activated Macrophages by Stabilizing Microtubules J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 3780 - 3791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Byrnes, D.-Y. Li, K. Park, D. Thompson, C. Mocilnikar, P. Mohan, J. P. Molleston, M. Narkewicz, H. Zhou, S. F. Wolf, et al. Modulation of the IL-12/IFN-{gamma} axis by IFN-{alpha} therapy for hepatitis C J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2007; 81(3): 825 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Bekeredjian-Ding, S. I. Roth, S. Gilles, T. Giese, A. Ablasser, V. Hornung, S. Endres, and G. Hartmann T Cell-Independent, TLR-Induced IL-12p70 Production in Primary Human Monocytes. J. Immunol., June 15, 2006; 176(12): 7438 - 7446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gautier, M. Humbert, F. Deauvieau, M. Scuiller, J. Hiscott, E. E.M. Bates, G. Trinchieri, C. Caux, and P. Garrone A type I interferon autocrine-paracrine loop is involved in Toll-like receptor-induced interleukin-12p70 secretion by dendritic cells J. Exp. Med., May 2, 2005; 201(9): 1435 - 1446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Alatrash, T. E. Hutson, L. Molto, A. Richmond, C. Nemec, T. Mekhail, P. Elson, C. Tannenbaum, T. Olencki, J. Finke, et al. Clinical and Immunologic Effects of Subcutaneously Administered Interleukin-12 and Interferon Alfa-2b: Phase I Trial of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma or Malignant Melanoma J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2004; 22(14): 2891 - 2900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tamai, S. Sugawara, O. Takeuchi, S. Akira, and H. Takada Synergistic effects of lipopolysaccharide and interferon-{gamma} in inducing interleukin-8 production in human monocytic THP-1 cells is accompanied by up-regulation of CD14, Toll-like receptor 4, MD-2 and MyD88 expression Innate Immunity, June 1, 2003; 9(3): 145 - 153. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M-C Wu, C-M Huang, J J. Tsai, H-Y Chen, and F-J Tsai Polymorphisms of the interleukin-4 gene in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Taiwan Lupus, January 1, 2003; 12(1): 21 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bouchonnet, N. Boechat, M. Bonay, and A. J. Hance Alpha/Beta Interferon Impairs the Ability of Human Macrophages To Control Growth of Mycobacterium bovis BCG Infect. Immun., June 1, 2002; 70(6): 3020 - 3025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Luft, P. Luetjens, H. Hochrein, T. Toy, K.-A. Masterman, M. Rizkalla, C. Maliszewski, K. Shortman, J. Cebon, and E. Maraskovsky IFN-{alpha} enhances CD40 ligand-mediated activation of immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells Int. Immunol., April 1, 2002; 14(4): 367 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Santini, C. Lapenta, M. Logozzi, S. Parlato, M. Spada, T. Di Pucchio, and F. Belardelli Type I Interferon as a Powerful Adjuvant for Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cell Development and Activity in Vitro and in Hu-Pbl-Scid Mice J. Exp. Med., May 15, 2000; 191(10): 1777 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Demeure, H. Tanaka, V. Mateo, M. Rubio, G. Delespesse, and M. Sarfati CD47 Engagement Inhibits Cytokine Production and Maturation of Human Dendritic Cells J. Immunol., February 15, 2000; 164(4): 2193 - 2199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vallin, A. Perers, G. V. Alm, and L. Ronnblom Anti-Double-Stranded DNA Antibodies and Immunostimulatory Plasmid DNA in Combination Mimic the Endogenous IFN-{alpha} Inducer in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus J. Immunol., December 1, 1999; 163(11): 6306 - 6313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Tam, C. Lim, J. Bard, and B. Pai Contact Hypersensitivity Responses Following Ribavirin Treatment In Vivo Are Influenced by Type 1 Cytokine Polarization, Regulation of IL-10 Expression, and Costimulatory Signaling J. Immunol., October 1, 1999; 163(7): 3709 - 3717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |