|
|
||||||||
Institute for Immunology, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B, and NF of activated T cells proteins was
abrogated, while transactivation by AP-1 proteins was even
enhanced. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of the IL-2 gene depends on an activation of both
coreceptor- and TCR-triggered signal-transduction pathways (for review,
see 8 . These influence the activities of the transcription
factors that mediate IL-2 transcription, namely
Oct,3 AP-1, NF-
B, and
NF-AT proteins (for review, see 9 . Protein kinase C is involved
in the activation of the NF-
B transcription factor proteins, which
requires their release from inactive cytoplasmic complexes (10, 11, 12, 13).
Members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase family regulate
expression and activity of AP-1 proteins (14, 15, 16). The
Ca/calmodulin-regulated Ser/Thr phosphatase 2B (PP2B)/calcineurin
regulates the nuclear entry of the cytoplasmic components of the
transcription factor NF-AT (17, 18, 19).
Additional phosphatases, namely okadaic acid-sensitive Ser/Thr phosphatases, were recently identified to be crucial for a cyclosporin A (CsA)-insensitive pathway, which is induced through the CD2 and CD28 coreceptors (6, 20, 21). Ser/Thr phosphatases are encoded by the gene families PPM and PPP. The PPP family comprises the subfamilies 1, 2A, 2B, and 5. The phosphatases of subfamilies 1, 2A, and 5 are sensitive to okadaic acid (22), while PP2B is inhibited by CsA.
During the CD2/CD28-induced signaling pathway, dephosphorylation of the
essential phosphoprotein pp19/cofilin is catalyzed by okadaic
acid-sensitive Ser/Thr phosphatases. Since dephosphorylation of
pp19/cofilin correlates with IL-2 production, we addressed the question
as to whether okadaic acid-sensitive Ser/Thr phosphatases influence the
expression of the IL-2 gene. In this study, we show that indeed
activities of okadaic acid-sensitive phosphatases are necessary to
achieve transactivation of the IL-2 promoter by the NF-AT, NF-
B, and
Oct transcription factor proteins.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human primary T cells were prepared as described previously
(21). EL4 cells and Jurkat cells were grown in RPMI supplemented with
5% (EL4) or 10% (Jurkat) FCS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 1%
penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). The
Jurkat cell clone IL-2-luc stably transfected with the plasmid
pIL-2luc2kb (23) was a gift from B. Schraven Institute for Immunology,
Heidelberg, Germany). EL4 cells were transfected, as described
previously (24), using 1 µg of plasmid DNA per 2 x
106 cells. The constructs used were pmoIL22k-luc,
pmoIL2321-luc, and the control vector pUC00luc; octp-luc,
NF
B-luc, NFAT-luc, and the control vector pGL2 (25); 5x TRE-TATA
CAT and the control vector TATA CAT (26); and 4x oct-luc and the
control vector 4x oct mut-luc (27). Sixteen hours after transfection,
cells were split in aliquots and treated with various stimulating
agents. The concentrations used were 0.5 µM okadaic acid (Life
Technologies); 0.1 µg/ml CsA (Sandoz, Basel, Switzerland); 10
ng/ml PMA (Sigma); 180 nM A23187 (Sigma); 10 µg/ml CD2 Abs M1, M2,
and 3PT (28, 29); and 1 µg/ml CD28 Ab 9.3 (PharMingen, San Diego,
CA).
Luciferase assay and CAT assay
Luciferase assays were performed with the Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI). CAT assays were conducted using CAT ELISA (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN).
Isolation of RNA and Northern analysis
RNA was extracted from cells by a guanidinium isothiocyanate method. Before loading on a 1% agarose gel (1% in 1x MOPS; 1x MOPS equals 20 mM MOPS (3-[N-morpholino]propanesulfonic acid, 5 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM EDTA)), RNA samples were adjusted to 25% formamide, 1.1 M formaldehyde, 0.5x MOPS, 0.5% Ficoll, and 0.1% bromphenol blue. After electrophoresis, gels were blotted onto Hybond N+ filters (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Prehybridization and hybridization were conducted at 65°C in solution HS (7% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5x phosphate buffer (1x phosphate buffer equals 2 M Na2HPO4·2H2O, 0.34% phosphoric acid)). For hybridization, cDNA probes (ß-actin, human IL-2, murine IL-2 (30, 31, 32)) were labeled radioactively using a random hexanucleotide priming procedure (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Blot washes (at 65°C) were performed with 0.04x phosphate buffer, 1 mM EDTA, 5% SDS, and 0.04x phosphate buffer, 1 mM EDTA, 1% SDS. Finally, the blots were exposed to autoradiography.
Nuclear run-on analysis
Nuclear run-on analysis was performed, as described previously (33), using cDNA probes for the ß-actin gene, the IL-2 gene, the c-jun gene, and the c-fos gene (30, 31, 34, 35) for the detection of the respective transcripts.
In vivo footprinting
In vivo footprinting was performed essentially as described
(36). The oligonucleotide primers used to visualize the coding strand
of the c-fos promoter were synthesized according to a
previous report (37). Quantitation of band intensities was performed
through scanning of the autoradiograms using a Saphir Ultra laser
densitometer. From top to bottom of each lane of the autoradiogram, an
intensity profile was produced using the Image Quant 3.0 software
(Fuji). Subsequently, the intensity values of individual profile peaks
were determined. Intensity values of affected bands were related to the
intensity value of a nonaffected band in the same area of the gel to
compensate for loading differences (relative intensity values). For
graph representation, relative intensity values obtained from an in
vitro methylated DNA band were set 1, and the relative intensity values
of corresponding bands in the four in vivo DNA preparations were
related to it. G-77 of the Oct site,
G-84 of the OAP site, G-138 and
G-140 of the NF-AT site, and G-152 and
G-154 of the AP-1 site were analyzed as individual bands,
while G-173 and G-174 of the ATGG site,
G-205, G-206, and G-207 of the
NF-
B site, and G-224 and G-225 of the
TGGGC site were pooled with neighboring bands. At the ATGG, NF-
B,
and TGGGC sites, in vivo methylated DNAs are hyperreactive when
compared with in vitro methylated DNA (Fig. 7
). This situation
occurring at the coding strand of the IL-2 promoter has been described
earlier. Its significance remains unknown (36).
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activation of human peripheral blood T lymphocytes (PBL-T) was performed using a combination of mitogenic Abs directed at the CD2 coreceptor or, alternatively, by phorbolester and Ca ionophore (PMA + A23187). CD2 triggering provides an activation signal to T cells (28, 38). Phorbolesters induce the activation of protein kinase C, whereas Ca ionophores lead to an elevation of intracellular calcium. This treatment mimics intracellular signals induced by antigenic stimulation of T cells via TCR/CD3 and coreceptors (39).
As expected, Northern blot analysis showed that both stimulation
protocols induced the accumulation of IL-2 mRNA (Fig. 1
, lanes 3 and 5),
which was prevented completely when okadaic acid was added 30 min
before stimulation at concentrations known to inhibit the okadaic
acid-sensitive Ser/Thr phosphatases of subfamilies 1, 2A, and 5 (22, 27, 40, 41) (Fig. 1
, lanes 4 and 6). This
treatment did not generally affect the functional activity of the
cells, since a nuclear run-on analysis (see below, Fig. 2
) revealed that other transcriptional
processes were ongoing throughout cell treatment.
|
|
Okadaic acid blocks IL-2 expression at the transcriptional level
We then analyzed the mechanisms underlying the inhibition of IL-2
expression by okadaic acid. Specifically, we addressed the question as
to whether okadaic acid treatment results in mRNA destabilization
and/or reduced mRNA synthesis. To discriminate between these
possibilities, the transcription rate of the IL-2 gene was determined
in nuclear run-on experiments (Fig. 2
).
To this end, PBL-T cells were activated through CD2 or by treatment
with PMA + A23187, in the presence or absence of okadaic acid. Both CD2
triggering and PMA + A23187 treatment induced transcription of the IL-2
gene (Fig. 2
, lanes 3 and 7, IL-2), which was
inhibited by okadaic acid (Fig. 2
, lanes 4 and 8,
IL-2). This effect was not due to a general down-regulation of
transcriptional processes by okadaic acid, since the ß-actin gene was
transcribed at similar levels in both groups of differently treated
cells (Fig. 2
, ß-actin). Moreover, transcription of the AP-1
transcription factors c-Fos and c-Jun, detectable in resting and
activated PBL-T cells (Fig. 2
, lanes 5 to 8), was
even strongly induced by okadaic acid (Fig. 2
, lanes 6 and
8).
To further elucidate the mechanisms underlying okadaic acid-mediated inhibition of IL-2 transcription, we performed IL-2 promoter studies using transient transfections of reporter gene constructs or the in vivo footprinting technique. Since PBL-T cells could not be used due to their limited experimental manipulability, the tumorigenic murine T lymphoma line EL4 and the human T cell line Jurkat were employed.
As shown before in PBL-T cells, the high level of IL-2 mRNA expression
detectable in PMA + A23187-activated cells (Fig. 3
, lanes 3 and 7)
was not induced in Jurkat and EL4 cells when the cells were activated
in the presence of okadaic acid (Fig. 3
, lanes 4 and 8). Thus, the
effects of okadaic acid on IL-2 expression are independent of
tumorigenic transformation and the differentiation state of the T cell
lines used in this study.
|
Similar results were obtained upon transient transfection of EL4 cells
with IL-2 promoter reporter constructs, in which the luciferase gene is
driven by the murine IL-2 promoter. Two IL-2 promoter luciferase
constructs containing either the 321-bp IL-2 enhancer (pmoIL2321-luc)
or 2-kb upstream sequence of the IL-2 gene (pmoIL22k-luc) and a
corresponding control vector were used (25). The transfected cells were
cultured with medium (-), okadaic acid (OA), PMA + A23187 (P/A), or a
combination of the three agents (P/A + OA), respectively. In EL4 cells
transfected with the control vector, only very low levels of luciferase
activity were detected, which were not altered significantly by cell
treatment (Fig. 4
, vector). Irrespective
of which of the two IL-2 promoter luciferase constructs was transfected
(Fig. 4
, -2k, -321), luciferase activity was slightly induced by
okadaic acid (Fig. 4
, OA) and, to a much higher level, by PMA + A23187
(Fig. 4
, P/A). Addition of okadaic acid completely inhibited the PMA +
A23187-inducible activity of both IL-2 promoter constructs (Fig. 4
, P/A
+ OA). Taken together, these data show that IL-2 transcription in
transformed murine and human T cell lines as well as in primary human
blood T cells is influenced strongly by okadaic acid-sensitive Ser/Thr
phosphatases.
|
Like okadaic acid, the PP2B/calcineurin inhibitor CsA prevents IL-2 expression via a transcriptional block (43). To exclude the possibility that the blocking activity of okadaic acid on IL-2 transcription was mediated via inhibition of PP2B/calcineurin, we analyzed whether the PP2B/calcineurin-independent pathway of IL-2 expression induced by a combination of PMA and the activating CD28 Ab 9.3 (44) could also be inhibited by okadaic acid.
To investigate this point, a Jurkat cell clone stably transfected with
the IL-2 enhancer luciferase reporter construct pIL-2luc2kb (23) was
stimulated by a combination of PMA plus CD28 Ab. This resulted in an
induction of luciferase activity, while treatment with each agent alone
led to no significant change in the basal level of luciferase activity
(Fig. 5
, compare lanes 1,
4, 5, and 6). Treatment with okadaic
acid, but not with CsA, completely abrogated the
PMA/anti-CD28-inducible promoter activity (Fig. 5
, lanes
7 and 8). In contrast, luciferase activity, induced by
a combination of phorbolester and Ca ionophore (Fig. 5
, lane
9), was prevented completely by both okadaic acid and CsA (Fig. 5
, lanes 10 and 11). These data show that okadaic
acid inhibits a PP2B/calcineurin-independent pathway involved in IL-2
expression.
|
B-, NF-AT-, but not AP-1-mediated transcription depends
on okadaic acid-sensitive Ser/Thr phosphatases
To determine whether okadaic acid differentially influences the
transactivation by individual transcription factors regulating IL-2
promoter activity, luciferase reporter constructs driven by multimeric
NF-AT-, NF-
B-, or Oct-binding elements derived from the IL-2
promoter (25) or the respective control vector were transfected into
EL4 cells. After transfection, cells were treated with okadaic acid
(OA), PMA + A23187 (P/A), or okadaic acid and PMA + A23187 (P/A + OA),
respectively. In the case of okadaic acid treatment of EL4 cells,
predominantly the Oct reporter was stimulated, whereas the extent of
NF-
B- and NF-AT-reporter induction was very low (Fig. 6
A, OA). PMA + A23187 treatment activated
the Oct-, NF-
B-, and NF-AT-reporter constructs (Fig. 6
A,
P/A), while application of okadaic acid inhibited the PMA +
A23187-inducible promoter activities of all three constructs
(Fig. 6
A, P/A + OA).
|
The AP-1 reporter contains a multimerized AP-1 binding site derived
from the human collagenase gene (26). The AP-1 reporter was induced by
okadaic acid (Fig. 6
C, OA) or PMA + A23187 treatment (Fig. 6
C, P/A), respectively. In contrast to the results obtained
with the Oct-, NF-
B-, and NF-AT-reporter constructs, simultaneous
addition of okadaic acid and PMA + A23187 further enhanced the activity
of the AP-1 reporter (Fig. 6
C, P/A + OA). These observations
imply that the inhibition of the Oct and NF-AT reporters derived from
the IL-2 promoter sequence (Fig. 6
A) is mediated by repression
of Oct and NF-AT activity, and not by inhibition of AP-1.
Determination of the in vivo occupancy of the IL-2 promoter in EL4 cells
To analyze the events at the endogenous IL-2 promoter that are
influenced by okadaic acid treatment, we used the in vivo footprinting
technique by which protein-DNA interactions in intact cells can be
visualized. To this end, EL4 cells were treated in culture with the
membrane-permeable alkylating agent DMS. After DMS treatment,
piperidine was used to produce DNA cleavage at alkylated G residues.
Resulting fragments spanning the IL-2 promoter region were visualized
by the ligation-mediated PCR technique (47), giving a G-specific
sequence ladder of the promoter. DMS footprints (i.e., protected or
hypersensitive G residues) indicative of protein binding to the DNA
were revealed by comparing the patterns of G-specific sequence ladders
obtained from differently stimulated living EL4 cell populations with
those obtained from purified and in vitro methylated genomic DNA of EL4
cells. PMA + A23187 treatment of EL4 cells resulted in a change of the
pattern of the G-specific sequence ladder as compared with the one
detected in unstimulated cells (Fig. 7
, compare lanes 2 and
4). Footprints (i.e., reproducible changes of band
intensities of at least 25%), as described before (36), were visible
within the coding strand at the Oct site (protection at
G-77), the OAP site (protection at G-84), the
proximal NF-AT site (protection at G-138 and
hypersensitivity at G-140), the AP-1 site
(hypersensitivities at G-152 and G-154), the
ATGG site (protections at G-173 and G-174),
the NF-
B site (protections at G-205,
G-206, and G-207), the TGGGC site
(protections at G-224 and G-225), and the
distal NF-AT site (protection at G-285 and
hypersensitivity at G-287) (Fig. 7
, lane 4).
Okadaic acid treatment of EL4 cells alone reproducibly induced a
protection at G-77 within the Oct site, at
G-84 within the OAP site, and two hypersensitivities at
G-152 and G-154 indicative of protein binding
to the AP-1 site of the IL-2 promoter (Fig. 7
, lane 3). This
observation correlated with the induction of low levels of IL-2
expression under these conditions (compare Fig. 3
and 42 as well
as with the induction of AP-1 expression (compare Fig. 2
) and activity
(compare Fig. 6
C) in okadaic acid-treated cells.
Surprisingly, binding of Oct and AP-1 proteins seemed to be sufficient
to induce a low level of IL-2 transcription.
The IL-2 promoter of cells treated with PMA + A23187 in the
presence of okadaic acid showed no footprints at all (Fig. 7
, lane 5). Thus, in PMA + A23187 plus okadaic acid-treated EL4
cells also AP-1 proteins, although activated (compare Fig. 6
C, P/A + OA), do not bind to the IL-2 promoter. The
absence of footprints at the IL-2 promoter was gene specific since the
cellular c-fos promoter was still occupied under these
conditions. Thus, in vivo footprinting of the same DNA preparations, as
used for the IL-2 promoter analysis, revealed the characteristic
footprint pattern at the SRE binding region of the c-fos
promoter (data not shown) (37).
These data demonstrate that okadaic acid completely prevents transcription factor binding to the IL-2 promoter in PMA + A23187-stimulated EL4 cells.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Interestingly, okadaic acid treatment differentially affects the
potencies of individual transcription factors regulating IL-2
transcription. Thus, while okadaic acid inhibits NF-
B-, Oct-, and
NF-AT-mediated transactivation processes during T cell activation, AP-1
activity is even enhanced.
Okadaic acid treatment enhances AP-1 activity through an induction of
the expression of AP-1 proteins (Fig. 2
; see also 49 .
Unexpectedly, this AP-1 expression was still detectable at late times
after activation. In both activated and nonactivated PBL-T cells,
okadaic acid treatment resulted in a high transcription rate of AP-1
genes 6 h after stimulation (see Fig. 2
). Okadaic acid treatment
rapidly induces expression of the AP-1 genes c-fos,
c-jun, junB, and junD in EL4 cells.
This expression was still detectable 8 h after stimulation
(unpublished data). This kinetics of the AP-1 expression differs from
that under other experimental conditions of T cell activation, in which
AP-1 expression occurs as an early event followed by a rapid shut-off
(see Ref. 9 for summary). At present, the regulation of this shut-off
is not well understood. One explanation for the AP-1 expression pattern
in T cells described in this study could be that okadaic acid-sensitive
phosphatases are also involved in the down-regulation of AP-1
expression.
In activated T cells, IL-2 transcription was inhibited completely by
okadaic acid. AP-1 activity, which was enhanced under these conditions,
was clearly not sufficient to overcome the inhibitory effect of okadaic
acid on the IL-2 promoter. This could be based on the finding that IL-2
transcription seems to depend on the binding of a complete set of
transcription factors to the promoter (36), most likely because the
IL-2 promoter contains nonconsensus binding sites that favor
cooperative transcription factor binding (24). Then, AP-1 proteins,
although induced, could not transactivate the IL-2 promoter because
their binding affinities toward the nonconsensus AP-1-binding elements
would not be strong enough under conditions in which Oct, NF-
B, and
NF-AT activities are missing. Indeed, in vivo footprinting analysis
(Fig. 7
) showed that the IL-2 promoter in okadaic acid-treated EL4
cells stimulated with PMA + A23187 is not occupied, indicating that
transcription was blocked due to complete inhibition of activator
binding. Moreover, no evidence for binding of repressor proteins to the
IL-2 promoter was found.
In nonactivated EL4 cells, however, okadaic acid treatment led to low
expression of IL-2. Note that this was the case only in EL4 cells, not
in the other transformed and nontransformed T cells analyzed in this
study. Okadaic acid-induced IL-2 expression in EL4 cells correlated
with footprints only at the Oct site (G-77), at the
noncomposite AP-1 site at nucleotides G-152 and
G-154, and at the OAP site (G-84) that is
bound by AP-1 proteins (46) (compare Fig. 7
). Thus, in nonactivated EL4
cells, Oct and AP-1 proteins can induce transcription at the IL-2
promoter in the absence of other transcription factors.
One possibility to explain the opposite effects of okadaic acid on IL-2
transcription in activated and nonactivated EL4 cells could be that the
accessibility of the IL-2 promoter is different. Since the binding of
AP-1 proteins to the IL-2 promoter (Fig. 7
) is distinct in activated
and nonactivated EL4 cells while transactivating capacities of AP1
proteins are detectable in both states (Fig. 6
C), perhaps
this means that, comparable with the situation that is found at a
growing number of cellular promoters (50, 51), the activity of the IL-2
promoter is regulated by its nucleosomal architecture as well. In this
case, T cell activation would induce the establishment of an open form
of IL-2 promoter packaging. The inhibition of okadaic acid-sensitive
phosphatases during activation may either alter or disturb this
process. At present, it is not clear whether, and if so how, okadaic
acid treatment induces (in activated EL4 cells) or fixes (in other T
cells) a promoter structure similar to the one in resting T cells that
does not permit access of single transcription factors (36).
Alternatively, simultaneous cell activation and okadaic acid treatment
may establish a new inhibitory form of IL-2 promoter packaging. Taken
together, the characteristic features of IL-2 transcription in EL4
cells indicate that besides transcription factor activity, changes of
the chromatin structure are probably involved in the regulation of IL-2
expression in T cells.
The signaling pathway investigated in this study does not involve
PP2B/calcineurin. Thus, inhibition of okadaic acid-sensitive Ser/Thr
phosphatases abrogated both the PP2B/calcineurin-dependent and
independent pathways of IL-2 expression (Fig. 5
). The similarities of
the effects of okadaic acid and the PP2B/calcineurin inhibitor CsA are,
however, remarkable: loss of activator binding to the IL-2 promoter was
also observed when cells were stimulated in the presence of CsA (36).
CsA is known to block NF-AT activation and, in addition, to exert
inhibitory effects on Oct and NF-
B proteins (17, 46, 52). As shown
in this study, okadaic acid also inhibits NF-AT, Oct, and NF-
B
activities (Fig. 6
A). One conclusion from these observations
is to predict a convergence of the pathways depending on okadaic
acid-sensitive Ser/Thr phosphatases and on PP2B/calcineurin. Perhaps
this occurs downstream of PP2B/calcineurin, since there is evidence
that PP2B/calcineurin may activate the type 1 Ser/Thr phosphatase PP1
by inactivation of the PP1 inhibitor 1 (53).
The dependency of IL-2 transcription on okadaic acid-sensitive phosphatases is conserved during tumorigenic transformation and evolution, since the inhibitory effect of okadaic acid was observed in nontransformed primary human T cells as well as in malignant T cell lines from mice and humans. This stresses the importance of these phosphatases for the regulation of IL-2 expression. Future work should focus on the identification of the individual phosphatases and proteins targeted by them. In this regard, the essential actin-binding protein pp19/cofilin has been identified as one of the substrates of okadaic acid-sensitive phosphatases. Dephosphorylation and nuclear translocation of pp19/cofilin as a consequence of costimulatory signals correlate with the induction of IL-2 production (20). Whether effects of cofilin on the nucleoskeleton are involved in changes of the chromatin structure influencing transcriptional activation remains to be determined.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprints to Dr. Gabriele Nebl, Institute for Immunology, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Oct, octamer; AP-1, activator protein-1; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyl transferase; CsA, cyclosporin A; NF-AT, nuclear factor of activated T cells; NF-
B, nuclear factor-
B; OAP, octamer-1-associated protein; PBL-T, peripheral blood T lymphocytes. ![]()
Received for publication December 19, 1997. Accepted for publication April 17, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B subunit regulation in nontransformed CD4+ T lymphocytes. Science 256:1452.
B: a lesson in family values. Cell 80:529.[Medline]
chain of the TCR/CD3/
complex. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:2841.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Martin, M. Potente, V. Janssens, D. Vertommen, J.-C. Twizere, M. H. Rider, J. Goris, S. Dimmeler, R. Kettmann, and F. Dequiedt Protein phosphatase 2A controls the activity of histone deacetylase 7 during T cell apoptosis and angiogenesis PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4727 - 4732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-W. Shui, M. C.-T. Hu, and T.-H. Tan Conditional Knockout Mice Reveal an Essential Role of Protein Phosphatase 4 in Thymocyte Development and Pre-T-Cell Receptor Signaling Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2007; 27(1): 79 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Wabnitz, G. Nebl, M. Klemke, A. J. Schroder, and Y. Samstag Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Functions as a Ras Effector in the Signaling Cascade That Regulates Dephosphorylation of the Actin-Remodeling Protein Cofilin after Costimulation of Untransformed Human T Lymphocytes J. Immunol., February 1, 2006; 176(3): 1668 - 1674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Madrenas, L. A. Chau, W. A. Teft, P. W. Wu, J. Jussif, M. Kasaian, B. M. Carreno, and V. Ling Conversion of CTLA-4 from Inhibitor to Activator of T Cells with a Bispecific Tandem Single-Chain Fv Ligand J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 5948 - 5956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Smith, I. Collins, G. V. R. Chandramouli, W. G. Butscher, E. Zaitseva, W. J. Freebern, C. M. Haggerty, V. Doseeva, and K. Gardner Targeting Combinatorial Transcriptional Complex Assembly at Specific Modules within the Interleukin-2 Promoter by the Immunosuppressant SB203580 J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 41034 - 41046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Salazar Murphy and C. C. W. Hughes Endothelial Cells Stimulate T Cell NFAT Nuclear Translocation in the Presence of Cyclosporin A: Involvement of the wnt/Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3{beta} Pathway J. Immunol., October 1, 2002; 169(7): 3717 - 3725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Wang, R. A. Kirken, R. A. Erwin, C.-R. Yu, and W. L. Farrar JAK3, STAT, and MAPK Signaling Pathways as Novel Molecular Targets for the Tyrphostin AG-490 Regulation of IL-2-Mediated T Cell Response J. Immunol., April 1, 1999; 162(7): 3897 - 3904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |