|
|
||||||||


Departments of
*
Medicine and Physical Therapy, and
Bioregulatory Function, University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;
Department of Pediatrics, National Mie Hospital, Mie, Japan; and
§
Department of Pathology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R. These observations reveal the novel finding that
sIgA is able to stimulate basophils as well as eosinophils. Since sIgA
is the most abundant Ig isotype in the secretions from mucosal tissues,
and basophils are active participants in allergic late-phase reactions,
sIgA-mediated basophil mediator release is potentially involved in
exacerbation of the inflammation associated with allergic
disorders. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RI)
on their surface and contain potent vasoactive amines in their
granules. When the surface-bound IgE is cross-linked by specific
multivalent Ags, basophils release granule-associated mediators as well
as newly synthesized mediators such as leukotriene
(LT)3 C4 (1).
Through the release of these proinflammatory mediators, basophils play
an active role in allergic reactions in concert with mast cells.
Although basophils and mast cells show remarkable similarities, such as
the possession of Fc
RI and granule histamine, and their
histochemical properties, these two cell types belong to distinct cell
lineage. Substantial evidence has indicated that the cells most closely
related to basophils are eosinophils (reviewed in 2 . Tissue
eosinophilia is a fundamental trait of allergic diseases in which
infiltrated eosinophils appear to play a key role (3). Similarly, an
increasing body of evidence indicates that basophils represent another
type of proinflammatory cells involved in the pathogenesis of allergic
disorders. The role of basophils in allergic reactions has become more
apparent with the recognition and understanding of allergic late-phase
reactions (LPRs) (1, 2). Basophils and basophil-derived mediators have
been identified in a number of LPRs induced by experimental Ag
challenge in patients with nasal (4, 5) or bronchial hypersensitivity
(6, 7). Pivotal roles of IgE in the activation of basophils have been well established, but secretory IgA (sIgA) is the most abundant Ig isotype in the mucosal tissues, in which a variety of allergic inflammatory cells such as eosinophils and basophils exert their effector functions. The dimeric IgA and J chain are locally synthesized by plasma cells located in the lamina propria of the mucous membranes. After binding to a secretory component (SC), which is produced by epithelial cells, sIgA is transported into the epithelial lining fluid. In vitro studies demonstrate that sIgA stimulates eosinophils to undergo degranulation (8), indicating that sIgA plays an important triggering role in eosinophil activation. On the other hand, to date there has been no information regarding any possible role for sIgA in basophil activation. Given the potential importance of sIgA and basophils in allergic inflammation, we decided to conduct analyses designed to detect sIgA-induced basophil mediator release. In the present study, we demonstrate that immobilized sIgA, but not IgA, induces mediator release from IL-3-primed basophils.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human rIL-3, IL-5, and granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF) were kindly donated by Kirin Brewery (Tokyo, Japan), Suntory Institute of Biomedical Research (Osaka, Japan), and Sumitomo Pharmaceutical (Tokyo, Japan), respectively. Purified human IgA preparations, i.e., serum IgA, myeloma IgA, and sIgA, were obtained from Cappel-Organon Teknika (West Chester, PA). Goat anti-human IgE was purchased from Medical Biologic Laboratory (Nagoya, Japan). sIgA was divided into Fab and (Fc)2·SC fragments Fab-sIgA and (Fc)2·SC-sIgA, respectively) by enzyme digestion using IgA protease from Clostridium ramosum (9). Human free SC was purified from pooled colostrum by heparin Sepharose column chromatography, followed by gel filtration, as described elsewhere (10).
Buffer
PIPES A buffer contained 25 mM PIPES (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 119 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, and 0.03% human serum albumin, and it was adjusted to pH 7.4. For stimulation of basophils and eosinophils, PIPES A containing 2 mM Ca2+ and 0.5 mM Mg2+ (PIPES ACM) was used, unless otherwise indicated.
Preparation of protein-conjugated Sepharose beads
Protein-conjugated Sepharose beads were prepared, as described elsewhere (11). In brief, cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose 4B beads (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) were swollen in 1 mM HCl and washed with borate buffer (0.2 M H3BO3, 0.5 M NaCl, and 0.02 M NaOH, pH 8.6). Proteins, dissolved in borate buffer, were added to the beads at 10 mg/ml of packed beads, and this was stirred overnight at 4°C. On the next day, the beads were washed at least three times in borate buffer and blocked with 0.1 M lysine monohydrochloride, pH 8.6, in borate buffer for 2 h at room temperature. Finally, the beads were washed alternately in borate buffer and 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 4) and stored at 4°C in borate buffer until use. Greater than 85% of the total protein was bound to the beads, as determined by OD measurement of the supernatants and washes.
Cell preparation
Human basophils and eosinophils were isolated from venous blood obtained from consenting volunteers with no history of atopic diseases. For most of our experiments, semipurified basophils were prepared. In brief, anticoagulated blood was overlaid on isotonic Percoll solutions having different densities (1.079 and 1.070 g/ml). After centrifugation at 700 x g for 15 min at room temperature, cell bands between the two Percoll solutions were collected. For some experiments, the basophils were purified further by an additional isolation step of negative panning selections using anti-CD2, anti-CD14, anti-CD16, and anti-CD19 Abs, as reported previously (12). The purity of semipurified and highly purified basophil preparations was 16% (range, 8-30%) and 72% (range, 60-83%), respectively. Both basophil preparations contained virtually no eosinophils. Their viability measured by the trypan blue exclusion test was consistently >95%.
Eosinophils were purified by Percoll density centrifugation, followed by negative selections using anti-CD16-bound micromagnetic beads and a magnetic activated cell sorter column, as previously described (13). The purity of eosinophils was more than 99%.
Mediator release from basophils
Histamine and LTC4 release by soluble reagents was performed as previously described (14). Mediator release by protein-conjugated Sepharose beads was performed as follows. Based on the density of basophils, assessed by Alcian blue stain, the number of added beads was calculated to adjust the designated ratio of beads to basophils (shown as bead:cell ratio in the figures) in each sample. To increase the opportunity of direct contact between the cells and beads during basophil stimulation, cells suspended with beads (300 µl total) were immediately centrifuged at 50 x g for 8 min at 4°C, transferred to a water bath, and incubated without agitation at 37°C for 45 min, unless otherwise stated. At the end of the incubation, the samples were chilled on ice, and 200 µl of ice-cold PIPES A was added to each sample. After centrifugation, the supernatants were collected and stored at 4°C. The concentration of histamine in supernatants was measured using an automated fluorometric technique. LTC4 was quantified using an ELISA kit (Bühlmann Laboratories AG, Schönenbuch, Switzerland), according to the manufacturers instruction.
In each experiment, the total content and spontaneous release of histamine were analyzed. The histamine in the supernatants of basophil preparations incubated with OVA (Sigma)-coated beads was referred to spontaneous release (consistently <5%). Histamine release was expressed as a percentage of the total cellular histamine after subtracting the spontaneous release. Experiments were performed at least in duplicate.
Mediator release from eosinophils
Nonprimed eosinophils were stimulated similarly to basophils, except that the cells were stimulated for 4 h at 37°C, as previously described (11). Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) in supernatants was measured using an RIA kit (Pharmacia). EDN release was calculated based on the same formula as histamine release. Experiments were performed at least in duplicate.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of the differences between various treatment groups was assessed by Students t test (paired).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We first tested the direct effect of soluble sIgA on basophil
histamine release, but no significant release was initiated by sIgA
over a wide range of concentrations. To further determine whether sIgA
is capable of activating human basophils, we tested the effect of
immobilized sIgA on basophils. Based on our previous findings that
hemopoietic growth factors such as IL-3 prime basophils for increased
releasability (15), semipurified basophils were pretreated with or
without IL-3 (5 ng/ml) for 30 min and then incubated with
sIgA-conjugated Sepharose beads for 45 min at various bead:cell ratios.
As shown in Figure 1
, nontreated
basophils showed little or no histamine release at all tested bead:cell
ratios. In IL-3-primed basophils, however, apparent histamine release
was elicited by immobilized sIgA, depending on the bead:cell ratio.
Approximately 15% of histamine release was obtained at a high ratio
(1:10) of sIgA-coated beads to basophils. Five to ten percent of
release occurred at a bead-to-cell ratio of 1:20-40.
|
|
|
5%) was observed
after 5 min of stimulation with sIgA (Fig. 4
|
|
To examine whether the degranulation evoked by sIgA is dependent
on extracellular Ca2+ or Mg2+, IL-3-treated
basophils were stimulated with sIgA in PIPES A buffer (no
Ca2+, no Mg2+), PIPES A supplemented with
either Ca2+ (no Mg2+) or Mg2+ (no
Ca2+), or PIPES ACM buffer (Fig. 6
). In the absence of both
Ca2+ and Mg2+, sIgA caused nearly no histamine
release. sIgA-induced histamine release was also very weak in buffer
supplemented with either Ca2+ or Mg2+ alone
(
35% of the maximal release observed in the presence of
Ca2+ and Mg2+), suggesting that sIgA-induced
histamine release is dependent on both Ca2+ and
Mg2+. On the other hand, basophil histamine release
triggered by anti-IgE Ab was mostly dependent on exogenous
Ca2+, but not on Mg2+, since it was not
impaired in the absence of Mg2+.
|
In addition to preformed mediators, basophils can liberate newly
synthesized mediators, such as LTC4, upon appropriate
stimulation (16). As shown in Figure 7
,
immobilized sIgA also induced statistically significant release of
LTC4 from IL-3-primed basophils, and the amount of released
LTC4 was approximately one-half of that released from
IL-3-primed, anti-IgE-stimulated basophils. Although
LTC4 release was observed in primed basophils from almost
all donors, nonprimed cells from some donors (four of nine donors)
released a comparable amount of LTC4. This suggests that
priming with IL-3 is not required for sIgA-induced LTC4
generation in some, but not all, donors.
|
To elucidate the mechanisms underlying sIgA-mediated basophil
activation, we tested the effects of IgA, SC, Fab fragment, or
(Fc)2·SC fragment of sIgA on the degranulation of
basophils as well as eosinophils. Consistent with the previous reports
by others (8, 11), we observed that stimulation with immobilized
preparations of serum IgA, myeloma IgA, or sIgA resulted in a
significant release of EDN from human eosinophils (Fig. 8
), and that the percentages of EDN
release by the IgA preparations were similar to those in published
reports (8, 11). It should be mentioned that sIgA induced statistically
significantly more EDN release than serum IgA or myeloma IgA. On the
other hand, in basophils, neither serum IgA nor myeloma IgA induced any
histamine release. Although the Fab fragment of sIgA caused no basophil
degranulation, apparent release was induced by the
(Fc)2·SC fragment of sIgA, suggesting that the
(Fc)2·SC portion is important for sIgA-mediated basophil
activation. However, immobilized preparations of SC induced weak, but
not statistically significant degranulation of IL-3-primed basophils as
well as eosinophils.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the most striking findings in our study is that sIgA-induced
degranulation of basophils was totally dependent on pretreatment with
IL-3 (Fig. 1
). Furthermore, sequence of addition of IL-3 and sIgA was
crucial for sIgA-mediated histamine release (Fig. 3
): IL-3 acts as a
priming factor, and sIgA as a secretagogue that requires priming with
IL-3. The priming effect of IL-3 on mature basophils was reported
initially by us (12) and others (25): pretreatment (
15 min) of
basophils with IL-3 results in enhancement of histamine release evoked
by diverse stimuli including anti-IgE. In the present study, only a
negligible response to sIgA was observed in IL-3 nontreated basophils,
indicating that stimulation with sIgA is unable to transduce signals
sufficient for degranulation, and IL-3 renders basophils susceptible to
stimulation with sIgA. Similar phenomena have been reported for several
secretagogues, such as C3a (25) and platelet-activating factor (26).
Even picomolar concentrations of IL-3 were sufficient to induce a
qualitative change in the response of basophils to sIgA (Fig. 5
),
indicating that the effect of IL-3 is exerted via high affinity IL-3R.
Furthermore, IL-5 and GM-CSF also induced sIgA-mediated basophil
degranulation (Fig. 5
), indicating that intracellular signaling is
mediated via the promiscuous ß-chain of the receptors. IL-3, IL-5,
and GM-CSF exert many other activities on basophils, including
induction of migration (12), adherence to the endothelium (27),
prolongation of survival (28), and augmentation of cytokine generation
(29). These basophil-active cytokines are produced by Th2 lymphocytes,
which are predominant cells at the sites of allergic inflammation.
Therefore, the local production of these cytokines at sites of ongoing
allergic reactions may contribute to the pathogenesis of local allergic
responses through promotion of a wide array of basophil functions,
possibly including sIgA-induced degranulation.
The results of our study suggest that human basophils possess
functional binding sites for sIgA. At present, we have not directly
identified the binding sites for sIgA on basophils, partly because of
the difficulty in preparing a large number of pure basophils. Although
the (Fc)2·SC fragment, but not the Fab fragment, of sIgA
induced basophil degranulation (Fig. 8
), the binding sites of sIgA are
surmised to be distinct from Fc
R (CD89) for the following reasons.
First, no significant histamine release was induced by immobilized
monomeric IgA in the present study (Fig. 8
). Second, flow-cytometric
analysis did not detect CD89 on basophils (30). Finally, histamine
release by immobilized sIgA was not antagonized in the presence of
soluble serum IgA at up to 250 µg/ml (data not shown). These results
indicate that the binding sites of the (Fc)2·SC portion
of sIgA differ from Fc
R. On the other hand, sIgA is also capable of
causing degranulation of eosinophils, which express Fc
R (31).
However, eosinophil degranulation by sIgA is not mediated merely via
binding to Fc
R(s). Previous observations by others (8, 11) and our
present data (Fig. 8
) showed that sIgA always induces a higher
magnitude of EDN release than IgA. In addition, eosinophil superoxide
production initiated by sIgA was only partially inhibited by treatment
with anti-Fc
R Ab, whereas IgA-mediated superoxide production was
completely abolished (32). These observations strongly indicate that
sIgA transduces intracellular signals in eosinophils via two different
pathways: Fc
R and an undetermined binding site(s) for sIgA. A
substantial body of evidence indicates that basophils share a number of
common surface structures with eosinophils (2). Presumably,
sIgA-mediated activation of basophils is exerted through the
undetermined binding site(s) for sIgA, identical with that on
eosinophils. The existence of receptors/binding sites for SC has been
reported in eosinophils (33). Although we failed to observe significant
induction of degranulation of IL-3-primed basophils by immobilized SC,
a binding site for SC could be a candidate for the functional binding
site for sIgA on basophils. Because we cannot deny the possible
involvement of a binding site on the Fc portion of sIgA other than
CD89, which might transduce costimulatory signals in sIgA-mediated
basophil degranulation, further functional and molecular biologic
analyses of the binding sites of IgA/sIgA on eosinophils and basophils
will be helpful to explain the mechanisms underlying sIgA-induced
basophil degranulation.
In this study, we did not define the subclass of IgA preparations. Theoretically, all IgA preparations, including myeloma IgA, consist of mixtures of both IgA1 and IgA2. Serum IgA is enriched in IgA1, whereas sIgA is enriched in IgA2. However, we do not think that a difference in the subclass of IgA is the cause of the different responses of basophils to various IgA preparations for the following two reasons. First, an early report (8) demonstrated that there was no difference in EDN release from eosinophils in response to IgA1 and IgA2. Second, basophils were not stimulated by the beads coated with high concentrations of serum IgA, which contains about 10% IgA2.
In summary, we have demonstrated for the first time that sIgA induces mediator release from human basophils. sIgA-induced basophil degranulation requires priming with basophil-active cytokines, such as IL-3. Because sIgA is the most abundant Ig isotype in mucus secretions, and basophils at the sites of allergic inflammation are perceived to be activated by these cytokines, sIgA-mediated basophil mediator release may play an important role in the exacerbation of allergic inflammation of mucosal surfaces.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Koichi Hirai, Department of Bioregulatory Function, University of Tokyo School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: LT, leukotriene; EDN, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage CSF; LPR, late-phase reaction; SC, secretory component; sIgA, secretory Ig A. ![]()
Received for publication January 26, 1998. Accepted for publication April 6, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R). Crit. Rev. Immunol. 16:423.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Shiratori, M. Yamaguchi, M. Suzukawa, K. Yamamoto, L. L. Lanier, T. Saito, and H. Arase Down-Regulation of Basophil Function by Human CD200 and Human Herpesvirus-8 CD200 J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4441 - 4449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Decot, G. Woerly, M. Loyens, S. Loiseau, B. Quatannens, M. Capron, and D. Dombrowicz Heterogeneity of Expression of IgA Receptors by Human, Mouse, and Rat Eosinophils J. Immunol., January 15, 2005; 174(2): 628 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iikura, M. Ebisawa, M. Yamaguchi, H. Tachimoto, K. Ohta, K. Yamamoto, and K. Hirai Transendothelial Migration of Human Basophils J. Immunol., October 15, 2004; 173(8): 5189 - 5195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pilette, S. R. Durham, J.-P. Vaerman, and Y. Sibille Mucosal Immunity in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Role for Immunoglobulin A? Proceedings of the ATS, April 1, 2004; 1(2): 125 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pilette, Y. Ouadrhiri, V. Godding, J-P. Vaerman, and Y. Sibille Lung mucosal immunity: immunoglobulin-A revisited Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2001; 18(3): 571 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iikura, M. Miyamasu, M. Yamaguchi, H. Kawasaki, K. Matsushima, M. Kitaura, Y. Morita, O. Yoshie, K. Yamamoto, and K. Hirai Chemokine receptors in human basophils: inducible expression of functional CXCR4 J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2001; 70(1): 113 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |