The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Downing, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Downing, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, T. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 161: 1471-1476.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

IL-10 Regulates Thrombus-Induced Vein Wall Inflammation and Thrombosis1 ,2

L. Joseph Downing*, Robert M. Strieter{dagger}, Amy M. Kadell*, Carol A. Wilke{dagger}, John C. Austin*, Bradley D. Hare*, Marie D. Burdick{dagger}, Lazar J. Greenfield* and Thomas W. Wakefield3,*

* Section of Vascular Surgery and Jobst Vascular Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, and {dagger} Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Vein wall inflammation associated with venous thrombosis is mediated by an imbalance in proinflammatory as compared with antiinflammatory molecules. We hypothesize that IL-10 is an important antiinflammatory cytokine that influences vein wall inflammation and thrombus propagation during venous thrombosis. To test this hypothesis a model of inferior vena caval thrombosis was used. Studies were performed at sacrifice 2 days after thrombus induction and included leukocyte morphometrics, myeloperoxidase activity, vein wall permeability, thrombus weight, and IL-10 ELISA analysis from the vein wall. IL-10 was elevated in the vein wall during venous thrombosis. Neutralization of IL-10 increased inflammation, while supplementation with rIL-10 demonstrated a dose- and time-dependent decrease in inflammation. Interestingly, a low 2.5-µg rIL-10 dose given at time of initiation of thrombosis most significantly decreased inflammation. Thrombus weight was importantly diminished by reconstitution of IL-10. These studies support an important role for IL-10 in the regulation of thrombus-associated inflammation and thrombosis and suggest that IL-10 could be used as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of venous thrombosis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Venous thrombosis is a persistent clinical problem, contributing to significant morbidity and mortality in our society (1, 2). In the United States, clinically recognized venous thrombosis affects nearly 260,000 people each year in patients hospitalized in acute-care facilities (1). Pulmonary embolism remains the most immediate life-threatening sequelae causing death in more than 100,000 patients each year in the United States and contributes to death in another 100,000 (3, 4). In addition, chronic venous insufficiency with resultant skin stasis changes, skin ulceration, and the postphlebitic syndrome also contributes to significant disability and patient morbidity (1).

Work from our laboratory using a rodent model of stasis-induced venous thrombosis has suggested a relationship between venous thrombosis and vein wall inflammation (phlebitis) (5) and confirmed the original observations by Stewart et al. of early neutrophil infiltration in the pathogenesis of venous thrombosis (6). This work demonstrated that the active vein wall proinflammatory response is characterized by predictable cellular trafficking with early neutrophil infiltration followed by monocyte/macrophage extravasation in response to venous thrombosis. The mechanisms regulating the interaction between these two processes has not been fully elucidated. However, vein wall leukocyte emigration has been correlated with the expression of early adhesion molecules such as P-selectin (7) and with various proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, emphasizing the role of directed leukocyte migration and a cytokine cascade in the pathogenesis of the vein wall inflammatory response (8). While venous thrombosis has been associated with an increase in net inflammation, we hypothesize that this may be due to an imbalance that favors proinflammatory, as compared with antiinflammatory, mediators.

IL-10 is a potent antiinflammatory cytokine. In this study, we identify IL-10 as an important endogenous cytokine that regulates inflammation associated with venous thrombosis. A significant production of IL-10 from the vein wall was measured in response to venous thrombosis. Neutralization of IL-10 increased thrombus-associated vein wall inflammation and thrombosis, while exogenous IL-10 supplementation decreased thrombus-associated vein wall inflammation with concomitant reduction in thrombosis. Our findings demonstrate that IL-10 plays an important regulatory role in stasis-induced venous thrombosis and the associated vein wall inflammatory response.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animal model and tissue analysis

Briefly, Sprague Dawley rats, weighing 250 to 300 g were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane (1–2%) and oxygen (100%) anesthesia. Aseptic midline laparotomy was accomplished, and inferior vena caval (IVC)4 thrombosis was performed, as previously described, with IVC ligation just below the level of the renal veins and concomitant ligation of IVC-draining side branches (9, 10, 11). Infrarenal IVC thrombosis is achieved in >95% of animals. Two days after thrombus induction, all animals were sacrificed and the infrarenal IVC below the ligature site were harvested, weighed, and grossly examined for the presence of clot. Thrombus weight was normalized to IVC length. For specimens undergoing vein wall morphometric analysis, a portion of the intact vein wall with thrombus was fixed in 10% formaldehyde for 24 h and then placed into a 70% alcohol solution for subsequent staining with hematoxylin and eosin. In addition, portions of the vein wall only were assayed for IL-10 content and myeloperoxidase (MPO) analysis. All animals used in this study were housed and cared for in the University of Michigan Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine under the direction of a veterinarian according to the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (National Society for Medical Research) and Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Institutes of Health Publication No. 86–23, revised 1985).

Histopathologic analysis and leukocyte morphometric analysis

To assess leukocyte infiltration, standard histologic analysis and morphometrics were performed as previously described (8). After staining the paraffin-embedded slides with hematoxylin and eosin, morphometric analysis was performed under high power light microscopy by counting each section of tissue for specific leukocyte cell types. Each vein wall was assessed for the number and type of cells, beginning at the thrombus-vein wall interface and extending the width of one high power field (HPF, x1000). Five HPF sections of each vein wall were analyzed. Using standard morphologic criteria, including cell size, cytoplasmic content, and nuclear size, cells were classified as neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, or lymphocytes.

Myeloperoxidase assay

The MPO assay was used to detect the presence of neutrophils in the vein wall using a modification of a previously described technique (12, 13, 14, 15). Briefly, after the animals were sacrificed, the IVC vein wall was placed into a 50-mM potassium phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.0) with 5% hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The vein wall was homogenized, sonicated, and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was assayed for MPO activity using a spectrophotometric reaction with o-dianisidine hydrochloride (Sigma) at 490 nm. The results were derived by observing the change in optical density ({Delta}OD) per minute. To improve accuracy, 6 IVC walls were pooled for each MPO determination in the IL-10 neutralization and supplementation studies.

IL-10 ELISA

IL-10 was measured by specific ELISA as previously described (8). Briefly, tissue homogenization of vein wall segments was undertaken in 1x PBS using a hand-held homogenizer. Immunoreactive IL-10 levels were quantitated using a double ligand method. Flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Nunc Immuno-Plate I 96-F, Denmark, Netherlands) were coated with 50 µl/well rabbit anti-IL-10 Ab (1 ng/µl in 0.6 M NaCl, 0.26 M H3BO4, and 0.08N NaOH, pH 9.6) for 16 h at 4°C and then washed with PBS, pH 7.5, 0.05% Tween 20 (wash buffer). Microtiter plate nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 2% BSA in PBS and incubated for 60 min at 37°C. Plates were then rinsed three times with wash buffer, and diluted (1:5, and 1:10) plasma specimen (50 µl) in duplicate was added, followed by incubation for 60 min at 37°C. Plates were then washed three times, followed by the addition of 50 µl/well biotinylated rabbit anti-IL-10 Ab (3.5 µg/ml in PBS, pH 7.5, 0.05% Tween 20, and 2% FCS), and then plates were incubated for 45 min at 37°C. Plates were again washed three times, streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate was added (100 µl/well, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA), and the plates were incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Plates were again washed three times, and the chromogenic substrate o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Bio-Rad Laboratories) 100 µl/well was added. Plates were then incubated at room temperature to the desired extinction, and the reaction was terminated with 50 µl/well 3 M H2SO4 solution. Plates were then read at 490 nm in an ELISA plate reader. Standards were {Omega} log dilutions of IL-10 from 1 pg/ml to 100 ng/ml. The sensitivity of the ELISAs was >= 50 pg/ml.

Statistical evaluation

Mean ± SE and unpaired student’s t test comparing experimental to control groups were used where appropriate. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine whether differences existed within treatment groups, such as the three different IL-10 dosage groups and the three different IL-10 time of administration groups. Individual t tests between dosages and between times were run only if ANOVA values suggested differences between the three groups. Significance was defined at a level of p <= 0.05 or p <= 0.01.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IL-10 is elevated in the vein wall during venous thrombosis

Venous thrombosis was induced, and levels of IL-10 in the vein wall (n = 6) were compared with sham operated controls (n = 6) (laparotomy and dissection of the IVC but no ligature). Animals were sacrificed 2 days after thrombus induction, the wall of the IVC was removed, and IL-10 was measured by ELISA. In the vein walls associated with thrombus, IL-10 was 4550 ± 3750 pg/ml compared with 812 ± 812 pg/ml in the sham control vein walls. This was paralleled by elevated morphometric analysis of leukocytes and MPO assays that were all significantly elevated in thrombosed IVC as compared with sham controls. Concerning leukocytes, thrombosed (n = 10) as compared with sham control (n = 10) values were: neutrophils 55 ± 5 vs 3 ± 1 per 5 HPFs; monocytes 42 ± 2 vs 18 ± 1 per 5 HPFs; lymphocytes 4 ± 1 vs 1 ± 1 per 5 HPFs; total inflammatory cells 101 ± 5 vs 22 ± 1 per 5 HPFs; all p < 0.01 (Fig. 1Go). MPO analysis revealed a 15x increase in activity in the thrombosed veins (n = 10, 239 ± 4 {Delta}OD/min) as opposed to the sham control veins (n = 10, 16 ± 3 {Delta}OD/min), p < 0.01.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Thrombosed vs sham control morphometrics; significant differences between groups.

 
Treatment with anti-IL-10 in vivo leads to augmentation of thrombus-associated inflammation

To determine whether IL-10 was involved in the regulation of net inflammation associated with thrombosis, rats were passively immunized with either anti-IL-10 or normal rabbit serum as control i.v. 1 h before thrombus induction. This treatment resulted in a reduction of endogenous IL-10 from 4,550 pg/ml (n = 6) to 1,733 pg/ml (n = 6). Two days after thrombus induction, anti-IL-10-treated animals (n = 6) revealed a statistically significant increase in vein wall neutrophils (p < 0.01) and total inflammatory cells (p < 0.05), as compared with control Ab-treated (n = 6) animals (Fig. 2Go, A and B). Additionally, anti-IL-10-treated rats (n = 6) exhibited a 36% increase in MPO activity compared with control (n = 6) rats (49 {Delta}OD/min vs 36 {Delta}OD/min).



View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. A, Anti-IL-10 vs control normal rabbit serum (NRS) morphometrics; significant differences between groups. B, Note the increase in neutrophils in the IVC in a rat treated i.v. with Ab to IL-10 (A) compared with a control NRS-treated rat (B). n = neutrophils; w = vein wall; t = thrombus; arrows indicate thrombus/vein wall interface. Hematoxylin and eosin, x1000 (oil).

 
Exogenous administration of IL-10 inhibits inflammation in both a dose- and time-dependent fashion

To evaluate the antiinflammatory potential of IL-10 in venous thrombosis, rats received i.v. recombinant IL-10 (rIL-10; Peprotec, Rocky Hill, NJ) in both a dose- and time-dependent manner. Corresponding controls (n = 18) were given sterile pyrogen-free 0.25% serum albumin (SA) in similar volumes. Recombinant IL-10 was administered at 2.5 µg (n = 12), 10 µg (n = 5), or 40 µg (n = 6) 1 h before thrombus induction (16). Differences between groups were noted by ANOVA for neutrophils and total inflammatory cells (p < 0.01). A statistically significant advantage to giving rIL-10 at the lowest dose (2.5 µg) was found in decreasing vein wall neutrophils and total inflammatory cells, with a significant difference (p <= 0.05) between 2.5 µg and 10 µg, and 2.5 µg and 40 µg for both neutrophils and total inflammatory cells (Fig. 3Go, A and B). The 2.5-µg dose was also significantly different from combined SA controls for neutrophils (33 ± 8 vs 57 ± 6 per 5 HPFs, p < 0.05), total inflammatory cells (60 ± 9 vs 87 ± 6 per 5 HPFs, p < 0.05), and monocytes (22 ± 1 vs 27 ± 2 per 5 HPFs, p < 0.05).



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. A, rIL-10 doses and morphometrics; significant differences between 2.5 µg and 10 µg, 2.5 µg and 40 µg, (neutrophils and total inflammatory cells) and 2.5 µg and control serum albumin (SA) (neutrophils, monocytes, and total inflammatory cells). B, Note the low number of neutrophils in the IVC in a rat treated with rIL-10, 2.5 µg (A) compared with rIL-10, 40 µg (B), both given i.v. 1 h before thrombus induction. n = neutrophils; w = vein wall; t = thrombus; arrows indicate thrombus/vein wall interface. Hematoxylin and eosin, x1000 (oil).

 
In a time-dependent manner, rIL-10 was administered i.v. at 2.5 µg either 6 h prior (n = 6) to thrombus induction (T-6), at the time (n = 6) of thrombus induction (T0), or 6 h after (n = 6) thrombus induction (T+6). Differences between groups were noted by ANOVA for neutrophils and total inflammatory cells (p < 0.01). A statistically significant advantage to giving rIL-10 at a dose of 2.5 µg at the time of thrombus induction (T0) was found compared with 6 h prior (T-6) to thrombus induction or 6 h after (T+6) thrombus induction (Fig. 4Go, A and B). A significant difference between T0 and T-6 was noted for neutrophils (19 ± 1 vs 59 ± 8 per 5 HPFs, p < 0.01) and total inflammatory cells (40 ± 3 vs 87 ± 6 per 5 HPFs, p < 0.01). The T0 time was significantly different from combined SA controls (n = 18) for neutrophils (19 ± 1 vs 64 ± 4 per 5 HPFs, p < 0.01), monocytes (18 ± 2 vs 25 ± 2 per 5 HPFs, p < 0.05), and total inflammatory cells (40 ± 3 vs 92 ± 4 per 5 HPFs, p < 0.01), while the T+6 time point was significantly different from combined SA controls for neutrophils (36 ± 15 vs 64 ± 4 per 5 HPFs, p < 0.05) and total inflammatory cells (69 ± 13 vs 92 ± 4 per 5 HPFs, p < 0.05). Additionally, the T0 time point produced the lowest MPO value (n = 6, 127 ± 7 {Delta}OD/min), with an 8% increase at T+6 (n = 6, 137 ± 9 {Delta}OD/min) and an even greater 14% increase at T-6 (n = 6, 144 ± 15 {Delta}OD/min).



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. A, rIL-10 times of administration and morphometrics; significant differences between T0 and T-6 for neutrophils and total inflammatory cells, T0 and control SA for neutrophils, monocytes and total inflammatory cells, and T+6 and control SA for neutrophils and total inflammatory cells. B, Note the significant decrease in neutrophils in the IVC in a rat treated with rIL-10, 2.5 µg given i.v. at the time of thrombus induction (A) compared with T+6 (B) and T-6 (C). n = neutrophils; w = vein wall; t = thrombus; arrows indicate thrombus/vein wall interface. Hematoxylin and eosin, x1000 (oil).

 
Exogenous administration of IL-10 inhibits thrombosis

Since we have previously identified a correlation between inflammation and venous thrombosis and since IL-10 inhibits inflammation, we next assessed whether IL-10 would inhibit venous thrombosis. Wet thrombus weight (measured at time of sacrifice) was evaluated with rIL-10 administered at the optimal dose and time interval as established above (2.5 µg at T0). Importantly, there was a statistically significant 18% decrease in gross thrombus weight with rIL-10 administration compared with SA control (n = 9, 95 ± 6 mg vs n = 9, 116 ± 7 mg), p = 0.027. Thrombus weight corrected to IVC length demonstrated a similar trend with a 12% decrease (91 ± 4 mg vs 103 ± 5 mg, p = 0.072).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have previously utilized a rat model of stasis-induced venous thrombosis and described the pathophysiology of the vein wall inflammatory response induced during thrombus formation (5, 8), confirming the original observations of neutrophil infiltration by Stewart et al. (6). One of the key features of this response is the presence of neutrophils early after thrombus initiation, followed by monocyte/macrophage vein wall infiltration. Neutrophils, initially found adherent to the endothelium, cause endothelial disruption, exposing the collagen-rich basement membrane and leading to further thrombus propagation. This is followed by leukocyte transendothelial migration, leading to additional vein wall injury.

Although proinflammatory cytokines contribute to modulation of the thrombotic/phlebitis relationship, it seems likely that the initiation, maintenance, and eventual resolution of phlebitis is dependent on a complex balance of proinflammatory and antiinflammatory molecules. Importantly, the regulating role of the antiinflammatory cytokines has not been addressed in venous thrombosis. However, numerous diverse models of inflammation have suggested the importance of the antiinflammatory cytokine IL-10 and its role in down-regulating the inflammatory response (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23).

In the present study, we describe the role of IL-10 in modulating the interrelationship between venous thrombosis and vein wall inflammation. IL-10 was found present in the thrombosed IVC vein wall in response to venous thrombosis and was correlated to other parameters of inflammation. In addition, IL-10 neutralization resulted in heightened vein wall inflammation, whereas exogenous administration of IL-10 was antiinflammatory. Administration of IL-10 at the time of IVC thrombosis induction was the best time point for limiting vessel wall inflammation. Since the half-life of i.v. administered IL-10 has been reported to be between 2.3 and 3.7 h (24), this may explain the lack of significant antiinflammatory effect when given 6 h before thrombus induction. In fact, a dose-response curve in two rats given rIL-10 at 2.5 µg in our laboratory revealed a peak serum level by ELISA 1 h after administration, but no detectable IL-10 at or after 4 h.

IL-10 is a naturally occurring antiinflammatory cytokine critical for influencing the inflammatory and coagulation response. This 35-kDa protein, produced by lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells, and epithelial cells, acts by inhibiting the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines in addition to IL-1, TNF, and IL-6 (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25). In our venous thrombosis model, we have noted by immunohistochemical staining that IL-10 is produced primarily by monocytes and neutrophils in the thrombus and in the vein wall. IL-10 suppresses T cell proliferation (26), macrophage microbial activity (17), and the release of oxygen free radicals and inhibits nitric oxide-dependent microbicidal activity of leukocytes (27). IL-10 inhibits cytokine production from stimulated eosinophils (28), stimulated monocytes (29), and stimulated neutrophils (26, 30), while decreasing chemokine mRNA half-life (31) and up-regulating IL-1 receptor antagonist from stimulated neurophils (32). In an ex vivo system of LPS-challenged human blood, IL-10 elevations were noted within the first 6 h of LPS administration, and the addition of neutralizing Abs to IL-10 increased the levels of leukocyte-derived cytokines. Furthermore, patients with septicemia demonstrate a significant elevation in IL-10 (33). Additionally, IL-10 has in vitro effects on endothelial cells. IL-10 has been found to inhibit the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 from stimulated HUVEC (34) and to inhibit the adhesion of leukocytes to stimulated HUVEC by down-regulating the expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 (35). In other studies, in a paradoxical fashion, IL-10 has been found to induce the expression of E-selectin on HUVEC and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (36) and to enhance VCAM-1 expression (but not ICAM-1, E-selectin, or major histocompatibility Ags) on HUVEC in the presence of PHA-activated peripheral blood monocytes (37).

We found that the inhibition of inflammation and IL-10 administration were best at a low dose (2.5 µg) when given at the time of thrombus induction. Recent studies in mice confirm that exogenous IL-10 at low dose (1 µg) confers resistance to what is normally a lethal dose of LPS (38). This protective effect occurred when IL-10 was given simultaneously or 30 min after LPS challenge. In a mouse model of staphylococcal enterotoxin, IL-10 was protective when given either before or simultaneously (39, 40). Additionally, mice pretreated 2 h before 25 min of supraceliac aortic occlusion with either 0.2 µg, 2 µg, 5 µg, or 20 µg rhIL-10 were found to be protected against adverse neutrophil-mediated lung injury at the lower doses, while essentially no protection was noted at the highest dose of 20 µg (16). This is similar to the results in which the highest dose (40 µg) was not protective against inflammation and in fact potentiated the inflammatory response, suggesting an in vivo desensitization of IL-10 responses at high levels of IL-10. Alternatively, at higher doses of IL-10, the paradoxical proinflammatory aspects of IL-10 may predominate.

In the context of coagulation regulation, IL-10 has been found to inhibit the production of tissue factor on the surface of monocytes (41, 42, 43), down-regulate the expression of mRNA for fibrinogen (44), and, in human endotoxemia, modulate the fibrinolytic system and inhibit coagulant responses including the generation of prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 and thrombin-antithrombin complexes on volunteer exposure to LPS (45). These findings suggest a role for IL-10 in the regulation of thrombus generation. It is unclear whether these properties of IL-10 are a direct effect of this cytokine’s ability to induce proteins that inhibit tissue factor or procoagulant activity or are due to indirect effects of IL-10 inhibition of cytokine production. Tissue factor expression on the surfaces of monocytes in response to adhesion molecule expression contributes to thrombus formation and propagation (46). In addition, thrombin formation after a stimulating event, such as venous thrombosis with venous stasis, endothelial hypoxia, and vein wall injury, leads to the up-regulation of early adhesion molecules (such as P-selectin) that contribute to the amplification of vein wall inflammation and thrombus propagation (47). In this investigation, utilizing an assessment of thrombus load, i.e., thrombus weight, importantly we have shown that IL-10 plays a role in thrombus formation as related to vein wall inflammation. Animals treated with rIL-10 at the 2.5-µg dose given at the time of thrombus induction revealed a statistically significant decrease in thrombus weight.

Our findings demonstrate the importance of the antiinflammatory cytokine IL-10 in regulating the interaction between stasis-induced venous thrombosis and the associated vein wall inflammatory response. IL-10 is present in high quantity in the vein wall in response to venous thrombosis. IL-10 depletion by neutralization resulted in increased vein wall leukocyte infiltration (especially neutrophils) confirmed by MPO analysis. Exogenous IL-10 supplementation produced a decrease in inflammation at a dose of 2.5 µg when given at the time of thrombus induction. IL-10 administration 6 h before initial thrombus formation even at the proper dose appeared to produce a paradoxic increase in leukocyte infiltration confirmed by MPO analysis; likewise, its administration at doses of 10 µg and 40 µg given 1 h before thrombus induction increased leukocyte infiltration. These results stress the importance of appropriate dosing and timing when administering IL-10 to achieve its desired antiinflammatory effects. Importantly, IL-10 administration also decreased thrombus weight. The present results suggest that further studies on the ability of rIL-10 to limit inflammation and thrombus formation during venous thrombosis are warranted.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL53355 (to T.W.W.), and by National Institutes of Health P5O Grant HL56402 (to R.M.S.). Back

2 A portion of this data was presented in poster form at the 45th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery and the 54th Annual Meeting of the Society for Vascular Surgery, June 1–4, 1997, Boston, MA. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas W. Wakefield, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Room 2210 THCC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail address: Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: IVC, inferior vena cava; SA, serum albumin; MPO, myeloperoxidase; T-6, 6 h before thrombus induction; HPF, high power field; T0, at the time of thrombus induction; {Delta}OD, change in optical density; T+6, 6 h after thrombus induction. Back

Received for publication January 23, 1998. Accepted for publication March 27, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Clagett, G. P., F. A. Anderson, J. Heit, M. N. Levine, H. B. Wheeler. 1995. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 108:(Suppl.):312s.
  2. Greenfield, L. J.. 1993. Venous thromboembolic disease. W.S. Moore, ed. Vascular Surgery: A Comprehensive Review 770. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.
  3. Dalen, J. E., J. S. Alpert. 1975. Natural history of pulmonary embolism. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 17:257.
  4. Alpert, J. S., J. E. Dalen. 1994. Epidemiology and natural history of venous thromboembolism. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 36:417.[Medline]
  5. Downing, L. J., R. M. Strieter, A. M. Kadell, C. A. Wilke, S. L. Brown, S. K. Wrobleski, M. D. Burdick, M. S. Hulin, J. B. Fowlkes, L. J. Greenfield, T. W. Wakefield. 1996. Neutrophils are the initial cell type identified in deep venous thrombosis induced vein wall inflammation. ASAIO J. 42:M677.[Medline]
  6. Stewart, G. J., W. G. Ritchie, P. R. Lynch. 1974. Venous endothelial damage produced by massive sticking and emigration of leukocytes. Am. J. Pathol. 74:507.[Medline]
  7. Downing, L. J., T. W. Wakefield, R. M. Strieter, M. R. Prince, F. J. Londy, J. B. Fowlkes, M. S. Hulin, A. M. Kadell, C. A. Wilke, S. L. Brown, S. K. Wrobleski, M. D. Burdick, D. C. Anderson, L. J. Greenfield. 1997. Anti-P-selectin antibody decreases inflammation and thrombus formation in venous thrombosis. J. Vasc. Surg. 25:816.[Medline]
  8. Wakefield, T. W., R. M. Strieter, C. A. Wilke, A. M. Kadell, S. K. Wrobleski, M. D. Burdick, R. Schmidt, S. L. Kunkel, L. J. Greenfield. 1995. Venous thrombosis-associated inflammation and attenuation with neutralizing antibodies to cytokines and adhesion molecules. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15:258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Reyers, I., L. Mussoni, M. B. Donati, G. de Gaetano. 1980. Failure of aspirin at different doses to modify experimental thrombosis in rats. Thromb. Res. 18:669.[Medline]
  10. Millet, J., J. Theveniaux, M. Pascal. 1987. A new experimental model of venous thrombosis in rats involving partial stasis and slight endothelial alterations. Thromb. Res. 45:123.[Medline]
  11. Monreal, M., P. Silveira, L. Monreal, J. Monasterio, A. M. Angles, E. Lafoz, L. Lorente. 1991. Comparative study on the anti-thrombotic efficacy of four low-molecular weight heparins in three different models of experimental venous thrombosis. Haemostasis 21:91.[Medline]
  12. Barone, F. C., L. M. Hillegass, W. J. Price, R. F. White, E. V. Lee, G. Z. Feuerstein, H. M. Sarau, R. K. Clark, D. E. Griswold. 1991. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration into cerebral focal ischemic tissue: myeloperoxidase activity assay and histologic verification. J. Neurosci. Res. 29:336.[Medline]
  13. Krawisz, J. E., P. Sharon, W. F. Stenson. 1984. Quantitative assay for acute intestinal inflammation based on myeloperoxidase activity: assessment of inflammation in rat and hamster models. Gastroenterology 87:1344.[Medline]
  14. Cramer, R., M. R. Soranzo, P. Dri, R. Menegazzi, A. Pitotti, G. Zabucchi, P. Patriarca. 1984. A simple reliable assay for myeloperoxidase activity in mixed neutrophil-eosinophil cell suspensions: application to detection of myeloperoxidase deficiency. J. Immunol. Methods 70:119.[Medline]
  15. Dahlgren, C., P. Follin, H. Lundqvist, C. Sjolin. 1993. Quantitative slot-blot chemoluminescence assay for determination of myeloperoxidase from human granulocytes. Annal. Biochem. 214:284.[Medline]
  16. Hess, P. J., J. M. Seeger, T. S. Huber, M. B. Welborn, T. D. Martin, T. R. Harward, S. Duschek, P. D. Edwards, C. C. Solorzano, E. M. Copeland, L. L. Moldawer. 1997. Exogenously administered interleukin-10 decreases pulmonary neutrophil infiltration in a TNF-dependent murine model of acute visceral ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 26:113.[Medline]
  17. Greenberger, M. J., R. M. Strieter, S. L. Kunkel, J. M. Danforth, R. E. Goodman, T. J. Standiford. 1995. Neutralization of IL-10 increases survival in a murine model of Klebsiella pneumonia. J. Immunol. 155:722.[Abstract]
  18. Standiford, T. J., R. M. Strieter, N. W. Lukacs, S. L. Kunkel. 1995. Neutralization of IL-10 increases lethality in endotoxemia: cooperative effects of macrophage inflammatory protein-2 and TNF. J. Immunol. 155:2222.[Abstract]
  19. Kusske, A. M., A. J. Rongione, S. W. Ashly, D. W. McFadden, H. A. Reber. 1996. Interluekin-10 prevents death in lethal necrotizing pancreatitis in mice. Surgery 120:284.[Medline]
  20. Montz, F. J., C. H. Holschneider, M. Bozuk, W. H. Gotlieb, O. Martinez-Maza. 1994. Interleukin 10: ability to minimize postoperative intraperitoneal adhesion formation in a murine model. Fertil. Steril. 61:1136.[Medline]
  21. Rosenbaum, J. T., E. Angell. 1995. Paradoxical effects of IL-10 in endotoxin-induced uveitis. J. Immunol. 155:4090.[Abstract]
  22. Ralph, P., I. Nakoinz, A. Sampson-Johannes, S. Fong, D. Lowe, H. Y. Min, L. Lin. 1992. IL-10, T lymphocyte inhibitor of human blood cell production of IL-1 and TNF. J. Immunol. 148:808.[Abstract]
  23. Fiorentino, D. F., A. Zlotnik, T. R. Mosmann, M. Howard, A. O’Garra. 1991. IL-10 inhibits cytokine production by activated macrophages. J. Immunol. 147:3815.[Abstract]
  24. Huhn, R. D., S. Radwanski, S. M. O’Connell, M. G. Sturgill, L. Clarke, R. P. Cody, M. B. Affrime, D. L. Cutler. 1996. Pharmacokinetics and immunomodulatory properties of intravenously administered recombinant human interleukin-10 in healthy volunteers. Blood 87:699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Colletti, L. M., S. L. Kunkel, A. Waltz, M. D. Burdick, R. G. Kunkel, C. A. Wilke, R. M. Strieter. 1995. Chemokine expression during hepatic ischemia/reperfusion-induced lung injury in the rat. J. Clin. Invest. 95:134.
  26. Howard, M., A. O’Garra. 1992. Biological properties of interleukin 10. Immunol. Today 13:198.[Medline]
  27. Goldman, M., A. Marchant, L. Schandene. 1996. Endogenous interleukin-10 in inflammatory disorders: regulatory roles and pharmacological modulation. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 796:282.[Medline]
  28. Takanaski, S., R. Nonaka, Z. Xing, P. O’Bryne, J. Dolovich, M. Jordana. 1994. Interleukin 10 inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced survival and cytokine production by human peripheral blood eosinophils. J. Exp. Med. 180:711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. de Waal Malefyt, R., J. Abrahms, B. Bennet, C. G. Figdor, J. E. deVries. 1991. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) inhibits cytokine synthesis by human monocytes: an autoregulatory role of IL-10 produced by monocytes. J. Exp. Med. 174:1209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Cassatella, M. A., L. Meda, S. Bonora, M. Ceska, G. Constantin. 1993. Interleukin 10 (IL-10) inhibits the release of proinflammatory cytokines from human polymorphonuclear leukocytes: evidence for an autocrine role of TNF and IL-1ß in mediating the production of IL-8 triggered by lipopolysaccharide. J. Exp. Med. 178:2207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kasama, T., R. M. Strieter, N. W. Lukacs, M. D. Burdick, S. L. Kunkel. 1994. Regulation of neutrophil-derived chemokine expression by IL-10. J. Immunol. 152:3559.[Abstract]
  32. Cassatella, M. A., L. Meda, S. Gasperini, F. Calzetti, S. Bonora. 1994. Interleukin 10 (IL-10) up-regulates IL-1 receptor antagonist production from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human polymorphonuclear leukocytes by delaying mRNA degradation. J. Exp. Med. 179:1695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Marchant, A., J. Deviere, B. Byl, D. De Groote, J. L. Vincent, M. Goldman. 1994. IL-10 production during septicemia. Lancet 343:707.[Medline]
  34. Chen, C. C., A. M. Manning. 1996. TGF-ß1, IL-10 and IL-4 differentially modulate the cytokine-induced expression of IL-6 and IL-8 in human endothelial cells. Cytokine 8:58.[Medline]
  35. Krakauer, T.. 1995. IL-10 inhibits the adhesion of leukocytic cells to IL-1-activated human endothelial cells. Immunol. Lett. 45:61.[Medline]
  36. Vora, M., L. I. Romero, M. A. Karasek. 1996. Interleukin-10 induces E-selectin on small and large blood vessel endothelial cells. J. Exp. Med. 184:821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Fiehn, C., E. M. Paleolog, M. Feldmann. 1997. Selective enhancement of endothelial cell VCAM-1 expression by interleukin-10 in the presence of activated leukocytes. Immunology 91:565.[Medline]
  38. Howard, M., T. Muchamuel, S. Andrade, S. Menon. 1993. IL-10 protects mice from lethal endotoxemia. J. Exp. Med. 177:1205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Gerard, C., C. Bruyns, A. Marchant, D. Abramowicz, P. Vandenabeele, A. Delvaux, W. Fiers, M. Goldman, T. Velu. 1993. Interleukin-10 reduces the release of TNF and prevents lethality in experimental endotoxemia. J. Exp. Med. 177:547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Bean, A. G., R. A. Freiberg, S. Andrade, S. Menon, A. Zlotnik. 1993. IL-10 protects mice against staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced lethal shock. Infect. Immun. 61:4937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Ramani, M., V. Ollivier, F. Khechai, T. Vu, C. Ternisien, F. Bridey, D. deProst. 1993. Interleukin-10 inhibits endotoxin-induced tissue factor mRNA production by human monocytes. FEBS Lett. 334:114.[Medline]
  42. Jungi, T. W., M. Brcic, S. Eperon, S. Albrecht. 1994. Transforming growth factor-ß and interleukin-10, but not interleukin-4, down-regulate procoagulant activity and tissue factor expression in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Thromb. Res. 76:463.[Medline]
  43. Pradier, O., C. Gerald, A. Delvaux, M. Lybin, D. Abramowicz, P. Capel, T. Velu, M. Goldman. 1993. Interleukin-10 inhibits the induction of monocyte procoagulant activity by bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:2700.[Medline]
  44. Vasse, M., J. Paysant, J. Soria, S. S. Mirshahi, J. P. Vannier, C. Soria. 1996. Down-regulation of fibrinogen biosynthesis by IL-4, IL-10 and IL-13. Br. J. Haematol. 93:955.[Medline]
  45. Pajkrt, D., T. van der Poll, M. Levi, D. L. Cutler, M. B. Affrime, A. van den Ende, J. W. ten Cate, S. J. van Deventer. 1997. Interleukin-10 inhibits activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis during human endotoxemia. Blood 89:2701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Edwards, R.L., F. R. Rickles. 1992. The role of leukocytes in the activation of blood coagulation. Sem. Hematol. 29:202.[Medline]
  47. Celi, A., G. Pellegrini, R. Lorenzet, A. De Blasi, N. Ready, B. C. Furie, B. Furie. 1994. P-selectin induces the expression of tissue factor on monocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:8767.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc GenetHome page
R. Y.L. Zee, R. J. Glynn, S. Cheng, L. Steiner, L. Rose, and P. M Ridker
An Evaluation of Candidate Genes of Inflammation and Thrombosis in Relation to the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism: The Women's Genome Health Study
Circ Cardiovasc Genet, February 1, 2009; 2(1): 57 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
M. J. Tracz, J. P. Juncos, J. P. Grande, A. J. Croatt, A. W. Ackerman, Z. S. Katusic, and K. A. Nath
Induction of Heme Oxygenase-1 is a Beneficial Response in a Murine Model of Venous Thrombosis
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2008; 173(6): 1882 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. Nishihira, T. Imamura, A. Yamashita, K. Hatakeyama, Y. Shibata, Y. Nagatomo, H. Date, T. Kita, T. Eto, and Y. Asada
Increased expression of interleukin-10 in unstable plaque obtained by directional coronary atherectomy
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2006; 27(14): 1685 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
P. K. Henke, A. Varga, S. De, C. B. Deatrick, J. Eliason, D. A. Arenberg, P. Sukheepod, P. Thanaporn, S. L. Kunkel, G. R. Upchurch Jr, et al.
Deep Vein Thrombosis Resolution Is Modulated by Monocyte CXCR2-Mediated Activity in a Mouse Model
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2004; 24(6): 1130 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. Tedgui and Z. Mallat
Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms in the Vascular Wall
Circ. Res., May 11, 2001; 88(9): 877 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. K. Henke, L. A. DeBrunye, R. M. Strieter, J. S. Bromberg, M. Prince, A. M. Kadell, M. Sarkar, F. Londy, and T. W. Wakefield
Viral IL-10 Gene Transfer Decreases Inflammation and Cell Adhesion Molecule Expression in a Rat Model of Venous Thrombosis
J. Immunol., February 15, 2000; 164(4): 2131 - 2141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Downing, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Downing, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, T. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS