|
|
||||||||






*
HLA Laboratory, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center,
Surgery Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, and
Biological Resources Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
90% of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) originated
from HLA-A*0201 patients recognize the MART-12735
(AAGIGILTV) sequence (2), suggesting its usefulness for the development
of immunotherapeutic strategies. Since HLA-A*0201 is the predominant
allele in the North American Caucasian population, which is most
frequently affected by this disease (3, 4), peptide-based vaccinations
restricted to HLA-A2 patients were initiated by administering the
MART-12735 peptide with the purpose of enhancing T cell
reactivity against melanoma in vivo.
Peptide-based vaccinations have several potential advantages:
simplicity and low cost of administration, minimal toxicity, and
evidence of in vivo effectiveness in eliciting T cell activation (5).
We recently monitored T cell activation in the PBMC of patients
undergoing the first anti-melanoma, peptide-based vaccination
trial. This trial was based on the s.c. administration of the
MART-12735 peptide in conjunction with IFA. A more
than threefold increase in IFN-
release by
MART-12735-specific CTL was noted in 15 of 18 patients
treated with this regimen (6). Similar results were reproduced in a
cohort of patients undergoing gp100/Pmel 17 epitope-based vaccination
(7). Our unpublished observations (available upon request) have shown
that the powerful activation of T cell reactivity observed after
peptide administration could not be achieved by other modalities of
vaccination, based on the in vivo induction of expression, processing,
and presentation of whole MAA (MART-1/Melan A or gp100/Pmel 17) using
recombinant technology.
One disadvantage of epitope-based vaccination is the exclusiveness of the relationship between peptide and HLA alleles. Because of the intrinsic limitations posed by HLA polymorphism (8, 9, 10, 11), a vaccination strategy based on endogenous processing and presentation of whole T cell Ag (containing the maximum epitopic potential) could broaden the application of MAA vaccines. An ideal vaccine might be engineered that could be offered regardless of the patients HLA phenotype and without identification of immunogenic epitopes. Therefore, the concept of whole Ag vaccination has gained significant popularity recently as an alternative to peptide-based vaccination. To be successful, this strategy requires that individual molecules function with efficiency comparable to T cell Ags in association with various HLA alleles. Few lines of evidence, however, show that MAA can comparably induce T cell reactivity in association with different HLA class I restriction elements. For example, there is no evidence that MART-1/Melan A can be recognized in association with HLA alleles other than A*0201. For larger MAA recognized by HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL, epitopic determinants associated with other HLA-A class I alleles have been identified, such as HLA-A3 for gp100/pMel 17 (12), HLA-A24 and -B44 for tyrosinase (13, 14), and HLA-A1 for MAGE-3 (15). However, responses to these epitopes are generally observed less frequently. For example, tyrosinase, which is predominantly recognized by HLA-A24-restricted TIL (13), is probably not a dominant immunogen in association with HLA-A*0201, as none of 10 HLA-A*0201-restricted TIL cultures analyzed recognized this MAA (16).
Although we are aware that the ease with which a MAA can elicit T cell reactivity in vitro may not directly correlate with clinical significance (17), we hypothesized, for the purpose of this study, that differences in induction of T cell reactivity under comparable conditions of stimulation could, in principle, be suggestive of different immunogenic potential. In this study, therefore, we compared the ability of MART-1/Melan A to elicit non-HLA-A*0201-restricted T cell-specific CTL responses using an autologous Ag presentation system consisting of dendritic cells (DC) infected with recombinant vaccinia virus (rVV) encoding for MART-1/Melan A followed by a second stimulation with DC infected with recombinant fowl pox virus (rFP) encoding for MART-1/Melan A (18). When stimulated under conditions in which HLA-A*0201-restricted anti-melanoma reactivity could be frequently observed, no reactivity was detected in association with other HLA-A class I alleles no matter how structurally similar these alleles are to HLA-A*0201.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Iscoves medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) with 10% heat-inactivated human AB serum, 10 mM HEPES buffer, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin, 0.5 mg/ml amphotericin B, 0.03% glutamine was used for all experiments.
Peptide synthesis: MART-1, G9-209-2 M, and Flu M1 peptides
A panel of 110 overlapping nonamer peptides
(MART-119 through MART-1110118)
encompassing the MART-1/Melan A sequence (118 amino acids) was
synthesized by a solid phase method using a multiple peptide
synthesizer and purified by HPLC, as previously described (2). Several
size-variant analogues of MART-12735 encompassing this
nonamer-flanking sequences (AEEAAGIGILTVILV) were also
synthesized. Each peptide was HPLC purified, and the presence of
truncated peptides was excluded by mass spectrometry. gp100209
(ITDQVPFSV) and gp100-209-2 M peptides
(IMDQVPFSV) were produced by Chiron Mimotopes Peptide
Systems (San Diego, CA). The G9-209-2 M peptide is a nine-amino acid
sequence modified at position 2 (T
M) from the natural gp100209
epitope (16). This modification enhances binding to HLA-A*0201 and
induction of T cell reactivity (19). Flu-M15866
(GILGFVFTL) from the influenza matrix protein was synthesized by
Multiple Peptide Systems (San Diego, CA). All peptides were used at a
final concentration of 1 µM (unless otherwise stated) from aliquots
dissolved in 100% DMSO (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) and stored at
-70°C.
T2, EBV-B, melanoma, and TIL cultures
T2 cells were used as targets in cytokine release assays for HLA-A*0201-restricted epitopes. This cell line expresses HLA-A*0201 and is defective in endogenous processing, which enhances the effectiveness of exogenous peptide loading (20, 21). B lymphoblastoid cells derived from peripheral blood were transformed with exogenous EBV (22) or were obtained from the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures (23). In particular, the following EBV-B cell lines were used: LCL.721 (HLA-A*0201), RML (HLA-A*0204), AM (HLA-A*0205), and CLA (HLA-A*0206). Other EBV-B cell lines were developed from patients, and typing of relevant HLA class I alleles was done by sequencing.
HLA-matched tumor targets. To assess recognition of naturally processed and presented MAA, cell lines generated from patients at the National Cancer Institute and possessing different HLA types were fully characterized for HLA class I, MART-1/Melan A, and gp100/Pmel 17 expression. Furthermore, the following cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA): the breast cancer cell line MDA-231 (ATCC HTB 26), SK23-MEL (ATCC HTB 71), and A375-MEL (ATCC CRL 1619). The tumor lines were maintained in monolayer culture in CM (24).
TIL cultures. TIL 1235 and TIL 1520 were generated from metastases of HLA-A*0201 melanoma patients. These cultures were >99% CD8+. The CD8+ T cell clone A42 was established from a TIL culture (1, 2). Both TIL 1235 and clone A42 recognize MART-12735 (25). TIL 1520 recognizes the gp100209 sequence of gp100/pMel 17. All TIL recognize HLA-A*0201/MAA-expressing tumors. TIL were propagated in CM plus 6000 IU/ml of IL-2 (Chiron Corporation, Emeryville, CA).
HLA typing
HLA class I typing and HLA-A*02 subtyping was done by sequence-specific primer PCR of genomic DNA (4) isolated from PBL or, when relevant, from EBV-B and tumor lines (26). When indicated, HLA alleles were typed by direct sequencing of PCR products amplified from genomic (27) or complementary DNA (28). The name A*0226 has been officially assigned by the World Health Organization Nomenclature Committee (29); the GenBank accession number is AF008933.
Development of DC and in vitro sensitization of CD8+ T cells
Preparation of CD8+ T cells and DC. Leukaphereses were performed in patients with metastatic melanoma referred for treatment to the Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute. All PBL collections were done before enrollment of patients into a MAA-specific vaccination protocol, and therefore CTL reactivity reflected the natural predisposition to react against MAA. PBMC were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient and used for preparation of DC and T cells. CD8+ enrichment was achieved by positive selection on biomagnetic beads (Dynal Corporation, Great Neck, NY). In all experiments, the T cell population was >95% CD8+ (anti-CD8 mAb, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). After Ficoll-Hypaque separation, 1 to 3 x 108 PBMC were processed for preparation of DC by culture in 75-cm2 flasks for 2 to 3 h at 37°C as previously described (18, 30). The nonadherent cells were removed, and the adherent cells were cultured for 5 to 7 days in 10 ml of CM supplemented with human recombinant granulocyte/macrophage-CSF (hrGM-CSF, 2000 IU/ml; PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) and human rIL-4 (hrIL-4, 2000 IU/ml; PeproTech) (18).
Infection of DC with pox viruses. To induce endogenous expression of Ag, DC were infected with rVV or rFP encoding for MART-1/Melan A (rVV-MART-1, rFP-MART-1), gp100 (rVV-gp100, rFP-gp100), or Flu (rVV-Flu) (18, 31). DC (1 x 106) were incubated in a minimal volume of CM at 37°C with rVV (1 x 107 plaque-forming units/ml) for 1 h. The DC were then washed twice, and one aliquot was used to quantify the amount of virally driven expression of MAA (M2-7C10, MART-1/Melan A-specific (32), and HMB45, gp100/Pmel 17-specific mAb; Biogenex Laboratories, San Ramon, CA) by intracellular FACS as previously described (33). DC preparations showing a >50% rate of expression of the relevant MAA were used for in vitro sensitization.
In vitro sensitization of PBL. Cells (45 x 106/well CD8+ lymphocytes) were coincubated with 1 x 106 rVV-infected DC in 24-well plates. CD8+ T cell cultures were restimulated after 1 wk with rFP-infected DC. rFP vectors were used for the restimulation because they are not immunologically cross-reactive with rVV and therefore are least likely to enhance a virally (rVV)-driven CTL expansion. IL-2 (300 IU/ml) was added 24 h after stimulation and every 2 to 3 days thereafter. Effector cells were tested 7 to 10 days after restimulation.
Peptide pulsing of DC. In some instances, in vitro sensitization was carried with DC presenting exogenously provided peptides. Recovered DC were pulsed for 2 h at 37°C (1 x 106 cells/ml and 1 µg/ml peptide).
Development of T cell clones. Bulk CTL cultures were cloned by limiting dilution according to Riddells technique (34, 35). Cultures were plated in 96-well plates at 1 or 10 cells/well and maintained in the presence of OKT3 (30 ng/ml), 50,000/well irradiated allogeneic PBMC (3,000 rads), and 10,000/well irradiated EBV-B cells (10,000 rads). IL-2 (120 IU/ml) was added every other day. Clones were selected according to their reactivity against HLA-matched, MAA-expressing tumor targets.
Assessment of CTL reactivity.
T cells (105) were coincubated with 105
stimulator cells for 24 h at 37°C in 200 µl of CM. IL-2, IL-4,
IL-12, IFN-
, GM-CSF, and TNF-
in the supernatants was measured by
Quantikine ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Data are
presented as picograms per milliliter. Cytokine release was significant
when threefold higher in test than in control conditions and above 100
pg/ml.
Reconstitution assay and determination of ß2-microglobulin (ß2m) dissociation rates
Peptide binding was analyzed by HLA class I heavy chain reconstitution assay and quantified by ß2m dissociation rates (36). Heterotrimers containing 125I-labeled ß2m, soluble HLA class I heavy chains, and peptides of interest were purified by gel filtration, and aliquots were analyzed at various time points to determine of the rate of ß2m dissociation by injection over a second gel filtration column. All peptides were assessed at a 10-µM concentration. Reconstitution values are given as the percentage of 125I-ß2m in the heterotrimer fraction over the total 125I-ß2m: (125I-ß2m-HLA/125I-ß2m-HLA + 125I-ß2m) x 100. Dissociation rates represent time required for 50% reduction in heterotrimers/125I-ß2m radioactivity.
Vß-specific analysis of T cell clonality
T cell clonality was analyzed by Vß-specific PCR amplification. Direct heteroduplex analysis and sequencing were used to screen and characterize T cell clones belonging to the same Vß family (37). Vß-specific primer sequences were selected based on the complete DNA sequence of the human ß-TCR locus (38).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An autologous system of rVV- or rFP-driven expression, processing,
and presentation of endogenous Ag was engineered. This system
theoretically allows equal opportunity of CTL induction in association
with various HLA/epitope combinations. MART-1/Melan A protein
expression was induced in DC by infection with rVV-MART-1 (primary in
vitro stimulation) followed, a week later, by infection with rFP-MART-1
(secondary in vitro stimulation). Preliminary data had shown that this
binary system of stimulation was highly successful in inducing
MART-1/Melan A-specific, HLA-A*0201-restricted T cells in melanoma
patients not previously exposed to immunologic manipulation (18). We
also addressed the effect of viral Ag expression as a possible source
of misleading culture results. Surprisingly, no pox virus-specific
reactivity was observed in the absence of recent in vivo exposure to
rVV. This finding was independent of an individuals previous juvenile
exposure to small pox vaccine. In contrast, CD8+ cells
induced from patients recently exposed to either rVV-MART-1 or
rVV-gp100 for vaccination purposes demonstrated strong anti-viral
reactivity, which concealed the MAA-specific T cell response (Table I
). Neither humoral nor cellular
cross-reactivity was observed between rVV and rFP (data not shown).
Thus, the expression of viral molecules did not interfere with the
assay results in the naive population analyzed in this study.
|
We attempted to induce MART-1/Melan A-specific CTL from PBMC
obtained from 17 individuals carrying the HLA-A*0201 phenotype and not
previously exposed to MAA-specific vaccination. We observed
HLA-A*0201-restricted MART-1 reactivity in 15 of the 17 patients
(88%). In all cases, MART-1 reactivity was directed against the
immunodominant epitope MART-12735 (Tables
II and
III). Among the 15 MART-1-reactive
cultures, 13 could also recognize HLA-A*0201-matched tumors (76%). The
two CTL cultures unresponsive to MART-12735 could not
recognize HLA-matched tumors. In only one case was
non-HLA-A*0201-restricted recognition of tumor noted (patient 5,
Tables II, IV, and
V). Thus, in paired conditions of
stimulation, HLA-A alleles different from HLA-A*0201 failed to present
MART-1/Melan A to autologous CTL with an efficiency comparable to
HLA-A*0201 (Fishers exact test, p < 0.001). Possible
recognition of MAA associated with HLA-B and -C locus alleles was also
tested when autologous EBV-B lines were available (6 patients). The
EBV-B lines were infected with rVV-expressing relevant (rVV-MART-1) or
irrelevant (rVV-gp100) Ag and tested for recognition. In this fashion,
a panel of other common HLA-B (including HLA-B7, B8 B44 and B57) and
HLA-C alleles could be tested. In no case was specific recognition
of rVV-MART-1-infected autologous EBV-B lines noted. The
dominant effect of the HLA-A*0201/MART-12735
combination on CTL expansion and activation could have concealed
cryptic CTL responses. We therefore analyzed PBL from 12 additional
melanoma patients not expressing HLA-A*0201 (Table II
). In no case was
antitumor reactivity recognized independently from the level of
structural divergence from HLA-A*0201 of the HLA allele analyzed. An
extreme was represented by patient 21 in which a new HLA-A*02 allele
was identified as HLA-A*0226. This allele is characterized by a point
mutation (T
A) with respect to HLA-A*0201, at nucleotide
527, which corresponds to a substitution at position 152 from a
hydrophobic valine to a hydrophilic glutamic acid.
|
Tumor lines may be unpredictable in MAA expression, processing, or
presentation. Therefore, CTL cultures generated either from
HLA-A*0201-expressing or -nonexpressing individuals were screened by
incubation with HLA-A matched EBV-B cell lines separately pulsed with
each of 110 overlapping MART-1 nonamer peptides (1 µM). Six strongly
MART-12735-reactive, HLA-A*0201-restricted (patients
1, 2, 4, 5, 9, and 14), four MART-12735-nonreactive
or poorly reactive HLA-A*0201-restricted (patients 3, 6, 7, 12), and
six non-HLA-A*0201 cultures (patient 19, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27) were
tested. Although reactivity could be consistently detected by pulsing
HLA-A*0201-expressing targets with MART-12735 in
MART-1-reactive cultures from HLA-A*0201 patients, no reactivity toward
other HLA-A allele/peptide combination was noted (Table III
). Thus,
these experiments failed to induce demonstrable anti-MART-1/Melan A
specificity associated with HLA alleles different from HLA-A*0201,
underscoring the high stringency of the MART-1/HLA-A*0201 combination.
It is, however, important to note that for Ags different from
MART-1/Melan A, exceptions to the epitope/allele stringency
demonstrated by MART-1 were noted as already reported by others (39).
For example, in patient 15 (HLA-A*0201, A*0205) stimulation of
CD8+ cultures with DC infected with rVV-Flu induced Flu
M15866 reactivity in the context of HLA-A*0201 and
A*0205.
|
In patients bearing the HLA-A*0201 phenotype, a weak, subdominant
non-HLA-A*0201-restricted MART-1 reactivity could have been concealed
by nonspecific proliferation of CTL in the presence of IL-2 or by
predominant expansion of HLA-A*0201-restricted MART-1-specific CTL.
This possibility was tested by clonal analysis of early bulk CTL
cultures. In three patients who showed good HLA-A*0201-restricted
recognition of melanoma, CTL clones were developed by limiting
dilution. All three patient cultures efficiently recognized
MART-12735 in the context of HLA-A*0201- and
HLA-A*0201-expressing tumors (Table IV
). In addition, the CTL of
patient 5 (HLA-A*0201, -*01) suggested the recognition of
HLA-A*01-matched targets. Cloning was performed at limiting dilution of
100, 10, and 1 cell/well. Because of the good yield of reactive clones
at the higher dilution, the 100 cell/well cultures were not analyzed
(Table V
).
|
|
release upon incubation of
the clones with SK23-MEL (HLA-A*01, 0201/MART-1/Melan A positive) or
with 888-MEL (HLA-A*01, *24/MART-1/Melan A positive). Several
HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL clones were identified in all patients.
However, only in patient 5 could we identify non-HLA-A*0201-restricted
tumor recognition by one of 40 melanoma- specific clones studied (Table VI
release.
It is possible that this CTL recognizes a non-nonamer or a
posttranslationally modified epitope. In addition to this exception,
clonal analysis of three CTL cultures failed to unveil subdominant
MART-1 specificities associated with HLA-A alleles other than
HLA-A*0201.
|
The high prevalence of HLA-A*0201-restricted anti MART-1
reactivity noted in melanoma patients was further characterized to
assess whether epitopes other than MART-12735
contributed to the immunodominant T cell response. Preliminary analyses
had shown that none of the MART-1/Melan A-specific CTL cultures
recognized peptide sequences other than MART-12735. To
further characterize the uniqueness of this recognition, the CTL clones
from the three patients described in the previous section were tested
for epitope specificity. In addition to MART-12735,
four MART-1/Melan A peptide sequences were selected
(MART-13139, MART-13240,
MART-13543, MART-15664) that had been
proposed by others as alternative T cell epitopes in the context of
HLA-A*0201 (40, 41). Without exception, all CTL clones analyzed
recognized uniquely MART-12735. An example is illustrated
for patient 4 (Table VII
). The
specificity of epitope recognition was not associated with limitations
in TCR repertoire. The TCR usage contrasts with the strict specificity
of the MART-12735 response and supports the
concept that immunodominance correlates with capacity to maintain a
broad TCR repertoire (42).
|
|
The specificity of the interaction between TCR and the
immunodominant region of the MART-1/Melan A molecule has never been
extensively analyzed in terms of peptide size requirements. To evaluate
this question, we synthesized size analogues encompassing overlapping
portions of the MART-12735 flanking regions. These
size analogues were then pulsed on T2 cells, and the reactivity
(IFN-
release) of three different CTL clones was assessed. The three
clones (A42, B10-98, and B10-106) utilized different Vß-chains and
had different cytokine release patterns (Fig. 1
A) and stringency of
subtype restriction (Fig. 2
). These
clones demonstrated, however, quantitatively similar expression of CD3,
TCR, CD54, CD56, Fas, and Fas ligand as determined by FACS analysis
(data not shown) and, like the rest of the CTL clones analyzed in this
study, their pattern of cytokine release reflected the TC1 type (43).
As previously noted, the decamer MART-12635 was more
efficiently recognized than MART2736 when pulsed in
equimolar concentrations on T2 cells (Fig. 1
B) (2).
Furthermore, binding affinity to HLA-A*0201 correlated with recognition
of MART-12635 and MART-12736
(125I-ß2m-HLA/125I-ß2m-HLA
+ 125I-ß2m x 100 = 67 and 14%,
respectively). A similar correlation was observed for other size
variants. The best binder among the four 12-mer sequences was
MART-12435, while the following three overlapping 12 mers
demonstrated lower affinity
(125I-ß2m-HLA/125I-ß2m-HLA
+ 125I-ß2m x 100 = 38, 11, 5, and
4, respectively). Similarly, among the 11 amino acid sequences, the
highest binding was observed for MART-12535
(125I-ß2m-HLA/125I-ß2m-HLA
+ 125I-ß2m x 100 = 22, 11, and 3
for MART-12535, MART-12636, and
MART-12737, respectively). Among 8-mer sequences,
MART-12835, which encompasses both anchor residues (P2
and P9) of the immunodominant nonamer MART-12735, had
good reconstitution values and was recognized
(125I-HLA/125I-HLA +
125I-ß2m x 100 = 61). In contrast,
MART-12734 and MART-12936, lacking either
the Ala at P2 or Val at P9, did not bind to HLA-A*0201
(125I-HLA/125I-HLA +
125I-ß2m x 100 = 3 and 13,
respectively) and were not recognized. Seven residue analogues did not
bind to the HLA-A*0201. In summary, binding and recognition of
MART-1/Melan A-immunodominant region: 1) requires the presence of both
Ala28 and Val35; and 2) has higher tolerance
for sequence extensions at the N terminus than at the C terminus of
MART-12735. MART-12735 does not have the
canonical Leu at P2, but has a C terminus highly compatible with the
HLA-A*0201 binding motif, suggesting P9 as the dominant anchor residue
for this peptide. It is possible that C-terminal variability could more
deeply affect binding to HLA-A*0201.
|
|
Given the uniqueness of MART-12735 as epitopic
determinant for MART-1/Melan A immunodominance in the context of
HLA-A*0201, we analyzed the stringency of its association with other
HLA-A*0201 variants. The CTL clones derived from patient 4 were
analyzed for cross-reactivity with EBV-B lines expressing various
HLA-A*02 subtypes and exposed to exogenous
MART-12735. In particular, the following subtypes
were selected: HLA-A*0204 (97 R
M), A*0206 (9 F
Y), and
A*0226 (152 V
E), representing single-residue variants from A*0201
and A*0205, differing from A*0201 by four residues and representing the
second-most common HLA-A*02 allele in the Caucasian (44) and melanoma
(4) population. The CTL clones exhibited different stringency of
cross-reactivity, which was partially dependent upon the cytokine
analyzed (Fig. 2
, AC). Clones A42 and B10-143
exhibited the highest level of specificity for the
HLA-A*0201/MART-12735 combination. Cross-reactivity with
HLA-A*0204 was noted in these two clones when GM-CSF release was
analyzed, suggesting that the absence of detectable IFN-
release was
not an absolute indication of lack of interaction between TCR and
HLA/peptide complex, but rather the result of declining avidity of the
TCR upon gradual modification of the HLA/peptide conformation.
The majority of the CTL clones recognized the combination
MART-12735/HLA-A*0204, and only B10-48 revealed
substantial cross-reactivity against HLA-A*0205 and
A*0206/MART-12735 complexes, establishing firmly that
among the HLA-A*02 subtypes analyzed, HLA-A*0204 is functionally the
closest allele to HLA-A*0201. HLA-A*0226 exhibited no cross-reactivity
with any of the HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL clones. Binding of
MART-12735 to HLA-A*0204 and A*0205 has been already
demonstrated (9). Therefore, an attempt was made to induce T cell
reactivity against this epitope by pulsing DC with
MART-12735 in patients 15, 19, and 20 (all of them were
A*0205). All such attempts were unsuccessful. HLA-A*0204 individuals
were not tested because we could not identify A*0204 among 200 HLA-A2
melanoma patients or 500 normal HLA-A2 Caucasian subjects, suggesting
that this allele is exceedingly rare in these populations (45).
HLA-A*0226 did not allow cross-reactive recognition of
MART-12735 or other canonical HLA-A*0201 epitopes such as
gp100209 or Flu M15866 by HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL.
The functional difference between HLA-A*0226 and A*0204 is striking
considering that both alleles vary from HLA-A*0201 by only one residue.
It is possible, however, that the R
M substitution at position 97
of HLA*0204 has only minor structural effects on the HLA/peptide
complex and does not affect binding (9). On the other hand, V
E
substitution in position 152 of the HLA-A*0226 allele (Fig. 1
) may
directly affect the ability of this allele to bind canonical HLA-A*0201
epitopes due to the multiple interactions of position 152 with pockets
C, D, and E (46). The ability of HLA-A*0226 to bind well-characterized,
high affinity ligands of HLA-A*0201 was therefore tested (Table I
X). None of the four peptides tested
could stabilize the HLA-A*0226/ß2m complex. Endogenous
processing and presentation of MART-1/Melan A by HLA-A*0226-expressing
autologous DC was not capable of inducing MART-1/Melan A-specific CTL
(Table II
). Similarly, DC infected with rVV-gp100 could not elicit
gp100 CTL. Exogenous loading of DC with 1 µM of
MART-12735 or gp100209-2 M (Tables
X and
XI) or Flu M15866 (data
not shown) failed to elicit a CTL response from postvaccination
PBMC.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As candidate epitopes for some of these MAA were identified, trials were conducted at the National Cancer Institute in which patients were immunized with a s.c. injection of peptide dissolved in IFA. Monitoring of patients PBMC revealed a powerful enhancement of MAA recognition in postvaccination CTL cultures (6, 7). Thus, peptide vaccination is very effective in stimulating HLA class I-restricted, MAA-specific T cell reactivity in vivo. Ignorance of the immunogenicity of MAA in association with other HLA alleles has, however, restricted their usage as immunogens to a subset of patients bearing the HLA allele associated with their identification. Because of this restriction, a whole protein vaccine that could be administered regardless of HLA phenotype or knowledge of epitopic determinant has been theorized.
Few lines of evidence suggest that MAA can yield T cell epitopes in association with HLA alleles different from those that originally led to their identification. So far, there is no evidence that MART-1/Melan A can be recognized in association with HLA alleles other than A*0201. In this study, we explored the suitability of MART-1/Melan A, a small m.w. protein, to function as an immunogen in association with other HLA-A class I alleles. It was postulated that an autologous system based on endogenous processing and presentation of whole Ag could allow equal opportunities to putative HLA/epitope combinations to induce T cell reactivity (18). The statistical power of the system is supported by the efficient induction of HLA-A*0201-restricted anti-MART-1 reactivity, suggesting that the inability to induce antitumor reactivity in association with HLA alleles other than HLA-A*0201 was not related to technical failure. It has been shown that the subdominant OVA5562 can function as an immunogen in the context of Kb only when the dominant sequence of OVA257264 is removed from the antigenic molecule (59). Similarly, the inability to identify non-HLA-A*0201-restricted antitumor responses in HLA-A*0201 patients could, admittedly, be secondary to the dominance of MART-12735. Subdominant CTL specificities could have been hidden by the predominant expansion of MART-12735-reactive, HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL. Such a possibility, however, appears unlikely considering the failure to identify non-HLA*A-0201-restricted MART-1/Melan A-specific clones from early CTL cultures in HLA-A*0201-expressing patients and the inability to induce tumor-specific cultures in non-HLA-A*0201-expressing patients.
The stringency of the requirements for MART-1 immunodominance appears extreme: only one peptide of intermediate affinity for HLA-A*0201 (55) shows specific activation of bulk and clonal CTL. This epitope (MART-12735), and possibly its N-terminal extension, are therefore uniquely responsible for the prevalence of the observed anti-MART-1/Melan A responses. Thus, the immunodominance of this small MAA does not appear to be related to molecular size or broadness of epitope repertoire but rather to a unique, yet unexplained, MHC/peptide interaction with the potential of the mature human TCR repertoire. Previous work has shown that, within the domain of HLA-A*0201 binding motif, single residue substitutions at different positions of the MART-12735 peptide are relatively permissive to CTL recognition, with the exception of position 5 (60). Conservation of the glycine at position 5 and a search for compatible sequences in available protein databases led to the identification of multiple-potential MART-12735 mimicry analogues occurring in a variety of common human pathogens that could be recognized by MART-12735-specific CTL (60). These findings underlie the hypothesis that T cells might encounter a variety of analogue peptide sequences in vivo and that epitope mimicry may play a role in modulating the CTL response to MART-12735. It is possible that the serendipitous similarity of MART-12735 to other common epitopes might determine its unique role as an MAA in the context of HLA-A*0201.
MART-1 immunodominance is also highly restricted by the HLA polymorphism. Not only were we unable to generate CTL reactivity in association with HLA class I alleles different from HLA-A*02, but we also could not raise MART-1/Melan A reactivity in association with alleles belonging to the A2-like supertype shown to bind canonical HLA-A*0201 peptides (8) including MART-12735 (9). It is important to emphasize that the uniqueness of the HLA-A*0201/MART-12735 combination cannot be generalized, since other Ags are capable of stimulating CTL reactivity in association with different HLA-A*02 alleles (39).
The conclusion suggested by this study is that the suitability of a particular Ag/HLA combination as an immunogen cannot be assumed based on HLA binding motif nor structural relatedness among HLA molecules. Evidence of immunogenicity should be sought for each MAA/allele combination at an empirical level by identifying naturally occurring epitopes in relevant CTL populations. In particular, small m.w. proteins cannot be assumed to be comparable immunogens across the HLA polymorphism. Whole Ag vaccines, although conceptually appealing, may not, in practical terms, offer any additional advantage over peptide-based vaccination strategies.
|
|
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: MAA, melanoma-associated Ags; CM, culture medium; DC, dendritic cells; MART-1, melanoma Ag recognized by T cells; rFP, recombinant fowl pox virus; rVV, recombinant vaccinia virus; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; gp100, glycoprotein 100; GM-CSF, granulocyte/macrophage-CSF; ß2m, ß2-microglobulin; 125I-ß2m, 125I-labeled ß2m. ![]()
Received for publication December 16, 1997. Accepted for publication March 11, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Chapatte, M. Ayyoub, S. Morel, A.-L. Peitrequin, N. Levy, C. Servis, B. J. Van den Eynde, D. Valmori, and F. Levy Processing of Tumor-Associated Antigen by the Proteasomes of Dendritic Cells Controls In vivo T-Cell Responses. Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 66(10): 5461 - 5468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lucchese, J. Willers, A. Mittelman, D. Kanduc, and R. Dummer Proteomic Scan for Tyrosinase Peptide Antigenic Pattern in Vitiligo and Melanoma: Role of Sequence Similarity and HLA-DR1 Affinity J. Immunol., November 15, 2005; 175(10): 7009 - 7020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Matsueda, H. Takedatsu, A. Yao, M. Tanaka, M. Noguchi, K. Itoh, and M. Harada Identification of Peptide Vaccine Candidates for Prostate Cancer Patients with HLA-A3 Supertype Alleles Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 6933 - 6943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mantovani, B. Palermo, S. Garbelli, R. Campanelli, G. Robustelli della Cuna, R. Gennari, F. Benvenuto, E. Lantelme, and C. Giachino Dominant TCR-{alpha} Requirements for a Self Antigen Recognition in Humans J. Immunol., December 1, 2002; 169(11): 6253 - 6260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Wang, R. Turner, B. M. Baker, and W. E. Biddison MHC Allele-Specific Molecular Features Determine Peptide/HLA-A2 Conformations That Are Recognized by HLA-A2-Restricted T Cell Receptors J. Immunol., September 15, 2002; 169(6): 3146 - 3154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Luft, M. Rizkalla, T. Y. Tai, Q. Chen, R. I. MacFarlan, I. D. Davis, E. Maraskovsky, and J. Cebon Exogenous Peptides Presented by Transporter Associated with Antigen Processing (TAP)-Deficient and TAP-Competent Cells: Intracellular Loading and Kinetics of Presentation J. Immunol., September 1, 2001; 167(5): 2529 - 2537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Panelli, M. P. Bettinotti, K. Lally, G. A. Ohnmacht, Y. Li, P. Robbins, A. Riker, S. A. Rosenberg, and F. M. Marincola A Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte from a Melanoma Metastasis with Decreased Expression of Melanoma Differentiation Antigens Recognizes MAGE-12 J. Immunol., April 15, 2000; 164(8): 4382 - 4392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Valmori, F. Levy, I. Miconnet, P. Zajac, G. C. Spagnoli, D. Rimoldi, D. Lienard, V. Cerundolo, J.-C. Cerottini, and P. Romero Induction of Potent Antitumor CTL Responses by Recombinant Vaccinia Encoding a Melan-A Peptide Analogue J. Immunol., January 15, 2000; 164(2): 1125 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Wang, E. Bade, C. Kuniyoshi, L. Spears, G. Jeffery, V. Marty, S. Groshen, and J. Weber Phase I Trial of a MART-1 Peptide Vaccine with Incomplete Freund's Adjuvant for Resected High-Risk Melanoma Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 1999; 5(10): 2756 - 2765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Imro, S. Manici, V. Russo, G. Consogno, M. Bellone, C. Rugarli, C. Traversari, and M. P. Protti Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Restricted Cytotoxic T Cells Specific for Natural Melanoma Peptides Recognize Unidentified Shared Melanoma Antigen(s) Cancer Res., May 1, 1999; 59(10): 2287 - 2291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |