|
|
||||||||





*
Institute of Immunology, Vienna International Research Cooperation Center, Novartis Forschungsinstitut;
Institute of Immunology; and
Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CD68 represents a classical and widely used immunohistologic marker molecule for cells of the monocyte/macrophage and dendritic cell (DC)3 system (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). Flow cytometric analysis of CD68 expression was only recently introduced by us and allowed us to identify a small population of about 2% of PBMC that express intracellular CD68, but lack the monocyte marker CD14 and are negative for the lineage-associated marker molecules CD3 (T cells), CD19 (B cells), and CD16 (NK cells/neutrophils) (19). This absence of lineage-associated marker molecules together with the expression of the mucin-like lysosomal membrane protein CD68 reminded us of DC found in lymph nodes and skin (12, 13, 14).
Minute numbers of cells with DC precursor characteristics have been demonstrated previously in MNC fractions of peripheral blood (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29). They were described as HLA-DR+CD4+lin- leukocytes that comprise at least two phenotypically and functionally differing subsets. One subset coexpresses the granulomonocyte-associated molecules CD33, CD13, and CD11c. Phenotypically very similar cells have very recently been demonstrated in germinal centers of lymphoid tissues (30). In contrast, the other subset is negatively defined by the absence of or very weak expression of CD13, CD33, and CD11c and phenotypically resembles a recently identified DC precursor population in T cell areas (31) of lymphoid tissues. Thus, DC populations in lymphoid tissues might be repopulated by the observed peripheral blood DC precursors. HLA-DR+lin- peripheral blood cells also include various other important leukocyte progenitor/precursor populations, such as CD34+ circulating hemopoietic progenitor cells or putative CD4+ lymphoid precursors, which are difficult to identify using current procedures (32).
Given the enormous functional importance of DC in the induction and regulation of immune responses and our limited knowledge of in vivo DC development, differentiation, and migration, we considered it of substantial interest to analyze the observed CD68+lin- candidate DC precursor population in more detail. CD68+ peripheral blood leukocytes indeed include two DC precursor subsets, and both resemble DC populations in lymphoid tissues. CD68brightlin- cells phenotypically and functionally resemble plasmacytoid monocytes. The second CD68dim DC precursor-like population resembles myeloid-related cells and germinal center DC.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Murine mAbs of the following specificities were used in our study: CD68 (clone Ki-M7, IgG1), human myeloperoxidase (clone H-43-5, IgG1), human lysozyme (clone LZ-1, IgG1), CD3 (clone UCHT1, IgG1), and CD14 (clone MEM18, IgG1) obtained from An der Grub (Kaumberg, Austria); CD19 (clone HD37, IgG1) provided by Dr. B. Dörken (Berlin, Germany); HLA-DR (clone L243, IgG2a), CD34 (clone HPCA2, IgG1) and CD11c (clone Leu 12, IgG1) obtained from Becton Dickinson (San Jose, CA); CD45RA (clone MEM93, IgG1) provided by Dr. W. Horejsi (Prague, Czech Republic); EMBP (clone AHE-2, IgG1) provided by Dr. K.M. Skubitz (Minneapolis, MN); CD33 (clone WM-54, IgG1) obtained from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark); Ki-67 (clone MIB-1, IgG1) obtained from Dianova (Hamburg, Germany); CD16 (clone 3G8, IgG1) obtained from Caltag (San Francisco, CA); and CD13 (clone My7, IgG1) obtained from Coulter (Hialeah, FL). Abs specific for CD3 (clone VIT3b, IgG1), CD4 (clone VIT4, IgG2a), CD5 (clone CD5-5D7, IgG1), CD11b (clone LM-2, IgG1), and CD7 (clone CD7-6B7, IgG2a) were produced in our laboratory. CD54 (clone HA58) and CD86 (clone IT2.2.) were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). CD83 (clone HB15a) was obtained from Immunotech (Marseille, France).
Immunofluorescence staining
Membrane staining. For membrane staining, 50 µl of isolated MNC (107/ml) were incubated for 15 min at 0 to 4°C with 20 µl of conjugated mAb. Triple stainings were performed by first incubating cells with a mixture of biotinylated Abs specific for the lineage molecules CD14, CD3, CD19, and CD16 together with phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled Abs, then washed twice and subsequently incubated with the second step reagent streptavidin PerCP (Becton Dickinson). Afterward, cells were submitted to intracellular staining.
Intracellular staining. For suspension stainings of intracellular Ags we used the commercially available reagent combination Fix&Perm from An der Grub and followed the proposed procedure. In short, cells were first fixed for 15 min at room temperature (50 µl of cells plus 100 µl of formaldehyde-based fixation medium). After one washing with PBS, pH 7.2, cells were resuspended in 50 µl of PBS and mixed with 100 µl of permeabilization medium plus 20 µl of fluorochrome-labeled Ab. After a further incubation for 15 min at room temperature, cells were washed again and analyzed.
Indirect immunofluorescence stainings for the proliferation-associated nuclear Ag Ki-67 were performed on cytocentrifuged cells using a Cytospin-2 centrifuge (Shandon Southern Products, Astmoor, U.K.). Fixation and permeabilization were performed as described previously (33).
Flow cytometry
Flow cytometric analyses were performed with a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) equipped with a single laser emitting at 488 nm. For analysis of CD68 expression in lineage Ag-negative MNC, data for at least 60,000 cells were acquired and stored in list-mode files. FACS sortings were performed with a FACS Vantage flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).
Cells
Peripheral blood samples were obtained from healthy volunteers
and immediately processed. MNC were isolated by flotation on
Ficoll/Hypaque (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Lineage marker-negative
(lin-) MNC were obtained by first removing
rosette-forming cells with neuraminidase-treated sheep erythrocytes and
then by immunomagnetic depletion, as previously described (34), of all
cells reactive to a mixture of CD14 (clone MEM18), CD11b (clone LM-2),
CD3 (clone VIT3b), and CD19 (clone HD-37) Abs.
CD4+lin- cells were obtained by FACS sorting
of cells double stained for CD4 (FITC; clone VIT4) and lineage
molecules (PE; CD14, CD3, CD19, CD16) using a FACS Vantage flow
cytometer (Becton Dickinson). For subsorting on the basis of CD45RA
expression, purified CD4+lin- cells were
stained for CD45RA (PE) and FACS sorted into
CD4+lin-CD45RAbright and
CD4+lin-CD45RA-/dim cells. The
purity of all cell populations obtained by sorting was determined by
reanalysis by FACS and was >95%. Monocyte-derived DC (mdDC) were
generated in the presence of GM-CSF plus IL-4 with or without TNF-
as described previously (35, 36).
Cultivation of MNC subsets
Purified subsets of lin- MNC were cultured as described previously (37) for up to 7 days at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere and in the presence of 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with L-glutamine (2.5 mM), penicillin (125 IU/ml), streptomycin (125 µg/ml), and human plasma (10%) and in the presence or the absence of the following recombinant human (rh) cytokines: rhGM-CSF (100 ng/ml; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), rhIL-1 (100 U/ml; Novartis), rhIL-6 (10 ng/ml; Novartis) and rhIL-3 (100 U/ml; Behring, Marburg, Germany), trimeric human CD40 ligand (CD40L) fusion protein (200 ng/ml; provided by Dr. S. D. Lyman, Immunex, Seattle, WA).
Morphologic analysis
Both freshly isolated and cultured cells were morphologically analyzed in culture vessels using phase contrast microscopy or were cytocentrifuged on microscope slides (2 x 104 cells/slide) using a Cytospin-2 centrifuge (Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA), stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa, and then analyzed by light microscopy.
Thymidine incorporation assay
Thymidine incorporation by cultures of purified subsets of lin- MNC (5 x 103 cells/well) was measured after a total culture period of 72 h in the presence or the absence of the above-mentioned cytokines. [3H]thymidine (Amersham, Aylesbury, U.K.) was added to cultures 16 h before harvesting. Incorporated radioactivity was measured using a Top-Count microscintillation counter (Packard, Meriden, CT).
Mixed leukocyte reaction
Graded numbers of irradiated (30 Gy; 137Cs source) stimulator cells (subsets of lin- MNC) were added to constant numbers (5 x 104/well) of purified (>98%) allogeneic T cells in round-bottom 96-well tissue culture plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA). Stimulation of responding T cells was monitored by measuring [3H]thymidine incorporation on day 5 of culture as described above.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Double staining of PBMC for intracellular CD68
(x-axis) vs lineage marker molecules (mixture of
CD14, CD3, CD19, and CD16 Ab conjugates; y-axis) clearly
resolved a small population of CD68+lin- cells
(Fig. 1
). The size of this population
varied between 1.5 and 2.6% (mean, 1.9 ± 0.5%;
n = 5) of all MNC.
|
To further characterize this small
CD68+lin- cell population, we performed
triple staining experiments. For this purpose, one fluorochrome (PerCP)
was used for the combined exclusion of the lineage-associated molecules
CD3, CD19, CD16, and CD14 (as shown in Fig. 1
), allowing the use of
FITC and PE to analyze lin- cells for their expression of
intracellular CD68 (FITC) and a panel of informative marker molecules
(PE). Figure 2
shows a representative
phenotypic analysis of such gated CD68+lin-
cells. In total, five individual samples were tested.
|
As shown in Figure 2
, CD68+lin-
cells contain three distinct populations in terms of HLA-DR and CD68
expression. Two populations, clearly distinct in their CD68 expression
density, coexpress HLA-DR. The strongly CD68-positive (termed the
CD68brightlin- subset) and the second subset
with clearly lower CD68 expression density (termed the
CD68dimlin- subset) also differ in their
HLA-DR expression intensity. CD68brightlin-
cells show considerably weaker HLA-DR staining than
CD68dimlin- cells (Fig. 2
). The
CD68brightlin- and
CD68dimlin- subsets represent, on the average
(n = 5), 0.4 ± 0.2 and 0.3 ± 0.2%,
respectively, of adult blood MNC (Table I
). The third CD68+ subset
clearly distinguishable in this staining profile differs in two
respects from the other two subsets. It lacks HLA-DR and has a CD68
staining intensity that lies between those of the two
CD68+/HLA-DR+ populations. This subset
represents 1.2 ± 0.3% of all MNC.
|
The three above-described subsets are also heterogeneous in terms
of their CD4 expression pattern. The
CD68brightlin- subset is strongly
positive for CD4 (Fig. 2
). The CD68dimlin-
subset also expresses CD4, but the intensity is slightly lower.
CD68+lin- cells with intermediate CD68
staining intensity lack CD4 expression. The proportions of
CD68+lin- cells coexpressing CD4 and HLA-DR
are virtually identical.
CD45RA molecule
In all five experiments the CD68brightlin- subset was found to strongly express CD45RA, whereas the CD68dimlin- subset was CD45RA negative to only weakly positive.
CD33 and CD13 molecules
Similar expression patterns were observed for the two GM-associated marker molecules CD33 and CD13. The CD68brightlin- subset consistently lacks CD33 and CD13; the CD68dimlin- and the CD68 intermediate density subsets are positive for both molecules. The highest CD33 expression density was observed in all experiments for the CD68dimlin- subset.
CD11b and CD11c molecules
The ß2 integrin molecule CD11b is absent from both, CD68brightlin- and CD68dimlin- subsets. Cells with intermediate CD68 density coexpress CD11b. A somewhat different staining pattern was found for CD11c. The CD68brightlin- subset lacks CD11c, whereas the CD68dimlin- subset is strongly CD11c positive. Cells with intermediate CD68 expression density are CD11c weakly positive to negative.
CD5 and CD7 molecules
Within the population of CD68+lin- cells, only CD68dimlin- cells coexpress CD5. The pan T/NK cell marker molecule CD7 is absent from CD68+lin- cells.
CD34 molecule
CD34 expression was, in all five experiments, restricted to CD68- cells.
Lysosomal protein expression
Virtually all CD68+lin- cells lack the highly selective pan-granulomonocytic lysosomal marker molecule MPO (38). The intracellular marker molecule of basophils and eosinophils, eosinophil major basic protein (39) is expressed, but is restricted to CD68+Lin- cells with intermediate CD68 density.
Together these data show that the two identified subsets CD68brightlin- and CD68dimlin- share phenotypic characteristics with DC.
Purification of CD68brightlin- and CD68dimlin- subsets
To further investigate the nature of the
CD68brightlin- and
CD68dimlin- subsets we purified these two
populations. Because the detection of intracellular CD68 requires
fixation and precludes sorting of viable cells, an alternative strategy
had to be followed for purification of viable
CD68brightlin- and
CD68dimlin- cells. The best way appeared to be
FACS sorting of lin- MNC into
CD4+CD45RAbright and
CD4+CD45RAdim/- cell fractions. This strategy
is based on our observation (see Fig. 2
) that
CD68brightlin- and
CD68dimlin- cells both coexpress CD4, but
differ in CD45RA expression. CD68brightlin-
cells are also CD45RAbright;
CD68dimlin- cells are CD45RA dim to negative.
Figure 3
shows an example of the sort
window settings used in these experiments. Pre-enriched MNC (see
Materials and Methods) were first sorted for
CD4+lin- cells (SORT I). Sorted
CD4+lin- cells were then stained for CD45RA
and sorted again for CD45RAbright and
CD45RAdim/- cells (SORT II). Triple stainings for CD68,
CD4, and lin molecules, performed in parallel, confirmed that all
CD4+lin- cells were CD68+ and
subdivided into CD68bright and CD68dim subsets
(data not shown).
|
The two subsets of CD68+lin- MNC
clearly differ in their morphologic appearance (see cytospin
preparations stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa in Fig. 3
).
CD68brightlin- cells are round, with round or
lobulated nuclei and abundant cytoplasm.
CD68dimlin- cells are of similar size, but
differ from CD68brightlin- cells in that they
have a more ruffled cell shape with irregularly shaped and multilobed
nuclei. In addition, cells of the
CD68brightlin- subset were more vacuolated
than CD68dimlin- cells.
Growth characteristics of CD68brightlin- and CD68dimlin- cells
To further analyze the stage of differentiation and lineage
restriction of the two subsets, we tested their in vitro proliferation
and differentiation capacities in the presence of cytokines. We first
analyzed the myelopoietic differentiation potential of isolated
CD68brightlin- and
CD68dimlin- subsets using the cytokine
combination GM-CSF, IL-1, IL-3, and IL-6, which represents a powerful
stimulus for growth and myeloid differentiation of hemopoietic
progenitors (37). The following profound changes were observed when
stimulating purified CD68brightlin- cells with
this growth combination. Within 48 h large aggregates were formed
(Fig. 4
A). This was followed on day 5 by the development of
long thin DC projections (Fig. 4
B). In addition,
substantial proportions of cultured cells stimulated with GM-CSF, IL-1,
IL-3, and IL-6 expressed the proliferation-associated nucleoprotein
Ki-67 (21 and 26% in two experiments on day 4, respectively; Fig. 4
C). These observations prompted us to analyze the
effects of individual cytokines. We observed that addition of IL-3
alone induces cell cycling of CD68brightlin-
cells. These results were confirmed using [3H]thymidine
incorporation experiments (Fig. 4
D). Total cell
numbers stayed approximately constant over the analyzed 7-day culture
period and were equivalent in cultures supplemented with GM-CSF, IL-1,
IL-3, and IL-6 or with IL-3 alone (data not shown). The second,
CD68dimlin- subset did not show growth factor
dependency similar to that observed for
CD68brightlin- cells and did not proliferate.
Most of these cells rapidly lost viability, and individual cytokines or
cytokine combinations did not enhance viability. In comparison,
cultures of CD68brightlin- cells set up in
parallel clearly showed higher percentages of viable cells, and
viability was dependent on whether the culture medium was supplemented
with IL-3 (data not shown).
|
Given the DC-like features of in vitro cultured
CD68brightlin- cells, we analyzed their
capacity to induce allogeneic T cell proliferation. As shown in Figure 5
, after culture for 7 days in
above-described GM-CSF-, IL-1-, IL-3-, and IL-6-supplemented medium,
CD68brightlin- cells significantly induce
allogeneic T cell proliferation. They are similar in relative potency
in the MLR to DC generated from autologous CD14+ monocytes
in the presence of GM-CSF plus IL-4 stimulation (mdDC), but are less
efficient inducers of T cell proliferation than autologous mdDC
generated in parallel in the presence of GM-CSF, IL-4, and TNF-
.
|
Freshly isolated CD68brightlin-
cells, in marked contrast to CD68dimlin-
cells, show no specific features of granulomonocytic cells. They
express neither MPO (Fig. 2
), a hallmark molecule of granulomonocytic
differentiation (38), nor LZ (Fig. 6
A), a molecule
constituitively expressed by granulomonocytic cells that is
up-regulated in monocytes and macrophages upon activation (40, 41, 42, 43).
Even upon culture of CD68brightlin- cells with
the granulomonopoietic growth combination GM-CSF plus IL-1, IL-3, and
IL-6, we were unable to detect LZ or MPO in these cells (Fig. 6
B). Similarly, no induction of expression of the
monocyte-associated surface molecules CD14, CD11c, and CD33 occurred
(Fig. 6
B). The molecular features of in vitro
cultured (differentiated) CD68brightlin-
cells, therefore, are clearly different from those of freshly isolated
CD68dimlin- cells. The
CD68dimlin- population expresses LZ and is
positive for CD11c and CD33 (Figs. 2
and 6
A).
|
Both CD68brightlin- and
CD68dimlin- cell subsets lack significant
expression of the T cell costimulatory molecule CD86, but they are
clearly CD54 positive. Furthermore, both subsets lack expression of the
mature DC marker molecule CD83 (see Fig. 7
).
|
Grouard et al. (31) recently demonstrated that isolated tonsil
plasmacytoid monocytes can be induced by CD40L plus IL-3 stimulation to
acquire features of mature DC.
CD68brightlin- peripheral blood
leukocytes identified in our study share unique immunophenotypic
(CD68bright lin-, MPO-,
LZ-) and functional features (IL-3-dependent growth) with
plasmacytoid monocytes, suggesting that they may represent immediate
precursors of plasmacytoid monocytes. Therefore, we analyzed the effect
of CD40L costimulation on the acquisition of mature DC features by
CD68brightlin- cells. As shown in Figure 8
, stimulation of
CD68brightlin- cells for 7 days with IL-3 plus
CD40L significantly induces up-regulation of CD86 and CD54 molecules,
and most cells become positive for the mature DC marker molecule CD83.
In contrast, in the presence of IL-3 alone, the majority of cells
remain CD86 negative, and virtually all cells remain CD83 negative.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most striking finding of our study is that this
CD68brightlin- DC subset clearly differs from
granulomonopoietic cells and from the other,
CD68dimlin- DC subset based on the lack of
expression of all analyzed granulomonocyte-associated intracellular
(MPO-, LZ-) and cell surface
(CD33-, CD13-, CD11c-)
molecules. Furthermore, CD68brightlin- DC are
functionally distinguishable from granulomonopoietic precursors in that
they fail to acquire MPO, LZ, CD33, CD14, and CD11c expression when
stimulated in the presence of cytokines (37). We further observed that
cells with this unique myeloid marker-negative (my-)
CD68brightlin- phenotype can survive and enter
cell cycling if they are stimulated in vitro with IL-3. Other cytokines
or cytokine combinations previously shown to be important for in vitro
DC development from progenitors or monocytes, including GM-CSF, IL-1,
IL-4, IL-6, TNF-
, and TGF-ß, do not replace IL-3 in this function
(data not shown). Thus, on the basis of a bright intracellular CD68
expression pattern, we describe here a distinct subset of
IL-3-responsive DC precursors that lack all analyzed lineage features
of granulomonopoietic cells, suggesting that they arise from a
nonmyeloid progenitor cell differentiation pathway.
We show that the absence of expression of the intracellular lysosomal protein LZ clearly distinguishes CD68brightlin- cells from granulomonocytic cells as well as from the other CD68dimlin- subset. The distribution of LZ is of particular relevance for our study, since LZ is known as a highly sensitive and specific intracellular lineage marker molecule for granulomonopoietic cells (40, 42). Using a detection method identical with described in this study, we previously observed that LZ protein expression is rapidly induced during monopoietic differentiation and even precedes acquisition of (pro)monocyte morphology by hemopoietic progenitors (37). The observed distribution of LZ among the two subsets of DC included in the CD68+lin- population is interesting, since it shows a striking correlation with the distribution of the surface marker molecules CD33, CD13, and CD11c. Only CD68dimlin- peripheral blood DC express these myeloid-related molecules. Further analysis of these my+CD68dimlin- peripheral blood DC showed additional features (i.e., CD4+, CD5+, HLA-DRbright, CD45RA dim to neg, and ruffled cell shapes) previously described characteristic of myeloid peripheral blood DC precursors (23, 25, 46) and germinal center DC (30). The expression pattern of LZ thus further supports the concept that these DC are myeloid in origin (22).
The second, my-CD68brightlin- DC
precursor-like subset clearly shares characteristics with previously
described peripheral blood leukocyte populations. They are
phenotypically similar to previously described "immunologically
immature" peripheral blood DC precursors (lin-
HLA-DR+ CD11c-,
CD33dim/-, CD13dim/-)
(23, 24, 27) and closely resemble recently described CD2-
peripheral blood DC precursors (29). Positive identification based on
bright intracellular CD68 expression as shown in our study clearly
distinguishes CD68brightlin- blood DC from
early lymphoid cells (19) and from CD34+ circulating
hemopoietic progenitor cells, which are both negative or only weakly
CD68 positive. We demonstrate that CD34+ cells are, on the
average, fourfold less frequent among total MNC (on the average, 0.1%
of the total MNC) compared with
CD68brightlin- DC (Table I
).
As described above, based on phenotypic and functional criteria, the subset of CD68brightlin- DC clearly differs from granulomonopoietic cells. One may speculate, therefore, that these DC originate from a separate nonmyeloid progenitor cell differentiation pathway (47). Evidence for the existence of such a pathway has been presented recently (48). Further studies should analyze whether CD68 represents a useful marker for the identification of putative bone marrow progenitors of CD68brightlin- blood DC.
One key finding of our study is that CD68brightlin- DC respond in vitro to IL-3 stimulation. We show that IL-3 as a single cytokine maintains viability and induces cycling of CD68brightlin- cells. These features independently observed in our study together with phenotypic (lack of CD11c, CD13, and CD33 expression) and morphologic (round cell shape when freshly isolated) characteristics are highly reminiscent of a recently characterized population of DC precursors in T cell areas of human tonsils (31). Identical cells were previously identified in electron microscopy studies as T-associated plasma cells (49).
Apart from this, independent evidence presented in our study strongly supports our assumption that CD68brightlin- blood DC represent circulating precursors of T-associated plasma cells. Immunohistology studies previously demonstrated that T zone-associated plasmacytoid cells (plasmacytoid T cells) are discriminable from other lymphoid tissue-associated macrophage or DC populations in that they are brightly CD68+ (50, 51, 52) (later renamed plasmacytoid monocytes based on bright CD68 staining (51)), but negative for the classical myelomonocytic lineage marker molecules LZ (52, 53, 54) and MPO (52, 55). This unique lin-CD68bright/LZ-/MPO- phenotype also defines the small population of CD68brightlin- blood DC in our study. Phenotypic resemblance of the CD68brightlin- blood DC described here with plasmacytoid monocytes in lymphoid tissues is further supported by coexpression of HLA-DR, CD4, and CD45RA (50, 51, 54, 55).
Typical location of plasmacytoid monocytes around high endothelial venules (56) further argues that blood precursors continuously repopulate these cells. A high turnover rate of plasmacytoid monocytes, probably regulated by the rate of precursor cell immigration, is suggested from the higher frequency of these cells under certain pathologic conditions associated with reactive T cell infiltration or extravasation (50, 57, 58, 59, 60).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Herbert Strobl, Institute of Immunology, Vienna International Research Cooperation Center, Novartis Forschungsinstitut, University of Vienna, Brunnerstrasse 59, A-1235 Vienna, Austria. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cells; MNC, mononuclear cells; LZ, lysozyme; PE, phycoerythrin; lin-, lineage marker negative; mdDC, monocyte-derived dendritic cells; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; rh, recombinant human; CD40L, CD40 ligand; MPO, myeloperoxidase. ![]()
Received for publication August 1, 1997. Accepted for publication March 23, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. J. Exp. Med. 179:1109.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Greenberg Proposed immunologic models of the inflammatory myopathies and potential therapeutic implications Neurology, November 20, 2007; 69(21): 2008 - 2019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. Chinnery, M. J. Ruitenberg, G. W. Plant, E. Pearlman, S. Jung, and P. G. McMenamin The Chemokine Receptor CX3CR1 Mediates Homing of MHC class II-Positive Cells to the Normal Mouse Corneal Epithelium Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 1568 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jongstra-Bilen, M. Haidari, S.-N. Zhu, M. Chen, D. Guha, and M. I. Cybulsky Low-grade chronic inflammation in regions of the normal mouse arterial intima predisposed to atherosclerosis J. Exp. Med., September 4, 2006; 203(9): 2073 - 2083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.W. Cutler and R. Jotwani Dendritic cells at the oral mucosal interface. J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2006; 85(8): 678 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Platzer, A. Jorgl, S. Taschner, B. Hocher, and H. Strobl RelB regulates human dendritic cell subset development by promoting monocyte intermediates Blood, December 1, 2004; 104(12): 3655 - 3663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Hocht-Zeisberg, H. Kahnert, K. Guan, G. Wulf, B. Hemmerlein, T. Schlott, G. Tenderich, R. Korfer, U. Raute-Kreinsen, and G. Hasenfuss Cellular repopulation of myocardial infarction in patients with sex-mismatched heart transplantation Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2004; 25(9): 749 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Ota, R Amakawa, K Uehira, T Ito, Y Yagi, A Oshiro, Y Date, H Oyaizu, T Shigeki, Y Ozaki, et al. Involvement of dendritic cells in sarcoidosis Thorax, May 1, 2004; 59(5): 408 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. L. Jahnsen, E. Gran, R. Haye, and P. Brandtzaeg Human Nasal Mucosa Contains Antigen-Presenting Cells of Strikingly Different Functional Phenotypes Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., January 1, 2004; 30(1): 31 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Syme, J. C. L. Spurrell, E. K. Amankwah, F. H. Y. Green, and C. H. Mody Primary Dendritic Cells Phagocytose Cryptococcus neoformans via Mannose Receptors and Fc{gamma} Receptor II for Presentation to T Lymphocytes Infect. Immun., November 1, 2002; 70(11): 5972 - 5981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|