The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schirrmacher, V.
Right arrow Articles by von Hoegen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schirrmacher, V.
Right arrow Articles by von Hoegen, P.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 161: 563-570.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Loss of Endogenous Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus Superantigen Increases Tumor Resistance

Volker Schirrmacher1, Ulrich Beutner2, Marianna Bucur, Victor Umansky, Marian Rocha and Paul von Hoegen3

Division of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
From a cross between a tumor-susceptible mouse strain (DBA/2; D) and a tumor-resistant MHC-identical strain (B10.D2; D2) new recombinant inbred mouse strains were established over many generations of inbreeding and tumor resistance selection. Since resistance to the highly metastatic DBA/2 lymphoma variant ESb had an immunologic basis, and the two parental strains differed in endogenous viral superantigens (vSAGs), DNA of three D2xD recombinant inbred mouse lines was typed for endogenous mouse mammary tumor viruses using mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat- and env gene-specific probes. The resistant D2xD mice were very similar to the susceptible parental strain D in their Mtv Southern blots, except for the lack of a single band corresponding to Mtv-7, the provirus coding for the strong DBA/2 superantigen Mls-1a. A backcross analysis revealed that Mtv-7-negative F2 mice were significantly more resistant than Mtv-7-positive F2 mice. When Mtv-7 was reintroduced into the resistant lines by crossing them with either CBA/J or BALB/D2.Mls-1a, the mice became again more tumor susceptible. Finally, we demonstrate the ability to transfer immunoresistance and graft-vs-leukemia reactivity from tumor-resistant to tumor-susceptible mice.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
For a long time, we have been intrigued by the extraordinary immunoresistance of mice of the strain B10.D2 to highly metastatic tumor lines such as ESb and MDAY-D2 derived from the mouse strain DBA/2 (1, 2). Although the two mouse strains are identical at the MHC locus, the B10.D2 mice were able to reject the DBA/2 lymphoma cells regardless of whether they were injected via different routes (i.v., i.p., or intradermally), at different sites (including spleen and liver), and even in high numbers. If tumors developed, they later regressed, and the mice never developed metastases. In DBA/2 mice, in contrast, the syngeneic ESb cells were able to grow and metastasize and to escape humoral (3) as well as T cell-mediated immune defense mechanisms (4, 5). B10.D2 anti-ESb tumor resistance was sensitive to irradiation (6) and to depletion of CD4 and CD8 T cells, and these defects could be completely reconstituted by transfer of B10.D2 immune spleen cells (6). B10.D2 anti-ESb CTL responses were composed of a strong anti-DBA/2 minor histocompatibility (H) Ag CTL response and a weaker response to ESb-specific class I MHC (Kd)-restricted tumor-associated Ag (7). The frequency of B10.D2 CTL precursors for minor H was about 1 in 3,700, while the frequency of tumor-associated Ag-specific CTLP was about 1 in 17,000 (8).

To identify genes of potential importance for the described tumor resistance, the two strains, DBA/2 (D) and B10.D2 (D2), were crossed, and new recombinant inbred (RI)4 mouse strains were established over many generations of inbreeding and ESb tumor resistance selection (9). In previous studies we tested the capacity of immune cells from seven resistant lines, selected over >23 breeding generations, to transfer graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) and graft-vs-host (GVH) reactivity to ESb tumor-bearing DBA/2 mice. The results demonstrated that the various sublines differed in their capacity to transfer GVL without GVH (9, 10, 11).

We demonstrate in this study that several D2xD RI lines, when typed for mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) pro-viruses in their genome, showed a selective loss of one long terminal repeat (LTR) hybridization band that corresponds to Mtv-7. An open reading frame (ORF) in the LTR of Mtv-7 codes for the viral superantigen (SAG) 7 (Mls-1a), an autoantigen of DBA/2 that causes deletion of SAG-reactive T lymphocytes such as Vß6-positive T cells during thymus maturation (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). Suggestive evidence for a link between tumor resistance and absence of endogenous viral SAG is given by a backcross segregation analysis as well as by reintroduction of the SAG into the resistant line and the reappearance of tumor susceptibility.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor lines

The tumor line ESb is a highly metastatic spontaneous variant of the methylcholantrene-induced DBA/2 T lymphoma L5178Y/E (22). The cells, derived from the standard batch ESb 289 or from the more aggressive liver metastasis derived subline ESb-L, were grown in suspension culture as previously described (23).

Mice and tumor challenge

DBA/2J mice were obtained from Bomholtgard (Ry, Denmark), and B10.D2/nSn, CBA/J, and BALB/c mice were obtained from Harlan Olac (Bicester, U.K.). For challenge, mice were injected s.c. with 105 of three times washed tumor cells in 100 µl of PBS. While syngeneic DBA/2 mice died from development of visceral metastases (liver, spleen) within 2 wk (22), in tumor-resistant lines a local tumor started to grow within the first 10 days and then regressed. Mtv-7 (Mls-1a) congenic BALB/c (BALB/D2.Mls-1a) mice, originally bred in H. Festenstein’s laboratory (The London Hospital Medical College, London, U.K.), were obtained from the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (Lausanne, Switzerland). The experiment shown in Figure 4Go was performed on contract at BRL (Fullingsdorf, Switzerland). The BxD RI lines were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Reintroduction of Mtv-7+ into Mtv-7- D2xD mice leads to increased tumor susceptibility. Mtv-7 was reintroduced into D2xD1/9 mice by crossing them with BALB/D2.Mls-1a mice. This is shown in B by Southern blots with MMTV LTR of EcoRI-digested tail DNA (each lane represents an individual mouse of the respective strain). A, Upon challenge with ESb 289 tumor cells, 60% of the F1 mice developed tumor compared with 17% of D2xD-1/9 mice and 100% of DBA/2 mice.

 
Breeding and characterization of new D2xD RI lines

The breeding protocol that led to the establishment of tumor-resistant RI lines has been described (9). Breeding was performed in the specific pathogen-free animal facilities at the German Cancer Research Center.

DNA preparation and Southern blot analysis

Cell pellets were homogenized and DNA was prepared as previously described (24). Genomic DNA (10–20 µg) was digested to completion overnight with 10 U of EcoRI or PvuII restriction enzymes (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY)/µg of DNA. Samples were precipitated, lyophilized, and run on a 0.8% Tris-acetate-EDTA agarose gel. For Southern blot analysis, the gel was washed for 15 min with 0.27 M HCl and three times for 20 min each time with 0.5 M NaOH in 1.5 M NaCl and then was blotted onto a GeneScreen nylon membrane (NEF-983, DuPont, Bad Homburg, Germany) overnight. After washing the nylon membranes for 20 min with 20x SSC/0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, the DNA was UV cross-linked to the nylon. Membranes were prehybridized for 2 h at 42°C in a solution consisting of 50% formamide, 0.01% RNA from yeast (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), 5x SSC, 0.1% Denhardt’s solution (polyvinylpyrrolidone (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), Ficoll 400 (Sigma, Munich, Germany), BSA (Sigma)), 50 mM NaPP (Na2HPO4 and NaH2PO4), and 1% SDS and then hybridized with the same solution with the addition of 50 ng of random primed labeled MMTV LTR (19, 25) and MMTV env probes (26) for 16 to 18 h at 42°C. Filters were washed three times with 2x SSC/0.1% SDS for 30 min at 68°C and exposed for 1 to 3 days at -80°C on x-ray film Kodak X-OMAT AR (Sigma).

GVL test

Recipient DBA/2 mice were sublethally irradiated on day -1 with 5 Gy and inoculated on day 0 with 104 ESb cells i.v. Immune spleen cells (ISPL; 2 x 107) from donor mice were transfered on day 1 to test for their GVL activity. Donor mice were immunized by i.v. inoculation of 105 ESb tumor cells 7 days before removal of the spleens.

Biostatistics

The log-rank test was applied to evaluate whether the survival curves of experimental groups differed significantly. Exact tests were performed by means of the software package Stat Xact (Cytel, San Diego, CA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Establishment of new D2xD RI mouse lines

New RI lines that are resistant to the DBA/2 mouse lymphoma ESb were derived from a cross between the ESb tumor-resistant strain B10.D2 (D2) and DBA/2 (D). While susceptibility was dominant in the F1 generation, segregation of susceptibility and resistance occurred in F2. Ten RI lines were eventually established after repeated colony breeding, tumor challenge, and selection. From the best breeding line (D2xD-1) we established 10 sublines by strict brother-sister mating. Sublines derived from D2xD-1 in the F17 generation differed in coat color; while D2xD-1/2 and D2xD-1/8 were dilute black, D2xD-1/9 and the other lines were dilute brown, like the parental line DBA/2. No linkage of ESb tumor resistance was seen to coat color genes (2). In the present study 3 of the 10 sublines were selected for detailed analysis and immortalized by embryo freezing.

Mtv provirus typing reveals selective loss of Mtv-7 in D2xD RI lines

Mtv provirus typing of the new tumor-resistant lines was performed from mouse tail DNA after restriction enzyme digestion (Figs. 1Go and 2). Southern blot hybridization was performed with two different Mtv probes, one containing the LTR region and the other containing the envelope gene (env) of MMTV. Figure 1Go shows the Southern blots obtained when using the restriction enzyme PvuII for DNA digestion. Different band patterns were obtained with DNA from the two parental lines (Fig. 1Go, lanes 1 and 5). From their m.w. and published data (27, 28), correlations could be made with known Mtv provirus types. Thus, in DBA/2 mice, bands corresponding to Mtv-1, -6, -7, -8, -11, -13, -14, and -17 could be identified from PvuII-digested DNA. Bands corresponding to Mtv-1, -6, -7, and -13 were lacking in DNA from the ESb tumor-resistant strain B10.D2 and from the RI strain BxD-6, derived from a cross between C57 BL/6 and DBA/2 (BxD; Fig. 1Go, lane 6). When rehybridizing the washed filters with the env probe, only five bands (instead of 10 with the LTR probe) were seen. Interestingly, B10.D2 and BxD-6 mice, which are both ESb tumor resistant, showed differences in LTR and env patterns (Fig. 2Go). DNA from the three D2xD RI lines, 2 (lane 2), 8 (lane 3), and 9 (lane 4), showed hybridization patterns with Mtv LTR and env probes very similar to those of the susceptible parental strain DBA/2. A single band, however, was lacking when typing was performed with the LTR probe. This band corresponds to Mtv-7, the provirus coding for the strong DBA/2 SAG Mls-1a (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). These results suggest that resistance to the ESb tumor in the RI strains correlates with the absence of Mtv-7.



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Southern blot typing with Mtv provirus probes of PvuII-digested DNA from parental and tumor-resistant RI mouse lines. The new D2xD RI lines (lanes 2–4) from the cross of ESb tumor-susceptible syngeneic DBA/2 (lane 5) and resistant B10.D2 (lane 1) mice show hybridization patterns with MMTV LTR and env probes that are very similar to DBA/2. Only one LTR band (no. 9) is lacking. This corresponds to Mtv-7. The Mtv types of DBA/2 are represented by the PvuII bands as follows: Mtv-1 (no. 4, a and b), Mtv-6 (no. 7 and 8), Mtv-7 (no. 9), Mtv-8 (no. 1b and 6b), Mtv-11 (no. 6a), Mtv-13 (no. 5), Mtv-14 (no. 3a), and Mtv-17 (no. 3b). B10.D2 carries Mtv-8 (no. 1b and 6b), Mtv-9 (no. 3a), and Mtv-17 (no. 3b).

 


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Southern blot typing with Mtv provirus probes of EcoRI digest DNA from parental and tumor-resistant RI mouse lines. The new D2xD RI lines (lanes 2–4) from the cross of ESb tumor-susceptible syngeneic DBA/2 (lane 5) and resistant B10.D2 (lane 1) mice show hybridization patterns with MMTV LTR and env probes very similar to those of DBA/2. Only one band (no. 3) that hybridizes with env and LTR is lacking. This corresponds to Mtv-7. The Mtv types of DBA/2 are represented by the EcoRI bands as follows: Mtv-1 (no. 7b and 9), Mtv-6 (no. 2a), Mtv-7 (no. 3), Mtv-8 (no. 6a and 7a), Mtv-11 (no. 2b and 8), Mtv-13 (no. 5 and 8), Mtv-14 (no. 10), and Mtv-17 (no. 4 and 6a). B10.D2 carries Mtv-8 (no. 7a), Mtv-9 (no. 4 and 6b), and Mtv-17 (no. 4 and 6a).

 
Figure 2Go shows the corresponding Mtv patterns obtained with EcoRI-digested DNA. Again, different patterns were seen with DNA from either DBA/2 or B10.D2. There were few LTR bands in common, while many additional bands were seen in DBA/2 that were not seen in B10.D2. Interestingly, the LTR pattern of BxD-6 mice, which after PvuII digestion looked very similar to that of B10.D2, were seen to share some bands (no. 2, 8, and 10) with DBA/2 that were not seen in B10.D2. EcoRI typing of the DNA from the new resistant lines clearly revealed a pattern very close to that of the susceptible parental strain DBA/2. However, all resistant lines (lanes 2–4) were lacking one particular band (no. 3) in the range of 14.8 kb containing Mtv-7 that was detected with both Mtv LTR and env probes in EcoRI-digested DBA/2 DNA. In addition, the new resistant lines had several DNA fragments (bands 2, 9, and 10) in common with DBA/2 that are lacking in B10.D2. Taken together, our results of Mtv typing of three independent lines using two different probes and two different restriction enzymes revealed a very close similarity of the new resistant lines with DBA/2 and a selective loss of Mtv-7.

Backcross analysis of tumor resistance and Mtv type

To further substantiate a possible linkage between tumor resistance and the presence or the absence of Mtv-7, we performed a backcross analysis (Fig. 3Go). D2xD-1/9 mice were crossed with the parental line DBA/2, and offspring from the F2 generation were typed by Southern blot analysis of tail DNA for the presence or the absence of Mtv-7. They were then challenged with ESb tumor cells to test for tumor resistance. The survival curves of tumor-injected mice of the two parental strains DBA/2 and D2xD-1/9 as well as those of the F1 and F2 generation are shown in Figure 3GoA. While DBA/2 and F1 mice were highly susceptible, D2xD-1/9 mice and F2 generation mice were mostly resistant upon challenge with ESb 289, the standard batch of ESb tumor cells. Figure 3GoB shows the results of an analysis in which the F2 generation mice were grouped according to their Mtv-7 type. The Mtv-7 negative mice were significantly (p = 0.039) more resistant than the Mtv-7-positive mice. The reason for the reduced resistance of the Mtv-7-negative mice compared with that of the F2 generation mice in Figure 3GoA is most likely that they were challenged with a more aggressive ESb variant (ESb-L instead of ESb 289). The backcross and Mtv-7 segregation analysis corroborates the original finding of a link between tumor resistance and absence of Mtv-7, but also clearly indicates the contributions of other genes to the overall resistance of B10.D2 mice.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Back-cross analysis of tumor resistance and Mtv type. A, Survival curves of D2xD-1/9 (II) and DBA/2 (D; I) mice as well as (D2xD-1/9xD) F1 (III) and F2 (IV) backcross mice after s.c. inoculation of 105 tumor cells of the standard batch ESb 289 (7, 22). There were at least 10 animals/group. While in this experiment the F2 mice showed about 80% long term survival, F2 mice from the original B10.D2 x DBA/2 cross (n = 150) showed about 70% ESb tumor resistance and long term survival (2). B, Thirty individual F2 backcross mice from A (IV) were marked, typed as described in Figure 1Go for Mtv-7, and challenged by s.c. inoculation of 105 tumor cells of the aggressive tumor variant ESb-L (34). The Mtv-7-negative mice were significantly more resistant than the Mtv-7-positive mice.

 
Reintroduction of Mtv-7 into D2xD RI mice leads to increased tumor susceptibility

If the genetic basis for tumor resistance in B10.D2, BxD-6, and the new D2xD lines is different, a cross between these strains might lead to genetic complementation. Different crosses between the resistant lines were therefore generated and tested for ESb tumor resistance. No complementation and regeneration of tumor susceptibility was seen in any of the crosses between these mouse strains (data not shown). Additional crosses were performed between the resistant line BxD-6 and either CBA/J mice, which express Mtv-7 or BALB/c mice which do not express Mtv-7. The cross with CBA/J, but not that with BALB/c, led to genetic complementation so that tumor resistance was reduced from 100 to 10% (Table IGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Mtv segregation and ESb tumor resistance in new and established H-2d recombinant inbred mice

 
Since CBA/J mice differ from DBA/2 by several Mtv loci and also express Mtv-9, which is absent from DBA/2, we performed an additional more selective cross using as partner the line BALB/D2.Mls-1a (Fig. 4Go). This line is an Mls-1 congenic mouse line to BALB/c (Mls-1b). The Mls-1a (Mtv-7) gene was derived from DBA/2. When the tumor-resistant line D2xD-1/9 was crossed with this Mtv-7-positive line, a partial complementation effect was observed. Upon challenge with ESb 289, 11 of 20 (60%) of the F1 mice developed tumor compared with 1 of 6 (17%) of the D2xD-1/9 mice and all six (100%) of the DBA/2 mice. Three of the 11 tumor-bearing mice were eventually able to reject the tumor, showing that complementation by Mtv-7 was only partial. This is also obvious from the fact that 9 of the 20 challenged mice did not develop tumors (Fig. 4GoA).

Further analysis of the F1 mice was performed to test for a possible basis for the heterogeneity seen in tumor susceptibility. Response heterogeneity was not due to sex influence. All mice were Mtv-7 typed and found to be positive as expected (Fig. 4GoB, group I).

In Table IGo we have summarized the main results about Mtv segregation in the newly established RI lines and from the backcross and genetic complementation analysis and compared them to the segregation in already established BxD RI lines. It can be seen that in the already established BxD RI lines from The Jackson Laboratory the six different Mtv types of DBA/2 shown are distributed differently. None of the 10 BxD RI lines tested (only four shown) was like the newly selected D2xD lines, which differ from DBA/2 only by a selective loss of Mtv-7.

Immune cells from tumor-resistant D2xD mice transfer GVL reactivity to tumor-susceptible D mice

Mtv typing revealed that the new immunoresistant D2xD RI strains were more similar to the parental strain D than to D2. Therefore, we were interested to test whether antitumor immune cells from D2xD RI strains could still transfer, like D2, GVL reactivity into the tumor-bearing parental strain D. We chose a test system in which DBA/2 recipients were first sublethally irradiated with 5 Gy and then injected with 104 ESb tumor cells i.v. One day later, different groups of such mice (10 animals each) were treated i.v. by ISPL from either B10.D2 or D2xD-1/9 mice that had been preimmunized by i.v. inoculation of 105 ESb tumor cells 1 wk previously. As shown by the survival curves in Figure 5Go, nontreated control mice died within 10 days, while immune cells from D2xD mice were capable of transferring GVL reactivity, leading to long term (>100 days) survival. Adoptive immunotherapy with ISPL from B10.D2 mice also led to effective GVL reactivity, but some mice were affected later by chronic and fatal GVH disease (9, 10, 11). Adoptive immunotherapy with syngeneic anti-ESb immune peritoneal effector cells (Fig. 5Go, DBA/2 PEC) was less effective, with 50% of the mice dead after 30 days.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Immune cells from D2xD-resistant mice transfer GVL reactivity to susceptible D mice. Recipient DBA/2 mice were sublethally irradiated with 5 Gy and 1 day later were injected with 104 ESb 289 tumor cells i.v. Donor B10.D2 or D2xD-1/9 mice were immunized 1 wk before cell transfer by i.v. inoculation of 105 ESb 289 tumor cells. One day after tumor inoculation into recipients, 2 x 107 ISPL from the donor mice were transfered i.v. into separate groups (n = 10) of the recipients. One group was left untreated as a control. ISPL from D2xD mice were able to transfer GVL reactivity without causing GVH disease (GVHD). Syngeneic effector cells were raised in DBA/2 mice by primary immunization in the ear pinna with a subtumorigenic dose of 5 x 104 live ESb 289 cells with 107 100-Gy-irradiated ESb cells. The peritoneal effector cells (PEC), harvested 3 days later, at the peak of the in situ secondary antitumor CTL response, were transfered in a separate group at a comparable cell dose of 2 x 107 cells.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We previously reported on the generation of new recombinant inbred tumor-resistant mouse strains in which genetic separation of GVL and GVH reactivity was achieved (9). The resistance selected against one DBA/2-derived malignant tumor (ESb) extended to other DBA/2 malignant tumors (SL2, MDAY-D2) and was thus of more general significance. Here we demonstrate that the resistant D2xD recombinant inbred mice were very similar to the susceptible parental strain D in their Mtv proviral genes except for Mtv-7, the provirus coding for the strong minor lymphocyte-stimulating Ag Mls-1a (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21).

MMTVs exist either as exogenous infectious virus or as endogenous provirus (Mtv). They are lymphotropic and depend on SAG-mediated T cell activation in their live cycle (12, 21). Mtv SAGs are type 2 transmembrane glycoproteins encoded by an ORF of the 3' LTR of the provirus and associate with class II MHC molecules. B cells transfected with a cDNA construct containing the LTR ORF from Mtv-7 stimulate the proliferation of Mls-1a-responsive T cells expressing TCR Vß6 (B. Huber, personal communication). A polymorphic region in the carboxyl terminus of Mtv SAGs determines its Vß domain specificity (13, 14). About 28 endogenous Mtv loci are found in all the common mouse strains (28). Since most mouse strains contain about 20 different Vß TCR chains, each Mtv-SAG shows reactivity with 3 to 30% of all {alpha},ß CD4 T cells, which often belong to one of four different Vß subpopulations (29). This extraordinarily high frequency of SAG-responsive T cells in nonexpressing mice is 10- to 50-fold higher than the response to allogeneic MHC class II molecules and 500- to 2000-fold higher than the response to conventional protein Ags. All of the 19 or more tested laboratory mouse strains express one to eight endogenous Mtvs (28, 29, 30, 31), all of which can affect the TCR repertoire. As self proteins, Mtv SAGs alter the peripheral T cell repertoire by intrathymic deletion of Vß-reactive T cells. Since without such reactive T cells exogenous homologous MMTV cannot propagate in these mice, Mtv SAGs can be considered as determinants of resistance to homologous MMTV. While the presence of germline proviruses may reflect an evolutionary mechanism of protection against horizontal transmission of MMTV, it also may carry a potential risk of increasing susceptibility to unrelated infectious agents and diseases.

It has been shown that polyoma tumor susceptibility in C3H mice is due to the presence of Mtv-7 SAG. This abrogates Vß6 T lymphocytes, which play a role in polyoma tumor immunosurveillance (32). In another system, a novel Mtv SAG contributes to development of spontaneous B cell lymphomas in SJL mice. In this case, the Mtv SAG stimulates CD4 Vß-16 T cells to release cytokines required for tumor growth (33). Thus, in the two tumor systems of C3H and SJL mice, endogenous Mtv SAGs are required for tumor development, but the strategies are different, involving stimulation of CD4 T cells in one case and deletion of CD8 T cells in the other. MMTV can influence tumors in many ways, either directly, as in mammary carcinogenesis, or indirectly, as in many other tumor systems. Mtv SAGs can influence the TCR repertoire in vivo by deletion or stimulate peripheral T cells expressing certain vß chains. The genetic event (rearrangement of Mtv provirus genes, possibly through recombination and chromosome exchange) that led to the selective loss of Mtv-7 in this study is presently unknown. It is also not known when this event happened and whether it happened once or several times during the selection of the tumor-resistant lines. It is likely that the repeated ESb tumor challenge and resistance selection that preceded this analysis played a decisive role in this result. ESb cells have recently been shown to express Mtv-7, and Mtv-7 SAG-reactive CTLs could also be recently identified (our unpublished observations).

ESb tumors are highly aggressive lymphomas of DBA/2 mice, but they cannot grow in the new Mtv-7-negative RI strains derived from a cross with B10.D2. This is because the tumor cells are inducing strong host immune responses. We demonstrate that immune spleen cells from D2xD mice can transfer immunoresistance and GVL reactivity back to the tumor-susceptible mice. The GVL reactivity was stronger than that of syngeneic anti-ESb-immune peritoneal cells (Fig. 5Go).

When Mtv-7 was reintroduced by crossing D2xD mice with BALB/D2 (Mls-1a), the mice became more tumor susceptible (Fig. 4Go), while this was not the case in a cross with BALB/c (Mls-1b; Table IGo). Similarly, ESb tumor resistance of BxD-6 (Mtv7-negative) RI mice, established at The Jackson Laboratory from a cross of C57 Bl/6 and DBA/2 mice, could be reduced from 100 to 10% by reintroduction of Mtv-7 via a cross with CBA/J mice (Table IGo). In the previously established BxD RI lines that were not selected for ESb tumor resistance, there was an apparent random segregation of Mtv types (9) (Table IGo), while in the new D2xD RI lines ESb tumor resistance selection seems to have led to a selective absence of Mtv-7.

When the resistant mice were backcrossed to DBA/2, segregation of Mtv-7 in the F2 generation correlated with tumor susceptibility or resistance. Tumor resistance in these Mtv-7 backcross mice was not absolute, however, and appeared to depend on the malignancy of the tumor line used for challenge. Protection was less efficient against the highly malignant liver metastasis-derived subline ESb-L than to the standard line ESb-289 (Fig. 3Go). Also, Mtv-7 reintroduced tumor susceptibility only partially (Fig. 4Go). These results suggest that Mtv-7 is an important gene, but possibly not the only one contributing to the tumor resistance of B10.D2 mice against DBA/2 tumors. There may be genes in close proximity to Mtv-7, H-1, H-4, and/or Hbb (2) that also could contribute to B10.D2 ESb tumor resistance.

With regard to the test crosses of the resistant RI lines with BALB/c (which did not increase tumor susceptibility) and BALB/D2.Mls-1a (which increased tumor susceptibility in about 50% of the mice), the introduction of additional minor Ags and the phenomenon of hybrid resistance could have influenced the results. We previously found that ESb cells that are strongly rejected by B10.D2 are only rejected by about 80% of injected BALB/c mice. Furthermore, F1 mice from crosses of DBA/2 with BALB/c or B10.D2 mice survived longer after ESb challenge than DBA/2 mice, although they all were tumor susceptible and died eventually (34).

Susceptibility to chemically induced lymphomas of H-2d mouse strains described here correlated with the presence of Mtv-7, just as susceptibility to polyoma-virus induced tumors of H2k mouse strains correlated with Mtv-7. In both systems, T cell-mediated antitumor immunity seems to play a predominant role, but there appear to be differences with respect to the target Ags recognized. A strongly biased usage of Vß6 by polyoma virus-specific CD8 CTL was considered critical for anti-polyoma tumor effector cells in vivo. Deletion of Vß6 T cells by Mtv-7 would thereby reduce the T cell repertoire of antitumor effector cells. In the ESb lymphoma model analyzed here, the mechanism seems to be different. DBA/2-derived ESb tumor-specific CTLs were previously characterized as expressing Vß5 and Vß8.1 preferentially, but not Vß6 (23). We recently found that ESb tumor cells do not only express individually distinct class I MHC (Kd)-restricted CTL epitopes (23) but in addition proviral Mtv-7 at the RNA-level (unpublished observations). Upon transfer into B10.D2 or D2xD resistant mice that do not express Mtv-7 (Table IGo), Vß6 and possibly other T cells may become activated and, upon transfer into tumor-bearing DBA/2, may infiltrate ESb liver metastases. It seems from preliminary findings that in the ESb tumor model the tumor cells themselves express endogenous viral SAGs that can be recognized in tumor-resistant, but not in syngeneic, mice by Vß6 T cells.

Much further work is required to find out how SAG-reactive T cells might contribute to augment antitumor reactivity and how this can be exploited for adoptive immunotherapy. The contribution seems to be very effective, because we demonstrated that a single transfer of immune cells from tumor resistant to tumor-susceptible mice can cause complete tumor regression even in late stage advanced disease with macroscopic metastases in multiple organs (34). A prerequisite for this effectivity was a sublethal host irradiation by 5 Gy to prevent host-vs-graft reactivity. Without this, the GVL reactivity was much less pronounced (35). The therapy effects could be evaluated in individual tumor-bearing mice both quantitatively (36) and qualitatively (37) by new noninvasive methods such as 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (36) and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance microimaging (37). Following immune cell transfer, donor immune T cells were found to infiltrate liver metastases (36, 38) and to form clusters with a subset of host macrophages bearing the adhesion molecule sialoadhesin (38). These host macrophages possibly function as scavengers and APCs. The elucidation of basic mechanisms of this immunoresistance and cellular immunotherapy at the molecular and cellular levels may help to design new strategies for introducing effective GVL reactivity into the clinic. It will be most interesting to determine whether humans express SAGs that are encoded by endogenous retroviral genes. The observation of significant homology between a simian herpes virus gene and the MMTV CTR ORF (39) and of an EBV-associated SAG (40) may be important in this regard.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Brigitte Huber (Tufts University, Boston, MA) for helpful advice, Dr. Hans Acha-Orbea and Rose Lees for providing the Mls-1 congenic BALB/c mice, and Dr. Axel Benner (Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany) for help with biostatistic analysis.


    Footnotes
 
1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. V. Schirrmacher, Division of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, G0100, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail address: Back

2 Current address: University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Unit for Experimental Transplantation-Immunology, Würzburg, Germany. Back

3 Current address: Research and Development, Cancer Immunology, SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, rue de l’Institut 89, B-1330 Rixensart, Belgium. Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: RI, recombinant inbred; GVL, graft-vs-leukemia; GVH, graft-vs-host; MMTV, mouse mammary tumor virus; LTR, long terminal repeat; ORF, open reading frame; SAG, superantigen; ISPL, immune spleen cells. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Schirrmacher, V.. 1981. Immunogenetic studies on the resistance of mice to highly metastatic DBA/2 tumor cell variants. I. Effect of incompatibilties at H-2 or non-H-2 genes in normal and nude (nu/nu) mice. Invasion Metastasis 1:4.[Medline]
  2. Schirrmacher, V., S. Landolof, R. Zawatzky, H. Kirchner. 1981. Immunogenetic studies on the resistance of mice to highly metastatic DBA/2 tumor cell variants. II. Influence of minor histocompatibility antigens on tumor resistance, {gamma} interferon induction and cytotoxic response. Invasion Metastasis 1:175.[Medline]
  3. Davey, G. C., G. A. Carrie, P. Alexander. 1976. Spontaneous shedding and antibody induced modulation of histocompatibility antigens on murine lymphomata: correlation with metastatic spread. Br. J. Cancer 33:9.[Medline]
  4. Bosslet, K., V. Schirrmacher. 1981. Escape of metastasizing clonal tumor cell variants from tumor-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 154:557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Bosslet, K., V. Schirrmacher. 1982. High-frequency generation of new immunoresistant tumor variants during metastasis of a cloned murine tumor line (ESb). Int. J. Cancer 29:195.[Medline]
  6. Schirrmacher, V., U. Zangemeister-Wittke. 1994. {gamma}-Irradiation suppresses T-cell mediated protective immunity against a metastatic tumor in the afferent phase of the immune response but enhances it in the efferent phase if given before immune cell transfer. Int. J. Oncol. 4:335.
  7. Bosslet, K., V. Schirrmacher, G. Shantz. 1979. Tumor metastases and cell-mediated immunity in a model system in DBA/2 mice. VI. Similar specificity patterns of protective anti-tumor immunity in vivo and of cytolytic T cells in vitro. Int. J. Cancer 24:303.[Medline]
  8. Von Hoegen, P., P. Altevogt, V. Schirrmacher. 1987. New antigens presented on tumor cells can cause immune rejection without influencing the frequency of tumor-specific cytolytic T cells. Cell. Immunol. 109:338.[Medline]
  9. Schirrmacher, V., A. Griesbach, M. Gehring, B. Lehr. 1996. Genetic separation of GvL and GvH reactivity in new recombinant-inbred tumor-resistant mouse strains. Int. J. Oncol. 8:1035.
  10. Schirrmacher, V., P. von Hoegen, A. Griesbach, U. Zangemeister-Wittke. 1991. Specific eradication of micrometastases by transfer of tumor immune T-cells from MHC congenic mice. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 32:373.[Medline]
  11. Zangemeister-Wittke, U., V. Schirrmacher. 1991. Transfer of long-lasting tumor immunity by immune T cells from MHC congenic mice: migration, survival and tumor protectivity of cytotoxic donor cells. Biotherapy 3:319.[Medline]
  12. Acha-Orbea, H., H. R. MacDonald. 1995. Superantigens of mouse mammary tumor virus. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13:459.[Medline]
  13. Janeway, C. A. J.. 1991. Selective elements for the vß region of the T-cell receptor: Mls and the bacterial toxin mitogens. Adv. Immunol. 50:1.[Medline]
  14. Pullen, A. M., T. Wade, P. Marrack, J. W. Kappler. 1990. Identification of region of T-cell receptor ß chain that interacts with self-superantigen Mls-1a. Cell 61:1365.[Medline]
  15. Landolfo, S., F. Marcucci, V. Schirrmacher, H. Kirchner. 1981. Characteristics of alloantigen and cellular mechanisms responsible for {gamma}-interferon production in primary murine MLC. J. Interferon Res. 1:339.[Medline]
  16. Hermann, T., G. A. Waanders, Y. Chvatchko, H. R. MacDonald. 1992. The viral superantigen Mls-1a induces interferon-{gamma} but fails to trigger cytotoxicity. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:2789.[Medline]
  17. Woodland, D., M. P. Happ, J. Bill, E. Palmer. 1990. Requirement for cotolerogenic gene products in the clonal deletion of I-E reactive T cells. Science 247:964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Marrack, P., E. Kushnir, J. Kappler. 1991. A maternally inherited superantigen encoded by a mammary tumor virus. Nature 349:524.[Medline]
  19. Frankel, W. N., C. Rudy, J. M. Coffin, B. T. Huber. 1991. Linkage of Mls genes to endogenous mammary tumor viruses of inbred mice. Nature 349:526.[Medline]
  20. Webb, S. R., J. Sprent. 1993. Factors controlling the reactivity of immature and mature T cells to Mlsa antigens in vivo. Immunol. Rev. 131:169.[Medline]
  21. Luther, S. A., H. Acha-Orbea. 1997. Mouse mammary tumor virus: immunological interplays between virus and host. Adv. Immunol. 65:139.[Medline]
  22. Schirrmacher, V., G. Shantz, G. Clauer, D. Komitowski, H. P. Zimmermann, M. L. Lohmann-Matthes. 1979. Tumor metastases and cell-mediated immunity in a model system in DBA/2 mice. I. Tumor invasiveness in vitro and metastases formation in vivo. Int. J. Cancer 23:233.[Medline]
  23. Schirrmacher, V., H.-J. Schild, B. Gückel, P. von Hoegen. 1992. Tumor specific CTL response requiring interactions of four different types and dual recognition of MHC class I and class II restricted tumor antigens. Immunol. Cell Biol. 71:311.
  24. Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, K. Struhl. 1987. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  25. Beutner, U., W. N. Frankel, M. S. Cote, J. M. Coffin, B. T. Huber. 1992. Mls-1 is encoded by the long terminal repeat open reading frame of the mouse mammary tumor provirus Mtv-7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:5432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Majors, J. E., H. E. Varmus. 1983. Nucleotide sequencing of an apparent proviral copy of env mRNA defines determinants of expression of the mouse mammary tumor virus env gene. J. Virol. 47:495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kozak, C., G. Peters, R. Pauley, V. Morris, R. Michalides, J. Dudley, M. Green, M. Davisson, O. Prakash, A. Vaidya. 1987. A standardized nomenclature for endogenous mouse mammary tumor viruses. J. Virol. 61:1651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lee, B. K., E. M. Eicher. 1990. Segregation patterns of endogenous mouse mammary tumor viruses in five recombinant inbred strain sets. J. Virol. 64:4568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Scherer, M. T., L. Ignatowicz, G. M. Winslow, J. W. Kappler, P. Marrack. 1993. Superantigens: bacterial and viral proteins that manipulate the immune system. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 9:101.
  30. MacDonald, H. R., R. Schneider, R. K. Lees, R. C. Howe, H. Acha-Orbea, H. Festenstein, R. Zinkernagel, H. Hengartner. 1988. T-cell receptor vß use predicts reactivity and tolerance to Mls-encoded antigens. Nature 332:40.[Medline]
  31. Morris, V. L., E. Medeiros, G. M. Ringold, J. M. Bishop, H. E. Varmus. 1977. Comparison of mouse mammary tumor virus-specific DNA in inbred, wild and Asian mice, and in tumors and normal organs from inbred mice. J. Mol. Biol. 114:73.[Medline]
  32. Lukacher, A. E., Y. Ma, J. P. Carroll, S. R. Abromson-Leeman, J. C. Laning, M. E. Dorf, T. L. Benjamin. 1995. Susceptibility to tumors induced by polyoma virus is conferred by an endogenous mouse mammary tumor virus superantigen. J. Exp. Med. 181:1683.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Tsiagbe, V. K., J. Asakawa, A. Miranda, R. M. Sutherland, Y. Paterson, G. J. Thorbecke. 1993. Syngeneic response to SJL follicular center B cell lymphoma (reticular cell sarcoma) cells is primarily in vß16+ CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 150:5519.[Abstract]
  34. Schirrmacher, V., P. Beckhove, A. Krüger, M. Rocha, V. Umansky, K.-P. Fichtner, W. E. Hull, U. Zangemeister-Wittke, A. Griesbach, K. Jurianz, P. von Hoegen. 1995. Effective immune rejection of advanced metastasized cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 6:505.
  35. Schirrmacher, V.. 1979. Tumor metastases and cell-mediated immunity in a model-system in DBA/2 mice. V. Transfer of protective immunity with H-2 identical immune T cells from B10.D2 mice. Int. J. Cancer 24:80.[Medline]
  36. Fichtner, K. P., V. Schirrmacher, A. Griesbach, W. E. Hull. 1997. In vivo 1H-NMR microimaging with respiratory triggering for monitoring adoptive immunotherapy of metastatic mouse lymphoma. Magnetic Resonance Med. 38:440.
  37. Fichtner, K. P., V. Schirrmacher, A. Griesbach, W. E. Hull. 1996. Characterization of a murine lymphoma cell line by 31P-NMR spectroscopy, in vivo monitoring of the local antitumor effects of systemic immune cell transfer. Int. J. Cancer 66:484.[Medline]
  38. Rocha, M., V. Umansky, K. Lee, H.-J. Hacker, A. Benner, V. Schirrmacher. 1997. Differences between graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) and graft-versus-host (GvH) reactivity. I. Interaction of donor immune T cells with tumor and/or host cells. Blood 6:2189.
  39. Thomson, B. J., J. Nicholas. 1991. Superantigen function. Nature 351:530.[Medline]
  40. Sutkowski, N., T. Palkama, C. Ciurli, R. P. Sekely, D. A. Thorley-Lawson, B. T. Huber. 1996. An Epstein-Barr virus-associated antigen. J. Exp. Med. 184:971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Facchinetti, S. D. Santa, S. Mezzalira, A. Rosato, and G. Biasi
A Large Number of T Lymphocytes Recognize Moloney-Murine Leukemia Virus-Induced Antigens, but a Few Mediate Long-Lasting Tumor Immunosurveillance
J. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 174(9): 5398 - 5406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Müerköster, J. D. Laman, M. Rocha, V. Umansky, and V. Schirrmacher
Functional and in Situ Evidence for Nitric Oxide Production Driven by CD40-CD40L Interactions in Graft-versus-Leukemia Reactivity
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2000; 6(5): 1988 - 1996.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Muerkoster, M. Rocha, P. R. Crocker, V. Schirrmacher, and V. Umansky
Sialoadhesin-Positive Host Macrophages Play an Essential Role in Graft-Versus-Leukemia Reactivity in Mice
Blood, June 15, 1999; 93(12): 4375 - 4386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schirrmacher, V.
Right arrow Articles by von Hoegen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schirrmacher, V.
Right arrow Articles by von Hoegen, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS