The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cao, X.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cao, X.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 161: 6238-6244.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Lymphotactin Gene-Modified Bone Marrow Dendritic Cells Act as More Potent Adjuvants for Peptide Delivery to Induce Specific Antitumor Immunity1

Xuetao Cao2,3,*, Weiping Zhang3,*, Long He*, Zhifang Xie{dagger}, Shihua Ma*, Qun Tao*, Yizhi Yu*, Hirofumi Hamada{ddagger} and Jianli Wang*

Departments of * Immunology and {dagger} Cellular Biology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, and {ddagger} Department of Molecular Biotherapy Research, Japanese Foundation of Cancer Research, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Dendritic cells (DC) are regarded as attractive candidates for cancer immunotherapy. Our aim is to improve the therapeutic efficacy of DC-based tumor vaccine by augmenting DC preferential chemotaxis on T cells. Mouse bone marrow-derived DC were transduced with lymphotactin (Lptn) gene by adenovirus vector. The supernatants from Lptn gene-modified DC (Lptn-DC) were capable of attracting CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in a chemotaxis assay, whereas their mock control could not. Lptn expression of Lptn-DC was further confirmed by RT-PCR. Lptn-DC were pulsed with Mut1 peptide and used for vaccination. Immunization with the low dose (1 x 104) of Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC induced weak CTL activity, whereas the same amounts of Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC markedly induced specific CTL against 3LL tumor cells. A single immunization with 1 x 104 Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC could render mice resistant to a 5 x 105 3LL tumor cell challenge completely, but their counterpart could not. The protective immunity induced by Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC depends on both CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells rather than NK cells in the induction phase and depends on CD8+ T cells rather than CD4+ T cells and NK cells in the effector phase. Moreover, the involvement of CD28/CTLA4 costimulation pathway and IFN-{gamma} are also necessary. When 3LL tumor-bearing mice were treated with 1 x 104 Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC, their pulmonary metastases were significantly reduced, whereas the same low dose of Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC had no obvious therapeutic effects. Our data suggest that Lptn-DC are more potent adjuvants for peptide delivery to induce protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Dendritic cells (DC)4 are the uniquely potent APCs involved in the initiation of immune responses (1). With the development of the methods for propagating DC on a large scale from hemopoietic precursors (2, 3, 4), vaccination with tumor Ag-loaded DC represents a potentially powerful strategy to induce tumor rejection (5, 6). Up to now, most investigations about DC-based vaccines have focused on exploring feasible and effective approaches to loading tumor Ag onto DC for vaccination. Actually, various approaches have been evaluated, including pulsing DC with tumor Ag in the form of protein (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14) or peptide (15, 16, 17, 18, 19), transducing cDNA encoding tumor Ag (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28) or tumor RNA (11, 29) into DC, and fusing tumor cells (30) with DC. It has been well documented that vaccination with tumor Ag-loaded DC is capable of eliciting protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity in animal models and clinical trials (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30).

As adjuvants for Ag delivery, DC pick up Ags in the periphery and carry them to T cell area in lymphoid organs to prime the immune responses (31, 32, 33, 34, 35). The precise molecular mechanisms underlying DC in vivo migration and their interaction with T cells are not well defined. Chemokines capable of regulating the migration of immune cells may contribute to the initiation of immune responses by DC. It is evident that DC express some chemokine receptors, so chemokines participate in the migration and recruitment of DC (36, 37, 38, 39). Moreover, DC can produce several kinds of chemokines (40, 41, 42, 43) (e.g., macrophage-inflammatory protein-{gamma} (MIP-{gamma}), monocyte chemotactic protein, RANTES, MIP-1{alpha}, and DC-CK1) to actively attract T cells to initiate immune responses. Lymphotactin (Lptn) is a recently defined C chemokine that is specifically attractive to T cells (44, 45, 46). Cotransfection of Lptn and IL-2 genes into tumor tissue could induce potent antitumor immunity (47). We hypothesized that the improved preferential chemotaxis of DC on T cells by genetically modifying DC with T cell-attracting chemokine might be capable of facilitating the in vivo stimulation of T cells by DC and consequently favoring DC Ag presentation and T cell activation.

Recently, different gene transfer approaches have been explored to genetically modify DC for vaccination, and it has been found that DC genetically modified with tumor Ags or immunoregulatory cytokines are potentially advantageous in inducing antitumor immunity (12, 13, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30). Adenovirus (Ad) vector capable of mediating gene transfer with high efficiency and acting as adjuvants to boost CTL response were demonstrated to be the potentially promising viral vector for DC genetic modification (12, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30). One of our previous studies showed that granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF) gene-modified DC pulsed with tumor Ag could induce antitumor immunity more potently (12).

The primary aim of this study is to improve the efficacy of DC-based vaccines for cancer treatment by genetically modifying DC with a T cell-attracting chemokine. So in this study, replication-defective Ad vector harboring mouse Lptn was constructed and used to genetically modify mouse bone marrow DC. In the tumor model of 3LL Lewis lung carcinoma, normal mice were vaccinated with the Lptn gene-modified DC (Lptn-DC) pulsed with 3LL cell-specific Mut1 peptide (FEQNTAQP) (48), and the protective and therapeutic effects were investigated.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell lines and animals

293 (CRL1573; American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA)) is a human embryonic kidney cell line transformed with Ad5 E1A and E1B genes and supporting propagation of E1-deleted recombinant Ads. 3LL is a murine Lewis lung carcinoma cell line derived from C57BL/6 mice (H-2Kb). The above cell lines were cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (HyClone, Logan, UT), 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. The B16.F10 melanoma cell line was cultured in complete RPMI 1640. Female C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice, 5–6 wk old, were purchased from Joint Ventures Sipper BK Experimental Animal Co. (Shanghai, People’s Republic of China).

Peptides

Peptides with a purity of >95% were synthesized by an automatic solid-phase peptide synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) by Cybersyn Co. (Lenni, PA) and purified by reversed-phase HPLC. The Mut1 peptide FEQNTAQP consists of the 52–59 amino acid positions of the mutated connexin 37 protein expressed in the 3LL cell line (48). The sequence of OVA257–264 peptide is SIINFEKL (49). Peptides were dissolved in serum-free Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium/50 mM 2-ME and stored at -20°C.

Recombinant Ads

Recombinant Ad vector harboring LacZ reporter gene has been described previously (50). Lptn cDNA was obtained from the activated splenic T cells by RT-PCR. Briefly, mouse splenic T lymphocytes were enriched by passing through a nylon wool column and stimulated with PMA and A23187 at the final concentrations of 0.9 and 200 ng/ml, respectively, for 4 h. Lptn cDNA was cloned from the activated T cells by RT-PCR using mouse Lptn-specific primer ends modified to include EcoRI and BamHI sites at 5' and 3' termini, respectively (44), and confirmed by automatic sequencer (ABI377). The recombinant Ads harboring mouse Lptn or LacZ gene were generated by the method of cosmid/terminal peptide complex homologous recombination previously described elsewhere (51). Lptn cDNA was placed under the control of CMV promoter in the modified pCI expression vector (Promega, Madison, WI). Subsequently, the expression cassette was inserted into the ClaI cloning site of cosmid vector pAdex1cw (kindly provided by I. Saito, Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan), which bears an Ad5 genome spanning 0–99.3 map units with deletions of E1A, E1B, and E3. The resultant recombinant cosmid was cotransfected into 293 cells with EcoT22I-digested Ad5 DNA-terminal peptide complex by calcium phosphate precipitation, and the recombinant Ads were generated by homologous recombination (51). The incorporation of the expression cassette was confirmed by digestion with appropriate restriction enzymes. Subsequently, the recombinant viruses were propagated in 293 cells and purified on CsCl density gradient, the titers of which were determined by plaque assay on the 293 cells. The Ad solutions were stored at -80°C. The DNA structure of Lptn recombinant Ad is shown in Fig. 1Go.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Construction of LacZ and mouse Lptn recombinant Ad vectors. A replication-defective Ad vector with E1 and E3 regions deleted was used to construct recombinant Ad vectors. Ad.LacZ, Ad bearing the LacZ gene driven by the CAG promoter; Ad.Lptn, Ad harboring mouse Lptn gene driven by the CMV promoter; CAG, a chimeric gene composed of a CMV immediate early enhancer and a modified chicken ß-actin promoter.

 
Generation of DC from bone marrow cultures

The procedure used in this study was previously described by Porgador and Gilboa (15), with some minor modifications. Briefly, bone marrow cells from C57BL/6 mice were depleted of red blood cells with ammonium chloride and depleted of lymphocytes, granulocytes, and Ia+ cells using a mixture of mAbs and rabbit complement. The mAbs were 2.43 (anti-CD8), GK1.5 (anti-CD4), RA3–3A1/6.1 (anti-B220/CD45R), B21-2 (anti-Ia), and 2.4G2 (anti-FcRII; tumor immunology bank 210, 207, 146, 229, and HB197; ATCC). Cells were plated in six-well culture plates (106 cells/ml, 3 ml/well) in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 50 µM 2-ME, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 3.3 ng/ml recombinant murine GM-CSF (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). At day 3 of culture, floating cells were gently removed and fresh medium was added. At day 7 of culture, nonadherent and loosely adherent cells were collected and replated in a six-well culture plate (106 cells/ml, 3 ml/well). At 9 or 10 days of culture, nonadherent cells (DC) were harvested for identification and genetic modification.

Gene modification and peptide pulsing of DC

DC (1~2 x 106) were washed twice with HBSS and resuspended in 100~ 200 µl serum-free RPMI 1640 with LacZ or Lptn recombinant Ad with a multiplicity of infection of 100. After 1 h of incubation at 37°C (with gentle agitation every 20 min), the cells were washed with HBSS and resuspended in 1 ml of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS (1 x 106/ml). Twenty-four hours after gene modification, LacZ gene-modified DC (LacZ-DC) were collected for X-Gal staining to evaluate gene transfer efficiency, and the culture supernatants from DC or gene-modified DC were harvested for chemotaxis assay of Lptn. In addition, RT-PCR was also performed on gene-modified DC to analyze Lptn expression. Before PCR amplification, the reverse transcripts were digested with RNase-free DNase to degrade the potentially contaminated DNA templates. The upstream primer of mouse ß-actin was 5'-TGGAATCCTGTGGCATCCATGAAAC3-', and the downstream primer was 5'-TAAAACGCAGCTCAGTAACAGTCCG-3', with an expected size of 359 bp. The specific upstream primer for mouse Lptn was 5'-TGGGGACTGAAGTCCTAGAAG-3', and the downstream primer was 5'-TTACC CAGTCAGGGTTACTGCTGTG-3', with the product size of 300 bp. For peptide pulsing, 1~2 x 106 DC cultured overnight after gene transfection were washed with Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium/50 mM 2-ME and resuspended in 0.8 ml of the same medium containing 100 µg of peptide. After 3 h incubation at 37°C (with gentle shaking every 30 min), the peptide-pulsed DC were irradiated (5000 rad), washed twice with HBSS, and resuspended in HBSS for injection.

In vitro microchemotaxis assay

The microchemotaxis assay was conducted using a modified 48-well Boyden chamber migration assay (52). Duplicate wells of the lower half of the microchemotaxis chamber (NeuroProbe, Cabin John, MD) were filled with the appropriate dilutions of DC supernatants or standard human Lptn (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), and the upper chambers of the assembly were filled with 40 µl of the appropriate cell suspension (2 x 106 cells/ml). CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were negatively selected from splenocytes of C57BL/6 mice using the mixtures (RA3–3A1/6.1 (anti-B220/CD45R), B21-2 (anti-Ia), PK136 (anti-NK), 2.4G2 (anti-FcRII), and 2.43 (anti-CD8) or GK1.5 (anti-CD4)) and complement. Data were obtained by counting five nonoverlapping high power microscope fields from each well. Cells were considered to be chemoattracted if the chemotactic index (number of cells migrating in experimental well/number of cells migrating in medium only) was >2.

Immunization and tumor challenge

Peptide-pulsed DC (1 x 104 or 1 x 105) in 0.2 ml HBSS were injected s.c. into both thighs of normal C57BL/6 mice. One week after vaccination with peptide-pulsed DC with or without genetic modification, the mice were injected s.c. in the flank of the abdomen with a lethal dose of 5 x 105 3LL Lewis lung carcinoma cells. To evaluate the specificity of the antitumor immunity induced by Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC or Lptn-DC, the immunized mice were also challenged with B16 tumor cells. The tumor size was monitored at regular intervals and calculated as the product of the maximal perpendicular diameters. Mice were killed when the challenged tumors reached 3 cm in diameter or severe ulceration developed. All experiments were performed three times using individual treatment groups of six mice. Data are representative of three experiments performed.

Immunotherapy of preestablished 3LL carcinoma model

The spontaneous metastasis model of 3LL lung carcinoma was established by inoculating 3LL tumor cells (2 x 105/mouse) into the footpad (53). Eighteen days later, tumor-bearing legs were amputated when the tumor size in the footpad reached 7~8 mm in diameter. Postsurgical mortality was <2%. Two days after amputation, mice were vaccinated twice s.c. with 1 x 105 or 1 x 104 peptide-pulsed DC at weekly intervals. Mice were killed when HBSS-treated mice died 30–35 days postamputation. Metastatic loads were recorded with lung weights.

Cytotoxicity assay

One week after immunization, the immunized mice were killed, and their splenic lymphocytes (2 x 106 cells/ml) were restimulated in vitro with 50 U/ml IFN-{gamma}-pretreated and irradiated (5000 rad) 3LL cells (2 x 105 cells/ml) in six-well culture plates (4 ml/well). The culture medium consisted of RPMI 1640 and NCTC109 (1/1, v/v) supplemented with 10% FCS, 50 mM 2-ME, 2 mM glutamine, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. After 5 days of restimulation, the viable lymphocytes were collected and cultured with 2 x 10451Cr-labeled 3LL or B16 target cells in a round-bottom 96-well microtiter plate (Nunclon, Naperville, IL) in triplicate at different E:T ratios. After incubation at 37°C for 4 h, 100 µl of supernatants were harvested, and their radioactivity was measured by a gamma counter (model 1275, Wallac, Turku, Finland). The percentages of specific 51Cr release were calculated according to the following formula: % 51Cr release = 100 x [(cpm experiment - cpm spontaneous release)/(cpm maximum - cpm spontaneous release)], where the spontaneous release was obtained from target cells cultured with medium alone, and the maximum release was obtained from target cells cultured with 0.1% NP40 instead of effector cells. The spontaneous release was <15%.

In vivo depletion of immune cell subsets and immunoregulatory molecules

Mice were immunized once with 1 x 105 Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC and challenged with 5 x 105 3LL tumor cells 11 days after immunization. Four days before DC immunization or tumor challenge, the mice started to receive a total of five i.p. injections of the ascites (0.1 ml/mouse/injection) from hybridoma-bearing mice at the intervals of 3 days. The mAbs used were GK1.5 (anti-CD4), 2.43 (anti-CD8), PK136 (anti-NK; ATCC HB191), and R4-6A2 (anti-IFN-{gamma}; ATCC HB170) mAbs. Normal rat IgG (Sigma) was given as mock control. Depletion of T cell subsets and NK cells was monitored by flow cytometry, which showed >90% specific depletion in splenocytes. To block the CD28/CTLA4 pathway of T costimulation, peptide-pulsed DC (1 x 106 cells/ml) were pretreated with 50 µg of CTLA-Ig in the volume of 1 ml at 4°C for 45 min before being coinjected into mice. CTLA-Ig is a chimeric fusion protein comprising the extracellular domain of CTLA4 Ag and the Fc fragment of human IgG. CTLA-Ig fusion cDNA was inserted into the pCAAGS expression vector (kindly provided by I. Saito, Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan) under the control of CMV promoter and was subsequently transduced into the P3U1 myeoloma cell line. The CTLA-Ig was purified from its culture supernatant with a protein A affinity column (Pharmacia).

Statistical analyses

Data are presented as mean value ± SD. Student’s t test was used for comparison of two groups. p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ad-mediated Lptn gene modification of DC

Bone marrow DC from C57BL/6 mice were expanded in vitro for 9–10 days, followed by characterization using composite criteria of typical morphology, cell surface markers, and MLR. DC comprised >90% of the nonadherent cells present 9–10 days after bone marrow culture. Surface phenotype analysis by flow cytometry showed that bone marrow DC expressed high levels of MHC-I, MHC-II, CD40, and CD80 and moderate levels of DC-specific Ag DEC205 (data not shown). MLR revealed that bone marrow DC were potent stimulators in allogenic MLR (data not shown). The genetic modification of DC was mediated by Ad vector. The DNA structure of Lptn Ad vector (Ad.Lptn) is demonstrated in Fig. 1Go. The recombinant Ad vector of LacZ was previously described (50). Using LacZ as a reporter gene, we evaluated the DC gene transfer efficiency mediated by Ad vector. Twenty-four hours after infection of day 9 DC with LacZ recombinant Ads at a multiplicity of infection of 100, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside staining showed that gene transfer efficiency was >95% (data not shown), which confirms that Ad vector can efficiently mediate gene transfer into DC. Chemotaxis assay revealed that the culture supernatants from DC or LacZ-DC had no significant chemotactic activity on CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, but the 24-h culture supernatants from DC transfected with Ad.Lptn (Fig. 1Go) could attract both CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells markedly (Fig. 2Go). This indicates that Lptn Ad vector can mediate the expression of bioactive Lptn in DC. Lptn expression in Lptn-DC was further confirmed by RT-PCR analysis. Before PCR, the reverse transcripts were digested with RNase-free DNase I to degrade the potentially contaminated DNA templates; RNA samples without reverse transcription were directly subjected to PCR as control. As shown in Fig. 2Go, neither DC nor LacZ-DC expressed any detectable Lptn by RT-PCR, whereas Lptn mRNA expression was detected 4 h after gene modification of day 9 DC with Ad.Lptn. In addition, neither LacZ nor Lptn gene transfer into DC by their replication-defective Ad vectors changed their phenotype obviously.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Lptn expression of DC transfected with Lptn gene. A, The 24-h supernatants from Lptn-transfected DC are obviously chemotactic to CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. After Ad-mediated gene transfection of day 9 bone marrow DC, the 24-h supernatants of gene-transfected DC were analyzed for their chemotaxis to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (as detailed in Materials and Methods). Data are representative of five different experiments. B, RT-PCR analysis for Lptn expression. Four hours after Ad-mediated gene transfection of day 9 bone marrow DC (as described in Materials and Methods), the gene-transfected DC were harvested and subjected to extraction of total cellular RNA. After reverse transcription, the transcripts were digested with DNase-free RNase to degrade potentially contaminated DNA templates before proceeding to PCR amplification with ß-actin or Lptn-specific primers. Electrophoreses with 2% agarose gel were performed for the PCR products. Data are representative of five different experiments.

 
Lptn-DC pulsed with Mut1 peptide induce potent specific CTL cytotoxicity

One of our primary aims was to determine whether vaccination of Lptn-DC pulsed with tumor peptide could induce peptide-specific CTL response more effectively. Accordingly, Lptn-DC were pulsed with peptide (Mut1 or OVA) and injected s.c. into mice at a dose of 1 x 104 or 1 x 105 cells/mouse. The CTL were determined after 5 days of in vitro restimulation with 3LL tumor cells. Mut1 is an H-2Kb-restricted Ag peptide of 3LL carcinoma cells. H-2Kb OVA peptide was used as an irrelevant peptide control in this study. Although immunization with a single dose of 1 x 105 Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC or Mut1 peptide-pulsed LacZ-DC induced CTL response specifically against 3LL cells, these cells were less potent CTL inducers than were Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC (Fig. 3Go). Immunization with a lower dose of Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC or Mut1 peptide-pulsed LacZ-DC (1 x 104) induced poor CTL response, but the same low-dose Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC did induce higher CTL activity specifically against 3LL tumor cells, which was comparable with that induced by vaccination with 10-fold peptide-pulsed DC. On the other hand, immunization of Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC or Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC induced poor CTL activity against B16 cells (data not shown), and immunization with OVA peptide-pulsed DC or OVA peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC induced no significant CTL response against 3LL cells. This implies that Lptn-DC are more potent to deliver peptide to induce specific CTL in vivo.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Immunization with Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC induces potent CTL activity against Mut1-expressing 3LL tumor cells. Normal C57BL/6 mice were immunized s.c. with a single dose of 1 x 105 (A) or 1 x 104 (B) peptide-pulsed DC or gene-transfected DC or HBSS. One week after immunization, their splenocytes were restimulated in vitro for 5 days with IFN-{gamma}-pretreated and irradiated (5000 rad) 3LL cells and assayed for their cytotoxicity against 51Cr-labeled 3LL or B16 target cells (not shown). Data are representative of three different experiments (eight mice per group). Their cytolytic activity against B16 tumor cells was <5%.

 
Lptn-DC pulsed with Mut1 peptide induce protective antitumor immunity

Then, we tested whether vaccination of mice with Lptn-DC pulsed with tumor peptide was capable of inducing protective immunity against tumor challenge more potently. Seven days after a single vaccination of DC, the vaccinated mice were challenged s.c. with 5 x 105 3LL or B16 tumor cells. Consistent with the CTL response, vaccination with 1 x 105 Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC could provide protection specifically against 3LL tumor challenge, but less effectively than the vaccination with Lptn-DC counterpart. Vaccination with a low dose (1 x 104) of Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC could not protect the immunized mice from 3LL tumor challenge, and tumors grew in all mice. But all the mice immunized with 1 x 104 Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC were free of tumor 20 days after 3LL tumor challenge (Fig. 4Go), and 83.3% of mice were free of tumor 90 days after tumor challenge in three different experiments. Immunization of Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC or Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC induced poor protection against B16 cells (data not shown), and immunization with OVA peptide-pulsed DC or OVA peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC failed to elicit any protective immunity against 3LL tumor challenge.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Immunization with 1 x 105 (A) or 1 x 104 (B) Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC induces potent protective immunity to lethal 3LL tumor challenge. Normal C57BL/6 mice were immunized s.c. with HBSS, Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC, LacZ-DC pulsed with Mut1 peptide, Lptn-DC pulsed with Mut1 peptide, or Lptn-DC pulsed with OVA peptide. DC were administered at a single dose of 1 x 105 (A) or 1 x 104 (B). One week after immunization, the mice were injected s.c. with a lethal dose of 5 x 105 3LL Lewis lung carcinoma cells. Tumor size was monitored at regular intervals and calculated as the product of maximal perpendicular diameters. Tumor measurements were made 20 days after tumor challenge. Columns represent mean tumor diameters, and dots represent individual tumor diameters (six mice per group). Data are representative of three experiments performed. Mice were killed when challenge tumors reached 3 cm in diameter or severe ulceration developed.

 
In vivo depletion analysis

To investigate the potential roles of T cell subpopulations and NK cells in the induction of protective immunity by Lptn-DC pulsed with MHC-I-restricted peptide, mice were depleted of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells or NK cells during immunization or during challenge. As shown in Fig. 5Go, depletion of CD8+ T cells during immunization or during challenge abrogated the protective immunity induced by peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC. Mice depleted of CD4+ T cells during immunization failed to reject tumor challenge. However, the mice could reject tumor challenge when CD4+ T cells were depleted during challenge. These results are consistent with the report by Porgador and Gilboa (15), in which they found that CD8+ T cells were the predominant effector cells in the MHC-I-restricted peptide-induced antitumor immunity and that CD4+ T cells were required for the induction of CD8+-dependent T cell immunity but were unnecessary in the effector phase. Although Lptn was recently reported to be capable of attracting NK cells besides T cells (25), mice depleted of NK cells during immunization or during challenge were protected from tumor challenge, suggesting that interaction with T cells and subsequent activation of T cells are responsible for the antitumor immunity induced by peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC. To evaluate the potential role of T cell costimulation in peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC-induced immune response, the CD28/CTLA4 costimulation pathway was functionally blocked by the chimeric fusion protein CTLA-Ig. The results showed that blockade of the CD28/CTLA4 pathway during immunization abrogated the protective immunity completely. IFN-{gamma} is regarded as an important Th1-associated cytokine and plays an important role in the induction of Th1-mediated immunity. Consistent with this notion, blockage of IFN-{gamma} during immunization or during challenge abrogated protective immunity induced by peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Involvement of T cell subsets, NK cells, CD28/CTLA4 costimulation, and IFN-{gamma} in the induction phase (A) or effector phase (B) of the protective immunity induced by Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC. C57BL/6 mice were depleted of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, or NK cells or blocked with an IFN-{gamma} or CD28/CTLA4 costimulation pathway during immunization with Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC or during tumor challenge. Mice were immunized once with 1 x 105 Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC and challenged with 5 x 105 3LL tumor cells 11 days after immunization. Four days before DC immunization (A) or tumor challenge (B), the mice started to receive a total of five i.p. injections of 0.1 ml/mouse/injection ascites from hybridoma-bearing mice at the intervals of 3 days. The Abs used were GK1.5 (anti-CD4), 2.43 (anti-CD8), PK136 (anti-NK), and R4-6A2 (anti-IFN-{gamma}) mAbs. Normal rat IgG was given as control Ab. Depletion of T cell subsets and NK cells was monitored by flow cytometry, which showed >90% specific depletion in splenocytes. To block the CD28/CTLA4 pathway of T costimulation, 50 µg of CTLA-Ig was admixed with peptide-pulsed DC and coinjected into mice. Tumor measurements were made 20 days after tumor challenge. Columns represent mean tumor diameters, and dots represent individual tumor diameters (six mice per group). Data are representative of three different experiments performed.

 
Lptn-DC pulsed with Mut1 peptide induce therapeutic antitumor immunity

To be more stringent and clinically relevant, the therapeutic effects of vaccination with Lptn-DC pulsed with tumor-associated peptide were further evaluated in the treatment of mice with the preestablished 3LL metastasis model. The 3LL tumor cell line is poorly immunogenic and highly metastatic. The spontaneous metastasis model of 3LL was established by injection of 2 x 105 3LL tumor cells into the footpad. The average lung weight of a normal mouse was 190~210 mg. Thirty to thirty-five days after amputation, the mean lung weight of the HBSS-treated control group was about 600 mg. As shown in Fig. 6Go, vaccination with 1 x 105 Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC or Mut1 peptide-pulsed LacZ-DC could slightly reduce lung metastases (with the mean lung weights of 436 and 402 mg, respectively), but less effectively than the Lptn-DC counterpart (256 mg in mean lung weight). The therapeutic effects of Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC or Mut1 peptide-pulsed LacZ-DC disappeared when the DC dose was reduced to 1 x 104, but the same dose of Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC could still inhibit pulmonary metastases markedly, yielding a mean lung weight of 312 mg. The survival time of the mice treated with Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC was also greatly extended, much more effectively than with the mock control (data not shown), whereas vaccination with Mut1 peptide-pulsed DC or Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC could not inhibit B16 pulmonary metastasis (data not shown), and OVA peptide-pulsed DC or OVA peptide-pulsed DC Lptn-DC did not exhibit any therapeutic effects on 3LL pulmonary metastases. These findings suggest that peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC can induce specific therapeutic antitumor immunity more potently.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Regression of lung metastases in mice treated with Mut1 peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC. 3LL tumor cells were inoculated into the footpads of normal mice (2 x 105 cells/mouse). When local tumors in the footpads reached 7–8 mm in diameter, amputation was performed on the tumor-bearing mice. Two days after amputation, mice were vaccinated twice s.c. with 1 x 105 (open column) or 1 x 104 (solid column) peptide-pulsed DC at weekly intervals. The control mice were not immunized. Mice were killed when control groups died 30–35 days after amputation, and metastatic loads were recorded with lung weights. Columns represent mean lung weight, and dots represent individual lung weights (six mice per group). The results are representative of three different experiments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Vaccination with DC pulsed with tumor Ag is well documented to be capable of inducing Ag-specific CTL response, protecting immunized animals against tumor challenge, and resulting in regression of preestablished tumors, which has led to related clinical trials (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). Tumor Ag recognized by tumor-specific CTL are being defined for several human tumors (54, 55). Vaccination with tumor Ag-pulsed DC seems to be an attractive approach for cancer immunotherapy (5, 6). In the present study, we demonstrate that Lptn-DC pulsed with Mut1 tumor peptide are more potent to induce specific antitumor immunity, since they can induce specific CTL more potently than their counterparts of untransfected or LacZ gene-transfected DC and can protect the immunized mice from tumor challenge and reduce preestablished tumor metastasis more effectively.

It is evident that chemokine can regulate the migration of T cells as well as DC; thus, chemokine may play potentially regulatory roles in the priming of T cell immunity by DC. Recent investigations demonstrated that DC could express chemokine receptors (e.g., CCR1, CCR2, CCR5, CCR6, CXCR1, CXCR2, and CXCR4) and respond to chemokines to migrate directionally (36, 37, 38, 39). In a more active manner, DC can attract T cells by secreting several chemokines (e.g., MIP-{gamma}, monocyte chemotactic protein, RANTES, and MIP-1{alpha}) (40, 41, 42). More interestingly, a CC chemokine named DC-CK1 was cloned recently from human DC, which can preferentially attract human naive T cells (43). Although the murine analogue of DC-CK1 has not been defined, this suggests that chemoattraction between DC and T cells would favor DC Ag presentation to prime T cell immunity. In our study, Lptn-DC were found to be capable of attracting T cells more efficiently without any obvious changes of cell phenotypes. The culture supernatants from normal DC or LacZ-DC have no significant chemotactic activity on T cells, which implies that the autocrine of chemokine by DC may be very low and under the threshold of chemotaxis assay. Nevertheless, the supernatants from Lptn-DC can attract CD4+ and CD8+ T cells markedly, which indicates that Lptn gene modification of DC can improve their preferential chemotaxis on T cells and consequently may optimize the microenviroment of Ag presentation and favor DC Ag presenting to T cells. Although Lptn is also capable of attracting NK cells (46), in vivo depletion of NK cells during immunization did not abrogate the protective immunity induced by peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC.

Consistent with previous reports about peptide-pulsed DC (15), both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are necessary for the induction of MHC-I-restricted peptide immunity by Lptn-DC, and only CD8+ T cells are required in the effector phase. In addition, T cell costimulation and IFN-{gamma} are also found to be required for the induction of T cell immunity by peptide-pulsed Lptn-DC. The above data supported our hypothesis that Lptn autocrine by DC in the local microenviroment enables them to preferentially attract T cells more efficiently, favors DC Ag presentation, and, hence, improves the efficacy of DC-based vaccines. Whether Lptn autocrine by Lptn-DC affects their in vivo migration and tissue localization is under further investigation.

Genetic modification of DC is receiving much attention in DC-based vaccines. Different viral vectors, including retroviral vector (20, 21, 22, 23, 24), Ad vector (25, 26, 27, 28), and vaccinia vector (26), have been evaluated to genetically modify DC. By coculture with retrovirus-producing packaging cells or repeated rounds of infection, mouse and human DC could be transduced with reporter genes (e.g., ß-galactosidase, CD2, and LNGFR) and human tumor-associated Ag genes (e.g., mucin and MART-1), but the gene transfer efficiency is relatively low (20–75%) compared with that mediated by Ad vector. In addition, the former protocol is not compatible with the current guideline about the clinical use of retroviral vector. Ad vector could mediate gene transfer into DC with high efficiency (>95%). In animal models, a single vaccination with 1–3 x 105 DC genetically modified with Ad vector harboring cDNA for model Ags (e.g., ß-galactosidase and OVA) have been documented to be capable of inducing protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity (25, 26). In our previous studies (12), mouse DC were transduced with GM-CSF Ad vector, and it was found that GM-CSF gene-modified DC acquired more potent costimulatory activity and could induce protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity against B16 melanoma after they were pulsed with tumor Ag. Although Ad vector is highly immunogenic, it is reported that repeated injections of Ad-infected DC induced only low titers of neutralizing Abs, and that the presence of neutralizing Abs specific for Ad did not affect the usefulness of infected DC to boost CTL response by repeated applications (26). Thus, Ad vector seems to be a promising tool to be used to genetically modify DC for vaccination. Besides viral vectors, nonviral methods were used to transduce DC, including lipofectin, calcium phosphate precipitation, and electroporation, but none of them yielded efficient gene transfer compared with Ad vector (27).

Our finding that a low dose of Lptn-DC (1 x 104) pulsed with tumor Ag peptide can exhibit a marked therapeutic effect on a preestablished tumor reduces the conventional dose of DC at least 10 times. Moreover, immunization with low-dose DC facilitates a reduction of the risk of autoimmune diseases related with DC-based vaccines. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that the improved chemotaxis of DC on T cells via genetic modification of DC with chemokine can increase the efficacy of DC-based vaccines. This study also provides an applicable approach to utilizing chemokines in the immunologic intervention.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (39730420). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Xuetao Cao, Department of Immunology, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai 200433, People’s Republic of China. E-mail address: Back

3 X.C. and W.Z. contributed equally to this work. Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; Ad, adenovirus; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; Lptn, lymphotactin; Lptn-DC, Lptn gene-modified DC; LacZ-DC, LacZ gene-modified DC; CTLA, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein; MIP-{gamma}, macrophage-inflammatory protein-{gamma}. Back

Received for publication May 21, 1998. Accepted for publication August 10, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Steinman, R. M.. 1991. The dendritic cells system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9:271.[Medline]
  2. Inaba, K., M. Inaba, N. Romani, H. Aya, M. Deguchi, S. Ikehara, S. Muramatsu, R. M. Steinman. 1992. Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Exp. Med. 176:1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Caux, C., C. Dezutter-Dambuyant, D. Schmitt, J. Banchereau. 1992. GM-CSF and TNF-{alpha} cooperate in the generation of dendritic Langerhans cells. Nature 360:258.[Medline]
  4. Romani, N., S. Gruner, D. Brang, E. Kampgen, A. Lenz, B. Trockenbacher, G. Konwalinka, P. O. Fritsch, R. M. Steinman, G. Schuler. 1994. Proliferating dendritic cell progenitors in human blood. J. Exp. Med. 180:83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Young, J. W., K. Inaba. 1996. Dendritic cells as adjuvants for class I major histocompatibility complex-restricted antitumor immunity. J. Exp. Med. 183:7.[Free Full Text]
  6. Girolomoni, G., P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli. 1997. Dendritic cells hold promise for immunotherapy. Immunol. Today 18:102.[Medline]
  7. Flamand, V., T. Sornasse, K. Thielemans, C. Demnet, M. Bakkus, H. Bazin, F. Tielemans, O. Leo, J. Urbain, M. Moser. 1994. Murine dendritic cells pulsed in vitro with tumor antigen induce tumor resistance in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:605.[Medline]
  8. Porgador, A., D. Snyder, E. Gilboa. 1996. Induction of antitumor immunity using bone marrow-generated dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 156:2918.[Abstract]
  9. Paglia, P., M. Chiodoni, M. Rodolfo, M. P. Colombo. 1996. Murine dendritic cells loaded in vitro with soluble protein prime cytotoxic T lymphocytes against tumor antigen in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 283:317.
  10. Zitvogel, L., J. Mayordomo, T. Tjandrawan, A. Deleo, M. Clarke, M. Lotze, W. J. Storkus. 1996. Therapy of murine tumors with tumor peptide-pulsed dendritic cells: dependence on T cells, B7 costimulation, and T helper cell 1-associated cytokines. J. Exp. Med. 183:87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ashley, D. M., B. Faiola, S. Nair, L. P. Hale, D. D. Bigner, E. Gilboa. 1997. Bone marrow-generated dendritic cells pulsed with tumor extracts or tumor RNA induce antitumor immunity against central nervous system tumors. J. Exp. Med. 186:1177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Cao, X., W. Zhang, X. Huang, J. Wang. 1997. Enhanced antitumor effects of tumor antigen-pulsed dendritic cells by their transfection with GM-CSF. Sci. China Ser. C 40:539.
  13. Zitvogel, L., B. Couderc, J. I. Mayordomo, P. D. Robbins, M. T. Lotze, W. J. Storkus. 1996. IL-12-engineered dendritic cells serve as effective tumor vaccine adjuvants in vivo. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 795:284.[Medline]
  14. Hsu Frank F. J. J., C. Benike, F. Fagnoni, T. Liles, D. Czerwinski, B. Taidi, E. G. Engleman, and R. Levy. 1996. Vaccination of patients with B-cell lymphoma using autologous antigen-pulsed antigen-pulsed dendritic cells. Nat. Med. 2:52.
  15. Porgador, A., E. Gilboa. 1995. Bone marrow-generated dendritic cells pulsed with a class I-restricted peptide are potent inducers of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 182:255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Mayordomo, J., T. Zorina, W. J. Storkus, L. Zitvogel, C. Celluzzi, L. Falo, C. Melief, S. Ildstad, W. M. Kast, A. B. Deleo, M. Lotze. 1995. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells pulsed with synthetic tumor peptides elicit protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity. Nat. Med. 1:1297.[Medline]
  17. Ossevoort, M. A., M. Feltkamp, K. van Veen, C. Melief, W. Kast. 1995. Dendritic cells as carriers for a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope-based peptide vaccine in protection against a human papillomavirus type 16-induced tumor. J. Immunother. 18:86.[Medline]
  18. Celluzzi, C., J. I. Mayordomo, W. J. Storkus, M. T. Lotze, J. L. D. Falo. 1996. Peptide-pulsed dendritic cells induce antigen-specific, CTL-mediated protective tumor immunity. J. Exp. Med. 183:283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Bakker, A., G. Marland, A. J. de Boer, R. J. Huijbens, E. H. Danen, G. J. Adema. 1995. Generation of anti-melanoma cytotoxic T lymphocytes from healthy donors after presentation of melanoma-associated antigen-derived epitopes by dendritic cells in vitro. Cancer Res. 55:5330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Reeves, M., R. Royal, J. Lam, S. A. Rosenberg, P. Hwu. 1996. Retroviral transduction of human dendritic cells with a tumor-associated antigen gene. Cancer Res. 56:5672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bello-Fernandez, C., M. Matyash, H. Strobl, W. F. Pickl, O. Majdic, S. D. Lyman, W. Knapp. 1997. Efficient retrovirus-mediated gene transfer of dendritic cells generated from CD34+ cord blood cells under serum-free conditions. Hum. Gene Ther. 8:1651.[Medline]
  22. Szabolcs, P., H. F. Gallardo, D. H. Clocon, M. Sadelain, J. W. Young. 1997. Retrovirally transduced human dendritic cells express a normal phenotype and potent T-cell stimulatory capacity. Blood 151:2160.
  23. Aicher, A., J. Westermann, S. Cayeux, G. Willimsky, K. Daemen, T. Blankenstein, W. Uckert, B. Dorken, A. Pezzutto. 1997. Successful retroviral mediated transduction of a reporter gene in human dendritic cells: feasibility of therapy with gene-modified antigen presenting cells. Exp. Hematol. 25:39.[Medline]
  24. Specht, J. M., G. Wang, M. T. Do, J. S. Lam, R. E. Royal, M. E. Reeves, S. A. Rosenberg, P. Hwu. 1997. Dendritic cells retrovirally transduced with a model antigen gene are therapeutically effective against established pulmonary metastases. J. Exp. Med. 186:1213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Song, W., H. Kong, H. Carpenter, H. Torii, R. Granstein, S. Rafii, M. Moore, R. G. Crystal. 1997. Dendritic cells genetically modified with an adenovirus vector encoding the cDNA for a model antigen induce protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity. J. Exp. Med. 186:1247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Brossart, P., A. W. Goldrath, E. A. Butz, S. Martin, M. J. Bevan. 1997. Virus-mediated delivery of antigenic epitopes into dendritic cells as a means to induce CTL. J. Immunol. 158:3270.[Abstract]
  27. Arthur, J. F., L. H. Butterfield, M. D. Roth, L. A. Bui, S. M. Kiertscher, R. Lau, S. Dubinett, J. Glaspy, W. H. McBride, J. S. Economou. 1997. A comparison of gene transfer methods in human dendritic cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 4:17.[Medline]
  28. Condon, C., S. C. Watkins, C. M. Celluzzi, K. Thompson, L. D. Falo. 1996. DNA-based immunization by in vivo transfection of dendritic cells. Nat. Med. 2:1122.[Medline]
  29. Boczkowski, D., S. Nair, D. Snyder, E. Gilboa. 1996. Dendritic cells pulsed with RNA are potent antigen-presenting cells in vitro and in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 184:465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Gong, J., D. Chen, M. Kashiwaba, D. Kufe. 1997. Induction of antitumor activity by immunization with fusions of dendritic cells and carcinoma cells. Nat. Med. 3:558.[Medline]
  31. Kupiec-Weglinski, J. W., J. M. Austyn, P. J. Morris. 1988. Migration patterns of dendritic cells in the mouse: traffic from the blood, and T cell-dependent and -independent entry to lymphoid tissues. J. Exp. Med. 167:632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Austyn, J. M., J. W. Kupiec-Weglinski, D. F. Hankins, P. J. Morris. 1988. Migration patterns of dendritic cells in the mouse: homing to T cell-dependent areas of spleen, and binding within marginal zone. J. Exp. Med. 167:646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Fossum, S.. 1989. Lymph-borne dendritic leukocytes do not recirculate, but enter the lymph node paracortex to become interdigitating cells. Scand. J. Immunol. 27:97.
  34. Kudo, S., K. Matsuno, T. Ezaki, M. Ogawa. 1997. A novel migration pathway for rat dendritic cells from the blood: hepatic sinusoid-lymph translocation. J. Exp. Med. 185:777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Steinman, R. M., M. Pack, K. Inaba. 1997. Dendritic cells in the T-cell areas of lymphoid organs. Immunol. Rev. 156:25.[Medline]
  36. Xu, L. L., M. Warren, W. Rose, W. Gong, J. Wang. 1996. Human recombinant monocyte chemotactic protein and other C-C chemokines bind and induce directional migration of dendritic cells in vitro. J. Leukocyte Biol. 60:365.[Abstract]
  37. Godiska, R., D. Chantry, C. J. Raport, S. Sozzani, P. Allavena, D. Leviten, A. Mantovani, P. W. Gray. 1997. Human macrophage derived chemokine (MDC), a novel chemoattractant for monocytes, monocyte derived dendritic cells, and natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med. 185:1595.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sozzani, S., W. Luini, A. Borsatti, N. Polentarutti, D. Zhou, L. Piemonti, G. D. Amico, C. A. Power, T. N. C. Wells, M. Gobbi, P. Allavena, A. Mantovani. 1997. Receptor expression and responsiveness of human dendritic cells to a defined set of CC and CXC chemokines. J. Immunol. 159:1993.[Abstract]
  39. Greaves, D. R., W. Wang, D. J. Dairaghi, M. C. Dieu, B. de Saint-Vis, K. Franz-Bacon, D. Rossi, C. Caux, T. McClanahan, S. Gordon, A. Zlotnik, T. J. Schall. 1997. CCR6, a CC chemokine receptor that interacts with macrophage inflammatory protein 3 alpha and is highly expressed in human dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 186:837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Power, C. A., D. J. Church, A. Meyer, S. Alouani, A. E. Proudfoot, I. Clark-Lewis, S. Sozzani, A. Mantovani, T. N. C. Wells. 1997. Cloning and characterization of a specific receptor for the novel CC chemokine MIP-3 alpha from lung dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 186:825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Zhou, L. J., T. F. Tedder. 1995. A distinct pattern of cytokine gene expression by human CD83(+) blood dendritic cells. Blood 86:3295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Mohamdzadeh, M., N. Poltorak, P. Bergstresser, B. Beutler, A. Takashima. 1996. Dendritic cells produce macrophage inflammatory protein-1 {gamma}, a new member of the CC chemokine family. J. Immunol. 156:3102.[Abstract]
  43. Adema, G. J., F. Hartgers, R. Verstraten, E. de Vries, G. Marland, S. Menon, J. Foster, U. Xu, P. Nooyen, T. McClanahan, K. B. Bacon, C. G. Figdor. 1997. A dendritic-cell-derived C-C chemokine that preferentially attracts naïve T cells. Nature 387:713.[Medline]
  44. Kelner, G. S., J. Kennedy, K. B. Bacon, S. Kleyensteuber, D. A. Largaespada, N. A. Jenknis, N. G. Copeland, J. F. Bazan, K. W. Moore, T. J. Schall, A. Zlotnik. 1994. Lymphotactin: a cytokine that represents a new class of chemokine. Science 266:1395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Kennedy, J., G. S. Kelner, S. Kleyensteuber, T. J. Schall, M. C. Weiss, H. Yssel, P. V. Schneider, B. G. Cocks, K. B. Bacon, A. Zlotnik. 1995. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of human lymphotactin. J. Immunol. 155:203.[Abstract]
  46. Hedrick, J., V. Saylor, D. Figueroa, L. Mizoue, Y. Xu, S. Menon, J. Abrams, T. Handel, A. Zlotnik. 1997. Lymphotactin is produced by NK cells and attracts both NK cells and T cells in vivo. J. Immunol. 158:1533.[Abstract]
  47. Dilloo, D., K. Bacon, W. Holeden, W. Zhong, S. Burdach, A. Zlotnik, M. Brenner. 1996. Combined chemokine and cytokine gene transfer enhances antitumor immunity. Nat. Med. 2:1090.[Medline]
  48. Mandelboim, O., G. Berke, M. Fridkin, M. Feldman, M. Eisenstein, L. Eisenbach. 1994. CTL induction by a tumor-associated antigen octapeptide derived from a murine lung carcinoma. Nature 369:67.[Medline]
  49. Rotzschke, O., K. Falk, S. Stevanovic, G. Jung, P. Walden, H. G. Rammensee. 1991. Extract prediction of a natural T cell epitope. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:2891.[Medline]
  50. Lan, K., F. Kanai, Y. Shiratori, S. Okabe, Y. Yoshida, H. Wakimoto, H. Hamada, T. Tanaka, M. Ohashi, M. Omata. 1996. Tumor-specific gene expression in carcinoembryonic antigen-producing gastric cancer cells using adenovirus vectors. Gastroenterology 111:1241.[Medline]
  51. Miyake, S., M. Makimura, Y. Kanegae, S. Harada, Y. Sato, K. Takamori, C. Tokuda, I. Saito. 1996. Efficient generation of recombinant adenoviruses using adenovirus DNA-terminal protein complex and a cosmid bearing the full-length virus genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:1320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Cruikshank, W., J. S. Berman, A. Theodore, J. Bernardo, D. M. Center. 1987. Lymphokine activation of T4+ T lymphocytes and monocytes. J. Immunol. 138:3817.[Abstract]
  53. Mandelboim, O., M. Feldman, L. Eisenbach. 1992. H-2K double transfectants of tumor cells as antimetastatic cellular vaccines in heterozygous recipients: implications for the T cell repertoire. J. Immunol. 148:3666.[Abstract]
  54. Finn, O. J.. 1993. Tumor-rejection antigens recognized by T lymphocytes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 5:701.[Medline]
  55. Boon, T., P. van der Bruggen. 1996. Human tumor antigens recognized by T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 183:725.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Qian, X. Jiang, H. An, Y. Yu, Z. Guo, S. Liu, H. Xu, and X. Cao
TLR agonists promote ERK-mediated preferential IL-10 production of regulatory dendritic cells (diffDCs), leading to NK-cell activation
Blood, October 1, 2006; 108(7): 2307 - 2315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Q. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Wang, G. Ding, W. Zhang, G. Chen, M. Zhang, S. Zheng, and X. Cao
Induction of Allospecific Tolerance by Immature Dendritic Cells Genetically Modified to Express Soluble TNF Receptor
J. Immunol., August 15, 2006; 177(4): 2175 - 2185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Tang, Z. Guo, M. Zhang, J. Wang, G. Chen, and X. Cao
Endothelial stroma programs hematopoietic stem cells to differentiate into regulatory dendritic cells through IL-10
Blood, August 15, 2006; 108(4): 1189 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Dai, T. Wan, B. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Xiu, T. Chen, Y. Wu, and X. Cao
More Efficient Induction of HLA-A*0201-Restricted and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA)-Specific CTL Response by Immunization with Exosomes Prepared from Heat-Stressed CEA-Positive Tumor Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 11(20): 7554 - 7563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Z. Guo, M. Zhang, H. Tang, and X. Cao
Fas signal links innate and adaptive immunity by promoting dendritic-cell secretion of CC and CXC chemokines
Blood, September 15, 2005; 106(6): 2033 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Wu, T. Wan, X. Zhou, B. Wang, F. Yang, N. Li, G. Chen, S. Dai, S. Liu, M. Zhang, et al.
Hsp70-Like Protein 1 Fusion Protein Enhances Induction of Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Specific CD8+ CTL Response by Dendritic Cell Vaccine
Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 65(11): 4947 - 4954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. Wang, H. Chen, X. Jiang, M. Zhang, T. Wan, N. Li, X. Zhou, Y. Wu, F. Yang, Y. Yu, et al.
Identification of an HLA-A*0201-restricted CD8+ T-cell epitope SSp-1 of SARS-CoV spike protein
Blood, July 1, 2004; 104(1): 200 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. Wan, X. Zhou, G. Chen, H. An, T. Chen, W. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Jiang, F. Yang, Y. Wu, et al.
Novel heat shock protein Hsp70L1 activates dendritic cells and acts as a Th1 polarizing adjuvant
Blood, March 1, 2004; 103(5): 1747 - 1754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Matsuyoshi, S. Senju, S. Hirata, Y. Yoshitake, Y. Uemura, and Y. Nishimura
Enhanced Priming of Antigen-Specific CTLs In Vivo by Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Dendritic Cells Expressing Chemokine Along with Antigenic Protein: Application to Antitumor Vaccination
J. Immunol., January 15, 2004; 172(2): 776 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Z. Guo, M. Zhang, H. An, W. Chen, S. Liu, J. Guo, Y. Yu, and X. Cao
Fas ligation induces IL-1{beta}-dependent maturation and IL-1{beta}-independent survival of dendritic cells: different roles of ERK and NF-{kappa}B signaling pathways
Blood, December 15, 2003; 102(13): 4441 - 4447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Stievano, V. Tosello, N. Marcato, A. Rosato, A. Sebelin, L. Chieco-Bianchi, and A. Amadori
CD8+{alpha}{beta}+ T Cells That Lack Surface CD5 Antigen Expression Are a Major Lymphotactin (XCL1) Source in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., November 1, 2003; 171(9): 4528 - 4538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Palena, J. Schlom, and K.-Y. Tsang
Differential Gene Expression Profiles in a Human T-cell Line Stimulated with a Tumor-associated Self-peptide versus an Enhancer Agonist Peptide
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2003; 9(5): 1616 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
P. Middel, P. Thelen, S. Blaschke, F. Polzien, K. Reich, V. Blaschke, A. Wrede, K. M. Hummel, B. Gunawan, and H.-J. Radzun
Expression of the T-Cell Chemoattractant Chemokine Lymphotactin in Crohn's Disease
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2001; 159(5): 1751 - 1761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Ghia, P. Transidico, J. P. Veiga, C. Schaniel, F. Sallusto, K. Matsushima, S. E. Sallan, A. G. Rolink, A. Mantovani, L. M. Nadler, et al.
Chemoattractants MDC and TARC are secreted by malignant B-cell precursors following CD40 ligation and support the migration of leukemia-specific T cells
Blood, August 1, 2001; 98(3): 533 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Liu, Y. Yu, M. Zhang, W. Wang, and X. Cao
The Involvement of TNF-{{alpha}}-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand in the Enhanced Cytotoxicity of IFN-{{beta}}-Stimulated Human Dendritic Cells to Tumor Cells
J. Immunol., May 1, 2001; 166(9): 5407 - 5415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. J. Kirk, D. Hartigan-O’Connor, B. J. Nickoloff, J. S. Chamberlain, M. Giedlin, L. Aukerman, and J. J. Mulé
T Cell-dependent Antitumor Immunity Mediated by Secondary Lymphoid Tissue Chemokine: Augmentation of Dendritic Cell-based Immunotherapy
Cancer Res., March 1, 2001; 61(5): 2062 - 2070.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Cao, W. Zhang, T. Wan, L. He, T. Chen, Z. Yuan, S. Ma, Y. Yu, and G. Chen
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Novel CXC Chemokine Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-2{gamma} Chemoattractant for Human Neutrophils and Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., September 1, 2000; 165(5): 2588 - 2595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Cerdan, E. Serfling, and D. Olive
The C-class chemokine, lymphotactin, impairs the induction of Th1-type lymphokines in human CD4+ T cells
Blood, July 15, 2000; 96(2): 420 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
C. Klein, H. Bueler, and R. C. Mulligan
Comparative Analysis of Genetically Modified Dendritic Cells and Tumor Cells as Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines
J. Exp. Med., May 15, 2000; 191(10): 1699 - 1708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. T. Tan, J. K. Whitmire, K. Murali-Krishna, R. Ahmed, J. D. Altman, R. S. Mittler, A. Sette, T. C. Pearson, and C. P. Larsen
4-1BB Costimulation Is Required for Protective Anti-Viral Immunity After Peptide Vaccination
J. Immunol., March 1, 2000; 164(5): 2320 - 2325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cao, X.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cao, X.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS