The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Behrens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hohlfeld, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Behrens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hohlfeld, R.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 161: 5943-5951.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Human Muscle Cells Express a Functional Costimulatory Molecule Distinct from B7.1 (CD80) and B7.2 (CD86) In Vitro and in Inflammatory Lesions1

Lüder Behrens*, Martin Kerschensteiner*, Thomas Misgeld*, Norbert Goebels*,{dagger}, Hartmut Wekerle* and Reinhard Hohlfeld2,*,{dagger}

* Department of Neuroimmunology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany; and {dagger} Department of Neurology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The B7 family of costimulatory molecules likely includes members distinct from B7.1 (CD80) and B7.2 (CD86). After stimulation with IFN-{gamma} or TNF-{alpha}, human myoblasts selectively express BB-1, but not B7.1 or B7.2. BB-1 is detected by anti-BB-1, a mAb cross-reacting with B7.1 (but not B7.2) and an as yet undefined costimulatory molecule. The absence of B7.1 and B7.2 in BB-1-positive myoblasts was confirmed by RT-PCR. The molecule detected by anti-BB-1 is functional, because anti-BB-1 mAb and CTLA4Ig (but not anti-B7.1- or anti-B7.2-specific mAbs) completely inhibit Ag presentation by cytokine-induced myoblasts to HLA-DR-matched Ag-specific CD4+ T cell lines. Stimulation of myoblasts with IL-4 induces B7.1 and B7.2, as well as BB-1, but with different time kinetics. Stimulation of CD40-positive myoblasts with anti-CD40 mAb selectively induces BB-1, whereas stimulation with CD40L-transfected mouse L cells induces BB-1 and B7.1, with different kinetics. To assess whether BB-1 is expressed in muscle tissue, we investigated 23 muscle biopsy specimens from patients with polymyositis, dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and nonmyopathic controls by immunohistochemistry and confocal laser microscopy. We found that, in all inflammatory myopathy cases, but not in normal muscle, many muscle fibers strongly react with anti-BB-1. In contrast, muscle fibers did not react with B7.1- or B7.2-monospecific mAbs in any of the pathologic specimens or in normal muscle. Our results demonstrate that human muscle cells can be induced to selectively express BB-1, a functional costimulatory molecule distinct from B7.1 and B7.2. This molecule may play an important role in the immunobiology of muscle.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Muscle can be a site of desirable and undesirable immune reactions (1). These are deliberately induced by protein- or DNA-based vaccination (2, 3) or develop spontaneously during the course of autoimmune and infectious muscle diseases (4, 5). Furthermore, local immune reactions can pose a serious problem after intramuscular injection of vectors for gene therapy (6, 7).

It has been suggested that muscle cells can actively participate in local immune reactions (1). Notably, human myoblasts can present Ags to CD4+ T cells (8). However, little is known about the costimulatory molecules expressed by muscle cells in vivo and in vitro. Here, we report that human myoblasts can be induced to selectively express BB-1, a functional CTLA4Ig3-binding costimulatory molecule that is distinct from B7.1 (CD80) and B7.2 (CD86) (9, 10, 11).

Our evidence for the differential expression and regulation of the different B7 molecules in muscle cells relies on functional, immunocytochemical and RT-PCR studies of cultured myoblasts. Furthermore, we investigated human muscle biopsy specimens for expression of the B7 family of costimulatory molecules, using mAbs specific for B7.1 (12) or B7.2 (13), and anti-BB-1 (9), a mAb that cross-reacts with B7.1 and a hitherto undefined member of the B7 family (10, 11). We observed that, whereas normal muscle fibers do not express B7 molecules, there is abundant expression of BB-1, but not B7.1 or B7.2, in different inflammatory myopathies. Based on these observations, we propose that BB-1 plays an important role in immune reactions in muscle.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Myoblast culture

Human myoblasts were isolated from muscle obtained for diagnostic reasons from patients with suspected myopathy. For in vitro experiments, myoblasts were obtained from nonmyopathic tissue. Myoblasts were cultured as previously described (8) with some modifications. Briefly, muscle specimens were mechanically dissociated and passed through a steel sieve (Tissue Grinder Kit, Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany). The homogenate was digested in trypsin-EDTA-solution (Life Technologies, Eggenstein, Germany) for 30 min at 37°C. The resulting suspension was centrifuged (5 min, 1500 rpm) and washed with PBS. The cells were transferred into plastic tissue culture flasks (Falcon, Heidelberg, Germany) and incubated in skeletal muscle cell growth medium (modified MCDB 120 supplemented with 5% FCS, 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF), 1 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), 0.5 mg/ml fetuin, 0.1 mg/ml insulin, 0.4 µg/ml dexamethasone, 50 µg/ml gentamicin sulfate, 50 ng/ml amphotericin B; PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany). After 30 min, nonadherent cells were removed and seeded in new tissue flasks coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma) and laminin (kindly provided by Dr. H. Neumann, MPI of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany) and cultured at 37°C at 5% CO2 in skeletal muscle cell growth medium (see above). The myoblasts were repeatedly purified during the culture period and 1 wk before experiments, using a magnetic cell separation system (Dynal, Hamburg, Germany) and anti-CD56 mAb (8) (NCAM/Leu-19; Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). Purity was checked by FACS analysis. Only >95% pure cultures were used in all experiments. The cultured myoblasts do not contain professional APC (macrophages or dendritic cells), since they are are negative for CD11b, CD14, and VCAM by flow cytometry and do not express B7.1 or B7.2 by RT-PCR. However, a small proportion (<5%) of NCAM-negative fibroblasts may be present. To exclude the possibility that fibroblasts also express BB-1, we isolated and expanded the NCAM-negative cell population and treated them with IFN-{gamma} or TNF-{alpha}, alone or in combination. The fibroblasts remained negative for B7.1, B7.2, and BB-1 by flow cytometry and did not transcribe B7.1 or B7.2 mRNA by RT-PCR.

The HLA-DR type of the myoblasts was determined by Drs. E. Albert and S. Scholz (Labor für Immungenetik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany), using PCR and sequence-specific oligonucleotide primers (Dynal).

Culture of CD40L-transfected mouse fibroblasts

CD40L-transfected Ltk cells (kindly provided by Dr. S. Lebecque, Schering-Plough, Dardilly, France) were cultured in plastic tissue culture flasks (Falcon) at 5% CO2 as described previously (14). The culture medium consisted of 45% DMEM, 45% F10-Nutrient Mix (HAM) with Glutamax-I, 10% FCS, 10 mM HEPES, and 50 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (all from Life Technologies). For coculture experiments, 3 x 105 myoblasts were incubated with the same number of irradiated (100 Gy) CD40L transfectants. Expression of surface molecules was determined by FACS analysis at 24, 48, and 72 h after initiation of cultures. The expression of CD40L on transfected L cells and CD40 on myoblasts was checked and confirmed in all experiments. The CD40L transfectants do not express B7.1, B7.2, or CD40. Myoblasts are CD40L negative (data not shown).

Monoclonal Abs

The source and working concentrations of the mAbs used as primary Abs for flow cytometry are as follows: anti-CD11b and anti-CD14 (IgG; 10 µg/ml; Becton Dickinson); anti-VCAM (IgG; 10 µg/ml; Novacastra, Dossenheim, Germany); anti-NCAM (Leu-19; IgG; 1:100; Becton Dickinson); anti-MHC class II (L243; hybridoma supernatant; 10 µg/ml; American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA); anti-B7.1 (L307; IgG; 10 µg/ml; M. Azuma, Tokyo, Japan (12)); anti-B7.2 (IT.2; IgG; 10 µg/ml; M. Azuma or PharMingen, Hamburg, Germany (13)); anti-BB-1 (IgM; 10 µg/ml; NatuTec, Frankfurt, Germany or PharMingen); anti-CD40 (Mab89; IgG; 10 µg/ml; S. Lebecque); and anti-CD40 CEA-5; IgG; 10 µg/ml; NatuTec). For controls, isotype-matched irrelevant mAbs were substituted at identical concentration (mouse anti-DNP; IgG or IgM; PharMingen). Dichlorotriazinyl-fluoresceine (DTAF)-conjugated goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgG and IgM were used as secondary Ab (1:150; Immunotech, Hamburg, Germany). Fusion protein human (h) CTLA-4 fused with mouse IgG2a (Ancell, Läufelfingen, Switzerland) was used at 10 µg/ml. This protein was detected with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig heavy and light chain (Immunotech).

For inhibition experiments, azide-free anti-MHC II, anti-B7.1, anti-B7.2, anti-BB-1, and CTLA4Ig (Ancell) were used at 5–50 µg/ml. Mouse IgM anti-DNP mAb was used as an isotype control for anti-BB-1.

For immunohistochemistry, anti-BB-1 was used at 10 µg/ml. Anti-MHC class I (W6/32; IgG; hybridoma supernatant; ATCC) and class II mAbs were used at 2 µg/ml. Cy3 F(ab')2 goat anti-mouse IgG and IgM were used at 2 µg/ml as the secondary reagent.

Cytokine induction

For analysis of inducible surface molecules and coculture experiments, myoblasts were cultured in the presence of 100 U/ml rIFN-{gamma} (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany) and/or 250 U/ml TNF-{alpha} (provided by Drs. U. Traugott and M. Müller-Neumann, BASF/Knoll, Ludwigshafen, Germany) or 500 U/ml rIL-4 (PromoCell) for the time indicated. These concentrations were found to induce maximal expression of inducible surface Ag. Expression was monitored at 24, 48, and 72 h following cytokine induction. For functional studies in cocultures, myoblasts were induced for 72 h with IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha}, or for 24 h with IL-4.

Ag-specific T cell lines

PBMC were stimulated with a synthetic peptide of human myelin basic protein (MBP; sequence 86–105; synthesized by Luis Moroder, MPI for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany), and CD4+ Ag-specific T cell lines were isolated using the split-well cloning technique as described previously (8). Every 2 wk, T cell cultures were restimulated with Ag plus irradiated (50 Gy) autologous or HLA-DR-matched PBMC. Ag-specific proliferation was measured by [3H]TdR incorporation. For coculture experiments with myoblasts, the MBP-specific T cell lines SS014 and SS018 were used between days 13 and 15 after the last restimulation with peptide Ag.

Coculture experiments of myoblasts and T cells

Myoblasts were plated in 96-well flat-bottom plates (Costar, Bodenheim, Germany) at a density of 2 x 104 cells/well and induced for 72 h with the indicated cytokines. In previous experiments, a cell density of 1–2 x 104 myoblasts per flat-bottom well was found optimal for T cell stimulation, because the myoblasts grow essentially confluent at this seeding density (8). After induction, myoblasts were irradiated with 50 Gy, washed in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies) and cultured in the presence or absence of Ag and 2 x 105 HLA-DR-matched or autologous Ag-specific T cells. Irradiated PBMC, isolated from blood using standard density gradient centrifugation (Lymphoprep, Nycomed, Oslo, Norway), were used as professional APC in control experiments. T cell proliferation was measured by [3H]TdR incorporation in a gas scintillation counter (Matrix 96 Direct Beta Counter, Packard, Frankfurt, Germany). It should be noted that the absolute counts measured by this "dry" scintillation system are only ~20% of the counts obtained by liquid scintillation (15); variability and proportions of the measured values are identical with both methods. Ag was used at a concentration of 5 µg/ml. Abs were used at the indicated concentrations (see mAb section).

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and PCR

Total cellular RNA was extracted using an RNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The RNA was subsequently treated with DNase I (Boehringer) for 15 min at 37°C to digest any potentially contaminating genomic DNA and afterward heated to 95°C for 5 min to inactivate the enzyme. RNA (100 ng) was reverse transcribed using random hexamer primers (Boehringer) and SuperScript TM Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies). Single-stranded cDNA was amplified in a thermal cycler (Biometra Personal Cycler, Biotron, Göttingen, Germany). All reactions were conducted in a total volume of 50 µl containing 2.5 U Taq Polymerase (Perkin-Elmer, Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany), 200 µM of each dNTP (Roth), and 50 pmol of each primer. The individual cycles of hot start PCR, after an initial denaturation of 5 min at 93°C, consisted of 1 min denaturation at 94°C, 1 min annealing at 60°C or 63°C (B7.1a), and 1 min extension at 72°C, followed by a 10-min extension step at 72°C. RNA from normal PBMC, which was not reverse transcribed, was used as a negative control in all PCR experiments. A 25-µl aliquot of the PCR reaction was eletrophoretically separated on a 1.7% agarose gel (Roth) using standard conditions. UV-induced fluorescence of ethidium bromide was used for visualization of amplified products. The correct size of the bands was determined by comparison with a DNA mass standard ({phi}-X 174, Life Technologies; and pUC8, MBI Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). All PCR products were sequenced (Medigene, Martinsried, Germany).

The primer sequences were as follows: ß-actin (accession no. M10277 (16)) forward, 5'-CCACACCTTCTACAATGAGC-3' (exon 3, position 1485–1504); ß-actin reverse, 5'-ACAGCCTGGATAGCAACGTA-3' (exon 4, position 2062–2081).

The primers for B7.1, B7.2, and CD40 (accession nos. M27533, L25259, and HSCDW40) were designed using published cDNA sequences (17, 18), as follows: B7.1a forward, 5'-GTGGCAACGCTGTCCTGTGGT-3' (cDNA-position 450–471); B7.1a reverse, 5'-CCAGGAGAGGTGAGGCAC-3' (cDNA-position 842–825); B7.2 forward, 5'-CCAAAGCCTGAGTGAGCTAGT-3' (cDNA position 270–291); B7.2 reverse, 5'-CTTAGGTTCTGGGTAACCGTG-3' (cDNA position 630–610); CD40 forward, 5'-TGGGGCTGCTTGCTGACCGC-3' (cDNA-position 78–97); CD40 reverse, 5'-CCAAAGCCGGGCGAGCATGA-3'(cDNA-position 436–417).

To rule out the presence of an unusual splice variant of B7.1 in myoblasts, two additional primer pairs (B7.1b and -c) were used for amplification of B7.1: B7.1b forward, 5'-ACTGGCAAAAGGAGAAGAAA-3' (cDNA position 511–530); B7.1b reverse, 5'-ATACAGGGCGTACACTTTCC-3' (cDNA position 1182–1163) (19); B7.1c forward, 5'-CCTAAGAATTCGAAGCCATGGGCCACACACCGAGG-3' (cDNA position 301–335); B7.1c reverse, 5'-TGGGCGCAGAGCCAGGATCA-3' (cDNA position 642–622) (20). Also, with these additional primers, only PBMC but not myoblasts were found to transcribe B7.1. The PCR products obtained from PBMC were confirmed as B7.1 by sequence analysis.

Muscle biopsy specimens for immunohistochemistry

Diagnostic muscle biopsy specimens were obtained from patients with inflammatory myopathies (six polymyositis, five dermatomyositis, six inclusion body myositis) and degenerative muscle disease (three Duchenne muscular dystrophy); there were three nonmyopathic controls.

Confocal laser microscopy

Twenty-micrometer serial cryostat muscle sections were analyzed. Optical sections were acquired in 0.5-µm steps along the z-axis with a confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with x40 oil objectives (Leica TCS 4D, Nussloch, Germany). Baseline labeling was revealed with irrelevant mAbs and secondary fluorochrome Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig. Fluorescence intensity signals were converted into different colors.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We investigated the expression of different members of the B7 family of costimulatory molecules in cultured human myoblasts and in muscle tissue. Myoblasts were stimulated a) with IFN-{gamma} and/or TNF-{alpha}, b) with IL-4, and c) with cross-linking anti-CD40 mAb or CD40L-transfected cells. In all cases, B7 transcription and protein expression were investigated by RT-PCR and FACS analysis. The functional role of B7 molecules induced in myoblasts was investigated in cocultures of myoblasts with MHC-class II-matched Ag-specific CD4+ T cell lines. All functional experiments were performed with highly purified NCAM-positive human myoblasts (8) (see Materials and Methods).

Myoblasts stimulated with IFN-{gamma} or TNF-{alpha} selectively express BB-1, a CTLA4Ig-binding costimulatory molecule distinct from B7.1 and B7.2

For detection of B7 molecule expression, we used mAbs against B7.1, B7.2, and an mAb named BB-1, which cross-reacts with B7.1 and an as yet undefined costimulatory molecule (9, 10, 11). Without cytokine treatment, myoblasts did not express B7.1 or B7.2 (Fig. 1Go). Myoblasts treated with TNF-{alpha} or IFN-{gamma}, alone or in combination, remained negative for B7.1 and B7.2, as analyzed by flow cytometry and RT-PCR (Fig. 2Go, A and B). In contrast, BB-1 was strongly induced after treatment of myoblasts with TNF-{alpha} or IFN-{gamma}, alone or in combination (Fig. 2GoA). Induction of BB-1 was maximal after 72 h of cytokine treatment.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. FACS analysis of untreated (nonstimulated) human myoblasts. The myoblasts uniformly express the differentiation marker NCAM (neural cell adhesion molecule). Nonstimulated myoblasts are negative for B7.1, B7.2, and BB-1 and do not bind CTLA4Ig. Open curve represents isotype control.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. A, Selective induction of BB-1 on human myoblasts treated with IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha}. Purity of the myoblasts is documented by NCAM expression (upper panel). After 24 h, no B7 molecules are detected. After 72 h, myoblasts express BB-1 and bind CTLA4Ig. Open curves represent isotype control. See B for corresponding RT-PCR results. B, Absence of B7.1 and B7.2 transcripts in IFN-{gamma}- and TNF-{alpha}-double-induced myoblasts. Myoblasts were induced for 72 h. Control PBMC constitutively transcribe B7.1 and B7.2. The right lane, labeled "Control," represents RNA that was not reverse transcribed. See A for corresponding FACS data. C, Absence of alternative transcripts of B7.1 in IFN-{gamma}/TNF-{alpha}-induced myoblasts. To exclude that cytokine-induced myoblasts contain alternative transcripts of B7.1, we repeated the RT-PCR experiment shown in B with two additional pairs of primers (B7.1b and B7.1c). Only PBMC, but not myoblasts, transcribe detectable levels of B7.1 mRNA. The PCR products obtained from PBMC were confirmed as B7.1 by sequencing.

 
Thus, after 72 h, the myoblasts remain negative for B7.1 both by immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR, but react with anti-BB-1 and CTLA4Ig. To rule out that anti-BB-1 and CTLA4Ig react with a splice variant of B7.1, we repeated the RT-PCR experiment with two additional primer pairs (B7.1b and B7.1c; see Materials and Methods). The results are shown in Fig. 2GoC. Also, with the additional B7.1 primers, a PCR product was obtained only from PBMC. Sequencing of the PCR products confirmed that they correspond to B7.1. Together with results from another group who used yet another set of B7.1 primers (21), our data suggest that B7.1 or B7.1 splice variants are absent in myoblasts.

Myoblasts induced with IL-4 express B7.1, B7.2, and BB-1 with different time kinetics

Next we assessed whether treatment with IL-4 can induce B7.1 or B7.2 in myoblasts. IL-4 has previously been reported to induce B7.1 or B7.2 in B cells, Langerhans cells, and keratinocytes (22, 23, 24). FACS analysis showed that IL-4 induces different members of the B7 family on myoblasts with different kinetics (Fig. 3GoA). After 24 h, anti-B7.1, anti-B7.2, anti-BB-1, and CTLA4Ig fusion protein all bound to myoblasts. After 72 h, B7.1 and B7.2 expression was reduced to background, whereas BB-1 and CTLA4Ig still bound strongly (Fig. 3GoA). Consistent with the FACS results, RT-PCR analysis showed that IL-4-induced myoblasts transcribe mRNA for B7.1 and B7.2 (Fig. 3GoB). Transcription was detected after 24 and 72 h. The FACS data provide further evidence for differential regulation of the different B7 family members in human myoblasts.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. A, FACS analysis of IL-4-induced myoblasts. After 24 h, the myoblasts express B7.1, B7.2, and BB-1 and bind CTLA4Ig. After 72 h, B7.1 and B7.2 are no longer detected. However, BB-1 expression and CTLA4Ig binding is still noticeable. See B for corresponding RT-PCR results. B, RT-PCR analysis of IL-4-induced myoblasts. IL-4-induced myoblasts and control PBMC transcribe mRNA for B7.1 and B7.2 after 24 and 72 h. Comparison with A shows that B7.1 and B7.2 were no longer detectable at the protein level after 72 h, although mRNA is still detectable at this time point. The discrepancy may be explained by the nonquantitative nature of the RT-PCR results. NCAM-negative control fibroblasts (Fibrobl.) do not transcribe B7.1 or B7.2. Lanes labeled "Control" represent RNA that was not reverse transcribed.

 
Although our myoblast preparations are >95% pure, they may contain a small fraction of NCAM-negative fibroblasts (see Materials and Methods). Therefore, we expanded fibroblasts from muscle tissue and used them as an additional control. As shown in Fig. 3GoB, these muscle-derived fibroblasts do not transcribe B7.1 or B7.2 and are therefore not the source of the B7 message detected in our myoblasts by RT-PCR.

Anti-CD40 stimulation differentially induces B7 molecules in myoblasts

B7 expression is known to be influenced by CD40-CD40L signaling (25, 26, 27, 28). We therefore asked whether human myoblasts express CD40 and, if so, whether CD40 stimulation would affect B7 expression in myoblasts. As shown in Fig. 4Go, NCAM-positive myoblasts constitutively and uniformly express CD40.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Constitutive expression of CD40 on NCAM-positive myoblasts.

 
To analyze the effects of CD40 stimulation on B7 expression, we stimulated myoblasts with the anti-CD40 mAb EA-5 or with CD40L-transfected mouse fibroblasts. Fig. 5GoA shows that stimulation with mAb EA-5 induces BB-1 but not B7.1 or B7.2 after 24 and 72 h. In contrast, a nonstimulatory anti-CD40 mAb (Mab89) (29) failed to induce any of the B7 molecules after 24, 48, or 72 h (data not shown). The results of RT-PCR analysis of myoblasts stimulated with mAb EA-5 are consistent with the FACS data (Fig. 5GoB).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. A, FACS analysis of myoblasts stimulated with anti-CD40 mAb EA-5. After 24 h, the myoblasts express BB-1, but not B7.1 or B7.2. After 72 h, BB-1 expression and CTLA4Ig binding is increased. See B for corresponding RT-PCR results. B, RT-PCR analysis of myoblasts stimulated with anti-CD40 mAb EA-5. B7.1 and B7.2 are undetectable after 24 and 72 h (compare A for corresponding FACS data). Control PBMC constitutively transcribe B7.1 and B7.2, whereas NCAM-negative fibroblasts are negative.

 
Coculture of myoblasts with CD40L transfectants induces weak expression of B7.1 after 24 h, which returns to background after 72 h (Fig. 6GoA). B7.2 was not expressed. BB-1 expression was maximal after 72 h. A similar staining pattern was seen with CTLA4Ig. The PCR results are consistent with the FACS data (Fig. 6GoB). Human control fibroblasts did not transcribe B7.1 or B7.2 (Fig. 6GoB). The CD40L-transfected mouse fibroblasts also did not yield a PCR signal for human B7.1 or B7.2 (not shown).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. A, FACS analysis of myoblasts cocultured with CD40L-transfected mouse L cells. After 24 h, there is a weak expression of B7.1 and weak binding of CTLA4Ig. After 72 h, B7.1 and B7.2 expression is undetectable, whereas BB-1 expression and CTLA4Ig binding are increased. See B for corresponding RT-PCR results. B, RT-PCR analysis of myoblasts cocultured with CD40L-transfected L cells. After 24 h, B7.1, but not B7.2 mRNA, is transcribed in myoblasts (this is consistent with the FACS data shown in A). After 72 h, no transcripts for B7.1 or B7.2 are detectable in myoblasts. Control PBMC constitutively transcribe B7.1 and B7.2, whereas NCAM-negative fibroblasts do not.

 
BB-1 on myoblasts costimulates Ag-specific CD4+ T cells

As previously reported, IFN-{gamma}/TNF-{alpha}-induced human myoblasts can act as facultative APC in vitro and present Ag to CD4+ Ag-specific T cell lines (8). To assess the functional role of BB-1 in this system, we cocultured IFN-{gamma}/TNF-{alpha}-double-induced myoblasts with autologous or HLA-DR-matched Ag-specific CD4+ T cell lines and measured Ag-induced proliferation in the presence of CTLA4Ig or mAbs against MHC class II, B7.1, B7.2, BB-1, or MHC class I (Fig. 7GoC). CTLA4Ig (10 µg/ml) was completely inhibitory (Fig. 7GoC). Furthermore, Ag presentation was completely blocked in the presence of anti-MHC-II mAbs or anti-BB-1, but not in the presence of B7.1- or B7.2-specific mAbs (Fig. 7GoC). Mouse IgM anti-DNP, which was used as an IgM isotype control for anti-BB-1, was not inhibitory (Fig. 7GoC).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Differential inhibition of Ag presentation by anti-B7.1, anti-B7.2, anti-BB-1 mAbs, and CTLA4Ig. Irradiated PBMC (A), IL-4-induced myoblasts (B), and IFN-{gamma}/TNF-{alpha}-double-induced human myoblasts (C) were incubated with or without Ag (MBP peptide 86–106), different anti-B7 mAbs, CTLA4Ig, or anti-MHC class II or class I mAb, and Ag-specific HLA-DR-matched CD4+ T line cells (SS014). With PBMC and IL-4-induced myoblasts, Ag presentation is inhibited by anti-B7.1, anti-B7.2, anti-BB-1, CTLA4Ig, and anti-MHC class II mAbs, whereas Ag presentation by IFN-{gamma}/TNF-{alpha}-induced myoblasts is inhibited only by anti-BB-1, CTLA4Ig, and anti-MHC class II, but not by anti-B7.1 or anti-B7.2 mAbs. Control mAb against MHC class I and an IgM isotype control mAb (anti-DNP) are not inhibitory. Note different scales for proliferation of T cells in the presence of PBMC (A) and myoblasts (B and C). In separate experiments, similar data were obtained with TCL SS014 and with a different MBP-specific TCL (SS018; see Table IGo).

 
In contrast, anti-B7.1, anti-B7.2, and anti-BB-1 mAbs all efficiently blocked the MHC-class II-restricted Ag presentation by control PBMC (Fig. 7GoA) and by myoblasts treated for 24 h with IL-4 (Fig. 7GoB). These functional data are consistent with our observation that IL-4-induced myoblasts transiently express B7.1 and B7.2 (Fig. 3GoA).

To corroborate the results of the functional experiments, we repeated the experiment with the same TCL (SS014) and with another MBP-specific CD4+ TCL (SS018). Mouse IgM anti-DNP was used as an isotype control for anti-BB-1. As shown in Table IGo, the results are consistent with those shown in Fig. 7Go, B and C.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Inhibitory effects of anti-B7 mAbs on Ag presentation by cytokine-induced myoblasts

 
Muscle fibers selectively express BB-1 but not B7.1 or B7.2 in inflammatory myopathy lesions

To assess whether muscle fibers express BB-1 or any other B7 molecule in muscle tissue, we treated cryostat sections of 23 muscle biopsy specimens from patients with polymyositis, dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy and from nonmyopathic controls with mAbs against B7.1, B7.2, and the BB-1 Ag for immunohistochemistry. B7.1 and B7.2 were detectable only on mononuclear cells in inflammatory infiltrates, but never on muscle fibers. In contrast, BB-1 was expressed on many muscle fibers in all inflammatory myopathy cases (six polymyositis, five dermatomyositis, six inclusion body myositis). In one case of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, BB-1 was expressed on a few scattered inflammatory cells, but not in muscle fibers. BB-1 was absent in nonmyopathic controls. In the inflammatory cases, the distribution of BB-1 was similar to HLA class I (Fig. 8Go). (It should be noted that HLA class I and II Ags are not detectable on normal muscle fibers in situ (1, 4)).



View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Confocal laser microscopy localization of BB-1 (A), MHC class I (C), and MHC class II (D) in human muscle. Serial transverse cryostat sections of a muscle biopsy specimen from a patient with polymyositis were processed as described in Materials and Methods. The control section (B) was treated with nonimmune IgG and IgM control Abs as primary reagents and Cy3 F(ab')2 goat anti-Mouse IgG and IgM as secondary Ab. Fluorescence signals were converted into different colors. There was strong, surface-associated expression of BB-1 in all muscle fibers in this area (A), closely resembling the distribution of MHC class I (C). The pattern of MHC class II expression was more patchy (D). In normal muscle, BB-1 and MHC expression is undetectable by immunohistochemistry (not shown). Magnification x300.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our study provides functional, immunocytochemical, RT-PCR, and histologic evidence for the differential regulation and expression of different B7 molecules in human muscle cells. Specifically, our data demonstrate that, in vitro, myoblasts can be induced to selectively express BB-1, a functional costimulatory molecule distinct from B7.1 and B7.2. Furthermore, we show that, in muscle tissue of patients with various inflammatory myopathies, but not in normal muscle, muscle fibers also selectively express BB-1.

The costimulatory molecules B7.1 (CD80) and B7.2 (CD86) are members of the Ig superfamily (30, 31, 32, 33, 34). They are expressed mainly on professional APCs and T cells. Although their precise function(s) and relationship with the ligands CD28 and CTLA-4 are still not completely understood, there is universal agreement that the B7 molecules provide critical costimulatory signals to T cells and play an essential role in normal and pathologic immune reactions (30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35).

The genes for murine and human B7.1 and B7.2 have been cloned (13, 17, 18, 36). It has long been suspected, however, that additional functional members of the B7 family exist. Indeed, discordant expression of BB-1 and B7 has been noted for activated human B lymphocytes (10) and keratinocytes (37). Furthermore, an alternative CTLA-4-binding molecule was identified on mouse B cells (38). Our present results provide strong additional support for the existence of at least one additional functional member of the B7 family of costimulatory molecules. Presently, our evidence for the differential expression and regulation of the different B7 molecules in muscle cells relies on the results of immunocytochemical and RT-PCR studies, and, perhaps most significantly, on functional experiments. Our results will provide a basis for future experiments to identify the postulated B7/BB-1 molecule at the molecular level. One problem that needs to be overcome is that only relatively small numbers of human myoblasts can be expanded from diagnostic muscle biopsy tissue, whereas large amounts of purified, cytokine-induced myoblasts will be needed for immunoprecipitation, Western blotting, and protein sequencing studies.

We isolated and cultured human myoblasts from adult muscle biopsy tissue, using standard protocols (8, 39). Myoblasts express the neural cell adhesion molecule NCAM, which serves as a convenient selection marker for magnetic bead sorting (8, 40). Our myoblast preparations are >95% NCAM positive. They do not contain professional APC (macrophages or dendritic cells), since they are negative for CD11b, CD14, and VCAM by flow cytometry and do not constitutively express B7.1 or B7.2 by RT-PCR and FACS analysis. However, a small proportion of NCAM-negative fibroblasts may be present. Therefore, we isolated and expanded the NCAM-negative cell population and used them as a control. After stimulation with cytokines, anti-CD40 mAb, or CD40L-transfected L cells, the human fibroblasts remained negative for B7.1, B7.2, and BB-1 by flow cytometry and did not transcribe B7.1 or B7.2 mRNA by RT-PCR. Therefore, the B7 transcripts and protein detected in our myoblast preparations could not have been derived from potentially contaminating NCAM-negative fibroblasts.

Our study reveals that, in myoblasts, B7.1, B7.2, and BB-1 are differentially regulated and expressed. Stimulation with IFN-{gamma} and/or TNF-{alpha} selectively induces BB-1, but not B7.1 or B7.2. Recently, the absence of expression of B7.1 and B7.2 in human myoblasts has also been reported by other groups (21, 41). To exclude the possibility that BB-1 and CTLA4Ig recognize a splice variant of B7.1 on cytokine-induced myoblasts, we used three different primer pairs for RT-PCR amplification of B7.1. In all cases, B7.1 was absent from myoblasts (Fig. 2Go, B and C). These results argue against the expression of an alternative splice form of B7.1 and support the notion that myoblasts can be induced to express a hitherto undefined B7 molecule recognized by anti-BB-1 and CTLA4Ig.

In contrast, stimulation with IL-4 induces B7.1 and B7.2, as well as BB-1, but with different kinetics. This is consistent with previous reports that IL-4 can induce B7.1 and B7.2 in B cells, Langerhans cells, and keratinocytes (Refs. 22–24 and 42; reviewed in 30 .

The CD40/CD40L pathway is known to play an important role in controlling B7.1 and B7.2 expression (Refs. 25–28; reviewed in Refs. 29, 43, and 44). Because we observed that myoblasts constitutively express CD40, we were interested to see whether stimulation with anti-CD40 mAb or CD40L-transfected cells can induce BB-1 or other B7 molecules in myoblasts. Again, we found evidence for selective expression and transcription of the different B7 molecules. Stimulation with anti-CD40 mAb selectively induces BB-1, but not B7.1 or B7.2. In contrast, stimulation with CD40L-transfected cells induces B7.1 and BB-1, but with different kinetics.

As we have shown previously, myoblasts treated with IFN-{gamma} can present different protein Ag to Ag-specific CD4+ HLA-DR-matched T cell lines (8). We used this system to investigate the functional role of the B7 molecules inducible on myoblasts. The results show that BB-1, which is selectively induced by treatment of myoblasts with IFN-{gamma}/TNF-{alpha}, provides a costimulatory signal to T cells. Proliferation of Ag-specific CD4+ T cells is completely blocked in the presence of anti-BB-1 mAb or CTLA4Ig, but not anti-B7.1 or -B7.2 mAbs. Of importance, the IFN-{gamma}/TNF-{alpha}-induced myoblasts do not express B7.1 and B7.2 by FACS analysis (Fig. 2GoA), nor do they transcribe B7.1 or B7.2 mRNA by RT-PCR (Fig. 2Go, B and C). The selective expression of BB-1 allows functional studies of BB-1 in isolation, without coexpression of B7.1 and B7.2 as it is observed in most other systems. By comparison, myoblasts treated with IL-4 for 24 h coexpress B7.1, B7.2, and BB-1 (Fig. 3Go). In this case, Ag presentation to CD4+ T cells was inhibited not only by anti-BB-1 mAb, but also by anti-B7.1 and anti-B7.2 mAbs (Fig. 7GoB).

To investigate whether our in vitro observations with cultured myoblasts are relevant in vivo, we studied the expression of B7 molecules on mature muscle fibers in muscle biopsy tissue. Muscle fibers are highly differentiated large syncytial cells that contain hundreds of nuclei. It would therefore not be surprising if the regulation of surface molecules such as B7 was different in muscle fibers as compared with mononuclear myoblasts. For example, whereas cultured human myoblasts constitutively express MHC class I (8), mature muscle fibers in muscle tissue are MHC class I negative, as assessed by immunohistochemical staining (1, 4, 5, 45). However, MHC class I molecules are strongly up-regulated on muscle fibers in inflammatory myopathies (1, 4, 5, 45).

This group of diseases includes dermatomyositis, different forms of polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis (1, 4, 5, 45, 46, 47). In dermatomyositis, muscle fiber injury is thought to be secondary to an Ab- or immune complex-mediated response against a vascular-endothelial component. In polymyositis and inclusion body myositis, CD8+ T cells and macrophages invade and destroy MHC-class I-positive muscle fibers. The autoaggressive CD8+ T cells are clonally expanded (48). They harbor granules, containing perforin, that aggregate near the contact zone with the target muscle fiber, suggesting a perforin- and secretion-dependent mechanism of muscle fiber injury (49).

We investigated B7 expression in 23 muscle biopsy specimens from patients with polymyositis, dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis, and Duchennne muscular dystrophy and from nonmyopathic controls, using mAbs directed against B7.1, B7.2, and BB-1 for immunohistochemistry and confocal laser microscopy. B7.1 and B7.2 were expressed on inflammatory cells in inflammatory myopathy tissue, but not on muscle fibers. In contrast, BB-1 was strongly expressed on many muscle fibers in the inflammatory myopathies, but not in nonmyopathic control tissue. The distribution of BB-1 resembles that of MHC class I (Fig. 8Go).

The induced and selective expression of BB-1 in inflammatory myopathy tissue is remarkably consistent with the selective induction and regulation of BB-1 in cultured myoblasts. Since many BB-1+ fibers are contacted by inflammatory cells, it is likely that both MHC class I and BB-1 are up-regulated under the influence of proinflammatory cytokines secreted by inflammatory T cells and macrophages. It seems that BB-1 plays an important role in the immunobiology of muscle and, hence, may be a target for therapeutic intervention in autoimmune muscle diseases.

It should be noted, however, that the significance of BB-1 expression in muscle reaches beyond its implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory myopathies. Muscle is the site for many other immune reactions, including muscle infections, graft-vs-host disease, conventional intramuscular vaccination, and, recently, intramuscular gene transfer by injection of genetically engineered myoblasts or naked DNA (1, 3, 6, 7, 50). In all these reactions, the induced expression of BB-1 on muscle fibers should play an important role.

Note added in proof. After submission of our manuscript it was reported that mAb BB-1 reacts with MHC class II-associated invariant chain CD74 (51). Our results with human muscle cells cannot be explained by the CD74 cross-reactivity of BB-1. First, B7.1/B7.2 double-negative myoblasts stained with BB-1 and CTLA4Ig (Fig. 2Go). Second, the costimulation of cultured T cells by B7.1/B7.2 double-negative, BB-1-positive myoblasts was inhibited not only with BB-1 but also with CTLA4Ig (Fig. 7Go). Third, the anti-CD74 mAb BU-45 (kindly provided by Drs. G. Moldenhauer and G. J. Hämmerling, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany) did not stain cultured myoblasts in FACS analysis or muscle fibers in tissue sections, whereas BB-1 did (our unpublished results).


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to Dr. Miyuki Azuma (Juntendo University School of Medicine, Department of Immunology, Tokyo, Japan) for kindly providing the B7.1 and B7.2 mAbs; Dr. Serge Lebecque, Schering-Plough, Dardilly, France for his gift of CD40L-transfected L cells; Dr. Harald Neumann, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany for help with the design of PCR primers and discussion; Dr. Luis Moroder, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried for peptide synthesis; Dr. Stefano Sotgiou for providing T cell clones; and Ms. Martina Sölch for excellent technical assistance. This work is part of the Ph.D. thesis of L.B.


    Footnotes
 
1 This study was supported by the Max-Planck Society, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 217, Project C13), and a European Community Grant (Project BMH4-CT96-0893). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Reinhard Hohlfeld, Department of Neuroimmunology, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, D-821521 Martinsried, Germany. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CTLA4Ig, CTL-associated protein 4 Ig; MBP, myelin basic protein; NCAM, neural cell adhesion molecule; TCL, T cell line. Back

Received for publication April 23, 1998. Accepted for publication July 30, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hohlfeld, R., A. G. Engel. 1994. The immunobiology of muscle. Immunol. Today 15:269.[Medline]
  2. Kumar, V., E. Sercarz. 1996. Genetic vaccination: the advantages of going naked. Nat. Med. 2:857.[Medline]
  3. Pardoll, D. M., A. M. Beckerleg. 1995. Exposing the immunology of naked DNA vaccines. Immunity 3:165.[Medline]
  4. Engel, A. G., R. Hohlfeld, B. Q. Banker. 1994. The polymyositis and dermatomyositis syndromes. A.G. Engel, and C. Franzini-Armstrong, eds. Myology 2nd ed.1335. McGraw Hill, New York.
  5. Dalakas, M. C.. 1991. Polymyositis, dermatomyositis and inclusion-body myositis. N. Engl. J. Med. 325:1487.[Medline]
  6. Miller, J. B., F. M. Boyce. 1995. Gene therapy by and for muscle cells. Trends Genet. 11:163.[Medline]
  7. Blau, H. M., M. L. Springer. 1995. Muscle-mediated gene therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 333:1554.[Free Full Text]
  8. Goebels, N., D. Michaelis, H. Wekerle, R. Hohlfeld. 1992. Human myoblasts as antigen-presenting cells. J. Immunol. 149:661.[Abstract]
  9. Yokochi, T., R. D. Holly, E. A. Clark. 1982. B lymphoblast antigen (BB-1) expressed on Epstein-Barr virus-activated B cell blasts, B blastoid cell lines, and Burkitt’s lymphoma. J. Immunol. 128:823.[Abstract]
  10. Boussiotis, V. K., G. J. Freeman, J. G. Gribben, J. Daley, G. Gray, L. M. Nadler. 1993. Activated human B lymphocytes express three CTLA-4 counterreceptors that costimulate T-cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:11059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Linsley, P. S., E. A. Clark, J. A. Ledbetter. 1990. T-cell antigen CD28 mediates adhesion with B cells by interacting with activation antigen B7/BB-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:5031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Azuma, M., M. Cayabyab, D. Buck, J. H. Phillips, L. L. Lanier. 1992. Involvement of CD28 in major histocompatibility complex-unrestricted cytotoxicity mediated by a human NK leukemia cell line. J. Immunol. 149:1115.[Abstract]
  13. Azuma, M., D. Ito, H. Yagita, K. Okumura, J. H. Phillips, L. L. Lanier, C. Somoza. 1993. B70 antigen is a second ligand for CTLA-4 and CD28. Nature 366:76.[Medline]
  14. Garrone, P., E. M. Neidhardt, E. Garcia, L. Galibert, C. Van Kooten, J. Banchereau. 1995. Fas ligation induces apoptosis of CD40-activated human B lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 182:1265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Meinl, E., F. Weber, K. Drexler, C. Morelle, M. Ott, G. Saruhan-Direskeneli, N. Goebels, B. Ertl, G. Jechart, G. Giegerich, S. Schönbeck, W. Bannwarth, H. Wekerle, R. Hohlfeld. 1993. Myelin basic protein-specific T lymphocyte repertoire in multiple sclerosis: complexity of response and dominance of nested epitopes due to recruitment of multiple T cell clones. J. Clin. Invest. 92:2633.
  16. Nakajima-Iijima, S., H. Hamada, P. Reddy, T. Kakunaga. 1985. Molecular structure of the human cytoplasmic ß-actin gene: interspecies homology of sequences in the introns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:6133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Freeman, G. J., A. S. Freedman, J. M. Segil, G. Lee, J. F. Whitman, L. M. Nadler. 1989. B7, a new member of the Ig superfamily with unique expression on activated and neoplastic B cells. J. Immunol. 143:2714.[Abstract]
  18. Freeman, G. J., J. G. Gribben, V. A. Boussiotis, J. W. Ng, V. A. Restivo, L. A. Lombard, G. S. Gray, L. M. Nadler. 1993. Cloning of B7-2: a CTLA-4 counter-receptor that costimulates human T cell proliferation. Science 262:909.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Denfeld, R. W., A. Dietrich, C. Wuttig, E. Tanczos, J. M. Weiss, W. Vanscheidt, E. Schöpf, J. C. Simon. 1995. In situ expression of B7 and CD28 receptor families in human malignant melanoma: relevance for T-cell mediated anti-tumor immunity. Int. J. Cancer 62:259.[Medline]
  20. Thurnher, M., C. Radmayr, A. Hobisch, G. Böck, N. Romani, G. Bartsch, H. Klocker. 1995. Tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes from renal-cell carcinoma express B7–1 (CD80): T cell expansion by T-T cell co-stimulation. Int. J. Cancer 62:559.[Medline]
  21. Bernasconi, P., P. Confalonieri, F. Andreetta, F. Baggi, F. Cornelio, R. Mantegazza. 1998. The expression of co-stimulatory and accessory molecules on cultured human muscle cells is not dependent on stimulus by pro-inflammatory cytokines: relevance for the pathogenesis of inflammatory myopathy. J. Neuroimmunol. 85:52.[Medline]
  22. Stack, R. M., D. J. Lenschow, G. S. Gray, J. A. Bluestone, F. W. Fitch. 1994. IL-4 treatment of small splenic B cells induces costimulatory molecules B7-1 and B7-2. J. Immunol. 152:5723.[Abstract]
  23. Kawamura, T., M. Furue. 1995. Comparative analysis of B7-1 and B7-2 expression in Langerhans cells: differential regulation by T helper type 1 and T helper type 2 cytokines. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:1913.[Medline]
  24. Junghans, V., T. Jung, C. Neumann. 1996. Human keratinocytes constitutively express IL-4 receptor molecules and respond to IL-4 with an increase of B7/BB1 expression. Exp. Dermatol. 5:316.[Medline]
  25. Roy, M., A. Aruffo, J. A. Ledbetter, P. S. Linsley, M. R. Kehry, R. Noelle. 1995. Studies on the interdependence of gp39 and B7-1 expression and function during antigen-specific immune responses. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:596.[Medline]
  26. Ranheim, E. A., T. J. Kipps. 1993. Activated T cells induce expression of B7/BB1 on normal or leukemic B cells through a CD40-dependent signal. J. Exp. Med. 177:925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Yang, Y., J. M. Wilson. 1996. CD40 ligand-dependent T cell activation: requirement of B7-CD28 signaling through CD40. Science 273:1862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Grewal, I. S., H. G. Foellmer, K. D. Grewal, J. Xu, F. Hardardottir, J. L. Baron, C. A. Janeway, R. A. Flavell. 1996. Requirement for CD40 ligand in costimulation induction, T cell activation, and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Science 273:1864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Banchereau, J., F. Bazan, D. Blanchard, F. Brière, J.-P. Galizzi, C. Van Kooten, Y. J. Liu, F. Rousset, S. Saeland. 1994. The CD40 antigen and its ligand. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:881.[Medline]
  30. Lenschow, D. J., T. L. Walunas, J. A. Bluestone. 1996. CD28/B7 system of T cell costimulation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:233.[Medline]
  31. Reiser, H., M. J. Stadecker. 1996. Costimulatory B7 molecules in the pathogenesis of infectious and autoimmune diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 335:1369.[Free Full Text]
  32. Thompson, C. B.. 1995. Distinct roles for the costimulatory ligands B7-1 and B7-2 in T helper cell differentiation. Cell 81:979.[Medline]
  33. Bluestone, J. A.. 1995. New perspectives of CD28/B7-mediated T cell costimulation. Immunity 2:855.
  34. June, C. H., J. A. Bluestone, L. M. Nadler, C. B. Thompson. 1998. The B7 and CD28 receptor families. Immunol. Today 15:321.
  35. Linsley, P. S., J. A. Ledbetter. 1993. The role of the CD28 receptor during T cell responses to antigen. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11:191.[Medline]
  36. Freeman, G. J., G. S. Gray, C. D. Gimmi, D. B. Lombard, L.-J. Zhou, M. White, J. D. Fingeroth, J. G. Gribben, L. M. Nadler. 1991. Structure, expression, and T cell costimulatory activity of the murine homologue of the human B lymphocyte activation antigen B7. J. Exp. Med. 174:625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Nickoloff, B. J., R. S. Mitra, K. Lee, L. A. Turka, J. Green, C. Thompson, Y. Shimizu. 1993. Discordant expression of CD28 ligands, BB-1, and B7 on keratinocytes in vitro and psoriatic cells in vivo. Am. J. Pathol. 142:1029.[Abstract]
  38. Murakami, M., Y. Takahashi, Y. Isashi, S. Kon, W.-Y. Jia, M. Inobe, R. Abe, T. Uede. 1996. Identification and characterization of an alternative cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated protein 4 molecule on B cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Blau, H. M., C. Webster. 1981. Isolation and characterization of human muscle cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:5623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Illa, I., M. Leon-Monzon, M. C. Dalakas. 1992. Regenerating and denervated human muscle fibers and satellite cells express neural cell adhesion molecule recognized by monoclonal antibodies and natural killer cells. Ann. Neurol. 31:46.[Medline]
  41. Curnow, S. J., N. Willcox, A. Vincent. 1998. Induction of primary immune responses by allogeneic human myoblasts: dissection of the cell types required for proliferation, IFN-{gamma} secretion, and cytotoxicity. J. Neuroimmunol. 86:53.[Medline]
  42. Valle, M. T., M. L. Degl’Innocenti, R. Bertelli, P. Facchetti, F. Perfumo, D. Fenoglio, A. Kunkl, R. Gusmano, F. Manca. 1995. Antigen-presenting function of human peritoneum mesothelial cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 101:172.[Medline]
  43. Laman, J. D., E. Claassen, R. J. Noelle. 1996. Functions of CD40 and its ligand, gp39 (CD40L). CRC Crit. Rev. Immunol. 16:59.
  44. Grewal, I. S., R. A. Flavell. 1996. A central role of CD40 ligand in the regulation of CD4+ T cell responses. Immunol. Today 17:410.[Medline]
  45. Dalakas, M. C., K. Sivakumar. 1996. The immunopathologic and inflammatory differences between dermatomyositis, polymyositis and sporadic inclusion body myositis. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 9:235.[Medline]
  46. Miller, F. W.. 1993. Myositis specific autoantibodies: touchstones for understanding the inflammatory myopathies. JAMA 270:1846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Hohlfeld, R., A. G. Engel, N. Goebels, L. Behrens. 1997. Cellular immune mechanisms in inflammatory myopathies. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 9:520.[Medline]
  48. Bender, A., N. Ernst, A. Iglesias, K. Dornmair, H. Wekerle, R. Hohlfeld. 1995. T cell receptor repertoire in polymyositis: clonal expansion of autoaggressive CD8+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 181:1863.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Goebels, N., D. Michaelis, M. Engelhardt, S. Huber, A. Bender, D. Pongratz, M. A. Johnson, H. Wekerle, J. Tschopp, D. Jenne, R. Hohlfeld. 1996. Differential expression of perforin in muscle-infiltrating T cells in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. J. Clin. Invest. 97:2905.[Medline]
  50. Mendoza, R. B., M. J. Cantwell, T. J. Kipps. 1997. Immunostimulatory effects of a plasmid-expressing CD40 ligand (CD154) on gene immunization. J. Immunol. 159:5777.[Abstract]
  51. Freeman, G. J., A. A. Cardoso, V. A. Boussiotis, A. Anumanthan, R. W. Graves, T. S. Kupper, E. A. Clark, L. M. Nadler. 1998. The BBI monoclonal antibody recognizes both cell surface CD74 (MHC class II-associated in variant chain) as well as B7-1 (CD80), resolving the question regarding a third CD28/CTLA-4 counterreceptor. J. Immunol. 161:2708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y.-A. Zhang, J.-i. Hikima, J. Li, S. E. LaPatra, Y.-P. Luo, and J. O. Sunyer
Conservation of Structural and Functional Features in a Primordial CD80/86 Molecule from Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), a Primitive Teleost Fish
J. Immunol., July 1, 2009; 183(1): 83 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. A. Greenberg
Proposed immunologic models of the inflammatory myopathies and potential therapeutic implications
Neurology, November 20, 2007; 69(21): 2008 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Katsumata, M. Harigai, T. Sugiura, M. Kawamoto, Y. Kawaguchi, Y. Matsumoto, K. Kohyama, M. Soejima, N. Kamatani, and M. Hara
Attenuation of Experimental Autoimmune Myositis by Blocking ICOS-ICOS Ligand Interaction
J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 3772 - 3779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Shirota, L. Petrenko, C. Hong, and D. M. Klinman
Potential of Transfected Muscle Cells to Contribute to DNA Vaccine Immunogenicity
J. Immunol., July 1, 2007; 179(1): 329 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. Dimitri, O. Benveniste, O. Dubourg, T. Maisonobe, B. Eymard, Z. Amoura, L. Jean, K. Tiev, J.-C. Piette, D. Klatzmann, et al.
Shared blood and muscle CD8+ T-cell expansions in inclusion body myositis
Brain, April 1, 2006; 129(4): 986 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. C. Dalakas
Inflammatory, immune, and viral aspects of inclusion-body myositis
Neurology, January 24, 2006; 66(1_suppl_1): S33 - S38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. Schmidt, G. Rakocevic, R. Raju, and M. C. Dalakas
Upregulated inducible co-stimulator (ICOS) and ICOS-ligand in inclusion body myositis muscle: significance for CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity
Brain, May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1182 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J. Imitola, M. Comabella, A. K. Chandraker, F. Dangond, M. H. Sayegh, E. Y. Snyder, and S. J. Khoury
Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Express Costimulatory Molecules That Are Differentially Regulated by Inflammatory and Apoptotic Stimuli
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2004; 164(5): 1615 - 1625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
S. Kurosawa, A. C. Myers, L. Chen, S. Wang, J. Ni, J. R. Plitt, N. M. Heller, B. S. Bochner, and R. P. Schleimer
Expression of the Costimulatory Molecule B7-H2 (Inducible Costimulator Ligand) by Human Airway Epithelial Cells
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., May 1, 2003; 28(5): 563 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
H. Wiendl, M. Mitsdoerffer, D. Schneider, A. Melms, H. Lochmuller, R. Hohlfeld, and M. Weller
Muscle fibres and cultured muscle cells express the B7.1/2-related inducible co-stimulatory molecule, ICOSL: implications for the pathogenesis of inflammatory myopathies
Brain, May 1, 2003; 126(5): 1026 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
H. Wiendl, M. Mitsdoerffer, V. Hofmeister, J. Wischhusen, E. H. Weiss, J. Dichgans, H. Lochmuller, R. Hohlfeld, A. Melms, and M. Weller
The non-classical MHC molecule HLA-G protects human muscle cells from immune-mediated lysis: implications for myoblast transplantation and gene therapy
Brain, January 1, 2003; 126(1): 176 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Reyes-Reyna, T. Stegall, and K. A. Krolick
Muscle Responds to an Antibody Reactive with the Acetylcholine Receptor by Up-Regulating Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1: A Chemokine with the Potential to Influence the Severity and Course of Experimental Myasthenia Gravis
J. Immunol., August 1, 2002; 169(3): 1579 - 1586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M C DALAKAS
Progress in inflammatory myopathies: good but not good enough
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2001; 70(5): 569 - 573.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. K. Kapsogeorgou, H. M. Moutsopoulos, and M. N. Manoussakis
Functional Expression of a Costimulatory B7.2 (CD86) Protein on Human Salivary Gland Epithelial Cells that Interacts with the CD28 Receptor, but Has Reduced Binding to CTLA4
J. Immunol., March 1, 2001; 166(5): 3107 - 3113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
F. Willermain, L. Caspers–Velu, N. Baudson, C. Dubois, M. Hamdane, F. Willems, T. Velu, and C. Bruyns
Role and Expression of CD40 on Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2000; 41(11): 3485 - 3491.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BrainHome page
K. Amemiya, R. P. Granger, and M. C. Dalakas
Clonal restriction of T-cell receptor expression by infiltrating lymphocytes in inclusion body myositis persists over time: Studies in repeated muscle biopsies
Brain, October 1, 2000; 123(10): 2030 - 2039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
K.-y. Murata and M. C. Dalakas
Expression of the co-stimulatory molecule BB-1, the ligands CTLA-4 and CD28 and their mRNAs in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
Brain, August 1, 2000; 123(8): 1660 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Sugiura, Y. Kawaguchi, M. Harigai, K. Takagi, S. Ohta, C. Fukasawa, M. Hara, and N. Kamatani
Increased CD40 Expression on Muscle Cells of Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis: Role of CD40-CD40 Ligand Interaction in IL-6, IL-8, IL-15, and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Production
J. Immunol., June 15, 2000; 164(12): 6593 - 6600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
K.-y. Murata and M. C. Dalakas
Expression of the Costimulatory Molecule BB-1, the Ligands CTLA-4 and CD28, and their mRNA in Inflammatory Myopathies
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 1999; 155(2): 453 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Behrens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hohlfeld, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Behrens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hohlfeld, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS