The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tedla, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tedla, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, A.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 161: 5663-5672.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Regulation of T Lymphocyte Trafficking into Lymph Nodes During an Immune Response by the Chemokines Macrophage Inflammatory Protein (MIP)-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß1

Nicodemus Tedla, Hong-Wei Wang, H. Patrick McNeil, Nick Di Girolamo, Taline Hampartzoumian, Denis Wakefield and Andrew Lloyd2

Inflammation Research Unit, School of Pathology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
By virtue of their target cell specificity, chemokines have the potential to selectively recruit leukocyte subpopulations into sites of inflammation. Their role in regulation of T lymphocyte traffic into lymph nodes during the development of an immune response has not previously been explored. The sensitization phase of contact hypersensitivity induced by the hapten, dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) in the mouse was used as a model of T lymphocyte trafficking in response to antigenic stimulation. Rapid accumulation of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in the draining lymph nodes was closely associated with strongly enhanced expression of macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß mRNAs and proteins. Mast cells accumulating in the nodes during DNFB sensitization were the predominant source of MIP-1ß, whereas MIP-1{alpha} was expressed by multiple cell types. Neutralization of these chemokines profoundly inhibited T lymphocyte trafficking into lymph nodes and altered the outcome of a subsequent challenge to DNFB. Thus, ß-chemokines regulate T lymphocyte emigration from the circulation into lymph nodes during an immune response and contribute significantly to the immunologic outcome.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The migratory properties of leukocytes have evolved to allow efficient surveillance of tissues for infectious pathogens and rapid accumulation at sites of injury or infection. In contrast to neutrophils and monocytes, T lymphocytes may exit from the vascular compartment via specialized high endothelial venules (HEV)3 in lymphoid organs and recirculate many thousands of times during their life span (1, 2). It has been estimated that one in every four lymphocytes leaves the circulation by crossing the HEV (3). After encountering Ag in lymph nodes, memory T lymphocytes continually patrol the body for that Ag by recirculating from the blood, through tissues, into the lymphatic system, and back to the blood (1, 2, 3, 4). T lymphocytes thus acquire a predilection, based on the environment in which they first encounter Ag, to home to, or recirculate through, that same environment (5, 6). Hence, relatively distinct subsets of T lymphocytes extravasate through the microvasculature in tissues such as skin and gut and across HEV in lymph nodes (4, 5, 6).

The arrival of Ag, and hence the induction of an immune response in the node, greatly increases blood flow and traffic of lymphocytes across HEV, coupled with a transient, sharp decrease in recirculating lymphocyte output from the efferent lymphatics (7, 8, 9). In lymph nodes undergoing an immune response, lymphocyte traffic across the HEV may increase substantially within 3 h after antigenic stimulation and by as much as 10-fold over the first 48 h of the response (8, 9). This effect is not caused by lymphocyte proliferation within the node nor by increased numbers of cells entering the lymph nodes from the lymphatics; instead, >95% of the effect is due to trafficking of cells from blood (8, 9).

At the molecular level, the leukocyte adhesion molecules, L-selectin, LFA-1 (CD11a/CD18), and VLA-4 (CD49d/CD29), mediate T lymphocyte binding to peripheral lymph node HEVs by interaction with glycosylation-dependent cell adhesion molecule-1 (GlyCAM-1) (10) or CD34 (11) for L-selectin, with ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 for LFA-1 (12, 13), and potentially with fibronectin for VLA-4 (14). Neutralizing antisera to L-selectin (15, 16), LFA-1 (17), or VLA-4 (14) markedly reduce lymphocyte migration into peripheral lymph nodes. Thus, lymphocyte recruitment into lymph nodes is likely to be a multistep process (similar to the processes of neutrophil and monocyte localization in inflammation) that requires L-selectin molecules to allow lymphocytes to "tether and roll" via low affinity interactions and LFA-1 or VLA-4 to induce firm adhesion to their counterreceptors (4, 18, 19). Activation of L-selectin alone has been shown to trigger the high affinity state of integrins on naive T lymphocytes in vitro (20, 21), thus providing a potential mechanism for the preferential recirculation of these cells through peripheral lymph nodes. However, pertussis toxin treatment abrogates LFA-1-dependent arrest of lymph node-derived lymphocytes (22) and may inhibit lymphocyte entry into secondary lymphoid organs (23), suggesting a requirement for G protein-linked signaling events in T lymphocyte trafficking into lymph nodes. Lymphocyte chemoattractants secreted from within peripheral lymph nodes and their G protein-coupled receptors expressed on lymphocyte subpopulations may provide this signal to stimulate integrin-dependent recruitment of lymphocyte subsets.

Members of the ß-chemokine family are known to direct T lymphocyte migration along a protein gradient (chemotaxis) (24, 25) and to induce adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins (26). The ß-chemokines MIP-1{alpha}, MIP-1ß, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, MCP-2, MCP-3, and RANTES reportedly show chemotactic activity for T cells in vitro (27). Of these chemokines, some in vitro studies suggest that MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß preferentially attract CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, respectively (24, 25, 28).

We have recently reported the first evidence for a potential role of chemokines in the regulation of lymphocyte traffic into lymph nodes in studies of nodes taken from HIV-1-infected patients and control subjects (29). Strong expression of MIP-1{alpha} in the HIV lymph nodes was associated with the accumulation of CD8+ T cells in these tissues. The present experiments were designed to further define the potential in vivo role of MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß in recruitment of T cell subsets to lymph nodes during an immune response. The well-characterized murine model of contact hypersensitivity induced by dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) was chosen for this study. It is believed that both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets are involved in the development of contact hypersensitivity mediated by DNFB, because studies to define the specific role of either subset have provided conflicting results (30, 31, 32). The pattern of expression of MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß mRNAs and proteins in draining lymph nodes of DNFB-painted mice was examined, and the kinetics of accumulation of T lymphocyte subsets in the nodes was determined.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

Six- to eight-week-old male and female C3H/HeN mice were bred in specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions in the Animal Breeding and Holding Unit at the University of New South Wales. SPF conditions were maintained throughout the experimental phase of the study. For the experiments described, each sampling point consisted of four mice.

Sensitization of contact hypersensitivity

Twenty-five microliters of 0.5% 2,4-DNFB (Sigma, Sydney, Australia) in 4/1 diluted acetone/olive oil (Sigma) was applied to the freshly shaved abdominal surface of mice on day 0 and day 1 for sensitization (33). Control mice were painted on the shaved abdomen with 25 µl of the vehicle alone.

Elicitation of contact hypersensitivity and evaluation of ear swelling

Five days after sensitization, mice were challenged by applying 10 µl of 0.2% DNFB in acetone/olive oil to one ear. Control mice were similarly painted with the vehicle alone. The degree of ear swelling was measured before challenge and 24 h postchallenge using an engineer’s micrometer (Mitutoyo, Tokyo, Japan). Each earlobe was measured twice and contact hypersensitivity determined as the amount of swelling of the hapten-challenged ear compared with the thickness of the vehicle-treated ear, expressed in micrometers (mean ± SD). Mice that were challenged with the hapten without previous sensitization served as an additional negative control.

Antichemokine treatment in vivo

Four hours before DNFB sensitization, neutralizing goat anti-mouse polyclonal Abs directed against murine MIP-1{alpha} and/or MIP-1ß were injected i.p., diluted in sterile endotoxin-free saline, and control animals were injected with control goat IgG (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) in comparable doses to the experimental animals. Mice were coded so that cell counts obtained during the sensitization phase and ear thickness measurements after challenge were made by an independent observer without knowledge of the status of the mouse.

Peripheral blood collection

Anticoagulated blood (200–500 µl) was collected from the heart of each mouse 1–2 min after the animals were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation, and a vertical neck-to-tail skin incision was performed. Two sets of thin blood films were made for differential counting after Giemsa-Grunwald staining, and the total cell count was measured by automated cell counter (Sysmex NE 800, Australian Diagnostic Services, Sydney, Australia). Blood (50 µl) was used to stain cell surface markers with mAbs in three-color flow cytometry (see below).

Lymph node excision

Both right and left inguinal lymph nodes were removed by carefully dissecting the tissue to a radius of approximately 1 cm from the center of the node. The right inguinal lymph node of each animal was used to prepare a single-cell suspension, and the left inguinal lymph node was fixed in 10% buffered formalin (pH 7.0) and embedded in paraffin. Additional mice were used to harvest the right inguinal node for extraction of protein from tissue lysates, and the left inguinal node was snap frozen by embedding the tissue in Tissue-Tek (OCT compound, Miles, Elkhart, IN) before storage at -70°C for subsequent immunohistochemical studies.

Preparation of the single-cell suspension

A cell suspension from each right inguinal lymph node was prepared using a modification of a previously published method (34). In brief, the lymph node was weighed and washed twice in RPMI 1640/10% FCS supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin and L-glutamine. The tissue was minced to nearly complete dissociation using scissors and forceps in a 6-well cell culture dish (Costar, Cambridge, MA) and resuspended in 4 ml of the above-mentioned medium. One mg/ml of collagenase type H (Boehringer Mannheim, Berlin, Germany) containing 1 mM calcium chloride was added to the mince, which was then incubated at 37°C for 60 min. Digestion was then stopped by adding 1 ml of RPMI 1640/20% FCS and the suspension filtered through a 40-µm nylon cell strainer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) into a 50-ml Falcon tube. A tuberculin syringe plunger was used to tease cells from tissue on top of the nylon mesh with repeated rinsing in PBS. The cells were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in this medium at 2 x 106/ml. The total cell count was enumerated after assessment of viability with trypan blue.

Measurement of differential leukocyte counts in the lymph nodes

From each single-cell suspension, four air-dried smears were made. One slide from each mouse was then stained with Giemsa-Grunwald to determine a differential leukocyte count. The remaining three slides were fixed in acetone and stored at -20°C for immunohistochemical staining.

Three-color flow cytometry

The Abs use in flow cytometry included: anti-CD3-FITC, anti-CD4-R-phycoerythrin (R-PE), and anti-CD8a-RED163, which were rat anti-mouse mAbs purchased from Life Technologies (Victoria, Australia). An irrelevant negative control IgG with subclasses {gamma}1 and {gamma}2a (IgG1-FITC/IgG2a-PE) and the FACS lysing solution were purchased from Becton Dickinson. The wash solution consisted of PBS containing 2% BSA and 0.2% sodium azide. A 1% paraformaldehyde solution in PBS was used to fix cells after staining.

mAb (4 µl) and ~2 x 105 cells in 100 µl were added to each labeling tube. After mixing, tubes were incubated in the dark at 4°C for at least 30 min, then FACS lysing solution was added and tubes were further incubated at room temperature for 10 min followed by centrifugation. The supernatant was decanted and the cell pellet washed and then fixed in paraformaldehyde solution. A total of 10,000 events were acquired using a FACScan flow cytometer and data analysis performed with PC LYSIS II software (Becton Dickinson).

Analysis of proliferating lymphocytes in vivo

To determine the proportion of proliferating lymphocytes in response to DNFB sensitization, as opposed to the cells recruited into the lymph nodes, a mAb against proliferating cell nuclear Ag (PCNA) conjugated to FITC was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany). Lymph node-derived single-cell suspensions (106/ml) were fixed for 2 min in 1% paraformaldehyde, followed by washing in cold PBS. Cells were then incubated in 100% methanol at -20°C for 10 min, centrifuged again, and washed in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X100 (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany). Subsequently, cells were incubated with anti-PCNA Ab (1.25 µg in 50 µl of 2% BSA in PBS) for 15 min at room temperature. After washing in PBS supplemented with 2% BSA, the cells were spun down and incubated with anti-CD4-R-PE and anti-CD8a-RED163 Abs for at least 30 min at 4°C in the dark. Cells were then washed twice in PBS/2% BSA and resuspended in PBS. As a positive control for this analysis, lymph node-derived mononuclear cells were stimulated in vitro with 10 µg/ml of phytohemagglutinin (Wellcome Diagnostics, Charlotte, NC) before staining as described above. Samples were analyzed on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson) equipped with LYSIS II software.

In situ hybridisation

Single-stranded cRNA probes of 350 bp in both the antisense and sense orientation were prepared by in vitro transcription from murine MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß plasmid cDNAs using a nonisotopic probe-labeling technique (digoxigenin; Boehringer Mannheim). After a 2-h prehybridization at 42°C, hybridization was performed overnight at the same temperature using 100 ng of probe in 25 µl of prehybridization solution on 4-µm thick, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. This was followed by repeated stringency washing at 42°C in 0.5x SSC. These hybridization and washing conditions were empirically determined to give optimal signal with the antisense probes, but minimal nonspecific signal with the control (sense strand) probes. Probe detection was conducted according to the manufacturer’s directions with an anti-digoxigenin mAb conjugated to alkaline phosphatase followed by an appropriate substrate (nitro blue tetrazolium + 5'-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (NBT + BCIP); Boehringer Mannheim). Control samples included sections of lymph nodes of the DNFB-treated mice hybridized without probe or without Ab detection, as well as sections obtained from the lymph nodes of acetone-treated mice.

Immunohistochemical staining

A standard two-step streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase staining technique was performed to identify cell types on frozen sections and smears using primary rat mAbs against mouse T cell Ags CD3, CD4, CD8; a B cell marker, CD40; and a marker for tissue macrophages (Mac-1); as well as an isotype-matched negative control Ab. A biotinylated rabbit anti-rat secondary Ab was used. All of the above Abs were purchased from Serotec (Australian Laboratory Services, Sydney, Australia). A polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse Ab directed against mast cell protease-5 (MMCP-5; 35 was used to stain mast cells in formalin-fixed lymph node tissues after an enzymatic digestion and Ag retrieval by microwave treatment of the sections in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.0. A biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary Ab was used for this staining (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Immunohistochemical staining using primary goat anti-mouse polyclonal Abs directed against MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß (R&D Systems) and secondary donkey anti-goat IgG directly conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Serotec) were used to detect MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß proteins in formalin-fixed sections after a similar enzymatic digestion and Ag retrieval by microwave of the sections in citrate buffer. An isotype-matched goat IgG (R&D Systems) was used as a negative control.

A standard two-step streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase staining technique was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lymph node sections to localize proliferating cells using primary anti-PCNA mAb (Dako) and a biotinylated goat anti-mouse secondary Ab (Serotec).

Quantitative evaluation of MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß mRNA expression

After a systemic sampling procedure as described elsewhere (29), computer-assisted morphometric analysis of lymph node sections was used to quantitate the number of cells expressing chemokine mRNAs as well as the total number of mast cells in the nodes (36). In brief, contiguous fields across the whole section (on average, 10 fields) at a final magnification of 250x were assessed. After ensuring that the sections hybridized with the sense probes exhibited no significant signal, the number of positive cells (cytoplasmic blue staining) per field was enumerated. Although significant regional variations in staining were observed, the mean count for the whole section is reported as a conservative measure of the signal for each probe. Morphologic analyses and immunohistochemical staining of adjacent sections were used to determine the cellular sources of MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß.

Analysis of MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß production by Western blotting

Cell lysates from groups of three mice sacrificed 4, 24, and 96 h after DNFB repainting, and 24 h after acetone/olive oil repainting (control mice), were prepared using a standard method. To ensure equal loading of protein, the amount of total protein in the cell lysate was measured using the bicinchonic acid protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Lymph node-derived cell lysates were electrophoretically separated on a 4% stacking and 10% resolving acrylamide gel under nonreducing conditions and then transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, Sydney, Australia) using a Trans-blot SemiDry Electrophoretic Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad, Sydney, Australia). After protein transfer, the membranes were washed twice in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) for 15 min at room temperature. Membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with 50 ml of blocking solution containing 3% BSA and 5% skim milk powder in TBS. The membranes were then rinsed twice with TBS for 5 min at room temperature and incubated with the primary goat anti-mouse MIP-1{alpha} or MIP-1ß Ab (R&D Systems) for 1 h at room temperature with continuous gentle shaking. Primary Abs were reconstituted in sterile PBS at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and used at a 1:500 dilution. After incubation with the primary Ab, the membrane was washed four times for 15 min with TBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a 1:500 dilution of donkey anti-goat secondary Ab (Serotec), which was directly conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Membranes were then washed four times for 15 min in TBS, followed by the addition of a chemiluminescence reagent (Renaissance, DuPont, Sydney, Australia). The membranes were finally exposed to X-OMAT-AR scientific imaging film (Kodak, Sydney, Australia).

Metachromatic staining

After dewaxing and a 10-min incubation with 0.5 N hydrochloric acid, overnight staining with 1% toluidine blue in 0.5 N HCL was used as a metachromatic stain for mouse mast cells in the formalin-fixed lymph node tissue sections. A standard hematoxylin and eosin staining method was used for evaluation of the histopathologic changes in the lymph node.

Statistical analysis

A computer software program, Microsoft EXCEL, version 5.0 (Microsoft, Seattle, WA), was used to calculate means and SD. To assess the level of statistical significance, a two-tailed Mann-WhitneyU test was performed using a statistical software program, SPSS for Windows, version 6.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Parameters of interest in each group of DNFB-treated animals were analyzed for statistical significance in comparison with control animals. As several comparisons were performed, Bonferoni adjustments for statistical significance were made.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DNFB sensitization causes a rapid increase in cellularity and weight of inguinal lymph nodes

The lymph node weight increased significantly within 30 min of repainting with DNFB (p < 0.01), peaking at 12 h and gradually decreasing thereafter (Fig. 1GoA). The lymph node weight remained mildly increased above that of the control animals 1 mo after repainting. The enlargement of the lymph nodes was accompanied by a >10-fold increase in the number of nucleated cells in the nodes (Fig. 1GoA). Differential cell counting after Giemsa-Grunwald staining of the cell smears showed that >90% of the cells in lymph nodes of DNFB-painted mice were lymphocytes, confirming that these cells represented the predominant leukocyte subpopulation accumulating in the nodes. A substantial proportion of the increase in lymphocyte numbers was evident within 30 min, with ~85% of the peak increase detected within 12 h (Fig. 1GoA). This rapid accumulation was statistically significant (p < 0.01) when compared with the control animals. The brisk kinetics indicate increased lymphocyte traffic into the nodes (and perhaps reduced output) rather than in situ proliferation of lymphocytes.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. DFNB sensitization produces a rapid increase in the weight and cellularity of inguinal lymph node (A) and a decrease in the peripheral blood leukocyte count (B). The right inguinal lymph node collected from animals sensitized by painting with 0.5% DNFB and control animals treated with vehicle alone (acetone) were weighed, minced, and digested with collegenase. Single-cell suspensions prepared from each node were counted both manually and with an automated cell counter (Sysmex NE 800). Cell smears prepared from the single-cell suspension were used for differential cell counting after Giemsa-Grunwald staining. A total leukocyte count was also performed, using the automated cell counter, in peripheral blood collected from each animal. Each experimental group consisted of four animals, and each experiment was performed twice. "Acetone" on the x-axis represents pooled data from two sets of four control animals that were sacrificed 4 and 24 h after repainting with vehicle alone. Results are presented as mean ± SD.

 
DNFB repainting induces a rapid drop in PBL counts

Further evidence in support of the notion of increased trafficking of lymphocytes into lymph nodes was obtained from the rapid decrease in lymphocyte numbers in peripheral blood coincident with their accumulation in the lymph nodes. Sensitization with DNFB produced an ~50% reduction in the total number of PBL within the first 30 min after repainting (Fig. 1GoB). The count gradually returned to normal values within 48 h after the treatment.

CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes accumulate in lymph nodes after repainting with DNFB

Three-color flow cytometric analysis of the draining lymph nodes of DNFB-treated mice showed a significant increase in the total (CD3+) T lymphocytes in lymph nodes, which peaked within 12 to 24 h after repainting (Fig. 2GoA). Both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte subsets showed a similar rapid increase (p < 0.01 for each) following repainting with DNFB. After reaching a peak at 24 h, the CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte numbers in the nodes of DNFB-treated mice remained significantly higher than those of control lymph nodes 28 days after the repainting. The proportions of PCNA-positive CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets, however, remained <2.5% (Table IGo) over the first 24 h, suggesting that the marked increase of both T cell subpopulations was predominantly attributable to recruitment rather than proliferation in situ.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. DFNB sensitization produces a rapid increase in CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in lymph nodes (A) and an associated decrease in the peripheral blood (B). Cells (2 x 105) of the single-cell suspension from the inguinal lymph node and heparinized whole blood obtained from each animal were stained with rat anti-mouse CD3-FITC, CD4-R-PE, and CD8-RED613 mAbs. To obtain the proportions of the T cell subsets, three-color flow cytometric analysis was performed on the lymphocyte gate based on forward and side scatter as well as the T cell (CD3) gate. The absolute values for the T cell subsets were then obtained from the total leukocyte count, the proportions of total lymphocytes (obtained from the differential count), and the proportions of the T cell subsets (obtained from the flow cytometry). Isotype-matched irrelevant rat IgG Abs conjugated to the three different fluorochromes were used as negative controls. Each experimental group consisted of four animals, and each experiment was performed twice. "Acetone" on the x-axis represents pooled data from two sets of four control animals that were sacrificed 4 and 24 h after repainting with vehicle alone. Results are presented as mean ± SD.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Induction of cell proliferation in draining lymph nodes of mice treated with DNFB1

 
In the peripheral blood, there was a rapid and marked drop in the number of total T lymphocytes (CD3+), >50% in the first 30 min, which gradually recovered within 24 to 48 h posttreatment (Fig. 2GoB). This reduction included both the CD4+ and CD8+ populations (Fig. 2GoB).

DNFB sensitization induces parafollicular hyperplasia and sinus histiocytosis of draining lymph nodes

During the period of lymph node enlargement after DNFB repainting (0–4 days), histologic examination revealed prominent subcapsular and medullary sinus expansion (data not shown). These regions were filled with a large number of leukocytes, predominantly lymphocytes, macrophages, and mast cells, but also polymorphonuclear cells. At later time points, there was also a significant enlargement of the hilar region and a slight expansion the medullary regions of the nodes. A less pronounced expansion of the paracortex was also noted. Increased activity of germinal centers was visible in some nodes (data not shown).

MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß are rapidly induced during DNFB sensitization

In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical staining of the draining lymph nodes demonstrated the induction of MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß mRNAs (Fig. 3Go) and abundant production of these proteins in animals sensitized with DNFB (Fig. 3Go). By contrast, lymph nodes obtained from acetone-painted (control) mice showed no expression of these chemokine mRNAs (Figs. 3Go and 5Go). Computer-assisted morphometric analysis of lymph node sections to quantitate the number of cells expressing chemokine mRNA, confirmed the maximal induction of both chemokines at 4 h (Fig. 4GoA). As expected, the kinetics of induction of the chemokine proteins in Western blot analyses was slightly delayed in comparison with the mRNA. MIP-1ß expression was faintly evident in control tissues and was relatively constant from 4–96 h after DNFB treatment (Fig. 4GoB, upper panel), whereas MIP-1{alpha} expression appeared maximal at 24 h (Fig. 4GoB, lower panel). Thus, the expression of these chemokine proteins was coincident with the accumulation of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte subsets, suggesting a functional role for these chemokines in the regulation of T lymphocyte recruitment.



View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. DFNB sensitization rapidly induces expression of MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß mRNAs in draining lymph nodes. A and B, Sections (160x magnification) from animals sacrificed 4 and 24 h after DNFB repainting, showing intense blue staining of MIP-1ß mRNA-expressing cells located in the subcapsular and hilar regions. The background is lightly counterstained with neutral red. C, Lymph node section from a mouse sacrificed 4 h after repainting with DNFB, hybridized with the MIP-1{alpha} probe, showing abundant expression of the chemokine mRNA (blue staining) in the hilar and medullary regions. D, Section obtained 24 h after repainting with DNFB, showing substantial parafollicular staining of MIP-1{alpha} mRNA. Hybridization of adjacent sections to those shown in A–D with the sense MIP-1ß amd MIP-1{alpha} probes showedno signal (data not shown). E, A lymph node section from an acetone-painted (control) mouse hybridized with the atisense MIP-1{alpha} probe showing no mRNA signal. No positive signal was found in control lymph node sections hybridized with the antisense MIP-1ß probe (data not shown). F, Immunohistochemical stain (positive cells stained red) with anti-MIP-1{alpha} Ab on a section from an animal sacrificed 24 h after repainting with DNFB.

 


View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Mast cells are the predominant source of MIP-1ß in draining lymph nodes during DNFB sensitization. A and B, Adjacent sections of the subcapsular region (250x magnification) of a lymph node from a mouse sacrificed 4 h after DNFB treatment, showing expression of MIP-1ß mRNA (blue staining with background neutral red counterstaining; A), which colocalized with cells immunostained for MMCP-5, indicative of mast cells (red staining with hematoxylin counterstaining; B). The arrows indicate at least two of the mast cells, which can confidently be identified in both sections. C and F, Adjacent sections of the subcapsular region of a lymph node from an acetone-treated (control) mouse illustrating the absence of MIP-1ß mRNA expression (F), despite the presence of MMCP-5-positive mast cells (red staining; C) in the adjacent section. D, Lymph node section from a mouse sacrificed 24 h after DNFB treatment, immunostained with an anti-MIP-1ß Ab showing widespread staining (in red) of the lumenal surface od endothelial cells (arrows). E, An adjacent section to D, stained with control goat IgG (negative control).

 


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Chemokine mRNA and protein expression in draining lymph nodes increases dramatically during DNFB sensitization. A, In situ hybridization was performed using MIP-1{alpha} or MIP-1ß riboprobes. Contiguous high power fields across each whole section were examined before the mean number of cells per high power field (±SEM) was enumerated with a computer-assisted analysis system. Two lymph node sections from each mouse (four mice per time point) were analysed. B, Immunoblotting from chemokines in cell lysates prepared from mouse lymph nodes using anti-MIP-1ß Ab (upper panel) demonstrated the production of an ~8.5-kDa MIP-1ß protein at 4, 24, and 96 h after repainting with DNFB. The 8.3-kDa band of the standard m.w. marker (Bio-Rad) is indicated on the left side of the membrane. Immunoblotting of cell lysates derived from mouse lymph nodes using an anti-MIP-1{alpha} Ab (lower panel) demonstrated the production of an ~8.5-kDa protein at 4 h (lane 2) and 24 h (lane 3) but not at 96 h (lane 4) after repainting with DNFB. Lysates from acetone-painted (control) mice (lane 1) showed no detectable MIP-1{alpha}. Each lane was loaded with an equal amount (20 µg) of cell lysate derived from a pool of four to five animals.

 
MIP-1ß is expressed predominantly by mast cells, whereas MIP-1{alpha} is expressed by a wide range of lymph node cells

Histomorphologic and immunohistochemical studies of lymph node sections revealed the cellular sources of MIP-1ß mRNA were significantly different from those of MIP-1{alpha}. At all time points, a range of cell types in the nodes was found to express MIP-1{alpha}, including macrophages, lymphocytes, and endothelial cells (figure not shown). By contrast, a striking and novel finding was the demonstration that mast cells were the predominant source of MIP-1ß mRNA in the lymph nodes of DNFB-treated mice (Fig. 5Go). Furthermore, computer-assisted quantitation in the nodes confirmed a significant increase in the number of mast cells in the subcapsular and hilar regions of the draining nodes (54). This increase was concurrent with a decrease in the number of mast cells at the site of sensitization in the skin, thus suggesting that mast cells travel from the skin via afferent lymphatics. Immunohistochemical detection of MIP-1ß protein confirmed the mast cell localization of this chemokine. Furthermore, prominent staining of MIP-1ß was found on endothelial cells (Fig. 5GoD), despite the absence of detectable mRNA in these cells. As the accumulation of MIP-1ß-expressing mast cells coincided with the accumulation of T lymphocytes in the nodes, this pathway may be critical to the observed rapid recruitment of T lymphocytes into the nodes after DNFB repainting.

Treatment with anti-chemokine Abs abrogates T cell recruitment to the draining lymph nodes

To test whether T lymphocyte recruitment in this model was dependent on MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß, mice were given an i.p. injection of neutralizing anti-chemokine Abs 4 h before the first painting with DNFB (37, 38). The anti-chemokine Abs caused a dose-dependent inhibition of the recruitment of T lymphocytes to the draining lymph nodes. Administration of 50, 200, or 500 µg of anti-MIP-1{alpha} Ab reduced CD3+ T cell numbers, evaluated at 24 h after repainting, by 16% (p < 0.05), 31% (p < 0.01), or 48% (p < 0.01), respectively, of the cell numbers in animals injected with 1000 µg of control Ab. Similarly, anti-MIP-1ß Ab treatment in the same doses produced 10, 20, and 49% inhibition. The inhibition produced by pretreatment of mice with 500 µg of either anti-MIP-1{alpha} or anti-MIP-1ß Abs was significant for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (p < 0.01 for all four comparisons; Fig. 6Go).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Chemokine inhibition reduces recruitment of T lymphocytes in the lymph nodes. Four hours before sensitization with DNFB, experimental animals were pretreated by i.p. injection of 500 µg of anti-MIP-1{alpha} and/or anti-MIP-1ß neutralizing Abs. Control animals were injected with control goat IgG in doses comparable to those given the experimental animals. Pretreatment with anti-MIP-1{alpha} and/or anti MIP-1ß Abs significantly abrogated the recruitment of T lymphocytes into the draining lymph nodes. Mice similarly treated with the maximum amount (1 µg) of control goat IgG showed no inhibition of T cell accumulation after DNFB sensitization. Each experimental and control group consisted of four animals. Results are presented as mean ± SD.

 
Treatment with anti-chemokine Abs modifies a subsequent delayed-type hypersensitivity response

To assess the effect of chemokine inhibition on the outcome of the DNFB-induced immune response, mice treated with a combination of anti-MIP-1{alpha} (500 µg) and anti-MIP-1ß (500 µg) Abs before DNFB sensitization were challenged 5 days later with 0.2% DNFB applied to the left ear. Mice that were injected with control Ab exhibited a good ear swelling response, comparable with that of positive control animals, whereas mice pretreated with a combination of anti-MIP-1{alpha} and anti-MIP-1ß Abs before hapten application showed a modest, but significant, 19% inhibition of the contact hypersensitivity reaction elicited by ear lobe challenge (Table IIGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Effect of neutralizing anti-chemokine Abs administered before sensitzation on the subsequent elicitation of contact hypersensitivity1

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A considerable body of in vitro and in vivo data highlights the role of chemokines in the regulation of leukocyte emigration from the vascular compartment to sites of inflammation (27). This chemokine regulation hinges upon the ability of these cytokines to induce affinity modulation of integrin adhesion molecules expressed on leukocytes (4, 13, 27, 39) and upon the target cell specificity of the individual chemokines (27, 39, 40, 41). Like other leukocyte subpopulations, T lymphocytes appear to depend on chemokine-regulated mechanisms for recruitment across vascular endothelium to sites of inflammation (23, 27).

The present findings provide clear in vivo evidence for an association between the production of the ß-chemokines MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß and the recruitment of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes into peripheral lymph nodes during an immune response. In this model of contact hypersensitivity, T lymphocytes accumulated very rapidly within the nodes and were predominantly PCNA negative, thereby precluding any significant role for lymphocyte proliferation as an explanation for the 10-fold increase in T lymphocyte numbers observed during sensitization.

The notion of altered trafficking of leukocytes into lymph nodes during the induction of contact hypersensitivity was supported by the rapid decrease in T lymphocyte numbers in the peripheral blood coincident with their accumulation in the lymph nodes. In a similar fashion, a significant decrease in the PBL count coincident with accumulation of these cells in the lymph nodes was observed in mice that had received repeated i.p. injections of Corynebacterium granulosum (42).

Three-color flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood and draining lymph node cells suggested that both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets had migrated into the nodes. This finding is consistent with previous adoptive cell transfer studies indicating that both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte subsets are mediators of DNFB-induced contact hypersensitivity (30, 31). By contrast, after stimulation with purified protein derivative of tuberculin, the large increase in T cell traffic through lymph nodes during the recruitment phase was mostly due to CD4+ memory phenotype T lymphocytes (8).

During the induction of contact hypersensitivity, abundant MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß mRNA and protein expression in the draining lymph nodes was detected. The kinetics of the protein expression of MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß was coincident with the recruitment of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte subsets, suggesting a functional role for these chemokines in the regulation of T cell recruitment. Although both chemokines were produced as early as 4 h after repainting, there was a difference in the kinetics of expression, with MIP-1ß protein expression being maximal at 4 h following DNFB repainting and persisting at high levels beyond 96 h, which was earlier and more prolonged than the expression of MIP-1{alpha}. Chemokine expression in the lymph nodes was not examined at time points in between the first and second paintings with DNFB; however, given the rapid kinetics of mRNA expression, it is likely that some induction of chemokine gene expression occurs before the second painting.

The prominent expression of the protein, but not mRNA, of MIP-1ß by endothelial cells in the DNFB-sensitized lymph nodes suggests translocation of this chemokine protein. This may occur via the recently described transendothelial chemokine transport mechanism (43), following initial synthesis by mast cells and macrophages in the nodes. In addition, the protein may be immobilized by proteoglycans on the surface of the endothelial cells to facilitate interaction with circulating lymphocytes (25, 44).

The kinetics and magnitude of lymphocyte accumulation in the regional lymph nodes demonstrated following Ag challenge in this study were very similar to previously published reports (8, 9, 42). Although prior studies have indicated the involvement of draining lymph nodes in both the sensitization and elicitation phases of DNFB-induced contact hypersensitivity (30, 31, 32, 33), there are no reports on the histologic changes in the lymph nodes in this model. At the early time points, the nodes showed marked expansion of the subcapsular and medullary sinuses, which were filled with a large number of cells, predominantly lymphocytes, macrophages, and mast cells. This extensive expansion of the sinuses may reflect an increased flow of lymph and inflammatory cells from the skin via the afferent lymphatic vessels into the draining nodes. At later time points, increased activity of germinal centers was visible in some nodes, indicating a proliferative response to the Ag.

The significance of MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß in this model was further confirmed by substantial inhibition of T lymphocyte recruitment into draining lymph nodes following administration of either anti-MIP-1{alpha} or anti-MIP-1ß Abs. The reported preferential activity of these chemokines on CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocyte subset was not observed, as the accumulation of both T cell subsets was similarly inhibited by either anti-MIP-1{alpha} or anti-MIP-1ß Abs. However, the combination of both Abs produced a significantly greater reduction in CD8+ (p < 0.05) than CD4+ T lymphocyte recruitment. This suggests that in CD4+ T lymphocytes the two chemokines may act via a receptor (such as CCR5) that binds both ligands, whereas in CD8+ T lymphocytes, additional receptors (such as CCR1, which is not responsive to MIP-1ß) may also be utilized (27).

Other recently identified ß-chemokines such as secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine (SLC) and EBI1-ligand chemokine (ELC) have been proposed to be relevant to T lymphocyte recruitment into lymphoid organs (40, 45). These chemokines are constitutively expressed in lymphoid tissues and are chemotactic for lymphocytes (45). However, there are no in vivo data regarding the function of these molecules. Nevertheless, it is likely that several chemokines, in addition to MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß, have the capacity to regulate both the homing of T lymphocytes in the physiologic state and the dramatically enhanced recruitment events that occur during the development of an immune response. This notion is consistent with the incomplete inhibition of T lymphocyte trafficking demonstrated in this contact hypersensitivity model.

Animals pretreated with a combination of anti-MIP-1{alpha} and anti-MIP-1ß Abs before hapten application showed a modest but significant 19% inhibition of the contact hypersensitivity reaction elicited by ear lobe challenge (Table IIGo). Therefore, pretreatment of animals with a combination of anti-MIP-1{alpha} and anti-MIP-1ß before hapten application not only significantly abrogates T cell recruitment to the draining nodes, but also partially blocks the subsequent delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. This finding suggests that mice injected with anti-MIP-1{alpha} and anti-MIP-1ß Abs followed by hapten application became partially tolerant to this hapten, perhaps as a result of decreased recruitment of hapten-primed T cells into the regional lymph nodes and thus a decrease in the expansion of hapten-specific T cells responsible for mounting a strong response upon subsequent challenge.

A striking finding in this work is the demonstration of mast cells as the predominant cellular source of MIP-1ß in the lymph nodes of DNFB-treated mice. These cells were distinctively located in the subcapsular and hilar regions of the nodes. Previous in vitro experiments have described the expression of MIP-1ß mRNA by mast cell lines (46, 47). However, the abundant expression of this chemokine by mast cells observed in this in vivo model of contact hypersensitivity is novel. The brisk appearance of mast cells in a distinctive location in the subcapsular and hilar regions of the nodes, in association with the decrease in their number in the affected skin shortly after repainting with DNFB, strongly suggests that mast cells travel from the skin via the afferent lymphatic system. As expected, mast cell accumulation in the draining nodes was unaffected by neutralization of MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß activity,4 indicating that movement of these cells into the nodes is independent of a concentration gradient of these chemokines. The novel observation of mast cells as the dominant source of MIP-1ß indicated in this work clarifies the controversy regarding the role of these cells in contact hypersensitivity (48, 49, 50, 51). In particular, mast cells are not only a source of histamine, serotonin, and other vasoactive amines that are believed to control vascular tone and permeability (52, 53), but also act as a key early regulator of T cell recruitment into draining lymph nodes.

These findings provide the first direct in vivo evidence of chemokine regulation of trafficking of T lymphocyte subpopulations into lymph nodes during the induction of an immune response. Mast cells accumulating in the nodes have been identified as the principal source of MIP-1ß in this model of contact hypersensitivity. Further studies examining additional chemokines and other models of immune response are warranted, as interventions to manipulate this chemokine-dependent T lymphocyte trafficking pathway may have profound influences on the outcome of host responses to infection or autoimmune triggers.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Ms. Angelina Enno for processing and cutting the histologic sections.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Andrew Lloyd, Inflammation Research Unit, School of Pathology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HEV, high endothelial venules; VLA, very late Ag; DNFB, 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; MCP, monocyte chemotactic protein; MMCP-5, mouse mast cell protease-5; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear Ag; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; R-PE, R-phycoerythrin. Back

Received for publication April 14, 1998. Accepted for publication July 13, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Gowans, J. L.. 1959. The recirculation of lymphocytes from blood to lymph in the rat. J. Physiol. 146:54.
  2. Abernethy, N. J, J. B. Hay. 1992. The recirculation of lymphocytes from blood to lymph: physiological considerations and molecular mechanisms. Lymphology 25:1.[Medline]
  3. Hay, J. B., B. B. Hobbs. 1977. The flow of blood to lymph nodes and its relation to lymphocyte traffic and the immune response. J. Exp. Med. 145:31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Springer, T. A.. 1995. Traffic signals on endothelium for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 57:827.[Medline]
  5. Mackay, C. R., W. G. Kempton, M. R. Brandon, R. N. P. Cahill. 1988. Lymphocyte subsets show marked differences in their distribution between blood and afferent and efferent lymph of peripheral lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med. 167:1755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cahill, R. N. P., D. C. Poskitt, H. Frost, Z. Trnka. 1977. Two distinct pools of recirculating T lymphocytes: Migratory characteristics of nodal and intestinal T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 145:420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hall, J., B. Morris. 1965. The immediate effect of antigens on the cell output of a lymph node. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 46:450.[Medline]
  8. Mackay, C. R., W. Marston, L. Dudler. 1992. Altered patterns of T cell migration through lymph nodes and skin following antigen challenge. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:2205.[Medline]
  9. Cahill, R. N. P., H. Frost, Z. Trnka. 1976. The effects of antigen on the migration of recirculating lymphocytes through single lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med. 143:870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lasky, L. A., M. S. Singer, D. Dowbenko, Y. Imai, W. J. Henzel, C. Grimley, C. Fennie. 1992. An endothelial ligand for L-selectin is a novel mucin-like molecule. Cell 69:927.[Medline]
  11. Baumheter, S., M. S. Singer, W. Henzel, S. Hemmerich, M. Renz, S. D. Rosen, L. A. Lasky. 1993. Binding of L-selectin to the vascular sialomucin CD34. Science 262:436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. de Fougerolles, A. R., S. A. Stacker, R. Schwarting, T. A. Springer. 1991. Characterization of ICAM-2 and evidence for a third counter-receptor for LFA-1. J. Exp. Med. 174:253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dustin, M. L., T. A. Springer. 1989. T-cell receptor cross-linking transiently stimulates adhesiveness through LFA-1. Nature 341:619.[Medline]
  14. Issekutz, T. B.. 1991. Inhibition of in vivo lymphocyte migration to inflammation and homing to lymphoid tissues by the TA-2 MoAb: a likely role for VLA-4 in vivo. J. Immunol. 147:4178.[Abstract]
  15. Gallatin, W. M., I. L. Weissman, E. C. Butcher. 1983. A cell-surface molecule involved in organ-specific homing of lymphocytes. Nature 304:30.[Medline]
  16. Hamann, A., D. Jablonski-Westrich, P. Jonas, H. G. Thiele. 1991. Homing receptors reexamined: mouse LECAM-1 (MEL-14 antigen) is involved in lymphocyte migration into gut-associated lymphoid tissue. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:2925.[Medline]
  17. Hamann, A., D. Jablonski-Westrich, A. Duijvestijn, E. C. Butcher, H. Baisch, R. Harder, H. G. Thiele. 1988. Evidence for an accessory role of LFA-1 in lymphocyte-high endothelium interaction during homing. J. Immunol. 140:693.[Abstract]
  18. Butcher, E. C.. 1991. Leukocyte-endothelial cell recognition: Three (or more) steps to specificity and diversity. Cell 67:1033.[Medline]
  19. Bargatze, R. F., M. A. Jutila, E. C. Butcher. 1995. Distinct roles of L-selectin and integrins {alpha}4 ß7 and LFA-1 in lymphocyte homing to Peyer’s patch-HEV in situ: the multistep model confirmed and refined. Immunity 3:99.[Medline]
  20. Giblin, P. A., S. T. Hwang, T. R. Kastumoto, S. D. Rosen. 1997. Ligation of L-selectin on T lymphocytes activates ß integrins and promote adhesion to fibronectin. J. Immunol. 159:3498.[Abstract]
  21. Hwang, S., T. Singer, M. S. P. A. Giblin, T. A. Yednock, K. B. Bacon, S. I. Simon, and S. D. Rosen. GlyCAM-1, a physiologic ligand for L-selectin, activates ß2 integrins on naive peripheral lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 184:1343.
  22. Warnock, R. A., S. Askari, E. C. Butcher, U. H. Von Andrian. 1998. Molecular mechanisms of lymphocyte homing to peripheral lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med. 187:205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bargatze, R. F., E. C. Butcher. 1993. Rapid G protein-regulated activation event in lymphocyte binding to high endothelial venules. J. Exp. Med. 178:367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Taub, D. D., K. Conlon, A. R. Lloyd, J. J. Oppenheim, D. J. Kelvin. 1993. Preferential migration of activated CD4 and CD8 T cells in response to MIP-1{alpha} and MIP-1ß. Science 260:355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Tanaka, Y., D. H. Adams, S. Hubscher, H. Hirano, U. Siebenlist, S. Shaw. 1993. T cell adhesion induced by proteoglycan-immobilized cytokine MIP-1ß. Nature 361:79.[Medline]
  26. Lloyd, A. R., J. J. Oppenheim, D. J. Kelvin, D. D. Taub. 1996. Chemokines regulate T cell adherence to recombinant adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix proteins. J. Immunol. 156:932.[Abstract]
  27. Adams, D. H., A. R. Lloyd. 1997. Chemokines: leucocyte recruitment and activation cytokines. Lancet 349:490.[Medline]
  28. Schall, T. J., K. Bacon, R. D. Camp, J. W. Kaspari, D. V. Goedell. 1993. Human macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha} (MIP-1{alpha}) and MIP-1ß chemokines attract distinct populations of lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 177:1821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Tedla, N., P. Palladinetti, M. Kelly, R. K. Kumar, N. DiGirolamo, B. Cooke, J. Dwyer, D. Wakefield, A. Lloyd. 1996. Chemokines and T lymphocyte recruitment to lymph nodes in HIV infection. Am. J. Pathol. 148:1367.[Abstract]
  30. Van Loveren, H. V., K. Kato, R. Meade, D. R. Green, M. Horowitz, W. Ptak, P. W. Askenase. 1984. Characterization of two different Ly-1+ T cell populations that mediate delayed-type hypersensitvity. J. Immunol. 133:2402.[Abstract]
  31. Gocinski, B. L., R. E. Tigelaar. 1990. Roles of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in murine contact sensitivity revealed by in vivo monoclonal antibody depletion. J. Immunol. 144:4121.[Abstract]
  32. Xu, H., N. A. Dilulio, R. L. Fairchild. 1996. T cell populations primed by hapten sensitization in contact sensitivity are distinguished by polarized patterns of cytokine production: interferon {gamma}-producing (Tc1) effector CD8+ T cells and interleukin (IL) 4/IL-10 producing (Th2) negative regulatory CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:1001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kurimoto, I., J. W. Streilein. 1993. Studies of contact hypersensitivity induction in mice with optimal sensitizing doses of hapten. J. Invest. Dermatol. 101:132.[Medline]
  34. Schnizlein, C. T., M. H. Kosco, A. K. Szakal, J. G. Tew. 1985. Follicular dendritic cells in suspension: identification, enrichment, and initial characterization indicating immune complex trapping and lack of adherence and phagocytic activity. J. Immunol. 134:1360.[Abstract]
  35. McNeil, H. P., D. P. Frenkel, K. F. Austen, D. S. Friend, R. L. Stevens. 1992. Translation and granule localization of mouse mast cell protease-5: immunodetection with specific antipeptide Ig. J. Immunol. 149:2466.[Abstract]
  36. Halasz, P., P. Martin. 1984. Microcomputer based system for semiautomatic analysis of histological sections. Proc. R. Microsc. Soc. 19:312.
  37. Riemann, H., A. Schwarz, S. Grabbe, Y. Aragane, T. A. Luger, M. Wysocka1, M. Kubin, G. Trinchieri, T. Schwarz. 1996. Neutralization of IL-12 in vivo prevents induction of contact hypersensitivity and induces hapten-specific tolerance. J. Immunol. 156:1799.[Abstract]
  38. Scheynius, A., R. L. Camp, E. Pure. 1996. Unresponsiveness to 2,4-dinitro-1-fluoro-benzene after treatment with monoclonal antibodies to leukocyte function-associated molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 during sensitization. J. Immunol. 156:1804.[Abstract]
  39. Campbell, J., J. J. Hedrick, A. Zlotnik, M. A. Sinai, D. A. Thompson, E. C. Butcher. 1998. Chemokines and the arrest of lymphocyte rolling under flow conditions. Science 279:381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Yoshida, R., M. Nagira, M. Kitaura, N. Imagawa, T. Imai, O. Toshie. 1998. Secondary lymphoid-tissue chemokine is a functional ligand for the CC chemokine receptor CCR7. J. Biol. Chem. 273:7118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Gunn, M., D. K. Tangemann, C. Tam, J. G. Cyster, R. D. Rosen, L. T. Williams. 1998. A chemokine expressed in lymphoid high endothelial venules promotes the adhesion and chemotaxis of naive T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Milas, L., I. Basic, H. D. Kogelymph Nodeik, H. R. Withers. 1975. Effects of Corynebacterium granulosum on weight and histology of lymphoid organs, response to mitogens, skin allografts and a syngeneic fibrosarcoma in mice. Cancer Res. 35:2365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Middleton, J., S. Neil, J. Wintle, I. Clark-Lewis, H. Moore, C. Lam, M. Aver, E. Hub, A. Rot. 1997. Transcytosis and surface presentation of IL-8 by venular endothelial cells. Cell 91:385.[Medline]
  44. Webb, L. M., M. U. Ehrengruber, I. Clark-Lewis, M. Baggiolini, A. Rot. 1993. Binding to heparan sulfate or heparin enhances neutrophil responses to IL-8. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:7158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Yoshie, O., T. Imai, H., and Nomiyama. 1997. Novel lymphocyte-specific chemokines and their receptors. J. Leukocyte Biol. 62:634.
  46. Burd, P. R., H. W. Rogers, J. R. Gordon, C. A. Martin, S. Jayaraman, S. D. Wilson, A. M. Dvorak, S. J. Galli, M. E. Dorf. 1989. Interleukin 3-dependent and -independent mast cells stimulated with IgE and antigen express multiple cytokines. J. Exp. Med. 170:245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Kulmburg, P. A., N. E. Huber, B. J. Scheer, M. Wrann, T. Baumruker. 1992. Immunoglobulin E plus antigen challenge induces a novel intercrine/chemokine in mouse mast cells. J. Exp. Med. 176:1773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Van Loveren, H., R. Meade, P. W. Askenase. 1983. An early component of delayed-type hypersensitivity mediated by T cells and mast cells. J. Exp. Med. 157:1604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Mekori, Y. A., S. J. Galli. 1985. Undiminished immunologic tolerance to contact sensitivity in mast cell deficient W/Wv and S1/S1d mice. J. Immunol. 135:879.[Abstract]
  50. Mekori, Y. A., J. C. Chang. 1987. The effect of IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation on the expression of contact sensitivity in the mouse. Cell. Immunol. 108:1.[Medline]
  51. Mekori, Y. A., G. L. Weitzman, S. J. Galli. 1985. Reevaluation of reserpine-induced suppression of contact sensitivity: evidence that reserpine interferes with T lymphocyte function independently of an effect on mast cells. J. Exp. Med. 162:1935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Gershon, R. K., P. W. Askenase, M. D. Gershon. 1975. Requirement for vasoactive amines for production of delayed type-hypersensitivity skin reactions. J. Exp. Med. 142:732.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Askenase, P. W., C. M. Metzler, R. K. Gershon. 1982. Localization of leucocytes in sites of delayed-type hypersensitivity and in lymph nodes: dependence on vasoactive amines. Immunology 47:239.[Medline]
  54. Wang, H.-W., N. Tedla, A. R. Lloyd, D. Wakefield, and H. P. McNeil. 1998. Mast cell activation and migration to lymph nodes during induction of an immune response in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 102, in press.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. K. Masouleh, G. B. Ten Dam, M. K. Wild, R. Seelige, J. van der Vlag, A. L. Rops, F. G. Echtermeyer, D. Vestweber, T. H. van Kuppevelt, L. Kiesel, et al.
Role of the Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan Syndecan-1 (CD138) in Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity
J. Immunol., April 15, 2009; 182(8): 4985 - 4993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Furuta, T. Kikuchi, Y. Iwakura, and N. Watanabe
Protective Roles of Mast Cells and Mast Cell-Derived TNF in Murine Malaria.
J. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 177(5): 3294 - 3302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
C. L. Willard-Mack
Normal Structure, Function, and Histology of Lymph Nodes
Toxicol Pathol, August 1, 2006; 34(5): 409 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
T. G. Diacovo, A. L. Blasius, T. W. Mak, M. Cella, and M. Colonna
Adhesive mechanisms governing interferon-producing cell recruitment into lymph nodes
J. Exp. Med., September 6, 2005; 202(5): 687 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J.-i. Kashiwakura, H. Yokoi, H. Saito, and Y. Okayama
T Cell Proliferation by Direct Cross-Talk between OX40 Ligand on Human Mast Cells and OX40 on Human T Cells: Comparison of Gene Expression Profiles between Human Tonsillar and Lung-Cultured Mast Cells
J. Immunol., October 15, 2004; 173(8): 5247 - 5257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
L. LaFranco-Scheuch, K. Abel, N. Makori, K. Rothaeusler, and C. J. Miller
High Beta-Chemokine Expression Levels in Lymphoid Tissues of Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Virus 89.6-Vaccinated Rhesus Macaques Are Associated with Uncontrolled Replication of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Challenge Inoculum
J. Virol., June 15, 2004; 78(12): 6399 - 6408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. C. Grimm, R. Newman, Z. Hassim, N. Cuan, S. J. Connor, Y. Le, J. M. Wang, J. J. Oppenheim, and A. R. Lloyd
Cutting Edge: Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Acts as a Potent Suppressor of Inflammation In Vivo by Trans-Deactivating Chemokine Receptors
J. Immunol., November 15, 2003; 171(10): 4990 - 4994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. B. Tanzola, M. Robbie-Ryan, C. A. Gutekunst, and M. A. Brown
Mast Cells Exert Effects Outside the Central Nervous System to Influence Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis Disease Course
J. Immunol., October 15, 2003; 171(8): 4385 - 4391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Helmby and R. K. Grencis
IFN-{gamma}-Independent Effects of IL-12 During Intestinal Nematode Infection
J. Immunol., October 1, 2003; 171(7): 3691 - 3696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C.-Y. Li, C.-S. Tsai, P.-C. Hsu, C.-T. Wu, C.-S. Wong, and S.-T. Ho
Dobutamine Modulates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1{alpha} and Interleukin-8 Production in Human Monocytes
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2003; 97(1): 210 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. E. Kohler, A. C. Caon, D. O. Willenborg, I. Clark-Lewis, and S. R. McColl
A Role for Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-3{alpha}/CC Chemokine Ligand 20 in Immune Priming During T Cell-Mediated Inflammation of the Central Nervous System
J. Immunol., June 15, 2003; 170(12): 6298 - 6306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
S. Nakae, Y. Komiyama, S. Narumi, K. Sudo, R. Horai, Y.-i. Tagawa, K. Sekikawa, K. Matsushima, M. Asano, and Y. Iwakura
IL-1-induced tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} elicits inflammatory cell infiltration in the skin by inducing IFN-{gamma}-inducible protein 10 in the elicitation phase of the contact hypersensitivity response
Int. Immunol., February 1, 2003; 15(2): 251 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. Nakajima, N. Inagaki, H. Tanaka, A. Tanaka, M. Yoshikawa, M. Tamari, K. Hasegawa, K. Matsumoto, H. Tachimoto, M. Ebisawa, et al.
Marked increase in CC chemokine gene expression in both human and mouse mast cell transcriptomes following Fcepsilon receptor I cross-linking: an interspecies comparison
Blood, December 1, 2002; 100(12): 3861 - 3868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. J. Wood, R. Sehmi, S. Dorman, Q. Hamid, M. K. Tulic, R. M. Watson, R. Foley, P. Wasi, J. A. Denburg, G. Gauvreau, et al.
Allergen-induced Increases in Bone Marrow T Lymphocytes and Interleukin-5 Expression in Subjects with Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2002; 166(6): 883 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. K. Park, D. Amichay, P. Love, E. Wick, F. Liao, A. Grinberg, R. L. Rabin, H. H. Zhang, S. Gebeyehu, T. M. Wright, et al.
The CXC Chemokine Murine Monokine Induced by IFN-{gamma} (CXC Chemokine Ligand 9) Is Made by APCs, Targets Lymphocytes Including Activated B Cells, and Supports Antibody Responses to a Bacterial Pathogen In Vivo
J. Immunol., August 1, 2002; 169(3): 1433 - 1443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. A. King, R. Anderson, and J. S. Marshall
Dengue Virus Selectively Induces Human Mast Cell Chemokine Production
J. Virol., July 17, 2002; 76(16): 8408 - 8419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
M. T. Borchers, T. Ansay, R. DeSalle, B. L. Daugherty, H. Shen, M. Metzger, N. A. Lee, and J. J. Lee
In vitro assessment of chemokine receptor-ligand interactions mediating mouse eosinophil migration
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2002; 71(6): 1033 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
E. A. Mellor, K. F. Austen, and J. A. Boyce
Cysteinyl Leukotrienes and Uridine Diphosphate Induce Cytokine Generation by Human Mast Cells Through an Interleukin 4-regulated Pathway that Is Inhibited by Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists
J. Exp. Med., March 4, 2002; 195(5): 583 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. M. Ebert and S. R. McColl
Up-Regulation of CCR5 and CCR6 on Distinct Subpopulations of Antigen-Activated CD4+ T Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., January 1, 2002; 168(1): 65 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
E. S. Baekkevold, T. Yamanaka, R. T. Palframan, H. S. Carlsen, F. P. Reinholt, U. H. von Andrian, P. Brandtzaeg, and G. Haraldsen
The Ccr7 Ligand ELC (Ccl19) Is Transcytosed in High Endothelial Venules and Mediates T Cell Recruitment
J. Exp. Med., May 7, 2001; 193(9): 1105 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Fiorentini, S. Licenziati, G. Alessandri, F. Castelli, S. Caligaris, M. Bonafede, M. Grassi, E. Garrafa, A. Balsari, A. Turano, et al.
CD11b Expression Identifies CD8+CD28+ T Lymphocytes with Phenotype and Function of Both Naive/Memory and Effector Cells
J. Immunol., January 15, 2001; 166(2): 900 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. P. Andrew, N. Ruffing, C. H. Kim, W. Miao, H. Heath, Y. Li, K. Murphy, J. J. Campbell, E. C. Butcher, and L. Wu
C-C Chemokine Receptor 4 Expression Defines a Major Subset of Circulating Nonintestinal Memory T Cells of Both Th1 and Th2 Potential
J. Immunol., January 1, 2001; 166(1): 103 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
X. Shang, B. Qiu, K. A. Frait, J. S. Hu, J. Sonstein, J. L. Curtis, B. Lu, C. Gerard, and S. W. Chensue
Chemokine Receptor 1 Knockout Abrogates Natural Killer Cell Recruitment and Impairs Type-1 Cytokines in Lymphoid Tissue during Pulmonary Granuloma Formation
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2000; 157(6): 2055 - 2063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
J. E. Gretz, C. C. Norbury, A. O. Anderson, A. E.I. Proudfoot, and S. Shaw
Lymph-Borne Chemokines and Other Low Molecular Weight Molecules Reach High Endothelial Venules via Specialized Conduits While a Functional Barrier Limits Access to the Lymphocyte Microenvironments in Lymph Node Cortex
J. Exp. Med., November 20, 2000; 192(10): 1425 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. S. Exton, A. Elfers, W.-Y. Jeong, D. F. Bull, J. Westermann, and M. Schedlowski
Conditioned suppression of contact sensitivity is independent of sympathetic splenic innervation
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2000; 279(4): R1310 - R1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
T. C. Dawson, M. A. Beck, W. A. Kuziel, F. Henderson, and N. Maeda
Contrasting Effects of CCR5 and CCR2 Deficiency in the Pulmonary Inflammatory Response to Influenza A Virus
Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2000; 156(6): 1951 - 1959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. C. Lee, M. E. Brummet, S. Shahabuddin, T. G. Woodworth, S. N. Georas, K. M. Leiferman, S. C. Gilman, C. Stellato, R. P. Gladue, R. P. Schleimer, et al.
Cutaneous Injection of Human Subjects with Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1{alpha} Induces Significant Recruitment of Neutrophils and Monocytes
J. Immunol., March 15, 2000; 164(6): 3392 - 3401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
J. V. Stein, A. Rot, Y. Luo, M. Narasimhaswamy, H. Nakano, M. D. Gunn, A. Matsuzawa, E. J. Quackenbush, M. E. Dorf, and U. H. von Andrian
The Cc Chemokine Thymus-Derived Chemotactic Agent 4 (Tca-4, Secondary Lymphoid Tissue Chemokine, 6ckine, Exodus-2) Triggers Lymphocyte Function-Associated Antigen 1-Mediated Arrest of Rolling T Lymphocytes in Peripheral Lymph Node High Endothelial Venules
J. Exp. Med., January 3, 2000; 191(1): 61 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
G. H. Tesch, S. Maifert, A. Schwarting, B. J. Rollins, and V. R. Kelley
Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1-Dependent Leukocytic Infiltrates Are Responsible for Autoimmune Disease in Mrl-Faslpr Mice
J. Exp. Med., December 20, 1999; 190(12): 1813 - 1824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Yamagami, D. Miyazaki, S. J. Ono, and M. R. Dana
Differential Chemokine Gene Expression in Corneal Transplant Rejection
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 1999; 40(12): 2892 - 2897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
B. A. Zabel, W. W. Agace, J. J. Campbell, H. M. Heath, D. Parent, A. I. Roberts, E. C. Ebert, N. Kassam, S. Qin, M. Zovko, et al.
Human G Protein-Coupled Receptor Gpr-9-6/Cc Chemokine Receptor 9 Is Selectively Expressed on Intestinal Homing T Lymphocytes, Mucosal Lymphocytes, and Thymocytes and Is Required for Thymus-Expressed Chemokine-Mediated Chemotaxis
J. Exp. Med., November 1, 1999; 190(9): 1241 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Krzysiek, E. A. Lefevre, W. Zou, A. Foussat, J. Bernard, A. Portier, P. Galanaud, and Y. Richard
Antigen Receptor Engagement Selectively Induces Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1{alpha} (MIP-1{alpha}) and MIP-1{beta} Chemokine Production in Human B Cells
J. Immunol., April 15, 1999; 162(8): 4455 - 4463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tedla, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tedla, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS