|
|
||||||||
on One Cell Can Present IL-2 to IL-2Rß/
c on Another Cell to Augment IL-2 Signaling
Metabolism Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
augments IL-2 signaling. Although this is generally
believed to occur only when the three known components of IL-2R are
associated within a single cell membrane, we demonstrate here an
intercellular interaction. Cocultivation of cells individually
expressing chimerae incorporating the extracellular domain of IL-2R
alone with cells expressing chimerae of IL-2Rß alone permitted IL-2
dose-dependent oligomerization of the chimerae. Likewise, native
IL-2R
-bearing cells augmented the IL-2 proliferative response of ex
vivo large granular lymphocytic leukemia cells expressing
IL-2Rß/
c but lacking IL-2R
. In both cases, the
response was inhibitable by an Ab to IL-2R
. Intercellular
augmentation of cytokine effects, acting in trans, has
important implications for biology and medicine. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,
IL-2Rß, and IL-2R
(or
c) (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). These receptor
proteins are encoded by distinct and structurally unrelated genes
(6, 7, 8, 9, 10). The IL-2Rß chain is expressed constitutively in CD8
cytotoxic T cells but not in CD4 Th cells and is further induced upon T
cell activation (1, 4). The
c is expressed
constitutively in lymphoid cells (1, 4, 11). In contrast, IL-2R
is
expressed only upon activation (1, 2, 4). The IL-2Rß and
c together bind IL-2 with intermediate affinity
(10-9 M) (1, 2). IL-2Rß and
c, but not
IL-2R
, belong to the hematopoietin receptor superfamily of cytokine
receptors characterized by four conserved cysteines and the membrane
proximal sequence WSXWS (1, 2). Heterodimerization of the intracellular
regions of IL-2Rß and
c is sufficient to effect IL-2
signal transduction (12, 13). These receptors serve as intracellular
docking sites, respectively, for Jak1 and Jak3 tyrosine kinases (14, 15), which become juxtaposed and phosphorylated upon
IL-2Rß/
c receptor heterodimerization, leading
subsequently to the activation of STAT proteins 3 and 5 and ultimately
to transcriptional regulation (16, 17). IL-2R
has a molecular mass
of 55 kDa and contains only 13 cytosolic amino acids (2). While there
is no evidence that the IL-2R
subunit can independently generate
intracellular signals (2, 5), it appears that the formation of the
high-affinity IL-2R (10-11 M) is dependent on the
expression of IL-2R
.
Here, we present the results of experiments that suggest a novel role
for IL-2R
in supporting high-affinity interactions of IL-2 in
trans between cells that express one or two receptor
subunits. We observed this phenomenon initially in experiments
utilizing cells transfected with individual chimeric IL-2R molecules
and then extended the observations to studies of the proliferation of
nontransfected leukemic large granular lymphocytic
(LGL)2 cells and T
cells bearing native IL-2R components.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
YT and YTU14 were gifts of Y. Tagaya (National Cancer
Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD). YT1 was
a gift of W. Leonard (NIH). TF1ß was a gift of P.
Sondel (University of Wisconsin) and required IL-2 or
granulocyte-macrophage CSF for growth. CEM, HUT102, and MJ were
obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Jurkat T
Ag (Jurkat transfected with SV40 T Ag) cell line was a gift of G.
Crabtree (Stanford University, Stanford, CA). Kit225 K6 and
Kit225 IG3 are sublines of Kit225 as described (18). K6Trans is a
subline of Kit225 K6 expressing an intra-antibody to IL-2R
on a
tetracycline-inhibitable promoter (19). ATAC4 was a gift of R.
Kreitman (NIH). L3 was a gift of B. Azzarone (Institut
National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Hospital
Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France). MT1 was obtained from M. Tsudo
(Kyoto-Katsura Hospital, Japan). Cells were cultured in complete medium
(RPMI 1460 with 10% FCS plus Pen-Strep and glutamine).
Plasmids and plasmid construction
Leader sequence, extracellular and transmembrane domains of
IL-2R components, and TCR
cytoplasmic domain with stop codon were
amplified by PCR (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) using Pfu
polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with a Kozak consensus
sequence preceding the start site and Spe1 and
XbaI sites at 5' and 3' ends, respectively. TCR
cDNA was
a gift of A. Weissman (NIH). Other cDNAs were obtained by
RT-PCR. Chimeras of each IL-2R linked to TCR
were constructed by
sequential ligation in the pEFneo (gift of Y. Tagaya) expression
vector. pNF-AT-SX plasmid was a gift of G. R. Crabtree.
Oligomerization assay
Jurkat T Ag cells (107) were electroporated at 280
mV and 975 µFD (Bio-Rad GenePulser, Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA)
with 4 µg of the chimeric plasmid(s) along with a reporter plasmid
pNF-AT-SX as described (20). After 24 h, the cells were washed and
subsets of cells (
105) were plated in 96-well plates,
unmixed or mixed, and incubated at 37°C for an additional 16 h
in the presence of IL-2 (Hoffmann-LaRoche, Nutley, NJ) at
10-fold dilutions in 200 µl Xvivo10 (BioWhittaker, Walkersville,
MD) with glutamine. After stimulation, 90 µl (X2) of
heat-treated supernatants (68°C, 1 h) were assayed for secreted
alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) activity by addition of an equal volume of
1 mM 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in 2
M diethanolamine buffer (pH 10) and incubation at 37°C for several
hours. Fluorescence was determined in duplicate with a Wallac Victor
Multilabel Counter (Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD) and/or Titertek
FloroskanII (Labsystems, Franklin, MA) at 355 nm excitation and
460 nm emission.
LGL purification
LGL expressing IL-2Rß/
c, but not IL-2R
, were
obtained from peripheral blood of a patient with T-LGL leukemia. LGL
were purified with lymphocyte separation medium (LSM) (ICN
Biochemicals, Costa Mesa, CA), and some LSM-purified cells were
further purified by negative selection of CD4-, CD14-, and
CD19-expressing cells using Ab-coated beads (Miltenyi Biotech,
Sunnyvale, CA) and magnetic separation (MACS). The purified LGL
expressed CD8, CD16, CD57, CD122, and
C, but not CD4 or
CD25 (fluorochrome-conjugated Abs from Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville,
MD) by flow cytometry (FACSort). The mixed population of
irradiated IL-2R
-bearing Kit225-IG3 and T-LGL cells showing
augmented proliferation were stained simultaneously with
fluoresceinated anti-CD57 and phycoerythrin-labeled anti-CD25
after 96 h of cocultivation.
Proliferation assay
Purified LGLs (105) were added to irradiated cell
lines Kit225 IG3 or YTU14 (1.252.5 x 105 cells;
1000 rad, Gammacell 1000, 137Cs source, Nordion, Ontario,
Canada) in Xvivo20 (BioWhittaker) in 96-well plates and
stimulated with various concentrations of IL-2. Anti-Tac
(anti-IL-2R
) mAb was added at 10 µg/ml. Cells were pulsed with
[3H]thymidine (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) on
the third day of culture and harvested 16 h later (Tomtec 96-well
harvester; Wallac, Turku, Finland). ß emission was counted
(1205 Betaplate liquid scintillation counter; Wallac).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/TCR
chimera on one cell
interacts intercellularly with IL-2Rß/TCR
chimera on another cell
We wished to define the interactions among the three IL-2R
subunits involved in the transduction of the IL-2 signal. To this end,
DNA constructs of each of the three IL-2R subunits were generated in
which the portions of the genes encoding the extracellular and
transmembrane domains of each IL-2R subunit were linked individually to
the cytoplasmic domain of the TCR
chain (20, 21, 22, 23). These transiently
transfected constructs, designated "
," "ß
," and
"
," enabled study of the oligomerization of the subunits
alone and in combination with each other both in the presence and
absence of IL-2. To measure TCR
chain oligomerization, the Jurkat T
Ag cells (Jurkat cells stably transfected with the SV40 T Ag) were
cotransfected with the pNF-AT-SX reporter plasmid, which directs
synthesis of SEAP under the control of a NF-AT-responsive promoter
element (20). SEAP was quantitated by its ability to convert a
fluorescent substrate. Using this system, the oligomerization response
of TCR
-signaling chimeras was comparable to that seen with
anti-CD3 Ab cross-linking in the Jurkat T Ag cell line. Flow
cytometric (FACS) analysis confirmed the cell surface expression of
transfected 
and ß
chimeras (data not shown), while 
expression was not detectable by FACS but was inferred as noted below.
As shown in Fig. 1
, ß
, when
transiently transfected either alone or together with 
, gave no
oligomerization response even in the presence of IL-2, suggesting that
the interaction of ß
and 
involves dimerization only. Using
an identical signaling and reporter system, Spencer et al. showed that
dimerization of the
cytoplasmic domain was not sufficient for the
generation of reporter SEAP; rather oligomerization was required (20).
The 
construct alone also showed no alteration of its
oligomerization signal following IL-2 addition, although its baseline
signal is greater than that observed with the other two subunits. We
believe that this higher baseline represents spontaneous
cytokine-independent IL-2R
oligomerization. When the 
and
ß
(±
) constructs were transfected into the same group of
cells, this spontaneous IL-2-independent IL-2R
oligomerization was
reduced; however, IL-2 dose-dependent oligomerization was observed
(Fig. 1
).
|

alone and ß
(±
)-expressing cell
populations that individually showed no IL-2 response were cocultured,
IL-2 dose-dependent oligomerization was also observed, suggesting an
intercellular interaction of IL-2-bridged receptor subunits in
trans between 
and ß
(±
) receptor
components that were expressed on different cells. The addition of IL-2
at picomolar levels led to an oligomerization response of 
transfectant cells cocultured with ß
plus 
cotransfected
cells. A 10-fold higher dose was necessary for oligomerization in the
absence of 
, suggesting the presence of transfected 
in the
high-affinity interaction (Fig. 1
on spontaneous 
oligomerization when both are expressed
in the same cell.
The IL-2 induced oligomerization response, both occurring when 
and ß
were cotransfected in a single cell population and when

and ß
were individually transfected into different cell
populations and then mixed, was largely inhibited by the addition of
the anti-Tac Ab that blocks the binding of IL-2 to IL-2R
(Fig. 2
). The monomeric anti-Tac Fab
promoted greater inhibition. The intact Ab, while blocking the binding
of IL-2 to IL-2R
, may also promote weak oligomerization of the
IL-2R
construct by virtue of its dimeric structure. While the
anti-Tac Ab blocks IL-2-induced hetero-oligomerization of 
and ß
, it does not inhibit the spontaneous homoassociation of

subunits, an association which does not involve the interaction
of IL-2 with its receptor. A murine isotype control Ab, UPC10, did not
block the oligomerization response (not shown).
|

and ß
transfectants
contributed to the intercellular oligomerization signal. The total
amplitude and dose-related difference in amplitude of signal indicate
that both 
and ß
contribute to the response and that their
responses to IL-2 over their respective baseline values are similar
(Fig. 3
chimera-bearing
cells also exhibited IL-2 dose-dependent oligomerization associated
with intercellular interaction when mixed with Jurkat T Ag cells
transfected with a wild-type IL-2R
construct (Fig. 4
chimera also interacted
intercellularly with expressed wild-type IL-2Rß construct (not
shown).
|
|
and IL-2Rß chimera interact
intercellularly with their naturally expressed counter-receptors on
human cells
In the presence of IL-2, an intercellular signal was also observed
when the ß
-transfected cells were cocultured with
IL-2R
-expressing cell lines such as Kit225 K6 (Figs. 4
and 5
B), ATAC4, L3, MT1, HUT-102,
MJ, and Kit225 IG3 (Table I
), but not
when 
cells were cocultured with these cell lines. In a parallel
observation, the 
chimera exhibited IL-2 dose-dependent
oligomerization when this transfectant was mixed with cell lines such
as YT, YT1, YTU14, and TF1ß, which express IL-2Rß and
c but little or no IL-2R
(Table II
), while the ß
chimera exhibited
no response to coculture with these cell lines in the presence of IL-2.
In control studies, the transfected 
or ß
expressing cells
did not respond by oligomerization following IL-2 addition when
cocultured with cell lines such as CEM and Jurkat T Ag, which do not
express IL-2R
or IL-2Rß (Table II
).
|
|
|
in the intercellular interaction was
also confirmed in experiments that utilized a subline of the T cell
leukemia cell line Kit225 K6 (K6Trans) that contained an intra-antibody
to IL-2R
. When this anti-IL-2R
Ab was activated, it reduced
the expression of native IL-2R
(19). Using this system, the
IL-2-induced oligomerization signal of comixed Jurkat T Ag cells
expressing ß
was present when IL-2R
was expressed on K6Trans
(Fig. 6
expression was inhibited following expression of the
intra-antibody (Fig. 6
was confirmed by FACS; data not shown.)
|
bridged
by IL-2 to chimeric IL-2Rß, or from the chimeric to the native
receptors, expressed on different cells was observed.
An irradiated T cell line bearing IL-2R
amplifies the IL-2
proliferative signal of IL-2Rß/
c-bearing leukemic LGL
cells
In the studies described above, at least one of the
receptor-paired cells examined expressed a chimeric receptor and
reporter construct. We have extended these observations to naturally
occurring cells expressing IL-2R subunits to determine whether cellular
transactivation by IL-2 can occur under more physiologic conditions. A
critical cellular element of these studies was an ex vivo leukemic T
cell-type LGL cell population (24) that expresses native IL-2Rß and
c but not IL-2R
. These T-LGL leukemic cells responded
to intermediate doses of IL-2 by proliferation. In accord with the
bridging action of IL-2 described above, the leukemic cells responded
to previously substimulatory concentrations of IL-2 when cocultured
with irradiated nonproliferating Kit225 IG3 cells that expressed large
amounts of IL-2R
(Fig. 7
). This
amplification of IL-2 responsiveness at subnanomolar concentrations of
IL-2 by the IL-2R
negative, IL-2Rß/
c expressing
leukemic cells when cocultured with irradiated Kit225 cells was largely
abolished by the addition of an anti-IL-2R
Ab, anti-Tac,
which blocks IL-2 binding to IL-2R
. Although most of the experiments
were performed with LGLs that were approximately 90% pure (i.e., CD8
expressing) after Ficoll separation, the same results were obtained
using Ficoll-purified LGLs further depleted of CD4-, CD14-, and
CD19-expressing cells by MACS separation with magnetic beads bearing
these Abs to yield a purity of 97%.
|
expression was not induced on the IL-2Rß/
c
expressing T-LGL leukemic cells when they were cultured with IL-2 alone
or when cocultured with both IL-2 and irradiated Kit225 cells. In
particular, following this coculture the CD57-expressing T-LGL leukemic
cells did not express IL-2R
(Fig. 8
-nonexpressing
YTU14 cells for the IL-2R
-expressing Kit225 IG3 cells (Fig. 9
|
|
|
chain on irradiated Kit225 interacts with
IL-2 molecules that in turn bind to IL-2Rß/
c chains on
the cocultured T-LGL. This interaction leads to the oligomerization of
the latter cells IL-2Rß/
c-receptor subunits, which
in turn is associated with augmented proliferation. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
on
one cell with IL-2Rß/
c expressed on another cell.
Furthermore, IL-2R
on one cell appears to present the IL-2 molecule
to IL-2R
-/IL-2Rß+
/
c+ receptor-bearing cells in an interaction
that yields a high-affinity IL-2 response and thus an amplification of
the proliferative signal of IL-2. This phenomenon may have important in
vivo physiologic relevance in terms of dissemination of a program of T
cell activation in which Ag-activated T cells augment the proliferation
and differentiation of bystander cytotoxic T cells as well as NK cells
that constitutively express IL-2Rß/
c but not IL-2R
.
Resting granulocytes (25, 26, 27, 28) and monocytes (29, 30) also bear
IL-2Rß/
c but not IL-2R
, which raises the
possibility that activated IL-2R
-bearing cells might amplify a
program of adherence, cytokine production, or receptor up-regulation in
phagocytes at low concentrations of IL-2 that would not otherwise
produce such effects. This amplification mechanism may also be involved
in the vascular leak syndrome associated with IL-2 administration and
neutrophil adhesion (31). In addition, such interactions of activated T
cells or other IL-2R
-bearing cells, whether normal or malignant,
might mediate effects specific to the IL-2R system in diverse cells
(32, 33) by this mechanism relatively unconstrained by HLA or TCR
recognition. Thus, intercellular activation in the IL-2 cytokine system
might have far-reaching implications in cancer and autoimmune disease.
The present observations with IL-2 and its receptor may be relevant to
other heterodimeric or heterotrimeric cytokine systems. For example,
IL-15R
is known to form a high-affinity signaling complex with
IL-2Rß/
c (34, 35, 36). Thus, it is conceivable that
IL-15R
may similarly present IL-15 in an intercellular fashion to
the IL-2Rß/
c receptor expressed on neighboring cells.
These observations may prompt a search for more "
"-type
components of cytokine receptor systems that serve critical
amplification and bridging functions in addition to or in lieu of
intracellular receptor-signaling functions.
In our chimeric system, the quality of the interaction between IL-2R
and IL-2Rß extracellular domains is notably different in one respect
when the single cell, cotransfectant model is compared with the
intercellular model. That difference relates to the fact that
spontaneous IL-2-independent 
oligomerization is noted as a high
baseline signal when ß
is present on a neighboring cell, but is
interfered with when ß
is present on the same cell. We have also
found that spontaneous oligomerization of 
appears to require the
juxtamembrane region of the IL-2R
molecule (D.M.E. and T.A.W.,
unpublished observations), while it is known that IL-2 binds close to
the N-terminus of IL-2R
(37). These findings support the idea that
the presumed antiparallel orientation of IL-2R
to IL-2Rß in the
intercellular interaction prevents interference by IL-2Rß with the
spontaneous oligomerization of IL-2R
as occurs in the parallel
orientation. Perhaps juxtamembrane motifs of receptors and their
associated molecules may control whether such receptors will act
intercellularly or merely contiguously within a single membrane.
Receptor aggregation is a common theme in immune system function.
The primary example of receptor clustering is the TCR (38), but the
phenomenon of aggregation-mediated cell activation probably encompasses
many other important immune system proteins (39) such as that observed
with CD4 and CD8 with their MHC class II and I counterparts,
respectively; CD28 or CTLA-4 with the B7.1 and B7.2 (CD80, CD86)
family, as well as CD40, Fas (40), CD30, and their ligands. These
receptor-counter-receptor pairs are examples of molecules transmitting
information from one cell to another. In the case of the TCR and MHC, a
third molecule, peptide Ag, participates in the interaction and
determines specificity. We suggest here that the IL-2R complex also
sends signals by clustering. The analogy with the TCR is even more
striking in that we have shown that IL-2R
on one cell can present
IL-2 in trans to IL-2Rß/
c expressed on
another cell to augment IL-2 signaling. In the case of IL-2R, the IL-2
molecule itself acts as a peptide linking the two cells by its
receptors, thereby determining the specificity of the interaction
between activated cells expressing oligomerized IL-2R
and other
often quiescent cells (T lymphocytes, NK cells, granulocytes, and
monocytes) expressing IL-2Rß/
c.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: LGL, large granular lymphocytic; NF-AT, NF of activated T cells; SEAP, secreted alkaline phosphatase. ![]()
Received for publication March 13, 1998. Accepted for publication July 9, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ß chain cDNAs. Science 244:551.
chain of the human IL-2 receptor. Science 257:379.
chain expression on resting and activated lymphoid cells. J. Exp. Med. 180:241.
chains mediate the signal for T-cell proliferation. Nature 369:333.[Medline]
-chain cytoplasmic domains is required for signalling. Nature 369:330.[Medline]
chain: its role in the multiple cytokine receptor complexes and T cell development in XSCID. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:179.[Medline]
subunit alters the function of the IL-2Rß subunit to enhance IL-2 binding and signaling by mechanisms that do not require binding of IL-2 to IL-2R
subunit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:2165.
subunit of the
receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3137.
chain is sufficient to couple to receptor-associated signal transduction pathways. Cell 64:891.[Medline]
family proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:8905.
chain. Cell 68:889.[Medline]
production from human neutrophils by IL-2 via IL-2-Rß. J. Immunol. 150:1979.[Abstract]
chain on human neutrophils. Blood 84:3870.
c chain of the interleukin 2 receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:8353.
chain of the IL-2 receptor. EMBO J. 14:3654.[Medline]
chain and
close linkage of IL15RA and IL2RA genes. J. Biol. Chem.
270:29862.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Mortier, T. Woo, R. Advincula, S. Gozalo, and A. Ma IL-15R{alpha} chaperones IL-15 to stable dendritic cell membrane complexes that activate NK cells via trans presentation J. Exp. Med., May 12, 2008; 205(5): 1213 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. de Bakker, A. Bodnar, E. M. H. P. van Dijk, G. Vamosi, S. Damjanovich, T. A. Waldmann, N. F. van Hulst, A. Jenei, and M. F. Garcia-Parajo Nanometer-scale organization of the alpha subunits of the receptors for IL2 and IL15 in human T lymphoma cells J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2008; 121(5): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. von Bergwelt-Baildon, A. Popov, T. Saric, J. Chemnitz, S. Classen, M. S. Stoffel, F. Fiore, U. Roth, M. Beyer, S. Debey, et al. CD25 and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase are up-regulated by prostaglandin E2 and expressed by tumor-associated dendritic cells in vivo: additional mechanisms of T-cell inhibition Blood, July 1, 2006; 108(1): 228 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. E. Blachere, H. K. Morris, D. Braun, H. Saklani, J. P. Di Santo, R. B. Darnell, and M. L. Albert IL-2 Is Required for the Activation of Memory CD8+ T Cells via Antigen Cross-Presentation. J. Immunol., June 15, 2006; 176(12): 7288 - 7300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yajima, K. Yoshihara, K. Nakazato, S. Kumabe, S. Koyasu, S. Sad, H. Shen, H. Kuwano, and Y. Yoshikai IL-15 Regulates CD8+ T Cell Contraction during Primary Infection J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 507 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Burkett, R. Koka, M. Chien, S. Chai, D. L. Boone, and A. Ma Coordinate Expression and Trans Presentation of Interleukin (IL)-15R{alpha} and IL-15 Supports Natural Killer Cell and Memory CD8+ T Cell Homeostasis J. Exp. Med., October 4, 2004; 200(7): 825 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Rao, A. T. Girvin, T. Ciardelli, D. A. Lauffenburger, and K.D. Wittrup Interleukin-2 mutants with enhanced {alpha}-receptor subunit binding affinity Protein Eng. Des. Sel., December 1, 2003; 16(12): 1081 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Toomey, F. Gays, D. Foster, and C. G. Brooks Cytokine requirements for the growth and development of mouse NK cells in vitro J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2003; 74(2): 233 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Burkett, R. Koka, M. Chien, S. Chai, F. Chan, A. Ma, and D. L. Boone IL-15Ralpha expression on CD8+ T cells is dispensable for T cell memory PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4724 - 4729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. M. Campbell, G. Cook, S. E. Robertson, A. Fraser, K. S. Boyd, J. A. Gracie, and I. M. Franklin Suppression of IL-2-Induced T Cell Proliferation and Phosphorylation of STAT3 and STAT5 by Tumor-Derived TGF{{beta}} Is Reversed by IL-15 J. Immunol., July 1, 2001; 167(1): 553 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Eckenberg, J.-L. Moreau, O. Melnyk, and J. Theze IL-2R{beta} Agonist P1-30 Acts in Synergy with IL-2, IL-4, IL-9, and IL-15: Biological and Molecular Effects J. Immunol., October 15, 2000; 165(8): 4312 - 4318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |