|
|
||||||||
Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Unlike in animal models, it is not yet feasible to identify individuals who are in the earliest stages of an autoimmune disease process and begin prophylactic treatment. Indeed, individuals who are presenting the first clinical signs of an autoimmune disease, or who are determined to be at high risk of developing autoimmune disease based on autoantibody screening, are likely to already have an advanced autoimmune disease process. However, autoantigen-based immunotherapies are generally less effective when administered later in the disease process (20, 21). Furthermore, while early treatment of young prediabetic nonobese diabetic (NOD)3 mice with several different ß cell autoantigens (ßCAAs) effectively reduces the long-term incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), these treatments greatly vary in their ability to inhibit the destruction of transplanted syngeneic islets in diabetic NOD mice (12). The basis for the varying efficacy of different ßCAA treatments at later stages of the disease process is an open question.
Notably, the frequency of autoreactive Th1 cells which arise against different ßCAAs in NOD mice varies considerably ( (5, 9) and below), suggesting that the number of potentially ßCAA-reactive T cells that are available for recruitment into the autoimmune response is inherently different for each target tissue Ag. Indeed, the number of naive or uncommitted Th0 ßCAA-reactive T cells should be unique for each ßCAA, depending in part on 1) the emigration of new precursors from the thymus; 2) the induction of peripheral tolerance as the T cells encounter their cognate Ag in the periphery; and 3) in autoimmune states, the degree to which these T cells have been recruited into the autoimmune response. Accordingly, the degree to which autoantigen-based immunotherapy can induce regulatory responses should depend in part on the administered Ag and the stage of the disease process. However, this prediction has not been tested despite its potential relevance to the rational design of immunotherapeutics.
To develop an understanding of how the ability of Ag-based immunotherapy to elicit regulatory responses is affected by autoimmune disease progression and to determine what treatment strategies can best induce regulatory responses late in a disease process, we examined the immunologic impact of Ag-based immunotherapies at different stages of the disease process in NOD mice.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NOD mice (Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY) were bred under
specific pathogen-free conditions. Newborn mice were treated on day one
and three with 200 µg of control or ßCAAs i.p. in 50% IFA (Life
Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Six-week-old and newly hyperglycemic
animals (
18 wk in age, with blood glucose >250 mg/dl) received 200
µg of control or ßCAAs i.p. in 50% IFA, and again 10 days later.
Splenic T cells from mice treated neonatally and at 6 wk in age were
analyzed by ELISPOT when the mice reached 12 wk in age. Splenic T cells
from mice that were treated at the onset of hyperglycemia (that
remained outwardly healthy and were not treated with insulin) were
analyzed 45 wk after the initial treatment. Only female mice were
used in these studies.
Antigens
Mouse glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and control Escherichia coli ß-galactosidase were purified as previously described (2). The immunodominant heat shock peptide 277 (HSP) has been described elsewhere (20). Insulin B chain, which contains insulins immunodominant determinant (22, 23), was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
ELISPOT
Splenic T cells were isolated from individual ß-gal- and
ßCAA-treated mice, as well as from unmanipulated aged-matched NOD
mice, and the frequency of Ag-specific T cells secreting IFN-
, IL-4,
and IL-5 was determined using a modified ELISA spot technique (5, 24).
Briefly, 106 splenic mononuclear cells were added per
well (in triplicate) of an ELISPOT plate (Millipore, Bedford,
MA) that had been coated with cytokine capture Abs and incubated
with peptide (20 µM) or whole protein (100 µg/ml) 24 h for
IFN-
, or 40 h for IL-4 and IL-5 detection. After washing,
biotinylated detection Abs were added, and the plates were incubated at
4°C overnight. Bound secondary Abs were visualized using
HRP-streptavidin (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole.
Abs R4-6A2/XMG 1.2-biotin, 11B11/BVD6-24G2-biotin, and
TRFK5/TRFK4-biotin (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) were used for capture
and detection of IFN-
, IL-4, and IL-5, respectively.
Autoantibody characterization
Sera were collected at the time of sacrifice, and the isotype of GAD autoantibodies was characterized using an ELISA assay as previously described (5). Briefly, GAD (BioSyn, Stockholm, Sweden) was bound to 96-well plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) at 10 µg/ml in 0.1 M NaHCO3 (pH 8.5) at 4°C overnight. The wells were rinsed with PBS and then blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 h. Mouse sera were added (0.1 ml of a 1/500 dilution) and incubated 1 h at 37°C. Following washing, bound Ig was characterized using affinity-purified HRP-coupled goat anti-mouse IgG+A+M (H+L) (Pierce, Rockford, IL) or HRP-coupled goat anti-mouse isotype-specific Abs for IgG1 and IgG2a (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL) and ABTS. Sera from untreated BALB/c and AKR mice were used as negative controls.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is unknown whether the gradual expansion of the proinflammatory
autoimmune response during disease progression in NOD mice affects
their ability to respond to foreign Ags. Since the cascade of
spontaneous autoreactive T cell responses is limited to target tissue
Ags (5), we surmised that the disease process should have little impact
on T cell immunity to nontarget tissue Ags. To test this supposition,
NOD mice were treated neonatally, at 6 wk in age, or at the onset of
hyperglycemia, with a control foreign Ag (ß-gal or a hen egg lysozyme
peptide (HEL1125)) in IFA, an adjuvant that promotes
vigorous Th2-biased responses (24). The mice developed polarized Th2
responses to the injected Ag; i.e., only IL-4- and IL-5- (and no
IFN-
-) secreting T cells were detected. Notably, the magnitude of
the Th2 response to the injected foreign Ag was similar, regardless of
at what stage of the disease process the NOD were immunized with the Ag
(Fig. 1
). Thus, the ability of NOD mice
to mount Th2 responses to foreign Ags is not affected by the initiation
or the progression of their spontaneous autoimmune disease process.
|
Unmanipulated NOD mice did not display detectable spontaneous
Th2-type splenic T cell responses to ßCAAs at any age (see below). In
contrast, NOD mice treated with a ßCAA just after birth developed
vigorous Th2 responses to the injected autoantigen that, however,
varied in frequency depending on the administered ßCAA (Fig. 1
). When
treatment occurred shortly after the onset of insulitis at 6 wk in age,
Th2 responses to the injected ßCAA were about half as frequent as
those elicited following neonatal treatment. When treatment was further
delayed until the onset of hyperglycemia, the frequency of Th2 cells
responding to the injected ßCAA were only 32% and 10% of that which
was induced following neonatal treatment with GAD and HSP,
respectively. No detectable Th2 responses were elicited by insulin B
chain treatment at this late stage of the disease process. Thus,
ßCAAs vary in their ability to prime Th2 responses, and there is a
steady decline in their ability to induce Th2 responses with disease
progression. While it is possible that the reduction in detectable
primed Th2 responses is due to alterations in the migration and
distribution of ßCAA-reactive T cells with disease progression, we do
not favor this explanation since the response to non-target tissue Ags
was unaffected by the disease process.
Diminished Th2 spreading with disease progression
Early treatment with ßCAAs (at birth and at 6 wk in age) not
only induced Th2 immunity to the injected Ag, but also led to the
development of Th2 responses to other unrelated ßCAAs, creating an
amplificatory cascade of this antiinflammatory limb (Fig. 2
). Thus, treatment with GAD induced
GAD-specific Th2 responses and led to the development of Th2 immunity
to HSP and insulin. Similarly, early treatment with HSP led to the
development of Th2 immunity to GAD and insulin, and treatment with
insulin led to the development of Th2 responses to GAD and HSP. The Th2
immunity induced by ßCAA treatment did not spread to non-target
tissue self Ags, and primed Th2 responses to non-target tissue Ags did
not spread to ßCAAs (data not shown). Thus, the spreading of Th2
immunity was restricted to target tissue Ags.
|
Early, but not late, Ag treatment curtails the recruitment of autoreactive Th1 cells
Splenic T cells from unmanipulated NOD mice displayed pure
Th1-type spontaneous immune responses to ßCAAs at all stages of the
disease process, and the induction of Th2 immunity to nontarget tissue
Ags (ß-gal or HEL) at any age did not affect the development of these
spontaneous autoimmune responses (Fig. 3
,
and data not shown). However, early treatment with a ßCAA (at birth
or at 6 wk in age) inhibited the development of Th1-type reactivity to
the injected Ag (e.g., following treatment with GAD or HSP, Th1
responses to the injected Ag were about half of those in age-matched
ß-gal-treated mice). Furthermore, early ßCAA treatment also
inhibited the development of Th1-type reactivity to other uninjected
ßCAAs (Fig. 3
). Notably, early treatment with GAD (which promoted the
most extensive Th2 spreading; Fig. 2
) most effectively inhibited the
development of Th1-type reactivity against other ßCAAs. HSP treatment
(which induced less Th2 immunity) did not reduce Th1 reactivity to
other ßCAAs as effectively as GAD but was more effective than insulin
B chain treatment (which induced the least Th2 immunity). In contrast,
when ßCAA treatment was delayed until near to the onset of
hyperglycemia, it had little, or no, impact on Th1-type autoimmunity to
the injected Ag or to unrelated ßCAAs (Fig. 3
). Thus, early, but not
late, ßCAA treatment can broadly curtail the recruitment of
ßCAA-specific T cells into the autoreactive Th1 limb, presumably
through inducing Th2 bystander suppression of Th1 development and/or
guiding the development of uncommitted ßCAA-reactive T cells toward
the Th2 phenotype.
|
We next investigated to what extent Ag-based immunotherapy
affected the development of humoral autoimmune responses. All NOD mice
that were treated with a control Ag (ß-gal) had low levels of Abs to
GAD, regardless of the age at which they were treated. These Abs were
predominantly of the IgG2 isotype and were at similar levels to those
in unmanipulated NOD mice (data not shown). In contrast, mice treated
neonatally with GAD displayed high levels of GAD Abs. These Abs were
predominately of the IgG1 isotype (Fig. 4
), which is indicative of Th2 help (25).
As treatment was administered at later stages of the disease process,
the level of primed IgG1 Abs to GAD declined, paralleling the
attenuation of inducible Th2 cellular immunity with disease
progression. Notably, mice that had been treated neonatally or at 6 wk
in age with insulin B chain also displayed increased levels of IgG1 Abs
to GAD, consistent with the intermolecular spreading of Th2 immunity to
GAD. Late in the disease process, insulin B chain treatment did not
promote detectable Abs to GAD, as would be expected by the inability of
this treatment to induce Th2 immunity at this stage (Figs. 1
, 2
). Thus,
Ag-based immunotherapy can promote humoral autoimmune responses to
uninjected target tissue autoantigens, but this effect declines with
disease progression.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The observed higher frequency of spontaneous and inducible T cell responses to GAD compared with HSP and insulin may stem from their different patterns of expression and the extent to which tolerance has been induced to these Ags; GAD is not expressed in the thymus and only at low levels in a few peripheral tissues, while HSP and (pro-) insulin are expressed in the thymus (36) and are ubiquitous in the periphery. Other factors contributing to the differences in immune responses to ßCAAs may include 1) differences in positive selection of potentially reactive T cells; 2) Ir gene-dependent preferences in Ag presentation; and 3) the greater number of determinants within the larger whole GAD protein. However, there are clear differences between the immunogenicity of the HSP and insulin B chain peptides, and both these peptides are less immunogenic than GAD peptide 35 (5).
In addition, we show that the extent of an autoimmune disease process can have a profound impact on the degree to which regulatory responses can be primed to target tissue autoantigens. The early administration of ßCAAs (neonatally, or just after the onset of insulitis) induces vigorous Th2 responses to the injected ßCAA and broadly diverts the natural development of Th1-biased autoimmune responses to other ßCAAs toward the Th2 phenotype through Th2 spreading. While immune responses to foreign Ags are unaffected by the disease process in NOD mice, there is a progressive decline in the ability of each autoantigen to promote Th2 immunity with disease progression. Late in the disease process, some ßCAAs were still able to induce Th2 responses and Th2 spreading (although to a lesser extent), while other autoantigens could not. Accordingly, the ability of Ag treatment to modulate ßCAA-specific Th1/Th2 balances greatly declines with disease progression. The attenuation of inducible Th2 immunity to ßCAAs (but not to non-target tissue Ags) with disease progression is likely to reflect an exhaustion of naive ßCAA-reactive T cells as they are recruited into the spontaneous cascade of autoreactive Th1 responses. This reduction in primable Th2 responses suggests that the rate at which naive ßCAA-reactive T cells are spontaneously recruited and committed to the Th1-biased autoimmune response exceeds the rate at which they are replenished by the thymus or by regeneration in the periphery.
We previously demonstrated that Th2 spreading following neonatal autoantigen treatment can lead to the broad amplification of humoral immunity to uninjected target tissue autoantigens (5, 9). Here, we show that this amplification of humoral autoimmune responses declines as the autoantigen treatment is administered at later stages of the disease process, paralleling the attenuation of inducible Th2 responses with disease progression. Thus, with the diminution of primed Th2 help, the development of IgG1 responses to both injected and uninjected ßCAAs trailed off. Such diversification of humoral autoimmune responses after Ag-based immunotherapy could potentially lead to unforeseen pathologies. A sobering study recently observed that the induction of Th2 responses against an oligodendrocyte cell surface protein may exacerbate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis through an Ab-mediated mechanism (37). However, there is little additional evidence of autoantibodies exacerbating T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases, and the IgG1 autoantibodies induced in this study by Ag treatment are thought to be very inefficient in fixing complement and mediating Ab-dependent cell cytotoxicity. Indeed, the plethora of anti-ß cell autoantibodies associated with IDDM appear to be nonpathogenic, and high autoantibody levels (whether naturally occurring or induced by Ag-based immunotherapy) are actually associated with a lack of disease progression in NOD mice and man (12, 16, 38, 39, 40).
While early treatment with all of the ßCAAs used in this study has been shown to efficiently prevent disease in NOD mice, these BCAAs vary in their ability to prolong the survival of transplanted syngeneic ß cells in diabetic NOD mice (12). Notably, the ability of different autoantigens to induce Th2 immunity late in the disease process correlates with the extent to which their administration protects the transplanted islets. Furthermore, Sarvetnick and colleagues have recently shown that the protective effects of an IL-4 transgene that is expressed in the ß cells of NOD mice is dependent on the availability of a large population of naive T cells (41). These observations suggest that the spreading of Th2 immunity among naive target tissue Ag-reactive T cells may be an important mechanism underlying the efficacy of Ag-based immunotherapeutics. If another cell type other than Th2 cells actually mediates this protection, it is likely that this population will follow dynamics similar to those which we have observed for Th2 cells.
Prophylactic treatment during the earliest stages of human autoimmune diseases such as IDDM and multiple sclerosis is not yet feasible, making it crucial to develop therapeutics that are effective late in the disease process. Our findings suggest that treatment with target tissue Ags against which large, uncommitted T cell pools exist, may elicit more extensive regulatory responses. Accordingly, rare target tissue Ags, cryptic ßCAA determinants, or altered peptide ligands thereof may provide more effective Ags for immunotherapy late in an autoimmune disease process.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Daniel L. Kaufman, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1735. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: NOD, nonobese diabetic; ßCAA, ß cell autoantigen; IDDM, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; GAD, glutamic acid decarboxylase; HEL, hen egg lysozyme; HSP, heat shock protein; ß-gal, ß-galactosidase; SFC, spot-forming colonies; ELISPOT, enzyme-linked immunospot; HRP, horseradish peroxidase. ![]()
Received for publication March 26, 1998. Accepted for publication July 17, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
transcription. J. Clin. Invest. 95:628.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Tian, H. Dang, H. von Boehmer, E. Jaeckel, and D. L. Kaufman Transgenically Induced GAD Tolerance Curtails the Development of Early {beta}-Cell Autoreactivities but Causes the Subsequent Development of Supernormal Autoreactivities to Other {beta}-Cell Antigens Diabetes, December 1, 2009; 58(12): 2843 - 2850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tian and D. L. Kaufman Antigen-Based Therapy for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes, September 1, 2009; 58(9): 1939 - 1946. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Olcott, J. Tian, V. Walker, H. Dang, B. Middleton, L. Adorini, L. Washburn, and D. L. Kaufman Antigen-Based Therapies Using Ignored Determinants of {beta} Cell Antigens Can More Effectively Inhibit Late-Stage Autoimmune Disease in Diabetes-Prone Mice J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1991 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Seifarth, S. Pop, B. Liu, C. P. Wong, and R. Tisch More Stringent Conditions of Plasmid DNA Vaccination Are Required to Protect Grafted Versus Endogenous Islets in Nonobese Diabetic Mice J. Immunol., July 1, 2003; 171(1): 469 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Quintana, P. Carmi, and I. R. Cohen DNA Vaccination with Heat Shock Protein 60 Inhibits Cyclophosphamide-Accelerated Diabetes J. Immunol., November 15, 2002; 169(10): 6030 - 6035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Weaver Jr., B. Liu, and R. Tisch Plasmid DNAs Encoding Insulin and Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 65 Have Distinct Effects on the Progression of Autoimmune Diabetes in Nonobese Diabetic Mice J. Immunol., July 1, 2001; 167(1): 586 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Gallichan, B. Balasa, J. D. Davies, and N. Sarvetnick Pancreatic IL-4 Expression Results in Islet-Reactive Th2 Cells That Inhibit Diabetogenic Lymphocytes in the Nonobese Diabetic Mouse J. Immunol., August 1, 1999; 163(3): 1696 - 1703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Paas-Rozner, M. Sela, and E. Mozes The nature of the active suppression of responses associated with experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis by a dual altered peptide ligand administered by different routes PNAS, October 23, 2001; 98(22): 12642 - 12647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |