The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Korngold, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Korngold, R.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 161: 41-48.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Repertoire Analysis of CD8+ T Cell Responses to Minor Histocompatibility Antigens Involved in Graft-Versus-Host Disease1

Thea M. Friedman, Michael Gilbert, Constance Briggs and Robert Korngold2

Kimmel Cancer Institute, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Experimentally, lethal GVHD can be induced in MHC-matched strain combinations differing in expression of multiple minor histocompatibility Ags (miHA). Recently, the GVHD potential of C57BL/6By (B6) T cells in irradiated BALB.B (both H2b) and related CXB recombinant inbred strains of mice has been studied to determine the scope of the response to miHA in vivo and how it compared with CTL responses to immunodominant miHA in vitro. The GVHD response in these strain combinations appeared to be limited to a few Ags, yet there was no correlation of these miHA with that of in vitro CTL responses. To further investigate the role of CD8+ T cells in GVHD, we analyzed positively selected miHA-specific donor CD8+ thoracic duct lymphocytes (TDL) collected from irradiated BALB.B and CXBE mice, 5 to 6 days after transplantation of B6 T cells. Flow cytometric analysis of B6->BALB.B TDL did not indicate expansion of any particular TCR Vß family, whereas Vß10 and Vß14 families were significantly expanded in the B6->CXBE TDL. However, PCR-based complementarity-determining region 3 size spectratyping revealed overlapping involvement of donor Vß1, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 14 families in both BALB.B and CXBE recipients and unique utilization of the Vß4 family in BALB.B mice, suggesting oligoclonal T cell responses to a limited number of miHA. In addition, the injection of CD8+Vß14+ B6 T cells into irradiated BALB.B and CXBE mice induced lethal GVHD, confirming the involvement of miHA-specific T cells within an individual Vß family.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT)3 is an important therapy for the treatment of hematologic disorders such as leukemia and aplastic anemia (1). The principal complication of BMT is the development of T cell-mediated graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) (2, 3, 4, 5). Although the approach of depleting T cells from the donor marrow inoculum has been successful in minimizing the development of GVHD, most clinical studies have also reported an increased incidence of graft failure, opportunistic infection, and leukemic relapse (6). One possible means of reducing all of these risk factors would be to selectively deplete those T cells from the donor marrow that are responsible for inducing GVHD and to allow for residual T cells to support engraftment and/or decrease the occurrence of infection and leukemic relapse. Alternatively, donor T cells can be infused into BMT recipients at later times to lessen GVHD severity (7), but this process could also be optimized by selective depletion of T cells reactive to host alloantigens. With either of these approaches, selective depletion would be practical only if there were a limited repertoire of GVHD-inducing T cells.

Multiple minor histocompatibility Ags (miHA) play an important role in the induction of GVHD following MHC-matched allogeneic BMT (8, 9, 10, 11). MiHA are presented by MHC class I and class II molecules (9, 12), the former of which are recognized by CTL that can be generated in vitro by secondary stimulation of primed effector T cells (13). As an experimental system, the T cell response of C57BL/6By (B6) mice directed against miHA expressed by H2b-matched BALB.B mice has been thoroughly investigated. Despite estimated differences of more than 29 miHA loci between these two strains, it was found that the in vitro CTL response was directed to only a few immunodominant Ags (14). These BALB.B miHA were detected because of their differential expression in a panel of target cells from the CXBE, G, I, J and K recombinant inbred (RI) strain, generated from F1 crosses from an original B6 and BALB/c mating. The hierarchy of the in vitro B6 CTL reactivity indicated that CXBG and CXBK strains expressed first-order immunodominant miHA, whereas CXBE expressed second-order miHA which could stimulate a response only in the absence of the first-order Ags (14). However, GVHD studies involving the transplantation of B6 T cells and marrow into irradiated BALB.B and CXB RI strains indicated that the in vitro immunodominant miHA hierarchy did not correlate with GVHD potential (15). In contrast to strong GVHD responses observed in the BALB.B and CXBE strains, GVHD was not evident in the CXBG and CXBK recipients. An interstrain GVHD response analysis with the BALB.B and CXB RI strains suggested that a minimum of two distinct MHC class I-restricted miHA (or groups of miHA) could account for induction of disease in the parental B6->BALB.B combination, designated GVH-1 and GVH-2 (16). Consistent with the observed importance of MHC class I-restricted miHA, all positive B6 GVHD responses in the BALB.B and CXB RI strains were found to involve mediation by CD8+ T cells, most of which appeared to be dependent on CD4+ T cell help for their generation; in BALB.B mice, CD4+ T cells also independently caused a high level of lethal GVHD (17). Furthermore, a recent phenotypic study of the B6 CD4+ TCR Vß repertoire during the early development of GVHD in BALB.B and CXBE mice has given the first indication of involvement of a limited anti-host miHA response (18).

In the current investigation, we approached the more critical question of the nature and extent of the B6 CD8+ T cell GVHD response to miHA in the BALB.B and CXBE recipients. Positively selected miHA-specific T cell blasts were collected from the thoracic duct lymphocyte (TDL) pool of irradiated BALB.B and CXBE mice, 5 days after transplantation of host-primed B6 T cells. Initial flow cytometric phenotype analysis of the CD8+ T cells in the B6->BALB.B TDL did not suggest significant expansions in any TCR Vß family, whereas B6-> CXBE TDL displayed significant expansions of the Vß10 and Vß14 families.

TCR Vß repertoire complexity was further examined by the highly sensitive PCR-based complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) size spectratyping analysis, in which the bulk TCR sizes for any given Vß family of a control population exhibit a Gaussian distribution ladder of in-frame expressible bands separated by three bases (19, 20). A skewing of the normal size distribution, reflected by increased band intensity, is indicative of an expanded CDR3 size expression and suggests an oligoclonal T cell response (21). Characterization of the TCR Vß repertoire of the responding donor CD8+ T cells is the first step toward ultimate identification of the specific T cells involved in the GVHD response. By this approach, we have found that B6->BALB.B TDL T cells exhibited biased CDR3 size usage in the Vß1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 14 families, whereas B6-> CXBE TDL T cells exhibited overlapping usage of the Vß1, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 14 families. The Vß4 response appeared to be unique in recognition of miHA expressed only by BALB.B recipients. The implications of these findings are that GVHD in this model system seems to involve an oligoclonal response to a limited number of immunodominant miHA. Furthermore, these miHA appear capable of inducing T cell responses in both the CXBE RI and BALB.B parental strains, with no evidence of competitive inhibition as previously observed in vitro (14). In addition, CD8+Vß14+ B6 T cells displayed high GVHD potential upon transplantation into irradiated BALB.B and CXBE mice, supporting the involvement of T cells from an individual Vß family in the development of GVHD.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

C.B10-H2b/LiMcdJ (BALB.B), CXB-2/By (CXBE), and C57BL/6By (B6) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and/or raised in our breeding colony from breeder pairs provided by The Jackson Laboratory. For all experiments, sex-matched mice were used as donors and recipients between the ages of 7 and 16 wk. Mice were kept in a pathogen-free environment in autoclaved microisolator cages and were provided with acidified (pH 2.5) water and autoclaved food ad libitum.

Media

PBS (BioWhittaker, Walkerville, MD) supplemented with 0.1% BSA (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) was used for all in vitro manipulations of the donor bone marrow cells and lymphocytes. RPMI 1640 (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) supplemented with 10% FCS (Sigma), 2 mM L-glutamine (Mediatech), 50 IU/ml penicillin (Mediatech), 50 µg of streptomycin (Mediatech), and 5 IU/ml heparin sulfate (Schein Pharmaceutical, Florham Park, NJ) was used for TDL collection. PBS supplemented with 1% BSA and 0.1% NaN3 was used as a medium for staining cells for flow cytometry (FACS media). PBS alone and supplemented with 1% BSA was used during magnetic cell sorting.

Irradiation

Recipient mice received a lethal dose of whole body irradiation (825 cGy) from a Gammacell (Atomic Energy of Canada, Kanata, Ontario, Canada) 137Ce source at a dose rate of 116 cGy/min.

Monoclonal antibodies

Ascites fluid for anti-Thy-1.2 (J1j, rat IgM (22), anti-CD4 (RL172, rat IgM (23), and GK1.5, rat IgG (24)) mAb were used for cell preparations. Affinity-purified goat anti-mouse IgG (whole molecule) Ab was purchased from Cappel-Organon Teknika (Westchester, PA). For magnetic cell sorting and flow cytometric analyses, all mAb were purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA) and included FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5; no. 01064D) and anti-CD8 (clone 53-6.7; no. 01044D) mAb and biotinylated mAb specific for Vß2, 3, 4, 5.1/5.2, 6, 7, 8.1/8.2, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14.

Preparation of donor cells

Bone marrow cells were flushed from the femurs and tibias of B6 donor mice with PBS + 0.1% BSA and washed. To prepare anti-T cell-depleted bone marrow (ATBM), cells were incubated with J1j mAb (1:100 dilution of ascites fluid) and guinea pig C (1:30 dilution) in 6 ml of PBS + 0.1% BSA at 37°C for 50 min, and washed three times. ATBM was adjusted to 1.6 x 107 cells/ml in PBS for i.v. injection (0.1 ml) into recipients. T cell-enriched donor cells were prepared from pooled spleen and lymph node cell suspensions from appropriate BALB.B or CXBE primed and boosted B6 mice (i.p. injection of 1.5 x 107 spleen cells 2.5 wk apart). The cells were washed and resuspended in Gey’s balanced salt solution containing 0.7% NH4Cl to remove RBC. The cells were washed twice and filtered through a cell strainer to remove dead cells. B cells were removed by panning the cell suspension on goat anti-mouse IgG precoated plastic petri dishes for 1 h at 4°C, as previously described (16). The nonadherent (whole T cell enriched) cells were harvested. Cell purity was >85% positive for CD3 expression, as determined by flow cytometry. For induction of GVHD, whole T cells were depleted of CD4+ T cells by incubation with RL172 mAb (1:100 dilution of ascites fluid) and guinea pig C (1:30 dilution) in 6 ml of PBS + 0.1% BSA at 37°C for 50 min and washed three times. CD8+ enriched cells were incubated with either biotinylated or FITC-conjugated mAb specific for Vß14 in PBS for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were washed twice in PBS and incubated with MACS Magnetic streptavidin microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany) for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were washed twice, resuspended in PBS + 0.1% BSA, and positively selected by either fluorescent cell sorting using an EPICS ELITE flow cytometer (Coulter Electronics, Hialeah, FL) or the Vario MACS Column System (Miltenyi). CD8+Vß14+ T cells were washed twice and resuspended in PBS for i.v. injection. For the GVHD experiments with CXBE recipients, CD4+ T cells were not depleted from the donor cell populations.

GVHD assay

BALB.B or CXBE mice were lethally irradiated (825 cGy) and ~6 h later injected i.v. (in a volume of 0.5 ml of PBS) with the appropriate preparation of ATBM (2 x 106) alone or in conjunction with either TDL or the experimental cell preparation to be tested. Mice were checked daily for morbidity and mortality and weighed twice per week until the experiments were terminated. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed by the Wilcoxon nonparametric test.

Thoracic duct cannulation

Thoracic duct cannulation was used to obtain positively selected host miHA-specific T cells, as previously described (18, 25). BALB.B or CXBE mice (3–4 mice/group) were lethally irradiated (825 cGy) and injected i.v. 6 h later with unseparated T cells (1–1.5 x 107 cells in 0.25 ml of PBS) from host-primed donor B6 mice and were cannulated 5 days later. Briefly, mice were anesthetized by an i.p. injection of avertin (1:50 dilution in PBS of a stock solution of 10 g of tribromoethanol in 10 ml of tert-amyl alcohol; Aldrich Chemical, Milwaukee, WI), an i.v. saline line inserted in the tail, and a cannula (PE-50 intramedic tubing; Clay Adams, Parsipanny, NJ) surgically implanted into the thoracic duct. TDL were collected over a 20-h period and the cells pooled from individual mice of each group.

Flow cytometric analysis of TCR Vß expression

For fluorescent staining, cells were washed, resuspended in FACS medium, and incubated for 5 min at 4°C with culture supernatant containing anti-FcR{gamma}ll mAb (clone 2.4G2, HB197; American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD; (26)) to prevent nonspecific staining by mAb. An isotype-matched FITC-conjugated mAb was used as a negative control. TDL T cells were assayed for the percentage of Vß expressing CD8+ T cells by two-color flow cytometry. Cells were first incubated with each biotinylated anti-Vß mAb in combination with FITC-anti-CD8 mAb for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were then washed twice and incubated with PE-streptavidin (Caltag, San Francisco, CA) for 30 min at 4°C, washed twice, and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. Cells were analyzed on a EPICS C flow cytometer (Coulter Electronics). Data from individual replicate experiments were pooled, and statistical significance was determined by the Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon rank test.

Preparation of RNA and cDNA

CD8+ T cells were first prepared by depletion of CD4+ T cells via panning of TDL cell suspensions on GK1.5 mAb (1:20 dilution of ascites fluid in PBS + 0.1% BSA) precoated plastic petri dishes for 1 h at 4°C. This procedure yielded a restricted population with >=92% CD8+ cells. Total cellular RNA was then generated from 106 to 107 nonadherent CD8+ cells by homogenization in 1 ml of Ultraspec (Biotecx Laboratories, Houston, TX), separating cellular DNA and protein by the addition of a 1:5 volume of chloroform, vortexing for 5 s, and centrifuging at 12,500 rpm for 15 min. The aqueous phase was transferred to a clean Eppendorf tube, and RNA was precipitated at 4°C by adding an equal volume of isopropanol and centrifuging at 12,500 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed with 75% ethanol in diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) treated water and centrifuged, as above. The RNA pellet was resuspended in 25 µl of DEPC water, heated to 55–65°C for 10 min and stored at -20°C. Recovery of RNA was determined by spectrophotometry. The poly(A)+ portion of the total RNA was converted into cDNA using oligo(dT) as a primer for reverse transcription. Two micrograms of total RNA in a volume of 9.5 µl were heated to 70–80°C, centrifuged briefly, and placed on ice. Master mix (17.5 µl), containing 1 µl of RNasin (40 U/µl), 6 µl of 5x Maloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase reaction buffer, 3 µl of oligo(dT) primer (20 mM), 1.5 µl of deoxynucleotide triphosphates A, G, C, T (25 mM each), and 3 µl of Maloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (300 U/µl), was incubated at 37°C for 1.5 h to synthesize cDNA. All reagents were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). The reaction mixture was then heated to 95°C for 3 min, and the cDNA was stored at -20°C. PCR was performed using murine ß-actin primers to establish the quality of the cDNA.

PCR amplification of cDNA and CDR3 size spectratyping

PCR was performed using a labeled constant primer (Cßb) and a Vß primer specific for each Vß family to be analyzed. Cßb was labeled using polynucleotide kinase (Promega) and [{gamma}-32P]ATP (Dupont-NEN, Boston, MA). All the primers used have been previously described (27) with the exception of the Vß20 primer, which was designed with a sequence of GGTCAAGGAGAGATTCTCAGCTGT. Five microliters of 10x Taq polymerase buffer B (Promega) were added to 5 µl of cDNA plus 2 µl of MgCl2 (25 mM), 4 µl deoxynucleotide triphosphates A,G, C, T (25 mM each), 2.5 µl of Vß sense primer (20 µM), 4 µl Cßb labeled antisense primer (12 µM), 28 µl DEPC-treated water, and 1 µl of Taq polymerase (2–5 U/µl, Promega). Thirty cycles of amplification were conducted and on completion of PCR, 50 µl of 2x loading buffer containing 95% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.05% bromphenol blue,, and 0.05% Xylene Cyanol FF was added to each reaction. PCR reactions were either stored at -20°C or electrophoresed. Each reaction tube was heated to 70°C for 3 min, and 6 µl of each were applied to a prewarmed 6% acrylamide sequencing gel, as previously described (20). The gels were run at 55 mA for 1.5 h to maximize band resolution. Sequencing gels were dried, and autoradiography was generally performed for 15 h at room temperature without intensifying screens. Densitometric scanning of autoradiographs was performed on a Personal Densitometer SI using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). The interpretations of the spectratypes were based on the criteria previously established by Gorski et al. (19, 20). The relative band intensities within a given spectratype were examined and compared with the intensity patterns in the spectratype of the naive B6 control group. The other bands within a given spectratype act as the internal controls for any variability due to the PCR expansion or to different sample sizes.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
General approach

B6 T cells (1–1.5 x 107) were injected into irradiated (825 cGy) BALB.B and CXBE mice for induction of GVHD. It was necessary to use cells from donor mice that had been presensitized (primed and boosted by i.p. injection of 1.5 x 107 spleen cells) to the appropriate recipient type to generate any significant TCR Vß family expansion of the CD8+ T cell population within the first week posttransplantation. The recipients underwent thoracic duct cannulation on day 5, and TDL was collected over a 20-h period and pooled from three to four mice per group. The positively selected TDL were >95% CD3+ and consisted of 55 to 67% CD4+ and 33 to 45% CD8+ T cells. A significant percentage (20–25%) of the TDL were blast-like in size, in contrast to TDL collected from B6 mice transplanted with T cells (1–1.5 x 107) from syngeneic-presensitized B6 mice, which yielded few blast-like cells and were >98% CD4+. Therefore, the TCR Vß repertoire analyses of TDL CD8+ T cells from GVHD recipients were compared with the TCR Vß repertoire of normal B6 splenic CD8+ T cells.

TCR Vß repertoire analysis by flow cytometry

TCR Vß repertoire analysis was conducted by two-color flow cytometry of the TDL using a panel of anti-Vß mAb along with anti-CD8 mAb. Of the 13 Vß families for which specific mAb were available, positively selected B6->BALB.B TDL did not display any significant Vß family expansion (Fig. 1Go). On the other hand, the B6->CXBE TDL exhibited significant expansions of the Vß10 (6.1% to 9.9%; p < 0.05) and Vß14 (3.3% to 6.8%; p < 0.05) families; and marginal expansion of the Vß11 family (8.7% to 11.8%; p > 0.05), relative to naive B6 splenic CD8+ T cells (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. TCR Vß repertoire analysis of positively selected B6->BALB.B and B6->CXBE CD8+ TDL. BALB.B and CXBE mice were lethally irradiated (825 cGy) and transplanted with 3 x 107 host-presensitized B6 donor T cells. Five days posttransplant, the animals were cannulated and TDL were collected and pooled for Vß analysis by two-color flow cytometry. The values for the BALB.B and CXBE recipients are the mean percentage ± SEM of Vß expression on CD8+ TDL T cells pooled from five and six replicate experiments, respectively. Naive splenic B6 T cells were analyzed to serve as baseline controls and are expressed as the mean values from the pool of four replicate experiments. Significant increases in Vß expression (p < 0.05) are indicated (*).

 
Induction of GVHD by B6->BALB.B TDL T cells

B6->BALB.B TDL T cells (1.4 x 107) were transplanted along with 2 x 106 ATBM into lethally irradiated (825 cGy) BALB.B or CXBE recipients to demonstrate that these cells were capable of inducing GVHD. Control recipients received an injection of 2 x 106 ATBM alone. By day 25, both the BALB.B and CXBE recipients exhibited the clinical symptoms of GVHD, including diarrhea, ruffled fur, and weight loss (>20%), compared with control ATBM mice (Fig. 2GoA). All of the BALB.B recipients of TDL succumbed by day 50 (MST of 30 days), more rapidly than the CXBE recipients which died by day 72 (MST of 50 days; Fig. 2GoB).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. GVHD induction following the adoptive transfer of positively selected B6->BALB.B TDL. Lethally irradiated (825 cGy) BALB.B and CXBE mice were adoptively transferred with 2 x 106 B6 ATBM alone or in a mixture with 1.4 x 107 B6->BALB.B TDL T cells (unseparated) collected on day 5 after injection of 3 x 107 BALB.B-presensitized B6 donor T cells. A, At each time indicated, the mean body weight for each recipient group (n = 5 for all groups, except TDL + ATBM->BALB.B; n = 4) was calculated and normalized as a percentage of the initial starting weight. B, The survival of transplanted recipients as described above. The results are from a representative of two similar experiments.

 
Molecular analysis of TCR

The CDR3 sequence encoding the variable ß-chain V-D-J junctional region defines the unique TCR clonotype(s) specific for a miHA and acts as a fingerprint for the T cell lineage(s) bearing it. PCR-based analysis, known as CDR3 size spectratyping (19, 20), was used to determine the nature of the Vß family repertoires observed in the B6->BALB.B and B6->CXBE CD8+ TDL, as a reflection of the initial GVHD response. The Vß bands of a spectratype from normal B6 splenic CD8+ T cells followed a Gaussian distribution (Fig. 3GoA), with the center bands of median CDR3 length being most intense and the outer bands of longer and shorter lengths being less intense. In contrast, the Vß band patterns of skewed spectratypes from TDL did not exhibit Gaussian distributions, with some bands being more intense relative to the same band distribution in the B6 control sample (exemplified in Fig. 3Go). The CDR3 size spectratypes of 17 Vß families expressed in B6 mice (Vß1-16 and Vß20) were examined for band skewing suggestive of an oligoclonal expansion of particular T cell lineages. The results (summarized in Table IGo) supported the findings of the phenotypic analysis; i.e., Vß6 exhibited biased CDR3 usage in the B6-> BALB.B CD8+ TDL and Vß6, Vß10, and Vß14 were skewed in the B6->CXBE CD8+ TDL (Fig. 3Go). In addition, the spectratype analysis indicated that both strain combinations exhibited skewing of bands in the Vß1, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 14 families. In all cases, the same CDR3 size band was enhanced in the same Vß family between the two groups (Fig. 3Go). However, in the Vß14 family, additional bands were enhanced in the B6-> BALB.B CD8+ TDL spectratype which were not skewed in the B6->CXBE CD8+. Most notably, biased CDR3 usage in the Vß4 family was unique to the B6->BALB.B CD8+ TDL, suggesting a response to a BALB.B-specific miHA.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Vß specific primers were used to generate PCR products from purified (lane 1) B6 naive splenic T cells, B6->CXBE (lane 2), and B6->BALB.B TDL RNA (lane 3). A, CDR3 size spectratyping analysis was performed as described in Materials and Methods. The results shown are the spectratypes of Vß10, 14, 4, and 5. B, Densitometric scanning of the gel films in A generated histograms to compare the size distribution of CDR3 bands between the B6 naive splenic T cells (histogram 1), and B6->CXBE (histogram 2) or B6->BALB.B TDL (histogram 3). Arrows indicate CDR3 bands that display increased relative intensities within the spectratype. Starred peaks in the Vß4 histograms are contaminants and not part of the spectratype.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Summary of TCR Vß utilization of CD8+ TDL from BALB.B and CXBE recipients as analyzed by CDR3 size spectratyping

 
Induction of GVHD by T cells from a single TCR Vß family

Fluorescent cell sorting was used to positively select CD8+Vß14+ T cells from CXBE-presensitized B6 mice which were then transplanted into irradiated (825 cGy) BALB.B recipients to demonstrate that cells from a single Vß family were capable of inducing GVHD. Recipients were injected with either the combination of 3 x 106 naive B6 CD4+ T cells (to provide Th function) and 2 x 106 ATBM alone or with either 4 x 106 CXBE-presensitized unseparated B6 CD8+T cells or 1 x 105 CD8+Vß14+-enriched T cells (>99% Vß14+). Recipients of either the unseparated or Vß14+CD8+ T cells exhibited the clinical symptoms of GVHD between days 45 and 50, including weight loss (22 and 30%, respectively; Fig. 4GoA). By day 76, 60% (MST of 49 days) of the BALB.B mice that received the unseparated CD8+ T cells and 80% (MST of 67 days) of those given the Vß14+CD8+ T cells had died, compared with 20% mortality in the ATBM control group (Fig. 4GoB). In a similar manner, lethally irradiated (825 cGy) CXBE mice were injected with 2 x 106 ATBM either alone or with either 3 x 107 CXBE-presensitized unseparated or 3.5 x 106 Vß14+ enriched (>84% Vß14+ selected by magnetic cell sorting) B6 T cells. Both groups of CXBE recipients that received T cells exhibited the clinical symptoms of GVHD by day 40, including weight loss (17 and 25%, respectively; Fig. 5GoA). By day 45, mice that received injections of Vß14+-enriched CD8+ T cells had 80% fatality (MST of 48 days), and by day 70, the mice that had been injected with unseparated CD8+ T cells had 40% fatality, as compared with 100% survival in the control ATBM group (Fig. 5GoB).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. GVHD induction following the injection of CXBE-presensitized B6 CD8+Vß14+ T cells into BALB.B mice. Lethally irradiated (825 cGy) BALB.B mice were injected with 3 x 106 naive B6 CD4+ T cells, 2 x 106 ATBM, and either 4 x 106 CXBE-presensitized B6 CD8+ T cells or 1 x 105 CD8+Vß14+ T cells. Control recipients received injections of B6 CD4+ and ATBM only. A, At each time point indicated, the mean body weight for each recipient group (n = 5) was calculated and normalized, as a percentage of the initial starting weight. B, The survival of transplanted recipients as described above.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. GVHD induction following the injection of CXBE-presensitized B6 Vß14+ T cells into CXBE mice. Lethally irradiated (825 cGy) CXBE mice were injected with 2 x 106 ATBM, and either 3 x 107 CXBE-presensitized unseparated B6 T cells or 3.5 x 106 Vß14+ T cells. Control recipients received injections of ATBM only. A, At each time point indicated, the mean body weight for each recipient group (n = 5) was calculated and normalized, as a percentage of the initial starting weight. B, The survival of transplanted recipients as described above.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The TCR Vß repertoires of positively selected TDL collected from presensitized B6->BALB.B and B6->CXBE transplanted mice were analyzed to gain insight into the CD8+ T cell populations that mediate GVHD directed against multiple miHA disparities. The TDL pool is an excellent site for monitoring T cell responses since recently activated T cells expand and enter the thoracic duct after initially encountering miHA in the spleen and lymph nodes. Highly viable (>=99%) cells can be retrieved from the TDL pool, containing significant levels of blast-like T cells, in contrast to retrieval of T cells from the peripheral lymphoid organs (28). Due to the overall low frequency responses involved in anti-miHA reactivity and the slower development of primary CD8+ T cell responses in vivo relative to CD4+ T cells, significant phenotypic skewing of Vß families was not detectable over a period of 3 to 8 days posttransplantation of naive B6 T cells, although significant skewing occurred in the CD4+ T cell population (18). The cannulation of mice at later time points was impractical, since the mice began developing GVHD-related symptoms and could not survive the procedure. As an alternative, anti-host miHA T cells were first expanded by presensitization and boosting of donor B6 mice in vivo with host-type splenocytes. We then investigated the response patterns of these donor cells when placed in a GVHD-inducing environment in the irradiated BALB.B or CXBE recipients. To confirm that the TDL contained alloreactive anti-miHA-specific T cells, TDL collected from the B6-> BALB.B combination were injected into lethally irradiated BALB.B and CXBE recipients. The ability of these cells to induce GVHD in both hosts suggested that the TDL contained alloreactive CD8+ T cells. Lethal GVHD in the B6->BALB.B model is mediated by either CD4+ or CD4-dependent CD8+ T cells, while in the B6->CXBE model only CD4-dependent CD8+ T cells are responsible for pathogenesis (17). The phenotypic analysis was not sensitive enough to detect any major shifts in the B6->BALB.B TDL but did indicate expansions of at least the Vß10 and Vß14 families in the B6->CXBE TDL (Fig. 1Go). This observation was consistent with the involvement of a limited number of distinct miHA epitopes in the development of the B6 CD8+ anti-CXBE GVHD response.

It was not overly surprising that phenotypic analysis of the B6->BALB.B TDL failed to detect a specific Vß family response. This approach is capable of detecting only major shifts in Vß utilization, and even if successful, it is unable to further characterize the response and determine whether it is oligoclonal. A phenotypic increase in Vß utilization could also be due to polyclonal expansion which would represent increased expression of many TCR V-D-J sequences within that Vß family. For example, polyclonal expansion was previously observed for the CD4+ Vß3 family in the B6->BALB.B strain combination and was likely due to MTV-6 superantigen stimulation (18). T cell repertoire analysis based on the size heterogeneity of the CDR3 region is, therefore, a much more sensitive and powerful tool for the study of GVHD and other types of immune responses (21, 29, 30). It also provides a mechanism for differentiating the specific TCR V-D-J sequences expressed within the same Vß family, and can reveal much more subtle skewing within a Vß family than can be detected by FACS analysis.

The increased Vß heterogeneity observed in the CDR3 size spectratyping analysis would suggest that GVHD is mediated by a heterogeneous population of alloreactive CD8+ T cells that recognize either the same miHA, several miHA, or multiple epitopes of the same Ag in the host. Yet, the overall responses to miHA in the B6->BALB.B and B6->CXBE strain combinations were limited to only a few Vß families, supporting the notion that a limited number of miHA or epitopes were being recognized. The involvement of a limited number of immunodominant miHA in GVHD has been previously found by Perreault et al. in another model system (31). In addition, expansion of a limited set of CD8+ Vß families in local liver GVHD pathogenesis has been observed by Howell et al. (32). It has also been shown that Ag-specific CD8+ T cells exhibit limited heterogeneity at the level of TCR Vß gene usage during a primary response to HIV infection (33). The notion of heterogeneous Vß responses developing against a single or limited number of miHA is highly possible since T cell recognition of Ag involves the interaction of both Vß and V{alpha} chains (34). Each of the responding Vß chains could associate with a different V{alpha} chain to recognize the same epitope. This has been observed in the diversity of CD4+ T cell responses to influenza antigenic determinants (35).

It is estimated that more than 29 miHA locus differences exist between the B6 and BALB/c (and therefore the BALB.B) inbred mouse strains (36). Yet only a few immunodominant miHA appear to be recognized in vivo by MHC-matched allogeneic T cells responsible for skin graft rejection (37). An immunodominant hierarchy was also found to operate for the generation of miHA-specific CTL in vitro (14) and was possibly due to the comparative abilities of miHA to compete successfully for Ag-binding residues in the appropriate MHC molecules presented by APC. The affinity/avidity of the interaction of the specific TCR for miHA/self-MHC may also be an important factor of miHA immunodominance. Alternatively, T cells that respond more vigorously to strong miHA may down-regulate weaker responses to other miHA via cytokine production. Each of these potential mechanisms or combinations thereof could account for the phenomenon of competitive immunodominance. Recent studies comparing CTL immunodominant specificities and skin graft rejection in the B6 anti-BALB.B and CXB strain combinations have found a distinct lack of correlation between the two responses, with CTL recognizing only a limited number of miHA operative in vivo (13).

A similar lack of correlation with CTL immunodominant specificities had previously been found in GVHD (15, 17). For GVHD then, the relevant question becomes how extensive are the number of miHA that are actually involved in GVHD development? There must be certain limitations and qualifications for miHA to serve in this capacity. At least two of these criteria would seem to be immunogenicity and tissue distribution. In terms of the latter, it is known that some miHA have unique tissue expression (38, 39), and it would be expected that for optimum GVHD pathogenesis, Ag should be available not only in cells of hemopoietic origin but also in the primary target organs, including the intestine, liver, and skin. The lack of GVHD in irradiation chimeric models that have miHA expressed only in the host hemopoietic compartment supports the notion that the presence of miHA in both locations is required (40).

Thus, there may only be a limited number of miHA that fit the criteria for GVHD. In this regard a recent study of the CXB interstrain lethal GVHD responses suggested the minimal involvement of two distinct immunodominant miHA (or associated groups of miHA) in the B6-> BALB.B GVHD response (16). One class I-restricted miHA (GVH-1) appeared to be shared by the CXBE strain, while the second Ag (GVH-2) was uniquely expressed by the BALB.B strain. The biased CDR3-size skewing of Vß1, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 14 families in both the BALB.B and CXBE recipients may represent a response to common miHAs shared by BALB.B and CXBE mice, i.e., GVH-1. Although the same CDR3 size bands were skewed in each corresponding Vß family (except for Vß14), the final identity of these specificities will depend on sequence analysis of the CDR3 segments involved in each response. Furthermore, the biased CDR3 usage of Vß4 in the BALB.B recipients, not present in the spectratype of the CXBE recipients, might represent a response to the unique BALB.B miHA, i.e., GVH-2. Experiments are under way to determine whether positively selected CD8+Vß4+ T cells will induce GVHD in BALB.B but not CXBE recipients.

The biased CDR3 size skewing of Vß14 displayed the only nonidentical skewing pattern between the B6->BALB.B and B6->CXBE T cell responses. The BALB.B spectratype exhibited two additional skewed bands. The additional bands present in the Vß14 spectratype of the BALB.B recipients might also represent a response to the unique BALB.B miHA (GVH-2). Although B6 Vß14+ T cells injected into either BALB.B or CXBE recipients induced lethal GVHD (80% mortality by day 80 for both groups of recipients; Figs. 4GoB and 5B), the number of cells injected into the BALB.B recipients was 30-fold less (1 x 105 vs 3.3 x 106) than into the CXBE recipients. This difference in the response suggested a possible additive effect of different anti-miHA clonotypes in the BALB.B, consistent with GVH-1 and GVH-2. The capacity of presensitized Vß14+ donor T cells to cause lethal GVHD is noteworthy on its own accord. It has been very difficult in the past to demonstrate GVHD induction with normal donor T cells directed to limited miHA specificities. The use of miHA congenic strain combinations has failed to generate detectable GVHD, even when donor cells were presensitized to host Ags (16, 41). Single cloned T cells have been used successfully before to induce GVHD (42), but these were CD4+ T cells. Furthermore, any clone (CD4+ or CD8+), due to their extensive expansion in culture, could potentially differ from normal T cells in mediation of disease pathogenesis (e.g., by abnormal acquisition or loss of adhesion molecules responsible for migration into target tissue). The use of normal donor T cells with limited heterogeneity to generate GVHD, as with the Vß14+ cells, will ultimately enable the investigation of associations between specific anti-miHA responses and tissue distribution of lesions.

Characterization of the TCR usage by T cells responding to miHA and mediating GVHD will help us to understand the scope of these complex responses and ultimately the nature of the miHA responsible for their induction. With future developments in diagnostic capabilities, our appreciation for the GVHD response repertoires may also eventually allow for new targeted strategies for prevention of GVHD.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank David Dicker for his expert technical assistance in performing the flow cytometric analysis and fluorescent cell sorting, as part of the Kimmel Cancer Institute Flow Cytometry Facility.


    Footnotes
 
1 This research was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Research Grants HL55593 and CA60630. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Robert Korngold, Kimmel Cancer Institute, Jefferson Medical College, 233 S. 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: BMT, bone marrow transplantation; ATBM, anti-Thy-1 mAb plus C-treated bone marrow; B6, C57BL/6By; GVHD, graft-vs-host disease; MST, median survival time; miHA, minor histocompatibility antigen/s; RI, recombinant inbred; TDL, thoracic duct lymphocytes; CDR3, complementarity-determining region 3, DEPC, diethyl pyrocarbonate. Back

Received for publication September 18, 1997. Accepted for publication February 26, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Thomas, E. D., R. A. Clift, R. Storb. 1984. Indications for marrow transplantation. Annu. Rev. Med. 35:1.[Medline]
  2. Gale, R. P.. 1985. Graft-versus-host disease. Immunol. Rev. 88:193.[Medline]
  3. Santos, G. W., A. D. Hess, G. B. Vogelsang. 1985. Graft-versus-host reactions and disease. Immunol. Rev. 88:169.[Medline]
  4. Deeg, H. J., R. Storb. 1984. Graft-versus-host disease: pathophysiological and clinical aspects. Annu. Rev. Med. 35:11.[Medline]
  5. Ferrara, J., H. J. Deeg. 1991. Graft-versus-host disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 324:667.[Medline]
  6. Kernan, N. A.. 1994. T-cell depletion for prevention of graft-versus-host disease. S. J. Forman, and K. G. Blume, and E. D. Thomas, eds. Bone Marrow Transplantation 124. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge, MA.
  7. Kolb, H. J., J. Mittermuller, C. H. Clemm, E. Holler, G. Ledderose, G. Brehm, M. Heim, W. Wilmanns. 1990. Donor leukocyte transfusions for treatment of recurrent chronic myelogenous leukemia in marrow transplant patients. Blood 76:2462.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Korngold, R., J. Sprent. 1978. Lethal graft-versus-host disease following bone marrow transplantation across minor histocompatibility barriers in mice: prevention by removing mature T cells from marrow. J. Exp. Med. 148:1687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Perreault, C., F. Decary, S. Brochu, M. Gyger, R. Belanger, D. Roy. 1990. Minor histocompatibility antigens. Blood 76:1269.[Free Full Text]
  10. Goulmy, E., P. Voogt, C. van Els, M. de Bueger, J. van Rood. 1991. The role of minor histocompatibility antigens in GVHD and rejection: a mini-review. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1:49.
  11. Martin, P. J.. 1991. Increased disparity for minor histocompatibility antigens as a potential cause of increased GVHD risk in marrow transplantation from unrelated donors compared with related donors. Bone Marrow Transplant 8:217.[Medline]
  12. Rammensee, H. G., K. Falk, O. Rotzschke. 1993. Peptides naturally presented by MHC class I molecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11:213.[Medline]
  13. Nevala, W. K., C. Paul, P. J. Wettstein. 1997. Reduced diversity of CTLs specific for multiple minor histocompatibility antigens relative to allograft rejection in vivo. J. Immunol. 158:1102.[Abstract]
  14. Wettstein, P. J.. 1986. Immunodominance in the T-cell response to multiple non-H-2 histocompatibility antigens. II. Observation of a hierarchy among dominant antigens. Immunogenetics 24:24.[Medline]
  15. Korngold, R., P. J. Wettstein. 1990. Immunodominance in the graft-vs-host disease T cell response to minor histocompatibility antigens. J. Immunol. 145:4079.[Abstract]
  16. Korngold, R., C. Leighton, L. E. Mobraaten, M. A. Berger. 1997. Inter-strain graft-vs.-host disease T-cell responses to immunodominant minor histocompatibility antigens. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 3:57.[Medline]
  17. Berger, M., P. J. Wettstein, R. Korngold. 1994. T cell subsets involved in lethal graft-versus-host disease directed to immunodominant minor histocompatibility antigens. Transplantation 57:1095.[Medline]
  18. Berger, M. A., R. Korngold. 1997. Immunodominant CD4+ T cell receptor Vß repertoire involved in graft-versus-host disease responses to minor histocompatibility antigens. J. Immunol. 159:77.[Abstract]
  19. Gorski, J., M. Yassai, X. Zhu, B. Kissella, C. Keever, N. Flomenberg. 1994. Circulating T cell repertoire complexity in normal individuals and bone marrow recipients analyzed by CDR3 size spectratyping. J. Immunol. 152:5109.[Abstract]
  20. Gorski, J., T. Piatek, M. Yassai, K. Maslanka. 1995. Improvements in repertoire analysis by CDR3 size spectratyping: bifamily PCR. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 76:99.
  21. DePalma, R., J. Gorski. 1995. Restricted and conserved T-cell repertoires involved in allorecognition of class II major histocompatibility complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:8836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Bruce, J., F. W. Symington, T. J. McKearn, J. Sprent. 1981. A monoclonal antibody discriminating between subsets of T and B cells. J. Immunol. 127:2496.[Abstract]
  23. Ceredig, R., J. W. Lowenthal, M. Nabholz, H. R. MacDonald. 1985. Expression of interleukin-2 receptors as a differentiation marker on intrathymic stem cells. Nature 314:98.[Medline]
  24. Dialynas, D. P., D. B. Wilde, P. Marrack, A. Pierres, K. A. Wall, W. Havran, G. Otten, M. R. Loken, M. Pierres, J. Kappler, F. W. Fitch. 1983. Characterization of the murine antigenic determinant, designated L3T4a, recognized by monoclonal antibody GK1.5: expression of L3T4a by functional T cell clones appears to correlate primarily with class II MHC antigen-reactivity. Immunol. Rev. 74:29.[Medline]
  25. Korngold, R., J. R. Bennink. 1984. Collection of mouse thoracic duct lymphocytes. Methods Enzymol. 108:270.[Medline]
  26. Unkeless, J. C.. 1979. Characterization of a monoclonal antibody directed against mouse macrophage and lymphocyte Fc receptors. J. Exp. Med. 150:580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Casanova, J. L., P. Romero, C. Widmann, P. Kourilsky, J. L. Maryanski. 1991. T cell receptor genes in a series of class I major histocompatibility complex-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones specific for a Plasmodium berghei nonapeptide: implications for T cell allelic exclusion and antigen-specific repertoire. J. Exp. Med. 174:1371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sprent, J.. 1977. Migration and lifespan of lymphocytes. F. Loor, and G. Roelants, eds. B and T Lymphocytes in Immune Recognition 59.-82. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K.
  29. Monteiro, J., R. Hingorani, R. Peroglizzi, B. Apatoff, P. K. Gregersen. 1997. Oligoclonality of CD8+ T cells in multiple sclerosis. Autoimmunity 23:127.
  30. Hingorani, R., J. Monteiro, R. Furie, E. Chartash, C. Navarrete, R. Pergolizzi, P. K. Gregersen. 1996. Oligoclonality of Vß 3 TCR chains in the CD8+ T cell population of rheumatoid arthritis patients. J. Immunol. 156:852.[Abstract]
  31. Perreault, C., J. Jutras, D. C. Roy, J. G. Filep, S. Brochu. 1996. Identification of an immunodominant mouse minor histocompatibility antigen (MiHA): T cell response to a single dominant MiHA causes graft-versus-host disease. J. Clin. Invest. 98:622.[Medline]
  32. Howell, C. D., J. Li, E. Roper, B. L. Kotzin. 1995. Biased liver T cell receptor Vß repertoire in a murine graft-versus-host disease model. J. Immunol. 155:2350.[Abstract]
  33. Pantaleo, G., J. F. Demarest, H. Soudeyns, C. Graziosi, F. Denis, J. W. Adelsberger, P. Borrow, M. S. Saag, G. M. Shaw, R. P Sekaly, A. S. Fauci. 1994. Major expansion of CD8+ T cells with a predominant Vß usage during the primary immune response to HIV. Nature 370:463.[Medline]
  34. Schwartz, R. H.. 1985. T-lymphocyte recognition of antigen in association with gene products of the major histocompatibility complex. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 3:237.[Medline]
  35. Caton, A. J., W. Gerhard. 1992. The diversity of the CD4+ T cell response in influenza. Immunology 4:85.
  36. Bailey, D. W., L. E. Mobraaten. 1969. Estimates of the number of loci contributing to the histoincompatibility between C57BL-6 and BALB-c strains of mice. Transplantation 7:394.[Medline]
  37. Wettstein, P. J., D. W. Bailey. 1982. Immunodominance in the immune response to "multiple" histocompatibility antigens. Immunogenetics 16:47.[Medline]
  38. Johnson, L. L., D. W. Bailey, L. E. Mobraaten. 1981. Genetics of histocompatibility in mice. IV. Detection of certain minor (non-H-2) H antigens in selected organs by the popliteal node test. Immunogenetics 14:63.[Medline]
  39. Griem, P., H.-J. Wallny, K. Falk, G. Schonrich, G. Hammerling, H.-G. Rammensee. 1991. Uneven tissue distribution of minor histocompatibility protein versus peptides is caused by MHC expression. Cell 65:633.[Medline]
  40. Korngold, R., J. Sprent. 1982. Features of T cells causing H-2-restricted lethal graft-vs.-host disease across minor histocompatibility barriers. J. Exp. Med. 155:872.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Blazar, B. R., D. C. Roopenian, P. A. Taylor, G. J. Christianson, A. Panoskaltsis-Mortari, D. Vallera. 1996. Lack of GVHD across classical, single minor histocompatibility (miH) locus barriers in mice. Transplantation 61:619.[Medline]
  42. Miconnet, I., R. Huchet, D. Bonardelle, R. Motta, C. Canon, E. Garay-Rojas, M. Kress, M. Reynes, O. Halle-Pannenko, M. Bruley-Rosset. 1990. Graft-versus-host mortality induced by noncytolytic CD4+ T cell clones specific for non-H-2 antigens. J. Immunol. 145:2123.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Takahashi, M. Amagai, T. Nishikawa, Y. Fujii, Y. Kawakami, and M. Kuwana
Novel System Evaluating In Vivo Pathogenicity of Desmoglein 3-Reactive T Cell Clones Using Murine Pemphigus Vulgaris
J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 1526 - 1535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Zilberberg, D. McElhaugh, L. N. Gichuru, R. Korngold, and T. M. Friedman
Inter-Strain Tissue-Infiltrating T Cell Responses to Minor Histocompatibility Antigens Involved in Graft-Versus-Host Disease as Determined by V{beta} Spectratype Analysis
J. Immunol., April 15, 2008; 180(8): 5352 - 5359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. J. Kappel, J. Pinilla-Ibarz, A. A. Kochman, J. M. Eng, V. M. Hubbard, I. Leiner, E. G. Pamer, G. Heller, M. R. M. van den Brink, and D. A. Scheinberg
Remodeling specific immunity by use of MHC tetramers: demonstration in a graft-versus-host disease model
Blood, March 1, 2006; 107(5): 2045 - 2051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. H. Kaplan, B. E. Anderson, J. M. McNiff, D. Jain, M. J. Shlomchik, and W. D. Shlomchik
Target Antigens Determine Graft-versus-Host Disease Phenotype
J. Immunol., November 1, 2004; 173(9): 5467 - 5475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Stanzani, S. L. R. Martins, R. M. Saliba, L. S. St. John, S. Bryan, D. Couriel, J. McMannis, R. E. Champlin, J. J. Molldrem, and K. V. Komanduri
CD25 expression on donor CD4+ or CD8+ T cells is associated with an increased risk for graft-versus-host disease after HLA-identical stem cell transplantation in humans
Blood, February 1, 2004; 103(3): 1140 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J.-F. Poulin, M. Sylvestre, P. Champagne, M.-L. Dion, N. Kettaf, A. Dumont, M. Lainesse, P. Fontaine, D.-C. Roy, C. Perreault, et al.
Evidence for adequate thymic function but impaired naive T-cell survival following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the absence of chronic graft-versus-host disease
Blood, December 15, 2003; 102(13): 4600 - 4607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. J. Korst and R. G. Crystal
Active, specific immunotherapy for lung cancer: hurdles and strategies using genetic modification
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1319 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Kook, A. M. Risitano, W. Zeng, M. Wlodarski, C. Lottemann, R. Nakamura, J. Barrett, N. S. Young, and J. P. Maciejewski
Changes in T-cell receptor VB repertoire in aplastic anemia: effects of different immunosuppressive regimens
Blood, May 15, 2002; 99(10): 3668 - 3675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Baron, I. McMorrow, D. H Sachs, and C. LeGuern
Persistence of Dominant T Cell Clones in Accepted Solid Organ Transplants
J. Immunol., October 15, 2001; 167(8): 4154 - 4160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. W. Langerak, R. van den Beemd, I. L. M. Wolvers-Tettero, P. P. C. Boor, E. G. van Lochem, H. Hooijkaas, and J. J. M. van Dongen
Molecular and flow cytometric analysis of the V{beta} repertoire for clonality assessment in mature TCR{alpha}{beta} T-cell proliferations
Blood, July 1, 2001; 98(1): 165 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Boileau, M. Houde, G. Dulude, C. H. Clegg, and C. Perreault
Regulation of Extrathymic T Cell Development and Turnover by Oncostatin M
J. Immunol., June 1, 2000; 164(11): 5713 - 5720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
G. Dulude, D.-C. Roy, and C. Perreault
The Effect of Graft-versus-Host Disease on T Cell Production and Homeostasis
J. Exp. Med., April 19, 1999; 189(8): 1329 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow