The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dennert, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dennert, G.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 4190-4198.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Expression of ADP-Ribosyltransferase on Normal T Lymphocytes and Effects of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide on Their Function1

Shigefumi Okamoto, Olga Azhipa, Yajing Yu, Elizabeth Russo and Gunther Dennert2

Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ADP-ribosyltransferase (ADPRT) is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored cell surface enzyme on CTL. Expression of this enzyme correlates with suppression of CTL functions in the presence of its substrate ß-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD). To investigate the immunoregulatory importance of ADPRT on normal lymphocytes in vivo, NAD was injected into mice and the effects on cell-mediated and humoral immunity were assessed. Induction of both delayed-type hypersensitivity and CTL, but not Ab responses, are shown to be suppressed by NAD. Consistent with this, mature T cells, but not B cells or macrophages, express ADPRT and are able to ADP-ribosylate cell surface proteins. ADP-ribosylated molecules were identified as LFA-1, CD8, CD27, CD43, CD44, and CD45. Concomitant to ADP-ribosylation of these molecules, T cell trafficking to secondary lymphoid organs is suppressed by NAD. To examine whether this is due to effects of NAD on cell activation, Ag-stimulated responses were assayed in vitro. NAD is shown to inhibit induction of cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, and cytokine secretion. It is suggested that ADPRT regulates T cells on the level of transmembrane signaling via ADP-ribosylation of cell surface molecules. This effect is reported to be indirect, as it involves transmission of signals through TCRs, which are not ADP-ribosylated.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Posttranslational modification of proteins constitutes an important mechanism by which intracellular signaling pathways are regulated. This is in contrast to extracellular signaling mechanisms, which typically utilize binding of effector molecules to cell surface receptors and which in turn trigger transmembrane signals. An interesting exception to this mechanism has recently been discovered in CTL (1). These cells express on their cell surface an enzyme, ADP-ribosyltransferase (ADPRT),3 which attaches ADP-ribose from NAD to arginine residues on the extracellular domains of membrane proteins (1, 2, 3). As a consequence, important functions are inhibited, including cell proliferation, target cell binding, and cytolytic activity (1). One of the major proteins modified by ADPRT on CTL is LFA-1 (4), prompting the speculation that modification of adhesion molecules might constitute the principal pathway by which this enzyme exerts its function (4). In support of this possibility, CTL activation induced by Ab-mediated cross-linking of coreceptors was found to be inhibited in the presence of NAD (4, 5). Because previous observations had been made with fully differentiated CTL, the question arose whether this regulatory pathway is unique to CTL or is shared with naive lymphocytes. Here we report that the ADPRT regulatory circuit appears to be activated by the injection of normal mice with NAD. Induction of cell-mediated, but not humoral, immunity is shown to be inhibited. Consistent with these functional effects, CD4 and CD8 cells, but not B cells or macrophages, are shown to display cell surface ADPRT. As a consequence, incubation with radiolabeled NAD leads to modification of several cell surface molecules, providing clues to the possible mechanisms mediating these effects. Results are presented documenting inhibition of T cell functions, such as lymphocyte homing and Ag-induced responses. We conclude that ADPRT modifies cell surface molecules, which in turn causes inhibition of TCR-mediated transmembrane signaling.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mouse strains and in vivo assays for cell-mediated and humoral immunity

C57BL/6 (H-2b), B6.C-H-2bm1 (Kbm1; I-Ab), and B6. C-H-2bm12 (Kb; I-Abm12) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). To isolate cortisone-resistant thymocytes, 6-wk-old mice were injected with 4 mg of hydrocortisone (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in PBS i.p. and the thymi harvested 2 days later (6). To induce delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), mice were primed with 100 µg of keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) in CFA (i.p.) on day 0. On day 5, mice were challenged into the footpad with 150 µg of KLH in saline and assayed for footpad swelling on day 6. Similarly, mice were primed with 109 pfu of a replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus (i.v.) on day 0 and challenged in the footpad on day 9 with the same dose of virus and assayed for footpad swelling on day 10. The defective adenovirus was obtained from Microbix Biosystems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and propagated as described by the supplier. Footpad swelling was measured with a gauge (Mitsutoyo, Tokyo, Japan). To assay humoral immune responses, mice were immunized i.p. with 100 µg of DNP-KLH (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) in CFA on day 0 and bled on day 9. Ig subsets were determined by ELISA using DNP-BSA (Calbiochem)-coated plates and Ig class-specific Abs (Caltag, South San Francisco, CA).

Cell purification, fluorometric analysis, cell migration assays, and treatment of cells with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PIPLC)

To isolate peritoneal exudate cells (PEC), mice were injected with 2 ml of 2x thioglycolate (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) i.p. PEC were harvested 3 days later by peritoneal lavage. To deplete T cells, spleen cells were treated with anti-Thy-1 (T24.31.7) for 45 min at 4°C, followed by 1:10 low tox rabbit complement (Accurate Chemical, Westbury, NY) for 1 h at 37°C (7). Live cells were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque centrifugation (1, 7). Ig-positive cells were purified by panning spleen cells with anti-IgA, -G, and -M Abs (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) (8). T cells were isolated by passage over nylon wool columns (9), and CD4 or CD8 cells were collected by panning. Nylon wool nonadherent (NWNA) cells were treated with anti-CD4 (GK1.5) or anti-CD8 (AD4) for 45 min at 4°C; washed and suspended in complete RPMI 1640 medium containing 5 x 10-5 M ß-mercaptoethanol, 0.2 mM glutamine, 1 mM pyruvate, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 10% FCS, and 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.2); and then incubated for 45 min on ice-cold plastic dishes that had been coated with anti-Ig Ab. Adherent cells were harvested (8, 10). To isolate splenic macrophages, spleen cells were incubated in complete RPMI medium containing 20% FCS for 60 min at 37°C on plastic dishes and adherent cells were harvested. The purity of cell populations was analyzed on a FACStarplus (Becton Dickinson) instrument by using FITC anti-Thy1.2 (53-2.1), FITC anti-CD3{epsilon} (145-2C11), phycoerythrin anti-CD4 (GK1.5), FITC anti-CD8{alpha} (53-6.7) (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), and phycoerythrin anti-mouse IgM mAbs (Caltag). Purified T cells contained more than 90% T cells and less than 2% B cells and purified B cells more than 97% B cells and less than 1% T cells.

Lymphocyte migration assays were performed as described (11). Briefly, 5 x 106 cells were labeled with 5 µCi/100 µl Na2[51Cr]O4 (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) for 1 h at 37°C and cell aliquots of 100 µl injected into the tail vein of C57BL/6 mice. After 1 h, organs were harvested and counted in a gamma scintillation counter. Values are calculated as the percent of total radioactivity injected and plotted as % cell recovery. ADPRT was released from intact cells by incubating 1 to 2.5 x 108/ml in complete RPMI medium containing 5 U/ml PIPLC (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) for 1 h at 37°C (1).

Cell cultures, cytokine, and D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) assays

MLR were set up in complete RPMI medium containing 10% FCS with 1.5 x 106 responder and 3 x 106 irradiated (1000 rad) stimulator cells per 1-ml well (1). CTL activity was assayed on day 5 at different E:T ratios in a 4-h assay and percent cytotoxicity expressed as percentage of releasable counts after subtraction of spontaneous release (1). To induce CTL, specific for adenovirus, mice were injected with 109 pfu i.v. on day 0 and splenocytes harvested on day 9. Spleen cells were restimulated in vitro by culture for 5 days with 1 pfu of adenovirus per cultured cell. CTL activity was assayed in a 6-h Cr51 release assay using C57SV targets that had been infected with adenovirus (50 pfu/cell) 24 h before (12). Spleen cells or purified T cells were either cultured in 96-well flat-bottom tissue plates (Becton Dickinson) (5 x 105 cells/well) coated with 5 µg/ml of anti-CD3 mAb (500A2) or in the presence of PMA (10 ng/ml) and calcium ionophore (A23187; 100 ng/ml), Con A (10 µg/ml), or LPS (10 µg/ml) (Sigma) for 2 days at 37°C. Proliferative responses were assayed by pulsing cells for the last 18 h of the culture with 0.5 µCi/well of [3H]TdR (ICN). Incorporated radioactivity was counted in a liquid scintillation counter. To assay cytokine secretion, cells from draining lymph nodes of mice that had been primed with 100 µg of KLH in CFA s.c. were cultured at 8 x 105 cells per 200 µl with 50 µg/ml of KLH. Supernatants were harvested 24 h (IL-2) or 72 h (IFN-{gamma}, IL-4, IL-10) later and assayed by ELISA using a commercial Ab kit purchased from PharMingen (13).

Generation of IP3 was assayed in NWNA cells after CD3 cross-linking. Cells (2 x 107) were suspended in 200 µl of 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) containing 137 mM NaCl, 4.5 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM glucose, 0.5% BSA, 5 mM LiCl, and 5 µg anti-CD3 mAb (500A2) for 1 min at 37°C followed by anti-hamster IgG (5 µg) (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for the times indicated. Ice-cold TCA was added to a final concentration of 7.5% and proteins removed by centrifugation. Supernatants were extracted, washed three times with 10 vol of diethylether, neutralized with NaHCO3, and IP3 assayed by a solid phase binding kit (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) (14).

Cell labeling with [32P]NAD, preparation of cell lysates, immunoprecipitations, gel electrophoresis, and enzyme assays

Cells (107 cells/ml) were labeled with [32P]NAD by incubation in complete RPMI medium containing 100 µCi/ml of [32P]NAD (Amersham), 100 µM of NAD, and 1 mM of ADP-ribose (Sigma) at 37°C for 1 h (1). Cells were excessively washed in large volumes of medium to remove radioactivity. To prepare crude cell lysates, cells were suspended in lysis buffer (PBS containing 1% Nonidet P-40 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF), incubated on ice for 30 min, and then centrifuged at 12,000 x g at 4°C for 10 min and supernatants collected. For immunoprecipitations, cell lysates (107 cells/200 µl) were precleared with 20 µl of 50% (v/v) protein G-Sepharose (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) for 1 h at 4°C under rotation. After removal of G-Sepharose beads by centrifugation, 5 µg of anti-LFA-1 (M17/4), anti-LFA-2 (RM2-5), anti-{alpha}4 integrin (R1-2), anti-L-selectin (MEL-14), anti-CD3{epsilon} (500A2), anti-CD4 (GK1.5), anti-CD8{alpha} (53.6.7), anti-CD27 (LG.3A10), anti-CD28 (37.51), anti-CD43 (S7), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CD45 mAb (30F11.1), or anti-CD48 (HM48-1) (PharMingen) were added, followed by incubation for 2 h at 4°C with rotation. Immune complexes were adsorbed to 40 µl of 50% (v/v) protein G-Sepharose for 1 h at 4°C with rotation. After washing in lysis buffer, immunoprecipitates were solubilized with 40 µl of 2x concentrated SDS sample buffer (20% glycerol, 9% ß-mercaptoethanol, 4% SDS, 0.005% bromophenol blue, and 120 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8) at 100°C for 5 min and centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 s to remove insoluble material. Proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and dried gels exposed to X-OMAT films (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) at -80°C with intensifying screens.

Arginine-specific ADPRT was assayed using agmatine as substrate, and the transfer of [32P]ADP-ribose from [32P]NAD to agmatine was determined (3, 15). After incubation in 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ADP-ribose, 100 µM NAD (5000 cpm/nmole of [32P]NAD) and 20 mM agmatine (Sigma) in a final volume of 100 µl for 90 min at 30°C, samples were applied to 1.8 ml of QAE-Sephadex (Pharmacia). Noncharged [32P]ADP-ribosylagmatine was eluted with 3 ml of water and quantified by liquid scintillation counting. Enzyme activity is expressed as picomoles of ADP-ribosylagmatine formed in 90 min.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
NAD inhibits induction of DTH and CTL but not Ab responses

We had previously reported that the presence of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored ADPRT on CTL correlates with regulatory effects of NAD on their in vitro functions (1). These findings raised the question of whether other lymphocyte subsets are also regulated by NAD and whether this regulatory pathway is demonstrable in vivo. To examine this, mice were primed with KLH and injected with 1 mg of NAD i.p., followed by an assay for cell-mediated immunity, i.e., a DTH response. Results shown in Figure 1GoA show that DTH is significantly inhibited in mice that had received injections of NAD starting on the day of KLH sensitization and the following 4 days thereafter. Injection of NAD before sensitization with KLH had only very small effects (data not shown). To examine whether inhibition of DTH is due to effects on the sensitization or effector phase of the response, mice were primed with KLH and again injected with NAD for 5 days. Mice were rested for 2 wk and then challenged with KLH in the footpads. Figure 1GoB shows that NAD-treated mice express considerably lower DTH, indicating that the sensitization step of the DTH reaction is inhibited. When animals were primed with KLH on day 0, received NAD on days 4 and 5, KLH injected on day 5, and DTH assayed on day 6, DTH is found to be somewhat inhibited (Fig. 1GoC). Interestingly, an additional injection of NAD 6 h after the KLH challenge and the last NAD injection (day 5 plus 6 h) causes a more significant inhibition (Fig. 1GoC). Therefore, NAD appears to also inhibit the effector step of the DTH reaction.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Effect of NAD injection on induction of DTH, CTL sensitization, and Ab production. A, Groups of five mice were immunized with KLH on day 0 and injected with 1 mg/day of NAD from day 0 to 4. Mice were challenged with KLH on day 5 and assayed for DTH on day 6. B, Mice were immunized with KLH and injected with NAD as in A. After resting for 2 wk, they were injected with KLH in the footpad and tested for a DTH response 1 day later. C, Mice were immunized with KLH on day 0 and injected with NAD on days 4 and 5 (NAD/day 4, 5). The challenge dose of KLH in the footpad was given on day 5 at the time of NAD injection. DTH was assayed on day 6. Another group of mice received an additional injection of NAD on day 5, 6 h after the first NAD injection (NAD/day 4, 5, 5 plus 6 h). D, Mice were immunized with adenovirus (109 pfu) on day 0 and injected with NAD from day 0 to 9. Mice were challenged with virus in the footpad on day 10 and assayed for DTH on day 11. E, The mice assayed in D were sacrificed on day 11 and spleen cells restimulated with virus for 5 days in vitro at which time cells were assayed for cytolytic activity. The experiments shown are one of three independent sets. The error bars shown for DTH are SD values from groups of five mice. The error bars in the CTL assay constitute SD values from triplicate wells in the cytotoxicity assay.

 
The finding that NAD inhibits a DTH response raises the question of whether other cell-mediated immune responses, such as the induction of CTL, may also be inhibited. To examine this, a replication-defective adenovirus was used as an immunogen (12). Sensitization of mice with this virus and challenge in the footpad lead to induction of a strong DTH reaction (Fig. 1GoD). Treatment of mice with NAD, starting with the day of immunization, causes significant suppression of the DTH reaction, similar to effects seen with KLH. Spleen cells from these mice were harvested, restimulated with virus in vitro, and assayed for cytolytic activity 5 days later. Effector cells derived from NAD-injected mice express much lower cytotoxicity (Fig. 1GoE). Therefore, NAD inhibits the in vivo priming of CTL.

Both DTH and induction of CTL are Th1-type immune responses. Therefore, the question is raised whether Ab production may similarly be affected by injection of NAD. To find out, mice were immunized with DNP-KLH and injected with NAD for 5 days beginning on the day of immunization. On day 10, sera were harvested and assayed for the presence of IgM, IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG3. The results shown in Figure 2Go show that there is no difference in Ab class production in NAD-injected mice. Therefore, NAD is predicted to not significantly influence the relative production of Th1 vs Th2 cytokines, which was suggested from the Ab responses of B cells.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Effect of in vivo NAD injection on Ab production. Groups of five mice were immunized with DNP-KLH on day 0 and injected with NAD from day 0 to 9. On day 10, sera were harvested and Ig classes assayed by ELISA. The experiment shown is one of two. The error bars constitute SD values from groups of five mice.

 
ADPRT is expressed on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, but not on B cells or macrophages: correlation of T cell sensitivity to NAD and labeling of adhesion molecules

The selective in vivo effect of NAD on cell-mediated immune responses suggests that not all lymphoid cells express ADPRT on their cell surface. To examine this, spleen cells, lymph node cells, and thymocytes were treated with PIPLC and supernatants assayed for released ADPRT activity. The results shown in Figure 3GoA show that lymph node cells release high enzyme activity, spleen cells release intermediate activity, and thymocytes release almost no activity. Because this points to the presence of ADPRT on mature T cells, mice were injected with cortisone to eliminate immature thymocytes, and the remaining cells were tested for ADPRT activity. Cortisone-resistant cells release higher enzyme activity, consistent with the notion that ADPRT is present on mature T cells (Fig. 3GoB). In agreement with these results, treatment of spleen cells with anti-Thy-1 and complement abolishes the ability to release ADPRT (Fig. 3GoA), raising the question of whether both CD4 and CD8 cells express the enzyme. Figure 3GoC shows that purified CD4 and CD8 cells release ADPRT, whereas B cells, splenic macrophages, and PEC do not.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Release of ADPRT activity from lymphoid cells and sensitivity to NAD. A, Thymus, lymph node, and spleen cells were incubated with PIPLC and supernatants assayed for ADPRT activity. Spleen cells were also incubated with anti-Thy-1 and complement before treatment with PIPLC. B, Release of ADPRT from normal and hydrocortisone-resistant thymocytes. The error bars constitute SD values from groups of three mice. C, Purified T cells, CD4 cells, CD8 cells, B cells, and PEC were assayed for release of ADPRT activity as above. D, Spleen cells were cultured with Con A or LPS in the presence of NAD and assayed for cell proliferation on day 2. The experiments shown constitute one set of a total of three.

 
Expression of ADPRT on T cells predicts that they should be sensitive to regulation by NAD. In agreement, incubation of spleen cells with the T cell mitogen Con A in the presence of NAD leads to suppression of the proliferative response (Fig. 3GoD). In contrast, LPS-induced B cell proliferation is unaffected (Fig. 3GoD). Therefore, the sensitivity of lymphocytes to NAD correlates with the expression of ADPRT on the cell surface and is in agreement with the differential effects NAD has on cell-mediated vs humoral immunity.

The presence of ADPRT on T cells predicts that incubation with radioactive NAD should result in cell surface labeling. Figure 4GoA shows that lysates, prepared from identical numbers of [32P]NAD-labeled spleen cells, purified T cells, CD4 cells, and CD8 cells, but not lysates from B cells or macrophages, contain radioactive proteins. Interestingly, CD8 cells are labeled much stronger than the same number of CD4 cells, which is consistent with the somewhat higher ADPRT activity releasable from CD8 cells (Fig. 3GoC). In comparing the labeling patterns of these cell populations, it can be seen that they are quite similar, although differences in labeling intensities of individual proteins are evident. For example, there is a band in the 40-kDa range that is weakly labeled in spleen and CD4 cells, but very strongly labeled in purified T cells and CD8 cells. The possibility that this protein constitutes the CD8 molecule itself was examined by incubating T cell lysates with anti-CD8 Ab. Results presented in Figure 4GoB show that this Ab precipitates a 40-kDa protein band, which comigrates with a band of similar molecular mass in whole cell lysates. Figure 4GoB also shows that LFA-1, previously identified on CTL as an ADP-ribosylated molecule (5), can be precipitated as a labeled heterodimer. Because these as well as previous results (2, 5) pointed to a preferential interaction of ADPRT with adhesion molecules, labeling of other cell surface molecules was examined. Data in Figure 4GoB show that four additional proteins, i.e., CD27, CD43, CD44, and CD45, can be identified as ADP-ribosylated proteins. Other molecules, which were found not to be ADP-ribosylated, are CD4 (Fig. 4GoB), CD2 (LFA-2), CD28, CD48, {alpha}4-integrins, and L-selectin (data not shown). Attempts to precipitate TCR-associated, ADP-ribosylated molecules were negative. Precipitation of Nonidet P-40 or digitonin extracts from labeled cells with either anti-CD3{epsilon}- or anti-{zeta}-chain Abs failed to reveal labeled protein bands (Fig. 4GoB and data not shown). Therefore, although a broad spectrum of cell surface molecules can be ADP-ribosylated by action of the ADPRT on naïve T cells, the TCR is not one of them.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. ADP-ribosylation of proteins on T cells. A, Spleen cells (spleen), splenic macrophages (M{Phi}), PEC, Ig+ B cells (Ig+), purified T cells (NWNA), CD4+ cells, and CD8+ cells were labeled with [32P]NAD. Whole cell lysates from 106 cells per lane were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. B, T cell lysates from 107 cells per lane were immunoprecipitated with the Ab specificities indicated and immunoprecipitates analyzed as in A. The results shown were repeated in three independent experiments.

 
NAD inhibits homing of T lymphocytes to secondary lymphoid organs

The observation that adhesion molecules are ADP-ribosylated on T cells raised the possibility that these modifications affect lymphocyte receptor function, perhaps providing an explanation for the immunoregulatory effects of NAD in vivo, especially the inhibition of DTH effector function. Adhesion molecules are known to mediate multiple functions, including the migration of sensitized T cells into the site of a DTH reaction and the trafficking of lymphocytes through secondary lymphoid organs. Lymphocyte homing has been reported to be a function of some of the molecules shown here to be ADP-ribosylated, i.e., CD44, CD43, and LFA-1 (16, 17, 18, 19). To examine whether modification of these molecules correlates with changes in lymphocyte homing patterns, lymph node cells were incubated with NAD for 3 h, labeled with 51Cr, and then injected into syngeneic recipients. After 60 min, cell trafficking was assessed by determining radioactivity in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs. The data show (Fig. 5GoA) that homing of NAD-treated cells into lymph nodes, spleen, Peyer’s patches, and lung is strongly inhibited compared with controls. Titration of NAD concentrations reveals a dose-dependent effect in which 100 µM and 1 mM of NAD induce maximal effects and 1 µM and 10 µM induce intermediate effects (Fig. 5GoA).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Effect of NAD on lymphocyte trafficking. A, Lymph node cells (5 x 106) were treated with NAD for 3 h at 37°C, labeled with 51Cr, and injected i.v. Peripheral lymph nodes (PLN), Peyer’s patches (PP), spleen, and lungs were removed 60 min later and radioactivity assayed. Data are plotted as relative recovery in which recovery of 51Cr-labeled cells, not treated with NAD, from individual organs is set as 100%. B, Effect of NAD injection on lymphocyte trafficking. Mice were injected with 1 mg of NAD i.p. 1 h before transfusion of 51Cr-labeled lymph node cells. Radioactivity was assayed in individual organs and plotted as % of cells recovered, setting as 100% the radioactivity of injected cells. Error bars constitute SD values from groups of five mice. The data shown are from one of two independent experiments.

 
In view of the results that NAD injection inhibits the effector phase of the DTH reaction in vivo, it is interesting to examine whether NAD concentrations, effective in the homing assay, can be reached by injection of NAD. To find out, labeled cells were transferred into mice that had been injected once with 1 mg of NAD just before adoptive cell transfer. In NAD-injected mice a significant decrease in cell homing to lymph nodes, Peyer’s patches, and spleen is seen (Fig. 5GoB). However, the effects do not reach those obtained when cells are incubated in vitro with 100 µM of NAD. This suggests that the effective in vivo NAD concentration reached when 1 mg is injected is likely below 100 µM.

Because T cells but not B cells express the cell surface ADPRT (Fig. 3GoC), a prediction is that the trafficking of T cells, not B cells, should be regulated by NAD. To examine this, purified cell populations were treated with NAD and injected into recipients. Results shown in Figure 6GoA show that the homing of T cells but not B cells is inhibited by NAD. Therefore, the suppressive effect of NAD on lymphocyte migration correlates with expression of ADPRT on the cell surface. Consistent with this, removal of ADPRT from T cells by PIPLC, before incubation with NAD, results in significant inhibition of its suppressive effect (Fig. 6GoB).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Effect of NAD on T cell and B cell trafficking. A, Purified T cells or B cells were treated with NAD and assayed for trafficking as in Figure 5Go. B, Purified T cells were treated with PIPLC, incubated with 100 µM of NAD for 3 h at 37°C, and then assayed for trafficking as in Figure 5Go. Error bars constitute SD values from groups of three mice. The data shown are from one of two independent experiments.

 
NAD inhibits responses of CD4 and CD8 cells as well as preferentially the secretion of IL-2

The effects of NAD on T cell trafficking could provide an explanation for the suppressive effects of NAD on the effector step of the DTH reaction. However, it is more difficult to understand why inhibition of lymphocyte trafficking should interfere with the sensitization phase of the DTH reaction, as well as, CTL responses. Moreover, inhibition of lymphocyte homing would not be able to explain why cell-mediated but not humoral immune responses are suppressed by NAD. The possibility was therefore entertained that inhibition of lymphocyte trafficking is due to a more general effect on cell functions, rather than due to a failure of homing receptors to bind to their ligands. It is well documented that lymphocyte migration and homing involve multiple reactions, triggered by receptor ligand binding and resulting in transmission of signals that in turn cause cytoskeletal movements, cell rolling, and cytokine gene activation (20, 21, 22). Therefore, inhibition of lymphocyte homing could be due to a block at one or another of these reactions. In agreement with this, the experiments presented above have shown already that NAD inhibits proliferative responses to Con A, consistent with a more general effect of NAD on T cell responses.

To examine which functions might be impaired by NAD, in vitro responses of CD4 and CD8 cells to antigenic stimulation were tested. To assay activation of CD4 cells, spleen responder cells were incubated with MHC class II discordant stimulator cells and tested for cell proliferation. Results shown in Figure 7GoA show that the proliferation of C57BL/6 spleen cells, stimulated with MHC class II discordant bm12 cells, is completely inhibited by 100 or 1000 µM of NAD. Intermediate effects are induced with 10 µM of NAD. Quite similar results are seen when C57BL/6 responder cells are incubated with MHC class I discordant bm1 stimulator cells (Fig. 7GoA). In these cultures, CD8 cells are the principal responders. Not only is cell proliferation inhibited by 100 or 1000 µM of NAD, the induction of cytolytic activity is also inhibited (Fig. 7GoB). Therefore, T cells responding to either MHC class I or MHC class II Ags, CD8 and CD4 cells, respectively, are inhibited by NAD in their response to allogeneic stimulator cells.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Effect of NAD on cell proliferation and induction of cytotoxicity in MLR. A, Proliferative responses of C57BL/6 spleen cells to B6 C-H-2bm1 (bm1) or B6 C-H-2bm12 (bm12) stimulator cells in the presence of NAD as assayed on day 5. B, Cytotoxic response of C57BL/6 spleen cells sensitized to B6 C-H-2bm1 stimulator cells in the presence of NAD as assayed on day 5. Error bars constitute SD values from triplicate wells for proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. The data shown are from one of five independent experiments.

 
The observation that responses of CD8 cells are inhibited in vitro is consistent with the results seen in vivo, in which the priming of CTL to adenoviral Ags was found to be suppressed. However, the finding that responses of CD4 cells are also inhibited is not consistent with the failure of NAD to suppress a humoral immune response. The possibility that Th1 cells express higher sensitivity to NAD than Th2 cells is not supported by the finding that there is no change in the production of Ig classes in response to DNP-KLH in NAD-injected animals (Fig. 2Go). It was possible, however, that NAD exerts subtle effects on the secretion of cytokines that are important for induction of cell-mediated immune responses. To investigate this, lymph node cells from KLH-primed mice were restimulated in vitro with KLH in the presence of NAD, and the levels of secreted IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, IL-4, and IL-10 were assayed. Results shown in Figure 8Go show that 100 or 1000 µM of NAD suppresses secretion of all four cytokines. At 10 µM NAD, only weak suppressive effects are seen on the secretion of IFN-{gamma}, IL-4, and IL-10. In contrast, at this NAD concentration, secretion of IL-2 is completely inhibited. Lower but significant effects are also seen at 1 µM of NAD. Therefore, IL-2 secretion appears to be particularly sensitive to the suppressive effects of NAD. From the lymphocyte homing assays it had been concluded that injection of NAD leads to effective NAD concentrations in vivo that are below 100 µM. Therefore, concentrations of NAD in the 1- to 10-µM range are likely to be responsible for the in vivo effects of NAD on cell-mediated immunity.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Effect of NAD on Ag-induced cytokine secretion. Lymph node cells from mice immunized 8 days before were restimulated in vitro with KLH and culture supernatants harvested for cytokine ELISA assays. The data shown are from one of two independent experiments.

 
NAD inhibits receptor-mediated transmembrane signaling and does not induce apoptosis

The finding that NAD inhibits Ag-stimulated T cell responses in vitro points to the inhibition of important cell activation pathways. The possibility that treatment of cells with NAD leads to apoptotic cell death was investigated. In T cells incubated with NAD, no induction of DNA fragmentation or loss of cell survival were demonstrable (data not shown). Rather, it appeared that in the presence of NAD or after NAD treatment, cells persist in an unresponsive state. They ultimately die at the same rate as untreated T cells in the absence of Ag stimulation. NAD does not penetrate cell membranes and ADPRT is a cell surface enzyme. Therefore, it is most likely that the inhibitory effects are caused by ADP-ribosylation of cell surface molecules that participate in the early steps of cell activation processes. Because Ag-induced responses are inhibited by NAD, the ability of the TCR to induce cell activation was assayed. Purified T cells were incubated on anti-CD3-coated plates or with anti-CD3 and a second cross-linking Ab added to accomplish optimal receptor ligation. Two responses were assayed, the generation of IP3 and the induction of cell proliferation. Figure 9Go, A and B, shows that both the generation of IP3 and the induction of cell proliferation are inhibited by NAD. That this effect is not due to the failure of the anti-CD3 Ab to bind to NAD-treated cells is shown in Figure 9GoC. There is no decrease of anti-CD3 binding demonstrable by fluorometric analysis.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9. Effect of NAD on induction of IP3 and cell proliferation. A, IP3 generation in purified T cells, induced by anti-CD3 Ab. The second cross-linking Ab was added at T = 0. Cells were pretreated with 100 µM of NAD for 3 h at 37°C where indicated. B, Proliferative response on day 2 of purified T cells stimulated on either anti-CD3-coated tissue culture plates or with PMA plus calcium ionophore (CIO) in the presence of NAD. Error bars constitute SD values from triplicate wells for the proliferation assay. C, Expression of CD3, assayed by fluorometry on T cells treated (dashed line) or not treated (solid line) with 100 µM of NAD for 3 h at 37°C. The dotted line represents cells not reacted with Ab. The data shown are from one of three independent experiments.

 
Inhibition of IP3 generation and cell proliferation in NAD-treated T cells could be due to effects directly related to transmembrane signaling or due to effects further downstream in the signaling cascade. To examine this, we asked whether NAD exert suppressive effects in cells in which transmembrane signaling is circumvented by direct stimulation of protein kinase C. Direct stimulation of protein kinase C can be induced by PMA and calcium ionophore, causing a strong proliferative response in normal T cells. Figure 9GoB shows that NAD has no effect on PMA plus ionomycin-induced cell proliferation. These results show that the suppressive effect of NAD on T cell responses is due to effects on the level of transmembrane signaling. Moreover, the finding that NAD has no effects on PMA and ionomycin-induced cell proliferation is consistent with the finding that incubation of cells with NAD does not induce apoptosis. The finding that signaling through CD3 is inhibited by NAD, despite the fact that neither CD3 nor any of its associated peptides are ADP-ribosylated (Fig. 4Go) suggests that inhibition of TCR signaling by NAD may be due to an indirect effect involving ADP-ribosylation of cell surface molecules that modulate TCR signaling.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this report, we show that mature peripheral T cells from normal mice express cell surface ADPRT activity, releasable by PIPLC from intact cells. Therefore, not only CTL but also naïve mature T cells possess a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored cell surface ADPRT (1, 4, 5). Both CD4 and CD8 cells display the enzyme, whereas B cells and macrophages do not. As had previously been shown for CTL (1), incubation of naïve T cells with radiolabeled NAD causes modification of multiple proteins. Identification of these proteins was thought to be key to understanding the action of NAD on T cell functions (4). Following previous leads in CTL (4), successful attempts are reported in which in addition to LFA-1, other cell surface molecules, i.e., CD8, CD27, CD43, CD44, and CD45, are shown to be ADP-ribosylated on naïve T cells.

These molecules represent major protein bands in cell extracts from NAD-labeled cells, but they likely do not constitute all the proteins that can be modified. Labeling of these molecules raises the question of whether ADPRT specifically interacts with and recognizes these proteins. It had been reported that ADPRT on skeletal muscle myotubes ADP-ribosylates integrin {alpha}7 (2), prompting the hypothesis that cell surface ADPRT selectively modifies adhesion molecules. While this remains to be proven, experiments with soluble enzyme preparations have shown that not only the arginine analogue agmatine, but also histone and other proteins, may provide a substrate for T cell ADPRTs (1, 23). The alternative possibility, therefore, that modification of cell surface molecules is a function of their preferential association with the ADPRT cannot be excluded.

One of the principal reasons for identifying the proteins that are ADP-ribosylated was to elucidate the mechanism by which NAD regulates T cell functions. This is made difficult, however, by the fact that these molecules have multiple functions. Consequently, it is impossible to predict which modification may be responsible for the observed effects. Therefore, the alternative approach, investigating at which step cell functions are inhibited by NAD, is a more promising one. It is shown here that cell activation induced by TCR cross-linking is inhibited in NAD-treated cells and that this is caused by a block on the level of transmembrane signaling. Activation of T cells by PMA and calcium ionophore, circumventing transmembrane signaling, is not affected by NAD.

This result has important implications. Localization of the inhibitory action to the cell membrane eliminates the albeit remote possibility of NAD action inside the cell. More important is that signaling through a structure, i.e., the TCR, shown not to be ADP-ribosylated, is inhibited. Therefore, NAD effects are likely due to an indirect action of ADP-ribosylated molecules on TCR signaling. The hypothesis is therefore proposed that ADP-ribosylation of cell surface molecules indirectly regulates TCR signaling. Several important molecules were found to be ADP-ribosylated, including CD8 and CD45. Modification of CD8 could be responsible for the inhibition of CTL, both in the induction and the effector phases. This is a particularly attractive hypothesis because the CD8 molecule binds the src-related kinase p56lck, which is important in TCR-mediated signaling (24, 25). In fact, down-regulation of this kinase in NAD-treated CTL has already been demonstrated (4). The observation that CD45 is ADP-ribosylated may provide an additional clue, perhaps explaining why CD4 cells are inhibited by NAD. CD45 is known to be necessary for activation of p56lck, which is important in TCR-mediated signaling (26, 27, 28, 29, 30). Modification of CD45 could lead to an inability to associate with cell surface molecules that have bound p56lck to their cytoplasmic tail, such as CD4 and CD8, and thereby could inhibit p56lck activation by CD45 (31, 32, 33, 34).

The failure of the TCR to transmit a transmembrane signal leading to the generation of second messengers and gene activation could explain the failure of NAD-incubated T cells to respond to Con A or allogeneic stimulation in MLR. It may, however, also provide an explanation for NAD’s inhibition of migration and homing of lymphocytes in vivo. Binding to and penetration of high endothelial venules by lymphocytes require receptor ligand engagement as well as transmission of transmembrane signals (20). Therefore, the failure of NAD-treated cells to efficiently home into lymphoid organs may be due to the observed block in transmembrane signaling. However, more direct effects of ADP-ribosylation on adhesion molecules, affecting their ability to bind to ligands, cannot be excluded. An interesting finding in this respect is that NAD not only inhibits trafficking of T cells to lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches, but also homing to the spleen. CD43 is a homing receptor for spleen-seeking lymphocytes (19). Therefore, it is intriguing that CD43 is ADP-ribosylated. Whether the modification of CD43 is directly responsible for the inhibition of lymphocyte homing to the spleen is not known; therefore, conclusions from the finding that adhesion molecules are ADP-ribosylated await further experimentation.

Our results in tissue culture, demonstrating inhibition of T cell responses to antigenic stimulation, as well as the in vivo results on lymphocyte trafficking predict that NAD could have effects when injected into animals. We show that not only are the induction and effector steps of DTH reactions inhibited, but also the sensitization of CTL. All these reactions require Ag recognition by TCRs and cell proliferation. Therefore, inhibition by NAD may not be unexpected. It is not known, however, whether suppression of the effector phase of the DTH reaction by NAD may be at least in part due to an inhibition of sensitized cells from migrating into the site of the DTH reaction. This would be consistent with the effects NAD has on the trafficking of normal T cells.

An interesting observation is that cell-mediated, but not humoral immunity to KLH is inhibited by NAD. Given the finding that B cells lack ADPRT and are insensitive to the action of NAD, this points to an action of NAD on Th cells. The finding that Ig classes are not changed in NAD-injected mice suggests that there are no major alterations in Th cytokine secretion. Cytokine assays of spleen cells from primed mice, restimulated with Ag in the presence of NAD, revealed that high concentrations of NAD inhibit secretion of IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, IL-4, and IL-10, whereas low concentrations exert preferential effects on IL-2 secretion. It should be noted that in mice in which the IL-2 gene had been inactivated by homologous recombination, the production of IgM is severely suppressed (35). The fact that this is not seen in NAD-treated mice suggests that production of this cytokine is not completely inhibited. It is interesting that in IL-2-deficient mice, the differentiation of CTL does not take place, indicating that IL-2 is necessary for CTL generation (36). Whether this requirement for IL-2 in the induction of CTL explains the preferential effect of NAD on cell-mediated immunity remains to be shown. Therefore, presently it is not clear why cell-mediated but not humoral immunity is inhibited in NAD-injected animals.

However, the finding that cell-mediated immunity is suppressed documents that effective in vivo concentrations of NAD can be reached by injection. This observation raises the exciting possibility of influencing Th1 responses by the injection of NAD for therapeutic purposes in which suppression of cell-mediated immunity is desirable, for example, in certain autoimmune diseases. More difficult to answer is the question of how this regulatory mechanism participates in the regulation of normal immune responses. Extracellular NAD concentrations had been reported in mice to be in the range of 0.15 µM (37), and in vitro effects are demonstrable at concentrations as low as 1 µM of NAD in the experiments presented here. Therefore, NAD concentrations necessary to induce effects have to reach local NAD concentrations of 1 µM and higher, raising the question of the origin of extracellular NAD during T cell responses. One possibility is that NAD is released from cells, as a consequence of massive cell lysis during inflammatory immune reactions that could be sufficient to cause ADP-ribosylation of cell surface molecules and functional suppression of T cells. The local release of NAD during an inflammatory reaction could therefore serve to down-modulate the extent of a cell-mediated immune reaction. However, presently direct evidence for release of NAD from lysing cells is lacking.

The results presented here describe a novel and potentially important immunoregulatory mechanism in T cells. That this mechanism may be operative in vivo is supported by the observation that certain mouse and rat strains lacking one of the T cell ADPRTs, i.e., RT6, develop autoimmunity (23, 38, 39, 40, 41). Therefore, ADP-ribosylation of adhesion molecules may constitute a self-limiting autoregulatory mechanism that suppresses immunity to self-Ags.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. S. Stohlman and W. Stohl for useful discussions and careful reading of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Public Health Service Grants CA 37706, CA 59318, and AI 40038. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gunther Dennert, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, NOR 621, M/S 73, P.O. Box 33800, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033-0800. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: ADPRT, ADP-ribosyltransferase; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; PIPLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C; NWNA, nylon wool nonadherent; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity; PEC, peritoneal exudate cell; IP3, D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate. Back

Received for publication October 10, 1997. Accepted for publication December 29, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Wang, J., E. Nemoto, A. Y. Kots, H. R. Kaslow, G. Dennert. 1994. Regulation of cytotoxic T cells by ecto-nicotinamide adenosine dinucleotide (NAD) correlates with cell surface GPI-anchored/arginine ADP-ribosyltransferase. J. Immunol. 153:4048.[Abstract]
  2. Zolkiewska, A., J. Moss. 1995. Processing of ADP-ribosylated integrin alpha 7 in skeletal muscle myotubes. J. Biol. Chem. 270:9227.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Zolkiewska, A., M. S. Nightingale, J. Moss. 1992. Molecular characterization of NAD: arginine ADP-ribosyltransferase from rabbit skeletal muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:11352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wang, J., E. Nemoto, G. Dennert. 1996. Regulation of CTL by ecto-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) involves ADP-ribosylation of a P56lck-associated protein. J. Immunol. 156:2819.[Abstract]
  5. Nemoto, E., Y. Yu, G. Dennert. 1996. Cell surface ADP-ribosyltransferase regulates lymphocyte function-associated molecule-1 (LFA-1) function in T cells. J. Immunol. 157:3341.[Abstract]
  6. Ceredig, R., A. L. Glasebrook, H. R. McDonald. 1982. Phenotypic and functional properties of murine thymocytes. I. Precursors of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and interleukin 2-producing cells are all contained within a subpopulation of "murine" thymocytes as analyzed by monoclonal antibodies and flow microfluorometry. J. Exp. Med. 155:358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Sugawara, S., H. R. Kaslow, G. Dennert. 1993. CTX-B inhibits CTL cytotoxicity, and cytoskeleton movements. Immunopharmacology 26:93.[Medline]
  8. Mage, M. G., L. L. McHugh, T. L. Rothstein. 1979. Mouse lymphocytes with and without surface immunoglobulin: preparative scale separation in polystyrene tissue culture plates coated with specifically purified anti-immunoglobulin. J. Immunol. Methods 15:47.
  9. Julius, M. H., E. Simpson, L. A. Herzenberg. 1973. A rapid method for isolation of functional thymus-derived murine lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 3:645.[Medline]
  10. Wysocki, W. L., V. L. Sato. 1978. "Panning" for lymphocytes: a method for cell selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75:2844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hamann, A., D. Jablonski-Westrich, A. Duijvestijn, E. C. Butcher, H. Baisch, R. Harder, H.-G. Thiele. 1988. Evidence for accessory role of LFA-1 in lymphocyte-high endothelium interaction during homing. J. Immunol. 140:693.[Abstract]
  12. Yang, Y., K. U. Jooss, Q. Su, H. C. J. Ertl, J. M. Wilson. 1996. Immune responses to viral antigens versus transgene product in the elimination of recombinant adenovirus-infected hepatocytes in vivo. Gene Ther. 3:137.[Medline]
  13. Mosmann, T. R., T. A. Fong. 1989. Specific assays for cytokine production by T cells. J. Immunol. Methods 116:151.[Medline]
  14. Fitzpatrick, E. A., A. M. Kaplan, D. A. Cohen. 1996. Defective CD4+ T cell signaling in murine AIDS: uncoupling of the T cell receptor complex from PIP2 hydrolysis. Cell. Immunol. 167:176.[Medline]
  15. Yu, Y., S. Okamoto, E. Nemoto, G. Dennert. 1997. Molecular cloning of a functional murine arginine specific mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase and its expression in lymphoid cells. DNA Cell Biol. 16:235.[Medline]
  16. Picker, L., E. C. Butcher. 1992. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of lymphocyte homing. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 10:561.[Medline]
  17. Lesley, J., R. Hyman, P. W. Kincade. 1993. CD44 and its interaction with extracellular matrix. Adv. Immunol. 54:271.[Medline]
  18. Larson, R. S., T. A. Springer. 1990. Structure and function of leukocyte integrins. Immunol. Rev. 114:181.[Medline]
  19. McEvoy, L. M., H. Sun, J. G. Frelinger, E. C. Butcher. 1997. Anti-CD43 inhibition of T cell homing. J. Exp. Med. 185:1493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hynes, R.-O.. 1992. Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 69:11.[Medline]
  21. Bargatze, R. F., M. A. Jutila, E. C. Butcher. 1995. Distinct roles of L-selectin and integrins {alpha}4ß7 and LFA-1 in lymphocyte homing to Peyer’s patch-HEV in situ: the multistep model confirmed and refined. Immunity 3:99.[Medline]
  22. Sanchez-Mateos, P., M. R. Campanero, M. A. del Pozo, F. Sanchez-Madrid. 1995. Regulatory role of CD43 leukosialin on integrin-mediated T-cell adhesion to endothelial matrix ligands and its polar redistribution to a cellular uropod. Blood 86:2228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Greiner, D. L., J. P. Mordes, E. S. Handler, M. Angelillo, N. Nakamura, A. A. Rossini. 1987. Deletion of RT6.1+ T lymphocytes induces diabetes in resistant biobreeding/Worchester(BB/W) rats. J. Exp. Med. 166:461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Barber, E. K., J. K. Dasgupta, S. F. Schlossman, J. M. Trevillyan, C. E. Rudd. 1989. The CD4 and CD8 antigens are coupled to a protein-tyrosine kinase (p56lck) that phosphorylates the CD3 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:3277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Turner, J. M., M. H. Brodsky, B. A. Irving, S. D. Levin, R. M. Perlmutter, D. R. Littman. 1990. Interaction of unique N-terminal region of tyrosine kinase p56lck with cytoplasmic domains of CD4 and CD8 is mediated by cysteine motifs. Cell 60:755.[Medline]
  26. Koretzky, G. A., J. Picus, M. L. Thomas, A. Weiss. 1990. Tyrosine phosphatase CD45 is essential for coupling T-cell antigen receptor to the phosphatidyl inositol pathway. Nature 346:66.[Medline]
  27. Volarevic, S., B. B. Niklinska, C. M. Burns, C. H. June, A. M. Weissman, J. D. Ashwell. 1993. Regulation of TCR signaling by CD45 lacking transmembrane and extracellular domains. Science 260:541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hovis, R. R., J. A. Donovan, M. A. Musci, D. G. Motto, F. D. Goldman, S. E. Ross, G. A. Koretzky. 1993. Rescue of signaling by chimeric protein containing the cytoplasmic domain of CD45. Science 260:544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Desai, D. M., J. Sap, J. Schlessinger, A. Weiss. 1993. Ligand-mediated negative regulation of a chimeric transmembrane receptor tyrosine phosphatase. Cell 73:541.[Medline]
  30. Desai, D. M., J. Sap, O. Silvennoinen, J. Schlessinger, A. Weiss. 1994. The catalytic activity of the CD45 membrane-proximal phosphatase domain is required for TCR signaling and regulation. EMBO J. 13:4002.[Medline]
  31. Ostergaard, H. L., D. A. Shackelford, T. R. Hurley, P. Johnson, R. Hyman, B. M. Sefton, I. S. Trowbridge. 1989. Expression of CD45 alters phosphorylation of lck-encoded tyrosine protein kinase in murine lymphoma T-cell lines. Pro. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:8959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Ostergaard, H. L., I. S. Trowbridge. 1990. Coclustering CD45 with CD4 or CD8 alters the phosphorylation and kinase activity of P56lck. J. Exp. Med. 172:347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Arendt, C. W., G. Hsi, H. L. Ostergaard. 1995. Immobilized antibodies to CD45 induce rapid morphologic changes and increased tyrosine phosphorylation of P56lck-associated protein in T cells. J. Immunol. 155:5095.[Abstract]
  34. Ng, D. H. W., J. D. Watts, R. Aebersold, P. Johnson. 1996. Demonstration of a direct interaction between p56lck and the cytoplasmic domain of CD45 in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Schorle, H., T. Holtschke, T. Hunig, A. Schimpl, I. Horak. 1991. Development and function of T cells in mice rendered interleukin-2 deficient by gene targeting. Nature 352:621.[Medline]
  36. Kramer, S., C. Mamalaki, I. Horak, A. Schimpl, D. Kioussis, T. Hunig. 1994. Thymic selection and peptide-induced activation of T cell receptor-transgenic CD8 T cells in interleukin-2-deficient mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:2317.[Medline]
  37. Kim, U.-H., M.-K. Kim, J.-S. Kim, M.-K. Han, B.-H. Park, H.-R. Kim. 1993. Purification and characterization of NAD glycohydrolase from rabbit erythrocytes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 305:146.
  38. Haag, F., V. Anderson, S. Karsten, F. Koch-Nolte, H.-G. Thiele. 1995. Both allelic forms of the rat T cell differentiation marker RT6 display nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-glycohydrolase activity, yet only RT6.2 is capable of automodification upon incubation with NAD. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:2355.[Medline]
  39. Nakamura, N., Y. Tsutsumi, S. Kimata, L. Sawada, G. Hasegawa, Y. Kitagawa, K. Nakano, M. Kondo, H. Nakao, S. Makino. 1991. Induction of diabetes by polyI:C and anti-RT6.1 antibody treatment in DR-BB rats. Endocrinol. Jpn. 38:523.[Medline]
  40. Hunt, H. D., D. M. Lubaroff. 1992. Identification of functional T cell subsets and surface antigen changes during activation as they relate to RT6. Cell. Immunol. 143:194.[Medline]
  41. Fowell, D., D. Mason. 1993. Evidence that the T cell repertoire of normal rats contains cells with the potential to cause diabetes: characterization of the CD4+ T cell subset that inhibits this autoimmune potential. J. Exp. Med. 177:627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Scheuplein, N. Schwarz, S. Adriouch, C. Krebs, P. Bannas, B. Rissiek, M. Seman, F. Haag, and F. Koch-Nolte
NAD+ and ATP Released from Injured Cells Induce P2X7-Dependent Shedding of CD62L and Externalization of Phosphatidylserine by Murine T Cells
J. Immunol., March 1, 2009; 182(5): 2898 - 2908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Hong, A. Brass, M. Seman, F. Haag, F. Koch-Nolte, and G. R. Dubyak
Lipopolysaccharide, IFN-{gamma}, and IFN-beta Induce Expression of the Thiol-Sensitive ART2.1 Ecto-ADP-Ribosyltransferase in Murine Macrophages
J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 6215 - 6227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Adriouch, S. Hubert, S. Pechberty, F. Koch-Nolte, F. Haag, and M. Seman
NAD+ Released during Inflammation Participates in T Cell Homeostasis by Inducing ART2-Mediated Death of Naive T Cells In Vivo
J. Immunol., July 1, 2007; 179(1): 186 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Chen, Y.-G. Chen, P. C. Reifsnyder, W. H. Schott, C.-H. Lee, M. Osborne, F. Scheuplein, F. Haag, F. Koch-Nolte, D. V. Serreze, et al.
Targeted Disruption of CD38 Accelerates Autoimmune Diabetes in NOD/Lt Mice by Enhancing Autoimmunity in an ADP-Ribosyltransferase 2-Dependent Fashion.
J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 4590 - 4599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
A. Zolkiewska
Ecto-ADP-ribose Transferases: Cell-Surface Response to Local Tissue Injury
Physiology, December 1, 2005; 20(6): 374 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Krebs, S. Adriouch, F. Braasch, W. Koestner, E. H. Leiter, M. Seman, F. E. Lund, N. Oppenheimer, F. Haag, and F. Koch-Nolte
CD38 Controls ADP-Ribosyltransferase-2-Catalyzed ADP-Ribosylation of T Cell Surface Proteins
J. Immunol., March 15, 2005; 174(6): 3298 - 3305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Kawamura, F. Aswad, M. Minagawa, K. Malone, H. Kaslow, F. Koch-Nolte, W. H. Schott, E. H. Leiter, and G. Dennert
P2X7 Receptor-Dependent and -Independent T Cell Death Is Induced by Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide
J. Immunol., February 15, 2005; 174(4): 1971 - 1979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
W. Ohlrogge, F. Haag, J. Lohler, M. Seman, D. R. Littman, N. Killeen, and F. Koch-Nolte
Generation and Characterization of Ecto-ADP-Ribosyltransferase ART2.1/ART2.2-Deficient Mice
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2002; 22(21): 7535 - 7542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Z.-X. Liu, O. Azhipa, S. Okamoto, S. Govindarajan, and G. Dennert
Extracellular Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Induces T Cell Apoptosis In Vivo and In Vitro
J. Immunol., November 1, 2001; 167(9): 4942 - 4947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Bortell, J. Moss, R. C. McKenna, M. R. Rigby, D. Niedzwiecki, L. A. Stevens, W. A. Patton, J. P. Mordes, D. L. Greiner, and A. A. Rossini
Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD) and Its Metabolites Inhibit T Lymphocyte Proliferation: Role of Cell Surface NAD Glycohydrolase and Pyrophosphatase Activities
J. Immunol., August 15, 2001; 167(4): 2049 - 2059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Adriouch, W. Ohlrogge, F. Haag, F. Koch-Nolte, and M. Seman
Rapid Induction of Naive T Cell Apoptosis by Ecto-Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide: Requirement for Mono(ADP-Ribosyl)Transferase 2 and a Downstream Effector
J. Immunol., July 1, 2001; 167(1): 196 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Kahl, M. Nissen, R. Girisch, T. Duffy, E. H. Leiter, F. Haag, and F. Koch-Nolte
Metalloprotease-Mediated Shedding of Enzymatically Active Mouse ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase ART2.2 Upon T Cell Activation
J. Immunol., October 15, 2000; 165(8): 4463 - 4469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Z.-X. Liu, S. Govindarajan, S. Okamoto, and G. Dennert
NK Cells Cause Liver Injury and Facilitate the Induction of T Cell-Mediated Immunity to a Viral Liver Infection
J. Immunol., June 15, 2000; 164(12): 6480 - 6486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Koch-Nolte, T. Duffy, M. Nissen, S. Kahl, N. Killeen, V. Ablamunits, F. Haag, and E. H. Leiter
A New Monoclonal Antibody Detects a Developmentally Regulated Mouse Ecto-ADP-Ribosyltransferase on T Cells: Subset Distribution, Inbred Strain Variation, and Modulation Upon T Cell Activation
J. Immunol., December 1, 1999; 163(11): 6014 - 6022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Weng, W. C. Thompson, H.-J. Kim, R. L. Levine, and J. Moss
Modification of the ADP-ribosyltransferase and NAD Glycohydrolase Activities of a Mammalian Transferase (ADP-ribosyltransferase 5) by Auto-ADP-ribosylation
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 1999; 274(45): 31797 - 31803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z.-X. Liu, Y. Yu, and G. Dennert
A Cell Surface ADP-ribosyltransferase Modulates T Cell Receptor Association and Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., June 18, 1999; 274(25): 17399 - 17401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M.-K. Han, Y.-S. Cho, Y. S. Kim, C.-Y. Yim, and U.-H. Kim
Interaction of Two Classes of ADP-ribose Transfer Reactions in Immune Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., June 30, 2000; 275(27): 20799 - 20805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dennert, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dennert, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS