The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hinchliffe, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hinchliffe, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, B. P.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 3924-3932.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Molecular Cloning and Functional Characterization of the Pig Analogue of CD59: Relevance to Xenotransplantation1

Stewart J. Hinchliffe, Neil K. Rushmere, S. Melanie Hanna and B. Paul Morgan2

Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this work, we report the cloning of the cDNA for the porcine analogue of human CD59. Degenerate primers, derived from the N-terminal sequence of pig erythrocyte CD59, were used to obtain the corresponding cDNA sequence. From this sequence, gene-specific primers were designed and used to amplify the 3' and 5' ends of the cDNA using the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) method. The complete 768-bp cDNA so obtained consisted of a 84-bp 5' untranslated region, a 26-amino-acid NH2-signal peptide, a 98-amino-acid coding region, including putative N-glycosylation sites and a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchoring signal, and a 312-bp 3' untranslated region. The mature protein sequence was 48% identical to human CD59 at the amino acid level. Northern blot analysis revealed several distinct CD59 transcripts, and a variability in expression levels of the different transcripts in the panel of tissues screened. Stable expression of pig CD59 in a CD59-negative human cell line conferred protection against lysis by complement from pig and several other species. Separate expression of pig and human CD59 at similar levels in the same cell line allowed a direct functional comparison between these two analogues. Pig CD59 and human CD59 showed similar activity in inhibiting lysis by complement from all species tested; in particular, expressed pig CD59 efficiently inhibited lysis by human complement. The relevance of these data to current work in the engineering of pig organs for xenotransplantation is discussed.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CD59, the major inhibitor of the complement membrane attack complex, is an 18- to 20-kDa glycoprotein, linked to the membrane via a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)3 anchor (1, 2, 3, 4). It is expressed on a wide range of cell types of both hemopoetic and nonhemopoetic origins. The complement-inhibitory activity of CD59 lies in its ability to bind to the {alpha}-chain of C8 in the C5b-8 complex, and also to bind to the b domain of C9 (5). CD59 binding to these two molecules prevents C9 insertion through the lipid membrane, and also prevents C9 polymerization, thus inhibiting the formation of the pore structures of the membrane attack complex (6, 7).

We have previously purified CD59 analogues from rat, sheep, and pig erythrocytes (8, 9, 10). These analogues resemble human CD59 in terms of m.w., membrane anchorage, extent of glycosylation, and function. Each of the CD59 analogues has been shown to inhibit lysis by complement from a wide range of species, suggesting that the active sites are at least partially conserved between species (11). We have also reported the molecular cloning of the CD59 analogues from rat and mouse (12, 13). Sequence data from the cloned CD59 analogues have been compared with predicted candidate active sites that have been tested by mutagenesis and domain swapping (14, 15).

Recent initiatives in the field of organ transplantation have focused on the possibility of using animals as a source of donor organs for human transplants to overcome the shortage of suitable human donor organs, xenotransplantation (16). Numerous practical and ethical considerations have made the pig the animal of choice for the supply of such donor organs. The first major hurdle to be overcome in xenotransplantation is hyperacute rejection, the destruction of the grafted organ within minutes of implantation, mediated by natural Ab and complement. In transplants between distantly related species (discordant transplants) such as pig and man, activation of complement on the endothelium of the foreign organ occurs both through the classical pathway, activated by preexisting natural Abs, and through the alternative pathway, activated independently of Abs. Recent evidence indicates that most of the preexisting natural Abs react with the carbohydrate epitope Gal({alpha}1,3)Gal(6), an epitope absent from humans and Old World primates due to the lack of a functional {alpha}1,3 galactosyltransferase enzyme in these species (17, 18).

Numerous investigators have sought to reduce complement activation in hyperacute rejection by removing the natural Ab and/or by inhibiting complement. Endogenous membrane-bound complement inhibitors in the donor organ were suggested to be ineffective against complement of the recipient, especially at the high levels of attack seen during rejection. To overcome this proposed deficit, several groups have introduced human complement-regulatory proteins (CRP) into pig organs or cells to obtain high levels of expression. Porcine aortic endothelial cells transfected with human CRPs were effectively protected from lysis by human serum (19, 20, 21, 22). Furthermore, pigs transgenic for human CD59 and/or decay-accelerating factor have been developed, and organs obtained from these donors showed enhanced survival in ex vivo models of xenotransplantation (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30) and when transplanted into primates (31, 32).

The potential roles of the endogenous pig CRPs in the protection of the transplanted organ have received little attention. We have undertaken the molecular and structural characterization of the pig CRPs in the expectation that the knowledge gained will be of relevance to pig-to-human xenotransplantation. We have previously described the purification and functional characterization of CD59 from pig erythrocytes and reported that pig CD59 inhibited human complement (10). In this work, we describe the molecular cloning of pig CD59 and the functional characterization of the expressed molecule.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials

Molecular biology. All general reagents were from Sigma Chemical (Poole, U.K.), unless otherwise stated. Ultraspec RNA isolation medium was from Biotecx (Houston, TX). RNase H- Superscript reverse transcriptase, RNase H, terminal dioxynucleotide transferase, and all restriction enzymes were from Life Technologies (Paisley, U.K.). Nick columns for radioactive probe purification, Taq polymerase, and buffers were from Pharmacia (Milton Keynes, U.K.); Vent DNA polymerase was from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA); and dNTPs were from Bioline (London, U.K.). RNase inhibitor rRNasin and pGEM-T vector kit were from Promega (Southampton, U.K.). Geneclean II DNA purification kit was from Anachem (Luton, U.K.), and plasmid purification kits were from Qiagen (Dorking, U.K.). Hybond-N nylon membranes, Rapid-Hyb buffer, rediprime DNA labeling system, and [{alpha}-32P]dCTP were from Amersham International (Little Chalfont, U.K.). Oligonucleotide primers were synthesized in house on an ABI model 394 synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, U.K.).

Tissues, cells, and sera. Animal sera were obtained fresh from the animal facility of University of Wales College of Medicine (Cardiff, U.K.) and stored at -70°C. Normal human serum was obtained from healthy volunteers and stored at -70°C.

The human promonocyte U937 cell line was obtained originally from European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures (ECACC, Porton Down, U.K.). The derivation of a CD59-negative subclone has been previously described (33). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS, 4 mM glutamine, 2 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 IU/ml streptomycin, and 2.5 µg/ml amphotericin. Pig endothelial cells isolated from pig aorta by standard methods were a kind gift from Department of Cardiology, University of Wales College of Medicine. The porcine endothelial cell line PLECT was a kind gift from Dr. Marilyn Moore (University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, U.K.). All tissues for Northern blots were obtained fresh from the local abattoir.

Antibodies. High titer polyclonal antiserum against CD59-negative U937 cells was raised in rabbits using standard procedures. The mAbs against pig CD59 (MEL-1 IgM and MEL-2 IgG1) were generated in house using pig erythrocytes as immunogen. These reagents will be described in detail elsewhere (Hanna et al., in preparation). BRIC229 ({alpha}-human CD59 mAb) was from International Blood Group Reference Laboratory (IBGRL, Bristol, U.K.). Goat anti-mouse/IgG horseradish peroxidase was from Bio-Rad (Hemel Hempstead, U.K.). Goat anti-mouse/IgG phycoerythrin was from DAKO (Glostrup, Denmark).

Reverse transcription

Total RNA was extracted from cultured pig endothelial cells using the Ultraspec RNA isolation system. The RNA was reverse transcribed by incubation with 500 U Superscript RNase H- reverse transcriptase at 20°C for 10 min, then 42°C for 90 min in the presence of 50 mM Tris-HCl, 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 5 µM DTT, 60 U rRNasin, and 2 mM dNTPs, in a total volume of 30 µl.

PCR amplifications

All PCR reactions were conducted in an OmniGene thermal cycler (Hybaid, Middlesex, U.K.). Taq DNA polymerase (2.5 U) was used to amplify the DNA in the presence of NH4+ buffer (16 mM (NH4)2SO4, 67 mM Tris-HCl, 0.01% Tween 20), containing 1 mM MgCl2, 0.08 mM dNTPs, and appropriate primers, in a total reaction volume of 50 µl overlaid with mineral oil.

Degenerate PCR amplification

Random hexamers of DNA (500 ng) were used to prime the initial reverse transcription of 10 µg total RNA to produce a template for the PCR amplification.

Degenerate primers A-PIG (TGC/TTAC/TAAC/TTGC/TATA/C/TAA)and C-PIG (AGG/ATCC/TTC/TC/TTG/TG/ACAG/ACA) were derived from amino-terminal protein sequence corresponding to residues 3–8 (CYNCIN) of pig CD59(7) and a region of high interspecies homology of all known CD59 sequences close to the C terminus corresponding to residues 63–68 (CCKKDL) in human CD59. The approximate positions of these primers are shown in the schematic diagram of the pig CD59 cDNA (Fig. 1Go). A variation on the touchdown procedure of Don et al. (34) was performed, with 500 ng of each primer used in the amplification. A denaturation at 95°C for 4 min was followed by initial cycling parameters of 94°C for 30 s, 54°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 45 s. Thereafter, the annealing temperature of the reaction was decreased 2°C every second cycle from 54°C to a touchdown of 40°C, at which temperature 25 cycles were conducted.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram of the pig CD59 cDNA to show the position of primers used in degenerate PCR, 3' RACE, 5' RACE, and in cloning the full-length coding region. These primer positions are shown in relation to the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR), signal peptide, mature protein coding region, GPI addition signal, and 3' untranslated region (3'UTR).

 
Derivation of the 3' end of pig CD59 cDNA

The 3' end of pig CD59 cDNA was obtained using a modification of the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) method described by Frohman (35). A poly(dT) adaptor primer QT (CCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACGAGGACTCGAGCTCAAGCT17) (28 pmol) was used to reverse transcribe mRNA from 10 µg total RNA. QT binds to the poly(A) tails of all mRNAs, thus priming reverse transcription and consequently adding an extra 35 bases of unique sequence to the cDNA end. Nested PCR was performed using primers specific for this unique sequence, Q0 (CCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACG) and Q1 (GAGGACTCGAGCTCAAGC), along with pig CD59-specific primers D-PIG (TGCACTACGGCCATGAATTG) and E-PIG (TCGTTGAAGCCGTGCCACCC), designed from the cDNA sequence obtained from the degenerate primer PCR reaction. The positions of these primers are shown in Figure 1Go.

In the first amplification, 7% of the QT-primed cDNA was amplified using 25 pmol of primer Q0 and the degenerate primer A-PIG, using touchdown PCR as above. In the second amplification, a 1-µl aliquot of a 1/20 dilution of the first reaction was amplified using 25 pmol Q1 and 25 pmol D-PIG, with the following reaction conditions: 94°C for 30 s, 54°C for 1 min (ramp 2.5), and 72°C for 2 min for 30 cycles. In the third amplification, a 1-µl aliquot of a 1/20 dilution of the second amplification was amplified using 25 pmol Q1 and 25 pmol E-PIG, with the following reaction conditions: 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 1 min (ramp 2.5), and 72°C for 2 min for 30 cycles.

Derivation of the 5' end of pig CD59 cDNA

A pig CD59-specific primer RT-PIG (AGGTCCTTCTTGCAGCAGTTG) (6 pmol), derived from the cDNA sequence obtained from the degenerate PCR reaction, was used in the reverse transcription of the 5' end of the mRNA from 10 µg total RNA. After reverse transcription, the RNA was degraded by incubation for 20 min at 37°C with 2.5 U RNase H. The single-stranded cDNA generated by reverse transcription was purified from primers and enzyme using the Geneclean II kit (Anachem). The purified cDNA was polyadenylated at its 3' end by incubation with 10 U terminal deoxynucleotide transferase (Life Technologies) in the presence of 5 mM ATP at 37°C for 5 min, then 65°C for 10 min. The mixture was then heated to 95°C to denature the enzyme, and 5% of the resulting polyadenylated single-stranded cDNA was used directly in the first PCR amplification. The poly(A) tail generated was used to initially amplify the cDNA with the adaptor primer QT, followed by further amplification using the primers Q0 and Q1 and the pig CD59-specific primers G-PIG (CTTCTCCGCTAGGTTTCTCG) and F-PIG (GCATTCATCGAACCTCCAAC), which were designed from the cDNA sequence obtained from the degenerate PCR.

In the first amplification, the cDNA was amplified using 3 pmol QT primer, 25 pmol Q0, and 25 pmol G-PIG, using the following conditions: 96°C for 5 min, 50°C for 2 min (ramp 2.5), and 72°C for 40 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min.

A 1-µl aliquot of a 1/20 dilution of the first reaction was reamplified using 25 pmol of each of the nested primers Q1 and F-PIG, using the following conditions: 94°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min (ramp 2.5), and 72°C for 2 min for 30 cycles.

Cloning and sequencing of PCR products

Purified PCR products were ligated into the pGEM-T vector cloning site (insert:vector molar ratio 3:1) by incubation with 1 Weiss Unit of T4 DNA ligase (16°C for 16 h) in a total volume of 10 µl of 30 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, and 1 mM ATP. A 1-µl aliquot was then electroporated into electrocompetent DH5{alpha} Escherichia coli at 2.5 kV, 25 µFD, and 200 {Omega} using a Bio-Rad Genepulser. The bacteria were then grown on Luria-Bertani (LB)/Agar plates and selected for by ampicillin resistance and by blue/white color selection using X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl ß-D-galactoside) substrate. Positive colonies were picked, a portion was retained for checking insert size, and the remainder was replated on LB/Agar plates. The retained portion was boiled in 20 µl water for 10 min to release and denature the plasmid, then put on ice for 10 min. PCR was performed using 5 µl of boiled bacteria as the template and T7 and SP6 primers that flank the insert site in the vector, and the reaction was resolved on agarose gels. Colonies with inserts of the correct size were expanded for 16 h in 5 ml LB broth containing 50 µg/ml ampicillin at 37°C, and the plasmids were purified using the QIAprep spin plasmid kit (Qiagen).

Automated sequencing was conducted in house using an ABI model 377 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Southern and Northern blot analysis

Probes for Southern and Northern blot analysis were generated by PCR from double-stranded pig CD59 template DNA and were isolated by elution from a low melting point agarose gel. The DNA concentration was measured and adjusted to 550 ng/ml before denaturation at 95°C for 2 min and quenching in ice water. Lyophilized redi-prime constituents were reconstituted in 45 µl template DNA, 5 µl (50 µCi) [{alpha}-32P]dCTP added, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The product was purified from remaining nucleotide using a Nick column (Pharmacia, Milton Keynes, U.K.) and stored at 4°C.

Total RNA for Northern blot analysis was purified from whole tissues and from cultured pig aortic endothelial cells using the Ultraspec RNA isolation system. The Poly(A)Tract mRNA isolation system (Promega) was used to purify mRNA from cultured endothelial cells. Total RNA (10 µg) or mRNA (2 µg) was run on denaturing agarose gels and was capillary transferred overnight to Hybond-N nylon membrane. For Southern blot analysis, PCR products were run on agarose gels and transferred to Hybond-N using capillary action. The nucleic acids were cross-linked to the membrane by U.V. irradiation (U.V. Stratalinker; Stratagene, Cambridge, U.K.). The membrane was prehybridized in Rapid-Hyb buffer at 65°C for 1 h before addition of the radiolabeled probe that had been denatured at 95°C. Southern blots were hybridized with a 200-bp probe generated from the pig CD59 cDNA cloned using degenerate primers. This was hybridized for 3 h at 65°C, washed twice for 5 min with 0.2x SSC/0.1% SDS at 65°C, and exposed to x-ray film for up to 6 h at -70°C. Northern blots were hybridized for 16 h at 65°C with a 610-bp probe generated from the pig CD59 coding sequence cloned in the expression vector. This was washed at room temperature (twice for 10 min in 2x SSC/0.1% SDS, and twice for 10 min in 1x SSC/0.1% SDS), and exposed to x-ray film for up to 48 h at -70°C.

Construction of eukaryotic expression vector for transfection of pig CD59

The eukaryotic expression vector pDR2EF1{alpha} was a gift from Dr I. Anegon (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U437, Nantes, France) (36). pDR2EF1{alpha} contains the hygromycin-resistance gene, allowing the selection of stable colonies, and the powerful polypeptide chain elongation factor 1{alpha} promotor to generate high and reproducible expression levels (37). From the full-length pig CD59 sequence, two primers, PIGXP-1 (GGTTCTAGAGTAGCGCTGCAGCCGGAC) and PIGXP-2 (GGTGGATCCTTCTCTGCCAACAGGCCT), were designed to PCR amplify the entire coding region, including the Kozak sequence, essential for ribosomal recognition of the translational start site. To ensure sequence fidelity, this PCR was performed using Vent DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) that has proofreading capacity. The template for the PCR was cDNA reverse transcribed from porcine endothelial cell total RNA using random hexamer primers. The PCR primers PIGXP-1 and PIGXP-2 contained XbaI and BamHI restriction sites, respectively. These sites were also present as unique sites in the insertion region of the expression vector, ensuring correct orientation of the insert. PCR product and vector were digested with the above restriction enzymes before ligation. After electroporation into DH5{alpha}, colonies were picked and the plasmids were purified. The presence and fidelity of the pig CD59 cDNA in the vector were confirmed by DNA sequencing of 12 separate clones.

Transfection of CD59-negative U937 cell line

The CD59-negative subclone of the promonocytic cell line U937 was transfected by electroporation with the empty expression vector, the expression vector containing pig CD59 cDNA, or vector containing human CD59 cDNA (13). U937 cells growing in log phase were washed three times with sterile PBS and resuspended in ice-cold RPMI at a final concentration of 3 x 107 cells/ml. Cells (450 µl) were added to a sterile cuvette with 10 µg of supercoiled plasmid. The cuvette was placed on ice for 5 min and electroporated at 270 V and 960 µF using the Bio-Rad Genepulser with capacitance extender. The cuvette was then placed on ice for an additional 30 min. Cells were returned to sterile flasks and cultured for 24 h in 10 ml fresh RPMI containing 10% FCS. Cells were washed once in sterile 0.9% NaCl and resuspended in selection medium (RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS and 0.7 mg/ml hygromycin B; Boehringer Mannheim, Lewes, U.K.). Selection medium was changed every 2 days for approximately 2 wk, by which time all of the nontransfected control cells had died. Transfected cells were then maintained in RPMI containing 10% FCS and 0.1 mg/ml hygromycin B.

FACScan analysis

Cells were harvested, washed three times in PBS/1% BSA, and resuspended at 106 cells/ml in VBS/1% BSA. All steps were conducted on ice. Cells (105) were incubated with appropriate mAbs at 10 µg/ml for 30 min, washed three times with VBS/1% BSA, and incubated for 30 min with a 1/100 dilution of goat anti-mouse/IgG phycoerythrin. Cells were washed three times in VBS/1% BSA, and fluorescence was measured using a FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA).

To examine the effects of treatment with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PIPLC), cells were washed and resuspended at 3 x 106/ml in PBS containing rPIPLC (0.4 U/ml; Peninsula Laboratories, St. Helens, U.K.). After an incubation for 30 min at 37°C, cells were washed and CD59 expression was measured by flow cytometry using the above protocol.

Functional assays

To eliminate the interfering effects of the antibiotics (13), stably transfected cells were cultured in the absence of hygromycin B for 7 days before assessment of sensitivity to complement lysis. Cells growing in log phase were harvested, washed three times in PBS, resuspended in RPMI/10% FCS at 107 cells/ml, and loaded with calcein-AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR; 2 µg/ml) for 30 min at 37°C. Cells were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in a 1/5 dilution of heat-inactivated rabbit anti-U937 polyclonal antiserum in VBS/1% BSA for 15 min at 4°C. Cells were washed once in PBS and resuspended in VBS/1% BSA containing the appropriate dilution of fresh serum. The mixture was incubated for 30 min at 37°C, after which the cells were pelleted, and the supernatant removed and retained for fluorescence measurement using the WellFluor system (Denley, Sussex, U.K.). The cells were then incubated for an additional 15 min in 0.1% Triton X-100, to release any remaining calcein. Residual cell debris was pelleted, and the supernatant was removed for fluorescence measurement. Percentage lysis by serum was calculated as follows: % lysis = [calcein release by complement/(calcein released by complement + calcein released by detergent)] x 100.

SDS-PAGE and Western blotting of cell lysates

Samples were run on 15% SDS-PAGE gels under reducing and nonreducing conditions, blotted onto nitrocellulose, and blocked with 5% dried milk/PBS. The blots were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with primary Abs (10 µg/ml in 5% dried milk/PBS), washed three times in PBS/0.1% Tween-20, incubated with goat anti-mouse/IgG horseradish peroxidase (1/1000 in 5% dried milk/PBS), and washed twice with PBS/0.1% Tween-20, and twice with PBS. Blots were developed using Supersignal Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PCR cloning of pig CD59 cDNA

Degenerate PCR using primers A-PIG and C-PIG produced four PCR products, of approximately 150, 200, 350, and 400 bp. All of the PCR products were cloned. From the resultant colonies, 20 were screened by PCR using T7 and SP6 primer sites in the vector, which identified six colonies containing an insert of the predicted length (200 bp). These six colonies were grown up, and the plasmids were purified and sequenced. All were identical. The amino acid sequence derived from this cDNA sequence was 100% identical to the published partial amino acid sequence for purified pig CD59 (10), thus confirming that the sequence was correct. This sequence was then used to design primers to PCR amplify the 3' and 5' ends (primers summarized in Fig. 1Go). The 5' RACE produced a strong 300-bp PCR product that hybridized on a Southern blot with a probe derived from the 200 bp of known sequence. This was cloned, sequenced, and confirmed to contain the 5' end of the cDNA. 3' RACE produced four PCR products of ~350 bp, ~500 bp, ~1 kb, and ~1.3 kb, all of which hybridized on a Southern blot with the 200-bp probe. The 350- and 500-bp products were cloned and sequenced, and were confirmed to contain the 3' end of pig CD59, differing only in the length of the 3' UTR. The longer products were not analyzed further, but are likely to represent yet longer transcripts of pig CD59.

Reverse-transcriptase PCR of the full-length cDNA for ligation into the expression vector produced a single 629-bp product. After ligation and electroporation, 12 clones were picked, and the plasmids were purified and sequenced. Of these 12 clones, 10 gave the identical sequence, the other two differing by one or two bases. This full-length cDNA sequence is shown in Figure 2Go. The sequence encodes a 84-bp 5' UTR, a 26-amino-acid NH2-signal peptide, and a 98-amino-acid coding region, including two putative N-glycosylation sites at N-18 and N-71 and a GPI-anchoring signal. The predicted site of GPI anchor addition, based upon the consensus requirements for anchor addition (38), was at S-73. The mature protein sequence is 48% identical to human CD59, 46.5% identical to rat CD59, and 38% identical to murine CD59. A comparison of the sequences of the various CD59 analogues is shown in Figure 3Go.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of pig CD59. The numbers below refer to the nucleotide sequence; the numbers on the right refer to the amino acid sequence. The first residue of the mature protein (L-1) is boxed. Potential N-glycosylation sites (N-X-S/T) are denoted by psi ({Psi}). The arrow ({downarrow}) indicates the predicted GPI anchor addition site (S-73). Pig CD59 GenBank Accession no. AF020302.

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Comparison of pig CD59 protein sequence with that of human, rat, and mouse CD59. Numbering refers to the pig CD59 sequence, with the first residue of the mature protein known from protein sequencing to be L. Vertical lines ( || ) show identity of residues between pig CD59 and other species.

 
Northern blot analysis of mRNA from porcine endothelial cells indicated that pig CD59 had two major transcripts of 1.8 and 1.3 kb, which are clearly visible in Figure 4Go; two faint bands of 0.8 and 3 kb were consistently seen on a longer exposure. The 3' UTR of the longer of the sequenced clones was 312 bp, which correlates with the 0.8-kb mRNA species, but Northern blot analysis demonstrated that mRNA species with even longer 3' UTR were also present (Fig. 4Go). Northern analysis was also performed on total RNA freshly extracted from pig tissues (Fig. 4Go). Expression of pig CD59 was found in all tissues, albeit at different levels. Expression was highest in lung and spleen and was low in liver and skeletal muscle. The relative expression of the two major bands at 1.8 and 1.3 kb also varied between tissues, lung expressing similar amounts of the two, spleen expressing more of the larger band, while testis, cardiac, and skeletal muscle expressed almost none of the lower band. Probing for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) confirmed that similar amounts of RNA had been loaded for all tissues, with the exception of lung, where less RNA was loaded.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Northern blot analysis showing the relative expression of pig CD59 transcripts in different tissues detected using a cDNA radiolabeled probe derived from the coding region. A glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) probe was used as a control for comparison of loading of RNA between lanes. The lane marked "mRNA" contains mRNA isolated from cultured porcine endothelial cells. The positions of the major 1.3- and 1.8-kb transcripts are arrowed.

 
Expression of pig CD59 in a CD59-negative cell line

Stable populations of U937 cells expressing pig or human CD59 were generated, as discussed in Materials and Methods. The pDR{Delta}EF1{alpha} vector was chosen because it is reported to give comparable levels of expression of different cDNAs in a given cell type (13, 36, 37). It was therefore anticipated that similar levels of expression of human and pig CD59 would be acheived. Expression was confirmed using the mAb BRIC229 (IgG2b) for human CD59, and a new mAb raised against pig erythrocytes and conclusively shown to recognize pig CD59 (MEL-2, IgG1; Hanna et al., in preparation). Uniform high level expression was obtained for both proteins (Fig. 5Go). Neither of the mAbs recognized vector control cells, BRIC229 was negative on pig CD59-transfected cells, and MEL-2 was negative on human CD59-transfected cells. Although precise comparison of expression based upon staining with different reagents is not possible, the data suggest that pig CD59 and human CD59 were expressed at similar levels. Expression of pig CD59 on transfected U937 cells was sixfold that of endogenous CD59 on the endothelial cell line PLECT, as assessed by flow cytometry (data not included). We have shown previously that expression of human CD59 on U937 cells using this vector was approximately 10-fold higher than levels obtained on cells endogenously expressing the protein (endothelial cells and K562 cell line) (13).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Expression of pig (A) and human (B) CD59 in the U937 cell line and effect of PIPLC treatment. Transfected U937 cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with or without PIPLC (0.4 U/ml). Appropriate cells were then stained with Mel-2 (anti-pig CD59 IgG1) or BRIC229 (anti-human CD59 IgG2b) and analyzed by flow cytometry. ---, Binding of Ab to vector control cells; —— (shaded), expression of CD59; —— (nonshaded,) PIPLC treated.

 
Treatment of transfectants with PIPLC decreased expression of pig CD59 by 50%, as assessed from the mean cell fluorescence of the population, confirming that the protein was GPI anchored (Fig. 5GoA). This decrease in expression following PIPLC treatment is similar to that of human CD59 expressed on the same cell type, which decreased in mean cell fluorescence by 65% (Fig. 5GoB).

Western blotting of pig erythrocyte membranes using two different anti-pig CD59 mAb (MEL-1 IgM; MEL-2 IgG1) revealed a broad band in the Mr range of 16 to 22 kDa, and a second distinct band of 10 kDa, whereas blotting of pig CD59-expressing U937 cell membranes revealed a ladder of bands in the Mr range of 17 to 23 kDa (Fig. 6Go). Western blots using isotype-matched controls for both Abs showed no reactivity with pig erythrocyte membranes, or pig CD59-expressing U937 cells. With the exception of the distinct band at 10 kDa in pig E, these patterns closely resemble those seen for CD59 from other species and represent variable glycosylation of the CD59 (1, 8, 9, 10). Preliminary data indicate that the 10-kDa band erythrocyte band represents unglycosylated/deglycosylated CD59. Neither Ab recognized pig CD59 following reduction, a characteristic common to all anti-CD59 Abs in all species examined. There was no cross-reactivity of the anti-pig CD59 mAbs with human CD59 or of any of the available anti-human CD59 Abs (a panel of 10) with pig CD59 (data not included).



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Western blot of pig CD59-expressing U937 cells, vector-transfected U937 cells, and pig RBC (PRBC) run under nonreducing (NR) or reducing (Red) conditions using MEL-1 anti-pig CD59 IgM. Molecular weight markers are shown on the left. Identical results were obtained using a second anti-pig CD59 mAb (MEL-2 IgG1). Control blots with isotype-matched irrelevant Abs showed no binding.

 
Functional activity of pig CD59

The complement-inhibitory activity of pig CD59 expressed on U937s was evaluated, and compared with that of expressed human CD59, using a calcein-AM dye release killing assay. Transfectants expressing pig CD59, human CD59, or vector alone were Ab sensitized and incubated with sera from various species at different dilutions. These data are shown in Figure 7Go. All sera, except mouse and sheep, lysed the sensitized vector control cells readily, averaging 80% lysis at a 1/10 dilution. Mouse and sheep sera gave a maximal lysis of 56 and 67%, respectively, at a dilution of 1/10. Expressed human CD59 markedly inhibited lysis by human, pig, and sheep complement, but only moderately inhibited lysis by rodent complement, as has already been published (11, 13, 15). Expressed pig CD59 showed a pattern of protection almost identical to that of human CD59 for all species tested. In particular, pig CD59 and human CD59, expressed at similar levels in the same cell type, were equally effective at inhibiting lysis by human complement. The anti-pig CD59 mAb MEL-1 (IgM) blocks function of this molecule. Preincubation of pig CD59-expressing cells with this Ab effectively eliminated the protective effect, confirming that inhibition was due to the expressed pig CD59 (Fig. 7Go).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Classical pathway of complement-mediated killing of U937 transfectants. Calcein-AM-loaded cells were Ab sensitized and placed in 96-well plates. Cells were then incubated with varying dilutions of serum from different species. The species source is indicated in large letters at the top of each panel. Release of the fluorescent dye into the supernatant was measured on the WellFluor system and is expressed as a percentage of maximum release obtained after lysis of cells by detergent. •, Vector; {blacksquare}, human CD59; {blacktriangleup}, pig CD59; {blacklozenge}, pig CD59 with blocking mAb. Points are means of triplicate determinations ± SDs.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this work, we report the cloning of the pig analogue of human CD59, its expression in a CD59-negative cell line, and the characterization of its functional activity. The initial portion of cDNA sequence was obtained by touchdown PCR using two degenerate primers, the first designed from a region in the 38 amino acids of N-terminal sequence that we had previously obtained (10), the second designed based upon a region of high homology between human, rat, and mouse CD59 near the C terminus of the mature protein. The precise sequence of this latter region in pig CD59 was not known, so the degeneracy of this primer was high to allow for many combinations. Once this internal stretch of sequence had been determined, gene-specific primers were designed to complete the sequencing using the RACE approach. The 5' RACE reaction yielded a single specific product, while the 3' RACE reaction yielded four specific products. Two of these were sequenced and shown to be identical apart from the length of the 3' UTR; the two longer products were not sequenced, but were likely also to be pig CD59 mRNA transcripts with longer 3' UTR. The suggestion that there are several different length transcipts of pig CD59 mRNA is supported by the Northern blots that show multiple specific bands of 0.8, 1.3, 1.8, and 3 kb (Fig. 4Go). This is similar to the situation for human CD59, which has five different length transcripts of 0.7, 1.3, 1.9, 2.1, and 5.8 kb, all due to alternative polyadenylation (1, 39, 40, 41). In contrast, only a single CD59 transcript of 1.8 kb has been identified in rat CD59 (42).

The full cDNA sequence (Fig. 2Go) contains an 84-bp 5' UTR, a 372-bp coding region, and a 312-bp 3' UTR. In the 5' UTR, the 22 bp immediately 5' to the ATG start site is highly homologous between human, rat, and mouse CD59, but is not conserved in the pig CD59 sequence. The Kozak sequence (A/GNNATG), recognized by ribosomes as the translational start site and thus required for protein expression, is present within the pig CD59 5' UTR sequence. The coding region consists of a 26-amino-acid NH2-signal peptide, with leucine known to be the first residue of the mature protein sequence from the published amino acid sequence (10). Based on the consensus sequence for a GPI-anchor addition signal (38), it is predicted that the COOH-terminal 25 amino acids will be cleaved and a preformed GPI anchor attached to Ser73. The resulting 73-amino-acid mature protein is 48% identical to human CD59, 46.5% identical to rat CD59, and 38% identical to murine CD59 at the amino acid level. There are two potential N-glycosylation sites in the pig CD59 sequence, at Asn-18 and Asn-71. The former site has previously been shown by protein sequencing to be occupied (10); it is unlikely that the latter site is occupied due to its close proximity to the GPI attachment site, and thus the membrane.

It has been demonstrated by structural analysis of human CD59 that the 12 amino acids at the C terminus, following residue Cys64, have no defined structure and act like a stalk, giving mobility to the molecule (43). The predicted GPI attachment site in pig CD59 is at Ser73. The stalk of pig CD59 is thus only seven amino acids in length, the same length as that of mouse CD59, but five amino acids shorter than that of human CD59, and seven amino acids shorter than that of rat CD59. We have suggested previously that the short stalk of murine CD59 is responsible for the inefficient release of the molecule by PIPLC (13). Pig CD59 expressed on U937 is released efficiently by PIPLC treatment, although not to the same extent as human CD59 expressed on the same cell (Fig. 5Go). This indicates that the length of stalk has relatively little effect on the accessibility of the GPI anchor to the PIPLC enzyme.

Pig CD59 was stably expressed in the CD59-negative human cell line U937. Western blotting showed that the expressed pig CD59 protein was of the predicted m.w. and was glycosylated in a manner similar to that of human CD59 (Fig. 6Go). Of interest was the presence in fresh pig erythrocyte membranes of an additional form of CD59 of m.w. 10 kDa. We suggest that this form represents unglycosylated or deglycosylated CD59. We have previously observed the presence of small amounts of deglycosylated CD59 on erythrocytes in other species, particularly after prolonged storage at 4°C. The abundance of this form on fresh pig erythrocytes suggests that the protein may be more susceptible to deglycosylation in vivo than CD59 in other species.

U937 cells stably expressing either pig or human CD59 showed a single homogeneous population of high expressors by flow cytometry using appropriate mAbs. This homogeneity of expression is mediated by the elongation factor 1{alpha} promotor in the pDR{Delta}EF1{alpha} expression vector, which has previously been shown to vary little in its expression levels in a given cell (13, 37, 44). Although it is not possible to compare the relative amounts of expression of two different transfected molecules using Abs that will differ in affinities, the use of the pDR{Delta}EF1{alpha} vector ensures that human CD59 and pig CD59 are expressed at similar levels. It is likely that at the high levels of expression obtained, any differences in expression will be irrelevant. For both CD59s, the molecule is hyperexpressed (6- to 10-fold) in comparison with cells endogenously expressing CD59, mimicking the situation in transgenic organs.

The expressed pig CD59 inhibited lysis by complement from a variety of species, as previously reported with CD59 purified from pig erythrocytes (11). The pattern and extent of inhibition were almost identical to that obtained with human CD59 expressed in the same cell line. Both pig and human CD59 were very effective at inhibiting pig, human, and sheep complement, and less effective at inhibiting rodent complement (Fig. 7Go). A similar comparison between mouse and human CD59 hyperexpressed in the same vector/cell model clearly showed the poor efficiency of mouse CD59 at inhibiting human complement, demonstrating that the model will reveal species differences where they exist (13). The data suggest that the residues conferring species selectivity in human CD59 are well conserved in pig CD59, but less so in rodent CD59s. In studies of human-rat CD59 chimeras, the region of human CD59 between residues 40 and 66 has been implicated as conferring species selectivity between human and rat CD59 (15). Within this region are several residues conserved between human CD59 and pig CD59, but not conserved in rat and mouse CD59. Residues Phe47 and Lys66 (human numbering) are conserved (Ala/Gly and Ala/Phe, respectively, in rat/mouse) and there are conservative substitutions at human residues 43 (Glu->Asp), 51 (Thr->Ser), and 65 (Lys->Arg) (Ser/Ser, Leu/Met, and Gln/Gln, respectively, in rat/mouse). We therefore predict that these residues may be important in the species selectivity of CD59 molecules. Mutagenesis studies to confirm this are underway.

Expression of CD59 analogues at high levels in a CD59-negative cell line provides a model for the situation in transgenic pigs developed for xenotransplantation, in which human CD59 has been expressed at high levels in certain organs to inhibit the damage during complement attack by human serum (27, 28). Pig CD59 and human CD59, expressed at high levels in the human U937 cell line, inhibit human complement to a similar extent, indicating that in the context of pig-human transplants, overexpression of endogenous pig CD59 may also ameliorate or prevent hyperacute rejection. Whether other pig CRPs are similarly capable of efficiently inhibiting human complement remains to be determined. Pig membrane cofactor protein has recently been isolated from pig erythrocytes in this laboratory and shown to be functionally effective as a cofactor against human complement, inhibiting both the classical and alternative pathways, although the relative efficiencies of human and pig membrane cofactor proteins were not fully addressed (45). Pig decay-accelerating factor remains to be identified and characterized.

The above data provoke us to suggest that in the context of pig-human xenotransplantation, the level of expression of a particular CRP may be more important than the species in providing graft protection. Hence, hyperexpression of endogenous pig CD59, and perhaps other pig CRP in the transplanted organ would provide a similar degree of protection to that conferred by hyperexpression of human CRP in the pig. Hyperexpression of the endogenous inhibitors could be achieved by transgenesis, but there may be alternative ways of achieving this end, for example, by identifying agents that cause a large, sustained up-regulation of CRP expression on donor endothelial cells.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Brad Spiller for his help with creating the figures.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was funded by The Wellcome Trust. B.P.M. is a Wellcome Trust Senior Clinical Research Fellow. S.J.H. is the holder of a Wellcome Prize Studentship. GenBank Accession AF020302. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. B. Paul Morgan, Dept. Medical Biochemistry, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff. CF4 4XX. U.K. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; CRP, complement-regulatory protein; PIPLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C; RACE, rapid amplification of complementary deoxyribonucleic acid ends; UTR, untranslated region; VBS, veronal buffered saline. Back

Received for publication September 17, 1997. Accepted for publication December 22, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Davies, A., D. L. Simmons, G. Hale, R. A. Harrison, H. Tighe, P. J. Lachmann, H. Waldmann. 1989. CD59, an LY6-like protein expressed in human lymphoid cells, regulates the action of the complement membrane attack complex on homologous cells. J. Exp. Med. 170:637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Okada, N., R. Harada, T. Fujita, H. Okada. 1989. A novel membrane glycoprotein capable of inhibiting membrane attack by homologous complement. Int. Immunol. 1:205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sugita, Y., Y. Nakano, M. Tomita. 1988. Isolation from human erythrocytes of a new membrane protein which inhibits the formation of complement transmembrane channels. J. Biochem. 104:633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Okada, H., Y. Nagami, K. Takahashi, N. Okada, T. Hideshima, H. Takizawa, J. Kondo. 1989. 20kDa homologous restriction factor of complement resembles T-cell activating protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 162:1553.[Medline]
  5. Ninoyima, H., P. J. Sims. 1992. The human complement regulatory protein CD59 binds to the alpha chain of C8 and to the "b" domain of C9. J. Biol. Chem. 267:13675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Meri, S., B. P. Morgan, A. Davies, R. H. Daniels, M. G. Olavesen, H. Waldmann, P. J. Lachmann. 1990. Human protectin (CD59), an 18,000–20,000 MW complement lysis restricting factor, inhibits C5b-8 catalyzed insertion of C9 into lipid bilayers. Immunology 71:1.[Medline]
  7. Rollins, S. A., J. Zhao, H. Ninoyima, P. J. Sims. 1991. Inhibition of homologous complement by CD59 is mediated by a species-selective recognition conferred through binding to C8 within C5b-8 or C9 within C5b-9. J. Immunol. 146:2345.[Abstract]
  8. Hughes, T. R., S. J. Piddlesden, J. D. Williams, R. A. Harrison, B. P. Morgan. 1992. Isolation and characterization of a membrane protein from rat erythrocytes which inhibits lysis by the membrane attack complex of rat complement. Biochem. J. 284:169.
  9. Van den Berg, C. W., R. A. Harrison, B. P. Morgan. 1993. The sheep analogue of human CD59: purification and characterization of its complement inhibitory activity. Immunology 78:349.[Medline]
  10. Van den Berg, C. W., R. A. Harrison, B. P. Morgan. 1995. A rapid method for the isolation of analogues of human CD59 by preparative SDS-PAGE: application to pig CD59. J. Immunol. Methods 179:223.[Medline]
  11. Van den Berg, C. W., B. P. Morgan. 1994. Complement-inhibiting activities of human CD59 and analogues from rat, sheep and pig are not homologously restricted. J. Immunol. 152:4095.[Abstract]
  12. Rushmere, N. K., R. A. Harrison, C. W. van den Berg, B. P. Morgan. 1994. Molecular cloning of the rat analogue of human CD59: structural comparison with human CD59 and identification of a putative active site. Biochem. J. 304:595.
  13. Powell, M. B., K. J. Marchbank, N. K. Rushmere, C. W. van den Berg, B. P. Morgan. 1997. Molecular cloning, chromosomal localization, expression and functional characterization of the mouse analogue of human CD59. J. Immunol. 158:1692.[Abstract]
  14. Bodian, D. L., S. J. Davis, B. P. Morgan, N. K. Rushmere. 1997. Mutational analysis of the active site and antibody epitopes of the complement-inhibitory glycoprotein, CD59. J. Exp. Med. 185:507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Yu, J., S. Dong, N. K. Rushmere, B. P. Morgan, R. Abagayan, S. Tomlinson. 1997. Mapping the regions of the complement inhibitor CD59 responsible for its species selective activity. Biochemistry 36:9423.[Medline]
  16. White, D. J. G.. 1992. Transplantation of organs between species. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 98:1.
  17. Sandrin, M. S., H. A. Vaughan, P. L. Dabkowski, I. F. C. Mckenzie. 1993. Anti-pig IgM antibodies in human serum react predominantly with Gal({alpha}1,3)Gal epitopes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:11391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Larsen, R. D., C. A. Rivera-Marrero, L. K. Ernst, R. D. Cumming, J. B. Lowe. 1990. Frameshift and nonsense mutations in the human genomic sequence homologous to a murine UDP-Gal: ß-D-Gal(1,4)-D-GlcNAc {alpha}(1,3)-galactosyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 265:7055.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kennedy, S. P., S. A. Rollins, W. V. Burton, P. J. Sims, A. L. M. Bothwell, S. P. Squinto, G. B. Zavoico. 1994. Protection of porcine aortic endothelial cells from complement-mediated cell lysis and activation by recombinant human CD59. Transplantation 57:1494.[Medline]
  20. HecklOstreicher, B., R. Binder, M. Kirschfink. 1995. Functional activity of the membrane-associated complement inhibitor CD59 in a pig-to-human in vitro model for hyperacute xenograft rejection. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 102:589.[Medline]
  21. HecklOstreicher, B., A. Wosnik, M. Kirschfink. 1996. Protection of porcine endothelial cells from complement-mediated cytotoxicity by the human complement regulators CD59, C1 inhibitor, and soluble complement receptor type 1: analysis in a pig-to-human in vitro model relevant to hyperacute xenograft rejection. Transplantation 62:1693.[Medline]
  22. Carrington, C. A., A. C. Richards, E. Cozzi, G. Langford, N. Yannoutsos, D. J. G. White. 1995. Expression of human DAF and MCP on pig endothelial cells protects from human complement. Transplant. Proc. 27:321.[Medline]
  23. Fodor, W. L., B. L. Williams, L. A. Matis, J. A. Madri, S. A. Rollins, J. W. Knight, W. Velander, S. P. Squinto. 1994. Expression of a functional human complement inhibitor in a transgenic pig as a model for the prevention of a xenogeneic hyperacute organ rejection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Langford, G. A., N. Yannoutsos, E. Cozzi, R. Lancaster, K. Elsome, P. Chen, A. Richards, D. J. G. White. 1994. Production of pigs transgenic for human decay accelerating factor. Transplant. Proc. 26:1400.[Medline]
  25. Rosengard, A. M., N. R. B. Cary, G. A. Langford, A. W. Tucker, J. Wallwork, D. J. G. White. 1995. Tissue expression of human complement inhibitor, decay accelerating factor, in transgenic pigs: a potential approach for preventing xenograft rejection. Transplantation 59:1325.[Medline]
  26. Diamond, L. E., K. R. McCurry, M. J. Martin, S. B. McClellan, E. R. Oldham, J. L. Platt, J. S. Logan. 1996. Characterization of transgenic pigs expressing functionally active human CD59 on cardiac endothelium. Transplantation 61:1241.[Medline]
  27. Byrne, G., K. McCurry, M. Martin, J. Platt, J. Logan. 1996. Development and analysis of transgenic pigs expressing the human complement regulatory proteins CD59 and DAF. Transplant. Proc. 28:759.[Medline]
  28. Kroshus, T. J., III R. M. Bolman, A. P. Dalmasso, S. A. Rollins, E. R. Guilmette, B. L. Williams, S. P. Squinto, W. L. Fodor. 1996. Expression of human CD59 in transgenic pig organs enhances organ survival in an ex vivo xenogeneic perfusion model. Transplantation 61:1513.[Medline]
  29. Pascher, A., C. Poehlein, M. Storck, D. Aendroth, J. MuellerHoecker, W. Koenig, V. K. Young, D. J. G. White, C. Hammer. 1996. Expression of human decay accelerating factor (hDAF) in transgenic pigs regulates complement activation during ex vivo liver perfusion: immunopathological findings. Transpl. Int. 9:S385.
  30. Storck, M., D. Abendroth, R. Prestel, G. PinoChavez, J. MullerHoker, D. J. G. White, C. Hammer. 1997. Morphology of hDAF (CD55) transgenic pig kidneys following ex vivo hemoperfusion with human blood. Transplantation 63:304.[Medline]
  31. McCurry, K. R., D. L. Kooyman, C. G. Alvarado, A. M. Cotterell, M. J. Martin, J. S. Logan, J. L. Platt. 1995. Human complement regulatory proteins protect swine-to-primate cardiac xenografts from humoral injury. Nat. Med. 1:423.[Medline]
  32. Byrne, G. W., K. R. McCurry, M. J. Martin, S. M. McClellan, J. L. Platt, J. S. Logan. 1997. Transgenic pigs expressing human CD59 and decay-accelerating factor produce an intrinsic barrier to complement-mediated damage. Transplantation 63:149.[Medline]
  33. Van den Berg, C. W., O. M. Williams, B. P. Morgan. 1994. Presence of a dysfunctional form of CD59 on a CD59+ subclone of the U937 cell line. Immunology 81:637.[Medline]
  34. Don, R. H., P. T. Cox, P. J. Wainwright, K. Baker, J. S. Mattick. 1991. "Touchdown" PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:4008.[Free Full Text]
  35. Frohman, M. A.. 1990. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications 28.-38. Academic Press, London.
  36. Charreau, B., A. Cassard, L. Tesson, B. Le Mauff, J.-M. Navenot, D. Blanchard, D. Lublin, J.-P. Soulillou, I. Anegon. 1994. Protection of rat endothelial cells from primate complement-mediated lysis by expression of human CD59 and/or decay accelerating factor. Transplantation 58:1222.[Medline]
  37. Mizushima, S., S. Nagata. 1990. pEF-BOS, a powerful mammalian expression vector. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:5322.[Free Full Text]
  38. Gerber, L. D., K. Kodukula, S. Udenfriend. 1992. Phosphatidylinositol glycan (PI-G) anchored membrane proteins: amino acid requirements adjacent to the site of cleavage and PI-G attachment in the COOH-terminal signal peptide. J. Biol. Chem. 267:12168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Philbrick, W. M., R. G. E. Palfree, S. E. Maher, M. M. Bridgett, S. Sirlin, A. L. M. Bothwell. 1990. The CD59 antigen is a structural homologue of murine Ly-6 antigens but lacks interferon inducibility. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:87.[Medline]
  40. Sawada, R., K. Ohashi, H. Anaguchi, H. Okazaki, M. Hattori, N. Minato, M. Naruto. 1990. Isolation and expression of the full length cDNA encoding CD59 antigen of human lymphocytes. DNA Cell Biol. 9:213.[Medline]
  41. Tone, M., L. A. Walsh, H. Waldmann. 1992. Gene structure of human CD59 and demonstration that discrete mRNAs are generated by alternative polyadenylation. J. Mol. Biol. 227:971.[Medline]
  42. Quigg, R. J., B. P. Morgan, V. M. Holers, S. Adler, III A. E. Sneed, C. F. Lo. 1995. Complement regulation in the rat glomerulus: Crry and CD59 regulate complement in glomerular mesangial and endothelial cells. Kidney Int. 48:412.[Medline]
  43. Fletcher, C. M., R. A. Harrison, P. J. Lachmann, D. Neuhaus. 1994. Structure of a soluble, glycosylated form of the complement regulatory protein CD59. Structure 2:185.[Medline]
  44. Tripathy, S. K., E. Goldwasser, M.-M. Lu, E. Barr, J. M. Leiden. 1994. Stable delivery of physiologic levels of recombinant erythropoietin to the systemic circulation by intramuscular injection of replication-defective adenovirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Van den Berg, C. W., J. M. Perez de la Lastra, D. Llanes, B. P. Morgan. 1997. Purification and characterization of the pig analogue of human membrane cofactor protein (CD46/MCP). J. Immunol. 158:1703.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J BiochemHome page
C. Kobayashi, K. Matsunami, T. Omori, S. Nakatsu, K. Nakahata, H. Xu, R. Shirakura, M. Fukuzawa, and S. Miyagawa
Features of a Newly Cloned Pig C1 Esterase Inhibitor
J. Biochem., September 1, 2006; 140(3): 421 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Dufour, M. Hamilton, R. V. Rajotte, and G. S. Korbutt
Neonatal Porcine Sertoli Cells Inhibit Human Natural Antibody-Mediated Lysis
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2005; 72(5): 1224 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. van Beek, M. van Meurs, B. A. 't Hart, H. P. M. Brok, J. W. Neal, A. Chatagner, C. L. Harris, N. Omidvar, B. P. Morgan, J. D. Laman, et al.
Decay-Accelerating Factor (CD55) Is Expressed by Neurons in Response to Chronic but Not Acute Autoimmune Central Nervous System Inflammation Associated with Complement Activation
J. Immunol., February 15, 2005; 174(4): 2353 - 2365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Cascalho, B. M. Ogle, and J. L. Platt
Xenotransplantation and the Future of Renal Replacement
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2004; 15(5): 1106 - 1112.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. LeBouder, J. E. Rey-Nores, N. K. Rushmere, M. Grigorov, S. D. Lawn, M. Affolter, G. E. Griffin, P. Ferrara, E. J. Schiffrin, B. P. Morgan, et al.
Soluble Forms of Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)2 Capable of Modulating TLR2 Signaling Are Present in Human Plasma and Breast Milk
J. Immunol., December 15, 2003; 171(12): 6680 - 6689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y.-M. Qian, X. Qin, T. Miwa, X. Sun, J. A. Halperin, and W.-C. Song
Identification and Functional Characterization of a New Gene Encoding the Mouse Terminal Complement Inhibitor CD59
J. Immunol., September 1, 2000; 165(5): 2528 - 2534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. M. Perez de la Lastra, C. L. Harris, S. J. Hinchliffe, D. S. Holt, N. K. Rushmere, and B. P. Morgan
Pigs Express Multiple Forms of Decay-Accelerating Factor (CD55), All of Which Contain Only Three Short Consensus Repeats
J. Immunol., September 1, 2000; 165(5): 2563 - 2573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. P. Dalmasso, B. A. Benson, J. S. Johnson, C. Lancto, and M. S. Abrahamsen
Resistance Against the Membrane Attack Complex of Complement Induced in Porcine Endothelial Cells with a Gal{alpha}(1-3)Gal Binding Lectin: Up-Regulation of CD59 Expression
J. Immunol., April 1, 2000; 164(7): 3764 - 3773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H.-f. Zhang, J. Yu, S. Chen, B. P. Morgan, R. Abagyan, and S. Tomlinson
Identification of the Individual Residues That Determine Human CD59 Species Selective Activity
J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 1999; 274(16): 10969 - 10974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Basta, S. M. Knoetig, M. Spagnuolo-Weaver, G. Allan, and K. C. McCullough
Modulation of Monocytic Cell Activity and Virus Susceptibility During Differentiation into Macrophages
J. Immunol., April 1, 1999; 162(7): 3961 - 3969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Sun, C. D. Funk, C. Deng, A. Sahu, J. D. Lambris, and W.-C. Song
Role of decay-accelerating factor in regulating complement activation on the erythrocyte surface as revealed by gene targeting
PNAS, January 19, 1999; 96(2): 628 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hinchliffe, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hinchliffe, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, B. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS