|
|
||||||||



*
Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; and
Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The alternative pathway is considered to be an important part of the nonspecific defense system against infection (14). A major effect of complement activation through the alternative pathway is to enhance phagocytosis of microorganisms on which C3b has been deposited (15). To avoid this host defense system, a variety of microorganisms has developed strategies to minimize C3b deposition. For example, it is well known that group A streptococci express type-specific surface proteins called M proteins, which act as major virulence factors for the organism by protecting it from phagocytosis (16). There is evidence that one mechanism by which M proteins exert their antiphagocytic effect is through the prevention of complement activation and opsonization (17). Indeed, several strains of group A streptococci have been shown to bind FH, thereby down-regulating C3 deposition on the streptococcal surface (18). This finding suggests that FH plays an important role in the resistance of group A streptococci to phagocytosis. However, some group A streptococcal strains may not bind FH, but bind the complement regulator C4b-binding protein (C4BP), a plasma protein that preferentially inhibits complement activation via the classical pathway (19, 20, 21). Thus, available data suggest that strains of group A streptococci bind at least one important serum regulator of complement activation, FH or C4BP.
In this work, we report a study of the interaction between FH, the structurally related FHL-1, and streptococcal M protein. Previous work has shown that purified M6 protein binds to FH (18), and FH deletion mutants were used recently to map a binding site for the M6 protein to the region encompassing SCR 610 (22). We now present evidence that two different M proteins, M5 and M6, not only bind FH but also bind FHL-1, and that their interaction with M proteins requires SCR 7, a domain common to both complement regulatory proteins.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The type M5 group A streptococcal strain Manfredo (23) was provided by Dr. Michael Kehoe (University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, U.K.). The M6 protein-expressing group A streptococcal strain JRS4, and its derivative JRS145, in which the emm6 gene has been deleted (24), were obtained from Dr. June Scott, Emory University (Atlanta, GA). The plasmid pLM02, a derivative of pBR322 carrying the entire emm5 gene (23), was kindly provided by Dr. M. Kehoe. The plasmid pLZ12spec is an Escherichia coli-streptococcal shuttle vector carrying a spectinomycin-resistance marker (25). Streptococci were grown in Todd-Hewitt broth (Difco, Detroit, MI), in 5% CO2 at 37°C for 16 h. Streptococci transformed with pLZ12spec, or derivatives thereof, were grown in medium supplemented with spectinomycin at 100 mg/L. E. coli LE392 transformed with pLZ12spec was grown in LB medium, supplemented with spectinomycin at 20 mg/L.
Binding of radiolabeled ligands to streptococci
For binding studies, streptococci were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice in PBSA (0.15 M NaCl, 0.03 M phosphate, 0.02% sodium azide, pH 7.2), and were finally resuspended in PBSA supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20. Dilutions were made with PBSA containing the nonbinding E. coli strain LE392 at 2 x 109 bacteria/ml. The binding of radiolabeled proteins to bacteria, at different dilutions, was measured in a total volume of 250 µl PBSA, supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20. Following incubation for 1 h at 20°C, the samples were centrifuged (4000 x g, 10 min), the supernatant was discarded, and the remaining pellet was washed in 2 ml PBSA containing 0.05% Tween-20. After centrifugation and removal of the supernatant, the radioactivity associated with the pellet was measured in a gamma counter.
Plasma absorption experiments
Streptococci (1 x 1010 cells) were resuspended in 1.5 ml of fresh human plasma containing 0.34 M EDTA. Following incubation for 1 h at 20°C, the bacterial cells were pelleted, and washed three times with PBSA containing 0.05% Tween-20. After a final centrifugation, proteins bound to the bacteria were eluted by incubation with 0.1 M glycine-HCl, pH 2, for 15 min. The bacteria were removed by centrifugation (10,000 x g, 5 min), and the proteins in the supernatant were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot experiments.
Transcomplementation with the emm5 gene
The plasmid pLM02 that carries the entire emm5 gene was used to construct plasmid pKEJ1, as described (20). A 2.1-kb EcoRI/SphI fragment of pKEJ1 with the emm5 gene was inserted into pLZ12spec, resulting in plasmid pLZM5. pLZM5 was transformed into E. coli LE392, and finally transformed into the emm-negative strain JRS145.
Recombinant DNA techniques
Standard rDNA techniques were used (26). Ligase and restriction enzymes were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). Transformation of E. coli was performed by the CaCl2 method (26). Electroporation of streptococci was conducted as described (27).
Proteins and antisera
The M5 protein was purified from E. coli transformed with pLM02, using whole cell lysates, as described (20). rEnn4 protein was produced and purified as described (20). The surface protein Rib was isolated from group B streptococci, as described (28). Human fibrinogen was from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). Cloning and expression of rSCR 17 (rFHL-1), SCR 16, and SCR 15 fragments using the baculovirus system have been described previously (12, 29). The fragments had been fitted with histidine tags, allowing their purification by Ni2+, metal affinity chromatography (12). The cloning and expression of the FHR-3 and FHR-4 proteins in the baculovirus system have been described (30, 31) (P. F. Zipfel, manuscript in preparation).
Preparation of polyclonal rabbit antisera against FH and SCR 14 and generation of a mAb (mAb VIG8), specific for an epitope in SCR 1920 of FH, have been described (12, 32).4
Protein analysis, competitive binding experiments, and determination of affinity constants
Proteins were labeled with 125I, using the chloramine-T method (33). The homogeneity of the radiolabeled proteins was checked by autoradiography after separation by SDS-PAGE. SDS-PAGE, under reducing conditions, was performed as described (34). For immunoblot analysis, the proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Imobilon; Millipore, Bedford, MA). The membranes were blocked with blocking buffer (PBSA containing 0.25% gelatin, 0.25% Tween-20), and incubated with antiserum diluted in blocking buffer as indicated. The membranes were then incubated with 125I-labeled protein G (2 x 105 cpm/ml corresponding to approximately 10 ng/ml), in blocking buffer, and were finally washed in blocking buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl.
For competitive binding experiments, microtiter plates (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) were used. The wells were coated overnight at 4°C with 50 µl of the M5 protein solution (1 µg/ml in PBS). The following day, the wells were washed three times with PBSA containing 0.05% Tween-20, and then incubated for 2 h at 4°C with 100 µl blocking buffer. A mixture of the radiolabeled ligand and unlabeled protein, or heparin (25,000 IU/ml; Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ), in a total volume of 50 µl blocking buffer, was added to the wells and the plate was incubated for 6 h at 4°C. Finally, the wells were washed four times with PBSA containing 0.05% Tween-20, and the radioactivity in the wells was counted in a gamma counter. Nonspecific binding to wells was analyzed by measuring the binding of radiolabeled proteins to uncoated wells.
Association and dissociation rate constants for binding of FH and FHL-1 to purified M5 protein were determined by surface plasmon resonance using a Biacore-X equipment, following the instructions supplied by the manufacturer. The M5 protein was resuspended in 10 mM sodium acetate (pH 3) and was coupled to CM-5 sensor chips using amine-coupling chemistry. The chips were regenerated using 30 mM HCl. Association and dissociation rates were measured at 25°C with a continuous flow rate of 20 µl/min, using PBS with 0.05% Tween-20 as buffer, and with FH at concentrations varying from 125 to 500 µg/ml or FHL-1 at concentrations from 7 to 60 µg/ml. The evaluation was done separately for the association and dissociation rate constants using a 1:1 model for the association with the Biaevaluation 3.0 software.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several strains of group A streptococci have been shown to bind
purified FH. For type M6 streptococci, this interaction has been
demonstrated to occur through the surface-exposed M6 protein (18, 22, 35, 36). To investigate whether FH was also capable of binding to
streptococci in a physiologic setting, two group A streptococcal
strains, the M5 protein-expressing strain Manfredo and the M6
protein-expressing strain JRS4, were incubated with plasma supplemented
with 0.34 M EDTA to prevent complement activation. After extensive
washing, absorbed proteins were eluted using 0.1 M glycine-HCl, pH 2.
The eluted proteins were analyzed by Western blot experiments, using
rabbit anti-FH antiserum as the probe. The antiserum reacted with a
150-kDa protein corresponding to FH, showing that M protein-expressing
bacteria are able to absorb this complement regulator from plasma (Fig. 1
A, lanes 1 and
4).
|
|
Although the experiments described above were performed in
EDTA-plasma, it could not be excluded that the deposition of FHL-1 (and
FH) was secondary to complement activation on the streptococcal
surface. To address this issue, a recombinant baculovirus-produced and
functionally active form of FHL-1 was analyzed for its ability to bind
to group A streptococci. Indeed, radiolabeled rFHL-1 bound to M5
protein-expressing streptococci (Fig. 3
A). Moreover, rFHL-1
did not bind to the M-negative strain JRS145, but bound to JRS145
expressing the M5 protein. Thus, the binding of rFHL-1 was mediated by
M protein.
|
FHL-1 and FH bind to purified streptococcal M5 protein
The interaction between rFHL-1 and FH with the M5 protein was
further analyzed with purified components. In Western blot experiments,
rFHL-1 bound to purified rM5 protein (Fig. 4
A). The interaction
was specific, since rFHL-1 failed to bind rEnn4, another group A
streptococcal surface protein belonging to the M protein family, or
protein Rib, a group B streptococcal surface protein (Fig. 4
A). 125I-labeled (rFHL-1) also bound to
M5 protein immobilized in the wells of microtiter plates. The binding
could be blocked completely by rFHL-1, but was inhibited only partially
by rSCR 16, although added in a 1000-fold molar excess (Fig. 4
B).
|
|
The data presented above indicated that SCR 7 is of major
importance for the binding of FH and FHL-1 to streptococcal M proteins.
Further support for this conclusion was obtained in binding experiments
with two FHR proteins, designated FHR-3 (30) and FHR-4 (31). FHR-3
contains a domain that is highly similar to SCR 7 of FH and FHL-1,
whereas FHR-4 lacks such a domain (Fig. 2
B). Both
proteins also contain a domain similar to SCR 6 of FH. In these
experiments, 125I-rFHR-3 bound to M protein-expressing
group A streptococci as efficiently as 125I-rFHL-1, whereas
125I-rFHR-4 failed to show any binding at all (Fig. 5
).
|
FH is known to bind heparin, and a major binding site for this
ligand was localized recently to SCR 7 (37). Since our data indicated
that streptococcal M proteins also bind in SCR 7, it was of interest to
analyze whether the heparin- and M protein-binding sites in FHL-1
overlap. Therefore, heparin was used in various concentrations to
inhibit the binding of 125I-rFHL-1 to purified M5
protein immobilized in microtiter wells. Interestingly, heparin was
found to inhibit the interaction between FHL-1 and the M5 protein (Fig. 6
). This interaction was not unspecific
since heparin did not inhibit the interaction between fibrinogen and
the M5 protein (Fig. 6
). These data provide further evidence for the
involvement of SCR 7 in the interaction between FH and FHL-1.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although FHL-1 is an alternative splice product of the FH gene, the description "novel" for the interaction with M protein appears justified since accumulated evidence suggests that FH and FHL-1 have different properties. Thus, although these two proteins have similar cofactor activity, FHL-1 has a lower decay-accelerating activity (13). Moreover, FHL-1 is capable of promoting the spreading and attachment of eukaryotic cells as a consequence of its cell-binding activity, a property that is not displayed by FH (38). The finding that FHL-1 was absorbed from plasma by M protein-expressing group A streptococci as efficiently as FH, although circulating in a 10- to 50-fold lower concentration, also supports the conclusion that FHL-1 and FH have different properties. A possible explanation for this situation is provided by structural analyses of FH showing that SCRs may interact with one another and that FH can fold back on itself, thereby changing the functional properties of the molecule (39). However, there is no evidence that FH and FHL-1 do not use the same SCR(s) to interact with M protein.
Apart from identifying FHL-1 as a new M protein ligand with complement regulatory activity, the results presented in this work extend recent findings by Sharma and Pangburn (22), who showed that SCR 610 of FH are required for M protein binding. Since FHL-1 encompasses the first seven SCRs of FH, the region required for binding of M protein could be narrowed down to SCR 67. The finding that rSCR 16 did not bind to M protein demonstrated that SCR 7 is required for the binding, but did not exclude that SCR 6 is also required. However, two observations indicate that SCR 7 is more important than SCR 6 for the binding to M protein. First, the binding of radiolabeled FHL-1 to the M protein was inhibited almost completely by unlabeled FHL-1, while unlabeled rSCR 16 only caused a very limited inhibition. Second, the results obtained with rFHR-3 and rFHR-4, two other members of the FH family, also indicate that SCR 7 is crucial for the interaction. Indeed, binding to M5 protein-expressing streptococci was observed for FHR-3, which has an SCR 7-like domain, while FHR-4, which lacks such a domain, did not bind.
A major heparin-binding site has previously been localized to SCR 7 of FH (37). The inhibition tests reported in this work indicate that this heparin-binding site overlaps with, or is identical to, the M protein-binding site in SCR 7. Taken together, these data indicate that SCR 7 plays a key role in the function of FHL-1 (and FH), since this SCR domain may promote binding to surfaces coated with heparin or M protein. Since the complement regulatory activity of FH and FHL-1 resides in SCR 14 (11, 12, 13), it seems likely that FH and FHL-1 that has bound via SCR 7 retain the ability to down-regulate the alternative pathway. Thus, an interaction with FH or FHL-1, mediated through SCR 7, may provide surfaces, such as those provided by M protein-expressing streptococci, with protection against complement attack.
The finding that heparin and M proteins compete for the same binding site in FHL-1 may have consequences for the interpretation of data obtained in the phagocytosis assay widely used for assessing the function of M proteins (16). Since this assay is conducted routinely in heparin-containing blood, results obtained in this system may be influenced by the presence of heparin (40). Therefore, other methods to achieve anticoagulation should be considered, particularly when the phagocytosis assay is used to analyze the role of SCR-containing ligands. Indeed, a recent study indicates that the procedure used to prevent coagulation in phagocytosis experiments can influence the results (41).
In summary, we have presented evidence that the binding of FH and FHL-1 to streptococcal M proteins requires SCR 7. Further studies of this interaction are of obvious interest from the point of view of streptococcal pathogenesis. In addition, studies of this interaction may help in dissecting the various functions displayed by different SCR regions in FH and FHL-1.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ulf Sjöbring, Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 23, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: FH, complement factor H; C4BP, complement factor 4b-binding protein; FHL-1, factor H-like protein-1; FHR, factor H-related protein; 125I-FHL-1, 125I-labeled factor H-like protein-1; 125I-FHR, 125I-labeled factor H-related protein; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; SCR, short consensus repeat. ![]()
4 W. M. Prodinger, J. Hellwage, M. Spruth, M. P. Dierich, and P. F. Zipfel. The C-terminus of factor H: monoclonal antibodies inhibit heparin binding and identify epitopes common to factor H and factor H-related proteins. Submitted for publication. ![]()
Received for publication July 18, 1997. Accepted for publication December 5, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Biedzka-Sarek, H. Jarva, H. Hyytiainen, S. Meri, and M. Skurnik Characterization of Complement Factor H Binding to Yersinia enterocolitica Serotype O:3 Infect. Immun., September 1, 2008; 76(9): 4100 - 4109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Hovis, J. C. Freedman, H. Zhang, J. L. Forbes, and R. T. Marconi Identification of an Antiparallel Coiled-Coil/Loop Domain Required for Ligand Binding by the Borrelia hermsii FhbA Protein: Additional Evidence for the Role of FhbA in the Host-Pathogen Interaction Infect. Immun., May 1, 2008; 76(5): 2113 - 2122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Ormsby, S. Ranganathan, J. C. Tong, K. M. Griggs, D. P. Dimasi, A. W. Hewitt, K. P. Burdon, J. E. Craig, J. Hoh, and D. L. Gordon Functional and Structural Implications of the Complement Factor H Y402H Polymorphism Associated with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 1763 - 1770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Behnsen, A. Hartmann, J. Schmaler, A. Gehrke, A. A. Brakhage, and P. F. Zipfel The Opportunistic Human Pathogenic Fungus Aspergillus fumigatus Evades the Host Complement System Infect. Immun., February 1, 2008; 76(2): 820 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Poltermann, A. Kunert, M. von der Heide, R. Eck, A. Hartmann, and P. F. Zipfel Gpm1p Is a Factor H-, FHL-1-, and Plasminogen-binding Surface Protein of Candida albicans J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37537 - 37544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Herzberger, C. Siegel, C. Skerka, V. Fingerle, U. Schulte-Spechtel, A. van Dam, B. Wilske, V. Brade, P. F. Zipfel, R. Wallich, et al. Human Pathogenic Borrelia spielmanii sp. nov. Resists Complement-Mediated Killing by Direct Binding of Immune Regulators Factor H and Factor H-Like Protein 1 Infect. Immun., October 1, 2007; 75(10): 4817 - 4825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kunert, J. Losse, C. Gruszin, M. Huhn, K. Kaendler, S. Mikkat, D. Volke, R. Hoffmann, T. S. Jokiranta, H. Seeberger, et al. Immune Evasion of the Human Pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Elongation Factor Tuf Is a Factor H and Plasminogen Binding Protein J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 2979 - 2988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. von Lackum, J. C. Miller, T. Bykowski, S. P. Riley, M. E. Woodman, V. Brade, P. Kraiczy, B. Stevenson, and R. Wallich Borrelia burgdorferi Regulates Expression of Complement Regulator-Acquiring Surface Protein 1 during the Mammal-Tick Infection Cycle Infect. Immun., November 1, 2005; 73(11): 7398 - 7405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wei, V. Pandiripally, E. Gregory, M. Clymer, and D. Cue Impact of the SpeB Protease on Binding of the Complement Regulatory Proteins Factor H and Factor H-Like Protein 1 by Streptococcus pyogenes Infect. Immun., April 1, 2005; 73(4): 2040 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Biedzka-Sarek, R. Venho, and M. Skurnik Role of YadA, Ail, and Lipopolysaccharide in Serum Resistance of Yersinia enterocolitica Serotype O:3 Infect. Immun., April 1, 2005; 73(4): 2232 - 2244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wallich, J. Pattathu, V. Kitiratschky, C. Brenner, P. F. Zipfel, V. Brade, M. M. Simon, and P. Kraiczy Identification and Functional Characterization of Complement Regulator-Acquiring Surface Protein 1 of the Lyme Disease Spirochetes Borrelia afzelii and Borrelia garinii Infect. Immun., April 1, 2005; 73(4): 2351 - 2359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Miyagawa, T. Kubo, K. Matsunami, T. Kusama, K. Beppu, H. Nozaki, T. Moritan, C. Ahn, J. Y. Kim, D. Fukuta, et al. Delta-Short Consensus Repeat 4-Decay Accelerating Factor (DAF: CD55) Inhibits Complement-Mediated Cytolysis but Not NK Cell-Mediated Cytolysis J. Immunol., September 15, 2004; 173(6): 3945 - 3952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kimura, N. Inoue, A. Fukui, H. Oshiumi, M. Matsumoto, M. Nonaka, S. Kuratani, T. Fujita, M. Nonaka, and T. Seya A Short Consensus Repeat-Containing Complement Regulatory Protein of Lamprey That Participates in Cleavage of Lamprey Complement 3 J. Immunol., July 15, 2004; 173(2): 1118 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Weineisen, U. Sjobring, M. Fallman, and T. Andersson Streptococcal M5 Protein Prevents Neutrophil Phagocytosis by Interfering with CD11b/CD18 Receptor-Mediated Association and Signaling J. Immunol., March 15, 2004; 172(6): 3798 - 3807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kraiczy, J. Hellwage, C. Skerka, H. Becker, M. Kirschfink, M. M. Simon, V. Brade, P. F. Zipfel, and R. Wallich Complement Resistance of Borrelia burgdorferi Correlates with the Expression of BbCRASP-1, a Novel Linear Plasmid-encoded Surface Protein That Interacts with Human Factor H and FHL-1 and Is Unrelated to Erp Proteins J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2004; 279(4): 2421 - 2429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Pandiripally, L. Wei, C. Skerka, P. F. Zipfel, and D. Cue Recruitment of Complement Factor H-Like Protein 1 Promotes Intracellular Invasion by Group A Streptococci Infect. Immun., December 1, 2003; 71(12): 7119 - 7128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Pandiripally, E. Gregory, and D. Cue Acquisition of Regulators of Complement Activation by Streptococcus pyogenes Serotype M1 Infect. Immun., November 1, 2002; 70(11): 6206 - 6214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Pangburn Cutting Edge: Localization of the Host Recognition Functions of Complement Factor H at the Carboxyl-Terminal: Implications for Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome J. Immunol., November 1, 2002; 169(9): 4702 - 4706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Meri, A. Hartmann, D. Lenk, R. Eck, R. Wurzner, J. Hellwage, S. Meri, and P. F. Zipfel The Yeast Candida albicans Binds Complement Regulators Factor H and FHL-1 Infect. Immun., September 1, 2002; 70(9): 5185 - 5192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Giannakis, T. S. Jokiranta, R. J. Ormsby, T. G. Duthy, D. A. Male, D. Christiansen, V. A. Fischetti, C. Bagley, B. E. Loveland, and D. L. Gordon Identification of the Streptococcal M Protein Binding Site on Membrane Cofactor Protein (CD46) J. Immunol., May 1, 2002; 168(9): 4585 - 4592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Areschoug, M. Stalhammar-Carlemalm, I. Karlsson, and G. Lindahl Streptococcal beta Protein Has Separate Binding Sites for Human Factor H and IgA-Fc J. Biol. Chem., April 5, 2002; 277(15): 12642 - 12648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jarva, R. Janulczyk, J. Hellwage, P. F. Zipfel, L. Bjorck, and S. Meri Streptococcus pneumoniae Evades Complement Attack and Opsonophagocytosis by Expressing the pspC Locus-Encoded Hic Protein That Binds to Short Consensus Repeats 8-11 of Factor H J. Immunol., February 15, 2002; 168(4): 1886 - 1894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kraiczy, C. Skerka, V. Brade, and P. F. Zipfel Further Characterization of Complement Regulator-Acquiring Surface Proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi Infect. Immun., December 1, 2001; 69(12): 7800 - 7809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |