The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandberg, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kärre, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandberg, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kärre, K.
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 3163-3169.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Superdominance Among Immunodominant H-2Kb-Restricted Epitopes and Reversal by Dendritic Cell-Mediated Antigen Delivery1

Johan K. Sandberg2, Per Grufman, Elisabeth Z. Wolpert, Lars Franksson, Benedict J. Chambers and Klas Kärre

Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To examine possible interference patterns between immunodominant CTL Ags, we analyzed the response to mixtures of five well-characterized H-2Kb-restricted epitopes, each of which had earlier been described as immunodominant within its antigenic system. Clear patterns of dominance were observed between peptides in the mixture, with the CTL response focusing on the Sendai virus nucleoprotein 324–332 and vesicular stomatitis virus nucleoprotein 52–59 epitopes. The dominance of these epitopes correlated with high CTL availability. Subdominance of the OVA257–264 and the MCF1233 murine leukemia virus envelope 574–581 peptides could not be explained by inferior ability to bind and stabilize MHC class I molecules. Interestingly, immunodominance was broken if the peptide mixture was pulsed on bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, a mode of immunization allowing efficient recognition of a broader set of specificities. Our results show that immunodominance is neither an absolute feature of a given epitope nor does it apply only in relation to other epitopes within the same protein, micro-organism, or cell. Novel "superdominant" hierarchies emerge in the response against multiple "dominant" epitopes. A T cell competition model to explain the data in terms of a balance influenced by CTL frequencies and available APC capacity is discussed.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CD8+ T cells recognize 8- to 10-amino acid-long peptide fragments presented on the cell surface in complex with MHC class I molecules (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). The specific peptide ligands displayed are derived predominantly from intracellular proteins, enabling the CD8+ T cells to detect intracellular infection or malignant transformation (6). Specific MHC binding motifs (consensus motifs) that are associated with, but neither absolutely necessary nor sufficient for high affinity binding and CTL recognition, have been defined for class I-presented peptides, making prediction of CTL epitopes possible (7). The understanding of the central role of antigenic peptide fragments in the cell-mediated immune response has opened the possibility of using the corresponding synthetic peptides as vaccines (8), and there are numerous reports on induction of protective immunity against viruses (9, 10, 11) and tumors (12, 13, 14, 15, 16) using this approach.

Although many Ags carry several potential CTL epitopes, only one or a few are selected by the immune response in vivo, a phenomenon known as immunodominance (17). The major epitope(s) chosen by T cells in complex Ags are called immunodominant. Apart from the dominant epitope(s), complex Ags such as proteins, cells, or micro-organisms harbor a hierarchical array of subdominant and/or cryptic epitopes (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). Both of these terms have been used operationally to define intrinsically immunogenic epitopes that fail to induce a response when introduced within a more complex antigenic challenge (17, 19, 21). According to a recent mechanistic classification proposed for class I-presented peptides, the term subdominant refer to epitopes that are processed and presented; they can elicit a response, but fail to do so in the presence of other "dominant" epitopes (22, 23). The term cryptic is then reserved for epitopes that are not presented. This may be accounted for by any of a number of mechanisms operating at the level of intracellular Ag processing. Peptide selection for cell surface expression can thus be influenced by proteasomal cleavage specificity (24, 25, 26) and protein sequences flanking the potential epitopes (27), as well as TAP-peptide transport preferences (28, 29, 30, 31) and peptide competition for binding to the MHC class I molecule (21). The life span of MHC-peptide complexes, after they have arrived at the cell surface, influences the immunogenicity of potential epitopes (32). However, immunodominance can also be influenced by the available T cell repertoire (33, 34, 35) and the cytokine milieu (36).

A major limitation in the development of peptide vaccines is the extensive polymorphism in the human MHC loci. Additionally, immunity to antigenic variants and strains of pathogens may not be achieved using a single peptide. Thus, effective coverage of the human population will most probably need the inclusion of several epitopes. After good candidate peptides have been identified, the vaccine can be delivered loaded on APC, mixed with adjuvant, or as lipopeptides. Recently, peptides loaded on dendritic cells (DC)3 has proved particularly efficient in the induction of protective CTL immunity (12, 13).

To address the mechanisms of immunodominance in MHC class I-restricted T cell responses, as well as the functionality of multiepitope peptide vaccines, we analyzed the CTL response to mixtures of five well-characterized H-2Kb-restricted epitopes, each of which has been described as immunodominant within its antigenic system (11, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41). Clear patterns of dominance among the five epitopes were observed, and the dominance was abrogated when DC were employed for Ag delivery. Our results have important implications for the understanding of immunodominance in T cell responses and for future vaccine development.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice and cell lines

C57BL/6 (B6) mice were bred and maintained at the Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Animal care was in accordance with institutional guidelines. Mice were used at 6 to 10 wk of age. The RMA-S cell line, a TAP2-deficient derivative of the Rauscher virus-induced T cell lymphoma RBL-5 of B6 (H-2b) origin (42), was maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 tissue culture medium supplemented with 5% FCS, 50 µg streptomycin/ml, 100 µg penicillin/ml, and 2 mM L-glutamine.

Synthetic peptides

Synthetic peptides corresponding to the following epitopes were synthesized by the solid phase method using F-moc chemistry, purified by reverse phase HPLC, and analyzed by electrospray mass spectrometry: vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) NP52–59 RGYVYQGL (37); Sendai virus (SV) NP324–332 FAPGNYPAL (11, 38); mink cell focus-inducing murine leukemia virus (MCF) 1233 env574–581 KSPWFTTL (39); mutated Ras (mRas) 59–67 AGLEEYSAM (40); and OVA257–264 SIINFEKL (41).

Generation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells

Bone marrow-derived DC were obtained from B6 mice using the protocol of Inaba et al. (43) with the following alterations. Bone marrow cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% supernatant from the granulocyte-macrophage CSF-secreting cell line X63 (a gift from Dr. D. Gray through Dr. C. Watts, University of Dundee, Dundee, U.K.) and 20% FCS. The culture medium was replaced every third day, and the cells were replated on day 7.

Peptide immunization and generation of peptide-specific CTL

B6 mice were immunized through one of three different routes. 1) 0.1 µmol (approximately 100 µg) peptide was dissolved in 0.1 ml distilled water, mixed with 0.1 ml IFA by sonication, and injected s.c. in the base of the tail (44, 45). 2) 10 x 106 B6 spleen cells were incubated at 37°C with 10 µM of relevant peptides for 2 h in serum-free RPMI 1640, washed twice, irradiated with 2000 rad, and inoculated i.v. (46). 3) 1 x 105 B6 DC were incubated at 37°C with 30 µM of relevant peptides for 2 h in serum-free DMEM, washed twice, and injected s.c. (13). Nine to twelve days after immunization through the IFA and DC routes or 3 wk after immunization through the splenocyte route, 25 x 106 immune spleen cells were cocultured with 25 x 106 irradiated B6 spleen cells in the presence of 0.1 µM of relevant peptides in 12 ml of complete medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 mg streptomycin/ml, and 100 mg penicillin/ml) at 37°C and 5% CO2. Five days later, these cells were used as effectors in a 51Cr release CTL assay (see below).

Limiting dilution assay for CTL frequency in vivo

At 9 to 12 days after immunization with peptide in IFA, immune B6 splenocytes were titrated in U-bottom 96-well plates using 60 wells at each dilution, together with 105 2000 rad-irradiated B6 splenocytes and 0.1 µM peptide. Medium was supplemented with 20 IU/ml IL-2 and 5% MLC supernatant. An 8-h 51Cr release assay was performed after 6 days, at which time RMA-S target cells coated with peptide were added to 40 wells and RMA-S without peptide were added to 20 wells to measure the nonspecific release. Positive wells were defined as those wells for which 51Cr release levels exceeded the mean nonspecific release level by more than three times its SD. The in vivo CTL frequency was estimated by linear regression calculation (47).

H-2Kb peptide stabilization assay

RMA-S cells were incubated overnight at 26°C in complete medium with titrated concentrations of peptide followed by a 45-min chase at 37°C. Cells were then stained with FITC-conjugated anti-H-2Kb Ab AF6-88.5 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and analyzed for H-2Kb expression by flow cytometry using a FACScan flow cytometer and the CellQuest program (Becton Dickinson, Sunnyvale, CA) (48, 49). Relative fluorescence was calculated according to the following formula: relative fluorescence = mean fluorescence for RMA-S with specific peptide - mean fluorescence for RMA-S without peptide.

CTL assay

CTL activity was measured in a standard 51Cr release assay. Briefly, peptide-coated target cells were prepared by incubating cells with 30 µM of peptide for 1 h at 37°C. Coated cells were labeled with 100 µl 1 mCi/ml 51Cr for 1 h at 37°C. Titrated numbers of restimulated effector cells were incubated with 3 x 103 51Cr-labeled target cells for 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. After incubation, released radioactivity was measured, and specific lysis was calculated according to the formula: % specific release = ((experimental release - spontaneous release)/(maximum release - spontaneous release)) x 100.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Differential immunogenicity of five H-2Kb-restricted synthetic peptide epitopes

To examine the CTL response to multiple MHC class I restricted epitopes, five well-characterized peptide epitopes were chosen, each known to be H-2Kb restricted and immunodominant in the CD8+ T cell responses to their complex Ags (Table IGo). The VSV NP52, SV NP324, and MCF env574 are dominant in the CTL-mediated clearance of the corresponding viral infections, while OVA257 and mRas59 are in the focus of the CTL response to OVA and mutant Ras-protein, respectively. To compare the magnitude of the CTL response to each of these five epitopes as single peptides, groups of B6 mice were immunized with the peptides in IFA. Immunogenicity was assessed as number of responding mice (Table IGo) and mean level of CTL activity in responding mice (Fig. 1Go). Three of these five epitopes, SV NP324, VSV NP52, and the OVA257, reproducibly elicited strong CTL responses. The MCF env574 epitope induced an intermediate response, while in our hands, the mRas59 was only weakly immunogenic. The overall pattern was similar when mice were immunized with peptide-loaded live DC or irradiated splenocytes, although the DC route generally generated weaker CTL activity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Immunogenicity of H-2Kb-binding synthetic peptides

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Magnitude of CTL responses to five H-2Kb-restricted epitopes. B6 mice were immunized with one of the following peptides: SV NP324, OVA257, VSV NP52, MCF env574, and mRas59. Peptides were either mixed with IFA and injected s.c. at the base of the tail (circle; mean and SE from five experiments), loaded on irradiated splenocytes and injected i.v. (square; three experiments), or loaded on live DC and injected s.c. (triangle; three experiments). Filled symbols represent lysis of RMA-S target cells coated with specific peptide, while open symbols represent RMA-S without peptide.

 
From the experiments shown in table IGo and Figure 1Go with mice immunized with single epitopes dissolved in IFA, or loaded on irradiated splenocytes or live DC, a hierarchical pattern of CTL reactivity is evident, with SV NP324, VSV NP52, and OVA257 being the most immunogenic, followed by MCF env574 and mRas59 in descending order.

Superdominance in the complex CTL response to five "immunodominant" synthetic peptide epitopes

With knowledge of the strength of the five CTL epitopes at hand, we wanted to investigate the simultaneous response to mixtures of these epitopes. When all five peptides were coinjected dissolved in adjuvant, the CTL response focused on the SV NP324 and VSV NP52 determinants; both of these epitopes elicited vigorous CTL responses (Fig. 2Go). The immunodominance of these two epitopes in the complex CTL response against the set of dominant epitopes was termed "superdominance." The mRas59-specific response was weak but in the same range as against the single mRas59 epitope (Fig. 2Go and Fig. 1Go, respectively). Surprisingly, the OVA257 and MCF env574 epitopes now generated only very weak CTL responses, and we therefore termed these epitopes subdominant in the CTL response to the complex mixture.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Immunodominance in the CTL response to a mixture of five H-2Kb-restricted peptide epitopes and its reversal by professional Ag presentation. B6 mice were immunized with a mixture of five peptides dissolved in IFA, loaded on 2000 rad-irradiated splenocytes, or loaded on live DC. CTL responses to the five peptides were measured in a 4-h 51Cr release cytotoxicity assay against RMA-S cells pulsed with peptide. Figure shows mean and SE from five (adjuvant), three (splenocytes), or four (dendritic cells) independent experiments.

 
Ag presentation by peptide-pulsed irradiated splenocytes inoculated i.v. generated a similar hierarchy in the CTL response (Fig. 2Go), i.e., the VSV NP52 and SV NP324 epitopes were dominant and OVA257 and MCF env574 were subdominant, while the mRas59 epitope was virtually nonimmunogenic.

Peptide administration on DC reverts superdominance

Since bone marrow-derived DC have proved powerful in the delivery of MHC class I-restricted peptides for induction of immunity against tumors, for example (12, 13), we tested this mode of Ag delivery in relation to the superdominance among multiple dominant epitopes. B6 mice injected s.c. with DC pulsed with the five peptides responded vigorously to the SV NP324, VSV NP52, OVA257, and MCF env574 epitopes, while mRas59 elicited only a very weak CTL response (Fig. 2Go). Thus, the subdominance of OVA257 and MCF env574 observed when the peptide mixture was injected in IFA or loaded on irradiated splenocytes was broken when peptides were presented in vivo, loaded on live DC.

The presence of several epitopes potentiate the CTL response against each Ag when loaded on DC

As shown above, the CTL response against the complex mixture of peptides dissolved in IFA focused on two epitopes, SV NP324 and VSV NP52. In most experiments, however, these dominant epitopes also elicited lower CTL activity in the mixture than when they were injected as single epitopes (Fig. 3Go, upper panel). In contrast, CTL responses against all peptides were boosted when the mixture was injected loaded on DC compared with single peptides loaded on DC (Fig. 3Go, lower panel). Thus, the DC route of Ag challenge not only reverted the subdominance of the OVA257 and MCF env574 epitopes, but also enhanced CTL responses against all components in the complex mixture.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Comparison of CTL responses against single and mixed peptides. The presence of several epitopes enhances the CTL responses when peptides are administered loaded on DC (lower panel), while dominance occurs when the IFA route of immunization is used (upper panel). Open bars represent CTL responses against the single epitopes, while filled bars represent responses against the mixture of SV NP324, OVA257, VSV NP52, MCF env574, and mRas59. The CTL activity against mRas59 in IFA by CTL elicited against the mixture may represent a cross-recognition by SV NP324-specific CTL, which has been observed in some experiments.

 
Differences in peptide affinity to H-2Kb do not correlate with dominance patterns but may explain the low immunogenicity of mRas 59

Since MHC class I binding affinity has proved to strongly influence peptide immunogenicity and determinant selection (21, 50, 51), we investigated whether the patterns of immunodominance observed in the peptide mixture correlated with differences in peptide affinity for class I. The stability of complexes between H-2Kb and each of the five peptides was tested by stabilizing "empty" cell surface Kb molecules on the TAP2-deficient cell line, RMA-S. Peptides were added to cultures of RMA-S maintained at 26°C overnight, followed by a 45-min chase at 37°C. The SV NP324, OVA257, VSV NP52, and MCF env574 epitopes all formed stable complexes with H-2Kb at high peptide concentrations (Fig. 4Go). At lower concentrations, the subdominant OVA257 was in fact more efficient at stabilizing Kb, indicating a higher affinity. On the other hand, mRas59 stabilized Kb poorly, indicating a lower class I affinity. Taken together, these data indicate that the superdominance of SV NP324 and VSV NP52 and subdominance of OVA257 and MCF env574 in the complex mixture is probably not directly related to MHC binding affinity, while the low immunogenicity of mRas59 may depend on weak MHC class I binding.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Relative peptide affinity determined by H-2Kb cell surface stabilization. Flow cytometric analysis of peptide-induced stabilization of cell-surface H-2Kb on RMA-S. Data are expressed as relative fluorescence. One representative of four independent experiments is shown.

 
The frequency of specific T cells differs between dominant and subdominant peptide epitopes

The results described above suggested that dominance in the CTL response against the peptide mixture was not determined at the level of processing or binding to the restriction element, but rather at the T cell level. To address this possibility, we performed limiting dilution analysis with splenocytes from mice primed in vivo with the single peptides (Fig. 5Go). On days 9 through 12 after priming, the in vivo frequency of specific CTL differed markedly between the epitopes. The dominant epitopes SV NP324 and VSV NP52 both elicited CTL at a frequency ~1/25,000 splenocytes, while the OVA257 and MCF env574 frequencies were ~3.5-fold lower. Thus, the superdominance of the SV NP324 and VSV NP52 epitopes in the peptide mixture correlated with higher numbers of CTL at days 9 through 12 in the single peptide-immunized mice.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Frequency of specific T cells in mice primed with synthetic peptide epitopes. CTL frequency obtained by limiting dilution analysis of splenocytes from mice primed with SV NP324 (filled circle), OVA257 (hollow square), VSV NP52 (filled square), or MCF env574 (filled triangle). An 8-h CTL assay was performed to each well after 6 days, and T cell frequency was calculated as described in Materials and Methods. The figure represents the mean T cell frequency in the spleen expressed as specific CTL per splenocytes with SE from three (VSV NP52 and MCF env574) or five (SV NP324 and OVA257) independent experiments.

 
Dominant and subdominant CTL populations display generally similar avidity for their epitopes

T cell clones of different specificities may display different avidities for their specific ligands as an imprint of the selection process, which is likely to affect the specificities selected as dominant during a peripheral immune response. CTL generated against the single peptides were therefore tested against target cells loaded with titrated amounts of the specific peptides. CTL specific for the SV NP324, VSV NP52, OVA257, and MCF env574 required similar doses of peptide (~0.05 nM) for half-maximal lysis (Fig. 6Go, upper panel). Furthermore, these four CTL responses required similar overall amounts of peptide (~1 nM) during the 5-day in vitro restimulation (Fig. 6Go, lower panel). T cells specific for SV NP324 were activated at a somewhat lower peptide concentration both at the target cell level and during in vitro culture, suggesting a slightly elevated T cell avidity. However, there was no clear-cut difference between the dominant VSV NP52 epitope and the subdominant OVA257 and MCF env574 epitopes.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Avidity in the interaction between CTL and specific target cells. CTL obtained by immunizing B6 mice with single peptides in adjuvant were tested against RMA-S target cells incubated with titrated amounts of specific peptide (upper panel) or restimulated with titrated amounts of peptide during in vitro culture and tested against RMA-S target cells loaded with specific peptide (lower panel). One representative experiment is shown. CTL were tested at an E:T ratio of 45:1.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Immunodominance in T cells responses has been observed in several antigenic systems (11, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 37, 38). In the present study, immunodominance was found to occur in the complex CTL response against five synthetic peptides, each previously described as dominant in its own antigenic system. When the peptide mixture was delivered in adjuvant or loaded on splenocytes, the CTL response focused mainly on two epitopes, SV NP324 and VSV NP52, while the OVA257 and MCF env574 epitopes were only very weakly recognized. The SV NP324 and VSV NP52 dominated among dominant epitopes; we use the term superdominance to describe this phenomenon. Most interestingly, when the five peptides were delivered on live DC, no superdominance was observed, and all four of these epitopes elicited similar CTL responses. Furthermore, when the DC route of immunization was employed, the presence of several epitopes potentiated the CTL responses against each epitope. The ability of DC to support efficient recognition of a broader range of epitopes can be valuable in the design of epitope-based vaccines.

Since the peptide epitopes were injected or loaded on APC in a preprocessed form, epitope selection at the level of intracellular Ag processing can be excluded as the cause of the observed immunodominance. Competition for binding to the MHC is a major factor influencing epitope selection and dominance patterns in CTL responses against complex Ags (21, 50, 51), although it is clear that peptide immunohierarchy in T cell responses does not always correlate with binding affinity to the restriction element (52). In the present study, the subdominance of OVA257 and MCF env574 could not be attributed to lower affinity to the MHC, since they stabilized H-2Kb equally as well as the dominant SV NP324 and VSV NP52. A previous study indicated that SV NP324, OVA257, and VSV NP52 have similar affinities for Kb, which supports this conclusion (53). The dominance patterns can probably be explained, therefore, by mechanisms operating at the T cell level. Indeed, the subdominance of both MCF env574 and OVA257 correlated with lower CTL frequency on days 9 through 12 after immunization, and that of MCF env574 also correlated with slightly lower intrinsic immunogenicity. Peptide dose titrations both at the target cell level and upon restimulation in vitro suggest generally similar dosage requirements in dominant and subdominant responses, although a slightly higher T cell avidity for Ag was seen in the dominant SV NP324-specific response.

These results, together with the observation that delivery of Ags loaded on cultured DC could break dominance, are consistent with a model for immunodominance based on T cell competition for APC capacity. In this model, APC capacity is limiting in a competition between T cell clones. As a result of this competition, epitopes that are recognized by less frequent T cells may not be detected by a sufficient number of cells to elicit a response, even if these epitopes bind MHC molecules and are presented equally as well as Ags recognized by more frequent T cells. Inoculation of Ag loaded on 1 x 105 live DC could render APC capacity nonlimiting, since at a given time point after immunization, such mice would be likely to have a larger population presenting Ag in secondary lymphoid organs, compared with the natural recruitment of APC from the skin at the site of IFA injection. The differences in CTL frequencies were observed on days 9 through 12 after immunization and may reflect the number of T cell precursors before immunization, but we cannot exclude the fact that other factors influencing clonal expansion postimmunization contribute to the observed differences in CTL frequency as well as to the immunodominance patterns.

Cellular competition among CD8+ T cells has been discussed in relation to several steps of T cell differentiation (54, 55, 56, 57). Features of Ag presentation that could sharpen the competition and thus restrict diversity of T cell responses include numbers of APC, total APC surface available, and availability of cytokines. One good candidate cytokine that could regulate competition is IL-12. In fact, IL-12, recently shown to modulate immunodominance among HIV-1 epitopes (36), is produced by DC upon Ag-specific interaction with T cells (58) through ligation of cell surface CD40 (59). The latter observation can also explain our result that the presence of several epitopes on inoculated DC tend to potentiate responses against each Ag. Another candidate is TGF-ß, since it can have both T cell-stimulatory (60) and -inhibitory (61) effects depending on the state of cell activation (62). Experiments to investigate the importance of cytokines in immunodominance are currently underway in our laboratory. We have recently observed immunodominance in a system based on minor histocompatibility Ags, in which events occurring postdeterminant selection appear to play a major role (our manuscript in preparation).

Our results show that immunodominance is not an absolute feature. Novel hierarchies emerge in the response against multiple dominant epitopes that do not necessarily reflect determinant selection within the APC. CTL responses against complex Ags harboring multiple epitopes that are equally well presented by the same MHC class I molecule may be balanced by differences in T cell availability and limitations in APC capacity.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. H. G. Ljunggren, Dr. R. Glas, and R. Wallin for helpful discussions.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from Arbetsmarknadens Försäkringsaktiebolag, the Swedish Cancer Society, and the Karolinska Institute. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Johan Sandberg, Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, Box 280, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; MCF, mink cell focus-inducing murine leukemia virus; mRas, mutant ras protein; SV, Sendai virus; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus. Back

Received for publication June 18, 1997. Accepted for publication December 4, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Townsend, A., J. Rothbard, F. M. Gotch, G. Bahadur, D. Wraith, A. J. McMichael. 1986. The epitope of influenza nucleoprotein recognized by cytotoxic T cells can be defined by short synthetic peptides. Cell 44:959.[Medline]
  2. Bjorkman, P. J., M. A. Saper, B. Samraoui, W. S. Bennett, J. L. Strominger, D. C. Wiley. 1987. Structure of the human class I histocompatibility antigen, HLA-A2. Nature 329:506.[Medline]
  3. Rammensee, H. G., K. Falk, O. Rötzschke. 1993. Peptides naturally presented by MHC class I molecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11:213.[Medline]
  4. Garboczi, D. N., P. Ghosh, U. Utz, Q. R. Fan, W. E. Biddison, D. C. Wiley. 1996. Structure of the complex between human T cell receptor, viral peptide and HLA-A2. Nature 384:134.[Medline]
  5. Garcia, K. C., M. Degano, R. L. Stanfield, A. Brunmark, M. R. Jackson, P. A. Peterson, L. Teyton, I. A. Wilson. 1996. An alpha-beta T cell receptor structure at 2.5 angstrom and its orientation in the TCR-MHC complex. Science 274:209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. York, I. A., K. L. Rock. 1996. Antigen processing and presentation by the class I major histocompatibility complex. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:369.[Medline]
  7. Rammensee, H. G., T. Friede, S. Stevanovic. 1995. MHC ligands and peptide motifs: first listing. Immunogenetics 41:178.[Medline]
  8. Chesnut, R. W., A. Sette, E. Celis, P. Wentworth, R. T. Kubo, J. Alexander, G. Ishioka, A. Vitiello, H. M. Grey. 1995. Design and testing of peptide-based cytotoxic T cell mediated immunotherapeutics to treat infectious diseases and cancer. Pharm. Biotechnol. 6:847.[Medline]
  9. Klavinskis, L. S., J. L. Whitton, E. Joly, M. B. A. Oldstone. 1990. Vaccination and protection from a lethal viral infection: identification, incorporation, and use of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte glycoprotein epitope. Virology 178:393.[Medline]
  10. Schulz, M., R. M. Zinkernagel, H. Hengartner. 1991. Peptide induced antiviral protection by cytotoxic T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kast, W. M., L. Roux, J. Curren, H. J. J. Blom, A. C. Voordouw, R. H. Meloen, D. Kolakofsky, C. J. M. Melief. 1991. Protection against lethal Sendai virus infection by in vivo priming of virus specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes with a free synthetic peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:2283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Mayordomo, J. I., T. Zorina, W. J. Storkus, L. Zitvogel, C. Celluzzi, L. D. Falo, C. J. Melief, S. T. Ilstad, W. M. Kast, A. B. Deleo, M. T. Lotze. 1995. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells pulsed with synthetic tumour peptides elicit protective and therapeutic antitumour immunity. Nat. Med. 1:1297.[Medline]
  13. Porgador, A., D. Snyder, E. Gilboa. 1996. Induction of antitumor immunity using bone marrow generated dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 156:2918.[Abstract]
  14. Feltkamp, M. C. W., H. L. Smits, M. P. M. Vierboom, R. P. Minnaar, B. M. De Jongh, J. W. Drijfhout, J. Ter Schegget, C. J. M. Melief, W. M. Kast. 1993. Vaccination with cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope-containing peptide protects against a tumor induced by human papillomavirus type 16-transformed cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:2242.[Medline]
  15. Mandelboim, O., E. Vadai, M. Fridkin, A. Katz-Hillel, M. Feldman, G. Berke, L. Eisenbach. 1995. Regression of established murine carcinoma metastases following vaccination with tumour-associated antigen peptides. Nat. Med. 1:1179.[Medline]
  16. Marchand, M., P. Weynants, E. Rankin, F. Arienti, F. Belli, G. Parmiani, N. Cascinelli, A. Bourlond, R. Vanwijck, Y. Humblet, J. L. Canon, C. Laurent, J. M. Naeyaert, R. Plagne, R. Deraemaeker, A. Knuth, E. Jäger, F. Brasseur, J. Herman, P. G. Coulie, T. Boon. 1995. Tumor regression responses in melanoma patients treated with a peptide encoded by gene MAGE-3. Int. J. Cancer 63:883.[Medline]
  17. Sercarz, E. E., P. L. Lehman, A. Ametani, G. Benichou, A. Miller, K. Moudgil. 1993. Dominance and crypticity of T cell antigenic determinants. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11:729.[Medline]
  18. Vijh, S., E. G. Pamer. 1997. Immunodominant and subdominant CTL responses to Listeria monocytogenes infection. J. Immunol. 158:3366.[Abstract]
  19. Wolpert, E., L. Franksson, K. Kärre. 1995. Dominant and cryptic antigens in the MHC class I restricted T cell response across a complex minor histocompatibility barrier: analysis and mapping by elution of cellular peptides. Int. Immunol. 7:919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Mylin, L. M., R. H. Bonneau, J. D. Lippolis, S. S. Tevethia. 1995. Hierarchy among multiple H-2b-restricted cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes within simian virus 40 T antigen. J. Virol. 69:6665.[Abstract]
  21. Chen, W., S. Khilko, J. Fecondo, D. H. Margulies, J. McCluskey. 1994. Determinant selection of major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted antigenic peptides is explained by class I-peptide affinity and is strongly influenced by nondominant anchor residues. J. Exp. Med. 180:1471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. van der Most, R. G., A. Sette, C. Oseroff, J. Alexander, K. Murali-Krishna, L. L. Lau, S. Southwood, J. Sidney, R. W. Chesnut, M. Matloubian, R. Ahmed. 1996. Analysis of cytotoxic T cell responses to dominant and subdominant epitopes during acute and chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. J. Immunol. 157:5543.[Abstract]
  23. Vitiello, A., L. Yuan, R. W. Chesnut, J. Sidney, S. Southwood, P. Farness, M. R. Jackson, P. A. Peterson, A. Sette. 1996. Immunodominance analysis of CTL responses to influenza PR8 virus reveals two new dominant and subdominant Kb-restricted epitopes. J. Immunol. 157:5555.[Abstract]
  24. Niedermann, G., S. Butz, H. G. Ihlenfeld, R. Grimm, M. Lucchiari, H. Hoschutzky, G. Jung, B. Maier, K. Eichmann. 1995. Contribution of proteasome-mediated proteolysis to the hierarchy of epitopes presented by major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. Immunity 2:289.[Medline]
  25. Eggers, M., B. Boes-Fabian, T. Ruppert, P. M. Kloetzel, U. H. Koszinowski. 1995. The cleavage preference of the proteasome governs the yield of antigenic peptides. J. Exp. Med. 182:1865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ossendorp, F., M. Eggers, A. Neisig, T. Ruppert, M. Groettrup, A. Sijts, E. Mengedé, P. M. Kloetzel, J. Neefjes, U. Koszinowski, C. J. M. Melief. 1996. A single residue exchange within a viral CTL epitope alters proteasome-mediated degradation resulting in lack of antigen presentation. Immunity 5:115.[Medline]
  27. Levitskaya, J., M. Coram, V. Levitsky, S. Imreh, P. M. Steigerwald-Mullen, G. Klein, M. G. Kurilla, M. G. Masucci. 1995. Inhibition of antigen processing by the internal repeat region of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen-1. Nature 375:685.[Medline]
  28. Schumacher, T. N. M., D. Y. Kantesaria, M. T. Heemels, P. G. Ashton-Rickardt, J. C. Shepherd, K. Fruh, Y. Yang, P. A. Peterson, S. Tonegawa, H. L. Ploegh. 1994. Peptide length and sequence specificity of the mouse TAP1/TAP2 translocator. J. Exp. Med. 179:533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Momburg, F., J. Roelse, J. C. Howard, G. W. Butcher, G. J. Hämmerling, J. J. Neefjes. 1994. Selectivity of MHC-encoded peptide transporters from human, mouse and rat. Nature 367:648.[Medline]
  30. Heemels, M. T., H. L. Ploegh. 1994. Substrate specificity of allelic variants of the TAP peptide transporter. Immunity 1:775.[Medline]
  31. Neisig, A., J. Roelse, A. J. A. M. Sijts, F. Ossendorp, M. C. W. Feltkamp, W. M. Kast, C. J. M. Melief, J. Neefjes. 1995. Major differences in transporter associated with antigen presentation (TAP)-dependent translocation of MHC class I-presentable peptides and the effect of flanking sequences. J. Immunol. 154:1273.[Abstract]
  32. Levitsky, V., Q. J. Zhang, J. Levitskaya, M. G. Masucci. 1996. The life span of major histocompatibility complex-peptide complexes influences the efficiency of presentation and immunogenicity of two class I-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes in the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 4. J. Exp. Med. 183:915.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Daly, K., P. Nguyen, D. L. Woodland, M. A. Blackman. 1995. Immunodominance of major histocompatibility complex class I restricted influenza virus epitopes can be influenced by the T-cell receptor repertoire. J. Virol. 69:7416.[Abstract]
  34. Cao, W., B. A. Myers-Powell, T. J. Braciale. 1996. The weak CD8+ CTL response to an influenza hemagglutinin epitope reflects limited T cell availability. J. Immunol. 157:505.[Abstract]
  35. Connolly, J. M.. 1994. The peptide p2Ca is immunodominant in allorecognition of Ld by chain variable region V8+ but not V8- strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Eberl, G., B. Kessler, L. P. Eberl, M. J. Brunda, D. Valmori, G. Corradin. 1996. Immunodominance of cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes co-injected in vivo and modulation by interleukin 12. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:2709.[Medline]
  37. Van Bleek, G. M., S. G. Nathenson. 1990. Isolation of an endogenously processed immunodominant viral peptide from the class I H-2Kb molecule. Nature 348:213.[Medline]
  38. Schumacher, T. N. M., M. L. H. De Bruijn, L. N. Vernie, W. M. Kast, C. J. M. Melief, J. J. Neefjes, H. L. Ploegh.. 1991. Peptide selection by MHC class I molecules. Nature 350:703.[Medline]
  39. Sijts, A. J. A. M., F. Ossendorp, E. A. M. Mengedé, P. J. Van den Elsen, C. J. M. Melief. 1994. Immunodominant mink cell focus-inducing murine leukemia virus (MuLV)-encoded CTL epitope, identified by its MHC class I-binding motif, explains MuLV-type specificity of MCF-directed cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 152:106.[Abstract]
  40. Peace, D. J., J. W. Smith, W. Chen, S. G. You, W. L. Cosand, J. Blake, M. A. Cheever. 1994. Lysis of Ras oncogene transformed cells by specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes elicited by primary in vitro immunization with mutated Ras peptide. J. Exp. Med. 179:473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Rötzschke, O., K. Falk, S. Stevanovic, G. Jung, P. Walden, H. G. Rammensee. 1991. Exact prediction of a natural T cell epitope. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:2891.[Medline]
  42. Ljunggren, H. G., K. Kärre. 1985. Host resistance directed selectively against H-2 deficient lymphoma variants: analysis of the mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 162:1745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Inaba, K., M. Inaba, N. Romani, H. Aya, M. Deguchi, S. Ikehara, S. Muramatsu, R. M. Steinman. 1992. Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor. J. Exp. Med. 176:1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Zhou, X., L. Berg, U. M. Abdel Motal, M. Jondal. 1992. In vivo primary induction of virus specific CTL by immunization with 9-mer synthetic peptides. J. Immunol. Methods 153:193.[Medline]
  45. Sandberg, J. K., B. J. Chambers, L. Van Kaer, K. Kärre, H. G. Ljunggren. 1996. TAP1-deficient mice select a CD8+ T cell repertoire that displays both diversity and peptide specificity. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:288.[Medline]
  46. Takahashi, H., Y. Nakagawa, K. Yokomuro, J. A. Berzofsky. 1993. Induction of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes by immunization with syngeneic irradiated HIV-1 envelope derived peptide-pulsed dendritic cells. Int. Immunol. 5:849.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Lefkovits, I., H. Waldmann. 1979. Limiting Dilution Analysis of Cells in the Immune System Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
  48. Ljunggren, H. G., N. J. Stam, J. J. C. Öhlén, P. Neefjes, M. T. Höglund, J. Heemels, T. N. M. Bastin, A. Schumacher, K. Kärre Townsend, H. L. Ploegh. 1990. Empty MHC class I molecules come out in the cold. Nature 346:476.[Medline]
  49. Stuber, G., S. Modrow, P. Höglund, L. Franksson, J. Elvin, H. Wolf, K. Kärre, G. Klein. 1992. Assessment of major histocompatibility complex class I interaction with Epstein-Barr virus and human immunodeficiency virus peptides by elevation of membrane H-2 and HLA in peptide loading-deficient cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:2697.[Medline]
  50. Sette, A., A. Vitiello, B. Reherman, P. Fowler, R. Nayersina, W. M. Kast, C. J. M. Melief, C. Oseroff, L. Yuan, J. Ruppert, J. Sidney, M. F. del Guerico, S. Southwood, R. T. Kubo, R. W. Chesnut, H. M. Grey, F. V. Chisari. 1994. The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes. J. Immunol. 153:5586.[Abstract]
  51. van der Burg, S. H., M. J. W. Visseren, R. M. P. Brandt, W. M. Kast, C. J. M. Melief. 1996. Immunogenicity of peptides bound to MHC class I molecules depends on the MHC-peptide complex stability. J. Immunol. 156:3308.[Abstract]
  52. Deng, Y., J. W. Yewdell, L. C. Eisenlohr, J. R. Bennink. 1997. MHC affinity, peptide liberation, T cell repertoire, and immunodominance all contribute to the paucity of MHC class I-restricted peptides recognized by antiviral CTL. J. Immunol. 158:1507.[Abstract]
  53. Matsumura, M., Y. Saito, M. R. Jackson, E. S. Song, P. A. Peterson. 1992. In vitro peptide binding to soluble empty class I major histocompatibility complex molecules isolated from transfected Drosophila melanogaster cells. J. Biol. Chem. 267:23589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Freitas, A. A., F. Agenes, G. C. Coutinho. 1996. Cellular competition modulates survival and selection of CD8+ T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:2640.[Medline]
  55. Brunner, M. C., N. A. Mitchison, S. C. Schneider. 1994. Immunoregulation mediated by T-cell clusters. Folia Biol. 40:359.
  56. Pion, S., P. Fontaine, M. Desaulniers, J. Jutras, J. G. Filep, C. Perreault. 1997. On the mechanism of immunodominance in cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to minor histocompatibility antigens. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:421.[Medline]
  57. De Boer, R. J., A. S. Perelson. 1994. T cell repertoires and competitive exclusion. J. Theor. Biol. 169:375.[Medline]
  58. Heufler, C., F. Koch, U. Stanzl, G. Topar, M. Wysocka, G. Trinchieri, A. Enk, R. M. Steinman, N. Romani, G. Schuler. 1996. Interleukin-12 is produced by dendritic cells and mediates T helper 1 development as well as interferon-{gamma} production by T helper 1 cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:659.[Medline]
  59. Cella, M., D. Scheidegger, K. Palmer-Lehmann, P. Lane, A. Lanzavecchia, G. Alber. 1996. Ligation of CD40 on dendritic cells triggers production of high levels of interleukin-12 and enhances T cell stimulatory capacity: T-T help via APC activation. J. Exp. Med. 184:747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Lee, H., S. Rich. 1991. Co-stimulation of T cells proliferation by transforming growth factor-ß1. J. Immunol. 147:1127.[Abstract]
  61. Tada, T., S. Ohzeki, K. Utsumi, H. Takiuchi, M. Muramatsu, X. Li, J. Shimizu, H. Fujiwara, T. Hamaoka. 1991. Transforming growth factor-ß-induced inhibition of T cell function. J. Immunol. 146:1077.[Abstract]
  62. Moses, H. L., E. Y. Yang, J. A. Pietenpol. 1990. TGF-ß stimulation and inhibition of cell proliferation: new mechanistic insights. Cell 63:245.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
H. R. Fryer, A. Scherer, A. Oxenius, R. Phillips, and A. R. McLean
No evidence for competition between cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses in HIV-1 infection
Proc R Soc B, December 22, 2009; 276(1677): 4389 - 4397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
H. Huang, Y.-J. Wang, A. P. White, J.-Z. Meng, G.-R. Liu, S.-L. Liu, and Y.-D. Wang
Salmonella expressing a T-cell epitope from Sendai virus are able to induce anti-infection immunity
J. Med. Microbiol., September 1, 2009; 58(9): 1236 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Riedl, A. Wieland, K. Lamberth, S. Buus, F. Lemonnier, K. Reifenberg, J. Reimann, and R. Schirmbeck
Elimination of Immunodominant Epitopes from Multispecific DNA-Based Vaccines Allows Induction of CD8 T Cells That Have a Striking Antiviral Potential
J. Immunol., July 1, 2009; 183(1): 370 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. L. Turnbull, M. Wong, S. Wang, X. Wei, N. A. Jones, K. E. Conrod, D. Aldam, J. Turner, P. Pellegrino, B. F. Keele, et al.
Kinetics of Expansion of Epitope-Specific T Cell Responses during Primary HIV-1 Infection
J. Immunol., June 1, 2009; 182(11): 7131 - 7145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
A. H. Dzutsev, I. M. Belyakov, D. V. Isakov, D. H. Margulies, and J. A. Berzofsky
Avidity of CD8 T cells sharpens immunodominance
Int. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 19(4): 497 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. A. York, M. A. Brehm, S. Zendzian, C. F. Towne, and K. L. Rock
Endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1 (ERAP1) trims MHC class I-presented peptides in vivo and plays an important role in immunodominance
PNAS, June 13, 2006; 103(24): 9202 - 9207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. E. Foulds and H. Shen
Clonal Competition Inhibits the Proliferation and Differentiation of Adoptively Transferred TCR Transgenic CD4 T Cells in Response to Infection.
J. Immunol., March 1, 2006; 176(5): 3037 - 3043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. H. Newberg, K. J. McEvers, D. A. Gorgone, M. A. Lifton, S. H. C. Baumeister, R. S. Veazey, J. E. Schmitz, and N. L. Letvin
Immunodomination in the Evolution of Dominant Epitope-Specific CD8+ T Lymphocyte Responses in Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Rhesus Monkeys
J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 319 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Hayakawa, V. Screpanti, H. Yagita, A. Grandien, H.-G. Ljunggren, M. J. Smyth, and B. J. Chambers
NK Cell TRAIL Eliminates Immature Dendritic Cells In Vivo and Limits Dendritic Cell Vaccination Efficacy
J. Immunol., January 1, 2004; 172(1): 123 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. S. Liu, Y. Xu, L. Hardy, V. Khammanivong, W. Zhao, G. J. P. Fernando, G. R. Leggatt, and I. H. Frazer
IL-10 Mediates Suppression of the CD8 T Cell IFN-{gamma} Response to a Novel Viral Epitope in a Primed Host
J. Immunol., November 1, 2003; 171(9): 4765 - 4772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Malkevitch, L. J. Patterson, K. Aldrich, E. Richardson, W. G. Alvord, and M. Robert-Guroff
A Replication Competent Adenovirus 5 Host Range Mutant-Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) Recombinant Priming/Subunit Protein Boosting Vaccine Regimen Induces Broad, Persistent SIV-Specific Cellular Immunity to Dominant and Subdominant Epitopes in Mamu-A*01 Rhesus Macaques
J. Immunol., April 15, 2003; 170(8): 4281 - 4289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Stober, I. Jomantaite, R. Schirmbeck, and J. Reimann
NKT Cells Provide Help for Dendritic Cell-Dependent Priming of MHC Class I-Restricted CD8+ T Cells In Vivo
J. Immunol., March 1, 2003; 170(5): 2540 - 2548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
W. Chen, J. R. Bennink, P. A. Morton, and J. W. Yewdell
Mice Deficient in Perforin, CD4+ T Cells, or CD28-Mediated Signaling Maintain the Typical Immunodominance Hierarchies of CD8+ T-Cell Responses to Influenza Virus
J. Virol., September 11, 2002; 76(20): 10332 - 10337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Schirmbeck, D. Stober, S. El Kholy, P. Riedl, and J. Reimann
The Immunodominant, Ld-Restricted T Cell Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Efficiently Suppresses T Cell Priming to Multiple Dd-, Kd-, and Kb-Restricted HBsAg Epitopes
J. Immunol., June 15, 2002; 168(12): 6253 - 6262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. J. Palmowski, E. M.-L. Choi, I. F. Hermans, S. C. Gilbert, J.-L. Chen, U. Gileadi, M. Salio, A. Van Pel, S. Man, E. Bonin, et al.
Competition Between CTL Narrows the Immune Response Induced by Prime-Boost Vaccination Protocols
J. Immunol., May 1, 2002; 168(9): 4391 - 4398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Rice, T. Elliott, S. Buchan, and F. K. Stevenson
DNA Fusion Vaccine Designed to Induce Cytotoxic T Cell Responses Against Defined Peptide Motifs: Implications for Cancer Vaccines
J. Immunol., August 1, 2001; 167(3): 1558 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Loirat, F. A. Lemonnier, and M.-L. Michel
Multiepitopic HLA-A*0201-Restricted Immune Response Against Hepatitis B Surface Antigen After DNA-Based Immunization
J. Immunol., October 15, 2000; 165(8): 4748 - 4755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Rawson, I. F. Hermans, S. P. Huck, J. M. Roberts, H. Pircher, and F. Ronchese
Immunotherapy with Dendritic Cells and Tumor Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I-derived Peptides Requires a High Density of Antigen on Tumor Cells
Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 60(16): 4493 - 4498.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. K. Sandberg, L. Franksson, J. Sundback, J. Michaelsson, M. Petersson, A. Achour, R. P. A. Wallin, N. E. Sherman, T. Bergman, H. Jornvall, et al.
T Cell Tolerance Based on Avidity Thresholds Rather Than Complete Deletion Allows Maintenance of Maximal Repertoire Diversity
J. Immunol., July 1, 2000; 165(1): 25 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Q.-J. Zhang, S. S. Chen, C.-A. Saari, M. G. Massuci, F. Tufaro, and W. A. Jefferies
Evidence of Selective Processing of Immunodominant Epitopes in Virally Infected Cells
J. Immunol., May 1, 2000; 164(9): 4513 - 4521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Yang, D. Kittlesen, C. L. Slingluff Jr., C. E. Vervaert, H. F. Seigler, and T. L. Darrow
Dendritic Cells Infected with a Vaccinia Vector Carrying the Human gp100 Gene Simultaneously Present Multiple Specificities and Elicit High-Affinity T Cells Reactive to Multiple Epitopes and Restricted by HLA-A2 and -A3
J. Immunol., April 15, 2000; 164(8): 4204 - 4211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. C. Wilson, W. C. Olson, T. Tuting, C. R. Rinaldo, M. T. Lotze, and W. J. Storkus
HIV-1-Specific CTL Responses Primed In Vitro by Blood-Derived Dendritic Cells and Th1-Biasing Cytokines
J. Immunol., March 1, 1999; 162(5): 3070 - 3078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Z. Wolpert, P. Grufman, J. K. Sandberg, A. Tegnesjo, and K. Karre
Immunodominance in the CTL Response Against Minor Histocompatibility Antigens: Interference Between Responding T Cells, Rather than with Presentation of Epitopes
J. Immunol., November 1, 1998; 161(9): 4499 - 4505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandberg, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kärre, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandberg, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kärre, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS