|
|
||||||||

*
Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ 07065; and
Columbia University, New York, NY 10032
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Following induction by cytokines (IFN-
, IL-2, TNF-
) or LPS,
various cell types express iNOS. Under these conditions, large amounts
of NO are produced over an extended period of time. High levels of NO
can be directly cytotoxic. In combating various infectious agents or
tumors, this can be physiologically beneficial (1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). However,
excessive amounts of NO and its metabolic products also have been
implicated in pathologic outcomes of infectious and autoimmune diseases
(3, 4, 11). It has been suggested that iNOS is involved in a number of
important autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS),
diabetes mellitus, graft-vs-host disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and
systemic lupus erythematosus (1, 4, 6, 8, 12, 13, 14). NADPH-diaphorase
staining reaction in tissues from affected patients or animals with
experimental disease suggests localized NOS (constitutive NOS (cNOS)
and/or iNOS) activity (1, 6, 12, 15, 16, 17). Investigations also have
shown elevated levels of NO within cellular preparations or body fluids
of animals or patients with certain autoimmune diseases, as measured by
the Griess reaction (18), nitrite fluorometric assays (19, 20),
chemiluminescence (21), or electron paramagnetic resonance (2, 13).
Elevated iNOS mRNA levels have been demonstrated using
Northern blot analysis and/or reverse transcriptase-driven in situ PCR
(3, 22, 23, 24).
The expression of iNOS and elevated levels of nitrite in affected tissues suggests that iNOS is directly involved in the pathogenesis of certain autoimmune diseases. However, its presence may be merely a result of inflammation. The administration of NOS inhibitors such as aminoguanidine (AG) and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31) to animal models of human autoimmune disease has yielded conflicting results with regard to disease severity and progression. These inhibitors, however, are not iNOS specific (11, 16, 28, 32, 33), and are not well characterized regarding bioavailability at the target tissue. To address these limitations, NOS2 knockout (KO) (34, 35) mice were used to determine the role of iNOS in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model that mimics human MS (36, 37, 38, 39, 40).
The hallmark lesions in MS are typified by mononuclear cell infiltration, demyelination, and subsequent glial scar formation (41). These pathologic changes can be mimicked in EAE-induced disease in mice either by active immunization with whole spinal cord homogenate, purified myelin basic protein (MBP), synthetic encephalitogenic peptides, myelin proteolipid protein (PLP), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (33, 37, 38, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52), or by the adoptive transfer of T cells specific for these Ags (35, 39, 51, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58). EAE is mediated by myelin-specific CD4+ MHC class II-restricted Th1 cells (37, 40, 41, 49). The experimental disease, EAE, is characterized by an ascending paralysis, initially affecting the tail and hind limbs, and subsequently affecting the forelimbs and brain (41). The chronic, remitting-relapsing form of EAE, which more closely resembles MS in humans, is inducible in PL/J and SJL strains of mice.
To address the role of iNOS in the onset or pathophysiology of EAE, we backcrossed NOS2 KO mice to PL/J (H-2u) mice. iNOS-deficient and control mice were analyzed for EAE incidence, severity, and remission in the presence or absence of the general NOS inhibitor AG.
| Methods and Materials |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All mice were barrier housed, specific pathogen free, and maintained in static microisolator cages. Autoclaved food and water were provided ad libitum. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Merck Research Laboratories (Rahway, NJ) approved the animal use, and all animals were cared for in accordance with the ILAR (64).
Specific pathogen-free PL/J female mice 6 to 16 wk old were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) for controls and backcrossing. Mice heterozygous for the targeted NOS2-/+ gene (129SvEv) (34) were backcrossed with PL/J mice for two generations, after which the MHC class II haplotype was fixed at H-2u. Lymphocytes isolated from whole blood collected from N2 backcrossed offspring heterozygous for the presence of the targeted NOS2-/+ gene were used for MHCII haplotyping. N2 NOS2-/+ heterozygous, H-2u homozygous mice were intercrossed, weanlings were genotyped, and homozygous wild-type (WT) (NOS2+/+) and KO (NOS2-/-) matings were established for the generation of experimental animals. Male and female offspring were used for experiments between the ages of 6 to 12 wk of age. PL/J mice were used as positive controls for EAE induction.
Peptide synthesis and purification
The dominant antigenic peptide from rat MBP was synthesized for the purpose of immunization. Rat peptide (Ac 1-11) (Ac-Ala-Ser-Gln-Lys-Arg-Pro-Ser-Gln-Arg-His-Gly-COOH) was synthesized via the Merrifield solid-phase technique on an Applied Biosystems 430A peptide synthesizer (Foster City, CA) using standard F-moc-protected amino acids (Perkin-Elmer/ABI) and the manufacturers suggested protocols for 2-(1H-benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate-mediated couplings on NovaSyn"TGT" resins (Nova Biochem, San Diego, CA). Peptides were simultaneously deprotected and cleaved from the resin with 92.5% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), 2.5% ethanedithiol, 2.5% triisopropylsilane, and 2.5% water at room temperature for 2 h. Crude peptides were precipitated and washed with ethyl ether, dissolved in 10% acetic acid, and lyophilized. The resulting crude peptides were purified by reversed-phase HPLC on Waters (Milford, MA) C18 Deltapak columns with a 45-min gradient of 5 to 50% acetonitrile in aqueous 0.1% TFA. Purity of the peptides was assessed by reversed-phase HPLC on a Brownlee Spheri-5 ODS column (Bodman, Aston, PA) with a 45-min gradient of 5 to 50% acetonitrile in aqueous 0.1% TFA. All peptides were >95% pure. Molecular ions were obtained by ESI-MS to confirm the structure of each peptide. The mouse peptide used in an early trial of EAE model evaluation (Ac 1-20) (Ac-Ala-Ser-Gln-Lys-Arg-Pro-Ser-Gln-Arg-Ser-Lys-Tyr-Leu-Ala-Thr-Ala-Ser-Thr-Met-Asp-COOH) was donated by Dr. Dennis Zaller (Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ).
Induction of EAE
To establish the EAE model for this study, the PL/J mouse strain was tested using a murine MBP 20-mer peptide and a rat MBP 11-mer peptide. The rat peptide was determined to be the most reliable. To determine the optimal concentrations of peptide and pertussis, rat peptide (100, 200, 400, and 800 µg/mouse) was injected at the tail base vs the footpad, followed by i.v. injection of 75, 150, or 300 ng of pertussis toxin for each peptide concentration and site of immunization. This was performed on five mice each for a total of 150 mice. We found that 100 µg of peptide immunized at the tail base followed by two injections of 150 ng of pertussis toxin gave the most reliable results, and did not result in too high an incidence of overt lethality (scores = 5). In our experience with KO and animal models of various human diseases, we found that it is often advantageous to be in the middle of the road with respect to disease, so increases as well as decreases can be observed. If the model is optimized for maximal disease, it is difficult to detect exacerbations if they occur.
Each animal was immunized (day 0) s.c. at the base of the tail with 100 mg of MBP rat peptide, 200 mg of heat-inactivated Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37RA; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) in 0.1 ml of an emulsification of equal volumes of sterile Dulbeccos phosphate buffered saline (DPBS; Specialty Media, Lavallette, NJ) and CFA (Difco Laboratories). Twenty-four and 72 h later, animals were injected i.v. with 150 ng of pertussis toxin (Islet-Activating Protein; List Biologic Laboratories, Inc., Campbell, CA) in 0.1 ml of sterile DPBS per day. Negative controls followed the same injection protocol in the absence of the rat MBP peptide. Animals were clinically scored once daily using the following scoring system: grade 0 = no clinical signs; grade 1 = tail paralysis; grade 2 = ataxia; grade 3 = one to two limbs plegic; grade 4 = three to four limbs plegic; grade 5 = moribund or dead. Animals were euthanized if found to be grade 4 or worse. Water-soaked food was provided on the cage bottom when animals presented as grade 3. Fatalities in mice that died or were euthanized before day 10 were attributed to pertussis toxicity, not to classical EAE. Animals were not scored clinically before day 10 so that animals acutely responding to CFA-peptide were not included in the statistical analysis of this study.
AG treatment of mice
Unless otherwise noted, mice received no daily injections following EAE induction. In the study using AG, mice (KO, WT, and PL/J) were treated from day 0 with AG hemisulfate (A-7009; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) dissolved in sterile DPBS at a dose of 5 mg/mouse (400 mg/kg/day) twice a day in 0.1 ml, i.p. Control mice (KO, WT, and PL/J) received 0.1 ml of sterile DPBS, twice a day, i.p., from day 0 and another group of mice (WT, KO) received no daily injections.
Determination of NOS2 inhibition in AG-treated mice
LPS (20 mg/mouse in 0.1 ml) (01.11.B4 Escherichia coli; Difco) was injected i.p. into WT and KO mice that had previously received twice a day i.p. injections of AG or DPBS for 48 h before LPS challenge. LPS controls received an i.p. injection of DPBS (0.1 ml). Animals were euthanized 6 h postinjection, and plasma was collected for fluorometric nitrate/nitrite (Nox) analysis as described (34).
Histopathology and scoring of histologic sections
At the end of study, animals intended for histopathologic analysis were anesthetized with 130 mg of Avertin (2,2,2-tribromoethanol; Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI), and perfused through their left ventricles with physiologic saline followed by freshly prepared 4.0% paraformaldehyde (Sigma Chemical Co.). Brains and spinal cords were removed. The brain tissue was immediately preserved in 10% buffered formalin. Each spinal cord was removed with the vertebral canal encasing it, placed in Bouins fixative for 5 days, and then transferred into 10% buffered formalin until processing. Seven-micron-thick tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) or Luxol Fast Blue (Research Pathology Services, New Britain, PA).
Histologic sections were scored with respect to inflammatory cellular infiltrate and neuronal degeneration. H & E-stained slides were assessed for inflammation using the following scoring system: (0) = no evidence of inflammation; (1) rare, scattered small foci of cellular inflammation; (2) multiple, isolated foci of cellular infiltration; (3) multiple, confluent foci of inflammation; and (4) foci of necrosis and/or neutrophilic infiltration. Luxol Fast Blue-stained slides were assessed for neuronal degeneration or axonal swelling using the following scoring system: (0) normal; (1) minimal or few, scattered degenerative neurons; (2) moderate, multifocal groups of degenerative neurons; (3) marked or large, multifocal degenerative neurons; and (4) severe or coalescing groups of degenerative neurons.
Statistical analysis
Ten- to 24-day postinoculation data from 149 mice (36 PL/J, 50 WT, and 63 KO) were included in the analysis. Their severity scores were analyzed by performing a two-way (GENOTYPE and DAY) analysis of variance with repeated measures on the rank-transformed scores followed by the Least Significant Difference test for the difference between genotypes within a given day. The difference between genotypes in the incidence and recovery rate within a given day were assessed by Fishers exact test. The statistical significance level was set at 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PL/J, and N2 WT and KO mice were induced for EAE as described in
Materials and Methods. An animal was
determined to be diseased if their daily clinical score was greater
than zero. The incidence of disease per genotype was calculated as
percent of mice affected on a given day 10 to 24 days postinoculation
with CFA/peptide. N2 WT PL/J backcrossed mice were determined to be
susceptible to induction of EAE at levels similar to the parental
congenic PL/J mice (Fig. 1
A). Day 13 was the
onset of statistical difference between N2 KO and N2 WT genotypes, with
the N2 KO mice having a twofold higher incidence of disease than the N2
WT or PL/J groups. By day 18, the N2 KO mice had a fourfold greater
incidence of disease than the N2 WT or PL/J mice. On the last day of
the study (day 24), the disease incidence in N2 KO mice was more than
sixfold greater than the N2 WT mice (75 vs 12%, p <
0.0001). By the end of the study, 50% (18 of 36) and 66% (33 of 50)
of the PL/J and N2 WT mice, respectively, had at some point shown
clinical signs of EAE, compared with 92% (58 of 63) of the N2 KO
mice.
|
Analysis of EAE recovery in the NOS2 KO mouse
By definition, the average severity score is heavily influenced by
the disease incidence within a given genotype. When the clinically
nonresponsive (score = 0) mice were excluded from the calculation,
the average severity scores of affected animals (scores greater than 0)
were not statistically different between genotypes (Fig. 1
C). To further address the full clinical picture of
EAE, the data were analyzed for recovery of mice from a clinically
affected state, or EAE remission. Percent remission was defined as the
fraction of animals of a given genotype that were clinically normal
(clinical score = 0) after being clinically affected, compared
with the total number of animals of a given genotype that were
clinically affected. Remission was seen for all three groups, and
increased with time for the PL/J and N2 WT mice (Fig. 2
). By definition, as scoring for
clinical disease began on day 10 in these studies, remission was
calculated starting on day 11. Remissions before day 11 were not
assessed. By day 13, the onset of statistical difference between
genotypes, the remission rate of N2 WT mice was threefold higher than
that of the N2 KO mice. At the last day of the study (day 24), 82% (27
of 33) N2 WT mice and 72% (13 of 18) PL/J mice had recovered to
clinical scores of 0, while only 19% (11 of 58) of the N2
NOS2 KO mice had recovered. Mice that recovered did not
subsequently relapse. Mice were observed through day 24 post-EAE
induction. The remission rate was similar for N2 WT and PL/J mice,
demonstrating that the N2 backcross mice had sufficient genetic
information to allow them to respond like the parental strain. The
effects of disease remission also influenced mortality rates. Only 17%
(3 of 18) PL/J and 6% (2 of 33) N2 WT mice died (score = 5),
while 38% (22 of 58) N2 KO mice died.
|
Results of previous studies demonstrated that murine EAE could be substantially reduced using the nonspecific isoform NOS inhibitor AG (30). To determine whether this amelioration was unique to AG treatment as a result of the inhibition of other NOS isoforms, due to residual iNOS activity, or to differences in the mouse model employed, we treated the PL/J, N2 WT, and N2 KO mice twice a day with AG as described in Materials and Methods. The dosing regime was the same as previously described (30). AG reduced in vivo iNOS activity about threefold as judged by plasma Nox concentrations post-LPS challenge, as described in Materials and Methods. WT mice had plasma NOx levels of 113 mM after treatment with LPS and PBS compared with levels of 41 mM after AG. Background NOx levels in the absence of LPS were 8 mM. Dosing at twofold greater levels to obtain more iNOS inhibition resulted in significant mortality. We controlled for the stress of injection on EAE induction by comparing uninjected mice and PBS-injected mice in the same study, and observed that EAE incidence was increased by injection alone, so all AG studies were performed with appropriate vehicle control groups.
AG increased the incidence of disease and the average severity scores
in the PL/J and N2 WT mice above what was observed in the PBS vehicle
group, partially mimicking the N2 KO results (Fig. 3
, A and B).
Since the N2 KO mice were at maximal EAE incidence by day 14, no
significant changes in incidence (or severity) were observed. AG did
not reduce the incidence or the severity of EAE in PL/J, N2 WT, and N2
KO mice, contradicting previous studies. These results also demonstrate
that the KO results and the previous AG studies were not simply due to
inhibition of other NOS isoforms by AG. The degree of exacerbation
observed after AG treatment of N2 WT mice was not as great as the
difference between N2 WT and N2 KO mice, implying that residual
NOS2 activity was enough to offer significant protection
from EAE. In keeping with these results, AG dosing correspondingly
decreased the number of EAE remissions observed in PL/J and N2 WT mice
(Fig. 3
C). The N2 KO PBS control group displayed no
remission at all, while the AG-treated N2 WT animals showed a slight
increase in remission that was not significant.
|
The initial histopathologic studies were performed on tissue
samples obtained at 24-day post-EAE induction. Inflammation of the
central nervous system (CNS) was characterized by perivascular cuffing
of mononuclear cells and myelin sheath swelling with axonal
degeneration. Inflammation was generally a nonsuppurative response,
consisting of lymphocytes, macrophages, and plasma cells. CNS tissue
from the more severely affected animals (
2) concurrently had abnormal
histologic scores (
1) (Tables I and
II). It was observed that N2 WT mice that remained clinically
unaffected concurrently had histologic scores of zero, while some
clinically unaffected N2 KO mice did in fact have evidence of CNS
inflammation or demyelination, potentially indicative of preclinical
disease (Table I
). However, on average both N2 WT and N2 KO mice that
exhibited clinical disease appeared to have similar pathologic scores,
regardless of whether or not they underwent remission (Table I
). As
this histopathologic analysis was performed 24 days postinduction, we
analyzed mice for histologic scores at day 14 in a separate
double-blind study to determine whether the N2 KO mice had a higher
level of early inflammatory events. Similar to what was observed on day
24, no differences were observed between the N2 WT and N2 KO mice
histologic scores (Table II
).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We were somewhat surprised when our study demonstrated more disease in the absence of iNOS, because much evidence has implicated iNOS as being detrimental in several autoimmune diseases. Indeed, the results of this study are in contrast with those reported elsewhere using NOS inhibitors. Cross et al. and Zhao et al. found that EAE in mice and rats, respectively, was ameliorated (30, 59), whereas Ruuls et al. and Zielask et al. found either no difference or enhancement of disease in the Lewis rat (28, 60). Using KO mice devoid of NOS2 activity backcrossed to a strain proven to be susceptible to EAE, we hoped to elucidate the role of iNOS and NO in EAE without the variables of nonspecific or incomplete inhibition. Genetic differences between our groups were probably not a factor, since percent incidence, average severity, remission, histologic analysis, and response to AG of the N2 WT and PL/J strains were not statistically different, indicating that fixing the H-2u haplotype and backcrossing to the N2 generation were sufficient for EAE susceptibility and progression. In addition, we used very large numbers of mice to control for possible genetic heterogeneity between animals.
We used AG treatment to address the potential for inhibition of NOS isoforms other than iNOS. As NOS2 KO mice are completely devoid of iNOS activity, in contrast to using NOS inhibitors, this also controlled for the effects of residual iNOS activity. The dose, timing of AG administration before EAE induction, and route of administration were matched to reduce variability between in vivo studies. iNOS activity was reduced about threefold after administration of AG in this and previous studies (30), with residual levels of iNOS activity being about four times the baseline level. NOx levels in the N2 NOS2 KO mice 6 h after LPS administration were the same as the baseline levels (data not shown). Instead of amelioration of EAE, we again saw exacerbation of disease. With regard to disease incidence, average severity and remission, AG treatment made the N2 WT and PL/J mice respond more like the N2 KO mice. These data imply that the amelioration of EAE using AG observed in previous studies was not likely due to the inhibition of other NOS isoforms, since we should have seen similar results in this study, even in the NOS2 KO mice. Likewise, as similarly effective doses of AG did not ameliorate disease in the N2 WT and PL/J mice, residual levels of iNOS activity do not account for the differences between our N2 WT (and PL/J) results and the previous studies. However, this residual iNOS activity most likely is the reason AG-treated N2 WT and PL/J mice did not have as much exacerbation of disease as did the NOS2 KO mice.
Some significant differences exist between this study and those previously described. EAE can be induced by many different methods, which vary depending on the Ag used (e.g., MBP species and sequence, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, PLP), animal species and strain (e.g., PL/J, SJL), degree of barrier containment (autoclaved feed and bedding vs conventional housing, specific pathogen free vs contamination with various murine pathogens) (56), and the means for priming the immune system (e.g., CFA/PT, adoptive transfer). Any of these factors could reasonably affect the clinical course of disease and may explain the differing results between studies, since each most likely has its own, yet incompletely defined, immunologic characteristics. These may also include timing of EAE induction vs the protective action of iNOS expression. In our laboratory, the difference in incidence of disease between genotypes did not become apparent until day 13 postinoculation of the CFA/peptide emulsion. Between days 13 to 24, the difference in disease incidence between the N2 WT and N2 KO mice elevates to three- to fourfold. However, differences between species and models of EAE do not allow us to directly compare the timing of disease onset with data presented elsewhere.
One potential explanation for the differences between this and other studies is the method of EAE induction. This study used an MBP-induced EAE model to avoid problems of graft-vs-host disease in the N2 backcross mice, as did two studies of EAE in rats (60, 61). These studies also found exacerbated EAE using AG while previous studies in mice and rats using adoptive transfer found amelioration using AG (30, 59). These comparative results suggested early stages of EAE induction involving T cell priming and expansion may be more susceptible to iNOS inhibition in the MBP-induced EAE model, in contrast to stages of disease more represented in the adoptive transfer model, which is induced with a bolus of in vitro-activated T cells. However, two recent studies found NOS inhibitors decreased disease in mice induced for EAE using MBP or PLP (62, 63). Differences in the mouse lines and induction methods used may contribute to the contradictions observed, but the exact nature of the role of iNOS and other NOS isoforms in EAE and other T cell-dependent models remains unclear.
One intriguing result observed in the current study was that there was markedly more susceptibility to EAE and less remission of clinical disease in the absence of iNOS activity. Eighty-two percent of the N2 WT mice that became clinically affected with EAE recovered by day 24, while only 19% of the N2 KO mice with EAE recovered. AG treatment also decreased remission rates in the N2 WT and PL/J mice. This observation implies iNOS activity is responsible for the remissions seen in this model of EAE, and raises the following questions: 1) what is the role of iNOS during remissions of the human disease MS, and 2) is there a difference in T cell recruitment in the absence of iNOS activity? By histologic analysis we were unable to detect a greater level of T cell infiltrate or demyelination in the KO samples compared with WT tissues after EAE induction at 14 or 24 days postimmunization. However, this study only looked at the perivascular infiltrate and demyelination in the defined areas of spinal cords and brains of experimental animals euthanized at fixed endpoints. Due to the high mortality rate of the KO mice (38%) compared with the WT mice (6%), the surviving KO mice that were used for histology may not fully represent the role of iNOS by day 24. We can only conclude that there does not appear to be a difference between mononuclear proliferation or adhesion in surviving mice, but we do not know if mice that died had any differences.
Using H & E or Luxol Fast Blue stains, we cannot differentiate T cells
from B cells, so the cell types could not be assessed. It is possible
that differences in infiltrating cell types resulted in the loss of
remission in the N2 KO mice. Likewise, the NOS2 KO mice may
have inherent differences in Th1/Th2 balance, which could accelerate
the disease if there is a shift toward Th1 away from Th2. It has been
demonstrated that T cells from NOS2 KO mice have a
significantly greater Th1-type response after mice are challenged with
Leishmania (35). The authors found that T cells from KO mice
had higher levels of IFN-
and lower levels of IL-4 released after ex
vivo stimulation than that found in T cells from WT mice (35). T cells
from carrageenan-injected KO mice also had higher levels of IFN-
than T cells from control mice (35). Thus, one role of iNOS may be in
controlling the Th1/Th2 balance in inflammation and infectious
diseases. Exacerbation of disease in KO mice could result from this
balance being perturbed.
In conclusion, we found that mice deficient in or with reduced iNOS activity showed more disease and less remission than mice with normal iNOS levels. If this (or any) model of EAE is an appropriate model for MS, treatment of MS patients with NOS inhibitors, especially as more selective drugs for iNOS become available, should be attempted with hesitancy. As the nuances of iNOS protection from EAE may not be obvious, especially with regard to the variability of results observed using NOS inhibitors in models initiated by different means, more intensive studies on the effect of T cell recruitment and host defense will need to be performed before we understand the mechanism of this protection, and the role of iNOS on disease induction and T cell function.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John S. Mudgett, Merck Research Laboratories, PO Box 2000/R80 M-120, Rahway, NJ 07065. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: NOS, nitric oxide synthase; AG, aminoguanidine; CNS, central nervous system; EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; KO, knockout; MBP, myelin basic protein; MS, multiple sclerosis; NO, nitric oxide; Nox (nitrate/nitrite); TFA, trifluoroacetic acid; WT, wild-type; PLP, myelin proteolipid protein; DPBS, Dulbeccos phosphate-buffered saline; H & E, hematoxylin and eosin. ![]()
Received for publication July 21, 1997. Accepted for publication November 18, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Li, E. R. Ramenaden, J. Peng, H. Koito, J. J. Volpe, and P. A. Rosenberg Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Mediates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Microglial Toxicity to Developing Oligodendrocytes When Astrocytes Are Present J. Neurosci., May 14, 2008; 28(20): 5321 - 5330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.E. Gonsette Review: Oxidative stress and excitotoxicity: a therapeutic issue in multiple sclerosis? Multiple Sclerosis, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 22 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. T. Kelleher, A. Matsumoto, J. S. Stamler, and H. E. Marshall NOS2 Regulation of NF-{kappa}B by S-Nitrosylation of p65 J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2007; 282(42): 30667 - 30672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhu, Y. Bando, S. Xiao, K. Yang, A. C. Anderson, V. K. Kuchroo, and S. J. Khoury CD11b+Ly-6Chi Suppressive Monocytes in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis J. Immunol., October 15, 2007; 179(8): 5228 - 5237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Ponomarev, K. Maresz, Y. Tan, and B. N. Dittel CNS-Derived Interleukin-4 Is Essential for the Regulation of Autoimmune Inflammation and Induces a State of Alternative Activation in Microglial Cells J. Neurosci., October 3, 2007; 27(40): 10714 - 10721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Dietlin, F. M. Hofman, B. T. Lund, W. Gilmore, S. A. Stohlman, and R. C. van der Veen Mycobacteria-induced Gr-1+ subsets from distinct myeloid lineages have opposite effects on T cell expansion J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2007; 81(5): 1205 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Fabis, G. S. Scott, R. B. Kean, H. Koprowski, and D. C. Hooper Loss of blood-brain barrier integrity in the spinal cord is common to experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in knockout mouse models PNAS, March 27, 2007; 104(13): 5656 - 5661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Minguela, S. Pastor, W. Mi, J. A. Richardson, and E. S. Ward Feedback Regulation of Murine Autoimmunity via Dominant Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Interferon {gamma} J. Immunol., January 1, 2007; 178(1): 134 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ferlito, K. Irani, N. Faraday, and C. J. Lowenstein Nitric oxide inhibits exocytosis of cytolytic granules from lymphokine-activated killer cells PNAS, August 1, 2006; 103(31): 11689 - 11694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Paintlia, M. K. Paintlia, I. Singh, and A. K. Singh IL-4-Induced Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Activation Inhibits NF-{kappa}B Trans Activation in Central Nervous System (CNS) Glial Cells and Protects Oligodendrocyte Progenitors under Neuroinflammatory Disease Conditions: Implication for CNS-Demyelinating Diseases J. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 176(7): 4385 - 4398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chen, W.-h. Lee, L. Zhong, and C.-P. Liu Regulatory T Cells Can Mediate Their Function through the Stimulation of APCs to Produce Immunosuppressive Nitric Oxide J. Immunol., March 15, 2006; 176(6): 3449 - 3460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Giordano, D. M. Magaletti, and E. A. Clark Nitric oxide and cGMP protein kinase (cGK) regulate dendritic-cell migration toward the lymph-node-directing chemokine CCL19 Blood, February 15, 2006; 107(4): 1537 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yamazaki, H. Akiba, A. Koyanagi, M. Azuma, H. Yagita, and K. Okumura Blockade of B7-H1 on Macrophages Suppresses CD4+ T Cell Proliferation by Augmenting IFN-{gamma}-Induced Nitric Oxide Production J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1586 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Zehntner, C. Brickman, L. Bourbonniere, L. Remington, M. Caruso, and T. Owens Neutrophils That Infiltrate the Central Nervous System Regulate T Cell Responses J. Immunol., April 15, 2005; 174(8): 5124 - 5131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Blais and S. Rivest Effects of TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma} on Nitric Oxide-Induced Neurotoxicity in the Mouse Brain J. Immunol., June 1, 2004; 172(11): 7043 - 7052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Xiong, C. Zhu, F. Li, R. Hegazi, K. He, M. Babyatsky, A. J. Bauer, and S. E. Plevy Inhibition of Interleukin-12 p40 Transcription and NF-{kappa}B Activation by Nitric Oxide in Murine Macrophages and Dendritic Cells J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 2004; 279(11): 10776 - 10783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Monsonego, J. Imitola, V. Zota, T. Oida, and H. L. Weiner Microglia-Mediated Nitric Oxide Cytotoxicity of T Cells Following Amyloid {beta}-Peptide Presentation to Th1 Cells J. Immunol., September 1, 2003; 171(5): 2216 - 2224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dasgupta, Y. Zhou, M. Jana, N. L. Banik, and K. Pahan Sodium Phenylacetate Inhibits Adoptive Transfer of Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis in SJL/J Mice at Multiple Steps J. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 170(7): 3874 - 3882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Liversidge, A. Dick, and S. Gordon Nitric Oxide Mediates Apoptosis Through Formation of Peroxynitrite and Fas/Fas-Ligand Interactions in Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2002; 160(3): 905 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mazzoni, V. Bronte, A. Visintin, J. H. Spitzer, E. Apolloni, P. Serafini, P. Zanovello, and D. M. Segal Myeloid Suppressor Lines Inhibit T Cell Responses by an NO-Dependent Mechanism J. Immunol., January 15, 2002; 168(2): 689 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Arnett, R. P. Hellendall, G. K. Matsushima, K. Suzuki, V. E. Laubach, P. Sherman, and J. P.-Y. Ting The Protective Role of Nitric Oxide in a Neurotoxicant- Induced Demyelinating Model J. Immunol., January 1, 2002; 168(1): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-D. Shi, M. Flodstrom, S. H. Kim, S. Pakala, M. Cleary, H.-G. Ljunggren, and N. Sarvetnick Control of the Autoimmune Response by Type 2 Nitric Oxide Synthase J. Immunol., September 1, 2001; 167(5): 3000 - 3006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Kahn, D. C. Archer, D. P. Gold, and C. J. Kelly Adjuvant Immunotherapy Is Dependent on Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase J. Exp. Med., June 4, 2001; 193(11): 1261 - 1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S.-H. Liu, M.-L. Zhao, C. F. Brosnan, and S. C. Lee Expression of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase and Nitrotyrosine in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2001; 158(6): 2057 - 2066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-Y. Xu, J.-S. Yang, H. Link, and B.-G. Xiao SIN-1, a Nitric Oxide Donor, Ameliorates Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis in Lewis Rats in the Incipient Phase: The Importance of the Time Window J. Immunol., May 1, 2001; 166(9): 5810 - 5816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Juedes and N. H. Ruddle Resident and Infiltrating Central Nervous System APCs Regulate the Emergence and Resolution of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis J. Immunol., April 15, 2001; 166(8): 5168 - 5175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Drulovic, I Dujmovic, S Mesaros, T Samardzic, D Maksimovic, N Stojsavljevic, Z Levic, and M M. Stojkovic Raised cerebrospinal fluid nitrite and nitrate levels in patients with multiple sclerosis: no correlation with disease activity Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2001; 7(1): 19 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Weishaupt, S. Jander, W. Bruck, T. Kuhlmann, M. Stienekemeier, T. Hartung, K. V. Toyka, G. Stoll, and R. Gold Molecular Mechanisms of High-Dose Antigen Therapy in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis: Rapid Induction of Th1-Type Cytokines and Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase J. Immunol., December 15, 2000; 165(12): 7157 - 7163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Kahn, D. C. Archer, and C. J. Kelly Absence of Functional Inducible NO Synthase Enhances the Efficacy of Tolerance Induced by High Dose Antigen Feeding J. Immunol., December 1, 2000; 165(11): 6116 - 6122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Q. Chu, S. Wittmer, and D. K. Dalton Failure to Suppress the Expansion of the Activated CD4 T Cell Population in Interferon {gamma}-deficient Mice Leads to Exacerbation of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis J. Exp. Med., July 3, 2000; 192(1): 123 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Vermeire, L. Thielemans, P. Matthys, and A. Billiau The effects of NO synthase inhibitors on murine collagen-induced arthritis do not support a role of NO in the protective effect of IFN-{gamma} J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2000; 68(1): 119 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D.-M. McCafferty, E. Sihota, M. Muscara, J. L. Wallace, K. A. Sharkey, and P. Kubes Spontaneously developing chronic colitis in IL-10/iNOS double-deficient mice Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2000; 279(1): G90 - G99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. van der Veen, T. A. Dietlin, F. M. Hofman, L. Pen, B. H. Segal, and S. M. Holland Superoxide Prevents Nitric Oxide-Mediated Suppression of Helper T Lymphocytes: Decreased Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Oxidase Knockout Mice J. Immunol., May 15, 2000; 164(10): 5177 - 5183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. O'Brien, B. Charlton, W. B. Cowden, and D. O. Willenborg Nitric Oxide Plays a Critical Role in the Recovery of Lewis Rats from Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis and the Maintenance of Resistance to Reinduction J. Immunol., December 15, 1999; 163(12): 6841 - 6847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Giovannoni, N C Silver, J O'Riordan, R F Miller, S J.R. Heales, J M Land, M Elliot, M Feldmann, D H Miller, and E J Thompson Increased urinary nitric oxide metabolites in patients with multiple sclerosis correlates with early and relapsing disease Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 1999; 5(5): 335 - 341. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Zingarelli, C Szabo, and A L Salzman Reduced oxidative and nitrosative damage in murine experimental colitis in the absence of inducible nitric oxide synthase Gut, August 1, 1999; 45(2): 199 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Butterfield, E. P. Blankenhorn, R. J. Roper, J. F. Zachary, R. W. Doerge, J. Sudweeks, J. Rose, and C. Teuscher Genetic Analysis of Disease Subtypes and Sexual Dimorphisms in Mouse Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis (EAE): Relapsing/Remitting and Monophasic Remitting/Nonrelapsing EAE Are Immunogenetically Distinct J. Immunol., March 1, 1999; 162(5): 3096 - 3102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Tarrant, P. B. Silver, J. L. Wahlsten, L. V. Rizzo, C.-C. Chan, B. Wiggert, and R. R. Caspi Interleukin 12 Protects from a T Helper Type 1-mediated Autoimmune Disease, Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis, through a Mechanism Involving Interferon gamma , Nitric Oxide, and Apoptosis J. Exp. Med., January 18, 1999; 189(2): 219 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bogdan The Multiplex Function of Nitric Oxide in (Auto)immunity J. Exp. Med., May 4, 1998; 187(9): 1361 - 1365. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |