|
|
||||||||
,

*
Istituto di Biologia dello Sviluppo Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR), Palermo, Italy;
Center for Molecular and Cellular Biology,
Department of Biochemistry, and
§
Center for Drug Design and Development, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; and
¶
Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Universita di Ferrara, Italy
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pollen of the weed Parietaria judaica (Pj) is the main cause of immediate hypersensitivity in the Mediterranean area, and an epidemiologic study conducted on 1787 allergic patients showed that up to 50% reacted to Pj pollen extract (3). However, the presence of this weed is not restricted to the Mediterranean, since it has also been described in temperate climates of Central and Eastern Europe, Australia, and California (4, 5). The pollen of Pj contains at least nine different allergens with molecular masses ranging from 10,000 to 80,000 Da (6, 7). Two of them, designated Par j 1.0101 and Par j 2.0101, have already been cloned and sequenced (8, 9). The mature processed allergen Par j 1.0101 is a protein of 14,726 Da containing 139 amino acids residues and is capable of inducing histamine release from human basophils of Pj-allergic patients (10). It is a major allergen, since it interacts with 95% of the sera from Pj-allergic patients and blocks approximately 40% of all the IgEs specific for the Pj total crude extract (8, 10). The Par j 2.0101 is a protein of 102 amino acids with a molecular mass of 11,344 Da and shows a 45% homology at the amino acids level with the Par j 1.0101. Preincubation of sera from Pj allergic patients with both rPar j 1.0101 and rPar j 2.0101 fully abolished IgE recognition of the 10- to 14-kDa native major allergenic area, suggesting that the two allergens contributed to that region. Considering these important immunologic properties we focused our attention on the IgE binding regions of these allergens, and in this manuscript we report the identification of one discontinuous IgE epitope embodied in the first 30 amino acids of the Par j 1.0101 allergen. This region contains a common Par j 1.0101 and Par j 2.0101 dominant epitope and does not induce histamine release, suggesting that this molecule might be used as a specific hapten to block the cytophilic IgEs bound to the basophils and mast cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The technique of protein modeling by homology is used to assign 3D structure to a protein of unknown structure based on structural information from members of the same family (11). The crystal structure of the homologous soybean nonspecific lipid transport (ns-LT) protein (pdb1hyp.ent.) was used as a template to generate the Par j 1.0101 3D model. The intervening loop structures were obtained by searching the Brookhaven Protein Databank for proteins containing loops of the same length joining similar secondary structural units, and disulfide bonds were assigned according to the crystal structure of soybean ns-LTP. Calculations were performed using Biosym 95.0 on a Silicon Graphics Indigo 2 workstation (Mountain View, CA). Modeling was performed using the homology module provided by Biosym. Energy minimization was performed using Biosyms consistent valence forcefield via a combination of steepest descents and conjugate gradient algorithms to a convergence criterion of <1 Cal/mol-Å, unless otherwise stated. A nonbonded cutoff of 8 Å was used with a switching function applied between 6.5 and 8 Å.
Eisenberg analysis
Eisenberg profile analysis (12) was used to verify the predicted structure. Eisenberg et al. suggested that a cutoff of <0.45 x Scalc is useful for identifying grossly misfolded structures. Models with scores between 0.45 x Scalc and Scalc were considered correct, although it is still possible that locally misfolded regions occur. Examination of the profile score in a moving window scan of 10 residues can be used to identify locally misfolded regions.
Deletion mutants
Primers for PCR amplification were (lowercase letters indicate the restriction enzyme cloning site, and uppercase letters indicate the coding sequence): oligo 1, 5'-ccggaattcCAAGAAACCTGCGGGACTATG-3'; oligo 16, 5'-ccggaattcCCGTTTGTGCAGGGGAAAGAG-3'; oligo 30, 5'-gtgtctagaTCAGCTGCAGCACCCCTTTGACGGCTCTTTC-3'; oligo 28, 5'-gtgtctagaTCACCCCTTTGACGGCTCTTTCTCTTTCCC-3'; Cys4 mutant, 5'-ccggaattcCAAGAAACCAGCGGGACTATG-3'; Cys29 mutant, 5'-gtgtctagaTCAGCTGCAGCTCCCCTTTGACGGCTCTTTC-3'; Cys30 deletion, 5'-gtgtctagaTCAGCTGCACCCCTTTGACGGCTCTTTC-3'; oligo Q19, 5'-ccgtctagaTCAGCTGCAGCACCCCTTTGACGGCTCTTTCTCTTTCCCCGCCAC-3'; oligo K21, 5'-ccgtctagaTCAGCTGCAGCACCCCTTTGACGGCTCTTTCTCTGCCCC-3'; oligo E22, 5'-ccgtctagaTCAGCTGCAGCACCCCTTTGACGGCTCTTTCGCTTT-3'; oligo K23, 5'-ccgtctagaTCAGCTGCAGCACCCCTTTGACGGCTCCGCCTC-3'; oligo E24, 5'-ccgtctagaTCAGCTGCAGCACCCCTTTGACGGCGCTTTC-3'; and oligo K27, 5'-ccgtctagaTCAGCTGCAGCACCCCGCTGACGGCGC-3'.
One nanogram of the P5 clone (7) was subjected to 30 cycles of PCR amplification at the following conditions: 94°C for 30 min, 52°C for 30 min, and 72°C for 30 min. The PCR products were purified and cloned in the EcoRI/XbaI sites of the pMALC2 vector (Biolabs, U.K.). The pPJ1.2 and pPj1.3 clones were made by annealing the following oligos: pPj1.2 forward, aattcCAAGAAACCTGCGGGACTATGGTGAGAGCGCTGATGCCG; pPj1.2 reverse, gCGGCATCAGCGCTCTCACCATAGTCCCGCAGGTTTCTTG; pPj1.3 forward, aattcGCGCTGATGCCGTGCCTGCCGTTCGTGCAGGGGAAA; and pPj1.3 reverse, gTTTCCCCTGCAC GAACTTCAGGCACGGCATCAGCGC.
All the clones were sequenced, and the open reading frames were confirmed.
Peptide synthesis
The synthetic peptides were prepared by solid phase synthesis
performed in a Milligen 9050 synthesizer (Burlington, MA) as previously
described (13). Crude peptides were purified by preparative reverse
phase HPLC using a Waters
Prep 3000 system (Waters Associates,
Milford, MA) as previously reported (14), and structures were
confirmed by amino acid analysis using phenylisothiocyanate
methodology and electrospray mass spectrometry: pep1,
QETCGTMVRALMPCLPFVQGKEKEPSKGCC; pep2, QETCGTMVRALMPCLPFVQGKEKEPSKG;
and pep3, QETCGT MVRALMPSLPFVQGKEKEPSKGCC.
Preparation of the recombinant allergens
The recombinant clones were grown to 0.5 to 0.6 OD600 in Luria Bertoni broth and induced with 0.3 mM isopropylthio-ß-galactoside for 2 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, and the pellet was dissolved in sodium phosphate buffer (10 mM Na phosphate, pH 7.2; 200 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; and 1 mM NaN3). Cells were sonicated using a Heat System Ultrasonic W-285, and the cell debris was removed by centrifugation (9000 rpm, 30 min). The supernatant was diluted 1/20 with 10 mM EDTA and concentrated by using a Centriprep concentrator (Amicon, Danvers, MA). The concentration of the recombinant proteins was detected by densitometric analysis of SDS-PAGE gels stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.
Western and dot blot analysis
Ten micrograms of each recombinant Escherichia coli cell extract and 20 µg of the Pj crude extracts were fractionated on 10 and 16% PAGE-SDS gels, respectively. Gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue or electroblotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. For dot-blot analysis, 10 µg of each peptide was spotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond C, Amersham, Aylesbury, UK). Membranes were air-dried, incubated in blocking buffer (PBS supplemented with 3% BSA, 0.5% Tween-20, and 0.02% NaN3), and washed three times in washing buffer (1x PBS/0.1% Tween-20). Subsequently, membranes were incubated overnight with a pool of sera (1/5 dilution; n = 30) from Pj allergic patients with high RAST value.
Reduction of the disulfide bonds to sulfhydryl groups was performed by incubating the membrane with 2% (v/v) 2ß-ME in 20 ml of potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5, for 30 min. Membranes were washed three times with potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5, and incubated overnight with a pool of sera (1/5 dilution; n = 30) from Pj allergic patients with high RAST values supplemented with 1 mM DTT. The IgE binding complexes were detected as previously described (8).
Histamine release assay
Human basophils for the histamine release assay were obtained by venipuncture using a heparinized syringe from atopic and nonatopic subjects. The atopics were allergic to Pj pollen and shared a RAST positivity value of 4+. Informed consent and permission was obtained from the subjects. Pj pollen extract (1 µg/ml) and rPar j 1.0101 (1 µg/ml) were used as positive controls. The pep1 synthetic peptide was used at concentrations of 1 and 10 µg/ml. The histamine released in response to the synthetic peptide was determined as previously reported (15). The total histamine contained in the basophils was determined from the supernatant obtained by boiling 200 µl of blood for 10 min. The net histamine released in response to the synthetic peptide was expressed as a percentage of the total cellular histamine after subtraction of the level of histamine spontaneously released in the absence of the stimulus.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The soybean ns-LTP three-dimensional structure has been used as a
template for 3D structural modeling as described by Kennedy et al.
(16). The crystal structure of soybean ns-LTP has an overall







ß secondary structure with four disulfide
bonds (17). The Par j 1.0101 allergen was modeled according to
conserved secondary structural regions and disulfide bonds as described
in Materials and Methods. The resulting 3D model of the
major allergen of Pj was verified by an Eisenberg analysis (12, 18, 19)
and gave a profile score of 20.35 (0.45 x Scalc = 19.07).
This value strongly suggests that the protein may attain a fold
consistent with that of the soybean ns-LTP. The 3D structure of the
resulting model is shown in Figure 1
.
|
The Par j 1.0101 cDNA was used as a template in a PCR strategy
searching for IgE binding region. In particular, the 1 to 30 region
(pPJ1 clone) was investigated, since it represents a region of high
homology between the Par j 1.0101 and Par j 2.0101 major allergens. The
pPJ1 fusion protein was capable of binding human IgE by Western blot,
suggesting that this region contained at least one IgE binding site. To
analyze the region in more detail, additional smaller subclones were
made to define the minimum size of the epitope. The 1 to 30 region was
split into three overlapping regions from amino acids 1 to 13 (pPJ1.2
clone), from amino acids 10 to 21 (pPJ1.3 clone), and from amino acids
12 to 30 (pPJ1.4 clone) and cloned in the pMALC2 expression vector
(Fig. 2
A). None of
these three clones was capable of binding human IgE, suggesting that
the epitope present in this region needs the entire region to attain a
functional 3D structure. To investigate the role of the four cysteine
residues contained in the region we made deletions of the cysteine
residues in positions 30 and 29 and a serine substitution at positions
4, 29, and 14 (pPJ1.5, pPJ1.6, pPJ1.7, pPJ1.8, and pep3, respectively).
The pPJ1.5 clone was still capable of binding IgE, whereas the pPJ1.6
clone had no IgE binding activity, suggesting that the C30 did not play
any role in IgE Ab recognition. The pPJ1.7 clone was still capable of
binding IgE, whereas the pPJ1.8 clone showed a very weak IgE binding
activity (Fig. 2
A). To confirm the importance of the
disulfide bonds between cysteines 14 and 29, we performed a dot-blot
assay with the Par j 1.0101 allergen and the pep1 peptide under
reducing conditions. This experiment showed that the pep1 peptide
structure is destroyed by 2ß-ME treatment, confirming that the
cysteines contained in that region are essential for IgE binding, as
previously shown by site-directed mutagenesis (Fig. 2
B).
|
|
To confirm that the IgE binding activity of the 1 to 30 clone was
due exclusively to the Pj sequence, we used synthetic peptides covering
the 1 to 30 and 1 to 28 regions (pep1 and pep2, respectively) and
tested them in a dot-blot assay. They showed a pattern of reaction
identical with that of the pPJ1 and pPJ1.6 clones (Fig. 2
).
Inhibition assay
The recombinant Par j 1.0101, Par j 2.0101, and pPJ1 proteins were
fractionated on PAGE-SDS gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane,
and incubated either with a pool of sera from patients allergic to the
Pj pollen (Fig. 4
A) or
with the same pool of sera treated with 50 µg/ml of rPar j 1.0101
(Fig. 4
B) or rPar j 2.0101 (Fig. 4
C). These data showed that the rPar j 2.0101
allergen is capable of blocking the specific IgE vs the 1 to 30 region
of the Par j 1.0101 molecule, suggesting the presence of a common
epitope between the two allergens.
|
|
Pep1 was used to test its capacity to induce histamine release
from basophils of Pj allergic patients. Basophils from six patients
with high concentrations of Pj-specific IgEs did not show any release
after pretreatment with different concentrations of the 1 to 30
synthetic peptide. Total Pj crude extract and rPar j 1.0101 protein
were used as positive controls (Table I
).
This result indicates that the 1 to 30 region contains only a single
IgE epitope, since the release of histamine detected during an allergic
reaction requires cross-linking between at least two epitopes on the
allergenic molecule complexed to the IgEs bound to the basophil
surface.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Pj pollen contains at least nine allergens, of which the two major
allergens have been isolated and characterized (8, 9). Sequence
homology analysis using a Blast database search from the European
Molecular Biology Laboratory Service of the current databases has shown
a high degree of amino acid identity between the two Pj major allergens
and a family of proteins from plants whose function is to facilitate in
vitro ns-LTP between membranes (24, 25, 26). They contain a conserved
secondary structure forming a 






ß fold with a
subset of specific amino acids required to maintain a tertiary
structure, including eight cysteine residues forming four disulfide
bonds that compact the four helixes. The overall effect of the
secondary structures is to form a right hand winding of the
helixes
with a hydrophobic pocket for lipid interactions; meanwhile, the
C-terminal, which is not clearly defined, may form a cap to the pocket.
We used the soybean ns-LTP crystal structure as a template for the Par
j 1.0101 allergen 3D structural modeling, since it provides
satisfactory resolution at 1.8 Å and has the same topographical fold
as the other members of this family. By this techniques, the Par j
1.0101 major allergen has been shown to adopt the same structural fold
as members of the plant ns-LTP family although no allergenic activity
has been shown for the other members of this family to date.
Mapping an epitope by gene fragmentation and/or point mutations is
often expensive and time consuming. Analysis of a 3D model can be used
to detect the amino acids residues that are exposed to the solvent
surface and thus represent potential epitope residues. In particular,
the recombinant pPJ1 fusion protein was investigated by Western blot,
since it contains a cluster of residues within the region presenting
side chains exposed to the solvent surface and containing the
properties (bulky and/or charged side chains) to form an epitope. In
addition, the 1 to 30 region represents a region of high homology
between the Par j 1.0101 and Par j 2.0101 major allergens (65% amino
acids identity; see the alignment of highest homology at the
bottom of Fig. 4
), and preliminary results by
cross-inhibition experiments suggested the presence of a common
epitope(s) between the two molecules. In this paper we describe the
identification of an IgE binding region in the first 30 amino acids of
the major Pj pollen allergens and its characterization as a haptenic
molecule. In particular, either deletion or serine substitutions of the
cysteine residues at positions 14 and 29 suggested that these amino
acids were essential for IgE binding. In fact, dot-blot assays in the
presence of 2ß-ME showed that the reduction of the disulfide bonds to
sulfhydryl groups caused loss of IgE binding. All these data are in
agreement with the high resolution crystal structure studies of
homologous ns-LTP proteins in which it has been shown that the cysteine
14
cysteine 29 bond is one of the four essential covalent bonds
conserved among several plant ns-LTP (27, 28). To better define the
structure of the epitope, we performed a site-specific mutational
analysis of the loop 1 residues that allowed us to determine that the
K21, K23, E24, and K27 amino acids are essential for IgE Ab
recognition. More interestingly, comparison sequence analysis and
cross-inhibition experiments showed that this region contains a common
epitope between the major Par j 1.0101 and Par j 2.0101 allergens (Fig. 4
) and that the preincubation of a pool of sera from Pj allergic
patients with the recombinant pPJ1 protein caused a decrease in binding
of about 30% of all the IgE toward the 10 to 14 kDa major allergenic
area (Fig. 5
). It has also been shown that the 1 to 30 region contains
only a single epitope capable of binding IgE; therefore, it is unable
to trigger any release of histamine. A consequence of this property is
that the 1 to 30 region is an IgE hapten and may be a useful
therapeutic candidate, since it can specifically bind the IgE present
on the basophil and mast cell membranes, thus preventing the binding of
native allergenic molecules.
In conclusion, definition of the IgE epitopes of an allergenic molecule is a key step in the understanding of the allergic reaction, since they represent the effectors of the immune reaction. In particular, the Pj 130 IgE hapten can be used to reduce at least 30% of the allergenic response toward the Pj major allergens, supporting the idea that it might represent an important tool for the development of a therapy against the Pj-induced allergy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Contributed equally to this paper. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Paolo Colombo, Istituto di Biologia dello Sviluppo CNR, Via Ugo La Malfa 153, 90145 Palermo, Italy. E-mail address: ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: 3D, three-dimensional; Pj, Parietaria judaica; ns-LTP, nonspecific lipid transport protein; RAST, radio allergosorbent test. ![]()
Received for publication August 14, 1997. Accepted for publication November 18, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Karisola, J. Mikkola, N. Kalkkinen, K. J. Airenne, O. H. Laitinen, S. Repo, O. T. Pentikainen, T. Reunala, K. Turjanmaa, M. S. Johnson, et al. Construction of Hevein (Hev b 6.02) with Reduced Allergenicity for Immunotherapy of Latex Allergy by Comutation of Six Amino Acid Residues on the Conformational IgE Epitopes J. Immunol., February 15, 2004; 172(4): 2621 - 2628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Banerjee, V. P. Kurup, P. A. Greenberger, K. J. Kelly, and J. N. Fink C-Terminal Cysteine Residues Determine the IgE Binding of Aspergillus fumigatus Allergen Asp f 2 J. Immunol., November 1, 2002; 169(9): 5137 - 5144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Karisola, H. Alenius, J. Mikkola, N. Kalkkinen, J. Helin, O. T. Pentikainen, S. Repo, T. Reunala, K. Turjanmaa, M. S. Johnson, et al. The Major Conformational IgE-binding Epitopes of Hevein (Hev b6.02) Are Identified by a Novel Chimera-based Allergen Epitope Mapping Strategy J. Biol. Chem., June 14, 2002; 277(25): 22656 - 22661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Urquhart, D. Kennedy, S. J. Gould, and D. I. Crane Interaction of Pex5p, the Type 1 Peroxisome Targeting Signal Receptor, with the Peroxisomal Membrane Proteins Pex14p and Pex13p J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2000; 275(6): 4127 - 4136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. De Palma, S. Wu, F. Sallusto, G. Di Felice, P. Martucci, D. Geraci, P. Colombo, C. Troise, G. Sacerdoti, A. Nocera, et al. Use of Antagonist Peptides to Inhibit In Vitro T Cell Responses to Par j1, the Major Allergen of Parietaria judaica Pollen J. Immunol., February 15, 1999; 162(4): 1982 - 1987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |