|
|
||||||||
CUTTING EDGE |


Departments of
*
Neurology and
Medical and Molecular Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and TNF-
that induce NO induction are
thought to play an immunopathogenetic role in MS (12). Finally, in
animals with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model
for MS, increased levels of NO and iNOS mRNA have been detected in the
CNS (13, 14, 15), and the administration of iNOS inhibitors or NO
scavengers has inhibited disease (16, 17). Selective blockade of iNOS production has been considered as a novel therapeutic approach in MS. Unfortunately, current generation of substrate-based pharmacologic iNOS inhibitors lack high selectivity for different isoforms of NO synthases (18). In contrast, antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) knockdown strategy has the unique potential to be a highly selective tool for arresting iNOS mRNA translation into functional enzyme. Extensive studies have demonstrated that a short synthetic ODN, complementary to a specific mRNA, can enter cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis and stop protein translation either by blocking the translocation of ribosomes (19, 20) or by destroying the target mRNA through a RNase H-mediated degradation process (21). Furthermore, recent in vivo studies have suggested that it is a viable and powerful technique for treating systemic disease (22).
Our previous studies have shown that an antisense ODN,
complementary to mouse iNOS mRNA, significantly inhibited LPS- and
IFN-
-induced iNOS and NO production in adult SJL mouse glial
cultures (23), thereby demonstrating the efficacy of the antisense ODN.
Additionally, we have shown that highly susceptible female SJL mice
with severe EAE expressed higher levels of iNOS and NO in the CNS than
less susceptible male mice with mild EAE (15, 24). In this report, we
aimed to specifically inhibit iNOS in the CNS of female SJL mice
through the intraventricular administration of iNOS antisense ODN,
hypothesizing that this might ameliorate EAE.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Female SJL/J mice, age 8 wk, were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and maintained according to National Institutes of Health guidelines.
Immunization and adoptive EAE induction
Adoptive EAE was induced through the adoptive transfer of 18.5-kDa myelin basic protein-specific T lymphocytes as described (15, 24).
Clinical assessment of disease
Animals induced to develop EAE were examined daily for clinical signs of disease and graded in a blinded fashion on a scale of 0 to 5 as follows: 0, normal; 1, limp tail; 2, difficulty righting; 3, partial paralysis of one hind limb; 4, complete paralysis of at least one hind limb; 5, moribund.
The oligodeoxynucleotide sequences
The iNOS antisense ODN sequence was a 21-base phosphorothioate-oligodeoxynucleotide (S-ODN) corresponding to bases 1 through 21 of the translation initiation site of mouse iNOS mRNA. The corresponding sense S-ODN and a random S-ODN sequence, each with the same base composition as the antisense S-ODN, were used as control ODNs. No sequence homology exists between these sequences and the rest of the known mouse sequences within GenBank. The ODN were synthesized by Oligos Etc. (Oregon, OR). Antisense: 5'-CAAGCCATGTCTGAGACTTTG-3'; sense: 5'-CAAAGTCTCAGACATGGCTTG-3'; random: 5'-GTCAAGGTAACCTTGAGTTCC-3'.
Intraventricular injection of antisense ODN and preparation of tissue samples
SJL mice (68 wk old) underwent Metofane (Mallinckrodt Veterinary, Mundelein, IL) inhalation anesthesia. Stereotaxic operations were performed in a Kopf small animal stereotaxic instrument (David Kopf, Tujunga, CA). The calvarium was exposed; a hole <0.5 mm in diameter was drilled with a dental drill at the coordinate of 1 mm lateral to the sagittal suture, 1 mm caudal to the bregma, and 2.5 mm below the surface of the skull. A 31-gauge cannula with dummy cannula (Plastic One, Roanoke, VA) was implanted at this site. The ODNs were dissolved in sterile 0.9% saline and injected into the ventricle through the cannula using a Hamilton 5-µl syringe. Injections were administered from the day of T cell transfer to the appearance of severe clinical EAE in the control groups, 10 days posttransfer. Mice were killed, and the coordinates were checked with dye injection. The brains were removed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -70°C.
Northern blot analysis for iNOS mRNA
Poly(A)+ RNA (5 µg/lane) from mouse cerebellum was extracted and subjected to Northern blot analysis as described (15). A [32P]dATP-labeled mouse macrophage iNOS cDNA fragment (obtained from Dr. D. Geller, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) was used as the probe. A ß-actin probe (SalI/BamHI 451-bp restriction fragment) was used to assure equal loading.
Determination of nitric oxide (NOx-) by Griess reaction and nitrate reductase
The NOx- level in the homogenates of mouse cerebellum was determined by measuring the levels of nitrite (NO2-) and nitrate (NO3-), stable oxidation products of NO. The concentrations of NO2- and NO3- were measured by Griess reaction as described (25).
Determination of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) by radioimmunoassay
Mouse cerebellar tissues were homogenized in 1 ml of cold assay buffer (50 mM sodium acetate with 0.1% sodium azide, pH 6.2). The homogenates were centrifuged at 14,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C, and 100 µl of supernatant were then assayed in duplicate using cGMP radioimmunoassay as described (25, 26). Rabbit antiserum against cGMP was provided by Dr. S. Murphy (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA).
Western blot analysis for iNOS protein
Total proteins from mouse cerebellar tissues were harvested and homogenized with 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 1 mM pepstatin A, and 2 mM leupeptin at 04°C. Homogenates were centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 60 min at 4°C. The protein concentration in the supernatant of the cellular homogenates was determined by the Bradford Coomassie brilliant blue method (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA). Bovine serum albumin was used as the standard. The tissue lysates were diluted and subjected to Western blot analysis as described (25). The blot was sequentially probed with a polyclonal rabbit Ab specific for mouse iNOS peptide (1:500) and a mAb specific for mouse neuronal NOS (nNOS, 1:1000; Alexis, San Diego, CA).
Determination of iNOS enzyme activity by citrulline assay
The iNOS activity was measured by determining the conversion of L-[3H]arginine to L-[3H]citrulline as described (25, 27).
Statistical methods
Statistical analysis was performed using StatView SE+Graphics (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). This program performs ANOVA with factorial or repeated measures and expresses significance by Fishers pairwise least significant difference test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine whether iNOS antisense ODN could affect the induction
of clinical EAE, ODNs were delivered into mouse cerebrospinal fluid via
daily intraventricular injection (10 µg/µl/injection/day) beginning
on the day of adoptive transfer and continuing until saline-treated
control mice demonstrated paralysis, day 10 posttransfer. Additional
control groups included mice injected with sense or random ODNs. In the
first experiment, there were three animals in each group. All mice in
all control groups demonstrated signs of EAE by day 10, whereas none of
the antisense ODN-treated mice developed paralysis. The clinical score
of the antisense ODN-treated group was significantly lower than that of
the saline-treated group (p < 0.001, Fig. 1
A). In the second
experiment, the sample size was increased to six mice per group. With
this greater number of mice in each group, a minority of mice in the
antisense-treated group demonstrated mild clinical sign of EAE (two of
six mice, grade = 2), whereas the majority remained without sign
of EAE (four of six mice, grade = 0). The mean clinical score of
the antisense ODN-treated group was again significantly lower than that
of the saline-treated control group (p < 0.01,
Fig. 1
B). In both experiments, the mean scores of
mice treated with the sense and random ODNs were no different from
those of mice treated with saline. No abnormal side effects of the
therapy were observed.
|
To determine the effect of iNOS antisense ODN treatment on iNOS
mRNA and protein expression, Northern and Western analyses were
performed on cerebellar tissues derived from mice with representative
scores from each group (control groups, grade 3; antisense group, grade
0). Northern blots of poly(A)+ RNA were probed with a
murine macrophage NOS probe, and the expected 4.1-kb band was detected
in control treated mice but not in iNOS antisense ODN-treated mice
(Fig. 2
A). Western
blots of total cerebellar proteins using mouse iNOS-specific Ab
demonstrated a reduction in iNOS protein level in the iNOS antisense
ODN-treated mice as compared with mice in the three control groups.
Importantly, the nNOS-specific Ab detected bands of equal intensity
between all groups (Fig. 2
B).
|
To determine the effect of iNOS antisense ODN on iNOS enzyme
activity, we assessed the ability of cytosolic iNOS, extracted from
mouse cerebellum, to convert L-arginine to
L-citrulline (27). Three mice with representative scores
from each group (control groups, grade 3; antisense group, grade 0)
were examined. Consistent with iNOS protein levels, iNOS catalytic
activity was significantly reduced by the iNOS antisense ODN treatment
compared with control groups. Neither the sense nor the random ODN
significantly affected iNOS enzyme activity. Moreover, the nNOS enzyme
activity was not affected by any ODN treatment (Fig. 3
).
|
To determine the functional consequence of iNOS knockdown, we
analyzed NO levels and cGMP production in mouse cerebellum. Again, mice
with representative scores were examined. As determined by the Griess
reaction with nitrate reductase, the iNOS antisense ODN treatment
significantly reduced NO production whereas neither sense nor random
ODN treatment had any effect (Fig. 4
A). Similarly, as
indicated by cGMP radioimmunoassay, cGMP production was significantly
inhibited by antisense but not sense or random ODN treatment (Fig. 4
B).
|
Despite the success of using antisense ODN to inhibit gene expression, the precise molecular mechanisms involved are still not fully understood. The inhibition of target mRNA translation by bound antisense ODN may involve the ubiquitous enzyme RNase H, which hydrolyzes the RNA of the RNA-DNA duplex, leading to a decrease in target RNA levels (21). Alternatively, the formation of the RNA-DNA duplex may block ribosome binding and translocation along the mRNA, thereby preventing the continued synthesis of the target protein (20). In the present study, Northern blot analysis indicated a significant decrease of iNOS mRNA in the CNS of mice treated with iNOS antisense ODN. These results support the mechanism of RNase H-mediated degradation of mRNA in DNA/RNA hybrids. Nevertheless, Western blot analysis revealed a significantly reduced level of iNOS protein, thereby demonstrating that the translation of iNOS protein was specifically blocked by the antisense treatment.
Although we have observed that continuous administration of iNOS antisense ODN significantly inhibited the induction of EAE, it remains to be determined whether clinical signs of EAE will appear following termination of iNOS antisense ODN treatment. This will be important in advancing toward the use of antisense ODN as a novel therapeutic approach in MS.
Finally, antisense ODN knockdown strategy may be implemented to examine the pathogenic role of the expression of other genes in EAE. In contrast to gene knockouts, the outcome of knockdown strategy is not complicated by the generation of functionally redundant pathways that may arise developmentally.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Minzhen Ding, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, UCLA, Reed Neurology Research Building, Room A-134, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; MS, multiple sclerosis; CNS, central nervous system; NOS, nitric oxide synthase; EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; ODN, oligodeoxynucleotide; S-ODN, phosphorothioate-oligodeoxynucleotide; cGMP, cyclic guanosine monophosphate. ![]()
Received for publication October 20, 1997. Accepted for publication January 16, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Ling, X. Pi, and J. Holoshitz The Rheumatoid Arthritis Shared Epitope Triggers Innate Immune Signaling via Cell Surface Calreticulin J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 6359 - 6367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dasgupta, A. Roy, M. Jana, D. M. Hartley, and K. Pahan Gemfibrozil Ameliorates Relapsing-Remitting Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Independent of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha} Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2007; 72(4): 934 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Paintlia, M. K. Paintlia, I. Singh, and A. K. Singh IL-4-Induced Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Activation Inhibits NF-{kappa}B Trans Activation in Central Nervous System (CNS) Glial Cells and Protects Oligodendrocyte Progenitors under Neuroinflammatory Disease Conditions: Implication for CNS-Demyelinating Diseases J. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 176(7): 4385 - 4398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dasgupta, Y. Zhou, M. Jana, N. L. Banik, and K. Pahan Sodium Phenylacetate Inhibits Adoptive Transfer of Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis in SJL/J Mice at Multiple Steps J. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 170(7): 3874 - 3882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dasgupta, M. Jana, X. Liu, and K. Pahan Myelin Basic Protein-primed T Cells Induce Nitric Oxide Synthase in Microglial Cells. IMPLICATIONS FOR MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS J. Biol. Chem., October 11, 2002; 277(42): 39327 - 39333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Arnett, R. P. Hellendall, G. K. Matsushima, K. Suzuki, V. E. Laubach, P. Sherman, and J. P.-Y. Ting The Protective Role of Nitric Oxide in a Neurotoxicant- Induced Demyelinating Model J. Immunol., January 1, 2002; 168(1): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. I. Austenaa and A. C. Ross Potentiation of interferon-{gamma}-stimulated nitric oxide production by retinoic acid in RAW 264.7 cells J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2001; 70(1): 121 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-Y. Xu, J.-S. Yang, H. Link, and B.-G. Xiao SIN-1, a Nitric Oxide Donor, Ameliorates Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis in Lewis Rats in the Incipient Phase: The Importance of the Time Window J. Immunol., May 1, 2001; 166(9): 5810 - 5816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Drulovic, I Dujmovic, S Mesaros, T Samardzic, D Maksimovic, N Stojsavljevic, Z Levic, and M M. Stojkovic Raised cerebrospinal fluid nitrite and nitrate levels in patients with multiple sclerosis: no correlation with disease activity Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2001; 7(1): 19 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hesse, A. W. Cheever, D. Jankovic, and T. A. Wynn NOS-2 Mediates the Protective Anti-Inflammatory and Antifibrotic Effects of the Th1-Inducing Adjuvant, IL-12, in a Th2 Model of Granulomatous Disease Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2000; 157(3): 945 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Heeger, T. Forsthuber, C. Shive, E. Biekert, C. Genain, H. H. Hofstetter, A. Karulin, and P. V. Lehmann Revisiting Tolerance Induced by Autoantigen in Incomplete Freund's Adjuvant J. Immunol., June 1, 2000; 164(11): 5771 - 5781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. van der Veen, T. A. Dietlin, F. M. Hofman, L. Pen, B. H. Segal, and S. M. Holland Superoxide Prevents Nitric Oxide-Mediated Suppression of Helper T Lymphocytes: Decreased Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Oxidase Knockout Mice J. Immunol., May 15, 2000; 164(10): 5177 - 5183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bogdan The Multiplex Function of Nitric Oxide in (Auto)immunity J. Exp. Med., May 4, 1998; 187(9): 1361 - 1365. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |